TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

August 30, 2015

Assange - The Guardian - Forthcoming Opinion Piece - by US Guardian blogger and polemicist Jessica Valenti

Julian Assange


Re:  The Guardian
Forthcoming Opinion Piece
by US Guardian blogger 
& polemicist Jessica Valenti


Earlier post regarding the above  |  here

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Check this out
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
source | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Hello?

Jessica Valenti was what, de facto, amounts to an early PR supporter of one of the alleged accusers (I say, 'alleged', because both women have publicly denied (& therefore discounted) Sweden police allegations - here).

Check out the date of Valenti's post (above).  Dated 17th December 2010. 

That's a mere 10 days following Assange's mass media covered, theatrical, state managed, & state exploited arrest in London. Bet the dust hadn't even settled.

So much for The Guardian's proposed 'opinion' piece ... and their denial of right of reply to journalist, Julian Assange.
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Please Support
Julian Assange

Under Siege
Ecuador embassy
London (3 Years)
Detained 5 Years
No Charge
FAQ & Support
https://justice4assange.com/


August 29, 2015

Contrasts





Parisian Women, 1930s
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.


57,000 German POWs, Moscow, July 1944
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.


Iran, mid-late 1800s
Execution by Cannon

ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

all photos from | here


---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------



Always thought there was one 'n' in cannon.

Apparently, there's not.




Assange - Death Threats, CIA Kidnap Concern


EXTRACT ONLY
FULL AT SOURCE
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Assange-Lives-in-Fear-of-Kidnapping-Assassination-20150829-0004.html

Julian Assange says he rarely makes public appearances due to mounting security concerns.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange fears kidnapping and assassination, according to an interview published Saturday.

Speaking to the U.K.'s The Times magazine, Assange said he has received threats from “unstable people,” and rarely makes appearances from the Ecuadorean embassy due to security concerns.

“There are security issues with being on the balcony. There have been bomb threats and assassination threats from various people,” he told the magazine.

Rogue death threats aren't Assange's only concerns. Even if he is eventually able to leave the confines of the embassy, Assange said he fears he could continue to face serious risks for years to come. Although he said it seems unlikely he could be gunned down, he said he hasn't completely ruled out the possibility of being kidnapped by the CIA.

He added, “Unless I convert to Islam it's not that likely that I'll be droned, but we have seen things creeping towards that.” 

[...]
EXTRACT ONLY
FULL AT SOURCE
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Assange-Lives-in-Fear-of-Kidnapping-Assassination-20150829-0004.html

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

This story is prominent today.

Must be a lot of weirdos out there. 

I'd probably be more concerned about an abseiling swat-team grab on the balcony (and the likelihood of a CIA kidnapping down the track), than the random nutters making threats.



UPDATE

Not sure if this can be filed under 'whacko threat,' or if it's merely whacko.  

If it were directed at a woman journalist, woman developer, or woman politician, there'd most likely be media outrage, twitter take-downs, law enforcement authorities charging to the rescue, and politicians making the most of having a crack at pushing through restrictive new legislation (which I always find myself opposed to).  

August 2015  | here
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
As with most aggressive or questionable social media remarks, I'd say this posting is probably not a 'threat,' as such; and that it's most likely just an example of the rather unhinged mindsets there is among people.
Creeps me out a bit, though.



Assange - What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates - Book: The WikiLeaks Files | Article Extracts-Summary - Part II


EXTRACTS | SUMMARY
[For quotation purposes, confirm original article]

PART II

RE: Book

The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015)

----
SOURCE
Assange: What WikiLeaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates
By Julian Assange 8/28/15
http://www.newsweek.com/emb-midnight-827-assange-what-wikileaks-teaches-us-about-how-us-operates-366364

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

National Security Religiosity 
& the International Studies Association


large body of literature exists re:
structural or realpolitik analysis of key institutions of US power

such approaches alone, lack explanatory power, given:

range of ritualistic & even quasi-religious phenomena

surrounding the national security sector in USA

Rituals, familiar:
  • flag-folding
  • veneration of orders
  • elaborate genuflection to rank
[grovelling / servility / on bended knee | fm Lat. genu (knee) flectere (to bend) - here]
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

National Security Sector
|  Priestly Class
WikiLeaks published documents bear: classification markings

type of national-security 'holy seal'

Reaction to WikiLeaks publication of documents
= two parallel campaigns:
One
  • downplaying
  • diverting attention
  • reframing
Two
internal campaign (digestion / processing of event)
When documents bearing classification seal are made public

= documents transmuted by US DoS into forbidden objects

As 'forbidden objects'
  • public/published classified US DoS docs
= become 'toxic' to the 'state within a state'
Over 5.1 million Americans (as of 2014)
= US 'state within a state' - ie those with active security clearances

As 'forbidden objects'
published classified US DoS docs
= also 'toxic' to extended periphery who aspire to USG economic or social patronage

Upon WikiLeaks disclosures:

hysteria and non-corporeality {and unreality?}

religions & cults imbue their priestly class with additional scarcity value

  • by keeping their religious texts secret from the public or the lower orders of the devoted

technique also permits priestly class
to adopt different psychological strategies
for different levels of indoctrination

national security sector ways embraced by those who have become sufficiently indoctrinated
= laughable to:
  • public; or
  • lower levels of 'clearance;'

    What is laughable, hypocritical, or Machiavellian
    =   embraced by those sufficiently indoctrinated or co-opted
    by those whose economic or social advantage lies in accepting that which they would normally reject

    Profaned Object - 'Contamination'
    False USG Claim

    Publicly, USG claimed falsely:
    = that anyone without a USG security clearance distributing “classified” documents is violating the Espionage Act of 1917 (USA)

