TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts

December 04, 2015

Syria - British Airstrkes & Dodgy Dave's Lies

Article
SOURCE
as marked


SYRIA

SUMMARY
UK MoD report disputed David Cameron lies
re 70,000 'moderate rebels'

-->  “misleading”

MoD
OVERRULED @ meeting

-->  Joint Intelligence C'ttee
incl. heads: MI6, MI5 & GCHQ
+ senior military & Foreign Office staff

Dodgy Dave's lies: 
like Tony Blair’s “dodgy dossier” on #Iraq WMD
Cameron / British claim to:
Target Islamic State Oil Assets in #Syria
--> over 380 UK targets, in over 1yr  
[Comment: bet they're Bullsh*t claims.  Must have been targeting Assad for over a year, because ISIS went on selling oil to Turkey & whoever else is in on the finance-the-terrorists scheme to take down Syria]
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-joins-airstrikes-in-syria-against-isis-1449131829


NOTE this is 2013 Article
WikiLeaks cables have since revealed 2006
Israel-US plan to take down Syria
Note also:  oil reserves Golan Heights
SOURCE
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines
SUMMARY
Scumbag Hollande - 2013
welcomed the UK air force strikes in #Syria
--> Syria intervention plan fuelled by oil interests

Backers of attack on Syria:
US, UK, Israel + France
-  cooperation w/ Saudi Arabia
--> 2007 CIA anti-Syria ops {Seymour Hersh}
deploy:  al-Qaeda

w/ US approval
Saudi Arabia bankroll + give logistical aid
to Sunni radicals
hostile to US & al-Qaeda linked
to attack #Syria

#Syria
Covert US political + financial support
-- via Saudi Arabia --
given to:  exiled Syrian Muslim Brotherhood

former French foreign minister Roland Dumas:
-->  Britain planned covert action in Syria as early as 2009

Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas
stated on TV that:   Britain was preparing gunmen to invade Syria --> in 2009

Syria
2011 uprisings
-- domestic energy shortages + climate-induced droughts
-->  massive food price hikes
--> EXPLOITED

WikiLeaks Stratfor e-mails
--> CONFIRM US-UK training of Syria 'opposition' since 2011
to collapse ASSAD govt from within.

US General Wesley Clark
(Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000)
--> confirms serial conquest =  strategy for control of region's vast oil & gas resources.


2008 US Army-funded RAND report:
--> industrialized states to continue to rely heavily on oil
--> oil production:  Middle East

#Syria
proven oil reserves Persian Gulf
coincide w/ power base of
Salafi-jihadist network
oil supplies / linked w. 'long war'

Regional policy trajectories:
1. divide & rule (salafists-jihadists)
2. exploit sustained Shia-Sunni Conflict

West policy (1)
divide & rule (salafists-jihadists)
turn groups against each other
/ covert action, info ops 
divide & rule (salafists-jihadists)
discredit transnational jihadist in local eyes

divide & rule (salafists-jihadists)
support indigenous security forces / local allies

West policy (2)
exploit sustained Shia-Sunni conflict
--> side with:  conservative Sunni regimes against Shiite empowerment

-> USA to shore up Sunni regimes in Saudi Arabia #Egypt & #Pakistan
-> to containing #Iran power in ME & Gulf

USA aware backing Sunni regimes
--> result:  empowering al-Qaeda jihadists
BUT this to advantage of West.

Support Sunni & exploit:
bogging down jihadi activity w. internal sectarian rivalry
{rather than targeting US}

American Saudi Arabia allies Salafi-jihadist
--> afraid of upsurge in Shia identity
--> to want to target #IRAN vs #USA

Following vulnerable to internal destabilisation:
1) Saudi Arabia
2) Gulf States
3) Egypt
4) Syria
5) Iran
Internal destabilisation factors - multiple, converging:
a) rapid population growth
b) 'youth bulge'
c) internal economic inequalities
d) political frustrations
e) sectarian tensions
f) water shortages - environment
Syria
= pipeline geopolitics
/ Assad refused to sign Qatar pipeline deal 2009
re supply Europe via Syria
ie.  bypassing Russia

