TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

June 29, 2016

Freebie VPN



Freebie VPN
Internet Privacy
It looks beautiful in Japan
Mt Tsukuba
Tsukub Rinrin Road, (user-masao)


Bored.  Really tired, but bored.

Checking out VPN Gate.

VPN Gate is a University of Tsukuba, Japan, project involving public Virtual Private Network servers.

I'm not too clear on how any of this works and I really don't care.  

What interests me is the anonymity factor for 'everyday browsing' (ie where your ID's masked, even though you ultimately remain traceable).  I think.  I have no technical knowledge.  That's just my understanding.

Not sure if this is worth the bother.  Right now, I feel like I'm over information.  I think I'm over it.  Either that, or I'm just tired and depressed.

I've already hit a hurdle with the VPN Gate.  It doesn't look like Linux OS is supported.

Went to VPN Gate's forum.  Forum user has posted link to VPN services.  

The first service I looked at looks sh*t.   Paid service, I'd say, as it wants all your details.

NordVPN sounds better:
NordVPN is based in Panama, one of the small list of countries that has no data retention laws. This means the government cannot legally ask services on the Internet to hand over information on their users, allowing the VPN service to have a no-logging policy.
But it's a paid service and I think I let my bank account lapse a while back, so I think I'll keep looking.  

Malaysia is somewhere else where they don't have demands for VPN user data:

"... based in Malaysia, simply because the government does not have any laws that allow them to take information from VPN users." [source]
UK, US and Germany do not allow file sharing on P2P (peer to peer) servers ... whatever they are.  

P2P make a portion of PC resources available to others in peer-to-peer network of 'nodes', says Wikipedia.  Nodes are devices (PC or other) in a larger network of what looks like information hook-ups. 

It looks like you just use different servers to bypass the restrictions:

P2P/Torrent

P2P is available on most Hide.me servers, although the UK, Germany and US servers do not allow filesharing applications. Users will be able to move between servers to get onto P2P and there is servers in Canada for US users and plenty of servers in Europe, most of them offering P2P services. [source]

I really don't care about that, as I'm not planning on sharing anything. LOL ... I'm not good at sharing anything.

That's another paid service.

ibVPN offers 6 hour free sign-up.  I'm bored, but not that bored.

Windscribe have got a freebie service.  Wonder there's some catch like going through all the hassle of signing up, only to get hit with having to upgrade?


"... increased global surveillance of ordinary citizens makes it an indispensable product for today's Internet user"  [source]

They've got some scheme going, where you get paid in bitcoin if you get ppl to sign up.  I don't even have a bank account any longer, so I think I'd have a problem there.  LOL

There is a freebie component with a 10 gig limit, which would probably do me. 

Sounds OK so far:
"What are these tools?

There are 2 components: desktop VPN application, and browser extension. You can use them on their own, but for much greater protection, you should use both.

How much does Windscribe cost?

If you are a light user, you can use Windscribe for free. You get up to 10GB of data per month, and you can use all of the tools we offer.

What does the desktop application do?

The desktop application is a Virtual Private Network (VPN) client. It creates an encrypted tunnel from your computer to our servers, and all your activity is sent through the tunnel. This has 2 advantages:

1. Your Internet Service Provider (ISP) IP address is masked ...

2.  Your Internet Service Provider cannot see what you do online. This is much more important than you think.

browser extension provides a "Lite" VPN client, which does the same thing as the desktop one, but only in your browser. Any other applications you may be using on your computer will utilize your ISP provided IP address." [source]
They're making me nervous.  I don't like the sound of the 'much more important than you think' part.

It's a Canada-based company and you stand to gain 90% anonymity.  Which is better than none.  But Canada's just another Western totalitarian state.  Even so, it sounds good ... so far.

Other freebie VPN services are here.  I've not check them out.

Looking at real time Twitter feed, someone's asking for instructions on OpenVPN.  

OpenVPN is open source software:
"OpenVPN is available in repositories of most open source operating systems  .."
A bonus, as it should be more secure.  Not sure where this fits in.  

Algeria blocked social media on the 19th of June.

Reddit has VPN discussion topic.  LOL ... it looks like some VPNs might be run by the FBI.

Think I've had enough of this for now. 



This is lovely ....