    USG FALSE claims
    = work in the opposite direction:
    "orders the very people it publicly claims are the only ones who can legally read classified documents to refrain from reading documents"
    ... lest they be 'contaminated' by them

    Exact documents:

    • may be read by cleared staff when
    • issued from classified USG repositories
    • are, however, forbidden to same staff when
    • exact documents emerge from a public source

    US DoS mandates that:
    cleared employees of the national security state are:
    • to self-report any public domain contact with the newly 'profaned' object; and 
    • to destroy all traces of it;

      US Irrational Response

      classified cables (+ other docs)
      published by WikiLeaks (& associated media)
      = completely identical to the original versions (ie they are electronic copies)

      By implication
      'Holy' US DoS classified docs 
        • acquire non-physical property / that is a 'magical' property 
        • and this 'holy,' 'magical' property received upon USG classification:
        is EXTINGUISHED by making document PUBLIC

          Devotees of National Security State
          • do not consider docs made public to be merely:
          • devoid of 'magical' property (bestowed by classification 'holy' seal); or 
          • rendered a mundane object on publication
          Devotees of National Security State
          consider documents made public
          as having become
          = inhabited by another non-physical property: an evil one
          Such religious thinking consequences:
          • excuse used by USG to block millions of people
          working for the 'state within a state' from reading:
          = over 30 different WikiLeaks domains
          = other outlets publishing WikiLeaks materials:
          • The New York Times
          • Guardian
          • Der Spiegel
          • Le Monde
          • El País
          2011 | USG Sent 'WikiLeaks Fatwa'
          to every:
          • federal govt agency
          • every federal govt employee
          • every federal govt security contractor
          Declaration of Official 'Enemy' - Proclaiming
          WikiLeaks disclosures
          caused damage to national security
          Declaration of 'Forbidden Object' - Proclaiming
          classified information
          'remains classified'
          irrespective of availability on public websites
          & availability via media disclosure
          Proclamation | 'Confession'
          contractors "shall report its existence immediately"
          Proclamation | 'Cleansing'
          Companies are:
          1. "to delete the offending material"
          2. & to clear even the "internet browser cache"
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          ACADEMIA
          INTERNATIONAL & PUBLIC RELATIONS

          Columbia University
          School of International & Public Affairs
          following US DoS contact
          warned students:
          “not post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites ..."
          Consequence invoked (leverage) that accompanied warning:
          "Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government."

          An array of govt depts & other entities, incl

          Library of Congress
          blocked internet access to WikiLeaks
          US National Archives
          = even blocked searches of its own database for “WikiLeaks”

          Pentagon prosecutors
          re Manning trial (alleged source Cablegate cables)
          = unable to receive important emails from judge & defence
          Rather than remove filter,
          Pentagon implemented clumsy new procedure:
          • check the filter daily for blocked WikiLeaks-related emails
          • set-up of alternate, special e-mail addresses for prosecution
          US National Security Sector Religious Hysteria
          = laughable to those outside the US national security sector

          US National Security Sector Religious Hysteria

          INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
          = serious poverty of analysis of WikiLeaks publications
          in US in international relations journals

          OTHER SCHOLARS
          scholars in disciplines
          eg law, linguistics, applied statistics, health & economics
          = not deterred

          eg - Entropy statistics journal
          DeDeo et al. (US or UK nationals)
          write that:
          WikiLeaks   |   Afghan War Diary 
          “is likely to become a standard set for both the analysis of human conflict and the study of empirical methods for the analysis of complex, multi-modal data.”
          [entropy = (Communications & Information) a measure of the efficiency of a system, such as a code or language, in transmitting information - fm. Gk - here]

          COURTS & INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
          • extensive use of WikiLeaks materials esp. cables
          • in courts, incl. domestic courts
          • from UK to Pakistan

          INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
          • extensive use of WikiLeaks materials

          from: European Court of Human Rights to International Criminal Tribunal


          CONTRAST POVERTY OF COVERAGE
          IN USA INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JOURNALS

          in light of 1,000s of citations in the courts & in other academic areas
          = poverty of coverage, not merely odd
          = suspicious

          Such international relations journals
          DOMINATE study of international relations GLOBALLY
          =  should be natural home for analysis of WikiLeaks 2-billion word diplomatic corpus

          US-based International Studies Quarterly (ISQ)

          major international relations journal
          = adopted a policy against accepting manuscripts based on WikiLeaks material
          *even where it consists of quotes*
          *or derived analysis*
          ISQ
          = acknowledged it's currently:
          in an untenable position until such time as there is a change in policy by International Studies Association (ISA)
          International Studies Association (ISA)
          = over 6,500 members worldwide
          = dominant scholarly association in the field
          = publishes:
          • Foreign Policy Analysis
          • International Political Sociology
          • International Interactions
          • International Studies Review
          • International Studies Perspectives
          ISA
          = almost HALF of 56 members on its governing council:  professors 'international service' type academic USA university departments 
          *Such university departments:
          = feeder schools for the US DoS and other internationally-oriented areas of govt

          ISA President (2014-15)
          = Prof Amitav Acharya
          School of International Service
          American University in Washington, DC
          ISA
          = banned single most significant US foreign policy archive from appearing in its academic papers
          = otherwise, presumably, against its institutional & academic ambitions
          ISA ban
          = calls into question its entire output
          = undermines an output that has influenced how the world understands role of US in international order

          Type of Academic Fraud

          = closing of ranks within the scholar class around the interests of Pentagon & DoS

          = exclusion of primary sources for non-academic reasons is to lie by omission

          = distortion of the field of international relations (& related disciplines)
          by proximity of its academic structures to the US govt

          = such close-proximity academic structures
          lack even even have the independence of the frequently deferential New York Times

          Distortion of Study of International Relations
          & Censorship of WikiLeaks

          = significant opportunity: to present an analysis of international relations free of censorship of classified materials

          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Other
          Fatwa
          =  "an Islamic religious ruling, a scholarly opinion on a matter of Islamic law. A fatwa is issued by a recognized religious authority in Islam."  |  here

          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          COMMENT
          Not sure what is meant by 'non-corporeality' ... some kind of disembodied hysteria?  lol

          Or, maybe something immaterial and therefore invalid?

