Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
role of reading indictments to the German leaders on trial
served with the International Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials, investigating Krupp
wrote several books about his war experiences including an account of the capitalist victor trials
was awarded the Bronze Star by the US government 1948
promoted to lieutenant-colonel 1950 (retroactive from 1948)
1950 & 1951, stood for the Conservative Party
career was held back by a heart attack he suffered in 1959
Neave - campaign manager for Margaret Thatcher's leadership of Conseratives bid
1975, Thatcher elected leader
Neave rewarded with post as head of Thatcher private office
/ then appointed Shadow Sec. of State, Northern Ireland
/ & poised to take equivalent cabinet position at time of assassination, in the event of 1979 Conservatives win
Neave was a strong supporter of Roy Mason, who had extended the policy of Ulsterisation
Neave - author of the new and radical Conservative policy of abandoning devolution in Northern Ireland
+ concentrating on local government reform instead
this * integrationist policy * abandoned hastily by successor
information from an intelligence agent 'Lee Tracey', claiming Neave had met Tracey, to recruit Tracey to team of intel & security specialists who would ensure politician Tony Benn "was stopped" - ie. alleged assassination of Tony Benn if Labour elected
/ second meeting planned but Neave was killed before meeting took place
MAGNETIC CAR BOMB, fitted with ball-bearing tilt switch, exploded under his new vehicle
at 2:58 pm, as he drove out of PALACE OF WESTMINSTER carpark
/ serious leg injuries - died in hospital without regaining consciousness
INCALCULABLE LOSS TO THE BRITISH RULING CLASS
INLA issued a statement:
In March, retired terrorist and supporter of capital punishment, Airey Neave, got a taste of his own medicine when an INLA unit pulled off the operation of the decade and blew him to bits inside the 'impregnable' Palace of Westminster. The nauseous Margaret Thatcher snivelled on television that he was an 'incalculable loss'—and so he was—to the British ruling class.
Neave assassination x2 days after the vote of no confidence
brought down Callaghan's government (few weeks before the 1979 general election)
saw Conservative victory / Margaret Thatcher to power as PM
Neave's wife: subsequently elevated to the House of Lords as Baroness Airey of Abingdon
following Neave assassination, INLA was declared illegal across UK
KEVIN CAHILL
Kevin Cahill
Kevin James Cahill
author and investigative journalist
1965 and served as a platoon commander
in: Aden, Bahrain, and Northern Ireland
1968, leaves army
University Ulster, BA Eng Lit.
worked as a systems analyst at Farrington Data, Rank Xerox, Glaxo Ltd, Gulf Oil UK
+ Singer & Friedlander merchant bank
/ finished his professional career in computers as a project manager at International Computers Limited
1979 he became a full-time journalist
part-time Research Assistant to Paddy (now Lord) Ashdown in the House of Commons
+ various other
/ advised many politicians
investigative journalist, Kevin Cahill
claimed Neave assassination was an inside job
Neave killed by MI6 agents working with CIA
/ Neave sought to prosecute senior figures in intel establishment for corruption
Cahill wrote:
prior to Neave assassination in 1979, Conservative MP Airey Neave
on verge of a massive overhaul of the security services
possibly merger of MI5 & MI6
due to belief in corruption in security services
Cahill suggested link between assassination of Neave
& Sir Richard Sykes murder
+ attempted murder of: Christopher Tugendhat, 1980
Cahill claims Neave would have been head of the combined security services
+ Sykes (foreign ops) and Tugendhat (home ops) as his deputies
HOUSE OF COMMONS - nobody would talk, says Cahill
"everyone knew" the story behind Neave's death but that no one could talk about it in detail because it would have been too dangerous
Cahill claims security staff did not believe INLA murdered Neave but that it was an "inside job"
FORCED FEDERALISATION
Kevin Cahill book: Trade Wars (1987)
most important historical fact in the book - note in 1954 by a British Civil Servant
(T. W. Garvey, later Sir T. W. Garvey)
INDICATING UK had,
because of the 'special relationship' with USA:
1. "the Loan, the lion's share of MARSHALL AID"
2. "comparative immunity from FORCIBLE FEDERALISATION ..."
Wikipedia: "No historian has been able to explain what 'forcible federalisation' was"
COMMENT: likely the NATO & EUROPEAN UNION capitalist federalisation & the capitalist promotion of dispossession of European peoples, promoted as 'humanitarian' benevolence of capitalism, in what is a push for 'globalisation' of ruling capitalist power - a capitalist-ruled world slave state
Interesting Capitalist History
Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
It was a business world defined by globalization and growing interdependency. But it's not international trade circa 2000. As HBS professor Geoffrey Jones points out, the "global economy" first emerged in the 1870s.
