TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

March 30, 2016

Western Hypocrites & the 1965 Indonesian Right-Wing Massacres





Western Hypocrites & the 1965 Indonesian Right-Wing Massacres



Australia’s Role in the 1965-66 Communist Massacres in Indonesia

By Marlene Millott                 EXTRACTS


Fifty years ago, on September 30, one of the worst atrocities of the 20th century took place on Australia’s doorstep. Following an AIIA and ANU conference on these events, a young Australian reflects on Australia’s complicity.

An estimated half a million people affiliated with the Partai Komunis Indonesia (Indonesian Communist Party or PKI) were massacred by the Indonesian Army, with help from local religious and youth groups. These killings contributed to a reorientation in Indonesian politics, installing General Suharto as president and eliminating the once-strong PKI through violent purges and systematic imprisonment. Declassified documents have shown that the US and its allies played a significant role in these killings, as the US provided weapons, communications equipment and lists of known communists. As an ally of the US, the Australian Embassy and the Department of External Affairs acted in a way that made Australia an accomplice, by helping to create the conditions that allowed the massacres to take place.

In the years leading up to 1965, Sukarno favoured the PKI and it grew in strength, while his foreign policy became increasingly hostile towards the West. The Indonesian Army and the US and its allies watched these developments with suspicion, and formed secret relationships. From 1958-1965, the US secretly trained, funded and advised the Army to turn it into a ‘state within a state’ that would be ready to take over government if the opportunity arose.

On the night of the 30th of September 1965, the Commander of the Army Lt General Achmad Yani and five Generals were kidnapped by a group calling themselves the September 30th Movement. They were murdered and thrown down a well. The Army and the US embassy had been patiently waiting for an event like this. It declared the PKI responsible for masterminding a coup, seized almost all media outlets and spread the story of PKI treachery. General Suharto extracted a mandate from Sukarno to return order to the country, before setting out to destroy the Communist Party.

Across the archipelago, a campaign to eliminate the PKI saw the murder of an estimated 500,000 people. Victims were rounded up and detained for days, or months, before being executed. The Army was instrumental in the massacres, often accompanied by local militias. Those who weren’t killed were transferred to prison camps, with one million people held in detention facilities without trial, with terms varying from a few months to fourteen years.

Following the events of September 30th, Western nations solidified their support for the Indonesian Army, in an effort to remove the PKI from power and sideline Sukarno. The US and the UK, supported by other nations in the region including Australia, carried out clandestine operations which supported and encouraged the Army-led massacres of alleged PKI. Documents from the National Archives of Australia show that the Australian Embassy and the Department of External Affairs were closely aligned with the Indonesian Army, offered support for their activities in overthrowing Sukarno and eliminating the PKI, and used Radio Australia to broadcast Army propaganda in Indonesia that contributed to anti-Communist hysteria.

Cables show that the Australian Embassy was aware that Communists were being rounded up and killed from early October 1965. The Australian Ambassador to Indonesia, Keith Shann, ‘personally witnessed’ around 250 prisoners being taken away by the Army, and noted that it was impossible to know the number of people killed and detained, but ‘it cannot be small’. In February 1966, J.M. Starey, the First Secretary at the Australian Embassy, visited Bali, Flores and Timor, and spoke to Australian students who had been in Lombok. He heard first-hand accounts of the killings by people who had participated in them, and in Flores even saw victims’ heads on spikes in some villages. Starey noted that the Army was in control of the proceedings. The Australian Embassy and Department of External Affairs made it clear they were satisfied with these events. In early October 1965, Ambassador Shann cabled the Department saying that it was ‘now or never’, and that he ‘devoutly’ hope[d]’ that ‘the Army [would] act firmly’ against the PKI. In mid-1966, Prime Minister Harold Holt expressed detached satisfaction with the pro-Western shift in Indonesian foreign and economic policy. He casually told the crowd at the Australian-American Association in New York ‘with 500,000 to one million Communist sympathisers knocked off, I think it is safe to assume a reorientation has taken place’.

