Still largely following what's going on in Ukraine. I don't have that kind of courage, so I'm in awe of how brave and chilled out the Novorossiya guys are, facing a barrage of bullets and shells aimed at destroying them -- as well as some really disgusting and dishonourable elements in the government camp. Find myself identifying with the independence fighters in a big way. But however much I feel a sense of solidarity, I'm not there: it's not me exposed to being shelled; it's not me ducking bullets; it's not me picking up body parts and flesh of people who have been ripped apart; it's not me piling mangled, bleeding bodies of the dead into the back of a van -- and it's not me facing death or facing life in towns that have been completely devastated structurally and socially. |
TOKYO MASTER BANNER
MINISTRY OF TOKYO
|
August 31, 2014
Novorossiya
August 28, 2014
UKRAIN - NATO - ANDERS FOGH-RASMUSSEN - LEHMANN ARTICLE
24.08.2014 Author: Christof Lehmann
NATO’s Summit in Wales: Why Anders Fogh-Rasmussen?
Anders Fogh-Rasmussen spoke to journalists in Denmark on August 15 and stressed that the Alliance would focus on its readiness to deal with the full range of threats and with NATO’s readiness. He said ”we will adopt a Readiness Action Plan to make ourselves faster and more agile”. He added that NATO leaders planned to strengthen NATO’s partners and their institutions. Fogh-Rasmussen underlined that the success of NATO would depend on all Allies investing adequately in security and defense, especially given by the new security climate created by Russia’s illegal actions in Ukraine. This interpretation of NATO’s role in Libya stands in stark contrast, to how it was perceived by the then Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Russia, and many other UN member states. During a joint press conference with the then Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen in Copenhagen, Putin stressed that NATO had overstepped its authorization via UN Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya. The atmosphere between Putin and Lars Løkke Rasmussen was visibly tense. Adding to the tensions was probably, that Putin has a KGB background and must have known that Lars Løkke Rasmussen raised millions for the ”mujahedeen” and other US/NATO creations in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Another one who would probably say ”not so fast” to NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s statement about NATO premium insurance policy is the Russian Ambassador to NATO, Vitaly Grutchko. After the collapse of Russia – EU negotiations over the Third EU Energy Package, at a meeting in Brussels in 2013, Grutchko said The appointment of a NATO Secretary-General helps forecast NATO long-term planning. One example? In 1987 NATO appointed the former German Defense Minister Manfred Wörner. The appointment of Wörner was followed by the German reunification in 1990. On December 26, 1991, the Soviet Union was dissolved. Wörner, Germany, and inner-German, German – Czechoslovakian and especially German-Russian relations were crucial elements to these developments. Wörner died from intestinal cancer at the age of 59 in 1994. Wörner was known to be skeptic with regards to NATO’s eastward expansion. Denmark and Fogh-Rasmussen should come to play crucial roles in tying the former Soviet Republics in the Baltic, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania to the European Union and to NATO. Anders Fogh-Rasmussen served as Danish PM between November 27, 2001 and April 5, 2009. Centuries of close ties between the Baltic States and Denmark were crucial. In the post 9/11 climate and the Global War on Terror, Fogh-Rasmussen had come to prove that he was willing to engage Danish troops in an illegal war in Iraq. Moreover, the Danish courts rejected Danish plaintiffs who wanted Fogh-Rasmussen charged on these grounds, saying that they had no standing in court. Because it’s so great to be on the winning team. Danish loyalty towards NATO was relatively easy to forecast, also for historical reasons. Danes are all to aware of the fact that Denmark got ”a free ride” when Germany was defeated in WWII. Historical archives show that the then Danish Foreign Minister Peter Munch had a secret meeting with the German Reichführer ( Leader of the Realm) Heinrich Himmler in Rostock. The meeting took place in the weeks before the ”German invasion”. Munch’s son was known to be pedophile and the young man could risk jail or worse if he fell into the hands of a German prosecutor. Records which could have proven that Munch was blackmailed have in part be burned, others remain classified to this day. Danish forces mounted only symbolic resistance when German troops initiated operation “Weserübung” and occupied Denmark and Norway to “secure their neutrality”. The appointment of Fogh-Rasmussen was a clear signal for NATO’s eastwards expansion, in breach with the terms agreed upon before the German reunification. That is, no NATO troops in any of the former Soviet republics or Warsaw Treaty member states. The summit in Wales: Rockefeller money vs. continental European consensus – War or Peace? The 2014 NATO summit in Wales will be held against the backdrop of an unprecedented risk for open war between NATO and Russia or the CSTO. Fogh-Rasmussen stressed that the insurance premium has gone up. He omits that core NATO members, especially the USA, UK, with almost absolute loyalty from Denmark, manufactured the wars in Libya and Syria since 2007; the war in Iraq since 2000 or before, and the war in Ukraine since 2012. Denmark and Anders Fogh-Rasmussen were the perfect choice ”because it’s so great to be on the winning team”. Fogh-Rasmussen’s term as NATO Secretary-General and the current conflict in Ukraine combined, raise principle questions: Who benefits from almost pathologically obsessive, Rockefeller-money-supported policy-makers like Zbigniev Brzezinski. In his latest book “Strategic Vision”, the Obama administration adviser argues that the Russia of Putin must be contained and isolated, that Turkey shall play a crucial role for NATO in the Middle East. Psychologically trained observers would assure that Brzezinski is obsessed with dividing Russia into independent republics and then to tie Moscow to a continental Europe under US/UK hegemony. [So it's a US/UK empire ... Europe a province?] Who benefits from throwing a spanner into Russian – continental European relations and the provocation of a third, great European war over an subversively-created lack of convergence in EU – Russian energy-security requirements?
source: Journal-Neo.Org |
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI - US geostrategist - wikipedia link.
