TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

December 29, 2015

Saudi Arabia Backed By West - Killing Civilians Wholesale in Yemen


Yemen
attacked & bombed by Saudi Arabia
supported by West
& Gulf  States










Yemen

93% of deaths & injuries in Yemen are civilian

Over 2,200 civilian deaths had been registered by September 2015

overwhelming from:
  • air-launched explosive weapons – 93%;
  • ground-launched explosive weapons – 94%;
  • improvised explosive devices – 97%.

Report | PDF
https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/Yemen%20EWIPA%20report.pdf

SOURCE
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/oct/27/yemen-deaths-93-civilian-this-must-change



Hakim Almasmari
@HakimAlmasmari


Yemen Expert. Reporting/analysis on CNN, WSJ, AJE, BBC, RT, etc. Editor in Chief of Yemen Post Newspaper @YemenPostNews, University Lecturer, Yemeni American.


reports:
  • 150,000 Saudi airstrikes
  • Over 40,000 civilians killed in 272 day war



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------



COMMENT

I've not check the PDF report attached to The Guardian story.

Not sure what the go is with that figure.

Academic & Yemen Post editor gives a figure of 40,000 civilians killed (which is vastly more than that 2,200 figure).

No time to check now.

The man that's holding up 'something' is holding up a human hand.





UAE Mercenaries Fighting in Yemen - Western Advisers

Article
SOURCE

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mercenaries-charge-uae-forces-fighting-yemen-764309832



Middle East Eye
British news website
'independently funded'
David Hearst, editor
(formerly at The Guardian)
wholly owned by MEE Ltd
sole director: Jamal Bassasso
fmr director at Qatari-funded al-Jazeera

MIDDLE EAST EYE

Revealed: The mercenaries commanding UAE forces in Yemen
The UAE has brought in experienced foreign military officers to command an elite force reporting to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed

Rori Donaghy
Wednesday 23 December 2015 09:30 UTC

Last update:
Saturday 26 December 2015 12:25 UTC


An Australian citizen is the commander of an elite UAE military force deployed in Yemen as part of the Saudi-led coalition, which human rights groups accuse of war crimes.

Mike Hindmarsh, 59, is a former senior Australian army officer who is publicly listed as commander of the UAE’s Presidential Guard.

The Presidential Guard is a unit of marines, reconnaissance, aviation, special forces and mechanised brigades, according to the US State Department website.

Hindmarsh oversaw the guard’s formation in early 2010 shortly after he took up his estimated $500,000-a-year, tax-free job in Abu Dhabi, where he reports directly to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan.

The Presidential Guard has been lauded for playing a key role in the Saudi-led coalition seeking to reinstall the exiled Yemeni government of President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi.

The coalition was formed in March to push back the rebel Houthi movement, which Arab Gulf states view as being backed by regional rival Iran.

Presidential Guard troops have been in Yemen since 4 May, and were reported to have played a key role in the recapturing of port city Aden by local Hadi-allied forces on 17 July.

Human rights groups
including Amnesty International have called for a suspension of arms exports to members of the Saudi-led coalition after reporting what they described as “damning evidence” of war crimes in Yemen. There is no evidence to suggest that Hindmarsh is responsible for the alleged war crimes claimed by rights groups.

At least 5,700 people – about half of them civilians – have been killed since the coalition launched its campaign. Yemen was already suffering a serious humanitarian crisis before the coalition's entry into the war; however, the country’s situation has since grown increasingly grave, with more than 80 percent of the population of 24.5 million needing humanitarian assistance.


The Australian connection

While the Arab coalition fighting in Yemen is widely described as being led by Saudi Arabia, one Gulf official told Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity that the external ground forces were in reality being steered by the UAE.

More than 10,000 coalition troops have been sent to Yemen and, while no official numbers have been released, it is believed that at least 1,500 Emirati troops are taking part in ground operations.

The best trained and equipped coalition troops are likely to be those from the UAE Presidential Guard, which was the only Arab force to undertake full military operations in Afghanistan, where they fought alongside American soldiers.

A defence website has estimated that there are around 5,000 soldiers in the Presidential Guard.

It was announced in 2014 that the UAE was to pay the US Marines $150mn to train the guards. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed was reported to have ordered the force to be instilled with a “warrior ethos”.

Overseeing the development of this elite force has been Hindmarsh, who had a distinguished career in the Australian army before moving to Abu Dhabi.

Hindmarsh served in his home country’s military between 1976 and 2009, during which time he received 11 awards and took part in tours that included deployments to the Middle East.

Mike Hindmarsh (UAE Armed Forces)

After first heading up the Australian SAS between January 1997 and January 1999, he moved on to command Australian Special Forces between October 2004 and January 2008, before leading Australian forces in the Middle East from March 2008 until January 2009.