Note that British plan for invasion Syria 2009
coincides w/ Assad refusal of Qatar pipeline deal
to supply gas to Europe


Nabucco pipeline
backed by
USA & European Union
         parties:

            Austria-UAE
            Hungarian
            Romania
            Bulgaria
            Turkey
            Germany*

        --------------------    ie

                OMV - Austria-UAE
                      {Romania Turkey Hungary interests}
                MOL - Hungarian
                Transgaz - Romania
                Bulgargaz - Bulgaria
                BOTAS - Turkey
                RWE - Germany, big / largest investor Egypt
                -- 2015 sale oil & gas unit to:
        Russian billionaire Mikhail Fridman
                RWE operates:  Europe, Middle East & Africa
                RWE partnership w/ British & Netherlands
                re Urenco Group uranium enrichment plants: 
                in Germany, Netherlands,USA & UK
                -- supplies nuclear power stations in 15 countries
                -- sale of depleted uranium tails
                -- Russia owns radioactive waste
                -- waste transported to Seversk

            [wikipedia]


Middle East interests in the Nabucco Qatar LNG pipeline

    proposed route:
  •     -Qatar
  •     -Saudi Arabia
  •     -Kuwait
  •     -Iraq
  •     -Turkey
  •     -Jordan
http://www.thenational.ae/business/energy/qatar-seeks-gas-pipeline-to-turkey#full
 [link as above]
 

Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan
-->  attempt to bribe Russia to dump Syria
w/ Saudi 'block of gas' to Europe assurances

Russia wasn't buying what assurances of the Saudi
/ stuck w. #Syria
Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline plan = slap in face of #Qatar

Putin refusal to take bait & sell out #Syria
Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan
vowed military action.

Saudi Arabia Intelligence Agency
Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan
director general:  Saudi Intelligence Agency
2012 to 2014
--> supporters: Chechen terrorists

Bandar bin Sultan
confrontational re USA
--> Replaced by:  Prince Muhammad bin Nayef
head Saudi intel

Muhammad bin Nayef
Head of Saudi Arabia Intelligence

--> escaped x4 assassination attempts
--> incl. rectum bomb 
{ ... lol, always get a laugh out of that detail }

ALSO pulling strings in Middle East oil-focused US policy in Syria:
  • Qatar + 
  • Saudi Arabia
aim: pliable Syria opposition

Writer concludes Assad is 'war criminal'
[comment: 
--> but  USA a pre-eminent war criminal & Ghouta was a false flag by USA-Gulf proxies.]
SOURCE
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines



SUMMARY
British Airstrikes on Syria
UK Tornado attack planes
deployed to:  Akrotiri, Cyprus - first raid 3 Dec.
support:  Voyager tanker + Reaper drone
variable payload

The Brimstone
automated anti-armour missile
for use re fast-moving platforms
first fielded #Afghanistan 2008

The Brimstone
light warhead - 9 kg /  a range of 7.5 miles
-->  can be used on fast jets, helicopters & UAVs

The Brimstone
laser-guided missiles
UK  RAF weapons of choice
since #Libya in 2011

UK RAF Tornados - transit from Cyprus to #Iraq:
--> via Israel
--> via Jordan
--> Voyager tanker accompanies

British airstrikes covering #Iraq + #Syria
--> 10 Tornados
-->   9 Eurofighter Typhoon
reinforcement.

The Brimstone
automated anti-armour missile
for use re fast-moving platforms
first fielded #Afghanistan 2008

The Brimstone
light warhead - 9 kg /  a range of 7.5 miles
-->  can be used on fast jets, helicopters & UAVs

The Brimstone
laser-guided missiles
UK  RAF weapons of choice
since #Libya in 2011

#Syria
UK RAF Tornados - transit from Cyprus to #Iraq:
--> via Israel
--> via Jordan
--> Voyager tanker accompanies

British airstrikes covering #Iraq + #Syria
--> 10 Tornados
-->   9 Eurofighter Typhoon
reinforcement.

http://theaviationist.com/2015/12/04/raf-tornados-first-air-strike-in-syria/

AUDIO
Syria / Libya / Refugee Crisis / Turkey

Scott Bennett
former US Army officer
counter-terrorism analyst
'Impeach Obama' / 'Arrest Carter'



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT
Some of what I've enjoyed looking at today.

