British Political Policing - 460 Political Groups Infiltrated Over 4 Decades

BRITISH POLITICAL POLICING 460 Political Groups Infiltrated Over 4 Decades London police lied about stats to get taxpayer money, probe finds Published time: 21 Jun, 2016 19:52 Edited time: 21 Jun, 2016 19:53 Police officers from London’s Met who ran an intelligence operation that infiltrated hundreds of political groups exaggerated the success of their work, according to a high-level police report. Managers of the secretive Scotland Yard unit, which is known as the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS), were found to have exaggerated the validity of intelligence obtained by undercover officers, the internal inquiry found. What’s more, the inquiry also suggested the SDS overemphasized the achievements of the unit in order to get public funding. Although the findings were sent to Metropolitan police commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe last year, they were kept secret until now, the Guardian reports. The latest report adds to mounting criticism of the British police after undercover officers infiltrated over 460 political groups spanning over four decades. Many undercover spies were found to have formed long-term relationships with women during operations and officers that gathered intelligence on relatives of the murdered teenager Stephen Laurence and families campaigning for justice, but concealed evidence in court cases. A large percentage of the officers controversially stole the identities of dead children to form their fake identities, without permission from the families of the deceased. READ MORE: Police spies ‘violated human rights’ of women tricked into sexual relationships The behavior of undercover police emerged after 2010 when journalists and political activists led investigations into events, prompting senior police figures to set up an internal inquiry in 2013, led by Derbyshire chief constable Mike Creedon. Last year, Creedon sent a “restricted” report to Hogan-Howe, outlining an update on the inquiry and was released to the Guardian through a Freedom of Information request. Creedon said there was evidence of SDS managers exaggerating their actions and achievements. “Evidence of SDS managers clearly exaggerating the involvement of SDS officers and the value of their intelligence has been discovered and certainly for the first two decades of the unit there was an annual report to the commissioner [of the Metropolitan Police] and the Home Office to ensure continued funding,” he said. Though Creedon did not provide any examples, he added: “This would not be the only occasion where members of a unit embellished their importance and success in order to secure finance.” A hearing is to be held on Wednesday to determine if police should inform parents of the dead children that their identities were stolen. While only a few names of officers who adopted these identities have been revealed, a ruling in favor of releasing the spies’ names could lead to transparency in identifying many others. https://www.rt.com/uk/347671-london-police-lied-taxpayers/ COMMENT Some 'democracy' this is.  No wonder there's never any change.  It's suppressed.