Hindmarsh was based in Baghdad and oversaw the moving of Australia’s regional base to the UAE after their withdrawal from Iraq. Local media reported that during this time Hindmarsh had “dealings at the highest security levels with senior officials and the UAE military”.

Since then Australian troops have been based at the Minhad Air base, and earlier this year then Prime Minister Tony Abbott announced that 600 Australian troops would be sent to the UAE as part of the wider fight against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq.

After moving back to Australia from the Middle East, Hindmarsh took up a new role in March 2009 heading up the Army Training Command at Victoria Barracks in Sydney for a salary of $230,000 a year.

However, in October 2009 it was announced that the Australian government had approved Hindmarsh retirement from the army to take up a new role commanding the UAE Presidential Guard.

Military expert Michael Knights said Hindmarsh's role in the guard, reported on Twitter, was a “smart” move by the UAE.

“All GCC (Gulf) states should be doing this. Don’t just buy the best equipment, buy talent too,” he wrote, referring to the Gulf state's huge investment in military hardware.

It would appear that the UAE has followed the principle of bringing in experience to develop the Presidential Guard, as a quick search through LinkedIn throws up numerous results of experienced soldiers - mainly from Australia - who occupy senior roles in the elite force.

Among those working in Abu Dhabi is Peter Butson, a former Australian soldier and intelligence corps officer who since February 2014 has been an adviser to the Presidential Guard.

Scott Corrigan, a former special operations commander in the Australian army, has been a specialist adviser to the Presidential Guard since January 2013. Kevin Dolan is an evaluator for the guard and was previously a warrant officer in both the Australian and British armies. Steve Nichols is another former senior commander in the Australian army who is now in his fifth year as a senior adviser to the guards.

It is not known how many Australians work for the UAE army; however, local media reported at the time of Hindmarsh's appointment that there were "dozens" working in "leadership, training and mentoring roles".

While Australians appear to dominate the foreign contingent of commanders in the Presidential Guard, there are other nationalities who are advising and training the force.

Dizzy Dawson, a former manager at the UK’s Ministry of Defence and an ex-Royal Marine officer, is a senior security adviser to the guard; and American Robert B Cross Sr headed up the UAE Presidential Guard Institute as part of the US Marine Corps training programme.

Responding to critical comments about the UAE employing mercenaries, military expert Knights tweeted: “It is the same business whether for your original state or a new one. A good general can end a war faster, save lives.”

Knights added that employing foreign mercenaries “was a fairly traditional part of conflict before the age of nationalism”.

Mike Hindmarsh speaks to a room of Emiratis (UAE Armed Forces)

Mercenaries killed in Yemen

Some mercenaries have been killed in Yemen. The Houthi-run Saba News reported on 8 December that six Colombians and their Australian commander were killed in fighting around the flashpoint southeast province of Taiz.

Saba News updated their report on 9 December to say 14 foreign mercenaries had been killed – including two Britons and one French citizen on top of the Australian and Colombians – although this claim is unconfirmed.

Colombian mercenaries were first reported to have been fighting in Yemen in October, when about 100 former Colombian soldiers were said to have joined coalition troops, with about 800 in total planned to be sent in to back up pro-Hadi forces.

The Colombians are believed to have been recruited to fight in Yemen by the UAE. The New York Times reported in 2011 that experienced Colombian troops had been offered high salaries to join a secretive UAE force established in response to the Arab Spring uprisings.

It is not known if the Colombians fighting in Yemen are linked to the Presidential Guard; however, both the secretive force established in 2011 and the guard report directly to Mohammed bin Zayed.

Many reports have referred to the Colombians as being employees of Blackwater – a controversial American military company whose guards killed 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007. However, as former Guardian Middle East editor Brian Whitaker has written, the contractor who set up the UAE force is a company called Reflex Responses.

Reflex Responses, which is also known as R2, has denied that Erik Prince, the former Blackwater chief, is behind their company.


Presidential Guard recruitment

While the Colombian and Australian mercenaries remain largely behind the scenes, the UAE Presidential Guard is far from secretive, at least in its recruitment strategies.

The guard has been promoted as a symbol of national strength, rooted in pride at how strong the UAE has become since its establishment in 1971.

The UAE has engaged in military action across the region, including in the Saudi-led coalition and the US-led coalition fighting against the Islamic State (IS) group in Iraq and Syria.

Abu Dhabi has independently launched air strikes in Libya – to the surprise of American officials – and been described as a “potent ally” for the US.

This developing sense of military strength is on full display in a 2011 promotional video for the Presidential Guard. Men in military fatigues singing nationalistic songs are interspersed with images of the country’s rulers and shots of the UAE’s military hardware.

A recruitment presentation posted online in October 2013 said the guard is at the “heart of the nation”. The presentation said recruitment should be targeted at men and women between the ages of 16 and 29 who are at a “crossroads” in their lives.