*A wealth of information in this article by Dr Christof Lehmann.
August 27, 2014
LUGANSK (UKR) - LUGANSK PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC (LNR)
Self-proclaimed Lugansk People's Republic elects head, passes constitution
Published time: May 19, 2014 03:56
|
*Not sure if any changes to personnel since.
So there you go: in referendum re self-rule overwhelming majority supported independence from Kiev.
MINSK - CUSTOMS UNION TALKS - Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan with Ukraine & EU
|
Don't know what to think.
Talks are ongoing.
Poroshenko's 'peace plan' isn't a peace plan.
But there is a trilateral settlement of Ukraine discussion about to take place, so something interesting could come out of that.
Didn't get the energy / gas at border to third parties stuff.
Contract is in force until 2019 & Russian's aren't 'renewing' it - which presumably also means they're not amending it in any way. So contract stands?
Bit lost on that one. Bit frazzled today & not focused enough to think. LOL
TWITTER Lobbying
Tend to do things on the fly rather than after careful consideration and extensive research, so my attempt at the odd bit of Twitter campaigning is rather lame to say the least! |
Summary
A FEW TWEETS ... of what caught my attention
.......................................................................................
Iraq, in my opinion, is about crude oil first and foremost. Correction. *Only* about crude oil. I firmly believe that. When the penny dropped I felt as if I'd discovered oil. It was visceral. Things might hot up in Iraq, as there's a new appointment and he's had Iraq and other operations experience and a long career. Didn't check his predecessor's experience, so not sure. Really ought to expand on that and on the 'counter-terrorism' expenditure highlighted, but I'm just too wiped out to focus any more. Will just say, that I connect the counter-terrorism expenditure in this way: big business is interfering and manipulating o/seas for big bucks -- it's changing the course of countries' histories etc & people's lives. It's doing so for nothing but corporate enrichment. So the government, as I see it, serves corporations instead of people. There's no ideals here. It's not about ideals. It's not about aid. It's not about justice. It's none of the crap that we're fed in the papers, in other media or at the movies. It's MONEY pure and simple. While budgets are being cut and everyday people are missing out in Australia, the government is shelling out over $600m on counter-terrorism that CORPORATIONS (and the governments that serve them) are responsible for CREATING, in the first place. As it is a a consequence of intervention in foreign countries (for profit), why aren't the corporations paying for that directly instead of allowing the average man to take the hit (ie. less resources available for the citizens). Average guy (and not the oil profiteer) will also take a hit if it comes down to troops on the ground. Why don't governments just come out and SAY: we're going in here (or there) because we want resources and money. Why lie about it? Why make out it's something it's not? Fortunes have been made (and empires have won over and over again) by imperialists of one kind or another. Imperialists of yesteryear and corporate imperialists of today). But where's the money? I think people are entitled to ask. People die for these imperialist wars. But Average Joe doesn't get a cut of the action ... and, at the end of the day, Average Joe is the one who'll take up a gun and fight the dirty oil wars. Didn't cover as much ground as I would have liked to today. But I figure if I learn one or two new things a day, every little bit helps to gradually build the big picture. What for? No idea. Just a challenge, I guess. *excuse typos. *tired. #on last legs. |
August 26, 2014
CRIMEA
CRIMEA
[Wikipedia] |
Quickie Round-up
Been slack maintaining entries. Twitter is a much faster medium with a sense of immediacy. Quite addictive. Been like a heroin junkie on twitter lately. Twitter more suited to churning information, which I'm doing right now. Blogger's a snail in comparison but it's a wonderful medium for more involved discussion of information. So what's been happening: Middle East Attendees: Turkey, US, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Egypt & Jordan. |
Above is just a quickie (and not necessarily complete) round-up from memory of last day or so events/news.
Excuse typos. In hurry.
Labels:
ECB,
EU,
Eurozone,
Friends of Syria,
Iran,
Iraq,
Israel,
Italy,
Lebanon,
Libya,
Middle East,
NATO,
POLAND,
Russia,
Saudi Arabia,
Serbia,
Spain,
Turkey,
US
August 24, 2014
UKRAINE - Andrei Stenin Murdered (Uncomfirmed Report)
[...] My opinion is expressed by an additional 16 August, it was such a quote:
Gerashchenko blurted out that Stenin in the hands of the SBU, before Stenina tortured. Then he was forced to reverse.
|
Translation comes out a bit garbled.
Basically, photographer Russian Andrei Stenin, who has been documenting the independence supporters defence of East Ukraine went 'missing' on 12th August (from recollection).
Ukraine's Anton Gerashchenko let slip that he was in the hands of the SBU, as the above says. However, he backtracked and later claimed that this was a 'mistake'.
Meanwhile, the writer of the above post (that's been translated from Russian) says he'd predicted this as the likely outcome regarding missing Andrei Stenin.
So the writer is saying that he has predicted Stenin would be tortured and then disposed of to cover up evidence.
The guys defending East Ukraine (Novorossiya) have no motive to kill their photojournalist.
SBU is Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny - here. Roughly translates to Security Service of Ukraine. The head is Valentyn Nalyvaichenko.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)