As the Indonesian Army murdered hundreds of thousands of alleged PKI, the Australian Embassy maintained ties with Indonesian Army generals, discussing anti-PKI activities and ways Australia could assist the Army in its transition to power. A cable from November 12th 1965 shows Ambassador Shann discussed the Army’s anti-Communist campaign and Australia’s military campaign in Borneo to defend the newly created Malaysia against Indonesian aggression with the Undersecretary from the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dr A.Y. Helmi.

Helmi requested Australian and British troops restrict all patrols and activities in Borneo, so the Indonesian Army could deal with the Communists. Shann reassured Helmi that the Army was ‘completely safe in using their forces for whatever purposes they saw fit’, knowing those forces would be used to attack PKI members and allies.

The biggest role Australia played in the 1965-66 massacres of the PKI was through broadcasting and supporting Indonesian Army propaganda. In the weeks that followed the attempted coup, the Indonesian Army seized control of virtually all of Indonesia’s media, and began an aggressive and pervasive anti-PKI campaign which spread disinformation aimed at discrediting and dehumanising the communists.

...

Australia’s actions as an accomplice to these killings should not be exaggerated. The massacres of the PKI took place against the backdrop of years of tension and hatred between the Army and the PKI, in a complex internal political environment that would have seen the killings take place regardless of any role Australia might have played. Fifty years later, those who committed the atrocities have never been brought to justice. Denial of the killings is rife. Where it is acknowledged, the perpetrators are admired as heroes who saved the nation from a Communist menace. As activist groups across Indonesia struggle to cut through the propaganda and spread the truth about the massacres of the PKI, it is important that Australia’s role in these events is understood.

Marlene Millott is a Research Assistant at Monash University. She was a recipient of the Euan Crone Asian Awareness Scholarship in 2014. This article is based on the thesis completed for her Masters in Journalism and International Relations. This article can be republished with attribution under a Creative Commons Licence.

Published October 2, 2015


http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australian_outlook/australias-role-in-the-1965-66-communist-massacres-in-indonesia/


-------/\/\/

http://socialistworker.org/2015/12/10/indonesias-massacres-on-trial

Indonesia's massacres on trial

Janis Hooper reports on a tribunal into the crimes committed in Indonesia in 1965-68, in an article written for the Australian socialist newspaper Red Flag.


December 10, 2015

EXTRACTS

"Fifty years ago, the Indonesian army, led by Gen. Suharto, used an alleged coup attempt by the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) as a pretext to mount a savage right-wing seizure of power.

Starting on October 1, 1965, at least 500,000 people were murdered and millions were imprisoned without trial in appalling conditions for up to 20 years. Many were subjected to torture--including rape and other sexual violence--forced labor and exile."

...
United States, the UK and Australia
charged with conspiracy for role

in facilitating commission of these crimes
...

"established that the state of Indonesia during the relevant period through its military and police arms committed and encouraged the commission of these grave human rights violations on a systematic and widespread basis."

"done for political purposes: to annihilate the PKI and those alleged to be its members or sympathizers, as well as a much broader number of people including [former President] Sukarno loyalists, trade unionists and teachers."

"design was also to prop up a dictatorial violent regime"

"It cannot be doubted that these acts, evaluated separately and cumulatively, constitute crimes against humanity, both in International Law and judged by the values and the legal framework of the new reformist era  ..."

"The tribunal called on the Indonesian government to implement the recommendations (to take action to find justice and provide reparations for the 1965 crimes against humanity) made by both its own Commission for Violence against Women in 2007, and Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) in 2012 after hearing representatives of both bodies; and for Indonesia's President Joko Widodo to deliver on his electoral promise to act."

http://socialistworker.org/2015/12/10/indonesias-massacres-on-trial

-------/\/\/


http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/11/10/government-brushes-hague-tribunal-1965-massacre.html
 

Government brushes off Hague tribunal on 1965 massacre

thejakartapost.com, Jakarta | National
Tue, November 10 2015, 12:31 PM


The government has refused to acknowledge the International People's Tribunal 1965, being held in The Hague, the Netherlands, saying that Indonesia works on its own justice system.

