TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Transparency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transparency. Show all posts

January 17, 2016

Corrupt Butthole British Undemocratic State - Writes the Rules of Political Persecution



Butthole
BRITISH UNDEMOCRATIC STATE
Writes the Rules
of
Political Persecution
FREE ASSANGE



18 December 2015

British Home Office
www.gov.UK/homeoffice

https://govwaste.co.uk/

[CLICK image for clarity / enlargement]
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

re:

EXTENSIVE
ONGONG
COST

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
  • covert police activity
  • uniformed policing op
at Embassy Ecuador
(period sought:  19/06/ 2012 to 10/2015)


FREEDOM OF INFO
REQUEST
PURSUANT TO

Freedom of Information
Act (2000)
('the Act')

UNDEMOCRATIC
British State
NOTIFIES GOVT:
WILL NOT

PROVIDE INFORMATION
SOUGHT PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC INTEREST
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
FREEDOM OF INFO LAWS
VITAL TO MAINTAINING GOVT. ACCOUNTABILITY

Thus said government
REFUSES
  • to PROVIDE info requested
  • to INDICATE if info is held


Same CORRUPT government
that writes the laws
has absolved itself of
this vital obligation
INCUMBENT upon 
the 'democratic' state

THUS the
Butthole British State
has REFUSED
to remain accountable
& transparent to the public
it purportedly serves


the dodgy
BUTTHOLE BRITISH STATE
has absolved itself
of being held accountable

by virtue of passing LAWS
in favour of state institutions

controlled by corrupt government



ALL in pursuit of
maintaining
STATE POWER 
exercised on behalf
of elite interests
whom corrupt Butthole government
actually serves at all times
 

THEREFORE

CORRUPT BUTTHOLE BRITISH GOVERNMENT 
is not obliged
to provide the voting public
(that it pretends to represent)
with vital information
(& thus transparency demanded by democracy)

owing to the SPECIAL PERMISSION 
the said
CORRUPT BUTTHOLE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
HAS GIVEN ITSELF
UNDER  
Sections 23(5) & 31(3) of the Act


UNDEMOCRATIC DENIAL
of information committed

Ad Absurdum

JUSTIFICATION

UNDER GUISE
& PRETEXT pertaining to:
  • bodies dealing with security matters S.23(5)
  • for purpose of safeguarding national security S.24(2)
  • prevention of 'prejudice' of law enforcement S.31(3)

which are the
very Butthole British bodies
that are also involved in the
POLITICAL PERSECUTION


of Australian journalist,
publisher of WikiLeaks,
Julian Assange

publications that exposed
USA, British
& Allied Government
Wrongdoings
& WAR CRIMES


 

BUTTHOLE BRITISH STATE
SELF-EXEMPTION
from public accountability

Sections 24 & 31 of the Act
EXEMPT
the undemocratic, 
politically-persecuting state

from the 'public interest test'
re disclosure of info

& allow the corrupt state to rely upon


DENYING government transparency
to the voting stakeholder public,
whom the state pretends 
to represent ...


& fervently pretends to do so, just prior to mock 'democratic' ELECTIONS


CORRUPT
POLITICALLY PERSECUTING
BUTTHOLE BRITISH STATE
HAS PERMITTED ITSELF
TO DENY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION


on the following smart-ass basis:

BRITISH
MINISTRY OF TRUTH
to 'neither confirm nor deny'
existence of information



Butthole British Home Office

Corrupt British State

Typically hiding behind 'Security' bodies 

that have nothing to do with actual state security & everything to do with shielding state wrongdoings & preserving the interests of the elites that control the state, and a state that pretends to exist to serve the interests of the masses -- the masses that the state & the elites partner to exploit  ...



the very 'Security bodies'
that 'SEXED UP'  info re Iraq
to ensure that Britain would COMMIT
ILLEGAL INVASION OF IRAQ
at British taxpayer & other expense


Section 23 under the Act

permits the corrupt state
to hide behind 'security matters'
that shield its corrupt institutions
(ie including bodies dealing with 'security matters')
from democratic, public scrutiny