London had a unique role as the international service centre for the emergent global economy, providing information and contacts about investment opportunities worldwide. — Geoffrey Jones
Kevin Cahill book: Who Owns the World: The Hidden Facts Behind Landownership (2006)
Queen Elizabeth II is the legal owner of one sixth of the land on the Earth's surface
/ more than any other individual or nation
/ 6,600 million acres in 32 countries
/ Crown is never separate from the individual who holds it
all territories owned by the Crown,
including Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom,
the governments (on behalf of the people) of those countries DO NOT own the land of the country
but may administer it on behalf of its owner, HM Elizabeth II
/ all forms of land possession in those territories are based, formally and in law, on the Crown's superior ownership
Land Registry in places like the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia cannot register land ownership, only tenure
/ freehold and leasehold are defined in law as forms of tenure, not ownership
USA = only major country in which ownership of land was clearly defined as belonging to the citizens who had paid for it
USA federal govt owns one-third of the land of nation
as a landowner on a legal par with any other landowner and without a superior right to any land other than that endorsed on deeds as the property of the US federal govt
'eminent domain' - gives right of govt federal authorities & bodies to acquire privately owned land for public purposes
ENOCH POWELL
Enoch Powell, Ulster Unionist
claimed in an interview with The Guardian, 1984
that Americans had killed:
1. Airey Neave
2. Lord Mountbatten
3. Robert Bradford MP
said: evidence came from a member of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
said (1986): Neave assassinated by "MI6 and their friends"
Neave's Northern Ireland policy had been one of integration with the rest of the UK
Americans feared that this process, if implemented, would be irreversible
Enoch Powell claimed;
Neave assassination
intended to make the British govt adopt a policy more acceptable to America in her aim of a united Ireland within NATO
wife: married in 1942 Diana Josceline Barbara Giffard
WHEN GOING TO BED WITH DOGS IS NEWS, GETTING UP WITH FLEAS IS A SCOOP – HERE’S THE ONE ABOUT TRUMP’S BED, PUTIN’S BED
By John Helmer, Moscow
[ ... ]
A claim is being widely reported in the US media which supported Hillary Clinton for president that President-elect Donald Trump paid for at least two ladies to urinate on the bed in the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel of Moscow. A former British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) agent named Christopher Steele has reported the episode in a memorandum dated June 20, 2016, because he was paid by a US client to do it; and also because he was paid to speculate that the Russian Security Service (FSB) filmed it, and has been blackmailing Trump ever since.
Trump has responded that Steele is a “failed spy”. That is not an impetuous tweet. It’s the assessment of both US and British intelligence agencies, including MI6, for which Steele worked undercover in Moscow between 1994 and 1996. His cover was blown; he was evacuated; and as British intelligence sources report this week, Steele has been unable to enter Russia for a decade. “No Russian with official links and knowledge would risk communicating with Steele for fear of being detected by Russian counter-intelligence,” said an intelligence source in London, Said another: “I met [Steele] a couple of times and thought that for a relatively undistinguished man who never made very senior rank he was a smug, arrogant s.o.b. So I don’t work with him. The description of his being the top expert on Russia in MI6 is bollocks. ”
Murdoch's Vice News Rolls Over for MI6 in Litvinenko Farce
Between this and Vice's relentless lying about what is going on in Ukraine, covered in detail in Russia Insider, it is pretty obvious that Vice has sold out, lock, stock and barrel
It's a dumb move if you are going for the youth market
Anyone who believes VICE isn’t mainstream news should be aware Rupert Murdoch pushed $70 million of his money into buying a piece of the VICE action (buying his kid a seat on the VICE board of directors.) In a piece worthy of Murdoch’s British tabloid ‘The Sun on Sunday’ the public is treated to a rank psy-ops piece:
The 328-page report said there was a “strong probability” the Russian intelligence agency (FSB) directed two men to poison Litvinenko in London, and that this operation was “probably” sanctioned by then FSB head Nikolai Patrushev and Russian President Vladimir Putin
Yep, trust VICE to roll over for the MI6 murder novel at the snap of a neocon finger, with no critical exam of the wider facts surrounding Alexander Litvinenko’s death. The most remarkable words in the British report blaming the Kremlin and Putin are “probability” and “probably.”Probability and probably are NOT evidence but rather spinning an inescapable admission there is no hard evidence backing the accusations. So it is, the west ups the ante in its demonizing Vladimir Putin with sham report per rank propaganda purposes (recalling the Dutch investigation of MH 17.)
This case has always smelled to high heaven. Former FSB officer Litvinenko had all the wrong friends/trusted all the wrong people. As sloppy as the hit on him was, people the British have an ax to grind with (Russians) are purportedly to blame, but Litvinenko’s MI6 employer should be every bit as suspect as anyone.
“Professional standards require intelligence professionals to lie, hide information, or use covert tactics to protect their “cover,” access, sources, and responsibilities. The Central Intelligence Agency [as well, MI6] expects, teaches, encourages, and controls these tactics so that the lies are consistent and supported (“backstopped”). The CIA [as well, MI6] expects intelligence officers to teach others to lie, deceive, steal, launder money, and perform a variety of other activities [such as ‘psy-ops’ or information operations] that would certainly be illegal if practiced in the United States [or Britain]. They call these tactics “tradecraft,” and intelligence officers practice them in all the world’s intelligence services”.