January 01, 2016

Weev - 'Ian's death and antifa at CCC: why hackers must become nationalists'

Article
SOURCE
http://weev.livejournal.com/415737.html



        
Ian's death and antifa at CCC: why hackers must become nationalists. - Andrew Auernheimer
Oðinnsson. Market abuser. Internationally notorious computer criminal.

[Oðinnsson - Odin's son]

03:02 pm January 1st, 2016

People outside the technology industry don't quite understand the scope of Ian Murdock's contributions to the world. The internet is a big place. It has about a hundred million servers on it. Of those hundred million, about twelve percent are running Debian, Ian's distribution. After Slackware 8 came out in 2001, I switched to Debian and have been running it on my infrastructure since. Beyond servers, the most popular GNU/Linux system distributing for the desktop is called Ubuntu, and it uses Debian's core contributions.

By scope of deployment, Ian Murdock was one of the biggest contributors to the Internet in the world. Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds have shipped more widely deployed software, but Ian Murdock certainly exhibited a scale of contribution that approaches their level.

Over the past week Ian had his home invaded without cause. He was kidnapped at gunpoint and falsely charged with assaulting the officer who assaulted him. He subsequently committed suicide. Many people are commenting that he wasn't in a lucid state when he did so. I'm not so sure. His chances of seeing a California prison were very high. California state prisons are the worst in the nation. His chances of losing a significant bit of his assets to the state were also high. Ian had a lot of assets. Rather than endure torture in prison and a loss of his assets to those that were wronging him he killed himself. He was also hoping to catalyze retaliation in revenge against his tormentors, and his death will mean nothing if we don't make it so.

Before we go any further, let's examine the data.
[ GRAPHIC ]
This is a chart of various economic sectors and the total market cap of the associated companies. As you can see, of all the major sectors only financials exceed computing in value. I'm going to say pretty confident that none of them exceed computing in actual social contribution. This year, the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act passed. It was regarded as a terrible thing and opposed by the entire computing industry. It passed anyways. Computing is twice the market value of the energy industry. When is the last time a bill universally opposed by the energy industry has passed? Never. Such a thing is unthinkable. It does not happen. Utilities, the smallest sector on this list, a fifth of computing's value, has a gigantic multiple of its political power. Computing is regularly made the bitch of the media industry through legislation, which is too small to even appear in this chart.

The food/staples retailing industry is very small in comparison to computing, but I quite assure you that in my home of Northwest Arkansas, the cops have a record of every family with a Walmart executive in it and they know damn well better not to fuck with them. Even a low level Walmart executive isn't going to get beaten, humiliated, and falsely charged in the Ozarks. It simply won't happen because the cops know who runs that place. In contrast, one of the most important contributors to computing on the earth just had that happen to him in San Francisco of all places. The telecom services industry is relatively tiny by comparison to computing, but it still petitioned the government to violate my rights and the protests of the entire computing industry did not prevent it.

Ian is dead for the same reason Lance and Jonathan and Aaron are: computing, as an industry, has no will to power. Computing is filled with nerds who want to focus on their own shit and think politics is stupid. They are right, politics is stupid, and I had the same worldview up until the point a gun was pointed in my face, my home was reduced to rubble, and I was being beaten and starved in solitary confinement. Computing's lack of will to power is especially tragic not only because it has the highest potential for power, but because the big players of the game realize that it does. Regardless of the apolitical nature of the industry it is being dragged into Marxist struggles anyways.

Over at Status451, @maradydd has a brilliant analysis of the feminist part of the cultural Marxist ecosystem that has now turned its eye towards the technology industry, but her reduction of cultural Marxism to a simple protection racket is flawed, because feminists are not the only force agitating against the tech industry, and well funded companies are not the only target.

The other thing that happened over the past week is that antifa was out in force at Chaos Communications Congress. If you are unfamiliar with this, it is the most prestigious gathering of hackers in the world. It is not something done for profit, but for the exchange of ideas amongst hacker luminaries. Unlike feminism, antifa has no profit model in this space, and even if it did, the CCC is not a well capitalized company. It is a loose association of hackers.

Antifa at CCC took the chance to protest emerson's talk as racist. I might be a white nationalist and have been so in public since 2008, but if I were to give a talk at CCC I don't see how I could even make it racist. These are technical talks about real world software deployments. The talk itself was about emerson's travels to Sierra Leone at great personal risk to help use open source software to assist with the eradication of the Ebola virus. Why would they choose this talk?