The guard has a Facebook page and Twitter account. Recruitment has been publicly advertised, projecting Emirati members as proud citizens protecting their country.

The Presidential Guard has not only sought to expand its numbers but its members experience has also been used to train young men completing their national service.

Mandatory national service was introduced by the UAE in June 2014. All men aged between 18 and 30 who completed secondary education must serve nine months, while those who did not must serve for two years. National service is voluntary for women, and those who sign up are trained for nine months.

A way of completing national service is to train with the Presidential Guard, according to the LinkedIn profile of one Emirati.

Some national service conscripts have been sent to fight in Yemen. However, this was stopped in September after 45 Emirati troops were killed in a Houthi attack.

Emirati families told MEE in August that they were shocked their sons had been sent to Yemen, as they had no conflict experience.

At the time, military expert Knights said the rationale behind sending national service conscripts to Yemen was likely to bring untrained troops experience as part of a nation-building exercise.

There is no official death toll of the number of UAE troops killed in Yemen.

'Ally with the Muslim Brotherhood'

There is no sign of the war in Yemen coming to an end. Peace talks between opposing sides ended in Switzerland at the weekend with little progress, while fighting continues on the ground.

According to one Gulf official, the UAE should build more pragmatic alliances on the ground in Yemen if they want the war to end soon.

The official, who spoke to MEE on condition of anonymity, said that the war could be over “in two to three weeks” if the Emiratis agreed to ally with Islah, the Muslim Brotherhood affiliate in Yemen
.

“But they won’t because they have this problem with the Muslim Brotherhood,” the official said.

The UAE has led a region-wide assault on the Muslim Brotherhood, including labelling the group as terrorists domestically and supporting the Egyptian army in overthrowing Egypt's first elected president Mohamed Morsi, who is a Brotherhood leader.

Abu Dhabi has refused to work with Islah, and Emirati officials have blamed the Brotherhood for the failure to drive Houthi rebels out of areas including Taiz province.

Emirati disdain for the Brotherhood has gone so far that Abu Dhabi is said to have aided and abetted the Houthis' takeover of Yemeni capital Sanaa in September last year, in order to undermine the role played by Islah in the country's governance, senior sources told Middle East Eye at the time. Now, 15 months later, the Emiratis are mired in a battle to push back the Houthis, but are wary of empowering their Brotherhood foe.

The Gulf official said: “It is time for the UAE to prioritise the lives of Yemenis and ally with Islah. Their men are being killed by the Houthis and there is a clear way to end this.”

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mercenaries-charge-uae-forces-fighting-yemen-764309832



SMH

Australia's basing its $87m secret on sensitive absurdity

Date     November 8, 2009

DON'T tell anyone, but the Federal Government is spending $87.5 million of your money on a new Middle East military base.
Not that it uses the word ''base''. Instead, budget papers say that the money is being spent on ''command and control enhancements'' which will ''consolidate ADF supporting assets to one location''.

Nor will it say where the base is because under a deal with the host country, Australia agrees not to reveal it. Nor does it give the location of the old bases the new one is replacing.

An ADF spokesman told The Sunday Age that Defence did not say where the bases are because of security considerations and ''host national sensitivities''.

The coyness has less to do with security and more to do with the ''sensitivities'' of the the Arab hosts, who don't want to advertise that they accommodate foreign troops and their hardware, including big, noisy aircraft with red kangaroos stencilled on the fuselage.

The secrecy leads to a curious absurdity: details and images of most of the bases are on the internet, in the Middle East press and even on ADF websites. Australian ambassadors have openly said where they are. They are mentioned in Hansard.

The Sunday Age is also a party to the subterfuge. On an ADF-escorted trip to the Middle East and Afghanistan, we undertook not to reveal ''operationally sensitive information'' - including ''the country in which ADF support bases are located outside of Iraq and Afghanistan''.

Without breaching that undertaking, we can reveal - drawing on what spies call ''open sources'' and Sunday Age readers call Google - where these bases are.

One of them has a big sign out the front, adorned with red kangaroos and the words ''Billabong Flats''. Drawing on the public record, we can reveal that bases have been or are being closed in Kuwait and Qatar.

The new one is at Al Minhad Air Base in Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates.

Australia's Middle East bases have mushroomed since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Now their focus is supporting the war in Afghanistan. Australian troops going to Afghanistan acclimatise in Kuwait, at a compound attached to a US base notorious for its fast food outlets on a stretch of sand and gravel known as Fat Alley.
The base is alongside Kuwait's Ali Al Salem Air Base. You can find more than you need to know about the base at globalsecurity.org, including its precise location: 29°20'48"N 47°31'15"E.

Liberal senator David Bushby visited the base on an ADF-escorted trip and told the Senate all about it on June 18. ''The ADF conducts a training course for all personnel arriving in the Middle East theatre at Billabong Flats, a base Australia maintains in Kuwait,'' he said.

