Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Don't know what happened. I just couldn't contain the anger and frustration, I guess.
While I was preparing something to eat, I was being harangued about my faults or whatever. I can't even remember what it was exactly that was the issue with me.
But it's the same old scene being played out. I expect it began with my complaint about the drinking or something similar - or I just asked to be left in peace.
Yes, I asked that he just watch some TV. Kept having something of a go at me in that sort of semi-drunk way: not completely off his face, but drunk enough to be frustrating and annoying.
As usual, unresponsive to whatever need I express.
Good example is if I were to plainly state that I am distressed and cannot take more of whatever, it's like a signal to amp up whatever it is that I've specifically asked that he desist.
In this case, I think I'd just had all I could take of him sort of arguing with me (where there was no argument from me), instead of heeding my need to be left in peace.
On and on and on it went, with him justifying himself, insisting on how martyred he is and how he was trying to 'help' and whatever else, talking over the top of me and persisting in doing my head in, where I've signalled: enough.
I haven't had that kind of angry outburst in years. I am no longer able to feel that degree of anger. Even now, I feel numb. I can't cry although I kind of wish I could.
'Domestic' in the making really began in the early hours of the afternoon. I figured he was outside drinking, but I was immersed in reading and I wasn't up for arguing about drinking. Also, when I did go out, he seemed reasonably sober. I guess I hoped he'd keep sober. But after several hours of drinking he's not exactly sober. While he's not rolling drunk, he's drunk enough to piss me off and drunk enough not to be receptive to what I'm saying and drunk enough to argue back at me over the top of what I've conveyed to him.
It finally did my head in and I had a complete meltdown.
It's impossible to have a proper conversation with someone who is intoxicated and unreceptive: he just argues back at me and whether I want to argue or not, it turns to argument.
It turns to his drinking, which he then insists 'isn't' a problem. But it's a f*cking problem if I'm telling him it's a problem from my perspective and if this has been at the root of every single f*cking argument he and I have had in what is now nearing 10 years.
It does my head in that he is ranting at me about how he's 'helping' me, when he's spent the afternoon destroying my plants. I had a huge rubber plant that he destroyed and put in the recycling bin and he's destroyed whatever water plants I had.
Yes, I've had a major depressive thing where I've not bothered with gardening, plants or anything else, to a ridiculous point where all that interests me is politics news, virtually all day ever day, like an addictive escapist thing.
For whatever reason, I find it rewarding and interesting, even though it's entirely pointless. Although I'm good for nothing, it feeds my mind at least. Hopefully, I'm learning something. However useless my learning.
As usual, whenever there is anything that's remotely critical on my part in relation to his drinking, his defensive method is to then have a go at me: about everything under the sun; and where I will insist that the drinking needs to stop, that I cannot deal with it and whatever else I convey at this point, he'll insist drinking is not the problem, that I am the problem, and he goes into all the things that are wrong with me.
It's the same f*cking argument being repeated almost 10 years down the track.
It then turns to an attack on the things that interest me and then an attack on my mental health: "You're mad," he'll insist.
Well, after the meltdown I had, that turned to "You're a nasty old bitch." WTF? It's not like he's twelve.
During some point he became physically intimidating and was saying how he's not going to "explode" or some shit, where he was heading towards me in the kitchen and I was bracing myself to either be whacked or grabbed by him, but he backed off.
At some point I got my phone and rang a third party to ask that they intervene and ask him not to drink, because I don't know from one day to the next what I'm doing here.
We'll be good for a day or two or whatever and I'll have the anxiety and the tensions or a full-blown argument (although not necessarily always a big one). Whatever it is, it's a constant disruption and I find myself constantly having to rethink WTF I'm doing. Where I settle on trying to co-exist, all that is overturned by the feeling that I simply cannot co-exist with someone who intends to continue to drink.
As in, he's semi-pissed and ranting about plans he has etc. All well and good having plans, but if I'm unable to cope with any more drinking after almost 10 years of this issue being a point of contention and of argument between us, then what good are any plans he has?
Even more concerning and pressure-inducing for me is having to make up my mind whether to move from the place that has been my home for much longer than he's been here: as in, having to suddenly just vacate my home to be finally done with this. It's not what I want to do, but if I can't negotiate to live sensibly in some way, what other option is open to me? I'm under pressure now, because I have to make legal decisions. Which probably explains the seismic meltdown that today's boozy session led to for me.