Attorney General HM Prasetyo refused to accept the mass killings of 1965 and 1966 being brought before a tribunal overseas.

"We solve our own issues. There is no need for other parties to be involved in this," he told kompas.com.

He said the government was making continued efforts to resolve past human rights violations, however, there had faced difficulties in finding evidence and witnesses to testify.

Questioning sessions and early investigations conducted by the National Commission of Human Rights (Komnas HAM) could not yet be brought to the full investigation stage he said.

"The government is trying to resolve the violations through reconciliation, but there are so many things to discuss and prepare," Prasetyo said.

State Secretary Pratikno said the government was working to prepare a systematic solution for the human rights violations.

"President [Joko Widodo] directed us to [work] based on our own justice system," he said.

The international tribunal, initiated by human rights activists, is being held from Nov. 10 to 13, marking the 50th anniversary of the massacre of up to 1 million considered members or supporters of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI).

Coordinating Political, Legal and Security Affairs Minister Luhut Binsar Panjaitan also questioned the people's tribunal, claiming it was unjust.

"Who do they want to try? How can they make a decision about our [case]?" he said.

Nursyahbani Katjasungkana, the general coordinator of the International People's Tribunal 1965 earlier announced that there would be seven judges, six international prosecutors and 16 witnesses taking part in the tribunal.

She urged the government to apologize as the first step toward recognizing the crimes committed by a past government, and also take into account the recommendations resulting from the tribunal. (rin)(+)


http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/11/10/government-brushes-hague-tribunal-1965-massacre.htm


-------/\/\/

http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/international-court-revisits-indonesias-1965-mass-killings/

And even if the tribunal has no legal standing in Indonesia, the prosecutors are confident that it can lead to political victories in the future.

The tribunal also tackled the “complicity” of the governments of the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia in the commission of the mass crimes in 1965. A witness alleged that these governments “provided radio-communication equipment in order to facilitate communication between the troops and delivered small arms and money. They also provided lists of alleged PKI members to the Indonesian authorities.”

As expected, the Indonesian government dismissed the international tribunal as a farce. It reminded the participants that Indonesia is a sovereign nation with a functioning legal system. It also insisted that President Jokowi will not apologize for the actions of the army in 1965. Some hardliners even branded the Indonesian participants as traitors and communists.

http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/international-court-revisits-indonesias-1965-mass-killings/

-------/\/\/


BOOK


The New Rulers of the World

by John Pilger

"Pilger tackles the injustices and double standards inherent in the politics of globalization and exposes the terrible truth behind the power and wealth of states and corporations

John Pilger is one of the world’s renowned investigative journalists and documentary filmmakers. In this classic book, with an updated introduction, he reveals the secrets and illusions of modern imperialism. Beginning with Indonesia, he shows how General Suharto’s bloody seizure of power in the 1960s was part of a western design to impose a “global economy” on Asia. A million Indonesians died as the price for being the World Bank’s “model pupil.” "

source
http://www.versobooks.com/books/2153-the-new-rulers-of-the-world


---------------------- ----------------------

COMMENT


The West is responsible for facilitating murder and atrocity on a MASSIVE SCALE, yet no Westerner has been held accountable for facilitating the 'knocking off' 500,000 to a million 'communist sympathisers', in the noble endeavour to save the world from the 'horrors' freedom from economic exploitation.

It is astounding that the above writer  absolves Australia of responsibility on the following basis:

"Australia’s actions as an accomplice to these killings should not be exaggerated. The massacres of the PKI took place against the backdrop of years of tension and hatred between the Army and the PKI, in a complex internal political environment that would have seen the killings take place regardless of any role Australia might have played." [source - above]

The 'backdrop of years of tension', 'hatred' and 'complex internal political environment' could just as readily apply to the Balkans or to World War II Europe or, really, any other contest.