          Not sure if I'm on the right track. 
          Going with unreality re 'non-corporeality' mentioned in article (as follows):
          "hysteria and non-corporeality"
          Article's a good read.





          Assange - What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates - Book: The WikiLeaks Files | Article Extracts-Summary - Part I


          EXTRACTS | SUMMARY
          [For quotation purposes, confirm original article]

          PART I

          RE: Book

          The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015)

          ----
          SOURCE
          Assange: What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates
          By Julian Assange 8/28/15
          http://www.newsweek.com/emb-midnight-827-assange-what-wikileaks-teaches-us-about-how-us-operates-366364

          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Leaked US docs
          lifted veil on
          imperialist nature
          of USA foreign policy
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Communication

          Early empires

          Stone
          • transmission of compressed institutional rules
          to be safely communicated
          • into future

          Early methods did not allow for:
          • rapidly unfolding events
          • official nuance or discretion
          gaps addressed by:
          • oral medium
          • other:
          • eg papyrus
          • light and fast to create, but fragile
          • easy to construct and transport, unifying occupied regions
          • = rapid information flow | could:
          • = feed reactive central management
          • = integrate incoming streams of intelligence
          • = swiftly project outgoing decisions
          {but with tendencies toward short-termism & micromanagement}
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          Absolute boundary to existence of empire:

          = ability to project an empire’s:
          • desires
          • structure
          • knowledge
          • across space
          • across time
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          Hallmark of empire

          = structured attempt at managing an extended
          • cultural; and
          • economic
          system
          • using communications
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
           USG DoS Empire Communications
          | Vulnerable to Dissection
          • records of these communications
          ( never intended to be dissected / especially vulnerable to dissection)
          • form the basis for understanding nature of world’s sole remaining “empire.”
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Anatomy of US Empire

          Where is it?
          • 191 countries
          • 276 fortified buildings
          • 169 embassies & other missions of USG
          • 71,000 people across those countries
          • 27 different US govt ('USG') agencies
          • 27 other USG departments ('depts') & agencies
          incl:
          • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
          • National Security Agency (NSA)
          • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
          • US military (various branches)
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          Embassy Components

          Ambassador
          = usually close to domestic US
          • political;
          • business; or
          • intelligence
          power
          Career Diplomats
          = specialize in
          • politics;
          • economy; and
          • public diplomacy [propaganda];
          of their host state.
          Others:
          • managers
          • researchers
          • military attachés
          • spies under foreign-service cover
          • personnel from other USG agencies
          • *some embassies:  may have
          • overt armed military; or 
          • covert special ops forces
          Caretakers | Services
          • contractors
          • security personnel
          • technicians
          • locally hired translators
          • cleaners
          • other service personnel
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          USG empire communication means:
          • radio
          • satellite
          • some communication USG mainland:
          • receive; or
          • disgorge
          diplomatic and CIA cables
          • some relay the communications of US military ships & planes
          • others = NSA mass-intercept of
          • mobile phones
          • other wireless traffic
          of host population
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          USG Diplomatic Service History

          • Dates back to the American Revolution  1765 - 1783 | here
          • Modern US DoS came into being: post WWII
          • 1973 - appointment of Henry Kissinger as secretary of state
          concurrent appointed of Henry Kissinger as: national security advisor
          facilitated tighter integration b/w following arms of USG:
          • foreign relations
          • military
          • intelligence
          • 1973 - cables transmitted in bulk, electronically *for first time*

          US Department of State ('DoS')
          UNIQUE - Among USA Bureaucracies

          Other USG agencies
          = one function admin

          US DoS
          = represents / houses
          = all major elements of US national power
          • = cover for CIA
          • = buildings for NSA mass-interception equipment
          • = office space & communications facilities for:
          • FBI
          • military
          • other USG agencies & staff
          • to act as sales agents & political advisors for largest US corporations
             
            ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Understanding US DoS

          diplomatic apparatus
          cannot properly understood from outside
          • US DoS
          • = directly involved in putting a friendly face on empire
          • = ie concealing US DoS underlying mechanics
          • 'public diplomacy'
          = outward propaganda
          • $1 billion p.a. is budgeted by USA
          for outward propaganda ('public diplomacy')
          • USG DoS propaganda ('public diplomacy')
          aims to influence:
          1) journalists; and
          2) civil society;
          so that they serve as *conduits* for US DoS messaging
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          USG DoS | Released Info | National Archives

          national archives = impressive collections of internal state communications
          BUT - material intentionally withheld
          (or made difficult to access) for DECADES

          aim: to strip info of potency

          reason: potential 'blowback'
          ie.  timely, accessible archives of international significance
          *would produce 'blowback' in the form of:
          • withdrawn funding; or
          • termination of officials
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          Potency of Secret Communications Revealed
          | The Naked Empire

          publication
          • = vivisection of a living empire
          • = (showing what substance flowed from which state organ & when)
          • = internal communications by-product of activities of US DoS
          • = not produced in order to manipulate public
          • = cables aimed at elements of rest of US state apparatus
          • = therefore relatively free from distorting influence of public relations
          • = reading US DoS cables (internal communications, stripped of propaganda / external influence intent) | 
          • = much more effective way of understanding an institution like US DoS than reading reports by journalist (fed to them by likes of Hillary Clinton & Jen Psaki)
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          Note however:

          cables / internal communications 
          of US DoS officials
          = must match their pens to the latest DC orthodoxies