The community information page on the website of the army's 3rd Brigade also mentions the Kuwait base and its fast food outlets, including one that boasts ''the world's best cheesesteak''.

About 110 soldiers at Billabong Flats form what is called the force support unit. Their presence in the emirate has been reported in newsletters issued by the Australian embassy in Kuwait.

Billabong Flats is due to close at the end of the year, in a phased consolidation of Australian bases. While its Kuwait location was handy for invading Iraq, it's not convenient for Afghanistan.

Moving it will slash flying time, saving fuel bills and offsetting the cost of the new base.

When the force support unit moves to Dubai, it will join Defence's regional headquarters and the RAAF.
The Government has not announced this but Australia's ambassador to the UAE has, in an interview with Abu Dhabi's The National newspaper last month.

The paper revealed that 250 ADF personnel have been stationed at Dubai's Al Minhad Air Base since December.

Air force Hercules and crews completed their move from Qatar to Dubai last Thursday, joining an Orion detachment that has been there since 2003.
By the end of the year, 500 Australians will be permanently based there, the numbers boosted by hundreds more as troops transit to and from Afghanistan.

The fact that the locations are widely known does not prevent media groups on ADF trips from spicing their stories with references to ''secret'' installations they can't identify ''for security reasons''.

Townsville radio host Steve ''Pricey'' Price revealed in a report last month, presumably filed from Billabong Flats, that: ''I'm with another wonderful bunch of Aussies in a secret spot that James Bond, Frodo Baggins or even Lawrence of Arabia could never find.''

There's a serious side to all this, said academic Richard Tanter, director of the Nautilus Institute at RMIT, which maintains an online database on Australian forces abroad.
''Governments ought to be as transparent as possible, and secrecy should only be justified in serious cases of potential danger to persons,'' Professor Tanter said.
''The double standard imposed by the UAE Government corrodes trust in co-operation between allies.

''They are fooling no one, certainly not their own people. Forcing Australia to collude in what's a fairly destructive process is a hypocritical basis for public policy.''

http://www.smh.com.au/national/australias-basing-its-87m-secret-on-sensitive-absurdity-20091107-i2vy.html



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

Who knew Australia was such buddies with the United Arab Emirates, and who knew Australia has a base in Iraq?

It sounds like the Emirates is some kind of proxy for Western interests in the region.

The Houthis don't deserve to be attacked by Columbian mercenaries (and the rest of them) in their own country, irrespective of the military expert's history lesson.

Foreign powers are interfering with the Yemen's right to self-determination.

Might have to come back to look at this.  Trouble taking it all in.





Video - Dag Al Mani


Dag Al Mani
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------


This sounds pretty cool.

No idea what they're saying.

I just like the sound and energy.

I think it's Jordanian.




December 28, 2015

Modern History - Israel vs. Palestine List

History
Israel vs. Palestine


Israel War of Independence (1947-1949)
Jewish militias vs. Arab militias
turns to war on declaration of independence of Israel
& intervention of several Arab armies
settlement:  1949 Armistice Agreements
signed by Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria
armistice lines:  the Green Line

Reprisal Ops (1950s-1960s)
IDF military ops
response to Arab guerilla incursions
from Syria, Egypt & Jordan
Israel declares:  high 'blood cost' to enemy side
as deterrence from future attacks

Suez Crisis (1956)
Egypt attacked by:  Israel, Britain & France
intention to occupy Sinai Peninsula
& take over Suez Canal
response to Egypt decision to nationalise Suez Canal
(following US-Anglo withdrawal of offer to fund Aswan Dam)


Conclusion:
US & USSR (Soviet Russia) forced Israeli invasion to retreat
Israel reopened Straits of Tiran & pacified southern border

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Six Day War (1967)
Israel vs Egypt, Jordan & Syria

(contributors:  Iraq, Saudi Arab, Kuwait & Algeria)

Conclusion:  territory held by Israel expanded significantly
-->  The Purpose Line
  • West Bank (incl. East Jerusalem) - taken from Jordan
  • Golan Heights - taken from Syria
  • Sinai & Gaza - taken from Egypt
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
War of Attrition (1967-1970)
Egyptians seek to recapture Sinai from Israel
  • Egypt
  • Jordan
  • Syria
  • PLO
  • USSR
ceasefire 1970 - frontiers remain same

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
 
Operation Gift (1968)
29 Dec. 1968
Israeli IDF commandos destroy
  • 12 passenger aircraft
  • 2 cargo planes
at Beirut International Airport
response to attack on:  Israeli Airliner El Al Flight 253
by Palestinian Lebanon-based
militant org:  Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)

29 Dec. 1968
Israeli commandos destroy 14 aircraft #Lebanon
12 passenger aircraft +
2 cargo planes
@ $43.8 million - British insurers would not cover all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Israeli_raid_on_Lebanon
 