Through our argument - or during some point - he insists "I'm going to get tipsy every day" and "I'm allowed to drink ..." or some such crap, like I'm dealing with a f*cking child and like he hasn't heard a f*cking word of what I've said.
I've said enough. I've said no more. I've said no more drinking at home. I've said I can take no more of this. I've explained to him my anxiety.
We've had the same f*cking dramas since he's resumed drinking as we've had in the years before he had to have a break from drinking. So why does he not connect the dots and just stop with the f*cking drinking, when he's able to? It's not like he needs professional help. He's gone cold turkey before and he's managed, so why not just do it and be done with it, so we can at least co-exist without drama ... and if I'm really that sh*t, he needs to figure if he wants to remain here or if he wants to move.
I don't understand what it is about this that he can't understand. It's pretty basic. It's either drink and therefore leave or stop drinking, remain and try to co-exist.
Does he seriously think that we have this drama every few days because I'm a 'nasty c*nt'? Why does he not consider the possibility that I've had enough and cannot cope with any more of this?
What to him is probably just an argument while he's sort of buffered by intoxication is something different to me. I see the condition that he is in and I am not only disgusted, I'm freaked out about locking myself into more of the same. It is impossible to imagine just living like this for another ten years. I can't do it and I don't understand why he can't understand that I cannot do it. Does he really imagine I want to be homeless and aimlessly moving to some other place after all the time I've been here, and that this is just on whim on my part or because I'm a "nasty old bitch", or is there a possibility that I am completely depleted and sh*t scared of living out any more of this, because I'm at a point where I'm finished?
The numbness I feel is frightening. It has been a long time since I have felt this numb. Nothing enlivens me. Everything is dead to me. All that's left of a drive in me is my ability to read and take an interest in things far removed from me.
When he has a go at the things that interest me and starts behaving like a freak, pointing to my PC telling me "all of this will be gone" (presumably meaning he's disconnecting the internet when he leaves), I just feel disgusted because I'm looking at someone semi off his face, 'threatening' me with cutting off the internet, as if that is some kind of inducement for living with someone who is going to get sh*t-faced and argue with me every few days or whatever, where he's ignoring my voice and my simple request that he just stop the f*cking drinking because I can take no more of it.
While it's not an ideal solution, I'd even consider an arrangement where he spends every Friday night or something somewhere else getting drunk, but never drinks again here around me. But I can't even negotiate that. Nothing I say to him enters his skull. But, in hindsight, I don't think that's an ideal arrangement because it is simply feeding the habit and the habit is the problem. How can you commit to something when the other person cannot even commit to not drinking alcohol, where alcohol has been a point of contention and problem for years? It's impossible.
A lot of today's anger comes from having wasted maybe another 18 months of my life on this and on now facing being homeless, where we could have formally parted company 18 months ago and I may have been on back on my feet and somewhat functional by now - or at least stuck with nothing but my own dysfunction.
It wouldn't be easy for me, but I don't know what alternative there is when there is no stability in this situation. I tell him I'm going to have a breakdown and he just laughs at me and keeps repeating what I've told him I can no longer handle. I seriously cannot handle living with someone who is going to continue to drink when I've stated a clear limit in that regard and have been for the last 10 f*cking years. That is so degrading. No life is worth that kind of degradation.
Then I think about all the arguments we've had and I wonder why he's even here with me. Going by all the attacks on me, I'm the sh*ttiest person there is. So what else is there? I can't cope with living with someone who has shoved me in some 'sh*t-box', where we have a permanently contentious 'relationship' and I'm just sh*t in his eyes - which is obvious from how he perceives and 'relates' to me. Only there's not much relating going on here. We're really separate units. I've ground down to a complete, numb halt. He's happy when he's drinking. But I'm distressed. It just doesn't work.
I hate the arguments we have. They're so diminishing. The things he says to me diminish him in my eyes. What I hate most is that it's like dealing with a child. I don't have children. I have him. LOL
What I also find revolting is the way he sells me out. We'll be having an argument and he'll tell me how so-and-so sides with him and how he's told everyone I'm 'mad' and whatever else, like he's some f*cking martyr suffering here with me and he and his posse know where it's at. F*ck that. I'm not involved with whoever he's slagging me off to and I don't give a shit what they think about any of this. But the problem here is that I'm involved with someone who cannot have anything but an adversarial and arms-length weird and destructive 'relationship' with me, where I cannot even trust him in any way whatsoever, because he's a never-ending packet of f*cking psychological assault and betrayal of some kind or other.