& the corrupt, politically persecuting
DEMOCRACY DENYING
TOTALITARIAN state
acting on behalf elite interests
has thus
ABSOLUTELY
EXEMPTED
itself
from public interest considerations
under the joke Act



... any time it is politically convenient

to conceal (or commit)

wrongful, undemocratic & otherwise unjust or illegal deeds

by a Butthole British State
merely PRETENDING to serve:
justice
&
democracy

BUTTHOLE BRITISH
GOVERNMENT
pretending 
to represent

interests of the people 

AND pretending
to be accountable
 to the people


The same
BUTTHOLE BRITISH GOVERNMENT

which is publicly elected and therefore legally & otherwise obligated to serve public interests: 

but judging by Butthole British government neglect, violations

(including political policing & record of political police RAPING activist members of the public ... no, I'm not kidding)
-- along with a litany of other violations of decency, democracy, law and justice --
the indication is that state 'serving the public' ideal is far from reality.


EXAMPLE

British Crown
Prosecution Service
'justice'

ie. DENIAL OF JUSTICE 
[CLICK image for clarity / enlargement]
[CLICK image for clarity / enlargement]


THE TRUE FACE
OF THE
BUTTHOLE BRITISH
UNDEMOCRATIC STATE


The State

v.

UK miners' strike
miners at British Steel
coking plant
South Yorkshire, 1984
Battle of Orgreave
 
& Other British Public Protests










LINK | More


Metropolitan Police Service ('MPS')
aka 'the Met' (informal)

territorial police force
law enforcement:  Greater London

City of London square mile
responsibility of:  City of London Police
{not MPS}

MPS comprised of 32:
Borough Operational Command Units

Ministry of Defence police MoD property throughout UK
/ HQ Whitehall & other MOD establishments

British Transport Police
policing:  rail network, incl. London

Royal Parks Constabulary
merged with MPS 2004
parks policed by:  Royal Parks Ops Command Unit
{plus small park police council maintains}

MPS officers have legal jurisdiction
throughout all of England and Wales
incl. areas w/ special police forces, eg MoD
{likewise for all officers of territorial police}
/ also have limited power Scotland & Northern Ireland

The serious inquiries go to MPS
{ eg terrorism, complex murder }
with assistance fro relevant specialist force(s)
even if MoD or railway incident location

Royal Exception
officers involved in protection of royalty
& other VIPs
have full police powers in Scotland & Northern Ireland
(in connection w/ such duties)

RANKS

  • Commissioner
  • Deputy Commissioner
  • Assistant Commissioner
  • Deputy Assistant Commissioner
  • Commander
  • Chief Superintendent
  • Superintendent
  • Chief Inspector
  • Inspector
  • Sergeant
  • Police Constable
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COST TO TAXPAYER 2011/12

MPS total expenditure:
£3,692 million
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

MPS Established:
Metropolitan Police Act 1929

est. 1829
by Robert Peel
known as:  the 'bobbies'


55,000:  officers, staff, traffic wardens, community support officers & volunteers (2016 figure, MPS site)

controlling:  7 million Londoners, commuters & visitors

over:  620 square miles (997.7 km square)

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Robert Peel
one of founders of:  Conservative Party
father of modern British police

b. Lancashire
son of wealthy textile manufacturer & parliamentarian

Peel issued:   Tamworth Manifesto
comprising principles re basis of modern 

British Conservative Party

education:  Oxford + other

Entry to politics at age 21
as MP for Irish rotten borough of Cashel, Tipperary

rotten borough
=  existence prior to the Reform Act 1832

parliamentary borough
= town with royal charter granting it incorporation
= right to send x2 elected burgesses as Members Parliament, House of Commons



Butthole British Elites - Bribery


Constituencies electing members
to House of Commons
remained same for centuries
/ did not reflect population shifts


--> electors so few some places
--> electors could be bribed by wealthy patron
--> known as:  'Rotten Boroughs' (inf.)
--> aka 'Pocket Boroughs' (inf.)
--> aka 'Nomination Boroughs'



electors voting as patron instructed them
voting by show of hands, so none dare vote contrary