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Yom kuppur War (1973)
20-days
  • Arab states coalition
  • led by Egypt & Syria
  • seek to recapture territories
  • seized by Israel 6-Day War (1967)
  • surprise attack
  • Arab forces defeated
  • no significant territorial changes
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Palestinian Insurgency
     - South Lebanon (1971-1982)
    PLO relocated from Jordan to South Lebanon
    base for international ops
    attacks on Galilee, northern Israel
    Galilee
    1948 Arab–Israeli war outcome:
    nearly the whole of Galilee came under Israel control

    large portion of the population fled or was forced to leave
    leaving dozens of entire villages empty

    large Israeli-Arab community remained based in and near the cities:
    Nazareth, Acre, Tamra, Sakhnin, & Shefa-'Amr
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Israel response:  Op Litani (1978)
    first Israel large-scale invasion of Lebanon
    • IDF seek to expel PLO from Lebanon
    • ground & rocket attacks from Lebanon
    • Israel retaliation
    escalation --> leads to:  Lebanon War (1982)
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Lebanon War (1982)
    • IDF invade southern Lebanon to expel PLO
    Israeli response to:

    1.  terror attacks on northern Israel

    2.  assassination attempt
    against Shlomo Argov, Israel to UK ambassador
    assassination attempt by:   Abu Nidal org
    Result:

    1) exclusion of PLO from southern Lebanon

    2) 'Israeli Security Zone' in southern Lebanon
        (ie Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon)

    •     IDF was allied with Christian militias
        Israel eventually withdrew troops, May 2000
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    South Lebanon Conflict (1982-2000)
    20 years of warfare

    Israel IDF
    • + Israel proxy (Lebanese Christian militias)
    • vs. Muslim guerrillas (led by Iran-backed Hezbollah)
    in Israeli occupied southern Lebanon, claimed as 'security zone'
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    First Intifada (1987-1993)
    6 years
    large-scale Palestinian uprising against Israel
    West Bank & Gaza Strip

    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    Second Intifada (2000-2005)
    large-scale Palestinian uprising against Israel

    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Lebanon War (2006)
    Israeli military op
    • response to abduction x2 Israeli reservists by Hezbollah
    led to wider confrontation

    Hezbollah vs IDF

    UN brokered ceasefire

    thereafter, Israel lifted naval blockade of Lebanon

    result:
    1)  pacification of southern Lebanon
    2)  weakness of Hezbollah (serious casualties)
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    Gaza War (2008-2009)
    Dec-Jan - 3-week armed conflict

    Israel vs Hamas

    escalation of Israel-Palestine conflict

    rocket fire from Gaza Strip
    Israel response:  Op Cast Lead
    Op Cast Lead:  surprise Israel air-strike on Gaza Strip
    Israel attacked:
    • military targets
    • civilian targets
    • police stations
    • government buildings
    in opening assault
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    2013 - Peaceful Period
    • x50 rockets by Palestine
    • x10 Israel air-strikes
    • x44 Palestinians killed
    • 100 plus Palestinians injured
    • x6  Israel fatalities (x5 West Bank)
    • x44 Israel injuries 
    Israel | Palestine
    6 / 44 deaths
    44 / 100 injuries
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

      Operation Pillar of Defence (2012)
      Israel military offensive on Gaza Strip
      8-day IDF op
      • killing of Ahmed Jabari, chief Hamas
      • launch of large numbers of Hamas rockets
      • IED explosion on Israeli side of tunnel under Israeli Est Bank barrier
      Hamas alleges: 
      • IDF attacks on Gaza civilians in lead-up to op
      Hamas cites: 
      blockade of Gaza Strip & Occupation West Bank & East Jerusalem as reason for rocket attacks

      Hamas fired:
      • over 1,456 rockets into Israel

      Op Pillar of Defence:
      • IDF struck over 1,500 sites in Gaza Strip

      result:
       Israel
      • rockets killed x3 Israeli civilians
      • a home in Kiryat Malachi received a direct hit
      Palestine
      UNHCR report:
      • 174 Palestinians were killed
      • 100s wounded
      • large number of families displaced

      Israeli operation condemned by:
      • Iran
      • Russia
      • Egypt
      • Turkey
      • + several other Arab & Muslim countries
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
      Operation Brother's Keeper
      IDF initiated 11-day op

      in search of x3 kidnapped Israeli teenagers
      • 350 Palestinians arrested
      • arrest of nearly all Hamas West Bank leaders
      • x5 Palestinians killed
      • Hamas denied responsibility for kidnapping
      • suspect confessed
      under Israel Shin Bet (internal security) heavy torture
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

      Gaza War (2014)
      Operation Protective Edge (2014)
      Miv'tza Tzuk Eitan
      (lit. Operation Strong Cliff)