Let me tell you something. I, as a public white nationalist, have never had problems with these people. Nowadays they are afraid to even say my name. I am Voldemort-tier:

    @MariachiMacabre @davidsgallant (he went on to make real buddy buddy friends with W 3 3 V)
    — MisAndri ಠ_ಠ (@AndriErlingsson) December 30, 2015
    @molon_labia @jack_o_bee4u @dlw624 @PowersThatBeat @Sid_Fishous are we talking about haxor w. E. E. V? Don't want him to find his name
    — GlitterBombTheWorld (@SparkleChaos) December 23, 2015
I'll tell you why they chose that talk: someone who goes to Africa to try to help 3rd world people not die is more likely than a white nationalist to cower their head in accusations of racism. They are looking for easy victims to create a narrative with. Their bonuses depend on it.

As it turns out, there is an economic interest in keeping the hacker community docile, afraid, and Balkanized. The last term is best because it is the same guy that catalyzed the genocides in the Balkans who funds most antifa groups: George Soros. Just as he funded the destruction of Yugoslavia because the unification of Slavs presented a threat to his geopolitical interests, he, along with the Rothschilds and the Weinsteins, now funds attempts to culturally subjugate the hacker community. You know that chart we look at above? They are desperately attempting to keep the political elements of computing subdued by Marxism because a rebalance of power according to value would be against their interests and for yours. Most of these antifa types are paid shills, but a few of you are honestly fooled. You are being cuckolded, advocating directly against the interests of your own community and for the interests of predatory billionaires.
When you push leftwards, you are screaming for more corpses of men like Ian, Lance, and Aaron.

There's a table that all those other people eat at, and they don't want to clear a seat for your tribe at it. I learned something in prison: if someone takes your seat at a table, you pick something up and bash them with it repeatedly. Ian's death was a result of an act of disrespect and violence, an extension of continual disrespect that has emanated from the power establishment for decades now. It's going to continue until we respond in kind.

Embrace the will to power. We can seize it. It won't take very many of us.

http://weev.livejournal.com/415737.html




San Francisco Police Brutality
Death of Ian Murdock
Link | Post

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

Wow, that was interesting reading.

Will need to do some look ups, as I'm not familiar with those mentioned in the article (although I know 'Aaron' would be Aaron Schwartz).

Might leave the look-ups for later, as I'm struggling (headache).
The prison canteen tray imagery was funny.  Not sure if he meant it to be, as he really did do prison.


December 09, 2015

Export Controls for Conventional Arms & Dual-Use Goods & Tech

info
SOURCE
as marked



CoCom
*not* treaty & therefore *not* legally binding
CoCom
Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls
-- est. by Western bloc powers
-- w/in 5 years of end WWII
-- to put an arms embargo on COMECON countries
-- 1994 ceased to function
-- control list of embargoed goods retained
-- until successor WASSENAAR ARRANGEMENT established
*Note: different from 'Wassenaar Agreement'

(US) Arms Export Control Act (AECA)
(US) International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)
{still in effect}

Violations
-- Japan (Toshiba Machine Company)
-- Norway (Kongsberg Group)
-- supply computer guided propeller milling machines to Soviets
-- enabled greater Soviet submarine detection evasion

US Congress sanctioned Toshiba / barred imports to US

CoCom

CoCom member states:

USA
Britain
Australia
Canada

Japan

Germany
France

Belgium
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Denmark
Norway

Italy
Spain
Portugal
Greece

Turkey

[where's NZ?  ... it's only 4-Eyes]




COMECON States
COMECON
(Council for Mutual Economic Assistance)
1949 to 1991
-- Soviet-led org, comprising Eastern Bloc
-- & other communist
-- term applied to multilateral (& extended to bilateral) activities
-- purpose / intent:
  • -- prevention of Soviet sphere of influence countries moving towards
  • -- influence of Americans or South-East Asia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comecon



COMECON States


[data from:  Wikipedia]


Successor to CoCom
*not* treaty & therefore *not* legally binding
Wassenaar Arrangement
(re Export Controls for Conventional Arms
& Dual-Use Goods & Tech)
-- multilateral export control regime (MECR)
-- 41 participating states
-- incl. many former COMECON (Warsaw Pact) countries