It looks like the attitudes, the course of action taken, and the standards applied depend entirely on who performed the deeds in question, and what is in it for the champions of global capitalism.

While Radovan Karadzic has been convicted in some US war criminal sponsored kangaroo court, knocking off half a million to a million pesky Indonesian commies happens to be just fine -- even something to be proud of, by the look of things.

The hypocrisy is breathtaking when you consider the enormity of what the West has supported here -- and this is just ONE example of murder, torture and suffering on a massive scale, in a LONG SERIES of wilful evil-doing, right around the globe, committed by those that would have us believe they are the 'righteous' among nations -- this glorious 'international community,' as they refer to their vicious, destructive coterie.

And these are the shining examples of humanity that would have us believe the Third Reich 'Nazis', and not they, are the epitome of 'evil' that was righteously conquered for the good of the entire world that our noble WWII heroes have ... *cough* ... lovingly liberated.



March 29, 2016

Karadzic will be in jail, but what about Bush, Blair, Clinton ...


Article
SOURCE
http://archive.is/drTMu


English
http://archive.is/drTMu

Original Serbian
http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Svet/561374/Karadzic-ce-u-zatvor-a-sta-cemo-sa-Busom-Blerom-Klintonom


Vesti Online

Sunday 27/03/2016.
15:51
Vestionline

Edited English Translation

*confirm original text(s) for quotation purposes

Karadzic will be in jail, but what about Bush, Blair, Clinton ...


Karadzic will be in jail, but what about Bush, Blair, Clinton ...

If you are a member of the Western alliance, you are free to commit genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity,  ... [according to] ... a writer and blogger Neil Clark. Attached to the "Rasa USA Today," Clark asks why are people responsible for much greater crimes than those for which Radovan Karadzic
was found guilty, still at large and why will they never be criminally prosecuted.

A year ago, the report "Counting Bodies", collected by international physicians, says that at least 1.3 million people died in the 'war against terrorism' led by the US in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
 
US worse than Hitler

This dreadful figure must be added the numbers killed during and after the NATO bombing in Libya (more than 50,000), with starvation due to lack of basic means of subsistence and famine. There are also those who died in the Iraq war and those who were killed by terrorists in Syria by armed and financed by the West and its regional allies.
-------/\/\/ 
The evil if you are dark-skinned, or Serbs

As regards this analyst, the International Criminal Court is biased as the Tribunal in The Hague. Before that court has so far indicted 36 accused and they are all dark-skinned Africans. White war criminals (unless they are Serbs) do not have to worry.

-------/\/\/
- In reality, the Western neo-conservatives and their allies are responsible for a large number of deaths, destruction and human suffering, even compared with the dark days of the Third Reich and Adolf Hitler. But they are not brought to trail in The Hague - said Clark and specify:

- If you no one is really above the law, then we would see George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Tony Blair and Clinton
in the courtroom; and not only Radovan Karadzic.

What is worse, Clark believes, is that the Western war lobby is trying to use the charges against Karadzic as a justification for their own bloody interventionist policy. The war in Bosnia is not, as the neoconservatives argue, an example of "what happens when the West does not intervene." In contrast, the war in BiH has caused quite excessive interference of the West.

- We should all be focusing our attention on the "evil Karadzic," but let's not go too deeply into the question of how the secessionist wars in Yugoslavia started and when he lit the fuse - says Clark.

For the US and its allies, Yugoslavia of the
1990s was the "sacrificial" country. The West has supported those who aspired to the disintegration of Yugoslavia, such as the Croatian leader Franjo Tudjman and Alija Izetbegovic in Bosnia, says Clark.

He estimated that they were much more extreme in their policy than "official specific bad guy" Slobodan Milosevic, who [was in the way with a united or federated] Yugoslavia.