The stakeholders in the Nabucco pipeline gets complicated, once you start looking at the companies.  eg.  Austrian stakeholder itself has a United Arab Emirates stakeholder.  So working out who's really who would take more time, patience and focus than I have.  Above is just a rough, surface sketch re the companies.

The US military guy's audio was kind of cool.  He's anticipating a Turkey military coup against Erdogan.  I don't know if he might be a bit melodramatic there or not, as I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced.  At this stage, it sounds good but far-fetched to me.

Key info re Syria (now superseded by further info indicating 2006 planned attack):
    Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas
    Britain planning covert invasion / attack on Assad
    as early as 2009

    WikiLeaks Stratfor e-mails
    confirm US-UK training Syria 'opposition' since 2011
    to collapse Assad from within

    British attack
    coincides w. Assad rejection of
    Qatar pipeline deal 2009
    in favour of Russian interests

    NB   Qatar pipeline deal 2009
    benefits USA & European Union
US 4-Star General, General Wesley Clark (Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000) confirms a serial conquest strategy for region (7 countries).
NOTE ALSO:

Julian Assange: US & Israel Planned To Overthrow Assad In 2006

Cables reveal that before the beginning of the Syrian revolt and civil war, the United States hoped to overthrow Assad and create strife between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.
By Kit O'Connell
@KitOConnell | September 14, 2015
LONDON — Speaking from Ecuador’s embassy in London, Julian Assange revealed that the United States planned to overthrow the Syrian government as far back as 2006, several years before the start of the current crisis.

...

The ongoing threat to his freedom hasn’t kept Assange from continuing his work revealing the dirty secrets of world governments. His latest revelations come in a Wednesday interview with RT in support of his new book, “The WikiLeaks Files,” published late last month.

The United States and its allies in the Middle East, including Turkey and Israel, have been frequently accused of contributing to the ongoing destabilization of Syria in the wake of the uprising and subsequent civil war which began in 2011. But according to cables from the WikiLeaks archive, discussed in the Syria chapter of Assange’s book, plans to deliberately destabilize the region go back at least five years further.

“In that chapter is a cable from US Ambassador William Roebuck, who was stationed in Damascus, which apparently discusses a plan for the overthrow of the Assad government in Syria,” RT reported.

[ ... ]
The cable also details plans to foster sectarian strife in the region and make Iran appear like a larger threat to Assad than it really was, Assange continued:
“In particular, to take rumors that are known to be false … or exaggerations and promote them – that Iran is trying to convert poor Sunnis, and to work with Saudi and Egypt to foster that perception in order to make it harder for Iran to have influence, and also harder for the government to have influence in the population.”
WikiLeaks cables reveal that these plans came from the Israeli government, and show that the U.S. government intended to work with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Egypt to encourage the breakdown of the Assad regime as a way of also weakening Iran and Hezbollah.
“[I]f Syria sufficiently destabilized, it might be in a position where it can keep the Golan Heights forever, or even advance that territory,” Assange said.
According to Assange, the cable illuminates how the current Syrian crisis reflects U.S. influence on the Middle East, particularly the ways it has used its allies to put pressure on the country. “Part of the problem in Syria is that you have a number of US allies surrounding it, principally Saudi and Qatar, that are funneling in weapons,” Assange noted, adding that it shows how the U.S. uses its over 100 army bases and network of embassies to further its imperialist interests.

CONTINUES

http://www.mintpressnews.com/julian-assange-us-israel-planned-to-overthrow-assad-in-2006/209493/


As the article re the WikiLeaks cable indicates, the plan to take down Syria began even earlier than indicated by the former French Foreign Minister:  it was outlined in 2006 US cables.

Israel could be a driving force in for US foreign policy in the Middle Eastern region.  As in, the article states:
"WikiLeaks cables reveal that these plans came from the Israeli government."