Aim prevent:
-- destabilizing accumulations
-- development or enhancement of military capabilities

-- successor to COCOM

-- 1996 - est. Wassenaar, Netherlands
-- less strict than COCOM
-- focus on transparency
-- no individual veto power over org. decisions
-- Vienna, Austria, admin. of agreement location
-- like COCOM, it is *not* treaty & therefore *not* legally binding
-- exchange of info re conventional arms deliveries, 6-mthly
  • battle tanks
  • armoured combat vehicles (ACVs)
  • large-calibre artillery
  • military aircraft
  • military helicopters
  • warships
  • missiles
  • missile systems
  • small arms
  • light weapons
Included on controls list:
  • electronics
  • computers
  • telecommunications
  • information security
  • {among others}
2013 Amendments

-- amended to incl:
  • internet-based surveillance systems
  • "intrusion software" (designed to defeat protective measures/ to extract data/info)
  • IP network surveillance systems

Aim of amendment re tech:

-- prevent sales to abusers of human rights

Problem:
-- restrictions weaken internet security of participant nations
-- controls too broad
-- tech security personnel limited in ability to:
  •     identify
  •     correct
-- security vulnerabilities
-- Google & Facebook critical
-- b/c probs. penetration testing, sharing threats info & bug bounty programs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wassenaar_Arrangement





---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

Don't know why anyone's complaining re the 'limits' of the Wassenaar Arrangement if it's not binding and can be ignored ... but I guess that's at govt/national level rather than internet provider and other tech level?
Don't get the bit about there being no individual veto re decisions of Wassenaar Arrangement.  So it's 'binding' ... but NOT binding.  That's stupid.
All of the above is available at the source ... so it's a bit of a pointless info arranging exercise.  Especially, when I probably won't remember or need to know this -- ever.  lol
---
** I'm guessing the US would probably enforce the 'unenforceable' through trade sanctions such as that imposed on Toyota?


October 11, 2015

Transcript - Julian Assange Interview - Hamish & Andy, Oct 2015

Assange
Transcript
Source

Hamish & Andy Audio - Oct 2015
http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/e/c/f/ecf7164bb3b333a5/Julian_Assange_Interview.mp3?c_id=9990803&expiration=1444478324&hwt=a6576deb465d02a68cbd40bd7149d0c3



JULIAN ASSANGE

ꕤ  Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

TRANSCRIPT
[for quotation purposes, confirm audio]
Updated


Assange Interview

Hamish & Andy Show Podcast

http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/e/c/f/ecf7164bb3b333a5/Julian_Assange_Interview.mp3?c_id=9990803&expiration=1444478324&hwt=a6576deb465d02a68cbd40bd7149d0c3



[skip intro]


Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Hello.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

G'day, this is Julian Assange here.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Hey, Julian, this is Hamish from the Hamish & Andy Show.

Mate, thank you so much for taking the time.

I'm just about to put you through to Andy.

You'll just be talking to Ando.

This is actually part of a segment where each of us tried to find a person that the other person would love to interview.

Julian Assange
WikiLeaks

Uh-ha.
Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

I'm brining you to Andy as the gift.
Julian Assange
WikiLeaks

I see. I see. I've gotcha.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

He got me Jeff Probst from Survivor.

Ummm, absolutely no offence to you. I think your story's fascinating. But I've already used my interview up.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

The other one has to do the leg work.

Hamish Blake
Hamish & Andy

Yeah. That's right. He got me Jeff.

I've had a great time.

Available for download [ skip ] ...

But I won't chew up any more of your time.

I'm going to pop you through to Andy.

And best of luck.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Julian.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

G'day Andy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Hey, thanks for taking the time.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

You're welcome.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Ummm, I'd imagine you've had a lot of in-depth political conversations with extremely informed interviewers.

Ummm, I'm just letting you know that this is probably not that interview.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Rarely. Rarely.

[Laughter]

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

OK. Good. Good.

[Laugher]

But I am certainly fascinated about your story, and also obviously the new book, The WikiLeaks Files, which is out now -- which we'll cover off.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

But I want to start, if I may, with the asylum thing and the fact that you are there in the Ecuadorian embassy.

What is the set up?

What is the set up, where do you live and what's the set up there?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, right now, I'm in the Ecuadorian Embassy of London, in a police siege -- the longest running police siege ever -- surrounded by a hundred (100) full-time equivalent police from the British government.