          = elements of political correctness

          = noteworthy & visible to outsiders who are not sufficiently indoctrinated

          Cables show how US DoS (& agencies that inter-operate with cable system)
          = understand their place in the world


          KEY to understanding:

          Only by approaching this corpus holistically (above localised atrocity & individual abuses):
          does the true human cost of empire heave into view
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
          COMMENT
          Above extracts/summary are my way of distilling what is key (to me).  Best to read the article itself, in case there's gaps in my understanding.
          Following not clear to me:

          serve as *conduits* for US DoS messaging

          Is that the journalists & members of civil society to serve as conduits of US DoS messaging, as result of US DoS 'public diplomacy' propaganda?  That's what I assumed.



          Assange: 'What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates' | Newsweek

          SOURCE
          http://www.newsweek.com/emb-midnight-827-assange-what-wikileaks-teaches-us-about-how-us-operates-366364
          OPINION

          Assange: What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the U.S. Operates
          By Julian Assange 8/28/15 at 2:45 AM
          In an introduction to a new book, The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015), Wikileaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange explains how the leaked U.S. documents have lifted the veil on the imperialist nature of American foreign policy.

          One day, a monk and two novices found a heavy stone in their path. “We will throw it away,” said the novices. But before they could do so, the monk took his ax and cleaved the stone in half. After seeking his approval, the novices then threw the halves away.

          “Why did you cleave the stone only to have us throw it away?” they asked. The monk pointed to the distance the half stones had traveled. Growing excited, one of the novices took the monk’s ax and rushed to where one half of the stone had landed. Cleaving it, he threw the quarter, whereupon the other novice grabbed the ax from him and rushed after it. He too cleaved the stone fragment and threw it afield.

          Speech has a short temporal range, but stone has a long one. Some writing methods, such as engraving into stone, suited the transmission of compressed institutional rules that needed to be safely communicated into future months and years. But these methods did not allow for rapidly unfolding events, or for official nuance or discretion: they were set in stone.

          To address the gaps, empires with slow writing systems still had to rely heavily on humanity’s oldest and yet most ephemeral communications medium: oral conventions, speech.

          Other methods, such as papyrus, were light and fast to create, but fragile. Such communications materials had the advantage of being easy to construct and transport, unifying occupied regions through rapid information flow that in turn could feed a reactive central management. Such a well connected center could integrate the streams of intelligence coming in and swiftly project its resulting decisions outwards, albeit with resulting tendencies toward short-termism and micromanagement.

          While a sea, desert, or mountain could be crossed or bypassed at some expense, and energy resources discovered or stolen, the ability to project an empire’s desires, structure and knowledge across space and time forms an absolute boundary to its existence.

          Cultures and economies communicate using all manner of techniques across the regions and years of their existence, from the evolution of jokes shared virally between friends to the diffusion of prices across trade routes.

          This does not by itself make an empire. The structured attempt at managing an extended cultural and economic system using communications is the hallmark of empire. And it is the records of these communications, never intended to be dissected, and so especially vulnerable to dissection, that form the basis for understanding the nature of the world’s sole remaining “empire.”

          Anatomy of the U.S. Empire

          And where is this empire?

          Each working day, 71,000 people across 191 countries representing twenty-seven [27] different US government agencies wake and make their way past flags, steel fences and armed guards into one of the 276 fortified buildings that comprise the 169 embassies and other missions of the US Department of State.

          They are joined in their march by representatives and operatives from twenty-seven [27] other US government departments and agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the various branches of the US military.

          Inside each embassy is an ambassador who is usually close to domestic US political, business or intelligence power; career diplomats who specialize in the politics, economy and public diplomacy of their host state; managers, researchers, military attachés, spies under foreign-service cover, personnel from other US government agencies (for some embassies this goes as far as overt armed military or covert special operations forces); contractors, security personnel, technicians, locally hired translators, cleaners and other service personnel.

          Above them, radio and satellite antennas scrape the air, some reaching back home to receive or disgorge diplomatic and CIA cables, some to relay the communications of US military ships and planes, others emplaced by the National Security Agency in order to mass-intercept the mobile phones and other wireless traffic of the host population.

          The US diplomatic service dates back to the Revolution, but it was in the post–World War II environment that the modern State Department came to be.

          Its origins coincided with the appointment of Henry Kissinger as secretary of state, in 1973. Kissinger’s appointment was unusual in several respects. Kissinger did not just head up the State Department; he was also concurrently appointed national security advisor, facilitating a tighter integration between the foreign relations and military and intelligence arms of the US government.
          While the State Department had long had a cable system, the appointment of Kissinger led to logistical changes in how cables were written, indexed and stored. For the first time, the bulk of cables were transmitted electronically. This period of major innovation is still present in the way the department operates today.

          The US Department of State is unique among the formal bureaucracies of the United States. Other agencies aspire to administrate one function or another, but the State Department represents, and even houses, all major elements of US national power. It provides cover for the CIA, buildings for the NSA mass-interception equipment, office space and communications facilities for the FBI, the military and other government agencies and staff to act as sales agents and political advisors for the largest US corporations.

          One cannot properly understand an institution like the State Department from the outside, any more than Renaissance artists could discover how animals worked without opening them up and poking about inside. As the diplomatic apparatus of the United States, the State Department is directly involved in putting a friendly face on empire, concealing its underlying mechanics.

          Every year, more than $1 billion is budgeted for “public diplomacy,” a circumlocutory term for outward-facing propaganda. Public diplomacy explicitly aims to influence journalists and civil society, so that they serve as conduits for State Department messaging.