I'm angry that he couldn't even have a proper break-up with me. Why the f*ck couldn't he just man up and have a proper discussion and proper break-up with me? We don't talk about anything. Lately, when he's sober, I've tried to talk to him to convey to him that I just cannot cope any longer, but he shuts me down. I'm shut down. I can't discuss anything. And the same thing gets replayed over and over again.
It's really weird living with someone who is sort of not there. It took me years to figure out that he's kind of not there, in the sense that he's not himself etc and that everything is mediated through an alcohol haze, when intoxicated. So I'm sort of dealing with two persons: the nice person and the intoxicated person. Dealing with the intoxicated person feels like having a wrestling match with the insane ... while he's insisting I'm the problem and I'm 'mad'.
It's probably just as strange to live with someone who either does not notice or does not care that I'm no longer there. As in, I may as well be inanimate: I'm always tuned into something online. How can he not notice or care that I'm not there?
We're both in our own worlds. His world is just fine, if I don't say anything about the drinking. But my world is not. I find it strange to be with someone for so long but to feel sometimes like this person is a complete stranger to me. It's shocking when it happens. It's shocking that after all this time I can feel so completely disconnected, but if you sort of live in separate worlds, where there is nothing shared or discussed, it's very hard to feel connected.
All the times he's had a go at me about what is essentially me, leaves me feeling I cannot even trust this person. To his mind, I'm the 'enemy' or something. It's always some adversarial thing and I'm the 'bad guy' and everything that I am and that interests me or that I express (or whatever else) is sh*t, according to him. So how the f*ck can we co-exist, if in this dynamic I am with someone who thinks I'm sh*t and someone I can't trust because he falls to bits any time he's criticised in any way and has some massive attack on me - as in, an attack on the fundamentals of me and what I am? LOL
Mostly I feel anxiety. I feel fear. I feel frustration. I feel anger. I feel guilt. Sometimes I feel really dreadful about myself. But mostly everything is kind of numbed down. Something inside of me is shut off. The anxiety feelings are the strongest when I try to sleep or when I know he's begun drinking. It takes a lot to stir anger in me because of the numbness I feel. Maybe that's depression. The meltdown I had today is an exception. I don't know where that anger came from.
I'm not sure that airing my dirty laundry has helped me. I feel a combination of distressed, numb and like crying, but I can't cry. Sometimes I think about ending it all when I feel especially overwhelmed, but that's more an impulse thing rather than a plan.
Doubt I'll be good for blogging about anything I've looked at.
Just trying to unwind as I wait for the rice and chicken dish I'm preparing finish cooking. I don't even know how I managed to cook something through that. As in, how I managed to resume cooking after the outburst I had. I can feel a headache coming on. Extremely tense.
Began experiencing anxiety about the duration of time I thought Mr Semi-Off-His-Face was outside drinking after our argument.
Went out to look for him but couldn't find him.
Checked refrigerator. He's taken a six-pack of beer.
Tried calling. Phone either diverting to message bank, or he's on a call.
Sent a text to his brother to check on his safety because the behaviour is unusual (and because he's said crap when he's drunk that has me worried about his disappearing).
Who leaves home with a six-pack?
What an asshole he is.
Didn't even bother telling me ... or leaving me with any cigarettes.
I'm now twice as strung out as I was.
I can't take any more of his sh*t.
With any luck he'll clear off of his own volition so I can salvage what is left of my life.
Sh*t. He's returned. This is no good.
Fumbled with the keys but managed to get inside. Smashed. Swaying.
Says I'm a "c*nt".
Sitting on the couch holding his head.
Tried to get him to go to bed. Says that's what he's doing. But he's still sitting there on the couch.
I might have to grab my phone, keys and cigarettes quietly and if need be, f*ck off from here.
There goes my listening to Red Ice Radio about Hillary. LOL
I feel sort of sick in the stomach.
Might go outside and smoke (bought cigarettes earlier).
This is seriously f*cked.
This is precisely why I insist that he does not drink around me.