I've been detained (without charge in any country) in the United Kingdom, for five (5) years.

And there's a series of court cases proceeding. Criminal court cases, civil court cases, in different countries: in the UK, in the United states, in Sweden, in Saudi Arabia, in Germany, in Australia, Denmark [and] Iceland.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Mmmm-mmmm.

And they're the one--

--and so, I suppose that's the reason why you sought asylum.

You obviously don't want to face those charges at the moment.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I have not been charged.

It's an important thing to remember.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes, I'm sorry. They want you for questioning.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, there's quite a large number of cases.

The serious one is the US case, where there's a pending prosecution for espionage; in relation -- you were talking the Swedish case -- in relation to the Swedish case, I have already been cleared in that quote 'preliminary investigation' unquote.

The state of play now is it's still a 'preliminary investigation'.

They have refused to take my statement in five (5) years.

Nothing has happened in the case in five (5) years.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So, how long do you plan to wait, if those investigations around the world and those case -- like you mentioned, the one for espionage?

Did you you have a plan when you sought asylum?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

My plan was to--

It was a very dangerous and difficult environment outside the embassy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

And, so, yeah. There was a strategic plan, which is to--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[interjects]

Avoid them [laughter].

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--seek and receive asylum, both in a legal sense and in a practical sense -- and get into a country that was safer.

The first part of that has been successful.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.


Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, I've won the asylum case.

Ummm, and that then changes a little bit the legal and political character of everything else that happens, because it has been a formal founding that I have been politically persecuted by the United States.

But we still now have to achieve the practical component.

The UK's in violation of international law.

But so was the Iraq war, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, it's a bit hard to force a big state to obey the law.

That's a matter of politics.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So, on that point, how does one go about trying to seek asylum?

Was Ecuador your first choice?

Do you ring around a number of embassies?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

We looked at about twenty (20) different countries and we were negotiating with a variety of them.

Ecuador just got its boots on the ground first, as a kind of practical measure.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

And as you mentioned, I mean, British police have been out the front of that building for so many years. Ummm, they're waiting for you to come out in--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

[interjects]

Well, they've been around the building and in surrounding buildings, which are owned by Harrods, which they have struck a deal with.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

They've been inside the building. They hide behind the toilet on the exit stairwells. On the rooftops they have surveillance teams all over the place. It's a big operation.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

So where do you think--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- They admit that they've spent more than twelve (12) million pounds on it so far.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Wow.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

More than fifteen (15) million Australian dollars.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And, so, where is safe for you within that building, and what's your sleeping arrangements like?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Within the building?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, nowhere is safe.

They have managed to gain control from time to time of the floors above and below.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, wow. And, and--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

And they've been caught doing that.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, OK.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Ummm, they've even planted bugs in the ambassador's office.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Could they release [???] to us now?

6:57

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Almost certainly.

I mean, the United Kingdom -- it's come out in the Snowden revelations -- intercepts everything passing in and out of the UK automatically, regardless of whether it was me or not.

But, specifically, the GCHQ, the UK's electronic spy service was revealed to be spying on us. Yes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Wow.

I mean, you're probably used to that now, but that seems quite exciting -- err, for me [laughter].

Ummm, lets--

7:30

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I mean, it is exciting, generally speaking.

But it's, you know, it's a bit difficult on my family and a bit -- well, frankly, it's bloody unjust being detained without charge for five (5) years--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And intrusive, I'd imagine.

Well, talking of your family--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- it's just not right.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

--how do you get a chance to meet with family and friends?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

With extreme difficulty.

Because of the surveillance operation, people who come to the embassy run the risk of being exposed. Very likely to be exposed.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So, people who I don't want the UK government being able to -- and its allies to have some pressure on -- obviously can't come to the embassy.

8:12

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Of course. For their own safety.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

So how do you pass your days? Do you have the internet in there?

I imagine it would be tapped as well.

Is there a gym? Is there sunlight?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's-- it's very interesting that people have that question.

It actually reveals something about the way people think about what people do and that doing is somehow coupled to progressing through the physical environment. There's that assumption, but--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

8:40

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--you know, I'm a -- which I like to do.

But I do intellectual work, so I write books and I manage an organisation that's spread out all over the world, and its involves really serious stuff, and is fighting all these court cases and banking blockades and so on.