During 1992, the Lisbon agreement was reached on the peaceful division of BiH and Karadzic was one of the signatories. However, the agreement has sabotaged the intervention of US Ambassador Warren Zimmerman, who asked Izetbegovic to withdraw his consent.

- This does not reduce the charges against Karadzic for his later actions, but without the intervention Zimmerman, it is likely that the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina could have been avoided - Clark notes and points:

...

Does anyone really can not believe that Karadzic would have faced with 40 years of imprisonment had he served US interests in the Balkans? 

Indonesian dictator General Suharto committed not one, but two massacres during his career and the number of those killed exceeded one million, but he died a free man after 86 years. Unlike Karadzic, Suharto was a favorite of the US State Department, said Clark.

- International Tribunal for War Crimes in the former Yugoslavia is very good on the radio judgments against Serbs, but declined to file charges against leaders and officials of NATO for war crimes committed during the illegal bombardment of Yugoslavia in 1999. When asked why the court does not consider the crimes of NATO, former Chief Prosecutor of the Hague Tribunal Carla Del Ponte replied that it was then "perfect justice".

Part of the problem for indictment against Western leaders, Clark thinks, is that the International Criminal Court
has not adopted an amendment to its Rome Statute to come under the jurisdiction of the "war of aggression".  [comment:   see below]

- What we have now is a system of international justice, according to which those who commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, are prosecuted only if they are "official enemy" the United States, but those who start wars are protected with immunity. 

So Karadzic, who, according to the indictment responsible for the deaths of several thousand people, was sentenced to 40 years in prison, while those responsible for several million dead, after initiating the wars of  aggression, remain free to enrich themselves and to begin new military conflicts. - Indicates Clark for "Rasa USA Today". 




---------------------- ----------------------

COMMENT


If one subscribes to what is, presumably (and ostensibly), a 'universal justice' ideal -- upon which is based, the establishment  of supranational bodies with jurisdiction over the free peoples of sovereign, foreign nations in the name of the concept known as 'international law' -- then the real problem here is that this is a 'universal justice' court which has no teeth and, furthermore, that this cannot be remedied without a serious military challenger willing to invoke the threat of military might to coerce the powers that be, should they play unfair (as they do) ... so it's yet another joke institution, to be manipulated by the powerful at the expense of the weak in geopolitical terms:

(a) the Western camp (effectively, under protection of the military might of USA) and Israel have 'unsigned' themselves from the Rome Statute, & USA holds financial & trade powers over less powerful nations outside the aggressive Western & Middle Eastern coterie seeking global hegemony;

(b) the US has threatened less powerful nations with sanctions should they fail bow to the US (and associates') demand  for impunity to commit war crimes.   

(c) more significantly, USA has threatened military action against any country that attempts to bring the US & its accomplices to account for war crimes.

Finally, all things are not & cannot be 'universal' or 'equal' -- ever.  Nor should they be.

Therefore this is a faulty doctrine.





American Aggression, Propaganda, Serbia & NATO

American Aggression
Propaganda, NATO &
SERBIA


1999

SERBIA

SERBIA
 
Madeleine Albright
Former US Secretary of State
under Bomber Bill Clinton
named like operations are named
some fake euphemism
for something that is, in reality,
its opposite

38,400 sorties
10,484 strike sortie
78 days destruction

Special Place in Hell


SERBIA
SERBIA
2014
US Academic
Former US Ambassador to Russia

RT News


SERBIA

SERBIA

SERBIA






Kangaroo Court Convicts Karadzic


https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337162-karadzic-convicted-crimes-court/

Kangaroo court convicts Karadzic


Published time: 25 Mar, 2016 10:11


By convicting Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic of genocide and crimes against humanity, the war crimes tribunal in The Hague is not bringing peace, reconciliation or closure – but a cynical victor’s justice, an endorsement of ‘might makes right.’

According to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Karadzic was found guilty of ten out of eleven counts of the original indictment, including the so-called “genocide” of an estimated 8,000 Muslims in Srebrenica and the “joint criminal enterprise” to create an ethnically pure “Greater Serbia” on the ruins of Yugoslavia.