NETHERLANDS - POLICE HARASSMENT, POLITICAL POLICING & POLITICAL SUPPRESSION

Article SOURCE https://www.nordfront.se/polisen-i-nederlanderna-slar-till-mot-medborgare-som-uttryckt-sig-invandringskritiskt-pa-natet.smr NETHERLANDS POLICE HARASSMENT, POLITICAL POLICING & POLITICAL SUPPRESSION Translation from Swedish Police in the Netherlands strike against citizens who expressed themselves critical of immigration online The editorial staff By the editors, 2016-02-01 redaktionen@nordfront.se OPPRESSION. In response to Nederländares [ie Nederlander] migration resistance to police now have established ten intelligence units that monitor what citizen writes on social media. Monitoring is then followed up with home visits to the immigration critics who deemed to have gone too far. As previously reported, has experienced a number of Netherlands loud protests and riots against the planned asylum accommodation, which also resulted in a number of asylum places stopped. At the same time, is now reporting the Dutch daily NRC Trade sheet on how Dutch police recently started cracking down on people who expressed themselves critical of immigration on social media, with several named examples. Mark Jongeneel, 28 years old from the municipality of Sliedrecht, got from his mother know that he tried by two policemen who just knocked on the door and who now was on his way to his place of work. When the police confronted him in the Office where he works as they should according to the Land have expressed something along the lines of: — You tweet a lot. We have ordered to ask you to moderate your tone. Your tweets can be regarded as seditious. What Mark had done was he on Twitter had written a couple of posts that included a new planned refugee accommodation in Sliedrecht. The tone of the posts should have been along the lines of: Sliedrechts City Council will come up with a proposal to receive 250 refugees for the next two years. What a bad idea! Should we let this happen?! In another case, so wrote the 43-year mechanic Johan van Kite from the town of Kaatsheuvel, outraged on Facebook if they advertised plans to place 1200 refugees at the resort: Let these leaders risk going to hell, we're going to all of them. Later that day, he was a 20-minute police visit, in which he describes how the authoritarian police officials pointed out that he was instigating a demonstration, after which they forced him to remove it, he wrote. Since then describes John the feeling that his liberty has been limited, and that he now feels aware that police read when he writes on Facebook. What the newspaper NRC experiences from a police statement, the Dutch police in this purpose set up ten pieces of intelligence units, with Digital detectives that in real time monitoring what is written on Facebook and on Twitter where you are looking for posts as "gone too far" in his criticism of the detention centres. Police gets here its legal support in the ban against so-called hate crimes and sedition, but according to police is the limit [ie definition arbitrary] for what is illegal diffuse and constantly open to new interpretations. After that post that "gone too far" discovered helps the local police with home visits to those individuals identified by the Digital detectives. The police are the last few months have struck against a large number of Dutch people in this way. At least 20 such home visits have taken place in Leeuwarden in October last year. The same thing occurred in Enschede. And in Brabant Kaatsheuvel so have at least three persons received a visit from the police. This makes overall newspaper NRC to talk about a police state, but a police spokesman for the local police in Malden defending the newspaper its actions with that particular tolerate demonstrations, but they have to be tillståndsgivna, and that freedom of expression certainly exists, where threats to Land just been speaking of recommendations. Mark see it all as an attempt to silence him, but attests to the newspaper NRC that he does not intend to let this keep him back. Swedish https://www.nordfront.se/polisen-i-nederlanderna-slar-till-mot-medborgare-som-uttryckt-sig-invandringskritiskt-pa-natet.smr ---------------------- ---------------------- COMMENT Europe is being forcibly invaded and Europeans are being raped by political policing and by the state enforcers of the invasion of Europe policy, pursuant to European Union / NATO member elites' agenda.  The invasion of ancestral European homelands, the state political policing, the police harassment and POLITICAL SUPPRESSION is being PAID FOR by the oppressed taxpayer.

Undemocratic Swedish Regime - Stasi & Media Harassment & Censorship of Government Critics - European Rape & Genocide Agenda