So, actually, there's more work to do when you're stuck in an embassy than when you're not stuck at an embassy.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[laughter]

I understand that.

But, I mean, a lot of people to do their work -- and need to be stimulated, you know, by some things -- the idea of exercise can stimulate the brain. These things, I mean, do they come readily to you every day, or are there ways that you can tune out?

9:20

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, I mean, it's like being on a submarine, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Maybe Australian navy people [???] submarines--

It's very--

Well, they don't go down for three years.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No, three (3) years would be a long dive [laughter].

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Three (3) years, no sun. They don't do that.

But on the other hand, they don't have such interesting visitors, either.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

I mean, WikiLeaks the website, a global phenomenon.

It's divided people, as you are well aware and I think all our listeners would be well aware.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Not really.

[Laughter]

Not really. It's divided some bullshit commentators.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

9:55

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It's certainly divided the Pentagon and it's divided some politicians that have been exposed, but we have global polling across twenty-four (24) countries, so it's not really divided.

We have overwhelming support across twenty-four (24) countries.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No doubt.

And amazing that you've obviously been able to win these awards, even though there's allegations against you of espionage, or at least an interest in that area from the US government.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

But, you know, it is a divisive topic. Explain to our audience--

10:22

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, even in the US -- we have forty percent (40%) support in the US.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Well, explain to our audience then why you think it must exist.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Why WikiLeaks must exist?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's existed nine (9) years now.

We actually have the most effective argument -- not the best argument, the most effective argument -- which is: it's now part of the status quo.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes, it is.

10:44

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

That the world has a place for WikiLeaks, simply by the fact that we've been around for nine (9) years.

But in terms of something more interesting than that: well, look the results.

We've published ten million (10,000,000) documents now, about every country in the world.

And it's about basic education.

That if you don't know what's happening in the world -- you can't escape reality, you can't stick your head in the sand -- sooner or later, reality will catch up with you, just like it did, say for example, in the Iraq war.

And while often it is because it happens to someone else, eventually, it will happen to you.

I mean, we're seeing that, for example, with this terrible mess that has been produced in Syria, which is starting to affect Australia now.

So it's not just something that can happen over there.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

No, I understand that and I think people would understand that freedom of information means that people will hide less and be better informed to make decisions.

Ummm, are there issues, do you think--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, it's the risk. It's also the risk.

Ummm, that if people in governments and major corporations can't be certain that they can keep their plans secret, that has a really powerful deterrent effect.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Even if they think the chance of their stuff -- you know, of us getting hold of their stuff is maybe only one in ten thousand, say -- that one in ten thousand chance really does have a deterrent effect.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, it will probably hold people to kind of a higher moral code.

But do you think there are issues that need hiding?

If I threw an example to you, and I'm sure you've had this question before, but if you came across a document that's outlining a way to stop a terrorist plot and by posting it that might alert terrorists, is that where something where WikiLeaks would show discretion there?

12:41

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

We have got a lot of experience.

We've done thousands of cases and ten million (10,000,000) documents, and we have a record of never having got it wrong in relation to a single document, in terms of its accuracy, and no-one being physically harmed as a result; that even the US government has been able to find, and it was forced to say that -- the Pentagon was forced to say under oath in court.

So there are decisions to be made in relation to --

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Well, this one wouldn't be people [skip] ...

Like, this would be potentially alerting people so we don't catch them, I suppose.

13:22

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah, it's something that's on people's minds.

But there's a reason it's on people's minds, which is because every time the press exposes the Pentagon or, you know, an equivalent agency, killing people, they try to distract on the issue; and they try to change the topic and start talking about what journalists have done.

But there's, you know, a long history in the press of --

I'm not aware of a single case where the press has published national security related information and this has led to retribution that has resulted in physical harm of anyone ever.

Now, of course, one can theorise that maybe there are some cases.

But, in practice, it doesn't happen.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Well, many people agree with you.

You've won so many awards for your work while being in the Ecuadorian embassy.

Who accepts those awards for you on your behalf -- at the actual events?

I mean, do you do a little 'piece de video' [??], or send in someone along with a note?

14:29

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Sometimes we send someone along, sometimes they bring things back here.