Drink in the park or wherever he was and return home isn't what I had in mind.
This is also why I have insisted on telling him that he cannot 'control' drink.
Called out "fucking shut up" as he can he my keystrokes.
Yle
Yleisradio Oy
aka Rundradion
aka Finnish Broadcasting Company
f. 1926
Finland's national public-broadcasting company
99.98% owned by the Finnish state
modelled on BBC (British Bullsh*t Channel)
slogan: Sinun tarinasi ('Your Story')
more like: Our Propaganda
ATTACK ON FREE PRESS FINLAND COVERS UP FOREIGNER RAPES & CRIME --------------------------------------------------------
Ilya Janitskin detained - can be requested extradition from Spain
Published October 7, 2016 at 10:11
Foreign. Ilya Janitskin, the principal behind the so-called alternative news site MV-Lehtinen, was arrested yesterday in absentia by the Helsinki District Court, writes the Finnish YLE.
Janitskin accused of incitement to racial hatred, fundraising crime, gaming crimes, aggravated defamation, assault, breach of confidentiality and copyright crimes, writes Yle. The crimes were allegedly committed in 2015 and in 2016.
MV-Lehtinen is a Finnish-language news site that have seen a real boost in the past year. The reason is the many immigration-related crime that engulfed the country in asylkaosets track.
In November last year, was gang-raped a 14-year-old girl in Finnish Ostrobothnia. And, as in Cologne, Germany and several other European cities were large groups of immigrants to attack and sexofredade women in Helsinki during the New Year's night. Such scares, and dozens of others of a similar nature, concerned about the Finns.
Therefore, many came to the MV-Lehtinen who has become a thorn in the side of politicians as well as established media companies. The authorities have tried in vain to close the site and therefore has decided to bust the people behind it.
Yle has also gone out and warned other "alternative media" and also urged Finns to not read Swedish newspapers and news sites like Friatider, Nyheter Idag, Dispatch International and Avpixlat.
According to the Swedish-language Hufvudstadsbladet, a news which is also strongly hostile to the MV-Lehtinen, there can be talk of a European arrest warrant against Janitskin.
Ilya Janitskin, allegedly living in Spain, may in such cases be requested extradition from Spain.
Home www.mvlehti.net
Type only media
languages Finnish
Designed by Ilya Janitskin
Opened 2014
Odinin Sotilaat SOLDIERS OF ODIN
More
Finland's news is mainly from the United States, according to the founder Ilya Janitskin, and there is very little coverage of issues such as the Palestinian issue due to the nature of the media domination in USA. [wikipedia / Finland / translation]
Finnish Broadcasting Company YLE reported Soldiers of Odin's leader Mika Ranta has links with the MV-magazine. [wikipedia / Finland / translation]
Finland Wikipedia entry is littered with the usual Wikipedia 'conspiracy theories' claims found in the English variety of this propaganda and indoctrination organ of American capitalism.
One controversy is about a motion that MP Anna Hagwall recently submitted to parliament. In the short motion advocates Hagwall a press subsidies abolished, and also wants to see a greater spread of ownership of the Swedish media companies.
- Let the little Bonnierska newspapers in the provinces go under. No family, ethnic group or company should be allowed to control more than five per cent of the media, she writes in an email to Aftonbladet.
Hagwall want to draw in press subsidies to Bonnier-owned newspapers, even though most of the group's magazines do not get press support. Many have interpreted her move that anti-Semitic and that she aims at a large Jewish ownership and influence over the Swedish media.
[Comment:
meanwhile dated video turns up / something anti-Semitic - translation
difficult to understand / associated with the political party making
motion re concentrated media ownership, I believe ]
Rape Accused gets 241,000 in damages
Published October 6, 2016 at 10:42
By Mattias Albinsson
Domestic. The four men who in June was acquitted of charges of gang rape aboard the Finnish boat M / S Galaxy are now over 240,000 in damages, type SVT.
The court stated in its judgment that the girl was subjected to a cabin on the ferry March 30, the men took turns having sex with her, should not be regarded as rape. Among other things, since she admitted that she stripped naked and no one even stopped her from leaving the cab.
Demonstration in support of the raped woman - "Leave this country, dirty animal!"
Published October 5, 2016 at 23:38
By Mattias Albinsson
Domestic. A hundred Gotlanders demonstrated Wednesday night in support of the woman who reported that she was gang-raped in Visby during the weekend, writes whole island.
