Google's threesome ...
Wankers. |
TOKYO MASTER BANNER
MINISTRY OF TOKYO
|
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
March 19, 2016
Google's threesome ...
October 26, 2015
Transcript - Audio - JULIAN ASSANGE Interview By Kostas Ephemera, The Press Project
ꕤTranscript SOURCE
TRANSCRIPT Hi, I'm Kostas Ephemera from the Press Project, and I'm speaking to you from the Embassy of Ecuador. I'm here with Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, and he's agreed to give us some answers for the Greek audience. *** [???] the dictum "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" works, after all, for the system. It is about this professional class of people who are involved in trying to holding government to account. In Greece, we have suffered and continue to suffer the results of austerity. It's about the particular factions that pushed for it -- whether they have a benefit -- and, of course, the CIA perceives they have a benefit. They create a problem and then they're given a greater budget to clean 'the problem' up. More
ꕤ
|
Labels:
America,
Corruption,
Democracy,
Facebook,
Free Trade Agreements,
Google,
Israel,
Julian Assange,
Kostas Ephemera,
Mass Surveillance,
Media,
Neoliberal,
Syria,
Syriza,
The Press Project,
Transcript,
USA,
WikiLeaks
July 31, 2015
Google Compute Engine - Cloud Computing & Customer Held Encryption Keys / Red Herrings
Google has just done something that’s going to annoy the US and UK governments Business Insider Alastair Stevenson, Business Insider Jul. 29, 2015, 11:15 AM 2
UK Prime Minister David Cameron is not going to like this.
Google has rolled out a security service for its business customers that could put a serious downer on the UK government’s plans to increase law enforcement’s surveillance powers.
The service was revealed by Google product manager Leonard Law in a blog post and is currently in beta form.
It will let businesses running the company's Google Compute Engine create their own encryption keys.
Encryption is a security technology that scrambles digital information using specialist mathematics.
It makes it so only people in possession of a specific unlock key or password can read the encrypted information.
Google’s move may not sound like a big deal to people outside the technology community, but the implications for the move are pretty massive.
What the Google Compute Engine is
Google’s Compute Engine is the basis of the company's cloud computing platform.
Cloud computing is a special type of technology that uses a network of remote servers hosted on the internet to run computer processes traditionally done on a device’s internal hardware.
In theory, this means cloud computing customers can get high-powered computer performance, or run complex tasks beyond normal hardware’s capabilities without having to buy lots of equipment.
As well as Google, which uses the tech to power many of its own services, such as YouTube, numerous big-name companies including Coca Cola, Best Buy, Rovio, Avaya and Ocado also use the Compute Engine.
How it links to government surveillance
The widespread use of Google’s cloud tech means it handles vast amounts of user data. Data running through the platform can include things like customer records, account information and, at times, the user's geographic location.
PRISM documents leaked by Edward Snowden in 2013 revealed intelligence agencies, such as the NSA and GCHQ, have been siphoning vast amounts of web user information from Google's cloud platform – as well as many other cloud service providers.
The move makes sense, as the Compute Engine’s large customer base lets the agencies collect data from multiple companies and services from one central source.
A game of cat and mouse
Google already encrypts services running through its Compute Engine by default. This partially protects customers as it means agencies like the NSA or GCHQ cannot read the data without knowing which encryption key was used.
However, the tactic is not foolproof, as the NSA and GCHQ can use legal requests, such as letters sent under the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), to force Google to unlock or hand over unencrypted copies of the data.
This issue was set to get even worse in the UK and US as both governments have hinted at plans to make it easier for law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
Law enforcement agencies within the US have been lobbying for the US government to control business use of encryption since the PRISM leaks emerged. FBI director of counter-terrorism Michael Steinbach warned lawmakers that strong encryption technology allows terrorists "a free zone by which to recruit, radicalize, plot and plan," in June.
UK prime minister David Cameron has hinted at plans to hamper the use of encryption. Cameron told Parliament he wants to "ensure that terrorists do not have a safe space in which to communicate," on June 6.
How companies having their own keys will hamper surveillance
Experts within the security community have argued that Google’s move will cause problems for the UK government’s plans.
FireEye global technical lead Simon Mullis explained to Business Insider this is because it will make it so Google won’t be able to decrypt the data, even if ordered to.