Maybe this has something to do with it:
Huge oil discovery in Golan Heights - Israeli media
https://www.rt.com/business/317906-oil-golan-heights-israel/
---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------
PS ...
Think I might simplify things too much.  There's a combination of things going on.  It's not just a single driving factor.

I'll probably never understand what's going on.

Just read some Forbes article on Russian billionaires having been bought out of Russia's Rosneft (state oil company), and it's a struggle to understand how anyone can have so much money and how the entire thing works, so what hope is there of understanding politics without understanding of the money men?  lol

I'm really disheartened  ... and I can't comprehend why anyone would spend $14 million on a frigging mammoth.  Apparently, it's a gilded skeleton.  Intended as a good deed for an AIDS charity.  Just looked up the artist:
won the Turner Prize. New York public health officials banned Two Fucking and Two Watching featuring a rotting cow and bull, because of fears of "vomiting among the visitors" [here]
Well, now I'm sure I'll never understand anything on this planet.  Who the f*ck considers a rotting cow art?  This hilarious.  The fellow behind this is the "richest living artist to date."  Guess the 'Virgin Mother' would have taken some effort and talent to produce.  That anyone actually bought the finished product is mind-boggling.  I'd definitely go the mammoth.  ;)

September 14, 2015

WikiLeaks: Oil Motivates U.S. Policy More than Fighting Terrorists - Nafeez Ahmed

Article
SOURCE
alternet | here



Wikileaks' Cables Suggests that Oil Motivates U.S. Policy More than Fighting Terrorists
Cables released by Wikileaks demonstrate that control of the world's strategic energy reserves has always been a key factor in the direction of the "War on Terror".
By Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed / Foreign Policy in Focus
December 16, 2010
Among the batch of classified diplomatic cables recently released by the controversial whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, several have highlighted the vast extent of the financial infrastructure of Islamist terrorism sponsored by key U.S. allies in the ongoing "War on Terror."

One cable by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in December 2009 notes that “donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.” Despite this, “Riyadh has taken only limited action to disrupt fundraising for the UN 1267-listed Taliban and LeT [Lashkar e-Tayyiba] groups that are also aligned with al-Qaeda.”

Clinton raises similar concerns about other states in the Gulf and Central Asia. Kuwait remains reluctant “to take action against Kuwait-based financiers and facilitators plotting attacks outside of Kuwait.” The United Arab Emirates is “vulnerable to abuse by terrorist financiers and facilitation networks” due to lack of regulatory oversight. Qatar’s cooperation with U.S. counter-terrorism is the “worst in the region,” and authorities are “hesitant to act against known terrorists.Pakistani military intelligence officials “continue to maintain ties with a wide array of extremist organizations, in particular the Taliban [and the] LeT.”

Despite such extensive knowledge of these terrorism financing activities, successive U.S. administrations have not only failed to exert military or economic pressure on these countries, but in fact have actively protected them, funneling billions of dollars of military and economic assistance. The reason is oil.

It's the Hydrocarbons, Stupid

Oil has always been an overwhelming Western interest in the region, beginning with Britain’s discovery of it in Persia in 1908. Britain controlled most Middle East oil until the end of World War II, after which the United States secured its sphere of influence in Saudi Arabia. After some pushback, Britain eventually accepted the United States as the lead player in the region.US-UK agreement upon the broad, forward-looking pattern for the development and utilization of petroleum resources under the control of nationals of the two countries is of the highest strategic and commercial importance”, reads a 1945 memo from the chief of the State Department’s Petroleum Division.

Anglo-U.S. geo-strategy exerted this control through alliances with the region’s most authoritarian regimes to ensure a cheap and stable supply of petroleum to Western markets. Recently declassified secret British Foreign Office files from the 1940s and 1950s confirm that the Gulf sheikhdoms were largely created to retain British influence in the Middle East. Britain pledged to protect them from external attack and to “counter hostile influence and propaganda within the countries themselves.” Police and military training would help in “maintaining internal security.” Similarly, in 1958 a U.S. State Department official noted that the Gulf sheikhdoms should be modernized without undermining “the fundamental authority of the ruling groups.”