          While national archives have produced impressive collections of internal state communications, their material is intentionally withheld or made difficult to access for decades, until it is stripped of potency. This is inevitable, as national archives are not structured to resist the blowback (in the form of withdrawn funding or termination of officials) that timely, accessible archives of international significance would produce.

          What makes the revelation of secret communications potent is that we were not supposed to read them. The internal communications of the US Department of State are the logistical by-product of its activities: their publication is the vivisection of a living empire, showing what substance flowed from which state organ and when.

          Diplomatic cables are not produced in order to manipulate the public, but are aimed at elements of the rest of the US state apparatus and are therefore relatively free from the distorting influence of public relations. Reading them is a much more effective way of understanding an institution like the State Department than reading reports by journalists on the public pronouncements of Hillary Clinton, or [White House Communications Director] Jen Psaki.

          While in their internal communications State Department officials must match their pens to the latest DC orthodoxies should they wish to stand out in Washington for the “right” reasons and not the “wrong” ones, these elements of political correctness are themselves noteworthy and visible to outsiders who are not sufficiently indoctrinated.

          Many cables are deliberative or logistical, and their causal relationships across time and space with other cables and with externally documented events create a web of interpretive constraints that reliably show how the US Department of State and the agencies that inter-operate with its cable system understand their place in the world.

          Only by approaching this corpus holistically—over and above the documentation of each individual abuse, each localized atrocitydoes the true human cost of empire heave into view.

          National Security Religiosity and the International Studies Association

          While there exists a large literature in the structural or realpolitik analysis of key institutions of US power, a range of ritualistic and even quasi-religious phenomena surrounding the national security sector in the United States suggests that these approaches alone lack explanatory power.

          These phenomena are familiar in the ritual of flag-folding, the veneration of orders and elaborate genuflection [grovelling / servility / on bended knee | fm Lat. genu (knee) flectere (to bend) - here] to rank, but they can be seen also in the extraordinary reaction to WikiLeaks’ disclosures, where it is possible to observe some of their more interesting features. 

          When WikiLeaks publishes US government documents with classification markings—a type of national-security “holy seal,” if you will—two parallel campaigns begin: first, the public campaign of downplaying, diverting attention from and reframing any revelations that are a threat to the prestige of the national security class; and, second, an internal campaign within the national security state itself to digest what has happened.

          When documents carrying such seals are made public, they are transubstantiated [transmuted] into forbidden objects that become toxic to the “state within a state”—the more than 5.1 million Americans (as of 2014) with active security clearances, and those on its extended periphery who aspire to its economic or social patronage.

          There is a level of hysteria and non-corporeality  [immateriality?] exhibited in this reaction to WikiLeaks’ disclosures that is not easily captured by traditional theories of power. Many religions and cults imbue their priestly class with additional scarcity value by keeping their religious texts secret from the public or the lower orders of the devoted. This technique also permits the priestly class to adopt different psychological strategies for different levels of indoctrination.
          What is laughable, hypocritical, or Machiavellian to the public or lower levels of “clearance” is embraced by those who have become sufficiently indoctrinated or co-opted into feeling that their economic or social advantage lies in accepting that which they would normally reject.

          Publicly, the US government has claimed, falsely, that anyone without a security clearance distributing “classified” documents is violating the Espionage Act of 1917. But the claims of the interior “state within a state” campaign work in the opposite direction. There, it orders the very people it publicly claims are the only ones who can legally read classified documents to refrain from reading documents WikiLeaks and associated media have published with classification markings on them, lest they be “contaminated” by them. 
          While a given document can be read by cleared staff when it issues from classified government repositories, it is forbidden for the same staff to set eyes on the exact same document when it emerges from a public source. Should cleared employees of the national security state read such documents in the public domain, they are expected to self-report their contact with the newly profaned object, and destroy all traces of it. 

          This response is, of course, irrational. The classified cables and other documents published by WikiLeaks and associated media are completely identical to the original versions officially available to those with the necessary security clearance, since this is where they originated. They are electronic copies.

          Not only are they indistinguishable—there is literally no difference at all between them. Not a word. Not a letter. Not a single bit.

          The implication is that there is a non-physical property that inhabits documents once they receive their classification markings, and that this magical property is extinguished not by copying the document but by making the copy public. The now public document has, to devotees of the national security state, not merely become devoid of this magical property and reverted to a mundane object, it has been inhabited by another non-physical property:  an evil one.

          This kind of religious thinking has consequences. Not only is it the excuse used by the US government to block millions of people working for the “state within a state” from reading more than thirty [30] different WikiLeaks domains—the same excuse that was used to block The New York Times, Guardian, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, El País and other outlets publishing WikiLeaks materials.

          In fact, in 2011 the US government sent what might be called a “WikiLeaks fatwa” to every federal government agency, every federal government employee, and every federal government security contractor:
          The recent disclosure of US Government documents by WikiLeaks has caused damage to our national security ... Classified information, whether or not already posted on public websites, disclosed to the media, or otherwise in the public domain remains classified and must be treated as such until such time it is declassified by an appropriate US government authority ...

          Contractors who inadvertently discover potentially classified information in the public domain shall report its existence immediately to their Facility Security Officers. Companies are instructed to delete the offending material by holding down the SHIFT key while pressing the DELETE key for Windows-based systems and clearing of the internet browser cache.
          After being contacted by an officer of the US Department of State, Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs warned its students to “not post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter. Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government.” 

          A swathe of government departments and other entities, including even the Library of Congress, blocked internet access to WikiLeaks. The US National Archives even blocked searches of its own database for the phrase “WikiLeaks.”