“Essentially the access to, ownership and management of the keys used to encrypt all data within Google Cloud is now handled by the end-customer," he said.
"[This will] make it harder for any external agencies such as law enforcement or intelligence services to gain access to the decrypted data as there are fewer parties [people able to unlock the data] involved.”
As a result, if law enforcement wanted access to the encrypted Compute Engine data, they would have to mount individual requests to each customer, a practice that would slow their surveillance operations.
Business Insider has reached out to the UK Prime Minister's press team for comment on how custom encryption keys will impact Cameron's plans.
Google is one of many technology companies working to fight the UK and US government’s surveillance plans. A group of 140 companies, including Google, Microsoft, Apple and Facebook, sent an open letter to President Obama in May urging him to reject the encryption proposals, fearing they would damage the US economy. Apple CEO Tim Cook claimed law enforcement’s hostility towards encryption is dangerous in June.
SOURCE http://www.techinsider.io/google-has-offered-compute-engine-customers-advanced-encryption-powers-2015-7 --------------------- COMMENT
'Terrorists' is the big stick / leverage go-to for governments to demand access.
If I were a company, I would prefer complete control of my own data. Relying on cloud computing doesn't appeal, even though it may be cheaper. And why would you trust any company that can unencrypt your data? But I guess the advantage might be in passing the buck. As in, if data is compromised, you can maybe blame it on the third party cloud host & they get lumped with compensation payouts?
This is a good companion article regarding encryption offerings:
The Red Herring of Digital Backdoors and Key Escrow EncryptionBill Blunden EXTRACTS By concentrating on key escrow the CEOs of Silicon Valley are able to conjure up the perception of an adversarial relationship with federal agencies. This is absolutely crucial because tech companies need to face the public wearing a white hat. In the aftermath of the PRISM scandal, where C-suite types were caught colluding with the government on a first-name basis, American executives are frantically trying to convince people on behalf of quarterly revenue that they’re siding with consumers against spying. An interesting but fundamentally flawed narrative, given how much economic espionage the government conducts and how much spying corporate America does. Who do you think benefits from this sort of mass surveillance? I really like this guy's articles. |
April 09, 2015
SNOWDEN, ASSANGE & WIKILEAKS: USA - NSA Police-State Dictatorship & Corporate Media State-Aligned Propaganda
John Oliver’s interview with Edward Snowden: Pseudo-satire in defense of NSA surveillance By Thomas Gaist COMMENT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
OTHER Vilifying WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, and Chelsea Manning by Hearsay |
Labels:
America,
Dictatorship,
Edward Snowden,
Facebook,
Google,
International Law,
John Oliver,
Julian Assange,
Last Week Tonight,
Mass Surveillance,
NSA,
Police State,
PRISM,
Propaganda1,
Sean Penn,
USA,
WikiLeaks,
Yahoo
April 06, 2015
Google v. War Photography & Alternative Media
|
February 03, 2015
USG - Google Investigation of WikiLeaks Staff - Broad Attack on Free Speech & Free Press
Google, gag orders and WikiLeaks: who’s lying? Jeff John Roberts COMMENT An example of the US government misusing the law to target and punish foreign journalists exercising free speech and freedom of press. PS The impact of US secret investigations campaign against these journalists would have an implication for all journalists, including Americans. |
September 27, 2014
SURVEILLANCE, CYBER-SECURITY & OTHER
SURVEILLANCE, CYBER-SECURITY & OTHER
NSA New Chief Risk Officer Position
VIDEO
Black Market
FBI - Fake Cellphone Towers Surveillance
COMMENT Buch of random information in the IT, cyber-security, surveillance, hacking and similar category, that I found interesting at the time. |
September 25, 2014
Surveillance & IT
SURVEILLANCE & IT
>Apple has begun 2 store user data on servers @ mainland
However, a recent report in the Star reveals that police are still making requests for subscriber data without a warrant, though the number of requests has dropped significantly.Rogers’ transparency report revealed the government made nearly 175,000 requests for subscriber data to the company last year, or about 480 per day. Telus’ transparency report, released last week, found the company got 103,500 requests last year, or about 283 per day. Government documents released under access to information laws earlier this year estimated that the government makes about 1.2 million such requests every year.
COMMENT
Not clear on the status of Canada's C-13 bill. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)