Thursday’s verdict surprised precisely no one. The ICTY was pretty much created to prosecute Karadzic – or rather, the complete Serb political and military leadership during the Wars of Yugoslav Succession in the 1990s. The very purpose of the ad-hoc tribunal, a brainchild of the Clinton administration’s “human rights interventionists,” was to deny any legal legitimacy to the Serbs, while bestowing it on the US and its regional clients and proxies.

While Germany was the principal outside backer of the governments in Slovenia and Croatia when they sought to secede from Yugoslavia in 1991, by the following year that role was taken over by Washington. Embracing the narrative of “democratic” Slovenes, Croats and others waging the righteous fight against “Communist Serbian aggression,” the US backed the Muslims in Bosnia in reneging on the power-sharing agreement with the republic’s Christian majority.

Both Serbs and Croats took up arms in response. By 1994, however, the US had midwifed an alliance between the Croats and Muslims, and later arranged for the Serb leadershipcivilian president Radovan Karadzic and military commander Ratko Mladic – to be indicted for genocide and war crimes.

A major feature of US intervention in the Balkans was the way in which it bypassed, co-opted or sidelined the United Nations. While insinuating NATO into the UN mission until it finally took over, Washington systematically torpedoed peace talks until it could hijack the process with a self-appointed “contact group” and stage the end of the Bosnian War in Dayton, Ohio in 1995.
    The Dayton miracle: Bosnia armistice, still alive at 20 (Op-Edge) https://t.co/nlH7ykhrizpic.twitter.com/ZVEHSOaCkQ
    — RT (@RT_com) November 21, 2015
One key element in the process was the US-inspired creation of the ad-hoc tribunal in May 1993. Yes, it was established by the UN Security Council, in Resolution 827. However, the Security Council claimed to act under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, allowing the creation of “measures to maintain or restore international peace and security.” The very inception of the ICTY required stretching the definition of “measures” to include judicial power the UNSC clearly lacked – and therefore could not delegate.

Even if the tribunal were perfectly legitimate to begin with, its pattern of indictments should have been a signal something was amiss. The ICTY and its backers clearly believed any Serb atrocities were systematic and deliberate, while those committed by anyone else were random or incidental. While every single senior Serb official in present-day Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia was hauled before the court, only a few lower-level Croat, Bosnian Muslim or Albanian officials were even indicted – and most of them were acquitted outright, or on appeal. Only Serbs were charged with genocide – by definition, a systematic crime. Only Serbs were accused of a "joint criminal enterprise," a category specifically constructed for the tribunal by a US jurist.

On May 27, 1999, two months into the illegal NATO war against Yugoslavia, the Tribunal indicted Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic for war crimes and genocide. In July that year, the very same tribunal decided NATO’s declaration it was not guilty of anything was good enough, and merited no further investigation.

“NATO countries are those that have provided the finance to set up the Tribunal, we are amongst the majority financiers… so let me assure that we and the Tribunal are all one on this, we want to see war criminals brought to justice and I am certain that when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage,” NATO spokesman Jamie Shea told reporters on May 17, 1999. Telling enough?

Milosevic was arrested in 2001 by a government installed in a US-backed coup, which sent him to The Hague via extrajudicial rendition. He died in March 2006, under mysterious circumstances, before the trial could be concluded.


On July 11, 2013 – a date deliberately chosen to coincide with the alleged “genocide” in Srebrenica – the ICTY rejected Karadzic’s motion to dismiss the charges. Among the “evidence” cited by US judge Theodor Meron was a hearsay claim that Karadzic had decided “in the early 1990s” to kill a third of the Muslims, convert a third to Orthodoxy, while the rest would leave on their own.

While such a plan did exist, it was the brainchild of the WW2 Nazi-allied Croatian government, and its intended targets were Serbs living in present-day Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The ICTY was accusing the Serbs of doing what was actually done to them 70 years prior – and when Karadzic tried to argue the point, the prosecutors dismissed WW2 as ancient history.