          So absurd did the taboo become that, like a dog snapping mindlessly at everything, eventually it found its mark—its own tail. By March 2012, the Pentagon had gone so far as to create an automatic filter to block any emails, including inbound emails to the Pentagon, containing the word “WikiLeaks.”

          As a result, Pentagon prosecutors preparing the case against US intelligence analyst PFC Manning, the alleged source of the Cablegate cables, found that they were not receiving important emails from either the judge or the defense.

          But the Pentagon did not remove the filter— instead, chief prosecutor Major Ashden Fein told the court that a new procedure had been introduced to check the filter daily for blocked WikiLeaks-related emails. Military judge Col. Denise Lind said that special alternative email addresses would be set up for the prosecution.

          While such religious hysteria seems laughable to those outside the US national security sector, it has resulted in a serious poverty of analysis of WikiLeaks publications in American international relations journals. However, scholars in disciplines as varied as law, linguistics, applied statistics, health and economics have not been so shy.
          For instance, in their 2013 paper for the statistics journal Entropy, DeDeo et al.—all US or UK nationals—write that WikiLeaks’ Afghan War Diary “is likely to become a standard set for both the analysis of human conflict and the study of empirical methods for the analysis of complex, multi-modal data.”
          [entropy = (Communications & Information) a measure of the efficiency of a system, such as a code or language, in transmitting information - fm. Gk  - here]
          There is even an extensive use of WikiLeaks materials, particularly cables, in courts, including domestic courts, from the United Kingdom to Pakistan, and in international tribunals from the European Court of Human Rights to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.

          Set against the thousands of citations in the courts and in other academic areas, the poverty of coverage in American international relations journals appears not merely odd, but suspicious. These journals, which dominate the study of international relations globally, should be a natural home for the proper analysis of WikiLeaks’ two-billion-word diplomatic corpus.

          The US-based International Studies Quarterly (ISQ), a major international relations journal, adopted a policy against accepting manuscripts based on WikiLeaks materialeven where it consists of quotes or derived analysis. According to a forthcoming paper, “Who’s Afraid of WikiLeaks? Missed Opportunities in Political Science Research,” the editor of ISQ stated that the journal is currently “in an untenable position,” and that this will remain the case until there is a change in policy from the influential International Studies Association (ISA).

          The ISA has over 6,500 members worldwide and is the dominant scholarly association in the field. The ISA also publishes Foreign Policy Analysis, International Political Sociology, International Interactions, International Studies Review, and International Studies Perspectives.

          The ISA’s 2014–15 president is Amitav Acharya, a professor at the School of International Service at the American University in Washington, DC. Nearly half of the fifty-six [56] members on its governing council are professors at similar academic departments across the United States, many of which also operate as feeder schools for the US Department of State and other internationally-oriented areas of government.

          That the ISA has banned the single most significant US foreign policy archive from appearing in its academic papers—something that must otherwise work against its institutional and academic ambitionscalls into question its entire output, an output that has significantly influenced how the world has come to understand the role of the United States in the international order.

          This closing of ranks within the scholar class around the interests of the Pentagon and the State Department is, in itself, worthy of analysis. The censorship of cables from international relations journals is a type of academic fraud. To quietly exclude primary sources for non-academic reasons is to lie by omission.

          But it points to a larger insight: the distortion of the field of international relations and related disciplines by the proximity of its academic structures to the US government. Its structures do not even have the independence of the frequently deferent New York Times, which, while it engaged in various forms of cable censorship, at least managed to publish over a hundred.

          These journals’ distortion of the study of international relations and censorship of WikiLeaks are clear examples of a problem. But its identification also presents a significant opportunity: to present an analysis of international relations that has not been hobbled by the censorship of classified materials.

          The World According to U.S. Empire

          The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015) begins to address the need for scholarly analysis of what the millions of documents published by WikiLeaks say about international geopolitics. The chapters use a constellation approach to these documents to reveal how the United States deals with various regional and international power dynamics.

          It is impossible to cover the wealth of material or relationships in this first volume, but I hope that this work will stimulate long-form journalists and academics to eclipse it.

          Chapter 1 reflects on America’s status as an “empire,” and considers what this means, seeking to characterize US economic, military, administrative and diplomatic power with reference to the long sweep of global history over the last century.

          The chapter establishes the “imperialism of free trade” framework that the rest of Part II then develops—a framework wherein American military might is used not for territorial expansion but to perpetuate American economic preeminence. Both themes are considered in more detail in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3. Chapter 1 also situates WikiLeaks in the context of an unprecedented growth in American official secrecy, and the evolution of US power following the commencement of the “war on terror.

          Chapter 2 examines the WikiLeaks materials on the so-called “war on terror.” Besides providing a keen summary of the war crimes and human rights abuses documented in WikiLeaks publications, along with a detailed historical overview of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq and the consequent unfolding disaster there, the chapter also draws conclusions about the ideological and conceptual substructure of America’s “war on terror,” and investigates how an aspect of the imperial prerogative of the United States is to exercise decisive power to ensure that terms like “just war,” “torture,” “terrorism” and “civilian” are defined in its own favor.

          The argument adduces evidence from the full range of WikiLeaks publications, along with other sources, such as the recent CIA torture report. In the process, the chapter also examines the double standards and problems arising from the misuse of these concepts (including the attempt to delegitimize and marginalize WikiLeaks itself).

          Chapter 3 embarks on a thoroughgoing discussion of the empire of free trade—the relationship of the American form of empire with the worldwide promotion of neoliberal economic reform, providing American corporations with access to “global markets.”

          The chapter draws on State Department cables published by WikiLeaks, as well as WikiLeaks publications dating back to 2007 concerning the “private sector,” including material on banks and global multilateral treaty negotiations. The chapter provides luminous examples of how the drive toward economic integration buttresses the position of the United States as an arms-length empire, and provides the underlying rationale for the patterns of intervention, military or otherwise, pursued in Latin America and beyond.