Peel:  created
modern Conservative Party
on ruins of 'old Toryism'
PM of UK (twice)
  • 1834-1835
  • 1841-1846
Home Secretary (twice)
  • 1822-1827
  • 1828-1830



[Wikipedia + MPS site]



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------


That's pretty much how I understood that Butthole British government notice, denying information on the costs of persecuting journalist, Julian Assange.
Peel & the Conservatives sound interesting.   I'm guessing Peel is an example of who rules Britain even today.
Need to catch up with that after I figure how to prepare a chicken biryani.
This recipe looks good - here.   Looks straightforward.  Least favourite parts:  handling raw chicken & fresh chilli.  Onion slicing on big scale, not so great either ... lol.  Might do without the mint and might throw in some almond flakes & maybe some sultanas.




March 09, 2015

War in Iraq Cost Over $1.7 trillion dollars / Private Contractors PROFIT from US War: $138 billion US taxpayer to private contractors


Cheney's Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War

By Angelo Young, International Business Times

20 March 13

The accounting of the financial cost of the nearly decade-long Iraq War will go on for years, but a recent analysis has shed light on the companies that made money off the war by providing support services as the privatization of what were former U.S. military operations rose to unprecedented levels.

Private or publicly listed firms received at least $138 billion of U.S. taxpayer money for government contracts for services that included providing private security, building infrastructure and feeding the troops.

Ten contractors received 52 percent of the funds, according to an analysis by the Financial Times that was published Tuesday.

The No. 1 recipient?

Houston-based energy-focused engineering and construction firm KBR, Inc. ..., which was spun off from its parent, oilfield services provider Halliburton Co. ..., in 2007.

The company was given $39.5 billion in Iraq-related contracts over the past decade, with many of the deals given without any bidding from competing firms, such as a $568-million contract renewal in 2010 to provide housing, meals, water and bathroom services to soldiers, a deal that led to a Justice Department lawsuit over alleged kickbacks, as reported by Bloomberg.

Who were Nos. 2 and 3?

Agility Logistics ... of Kuwait and the state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corp. Together, these firms garnered $13.5 billion of U.S. contracts.

As private enterprise entered the war zone at unprecedented levels, the amount of corruption ballooned, even if most contractors performed their duties as expected.

According to the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, the level of corruption by defense contractors may be as high as $60 billion. Disciplined soldiers that would traditionally do many of the tasks are commissioned by private and publicly listed companies.

Even without the graft, the costs of paying for these services are higher than paying government employees or soldiers to do them because of the profit motive involved. No-bid contracting - when companies get to name their price with no competing bid - didn't lower legitimate expenses. (Despite promises by President Barack Obama to reel in this habit, the trend toward granting favored companies federal contracts without considering competing bids continued to grow, by 9 percent last year, according to the Washington Post.)

Even though the military has largely pulled out of Iraq, private contractors remain on the ground and continue to reap U.S. government contracts. For example, the U.S. State Department estimates that taxpayers will dole out $3 billion to private guards for the government's sprawling embassy in Baghdad.

The costs of paying private and publicly listed war profiteers seem miniscule in light of the total bill for the war.

Last week, the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University said the war in Iraq cost $1.7 trillion dollars, not including the $490 billion in immediate benefits owed to veterans of the war and the lifetime benefits that will be owed to them or their next of kin.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/308-12/16561-focus-cheneys-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-iraq-war


COMMENT

The things that stood out for me are:


War in Iraq cost $1.7 trillion dollars
PLUS $490 billion in immediate benefits owed to veterans
PLUS lifetime benefits owed to them or their next of kin
Privatization of US military operations rose to unprecedented levels

Private contractors (companies)
received min.  $138 billion of US taxpayer money for contracts doled out by US govt

Half (52%) of that went to 10 govt contracts

Biggest recipients:

KBR, Inc
ie parent, oilfield services provider Halliburton Co
received:  $39.5 billion in Iraq-related contracts over past decade

Agility Logistics (of Kuwait)

&  state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corp

Kuwait contractors received  $13.5 billion of US contracts (jointly)

Private enterprise entered the war zone at unprecedented levels
Amount of corruption ballooned

Costs higher than paying government employees
Professional, disciplined soldiers - displaced

No wind-back by Obama admin on doling out contracts (without public tender process) - on contrary: increase of such contracts

Iraq = private contractors remain on the ground, although US military has largely pulled out of Iraq

eg.  $3 billion taxpayer money to private guards for USG sprawling embassy in Baghdad

This is really mindblowing.  