Wednesday’s revelation by Peter Robinson, Karadzic’s legal adviser, that the prosecution chose to share 200-plus pages of exculpatory evidence less than 24 hours before the verdict, is the perfect illustration of how the Tribunal has mocked the rules of due process.

    Just rec'd 208 pages of exculpatory material in #Karadzic case from #ICTY prosecution this afternoon. Seriously, prosecutors?
    — Peter Robinson (@PeterRobinICTY) March 23, 2016

Ironically, the one count on which Karadzic was acquitted demonstrates that the black-robed enablers of “bombs for peace” can’t stomach some of their own nonsense. They ruled that atrocities in seven municipalities did not quite rise to the level of genocide, as they could find no proof of intent. Yet they continued to maintain that what allegedly happened in Srebrenica in 1995 met the definition – because they had to, as “Srebrenica” has become the universal excuse for “humanitarian” mass murder.

“The falseness of the entire situation here defies description,” Karadzic said in his opening defense statement. Thursday, he was proven right.

Nebojsa Malic for RT


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337162-karadzic-convicted-crimes-court/
---------------------- ----------------------




SERBIA


COMMENT


This show trial public-relations symbolic cleansing of  the bloodied hands of the (Anglo) American empire was set up by a mercantile state whose front-end 'leaders' think nothing of killing half a million Iraqi children and dropping depleted uranium bombs on civilians abroad.
THE KANGAROO COURTS ARE BOTH A SYMBOLIC CLEANSING OF BLOOD FROM AMERICAN-ANGLO HANDS & A PRAGMATIC GENERAL CONTROL STRATEGY THAT'S DESIGNED TO:
1.  ELIMINATE THE POLITICAL AND MILITARY LEADERSHIP OF A NATION:  THUS TO WEAKEN THEIR TARGET/CONQUEST.  IT MAKES EASY PREY -- IT'S LIKE HYENAS MOVING IN FOR THE KILL.  ONLY THESE BLOATED HYENAS CONTROL FINANCE & HAVE THE MEANS TO TAKE DOWN THE STRONG, TO THEN PREY ON THE UNPROTECTED WEAK, FOR GENERATIONS.
2. DESIGNED TO INTIMIDATE THOSE THAT THE MERCANTILE EMPIRE WISHES TO IMPRESS WITH ITS MIGHT, PROBABLY TO PREVENT THEIR VASSALS FROM EVER CHALLENGING THE GREEDY EMPIRE.
3.  JUST AS CREATION OF 'OFFICIAL ENEMIES' IS PRE-AGGRESSION PROPAGANDA PROVIDING PRETEXT FOR INTENDED ATTACK, IN THE AFTERMATH OF ILLEGAL ATTACK, IT PAYS TO CREATE A SUPREME 'VILLAIN' TO PROSECUTE FOR UNSPEAKABLE 'ATROCITIES' ... TO GIVE THE AGGRESSIVE STATE 'JUSTIFICATION' FOR ATROCITIES IT HAS COMMITTED IN PURSUIT OF ITS STRATEGIC AND, ULTIMATELY, PROFIT-MAKING AIMS.
4.  FOOL THE EXPLOITED MASSES, AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF THEIR MASTERS.
SO OF COURSE THEY CHOSE A 'SIGNIFICANT' DATE TO GET THE MAXIMUM PR VALUE FOR THEIR PR BUCK AND FOR THE SHAM TRIAL THEY PAID FOR IN ADVANCE. 