Sometimes it's, you know-- it's really the whole team that deserves the award. It's why I am most prominently getting the lightning, there's quite a big team of people who do the actual work.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Do you feel there are days where the cause that you're fighting--

You know, it's obviously taken over your life in every extreme because you are confined to the embassy.

I mean, there would be days you yearn for normality. What are the key things you miss, do you think?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, I often get that question.

I'm not going to give the bastards the pleasure of saying what I miss.

They want very much to turn me into some kind of deterrent.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I'm someone who has not even been charged, so I'm not going to get into the business of deterring people from following in my footsteps.

I want to encourage people to follow in my footsteps.

But, ummm--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

I appreciate that.

15:35

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

-- so [inaudible].

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yep. Let me play on then.

Like you mentioned, there are so many cables and documents on WikiLeaks, it makes sense to me to put them in a book.

I'll tell you why.

It's because I don't know where to start sometimes.

If I went to WikiLeaks the website, there's just so much information.

So if it's a little bit easier to consume, potentially more people are going to do that.

Is that where you see the benefit of The WikiLeaks Files?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, we ended up with so much information.

Now we've done what Google has done.

We have a sophisticated search engine which is on the front page.

So you can put in some guy that your sister is about to go out with, or something, in the name.

We see quite a lot of that.

Yeah, so there's that way of doing things and that's fast.

But in terms of something more nuanced, yeah, that's why we wrote this book.

Because we wanted to see something much more in depth, in terms of looking at the structural relationships between countries.

Not just a little nugget here and there, but, you know, what's happening in Syria, for example, as far as our material is concerned -- does it give an insight into what is happening?

And it does.

I mean, it shows very clearly that we have, if you like, part of the plan the US started erecting from at least 2006 to overthrow the Syrian government. Well before the problems in the Arab Spring.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Is the book available in the US?

17:15
Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It's available in the US, it's available in the UK, yeah.

The US is an interesting country.

In some ways it's better than the United Kingdom.

OK, it's a militarised country, which is problematic; a very large and powerful country.

On the other hand, if you look at concentrations of power, there is New York, Washington, California, broadly speaking, and the South. Texas.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yes.

17:49

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Now, to make that more concrete, seventeen percent (17%) of corporate registrations are in New York, whereas if you look -- and that's the max -- the city with the most.

Whereas, if you look at the United Kingdom, more than eighty percent (80%) of corporate registrations are in London, [inaudible ???] are in London.

Just imagine how bad the US would be, if for the past four hundred (400) years, Washington was in the same place as New York, as LA, as Houston.

UK's a very tightly integrated society, with a conformist, controlling social structure.

So we see, in the US, a lot more support for me and WikiLeaks than we do here in the UK, because there's more freedom to be your own thing in the US -- somewhere in the US.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

OK.

And in their Constitution. And they feel that and fight for those rights vehemently.

18:54

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, they're rapidly eroding. But, yeah, part of the social make-up has the idea that there should be such a thing as free speech.

Obviously, it's being very quickly eroded, but yeah we have--

In practice that is translated to on the ground support -- significant support for us -- within the United States.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

You used to be (or, I read) -- and whether you like the term, I'm not sure -- a hacker.

And I read that you were hacking for good, not evil; and that's why authorities were lenient back in the day.

What type of -- again, the term 'hacking' --

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

No good deed goes unpunished, right?

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

Yes.

What type of hacking did you get up to and what made it good?

I couldn't really quite understand that bit.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, there's--

I don't like this term. I mean, it's used as a propaganda term.

Steve Jobs was also a hacker.

Bill Gates was also a hacker.

At the same age -- which is, you know, when I was a teenager.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Is there another term you'd like to replace it with?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

No, I don't.

I think it's a perfectly nice term.

It's been bastardised because now you've got these, you know, Eastern European mafia hacking your grandmother--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughing]

Yeah.

20:12

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

So people don't like it.

But in terms of exploring the early internet, before, you know, normal people were allowed on the internet, while it was still a military and research object, yeah, I was there, you know, reading Pentagon generals' e-mails each night when I was seventeen.

And it starts to give you a--

You know, Australia's a pretty isolated place, so it starts to -- it allows you to, sort of, see a little bit about how the world is actually structured from the inside.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Can you remember that feeling, when you first got in and you realised that you could go in and read the Pentagon's e-mails?

Can you remember that feeling?