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.d-intl.com/2013/12/11/analysis-stormtroopers-descend-on-sweden/?lang=en UNDEMOCRATIC Swedish Regime Stasi Harassment & Censorship of Government Critics European Rape & Genocide Agenda http://www.d-intl.com/2013/12/11/analysis-stormtroopers-descend-on-sweden/?lang=en Dispatch International ANALYSIS: Stormtroopers descend on Sweden av Redaktion    11 december, 2013 »I’m the biggest swine around here and only have sex with Jews”, read a sign hung on a woman in Nazi Germany. Now the Nazis’ apprentices in Sweden are using similar tactics to intimidate government opponents. Observers of Swedish politics have long anticipated that the country’s only oppositional party, the Sweden Democrats, would be hit with a coordinated campaign in order to wreck the party before the up-coming parliamentary elections in September. As the Sweden Democrats’ opinion polls keep rising – and are now above 12 percent – supporters of the status quo when it comes to mass immigration are clearly worried and have embarked on a campaign to take down the party. The axe is being wielded by the newspaper Expressen in collaboration with the semi-official left extremist intelligence-gathering organization, the Research Group. Their objective is to expose anonymous contributors to so-called ”hate sites” – i.e., sites that express opinions anathema to the ruling group of seven political parties or provide information that the ruling parties and their allies in the mainstream media and their far-left abettors do not want the public to know. In particular, the wrecking campaign is directed against individuals who have expressed non-state sanctioned opinions on immigration and Islam. In practice it is impossible for critics of the seven-party line to be heard in the surface media, so a great number of Swedes have tried to get their opinions across by anonymously posting them at such sites as Exponerat, Avpixlat and Fria Tider. By means of penetrating the commenting system Disqus, the Research Group has succeeded in finding the mailing addresses of these anonymous commentators and Expressen has now started publishing their names and other personal information about them. Expressen and the Research Group insist that they have broken no law in the process. Clearly, the pronouncements of some of those that have been exposed are such that no regular newspaper would print them – whether in Sweden or any other Western country. But it has to be kept in mind that these are the voices of people whose opinions have been driven underground. These are the words of those who feel desperate and who would probably have spoken in more measured tones if they had had a chance to be heard in the mainstream media. In other words, when a vast section of public opinion is excluded from being heard – as has been the case in Sweden for decades – this is what might have been expected. There can be no doubt that Expressen’s aim is to ruin the lives and careers of those it is now hanging out to dry ­– and to frighten anyone else from voicing criticism of the government’s failed immigration and integration policies. In other words, after stifling debate in the mainstream media, the Swedish political and media elite is now attempting to close the last outlets for anti-government speech. And as Avpixlat comments,  Expressen has gone far beyond merely exposing its enemies. The paper’s journalists have ”approached private individuals in their homes, their places of work and even harassing their children in school. It no longer looks like persecution –­ it is persecution.” Expressen and its far-left collaborators are of course well aware of what they are exposing their victims to: They may lose their jobs or businesses, their families and friends, they will become vulnerable to physical attacks, their homes may be wrecked – as has already happened. Some will undoubtedly despair and end up committing suicide. Penetrating the Disqus commenting system may be legal in Sweden – although Disqus has characterized the methods of the Research Group as a ”targeted attack”. In a statement dated December 10, Disqus VP Stephen Roy, describes the activities of the Research Group – ­ without directly identifying it – as a ”breach of our privacy guidelines. In all such cases, we are terminating the account.” It remains to be seen if the Research Group has acted in accordance with the Swedish rules on data confidentiality http://mitt-i-steget.blogspot.se/2013/12/negativa-beteenden-och.html. What is certain, however, is that the method of harassing private individuals in order to frighten and silence political opponents is a totalitarian tactic that has been employed by various dictatorial regimes, including the German Nazis, who used to expose German women accused of having sex with Jews. So far the campaign has worked wonderfully as the Sweden Democrats have taken the bait and started excluding party members exposed by Expressen and the Research Group. Thus the party leadership has turned against the victims of the campaign rather than against the totalitarian tactics used to paralyze it. “If you’re an idiot, country bumpkin or racist, then perhaps you think that you belong in our party”, says spokesperson Bylund to Swedish television. This initial success will undoubtedly encourage Expressen to carry on. http://www.d-intl.com/2013/12/11/analysis-stormtroopers-descend-on-sweden/?lang=en RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE Select:  'Open Link in New TAB' Use Magnifier tool for FULL ENLARGEMENT ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Filthy scumbags Expressen and Research Group (Researchgruppen) 'Stasi' would therefore be complicit in the high-jack of democracy in Sweden, the commission of totalitarian assault on Swedish individuals who are critical of Swedish government policy disaster -- criticism that the scumbag mainstream Swedish press (which is guilty of cover-up of rapes of Swedish women) & their accomplices seek to silence. By extension, these actors are therefore responsible for the ongoing rape and gang-rape of Swedish women by third world immigrants that the despicable Swedish governing cliques, bent on facilitating European rape & genocide, impose on native Swedes and the rest of Western Europe. ꕤ

Undercover British Political Police: RAPE WOMEN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNERS

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2015/12/09/undercover-policing-how-women-forced-the-police-to-own-up UNDERCOVER BRITISH POLITICAL POLICE:  RAPE WOMEN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNERS Undercover police: How women forced the Met to own up Wednesday, 9 December 2015 9:18 AM By Jenny Jones When the inquiry into undercover policing re-opens today we should congratulate several strong women. First, there are the innocent women who had their lives torn apart by police officers who deceived their way into their beds and their family lives. These women pursued a brave civil action against the Metropolitan Police and after many years forced a much-delayed and reluctant apology. Secondly, there is Doreen Lawrence, the mother of Stephen Lawrence, whose equally dogged campaign for justice was subject to police spying. And thirdly we should congratulate Theresa May, the Home Secretary, who has made some very wise decisions about policing issues within the UK, since taking on the job. The Met's apology is not only an important vindication of all these women’s hard work in identifying the officers, it exposes how it institutionally supported those officers and their behaviour for so many years. The Met financed the lies. It refused to confirm or deny the existence of these police officers. And it spent hundreds of thousands of pounds fighting the court case against the women. No disciplinary action has been taken against the senior officers who authorised this huge waste of public funds and police time and resources. So will the Met continue to spin these acts as those of a few rogue officers who formed casual sexual relationships using their undercover identities? The truth is the taxpayer funded officers to form long term emotional bonds with these women as a deliberate tactic to gain access to the network of campaigners whom they wanted to spy upon. I'm curious as to how the Met will try to justify their policy of Neither Confirm Nor Deny (NCND), as this was the brick wall which the women faced when they initially brought forward their allegations and it was this policy which forced them into taking a civil action. How could any of these women have faith in a police investigation into undercover officers where the Met wouldn’t even acknowledge that they exist? My own questions to the Mayor of London on this highlighted this inconsistency. The Met has maintained a blanket policy and has defended that position in court, but they also claim to regularly carry out risk assessments about the danger faced should officers have their identities exposed. If it does revisit risk assessments on undercover operatives, do they always find the officers would be 'placed in significant danger as a result of their identities being revealed'? If that's the case, why bother doing the risk assessments in the first place? One of the big things missing from this inquiry is what UK undercover officers were doing while working in continental Europe. This has already been raised in the German Parliament. We know that some of them operated abroad and the inquiry should assure itself that the rule- breaking which went on in the UK stopped at the English Channel. The refusal of the inquiry to look at this, despite my appeals to the Home Secretary, will leave an air of suspicion about what our police got up to on foreign soil. The Met has maintained that the Special Demonstration Squad was an aberration, which functioned outside the normal channels of accountability within New Scotland Yard. But if it was an aberration, it was an aberration that was allowed to continue for 40 years. While I would support much of the Met’s undercover work which is short term and aimed at serious crime, it’s clear it sees spying on thousands of innocent people who are involved in perfectly legitimate campaigns as a regular part of their work. I say this as someone who was labelled a domestic extremist and was on the Met database for 10 years. This was not only a waste of public funds, but damaging to the democratic process, especially when the Met Police are spying on people who are trying to hold them to account for their failures, as I was. It crosses a line to pry into the lives of campaigners who are taking court cases against them, or organising public meetings criticising their actions. There may sometimes be legitimate reasons for the Met Police to do so, but they should have to justify every action, to ensure that it isn't simply about saving themselves from public embarrassment. Baroness Jenny Jones is a Green Party peer and London Assembly member. http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2015/12/09/undercover-policing-how-women-forced-the-police-to-own-up UNDERCOVER BRITISH POLITICAL POLICE:  RAPE WOMEN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNERS Undercover police had children with activists Disclosure likely to intensify controversy over long-running police operation to infiltrate and sabotage protest groups Rob Evans and Paul Lewis Saturday 21 January 2012 07.15 AEDT Two undercover police officers secretly fathered children with political campaigners they had been sent to spy on and later disappeared completely from the lives of their offspring, the Guardian can reveal. In both cases, the children have grown up not knowing that their biological fathers – whom they have not seen in decades – were police officers who had adopted fake identities to infiltrate activist groups. Both men have concealed their true identities from the children's mothers for many years. One of the spies was Bob Lambert, who has already admitted that he tricked a second woman into having a long-term relationship with him, as part of an intricate attempt to bolster his credibility as a committed campaigner. The second police spy followed the progress of his child and the child's mother by reading confidential police reports which tracked the mother's political activities and life. [ ... ] EXTRACT - CONTINUED AT SOURCE http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jan/20/undercover-police-children-activists BRITISH POLICE TACTICS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION ... IS *ENDORSED* BY EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (2012) KETTLED BY BRITISH POLICE: Baroness Jenny Jones is a Green Party peer and London Assembly member  - Wikipedia. Kettling -- aka 'containment' -- aka 'corralling' -- fm German 'kessel' - 'cauldron' or 'kettle' -- term used to describe encircled army about to be annihilated -- thus a MILITARY TACTIC Kettling - Police Military Tactic -- in protest terms, aim is to prevent splintering of protesters -- to prevent forced splintering of police -- kettle formed by large cordons of police surrounding protesters -- once kettle formed (ie once protesters are surrounded) -- police cordon is tightened, incl. use of baton charges -- to restrict territory occupied by protesters -- police deny protesters access to food, water, and toilet facilities -- for arbitrary period determined by police -- protesters & bystanders therefore harassed & assaulted before being arbitrarily held captive -- protesters imprisoned by cordon for several hours, 'cooling' -- and left with one choice of exit: controlled by the police CRITICISMS Kettling - Police Military Tactic -- indiscriminate -- results in detention of law-abiding citizens & bystanders -- denied food, water & toilet facilities for excessively long periods, in some cases -- tactic used to foment disorder to change focus of public debate 2012 European Court of Human Rights -- following legal challenge -- ruled kettling lawful https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettling ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- Jenny Jones, Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb was kettled at demonstration against student fees in December 2010 Zain Sardar, from the Young Greens: "People have been kettled for up to nine hours without food and without medical assistance ..." "Kettling is an infringement of the fundamental right to peaceful protest." http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-12293394 ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- European court says 'kettling' tactics in 2001 lawful 15 March 2012 "Kettling" tactics used by the Metropolitan Police to contain crowds in 2001 were lawful, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled. The controversial method was used during anti-globalisation demonstrations in London on 1 May 2001. The court said there had been no violation of Article 5 - the right to liberty and security - of the European Convention on Human Rights. Three people - George Black, a Greek national from Australia; Bronwyn Lowenthal and Peter O'Shea - who had nothing to do with the demonstration, took the case to Europe claiming they were "deprived of their liberty". They were joined by Lois Austin, from Basildon, Essex, who had been taking part in the protest. 'Volatile conditions' The court said: "The police had imposed the cordon to isolate and contain a large crowd in dangerous and volatile conditions. "This had been the least intrusive and most effective means to protect the public from violence. Although the police tried to start dispersing the crowd throughout the afternoon, they had been unable to do so as the danger had persisted." It was the first time the court in Strasbourg had been asked to rule on kettling. [...] The European Court's Grand Chamber of 17 judges, presided over by Belgium's Francoise Tulkens, said: "Even by 2001, advances in communications technology had made it possible to mobilise protesters rapidly and covertly on a hitherto unknown scale. "Article 5 did not have to be construed in such a way as to make it impracticable for the police to fulfil their duties of maintaining order and protecting the public." The judges ruled that the convention also placed a duty on the police "to protect individuals from violence and physical injury". Earlier this year, in a separate case, the Met won its appeal against a High Court ruling over kettling tactics used during G20 demonstrations in 2009. [ ...] http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-17378700 ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT What the British political police have done to these women political campaigners, for the sake of British authorities infiltrating and spying on Britons exercising their lawful and democratic political rights, is depraved and worse than being killed (in my view). Doing a quickie check on Baroness Jenny Jones, I came across 'kettling' and it drew my attention. The term most likely arises from the military tactic of surrounding opposing forces. So now I know what kettling is and what those references 'cauldron' were, when I was following the self-defence action in Novorossiya without a clue what they were talking about.  Maybe I've read about kettling since and have forgotten, which is possible.  Apologies in advance if I'm repeat posting.  lol While I can understand the reluctance of courts to prevent police being able to do their work (which does, indeed, involve maintenance of order and protection of  the public),  indiscriminate and aggressive policing (such as kettling) which can (and has) been misused and is illegitimate as a police tactic (see 9-hour kettling reference above). In upholding the tactic of kettling protesters and bystanders (ie indiscriminately assault, imprisonment & protracted cruelty meted out by law enforcement authorities), the European Court of Human Rights has proven itself to be as illegitimate as the law enforcement authorities it has backed. The ECHR is another joke institution.  Don't expect much of this 17-judge farce. ------------ Protesters need to read military manuals (or even historic information about Roman battle formations etc), to figure how to circumvent the cauldron thingy.   Pre-planned protester splinters might be the go. Can't believe I've flipped sides.  Usually I side with the authorities whenever I see what looks like a violent rabble that needs hosing down or something. I'm bound to flip and do a 360 ... I'm not much of a rebel.  lol ꕤ

Video - Immgration - Sweden & Europe

EUROPE ABSORBING CONSEQUENCES OF AMERICA'S WARS AFGHANISTAN. IRAQ. LIBYA. SYRIA. 14 Years Afghanistan War Alone Swedish TV Report Left Wing Violence Pub May 2014 SOURCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ55KyNrO6A&feature=youtu.be Soviet Sweden? Model Nation Sliding to Third World  Pub Apr 2014 SOURCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4uDNSPlXE&feature=youtu.be Help Sweden Pub Jul 2012 SOURCE Ode To A Dying People "Falling down towards the abyss, the abyss The reaper embraces me with his kiss It makes me want to refuse to care, refuse to care To watch this all unfold too much to bear" Lyrics | Saga |  here   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTAH86qg4l8 Lengthy - 2:47:01 Documentary Immigration - Europe Pub 25 Sep 2015 SOURCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky3ZresFd2k Somebody, wake the driver ... Dispatch International English http://tiny.cc/7j6a6x Swedish http://www.d-intl.com/  ꕤ