          Chapter 4 is a do-it-yourself guide on how to use Wiki- Leaks’ Public Library of US Diplomacy (PlusD), written by investigations editor Sarah Harrison. At the time of writing, PlusD contains 2,325,961 cables and other diplomatic records. The State Department uses its own logic to create, transmit and index these records, the totality of which form its primary institutional memory.

          Harrison explains how to get started searching, reading and interpreting cable metadata and content, from the infamous CHEROKEE restriction to the use of State Department euphemisms such as “opposing resource nationalism.”

          The history of US policy regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC) is a rich case study in the use of diplomacy in a concerted effort to undermine an international institution.

          In Chapter 5, Linda Pearson documents what the cables reveal about the efforts of successive US administrations to limit the ICC’s jurisdiction. These include the use of both bribes and threats by the George W. Bush administration to corral states signed up to the ICC into providing immunity from war crimes prosecutions for US persons—and, under the Obama administration, more subtle efforts to shape the ICC into an adjunct of US foreign policy.

          Japan and South Korea have been epicenters of US influence within East Asia for decades. The cables document nearly a decade of US efforts to affect domestic political outcomes within these two countries in line with its own long-term interests.

          In Chapter 14, investigative journalist Tim Shorrock examines the geopolitical triangle created by US relations with both countries, including its attempts to play one off against the other, as part of long-term efforts to undermine left-wing governments and policies within the region.

          Of global GDP growth over the last decade, over 50 percent has been in Southeast Asia. This understanding has led to an explicit reassignment of military, diplomatic and surveillance assets to Southeast Asia, epitomized by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a strategy of “forward deployed diplomacy.” In Chapter 15, Richard Heydarian examines the cables on Southeast Asia and situates his findings within a broader historical critique of US influence in the region.

          The critique of Western imperialism is most contentious in regions of the world that have historically been US protectorates, such as western Europe. So indoctrinated are European liberals in modern imperialist ideology that even the idea that the United States might be administering a global empire is routinely dismissed with references to concepts like “right to protect,” demonstrating a willful deafness not only to the structure of US power around the world, but also to how it increasingly talks about itself as an “empire.”

          In Chapter 6, Michael Busch examines the broad patterns of influence and subversion pursued by the global superpower on the political systems of Europe and its member states. Themes include European government collusion with the CIA’s rendition and torture programs, the subversion of European criminal justice and judicial systems to rescue alleged US government torturers from prosecution and the use of US diplomacy to open up European markets to US aerospace companies, or to invasive, monopolistic technologies and patents, such as Monsanto’s genetically modified organisms.

          In Chapter 13, Phyllis Bennis opts for a broad overview of WikiLeaks’ publications on Afghanistan—including not just the State Department cables, but also the Significant Action Reports (SIGACTs) published by WikiLeaks as the Afghan War Diary, and Congressional Research Reports and other documents on Afghanistan published by WikiLeaks prior to 2010.

          What emerges is a stark assessment of the folly of US military involvement in Afghanistan since 2001 and its cost in terms of human life and societal well-being.

          Geopolitics is complicated, and all the more so in relation to a country like Israel. Israel’s military dominance in the Middle East; its diplomatic relations with other regional players such as Egypt, Syria, Iran, Lebanon and Turkey; its role as an avatar for US imperial policy within the area; its wayward exploitation of its protected status in pursuing its own genocidal policies toward the Palestinian people—all of these themes are brought to the fore in Chapter 9, by Peter Certo and Stephen Zunes, which carefully interrogates the relevant State Department cables.

          In Chapter 11, on Iran, Gareth Porter provides an excellent companion to the chapter on Israel, choosing to focus on what the cables reveal about the tripartite geopolitical standoff between the US, Israel and Iran, and the shadow this structure casts on the rest of the Middle East.

          In particular, Porter focuses on the P5+1 talks about Iran’s nuclear enrichment program, on US efforts to misrepresent intelligence in order to tip the international consensus against Iran, and on the role of Israel as both a catalyst for and an agent of US policy in the Middle East.

          The conflict in Iraq is the focus of Chapter 12, by journalist Dahr Jamail, which draws on a wide range of WikiLeaks materials to argue that the United States had a deliberate policy of exacerbating sectarian divisions in Iraq following its invasion and occupation, in the belief that the country would be easier to dominate in such circumstances.

          The consequent devastation is documented in painstaking detail using WikiLeaks materials, including US cables, Congressional Research Reports dating between 2005 and 2008 and the Iraq War Logs from 2010.

          Jamail pays specific attention to the “Sahwa” movement— the US-sponsored program of counter-insurgency that was implemented to respond to the growing influence of al-Qaeda affiliates among Sunni Iraqis disaffected by the Shia-dominated US-client government of Nouri al-Maliki.

          The United States paid large numbers of Iraqis to defect from the Sunni insurgency and instead fight against al-Qaeda, on the promise of receiving regular employment through integration into the Iraqi military. As Jamail argues, the failure of the Maliki government to honor this promise saw huge numbers of US-trained, US-armed and US-financed—but now unemployed—Sunni militants return to the insurgency, eventually swelling the ranks of the former al- Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, which in 2014 became known as ISIS, or the “Islamic State.”

          Across Iraq’s northeastern border, in Syria, the cables also describe how the scene was set for the emergence of ISIS. Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, warmongers in the media have demanded the Western military pounding of Syria to depose Bashar Al-Assad—presented, in typical liberal-interventionist fashion, as a “new Hitler.”