Since none of the suspects in custody is requested their identity is not known. A new law took effect on 1 October as restricting the right of access in order to protect criminal suspects who have not yet been arrested or charged with crimes.
Storm of protest against the police for the silence about rape men ethnicity
Published October 2, 2016 at 21:59
By Mattias Albinsson
Domestic. Gotlanders Many are outraged that the police did not come out with more information, such as race, the six men suspected of gang rape in Visby Saturday night.
he indignant protests during the day flowed in Gotland Police's Facebook page, which forced the authorities to hide the comments to a number of posts.
In particular, many outraged because the police Gotland as recently as this week called for the two perpetrators in connection with an assault on two young immigrants. The perpetrators were described then as "very Swedish."
This time, many people suspect that rapists are "very foreign" or "very osvenska" and that's why the police are tight-lipped. On this turn, however, the police area manager Torbjörn Nilsson from criticism.
"We are basically restrictive to specify ethnicity, identifying data or other data such as age, appearance and addresses. We specify, however, so at times it is important to make progress in the investigation and we need the public's help. Otherwise, not" he writes.
Checking out what the response is to the latest stunning WikiLeaks release (The Podesta E-mails):
[ Try 'WEAPONISED MEDIA PROPAGANDA' ]
Propaganda article headline:
'Weaponised' WikiLeaks dumps Hillary Clinton's speeches to Wall Street [LINK ARTICLE]
is attempting to associate a media organisation providing whistleblower information to the public as 'weaponised' by conflating the made up propaganda-babble with the whistleblower publishing organisation, WikiLeaks ... before going on to refer to whistleblower media publishing as the act of 'dumping'. Nice one.
Meanwhile, they're dumping American propaganda on the unsuspecting public.
Note reference to 'McClatchy' at base of what is ostensibly an 'Australian' article and the further reference to McClatchy, which is merely an American publishing company (which is not explained), in the body of the article, as if this American publishing organisation is somehow the oracle of authenticating digital data ... which nobody is claiming is *not* authentic, as US politicians and their handlers duck and weave, refusing to confirm authenticity (which is a dead give-way ... and WikiLeaks has a 100% record of providing authentic documents, so I'm going to take a wild guess and say that these are authentic documents provided to the organisation by a whistleblower):
"McClatchy could not verify the authenticity of the emails"
Ho-hum. So much for that nowhere information that could potentially lead an unsuspecting reader to believe that the documents themselves could not be authenticated. LOL. Sneaky capitalist press needs a good, hard spanking.
Information regarding 'McClatchy' below:
The McClatchy Company established: 1857 159-year history publicly traded US publishing company Sacramento, California Revenue US$ 1.056 Billion (2015) [wikipedia]
Article is very sneaky:
"... revelation that may perpetuate criticism"
The choice of words intends, in my opinion, to soften or blunt the stark reality of what these revelations disclose about candidate Clinton, and the words "perpetuate criticism" would almost suggest that criticism is undeserved ... as if criticism of candidate Clinton lies in a vacuum that is divorced of the facts of the global chaos that has been generated by the former US Secretary of State, Clinton, while in public office.
That's how I take it when I see Clinton presented in this manner in the media, after exposure of her duplicity and patent unsuitability as President of a nation that is effectively a world hegemon.
"anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks"
Subtle presentation of the whistleblower publisher media organisation, WikiLeaks, in a negative light: as 'anti-secrecy' VERSUS being pro-transparency.
Very sneaky, especially when we consider the fact that you cannot have a democracy without a high level of integrity, transparency and informed public consent.
"Clinton's campaign declined to confirm authenticity ..."
Of course it declined.
Denial and #BlamePutin is apparently US capitalist politician fall-back strategy.
"Obama administration accused Russia of being behind the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers in June ..."
Errrrr, not exactly. Look at the joint US government agency statement document highlighted above.