      50-day war


      Israel military offensive on Gaza Strip

      lead-up:
      • kidnap & murder x3 Israeli teenagers
      • kidnap & murder of Palestinian teenager
      • increased rocket attacks on Israel by Hamas
      J. J. Goldberg, editor Forward: 
      • Israel military indictment contains no evidence of orders from Hamas
        --> kidnapping organised by lone actors
        assumed that kidnappers planned prisoner swap
        • Israel kills x2 suspects in shoot-out
          • first suspect (lone-acting, member of Hamas)
          • imprisoned - x3 life terms (+ compensation)

            Israel
            targeted destruction of homes
            of Hamas and other militia members
            violates international humanitarian law
            -- > constitute war crimes    [wikipedia]
            ** this is not full extent of the alleged war crimes

            3,700 rockets fired towards Israel

            32 Hamas tunnels destroyed by Israel

            750 Palestinians - alleged Hamas militants & commanders killed by Israel

            2014 Gaza War - COSTS
            • Palestinians killed: 2,139
            • Palestinian children killed: 490
            • Israeli soldiers killed: 64
            • Israeli civilians killed: 6
            • Israeli children killed: 1
            • Palestinians wounded: 11,000
            • Palestinian children wounded: 3,000
            • Gaza residents displaced: Up to 500,000
            • Homes destroyed in Gaza: 20,000
            Source: UN
            via Independent:  Independent
            Other cost:  international aid


            Israel  |  Palestine

            71 dead / 2,193 dead

            ? wounded  / 11,000 wounded

            ? displaced / 500,000 displaced



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel



            ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

            COMMENT

            Most of the above info is as per the Wikipedia entries.

            It's just my summary, in the hope of remembering some of this.

            Figures haven't been double-checked and I've not looked further  into the war crimes issue.




            December 27, 2015

            West Bank - IDF Beating & Torturing Detainees



            West Bank



            If this hasn't properly loaded, click on the source link to view video clip at source.
            [It's driving me bananas not knowing if it's loaded or not.  I've done a conversion, but I still can't see clip on this blog without a plug-in.]

            The clip caught my attention because it looked brutal.

            ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------


            Meanwhile, Israel cabinet approves law against anti-government non-government organisations (NGOs)
            [27.12.2015 - spiegel.de]



            Brief video clip of the preceding NGO debate on Israeli TV below:


            [It sounds like 'sheshen' is 'six' in Hebrew]

            Israel Hayom

            http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=30405

            27.12.2015

            Newsletter Monday December 14, 2015

            Likud MK seeks to label foreign-funded NGOs as 'plants'

            MK Yoav Kisch introduces a bill that aims to curtail nongovernmental organizations funded mostly by foreign governments, as they "represent foreign political interests," use funds to promote anti-Israel propaganda • "We have to put a stop to it," he says.

            Gideon Allon and Israel Hayom Staff

            Likud MK Yoav Kisch on Sunday introduced a legislation proposal seeking to label nongovernmental organizations operating in Israel while receiving the majority of their funding from foreign governments as "plants" or "agents" of the governments funding them.

            The bill seeks to impose stricter record keeping and reporting guideline on such NGOs, and bar them from fostering collaborations with government ministries and the military, unless specifically authorized by the Justice Ministry.

            The bill's abstract further says the legislation seeks to allow both the "proper authorities and the public with tools to counter the erosion of democracy and the promotion of and internal delegitimization of the State of Israel, funded by foreign political entities."

            The proposal suggests any infringement by NGOs on the new guidelines will incur a 100,000 shekel ($26,000) fine, and that should any group be linked "to hostile activities, the Registrar of Associations will be able to petition the court for its dissolution."

            Kisch's legislation proposal states, "There are various associations operating in the State of Israel that receive support and funding from foreign political entities, making them 'plants' in the midst of Israeli society. These groupers effectively represent foreign political interests, as he who has the money has the final say.

            "There is a clear phenomenon in Israel by which these foreign interests undermine Israel's ability to defend itself and/or jeopardizes its Jewish and democratic character. While these associations promote foreign interests they still qualify for various exemptions, despite the fact the Israeli public is harmed, directly, by their actions," the bill said.

            "A democracy has to be able to defend itself," Kisch explained. "It's inconceivable that foreign-funded NGOs use those funds to spread lies and anti-Israel propaganda worldwide.

            "We will not allow foreign funding of this nature to attack Israeli soldiers, urge boycotts against Israel, and supporting terrorism or enemy states under the guise of a legitimate Israeli association. We have to put a stop to it," he said.

            http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=30405


            Haaretz

            http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.694082?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


            NGO Bill: Assault on Democracy or Legitimate Effort to Guard Against Foreign Intervention?


            The controversial non-profit bill that got the backing of a ministerial panel on Sunday will remain a subject of heated debate but is expected to pass in some form.