The amount of money that is made by PRIVATE companies enriching themselves through war is staggering.

Bear in mind also, that those who PROFIT from war will lobby FOR WAR.

What is also staggering is that the functions of the US military have been farmed out.

The danger of that is lack of (a) accountability and (b) transparency.

So, really, the government is pulling a stunt where they've probably got an 'anything goes' thing happening, because what's going on is contracted and therefore beyond public scrutiny.

Hopefully, that makes sense.  I don't have a way with words.  But I hope that idea comes across.

If the military screws up, it is on government heads.  But if private contractors screw up, it is passed off as a bad apple, renamed and redeployed as a mercenary.

The 'decommissioning' of the US military for these private contractor forces or functionaries is worthwhile considering.

And there's also the costs incurred by the taxpayer funding those that:
  • do the job at higher price than professional soldiers
  • introduce corruption
  • and those that don't even compete (put in tenders)
but I think these aspects aren't half as important as the establishment of 'private' State armies and functionaries that are arm's length and beyond public accountability and scrutiny.
What's also interesting is the Kuwait profits.






August 14, 2014

OBAMA - Where's the TRANSPARENCY?



Rift grows between Obama, media as press groups blast administration ‘spin’
Published August 13, 2014
July 16, 2014: President Obama talks in the press briefing room at the White House.Reuters

While Congress is on recess and President Obama vacations in Martha's Vineyard, a coalition of free press groups is escalating an already-aggressive campaign against the Obama administration for allegedly freezing out the press and cracking down on reporters.

The flood of critical letters and petitions and statements from First Amendment groups marks a new level of tension in a relationship that for years has been deteriorating. Though Obama, as a candidate in 2008, was widely seen to enjoy favorable media treatment, his administration now is fielding accusations that it's one of the least transparent in history.

Society of Professional Journalists President David Cuillier, in a statement earlier this week, blasted the administration for what he called "excessive message management and preventing journalists from getting information on behalf of citizens."

SPJ is among the groups that's been leading the charge on the issue. Last month, more than three dozen groups, including SPJ, wrote to the White House about what they described as growing censorship throughout federal agencies.

[...]
... vowed greater transparency going forward and pointed to several steps the administration has taken: like processing more "freedom of information" requests, declassifying records and releasing information on White House visitors.

"Typical spin and response through non-response," Cuillier shot back.

He said he hopes the administration is "sincere" about being more open, "but we want action. We are tired of words and evasion."

Media groups are gearing up for another confrontation on Thursday, when they plan to present a petition with 100,000 signatures -- backed by the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Freedom of the Press Foundation and others -- to the Justice Department. It calls for the administration to halt legal action against New York Times reporter James Risen, who detailed a botched CIA effort during the Clinton administration to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Risen's reporting is at the center of criminal charges against former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling. Federal prosecutors want to force Risen to testify about his sources at Sterling's trial, and the Supreme Court recently refused to get involved in the case.

Risen argued he has a right to protect his sources' identity, either under the Constitution or rules governing criminal trials. A federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., earlier rejected Risen's bid to avoid being forced to testify.

At the same time federal prosecutors have fought Risen in court, Attorney General Eric Holder has suggested that the government would not seek to put Risen in jail should he refuse to testify as ordered.

But journalist groups want assurances. Risen also is expected to speak during a press conference at the National Press Club on Thursday afternoon.

The case follows tension last year surrounding the Justice Department's snooping on Fox News' reporter James Rosen's phone records and emails, and its seizure of AP phone records in the course of leak investigations. The controversy over those actions led to some reforms at the Justice Department.

[...]


EXTRACT ONLY  - FULL @ SOURCE







Hard to believe there's any tension b/w press and government when the mainstream press seems to always carry whatever the official government/corporate line may be (eg Ukraine reporting).