          The emergence of the Islamic State, to which the Assad government is the only viable counterweight within Syria, has thrown this propagandistic consensus into disarray. But US government designs on Syrian regime change, and its devotion to regional instability, long pre-date the Syrian civil war, as is demonstrated in the cables.

          Chapter 10, by Robert Naiman, offers a careful reading of the Damascus cables, pointing out important historical presentiments of the current situation in Syria, and unpicking the benign-sounding human rights constructions of US diplomats to bring into focus the imperialist inflection of US foreign policy and rhetoric toward Syria—including concrete efforts within the country to undermine the government and bring about the chaos of recent months during the entire decade preceding 2011.

          Clichés abound about Turkey being a “bridge between East and West,” but it cannot be denied that this country of some seventy-five million people occupies an important position— both as a regional player within Middle Eastern geopolitics and as a large and economically powerful nominal democracy on the fringes of Europe.

          As Conn Hallinan argues in Chapter 8, State Department cables illustrate US efforts to exploit the rich geopolitical significance of Turkey. Hallinan uses the cables as a pretext to provide a tour of Turkey’s regional alliances, strategic concerns and internal affairs. Among the topics he covers are the complex strategic energy calculations that necessitate Turkey’s delicate relations with Iran and Russia, even as it cultivates the United States, Europe and Israel in its efforts to gain access to Western markets.

          The chapter also examines Turkey’s bargaining power, demonstrated in its use of a veto against the election of former Danish prime minister Anders Rasmussen as the head of NATO, in order to force the United States to pressure the Danish government into suppressing a Denmark-based Kurdish television channel.

          The essay also deals with Turkey’s internal issues, such as government policy toward Kurdish separatist groups, and the extraordinary underground political conflict and intrigue between Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the expatriate political figure Fethullah Gülen.

          Since the end of the Cold War, and especially during the so-called “war on terror,” US diplomacy has leaned toward South, Central and East Asia. Except in the case of one or two flare-ups, US-Russian relations receded from the popular consciousness as the main geopolitical dynamic.

          This of course has changed as a result of the conflict in the Ukraine. But popular consciousness is not reality. As Russ Wellen shows in Chapter 7, in the decade following the century’s turn the US has pursued a policy of aggressive NATO expansion, challenging Russia’s regional hegemony within Eastern Europe and the former Soviet area and seeking to subvert nuclear treaties to maintain its strategic advantage.

          As the cables show, these efforts have not gone unnoticed by Russia, and are recurring points of conflict in US-Russian diplomatic relations, even during the most cordial of periods. The chapter provides the necessary context for recent East-West tensions centering around Syria, Ukraine and the granting of asylum to Edward Snowden, and yields critical insight into a geopolitical relationship that, if mishandled, threatens the survival of our civilization and even of our species.

          Perhaps no region of the world demonstrates the full spectrum of US imperial interference as vividly as Latin America. Since the 1950s, US policy in Central and South America has popularized the concept of the CIA coup d’état, deposing democratically elected left-wing governments and installing US-friendly right-wing dictatorships; inaugurating legacies of brutal civil war, death squads, torture and disappearances; and immiserating [impoverishing] millions to the benefit of the American ruling class.

          As Alexander Main, Jake Johnston, and Dan Beeton note in the first of their chapters on Latin America, Chapter 17, the English-speaking press saw no evil in the State Department cables, concluding that they did not fit “the stereotype of America plotting coups and caring only about business interests and consorting with only the right wing.”

          The exact opposite is true: the cables demonstrate a smooth continuity between the brutal US policy in Latin America during the Cold War and the more sophisticated plays at toppling governments that have taken place in recent years.

          Chapter 17 offers a broad overview of the use of USAID and “civil society” astroturfing, as well as other, more direct methods of pursuing “regime change” in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador and Haiti.

          Chapter 18, by the same authors, focuses on Venezuela, the socialist enemy of the day, and specifically on US efforts to undermine the country as a regional left-wing bulwark in the wake of the failed US-backed coup against the Chávez government in 2002.

          The response of the United States to the release of the WikiLeaks materials betrays a belief that its power resides in a disparity of information: ever more knowledge for the empire, ever less for its subjects.

          In 1969, Daniel Ellsberg—later famous for leaking the Pentagon Papers—had a top-secret security clearance. Henry Kissinger had applied for his own top-secret clearance. Ellsberg warned him of its dangers:
          [I]t will ... become very hard for you to learn from anybody who doesn’t have these clearances. Because you’ll be thinking as you listen to them: “What would this man be telling me if he knew what I know? Would he be giving me the same advice, or would it totally change his predictions and recommendations?” You will deal with a person who doesn’t have those clearances only from the point of view of what you want him to believe and what impression you want him to go away with, since you’ll have to lie carefully to him about what you know. In effect, you will have to manipulate him. You’ll give up trying to assess what he has to say. The danger is, you’ll become something like a moron. You’ll become incapable of learning from most people in the world, no matter how much experience they may have in their particular areas that may be much greater than yours.
          Freed from their classified seals, the WikiLeaks materials bridge the gulf between the “morons” with security clearances and nothing to learn, and us, their readers.

          Julian Assange is the editor-in-chief of Wikileaks. This is extracted from The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to U.S. Empire (Verso, 2015)
          SOURCE
          http://www.newsweek.com/emb-midnight-827-assange-what-wikileaks-teaches-us-about-how-us-operates-366364
          Summaries 
          Assange |
          What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates
          | Book: The WikiLeaks Files | Article Extracts-Summary
          Part I  | here

          Assange |
          What Wikileaks Teaches Us About How the US Operates
          | Book: The WikiLeaks Files | Article Extracts-Summary 
          Part II  |  here
          ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

          COMMENT

          Might have to read this again, because I was listening to music while highlighting the parts that seem key (to me).

          Book sounds really good.