The protection of some of the world’s most virulent authoritarian regimes thus became integral to maintaining Anglo-U.S. geopolitical control of the world’s strategic hydrocarbon energy reserves. Our governments have willingly paid a high price for this access – the price of national security.

Still Funding Radicalism

One of al-Qaeda’s chief grievances against the West is what Osama bin Laden dubs the “Crusader-Jewishpresence in the lands of Islam, including support for repressive Arab regimes. Under U.S. direction and sponsorship, many of these allies played a central role in financing and supporting bin Laden’s mujahideen networks in Afghanistan to counter Soviet influence. It is perhaps less well understood that elements of the same regimes continued to support bin Laden’s networks long after the Cold War – and that they have frequently done so in collusion with U.S. intelligence services for short-sighted geopolitical interests.

In fact, Afghanistan provides a rather revealing example. From 1994 to 2001, assisted by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the Clinton and Bush II administrations covertly sponsored, flirted and negotiated with the Taliban as a vehicle of regional influence. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, former White House Special Assistant to Ronald Reagan, also testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on South Asia about the “covert policy that has empowered the Taliban,” in the hopes of bringing sufficient stability to “permit the building of oil pipelines from Central Asia through Afghanistan to Pakistan.”

The Great Game is still in full swing. “Since the U.S.-led offensive that ousted the Taliban from power, the project has been revived and drawn strong U.S. support” reported the Associated Press in 2005. “The pipeline would allow formerly Soviet Central Asian nations to export rich energy resources without relying on Russian routes. The project’s main sponsor is the Asian Development Bank” – in which the United States is the largest shareholder alongside Japan. It so happens that the southern section of the proposed pipeline runs through territory still under de facto Taliban control, where NATO war efforts are focused.

Other evidence demonstrates that control of the world’s strategic energy reserves has always been a key factor in the direction of the "War on Terror". For instance, the April 2001 study commissioned by then-Vice President Dick Cheney confirmed official fears of an impending global oil supply crunch, energy shortages, and “the need for military intervention” in the Middle East to maintain stability.

Energy and Iran

Other diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks show clearly that oil now remains central to U.S. policy toward Iran, depicting an administration desperate to “wean the world” off Iran’s oil supply, according to the London Telegraph. With world conventional oil production most likely having peaked around 2006, Iran is one of few major suppliers that can potentially boost oil output by another 3 million barrels, and natural gas output by even more.  The nuclear question is not the real issue, but provides ample pretext for isolating Iran.

But the U.S. anti-Iran stance has been highly counterproductive. In a series of dispatches for the New Yorker, Seymour Hersh cited U.S. government and intelligence officials confirming that the CIA and the Pentagon have funneled millions of dollars via Saudi Arabia to al-Qaeda-affiliated Sunni extremist groups across the Middle East and Central Asia. The policy – officially confirmed by a U.S. Presidential Finding in early 2008 began in 2003 and has spilled over into regions like Iraq and Lebanon, fuelling Sunni-Shi’ite sectarian conflict.

Not only did no Democratic members of the House ever contest the policy but President Obama reappointed the architect of the policy – Robert Gates – as his defence secretary. As former National Security Council staffers Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett observe, Obama’s decision earlier this year to step up covert military operations in North Africa and the Middle East marked an “intensification of America’s covert war against Iran.”

This anti-Iran directive, which extends covert U.S. support for anti-Shi’ite Islamist militant networks linked to al-Qaeda, hardly fits neatly into the stated objectives of the "War on Terror." Unless we recognize that controlling access to energy, not fighting terror, is the primary motive.

Beyond Dependency

While classified covert operations continue to bolster terrorist activity, the Obama administration struggles vainly to deal with the geopolitical fall-out. Getting out of this impasse requires, first, recognition of our over-dependence on hydrocarbon energy sources to the detriment of real national security. Beholden to the industry lobbyists and the geopolitical dominance that control of oil provides, Western governments have supported dictatorial regimes that fuel widespread resentment in the Muslim world. Worse, the West has tolerated and until recently colluded in the sponsorship of al-Qaeda terrorist activity by these regimes precisely to maintain the existing global energy system.