            Haaretz Dec 27, 2015 4:33 PM

            A bill that would require non-profit organizations that get more than half their funding from foreign governments to disclose that in various contexts passed a major legislative hurdle on Sunday. It received the backing of the Ministerial Committee for Legislation. Approval by the committee means that it now has the backing of the governing coalition, making it likely that it will pass in some form, although it could be subject to changes before final passage.

            Sponsored by
            Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked of the Habayit Hayehudi party, the bill is widely seen as an effort to draw attention to left-wing organizations that get funding from foreign governments. The activities of left-wing organizations have been in the headlines recently in part over funding some of them receive from foreign governments, notably European ones, a situation that critics call an improper effort by the governments to influence the Israeli public agenda. Opponents of the legislation call it an anti-democratic attempt to stigmatize left-wing groups and point out that right-wing Israeli non-profit organizations also get substantial funding from abroad, although that money is not from foreign governments, coming instead from individual donors abroad, notably from Diaspora Jewish donors.

            As currently drafted, the bill proposed by Shaked would require representatives of organizations receiving over half their support from foreign governments to wear tags with the name and the group they represent when they attend Knesset sessions, as is currently required of Knesset lobbyists. Violations of the law would be punished by barring the representatives' access to the Knesset. The bill would also require the groups to disclose in their official publicity that they get more than half their funds from foreign governments, along with disclosing the donor governments by name. Violations of this provision would be subject to a 29,000 shekel ($7,450) fine.

            "Any country wishing to protect its sovereignty must put limits on intervention by foreign entities," Shaked said, adding that false information spread by non-profit groups "pretending to represent Israel's interests but which actually are financed by foreign countries that exploit these groups to suit their agenda" constitute a weapon directed against Israel.

            But for his part, Zionist Union party leader Isaac Herzog called the bill "a serious stain on democracy," while his party colleague Nachman Shai warned that it would provide "ammunition to those calling for Israel's isolation."

            At the beginning of the month, four senior lawmakers from Germany warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that advancement of the legislation would make it harder for Israel's allies in Germany to aid it in the face of boycotts or attempts to delegitimize it.

            Tzipi Livni
            , who is co-leader of the Zionist Union along with Herzog, has submitted her own bill that would require disclosure by non-profits that get sizeable foreign government support but also require groups that depend upon individual donors from abroad to disclose it, in practice also imposing legislative regulation on right-wing groups. Justice Minister Shaked's office said including recipients of contributions from individual donors from abroad was considered but was not pursued because of legal hurdles that it presented.

            Im Tirtzu vs. Breaking the Silence

            The right-wing political group Im Tirtzu recently made headlines for a video it released stigmatizing leaders of left-wing organizations that it said received substantial foreign government funding as foreign "moles."

            Breaking the Silence, a group founded by Israel Defense Force veterans to expose misconduct by the Israeli army in the territories, has been a particular focus of public criticism. Representatives of the group have been barred by Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon from sending representatives onto army bases and by Education Minister Naftali Bennett from appearing in the country's public schools. The Breaking the Silence website states that among the financial support that it receives are funds from the governments of Norway, Spain and Switzerland as well as a number of foreign private foundations.

            Prior to the vote in the ministerial committee, Michael Oren, who is a former Israeli ambassador to the United States and is now member of the Knesset from the Kulanu party, which is a part of the governing coalition, said he could not vote in favor of the bill as currently drafted.

            "As someone who has worked his entire life to advance the State of Israel's foreign affairs, my conscience does not allow me to vote for the non-profits bill as it is drafted today."  Oren said.  "The non-profits bill that is reaching a vote at the Ministerial Committee for Legislation today is a bill that could harm Israel's foreign relations and image," he added. "I have no doubt that left-wing non-profits such as Breaking the Silence are working to undermine the legitimacy of the State of Israel, and it is our duty as lawmakers to reveal their funding sources to the public. But such one-sided exposure, which ignores the funding sources of extreme-right non-profits, might play exactly into the hands of those elements that are trying to boycott us," Oren said.

            http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.694082?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


            SUMMARY - Haaretz info
            Summary

            (Parliament) Knesset lobbyists
            to wear name tags with name of group they represent


            NGOS receiving over half their support from foreign govts
            to wear name tags with name of govt they receive funding from

            violations result in barred access to parliament (Knesset)
            & in monetary fines

            right-wing groups receving money from
            individual donors abroad are exempt from same standard

            Breaking the Silence
            group founded by IDF veterans
            (donors include Norway, Spain & Switzerland govts)
            expose misconduct of IDF

            *barred from sending representatives to army bases

            *barred from appearing at Israel's public schools

            legislation will be targeted by BDS campaigners
            German law-makers already notified Israel difficult to defend


            COMMENT

            The above video clip of Palestinians being beaten by Israeli soldiers is pretty sickening to watch.  After the initial viewing, I couldn't view again.

