Thomas Drake Interview - Transcripts - Series of Five (5)

Espionage Act Case USA (One of Few) Thomas Drake US Air Force / short stint CIA  /  US Navy veteran ex NSA / computers / whistleblower   "I flew in RC-135s, listening in on the Warsaw Pact. I became--the target country in which I became an expert as a crypto linguist was East Germany." " ... says he was targeted by the NSA because he exposed that the agency had intel that could have prevented the 9/11 attacks and because he blew the whistle on a massive secret surveillance program aimed at Americans -   August 2, 2015" "In 2010 the government alleged that he 'mishandled' documents, one of the few such Espionage Act cases in U.S. history. His defenders claim that he was instead being persecuted for challenging the Trailblazer Project."  [therealnews] Transcript Interview #1 - http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14393 Transcript Interview #2 - http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14395 Transcript Interview #3 - http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14399 Transcript Interview #4 - http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14405 Transcript Interview #5 - http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14423 ---------------------- ꕤ  ---------------------- SUMMARY Part 1 NSA Key stakeholder = Congress, particularly the intelligence committees   Raised objections to NSA having knowledge re  9/11 & not making use of that knowledge to prevent 9/11 Objections internal - then public. Waste of multibillion-dollar mass surveillance program / he thought violated the Fourth Amendment USA - dragnet electronic surveillance indicted whistleblower  /  no prison NSA - had 9/11 knowledge  / at issue what NSA actually knew what they should have known what they didn't share what they kept hidden info they never even discovered until later   "I consider NSA quite culpable.  ... extraordinarily culpable. And they've been covering up their culpability ever since" *NSA did not not share intel properly with national command authorities massive multibillion-dollar fraud   mass surveillance regime put into place in the deepest of secrecy NSA didn't like Drake 'speaking truth to power" - witness various investigations. 2007 FBI raid of house and office (National Defence University). Indictment   "I was very publicly indicted on a ten felony count indictment, five under the Espionage Act, facing 35 years in prison." April 2010 was an exciting month: April 5th, 2010 - here WikiLeaks releases Collateral Murder video April 15, 2010 - here Thomas Drake indicted "DRAKE:  My eyes were wide open coming into NSA. Some people have this idea that somehow I was naive coming into NSA. In fact, I was actually--my sanity was questioned as to whether or not I really wanted to join NSA. JAY: And your first day of the NSA is actually 9/11. DRAKE: First day I reported. I actually took the oath prior. It was all in processing. But the first day that I reported to my new job was the morning of 9/11." Post 9/11 US govt operating in equivalent of secret marital law "verbal authority from the White House, authorizing NSA to start spying on the U.S. on an extraordinary scale, starting with phone numbers and special arrangements of certain telephone companies, starting with AT&T" " ... eyewitness to the subversion of the Constitution. " Oath to defend "Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic." [NSA] "... had what they call cast-iron coverage on the Yemeni switchboard, the safe house. They'd been monitoring that safe house since at least 1996. It's an absolute lie of the U.S. government to say that we didn't know about the two hijackers in San Diego, for example. Absolute lie." "... when confronted with the prospect of fessing up, NSA chose instead to obstruct the 9/11 congressional investigation, play dumb, and keep the truth buried, including the fact that it knew about all inbound and outbound calls to the safe house switchboard in Yemen. " ---------------------- ꕤ  ---------------------- COMMENT That's it for my lame summary. I'm not really into the 9/11 stuff and I'm not up for the summary of another 4 parts of the interview. Thought it was good to post here for anybody who might be more interested than I am. Might just quickly skim a few more bits of the interviews to see if there's anything earth-shattering in them that I might otherwise miss.  lol ꕤ

Walter Lippmann

WALTER LIPPMANN Walter Lippmann b.1889-d.1974 Journalist, a media critic, amateur philosopher WWI - Capitan US army Served intelligence division of American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), France Spin-doctor / adviser to President Woodrow Wilson In terms of censorship, Lippmann was not an absolute defender of the free speech doctrine; although he considered that there were dangers of suppression and cautioned against permitting censorship by a censor who was not aware of those dangers or tolerant of free speech. Coined phrase  "cold war" (1947 book of that title).  Every time we hear that expression (and we hear it quite a lot now that the neo-cons are stirring up aggression against Russia), we can think of dear old proto neo-con, Walter Lippmann. Coined term:  "stereotype". News and truth were not synonymous (analogous, corresponding) to Lippmann. Lippmann:  "function of news is to signalize an event, the function of truth is to bring to light the hidden facts, to set them in relation with each other, and make a picture of reality on which men can act." Journalist's 'truth' is subjective.  It is also limited to how the journalist constructs his reality. So news is: "imperfectly recorded". Lippman did not consider news/journalism as:  "an organ of direct democracy” Gather he did not see it as playing a role in democracy, but it's hard to say without reading further. Lippmann believed that voters: = ignorant re issues & policies. = lacked competence to participate in public life. = cared little for participating in political process. Book 'Public Opinion' 1922, Lippmann wrote that: "a "governing class" must rise to face the new challenges." and he considered it "possible to sanitize polluted information". Lippmann contended that:  functioning on an unconscious 'seeing through stereotypes' basis resulted in our being subjected to partial truths. Therefore, according to Lippmann, the idea of the public being equipped (or competent) to direct public affairs is a "false ideal." Political savvy of an average man = "theatre-goer walking into a play in middle of the third act and leaving before the last curtain." On mass culture, in his book Public Opinion (1922), Lippmann said: mass man functioned as a "bewildered herd" mass man must be governed by "a specialized class whose interests reach beyond the locality" elite class of intellectuals and experts were to be a machinery of knowledge purpose of the elite class of 'experts':  to circumvent the main defect of democracy:  the "omni-competent citizen" ideal. Lippmann's attitude, by the standards of the 1920s, was considered liberal. Liberal because it was, according to Wikipedia, "endorsing the continuation of civil society rather than populist fascism."  Hmmmm, so compared to some whacky extreme where you have no rights, this is a 'liberal' stand ... if you don't mind not knowing that you have no say. 1946 -  Lippmann leading public advocate of: need to respect a Soviet sphere of influence in Europe versus containment strategy OMG!  Nothing's changed:  neo-cons are pushing for NATO 'containment' to this day. "Manufacture of Consent" was one of Lippmann's catch phrases (used by Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman, in their book of same name). Similar views to Gabriel Almond, American political scientist (and WWII war office analyst of propaganda). Almond-Lippmann consensus on these points: Public opinion is volatile, shifting erratically in response to the most recent developments ... Public opinion is incoherent, lacking an organized or a consistent structure ... Public opinion is irrelevant to the policy-making process. Political leaders ignore public opinion because most Americans can neither "understand nor influence the very events upon which their lives and happiness are known to depend." So that's Walter Lippmann.  Really detested him reading this. His only saving grace is that he wasn't on the 'containment' of Russia bandwagon. See Lippmann as the typical neo-con NGO, USG revolving door, spin doctor that tells us how to think today. ---------------------------------- Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Lippmann