Given the convergence of peak oil and climate change, it is imperative to transition to a new, renewable energy system.  Such a transition will mitigate the impact of hydrocarbon energy depletion, help prevent the worst effects of anthropogenic global warming, and contribute to economic stability through infrastructure development and job creation.

By weaning us off our reliance on dubious foreign regimes, a shift to renewables and away from supporting oil dictatorships will also make us safer.
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development in London and a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus. His latest book is A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It (2010). He blogs at The Cutting Edge.
SOURCE
alternet | here
---------------------- ꕤ  ----------------------
COMMENT

Another great article.

I'm hopeless at taking everything in at once.  Will have to do some really brief notes for myself.

So when the West isn't actively sponsoring Middle Eastern terrorism, the West overlooks sponsorship of terrorism by British-installed sheikdoms, favourably disposed to US and allied interests that keep them propped up in power?

The US has muscled in on Britain's Middle Eastern turf post-WWII, and Britain plays second banana to the US in the region, while the US is BFF with Saudi Arabia, until the oil runs out.

The key regional Western-propped dictator (Western-puppet ... or is that partner?) regimes, sponsoring terrorism and sectarian kill-fests (to maintain their self-serving and exploitative power grip on the region), are: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Pakistan.
Surprised that Pakistan is there, although I know Pakistan's terrorist central.  Why?  Pakistan seems like odd man out.
The Brits made a deal that should be void:  ie protecting the puppet monarchs from *internal* challenges ... which effectively means taking part in enslaving these populations under the control of these Western propped monarchies or other dictatorships, because it precludes the rise of anything remotely close to 'proper democracy' (if that's actually possible ... anywhere), I would think.

British pledges to protect don't mean much, unless there's something in it for the British (I think it was Persia that they slimed out of protecting some time around the turn of last century or perhaps just before that):
"... when Britain failed to defend Persia in the Russo-Persian War of 1826-28-a course of inaction which Britain was fully justified in taking because Persia had started the war and the 1814 mutual defense agreement obligated Britain to defend Persia only against aggression-the Shah concluded that Britain was an unreliable ally, and in effect he went over to the Russian side." [here]
Wow, that was way earlier than I thought.  It was the early 1800s.  The Shah concluded correctly, in my opinion. lol  Stick with the Russians, Persia.
Bin Laden wasn't happy about the Western support for repressive regimes in the region; but it also sounds like there's maybe a religious and cultural element to OBL's objection, judging by the terminology used:  'Crusader-Jewish'?  Or maybe I'm reading too much into that?

Looks like OBL had forgotten that Islam itself was spread in the region through conquest of people and territories.  Not that the West is planning on spreading any ideology ... it's only profits for the wealthy that matter.

Asian Development Bank, Japan and USA have a stake in a pipeline project that is intended to run through Taliban controlled territory and this is where NATO concentrated its aggression.  So, wherever NATO is, profit is? 

With Obama's blessing, Robert Gates was the mastermind of a policy backing Sunni extremist vs the Shia side in the region (against Iran's interests),  while US GOVERNMENT, US INTELLIGENCE, the PENTAGON and CIA funnelled dollars for this project, via Saudi Arabia, who, in turn, flicked the dollars to al-Qaeda. 
It's thanks to Gates' policy that there's a spread of sectarian violence in the Middle East, including Iraq and Lebanon. 
The funnelling of money that reached al-Qaeda is confirmed (presidential finding, 2008).  So this isn't speculation.

So, I take it there's no organised Islamic 'war on terror' 'death cult' about to attack anyone in here in the West, and there's only the random crazy head-chopping incident associated with the consequences of mass displacement and mass immigration, to sidestep when out and about, say, doing a spot of furniture shopping?