            I've seen other things (eg. IDF soldiers beating up an old Palestinian man about to have his house demolished, and an IDF soldier striking an old woman), so it's not like this is an aberration.  And the bet is that what I've seen is just a fraction of the brutality.

            Also, I tend to avoid looking at what is happening in territories occupied by Israel, because I can't handle the dissonance.  The image I have of Israel is of its ancient history, its Temple, its songs and things that are pleasant ... seeing old people getting beaten ruins that.

            It's very unpleasant to see this kind of brutality, and it's impossible not to be appalled and sorry for the Palestinians that are being mistreated.

            Norway, Spain or Switzerland government funding of Israeli NGOs is far less of a potential 'de-legitimiser' of Israel than what the IDF have been caught doing to civilians in Palestine.

            For a country that has so many pro-Israel interest groups abroad lobbying other governments on its behalf, and for a country whose organisations are involved in, basically, a program of indoctrinating Western journalists and politicians by hosting 'educational' visits to Israel (including an Israeli hospital where Israel's been patching up Syrian 'rebels' - ie anti-Syrian government Islamists), it's somewhat hypocritical of Israel to put up barriers to NGOs that receive funding from other government organisations (while shielding Israel's right-wing NGOs from being subject to the similar measures).

            But Israel can always be counted on to do the rational thing:  ie. to act in its own interests and in pursuit of its own aims.

            In an ideal world, this is how one handles foreign interests potentially asserting influence on internal affairs, and this is how one handles fifth column elements within one's state.

            But, as mentioned in the article, this will be something the BDS campaigners might wish to exploit, especially considering Israel's strong reliance on representing itself as a democracy.

            I highly doubt that the governments of Norway, Spain and Switzerland are actually seeking to undermine or de-legitimise Israel in any way, but the intention isn't relevant if the result is seen as the undermining of Israel's interests and aims.

            This is a brilliant move on Israel's part to de-legitimise, diminish and silence leftist internal critics -- particularly critics of Israel's military (and occupation territory settlements, I'm guessing).

            But will it backfire?


             Spiegel
            Google Translation
            German to English




            Assange - Denied Medical Treatment

            Article
            SOURCE
            'Navidad con Assange' / 'Assange Christmas'
            Spanish:  http://www.entornointeligente.com/articulo/7609906/-26122015
            English Google trans: https://archive.is/jium4



            EXTRACT ONLY
            GOOGLE TRANSLATION
            SPANISH / ENGLISH

            Saturday, December 26, 2015

            But the decline is evident. He can barely move his right shoulder because of pain that came and visited the doctors who have been unable to diagnose, partly because the British authorities do not allow him to move to a medical center to get an MRI or CT scan. He has a broken tooth that bit by something hard in [his] food during a brief stay in a British prison. An extraction or at least a root canal is needed, but his request to visit a dental office has also been rejected. To ease your pain take pills every day. For a time his doctors gave him morphine, but months ago they changed the drug, he says, without the change will produce a withdrawal. Has spent two years trying to get a doctor to treat him, beyond the informal visit, because several British and German doctors who had consulted refused because his insurance did not cover the Ecuadorian jurisdiction and because they feared that association with Assange could hurt them professionally.

            These potentially dangerous physical ailments increasingly noticeable pale from lack of sunlight and an obvious lack of muscle tone due to lack of exercise add up. As the embassy is located on the ground floor, more than three years since climbs a ladder ago. Before hurting his shoulder practiced boxing with a Wikileaks volunteer working life bodyguard wins, but since then the only activity performed is walking and jogging on a treadmill. Which it makes less and less because the tape will reinforce the feeling of confinement because he did not go anywhere and do not enlarge the objects as you go on your walk and approaches them, as would happen if he were released. Near him they say that Assange has lost all notion of time and space, spends hours without realizing that evening turns into night and despite his inactivity slimline because rarely remembers eating until one of his staff tells you. As he has received multiple death threats, even threats of crazy Americans ...

            English Google trans: https://archive.is/jium4


            'Christmas With Assange'
            Open Democracy - English Translation (Full Article)




            ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

            COMMENT

            Article isn't easy reading because it's only a Google translate from Spanish.

            I've only plucked out these bits that relate to Assange health concerns.

            Getting medical treatment, as an assylee in an embassy, isn't straightforward.

            It doesn't help that the British are denying Assange access to medical treatment.

            The British are obviously determined not to let up on the political persecution (and the pressure) they are subjecting him to, ahead of intended arrest and extradition.

            Ireland, surely there's an ex-IRA dentist that's willing to pull out a tooth, and maybe an ex-IRA doctor that's not afraid of attending the Ecuador embassy in London?

            Otherwise:  doctors campaigning re full inquiry into Dr David Kelly's death, might not be too intimated by the state (and might be worth approaching, by the sound of them):   2004 and 2013.