BY MAKING THE OTHER THE VILLAIN ONE CASTS ONESELF TO PLAY ACT THE 'SAINT' AND 'CHAMPION' OF PRINCIPLES & IDEALS ONE PROFESSES TO DEFEND, & THEREFORE THOSE ONE OSTENSIBLY PERSONALLY UPHOLDS & VALUES, AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD PRESUME.
BUT THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE:  AND ESPECIALLY NOT TRUE IN THE CASE OF THE STATE BUILT ON GREED & SOCIOPATHY.
HOW MANY BOMBS HAVE THEY DROPPED, HOW MANY CIVILIANS HAVE THEY KILLED, HOW MANY HAVE THEIR SANCTIONS KILLED, HOW MANY DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENTS HAVE THEY DEPOSED, HOW MANY DESPOTS HAVE THEY INSTALLED, HOW MANY WERE KILLED AND RAPED BECAUSE OF THEIR INTERVENTIONS, & HOW MUCH MISERY HAVE THEY INFLICTED ON PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD -- IN THE NAME OF PROFIT.
IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT WHAT THEY PROFESS IS AN OUTRAGEOUS & OBSCENE LIEIT'S FOOLING THE IGNORANT MASSES THAT COUNTS.

The closest this obscene state has come to being held accountable for its worldwide genocidal spree, is having had just *some* of its representatives convicted in absentia in Malaysia in 2012.


DESTRUCTION
OF EUROPE
THE END OF
EUROPEAN MAN
Over the last 70 years the Anglo-Americans have been destroying Europe and, right now, the despotic financial alliance is targeting Russia with economic and other sanctions, in an attempt to weaken the only strong and independent nation in Europe.

* Don't bother counting the likes of Germany:  the Germans are still under occupation since WWII.  Germany has not been a sovereign state since WWII.

*The French, Italians, Spanish, Swedish etc. are destroying not only their own countries, they are destroying the whole of Europe.
Europeans must resist this destruction of their heritage.

SERBIA 

"U.S. bombers wrote graffiti on this unexploded bomb in Kraljevo: “Do you still wanna be a Serb now!!”
NATO SCUM
LOW I.Q.
MONGREL BASTARDS
'Brave men'
Sending Children
Graffiti Bombs

[source: ibid]


-------/\/\/

SERBIA

What kind of spineless
CIA shill politician
lowlifes
sign a deal with 'NATO'
profiteering mongrel
murderers
of Serbian people?
What kind of low dogs are these politicians?
Low politician whores
on their knees
GAVE ILLEGAL BOMBER
AMERICANS IMMUNITY!
SERBIA
NATO stole your land
SERBIA
NATO stole your heritage
SERBIA
NATO murdered SERBIANS
SERBIA
NATO violated

international law

TO KILL YOUR PEOPLE
SERBIA
American
War criminals

ARE FREE


SERBIA
American
War criminals
Convict son of Serbia
KARADZIC


SERBIA
SERBIA
Nothing can justify this dishonour:  the politicians in Serbia need to be removed.

 --------/\/\/
SERBIA

"Serbia’s pro-Russian parties have asked for a referendum to be held together with the general elections over Belgrade’s potential membership in NATO.

The pro-Russia politicians believe that if populists remain in office after the elections, they will go ahead with NATO membership and will also join the West’s sanctions against Moscow over Ukraine."

Vladimir Putin



Google - YouTube
Filthy Censoring, Harassing
Corporate America
US State Dept. Embedded C*NTS
LINK | Censored by C*nts



Vladimir Putin






WATCH VIDEO - LINK BELOW




---------------------- ----------------------


Getting my Putin fetish fix ... :)






Meanwhile in Serbia ...







Americans Ensure
US Regime
is Not Held Accountable
for US War Crimes

America's illegal wars: Kosovo & Iraq
LINK | Post


USA 'UNSIGNS' - ROME STATUTE - ICC
LINK | Post




.... meanwhile in Serbia


SERBIA
10,000 supporters of the Serbian Radical Party
on Belgrade's Republic Square
mark the 17th anniversary
of bombing of Yugoslavia
by  North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

also
opposition to
International Criminal Tribunal (ICC)
verdict & sentencing
former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic
to 40 years in prison for genocide and war crimes




---------------------- ----------------------