That Robert Gates struck me as shifty and creepy looking when I saw him in this video, filmed on the day of Julian Assange's arrest in Britain, almost 5 years ago:


ROBERT GATES
US Defence Secretary
in
Afghanistan


7 Dec 2010

Associated Press



If I hadn't got interested in Ukraine and then curious about Assange and WikiLeaks, I'd probably never have paid this creepy old man any attention.  And look what fun I'd have missed out on.  lol

Imagine this guy knows where all the bodies are buried.
So, Gates, the architect of Hell (ie the policy of funnelling American money to Sunni al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists, in the Middle East) has been free the last 5 years, while Australian journalist, Julian Assange, has been a political prisoner in Britain (Britain, which is America's Middle Eastern second banana partner in oil and crime) -- held without charge, for exposing US and allied war crimes, those same 5 years that Architect of Hell, Robert Gates, has been free.

Ehem.  Western values?  Where's those Western values plate-face, Dave Cameron's been preaching, then?  Eh?
How can this be permitted to happen in democracies, among free men?
Can somebody please help Assange:
Julian Assange
Australian Journalist
FAQ & Support
https://justice4assange.com/




Assange
Transnational Security Elite,
Carving Up the World Using Your Tax Money

London 
OCT8 Antiwar Mass Assembly (2011)
Link  |  here



-----------
PS
I'm hoping I'll remember some of this.  Terrible recall of facts.  lol

But I've discovered that information has a mysterious way of seeping in without being aware that it has.  A couple of times I've written things I thought were original ideas ... until I remembered where I'd read whatever it was that I'd laboured over ... for ages. It was rather upsetting to find out I'm not at all an original thinker.  lol



September 05, 2015

'Is Obama the Worst President Ever?'



SOURCE
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/03/is-obama-the-worst-president-ever/
September 3, 2015
Is Obama the Worst President Ever?

by Dave Lindorff


Obama is on track to go down in history as one of the, or perhaps as the worst and most criminal presidents in US history.

He started out, campaigning in 2008, as someone would would restore the rule of law in US international affairs and here at home after eight years of criminality during the Bush and Cheney administration, as saying he would end America’s wars and bring back an era of international cooperation and negotiation, and as saying that he would confront the dire threat of global climate change.

On the basis of that promise, he won a dramatic election victory, raising hopes across the country and across many voting blocks. On that basis, he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize — the first time the award was given before anything had been done by the laureate being honored. And on the basis of that promise, people expected action on climate change.

Instead, the president began backpedaling almost instantly. Instead of restoring the rule of law, he almost immediately announced that he would not permit his Justice Department to engage in any prosecutions of CIA, FBI, military of Bush/Cheney administration personnel for violations of international law or of US law. He introduced new secrecy rules, launched a record number of prosecutions of government whistleblowers, including an international manhunt to arrest or kill NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden which included the forcing down of a presidential aircraft carrying the president of Bolivia, wrongly suspected of flying Snowden from Russia to that Latin American country, and a secret espionage indictment against Wikileaks founder Julien Assange, who has thus been trapped for years in the little UK embassy of Ecuador which has granted him asylum. And most egregiously, Barack Obama, sabotaged the first international meeting on climate change held in Denmark, and has ducked every opportunity to have the US lead on reaching an international agreement to seriously reduce global carbon emissions.

During the three Congressional electoral cycles and his re-election campaign in 2012, Obama studiously avoided pressing on any of these key issues, and especially on climate change. His position: “all of the above”, for energy development, has seen the US move, not towards carbon emission reductions, but towards expanded production of gas, oil and even coal extraction, making the US the largest oil producer in the world, and a major provider of dirty coal to both US electric companies and large coal using countries abroad, including China.

Now we have this flimflam artist up in Alaska, talking about the crisis he has helped worsen, calling it an existential issue. And yet even as he speaks, the Shell Oil Company is towing a giant oil drilling rig up to the Arctic Ocean, thanks to an Obama administration permit, to begin drilling for oil in the shallow waters north of Alaska — drilling for yet more oil, that is, even as the world is facing a glut of the stuff, in a delicate region that would be devastated by a well blow-out, because ice would make containment an impossibility.

Future generations of Americans will surely look back at President Obama as not just a con-man, but as someone who blew several trillion dollars on continued wars around the globe, as someone who terminally destroyed the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, instead of rescuing these documents as promised, and as the president who, when given the last real opportunity to reverse climate change, ducked the challenge and pandered to the corporations that selfishly wanted short-term gain over long-term survival for humanity and the biosphere.