US officials sought to smear and made allegations about their ehem, 'beliefs', before proceeding to state:
"We are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government"
The sneaks have thrown in the word 'now' to give the impression that they will some day substantiate their smear. LOL
So there you have it.US government cannot attribute to the Russian government activity that led to release of information, just as the Russian government spokesman says. LOL
Meanwhile in the capitalist owned press:
CLINTON CAMPAIGN SPOX via McCLATHCY via SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
"Earlier today the US government removed any reasonable doubt that the Kremlin has weaponised WikiLeaks to meddle in our election and benefit Donald Trump's candidacy," Clinton campaign spokesman Glen Caplin said. "We are not going to confirm the authenticity of stolen documents released by Julian Assange, who has made no secret of his desire to damage Hillary Clinton."
What the f*ck? Can Glen Caplin not read, or is he spinning the public tosh? Given the US DHS and DNI joint statement above, specifically stating:
"We are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government"
Not only is the Kremlin being smeared here, so is Aussie journalist-publisher, Julian Assange, who is accused of harbouring a "desire to damage" the Witch of Wall Street, after WikiLeaks have published public interest whistleblower material released to the organisation ... versus suppressing this vital public interest information, as perhaps the capitalist-owned and controlled, propaganda press would have done?
LMAO ... "documents can be faked as part of a sophisticated Russian misinformation campaign".
Now they're suggesting they're faked documents: documents they refuse to authenticate. Hello? LOL
TO APPEAR BALANCED, WESTERN CAPITALIST MEDIA PUBLISHES THE FOLLOWING ... but after all the spin-doctoring in Western media, and after decades of Cold War anti-Russian / anti-Slavic entertainment media propaganda being broadcast from capitalist-controlled Hollywood, who in the West is likely to accept the world of an unknown Russian minister, one might ask:
"There is no proof whatsoever for such grave accusations,"[Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov]
"(They are) ...fabricated by those who are now serving an obvious political order in Washington, continuing to whip up unprecedented anti-Russian hysteria." [Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov]
The capitalist-owned & capitalist serving media immediately then highlights the Clinton Campaign Spox spin:
“The Kremlin has weaponised WikiLeaks to meddle in our election and benefit Donald Trump's candidacy.” [Glen Caplin, Clinton campaign spokesman]
Throughout the article is an attempt to dignify and elevate what is an unindicted criminal, capitalist-backed presidential candidate, Shillary Clinton, with the title: 'Mrs Clinton'. As if, being associated with unindicted war criminal and molester of staff Bill Clinton, is somehow an honour.
"Clinton has repeatedly refused to release transcripts of her speeches"
Ummmm ... no wonder, when she dreams of a global capitalist slave state and destruction of national boundaries and homelands.
SINCE 2013, SHILLARY CLINTON MADE:
$US21.5 million ($28 million) on speeches post role as US Secretary of State [SMH]
Goldman Sachs 24 Oct 2013 speech, Clinton sings the praises of "Wall Street insiders" and their remarkable ability to self-regulate. Guess Shillary knows which side her bread's buttered on? LOL
The article then dwells at length on Shillary Clinton's smear against US capitalist targets: China and Russia.
However, it is the US that has been spying not only on all US citizens in secret and in contravention of rights enshrined in the US constitution, but has also spying on entire countries abroad and on their leaders, in partnership with their capitalist offsider's agents, GCHQ.
Reince Priebus, the Republican National Committee chairman:
"With today's WikiLeaks revelations we are finding out who Hillary Clinton really is, and it's not hard to see why she fought so hard to keep her transcripts of speeches to Wall Street banks paying her millions of dollars secret" ""The truth that has been exposed here is that the persona Hillary Clinton has adopted for her campaign is a complete and utter fraud. How can Bernie Sanders and many like-minded Democrats continue to support her candidacy in light of these revelations?""
Surprised the article included this comment from the RNC chairman, who sums it up quite correctly.
How can Bernie Sanders and Democrats continue to support Shillary's candidacy?
Uuummmm ... maybe they're much the same scumbags Shillary is.
Elon University Poll: "effect would be minimal"
LOL ... assuming the 'poll' is not an attempt at capitalist social engineering in favour of Wall Street's presidential candidate.
Otherwise, no wonder the 'effect would be minimal' when all mainstream media ownership is concentrated in capitalist conglomerate hands and comprises a mere six (6) controlling capitalist interests.
"Hey, look over there-- "
McClatchy (or is it SMH?) then inserts some garbage about Trump having allegedly uttered something about grabbing women "by the pussy", circa 2005. That's about as good as calling someone a c*nt back in 1988.