20:56

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Yeah, it's a sort of buzz that you get that is like, you know, like any kind of -- like parachuting or something like that.

The same adrenalin producing activity--

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

--exhilarating.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

--but -- but, also has an intellectual and political side.

So it's also a buzz associated with learning, not just the risk of the experience but, you know, that you're learning about the world in some important way.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

For someone so--

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

It is a-- it is quite an amazing thing to be involved in, especially then.

Now everyone can go onto the internet.

You know, you can get half that. Half that.

But, you know, reaching out into the world and understanding information.

You know, we can all log onto the internet and do a lot of that now, but back then the internet in Australia was only available to computer hackers and a couple of research institutes.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

[Laughter]

Which is incredible.

For someone so well informed about the cyber world, do you think our society is too exposed online and, you know, the lay person here and people that aren't super into it -- and our audience may or may not be -- but, from my perspective, I never really know how exposed we are.

What do you see the threats there for just everyday people?

22:12

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Look, it's really serious in the long-term.

For everyday people, there's a practical reality.

The big American internet companies -- Google, Facebook etc -- are constantly recording and intercepting what you're doing.

Because if you think you're just using Google when you go to Google search pages, it's not true.

It has trackers embedded in most websites, because it has deals with most websites to supply the ads of those websites, or tracking software that the websites use to collect statistics and so on, and it powers most smartphones.

So the activity on your smartphone goes to Google. It collects all that.

And then the National Security Agency ('NSA') and the FBI in the United States then stick their fangs into Google's data repositories and Facebook's as well, and they also have their own massive surveillance operation, and the Australian government through the ASD -- the Australian Signals Directorate -- also intercepts a lot of information as it goes in and out of the country -- in bulk -- and then exchanges this through what is known as the Five Eyes alliance, which is the alliance of intelligence agencies led by the United States, the NSA, in the Anglo-Christian countries.

It's probably, you know, unfamiliar with your listeners, but one of the great structuring principles of the world is what the relationships are between the deep states of various countries.

So between the intelligence agencies of the countries.

24:03

And there's a really intimate integration between Australia, the United States, the UK, New Zealand, and Canada, that has been around for -- well, essentially, since post World War II -- that has developed an ever stronger bond as time has gone by.

So, in some sense, we should look at those five countries on a geopolitical level as the one country.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Yeah, I understand that.

So everyday use of our smart phones is essentially writing files on us and giving it straight to them.


Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Well, yeah, either because the traffic from your phone is going through these mass interception points that these various countries have set up, where data ingresses or egresses a country, goes across some fibre optic cable under the ocean, or because -- and the second factor, is starting to become more of a problem than the first one -- or because, Google is running your smartphone or you're using Facebook services.

And those large data repositories are accessible, not only by those companies and their affiliates, but by those jurisdictions.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Ah, Julian, I know I've gone over time but I just want to warp it up.

A couple of things.

Has your Spanish improved being there at the embassy?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

A bit. But, you know, I'm someone who, unfortunately, is constantly working in English. So it does distract your language ability when you're focused in one so heavily.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

And, I know that you were at North Queensland, when you were in Australia -- when you grew up -- ummm, are you aware that the North Queensland Cowboys won the NRL final?

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

I am not.

I am not, but I'm pleased.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

They did on the Weekend. On Sunday.

So I thought -- I was hoping I'd be the first person to tell you.

I know you're not number one ticket holder, but congratulations to you and your people up there.

[Laughter]

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

Thanks.

Andy Lee
Hamish & Andy

Julian, thank you, mate.

The WikiLeaks Files, out now everybody. Published by Verso and available at Booktopia and also in good bookshops.

Have a great day, and you're a very fascinating man.

I can very much appreciate how you've stuck to your guns.

It's inspiring.

Well done.

Julian Assange
Publisher WikiLeaks

OK.
Thanks, Andy.
Bye, Bye. Take care.


--- end: 26:25 ---

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Other

UKUSA Agreement

multi-lateral secret treaty
between intelligence agencies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement




LATEST BOOK
Assange, Co-Author

The WikiLeaks Files
(2015) | here

POLITICAL PERSECUTION
 JULIAN ASSANGE
Australian Journalist

FAQ & Support


 JULIAN ASSANGE
Transnational Security Elite
Carving Up the World Using
Your Tax Money