There are plenty of other criminal acts by this president to consider. On his watch, this first African-American president allowed an increased national police to become a fully-armed occupying army across the country. No American today is safe from abusive police who make up crimes and ignore the law at will, but paying a uniquely terrible price are African-Americans and other people of color, who once gave this president 90% of their votes or more, but who now are being gunned down with a grim regularity by mostly white cops who fire at the slightest provocation, even at unarmed kids. On his watch too, young children, fleeing US-caused gang violence in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and elsewhere in Latin America, have been sent back to their home countries illegally, or held in prisons in this country in violation of direct court orders. He also ordered his Justice Department not to prosecute the criminal bankers who willfully destroyed the US and the global economy to profit themselves and their institutions.

This president, let’s be clear, has not just been incompetent and gutless. He has been a slick political fraud and both a common and a Constitutional criminal. In a just nation of engaged citizens, Obama would already have been impeached for any number of serious crimes, beginning with the failure to prosecute known war criminals of the Bush/Cheney administration, including the president and vice-president themselves.

That’s not going to happen, because this is not a just nation of engaged citizens.

But there will be a reckoning. History will judge this president harshly, as it has judged criminal leaders of the past, from Rome’s Nero to Italy’s Mussolini or Uganda’s Idi Amin. It may strike some as hyperbole to put President Obama in league with such universally acknowledged monsters as these, but when human beings begin dying by the millions because of climate-change caused famines, floods, droughts and international armed conflicts we will surely look back at the actions and inactions of this particular president, who had the opportunity to make a huge difference and chose not just to do nothing, but to make things worse, and will say his crimes perhaps exceeded theirs.

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).
SOURCE
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/03/is-obama-the-worst-president-ever/
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------


What stood out for me:

  • USA refuses to prosecute CIA, FBI, military
[or] Bush/Cheney administration personnel
  • for violating US or international law.


Obama admin:
= violated & continues to violate the Bill of Rights and the Constitution


Obama admin:
allowed militarised police to become a fully-armed occupying army across USA

"No American today is safe from abusive police who make up crimes and ignore the law at will"

Obama admin:
introduced new secrecy rules

Obama admin:
launched a record number of prosecutions of whistleblowers

Obama admin:
engaged in international manhunt for whistleblower Edward Snowden
Obama admin:
forced down of a presidential aircraft carrying the president of Bolivia
(wrongly suspected of flying Snowden from Russia to Bolivia}

Obama admin:
initiated a secret espionage indictment against WikiLeaks founder, journalist-publisher, Julian Assange

(trapped for 5 years in the confines of UK embassy of Ecuador, which has granted him political asylum)


Obama admin:
ordered his Justice Department not to prosecute criminal bankers who destroyed the US & global economy for own profits


Obama admin:
= blew several trillion dollars on continued wars around the globe

Obama admin:
= pandered to corporations out for short-term gain over long-term effects on environment

Obama admin:
= expanded production of gas, oil and even coal extraction
making the US the world's largest oil producer

Thanks to Obama admin:
USA
= a major provider of dirty coal to both US electric companies + large coal using countries abroad, incl. China.

Thanks to Obama admin:
Shell Oil Company
= towing a giant oil drilling rig up to the Arctic Ocean
(Obama administration permit, to begin drilling for oil in the shallow waters north of Alaska)


September 20, 2014

Egypt - Owned by Foreign Oil Companies - $6 BILLION DEBT


EGYPT


----------------------------------------  

WOW!!! >> #Germany #Canada #Italy, Tunisian & ors (?) -- oil & gas exploration deals @ $187m signed by #EGYPT >> goo.gl/I8pV39

>"Egypt has started repaying ... debt to foreign oil companies, which had reached more than $6 BILLION" -- So Egypt pays THEM!


----------------------------------------   
COMMENT

Found this snippet interesting.

It looks like Egypt's paying the money out instead of the other way around, which I would have expected.

Check out the debt to foreign oil companies!  Egypt sounds like it's owned.

This info tells you who is particularly cosy with Egypt, I'm guessing.