NEVER MIND PUSSY ... CONSIDER US CAPITALIST GLOBAL DOMINATION & CAPITALIST MILITARY MIGHT IN HANDS OF ONE WHO HAS ALREADY MISUSED THAT IMMENSE POWER
Take it that Trump is not running around grabbing vaginas, or women would have been suing in droves by now ... so how relevant is this in the wider non-indoctrinated (and non-Pavlovian) scheme of things, when you have a US presidential candidate that advocates a public and a private face (which should be of real concern, not only to the US but to countries with alliances with this capitalist train-wreck); and a US presidential candidate that was instrumental in destroying the economy of Iran; the destruction of Libya during the US and allied capitalist orchestrated coup and attendant war of aggression on Libya - where Hillary Clinton, as US Secretary of State, went against the advice of US military of the time, committing instead the destruction of a functioning state that was cooperative with the US, that led to the brutal torture-murder of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi (which Hillary has a giggle about in the video below), the subsequent killing in Libya of a US Ambassador and other US officers, the arming of surrounding Islamists, the CIA engineered destruction of Syria by channelling weapons and Islamists to Syria, the rise of Islamic terrorism in the region and the resulting civil war that has been destroying the country since 2011, plus the displacement of millions that are flooding Europe.
But Trump said something stupid about 'pussy' in 2005 and we should all be outraged by such a thing?
Does anyone in actually swallow this capitalist owned and controlled media garbage these days?
Unfortunately, I suspect that this sneaky sort of propaganda is generally quite effective, because the time-poor public usually does not comb over the narrative of the propaganda press and propaganda politicians, or otherwise invest time in connecting the dots in order to establish a more coherent picture that's absent from capitalist propaganda isolated propaganda pieces that are broadcast to the unsuspecting Western public by their Czarist US-Anglo Capitalist masters.
Vegetables included eggplant (skin scorched on flame and rubbed off in cold water); onion, garlic; carrot; green beans; potatoes; tomato (tinned); Cannellini beans (tinned).
Browned chicken thigh fillets (cubed), cooked off bacon, onion etc. White whine de-glaze & cook down wine some. Optional tomato paste. A little brown sugar. Bay leaves & no other herbs, as I was too lazy. 4 cups Chicken stock.
Was worried smoky eggplant would be overpowering, but it turned out very nice.
Very easy meal to prepare. Made loads. Enough there to freeze.
Was in a good frame of mind, but dragging me down was having to monitor another person's drinking. Or feeling like I have to ... feeling anxious.
After a couple of smallish arguments (nothing spectacular ... but the whole thing disturbs me), my mood has plunged completely and I'm sort of having a freak-out that I can't cope with more but also having a freak-out because I can't control it or end it.
Felt like crying, but I almost never cry. I'm now just sort of freaked out and stunned. I feel kind of numb.
There's never any getting through to this person. I don't know what I'm doing any longer.
As in, there's never any opportunity to speak to him to explain to him that it is either the end of the drink or the end of the line for me. He won't listen when he's sober and he certainly doesn't listen when he's drunk.
Maybe the best thing I can do is to just move. This sh*t will never end, because he's insane. LOL
Right this minute, I hate him for putting me through this sh*t for years on end.
ROUND #2
Finally exhausted, I try to crash out. But I can't.
Rolling anxiety.
D*ckhead wakes up and blames me for his runny nose. Apparently, I'm 'responsible' for his runny nose because I woke him. That's the mentality and 'logic' I'm up against.
Nasty piece of work. The attitude. The tone of his voice. The hostility.
Reasonable requests met with flicking the bedding in my face and being a complete d*ckhead.
No amount of reasonably speaking to this person makes any difference.
Does the stonewall number on me when aggression is met with aggression.
I'm so angry I'm bodily shaking. It's a whole body experience.
I'm stuck here living out this f*cking lunacy again and again because I cannot negotiate any kind of end to this, be it a peace or a parting.
I wish I had the capacity to just knock him off his feet.
Considers himself 'entitled' to drink. WTF? I have to live with it. Which part of that is so hard to understand?
Which part of 'no' is incomprehensible to him?
I'm dealing with the f*cking insane.
I can't keep repeating this. I can't stand any more of this.
Gives public insight into the real, unelected power behind the White House façade ... and a preview of what to expect (and who to expect to rule behind the curtain) in the event of electing Shillary Clinton.
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