A case can be made the preponderance of circumstantial evidence points to the opposite direction of the (heavily influenced by MI6) British report’s conclusion.
More likely Litvinenko’s *truly fatal* mistake was to begin working with Spanish authorities on breaking down the illicit heroin trade at a time when a British ambassador who had been recently fired subsequently penned an essay ‘Britain protecting the biggest heroin crop of all time’ coinciding with revelations both CIA & MI6 had been paying millions in off-record cash to the Karzai government in Kabul (noting Hamid Karzai’s brother, Walid, was both; renting a large compound to the CIA and concurrently playing kingpin in Afghanistan’s heroin trade).. even as Russia’s anti-heroin efforts are undermined by NATO:
https://youtu.be/Eq1ARmmqKm8
Meanwhile, the British ambassador would appear to have been sent packing for investigating the problem from neighboring Uzbekistan. It is interesting to note his linking the murdered former Russian anti-corruption investigator Alexander Letvnenko to uncovering the Afghan heroin pipeline to St Petersburg… a murder blamed in popular media on Russia with no critical exam whatsoever of Litvinenko’s subsequent MI6 connections in this regard.
A CIA/MI6 joint venture? After, (video, above) the Russians’ high visibility whistle-blowing, there is grudging (and minimal) actions by NATO, busting just a few labs out of hundreds and ONLY those labs it would seem are not under the CIA’s protection. The southwest of Afghanistan is the poppy region where the USA military had taken a ‘hands off’ attitude and done little to nothing to address the problem.Any drug interdiction program efforts had been initiated against only THOSE OPUIM FARMERS WHO DO BUSINESS WITH THE TALIBAN, or 15% of the labs and traffickers. As the USA wound down the American military involvement, it is clear the problem had never been honestly addressed.
Again, Litvenenko’s fatal mistake likely had been to concurrently cooperate with Spanish intelligence on Russian mafia, bringing him too close to his expertise on the Afghan heroin pipeline. That MI6 may have been the actual perpetrator of Litvenenko’s murder is almost a certainty, with MI6 having been identified as piling ‘off the record’ cash to the government of Karzai and its known close connections to heroin trafficking. The product can’t be moved to Russia (ultimately via Russian mafia on the St Petersburg end) by the Americans and British without cooperation bought from the Afghans at the source, again recalling Hamid Karzai’s brother, Walid, was both; renting a large compound to the CIA and concurrently playing kingpin in Afghanistan’s heroin trade. So Litvinenko easily could have been killed by his MI6 employer with Putin blamed as a matter of frosting on the intelligence agency hit. May as well get some gain when embarrassing circumstance requires the killing of your own agent. In the close alternative scenario, MI6 had debriefed Litvinenko with an eye to murdering him in the initial plan; when they’d hired the former FSB anti-corruption expert with entirely too much knowledge of the Russian end of the so-called ‘St Petersburg pipeline.’
At the end of the day, it come down to western intelligence complicity in the Afghan heroin trade is old news.
EMAIL STORY
Correspondents Report - Sunday, 24 October , 2004
Reporter: Kirsten Aiken
HAMISH ROBERTSON: Finally to Britain, where there's a tradition of enjoying the spectacle of high profile and opinionated public figures making complete fools of themselves.
Boris Johnson's attempts to rationalise the central point of an article in his magazine the Spectator, which attacked the people of Liverpool for over-reacting to the gruesome death of British engineer Ken Bigley in Iraq, included a visit to the home city of the Beatles to make a grovelling apology.
But as one newspaper later reported, Liverpudlians who'd been stung by the severity of the comments were split between those who loathed Boris Johnson and wished he'd go home, and those who loathed him and wished he'd never come in the first place.
Here's our London Reporter Kirsten Aiken.
KIRSTEN AIKEN: A taste for controversy is how the conservative Spectator magazine promotes itself. This past week it could be said to have satisfied a very large appetite after accusing Liverpudlians of too extreme a reaction following the beheading of one of their former residents, British engineer Ken Bigley, who was murdered by Iraqi insurgents earlier this month.
The magazine, edited by the Conservative frontbencher Boris Johnson, touted: "we've lost our sense of proportion about such things" – because a minute's silence was held to mark Ken Bigley's memory in an international football match in the days after the horrific incident.
And the anonymously written article didn't stop there.
"The fact that such a tribute was demanded emphasised the mawkish sentimentality of a society that has become hooked on grief and likes to wallow in a sense of vicarious victimhood." [comment: what an assh*le article. This would be fair comment if he The Specator were talking about the anti European victimhood propaganda the state and corporate media propaganda machine pushes while pushing an agenda of European divestment, but the article's referring to the barbaric slaughter of an Englishman.]
It was too much for Liverpudlians, whose sporting fans were also accused of contributing to the Hillsboro football tragedy in which more than 50 people died.
[comment: I've not read the article, but I'm assuming there was maybe a commemoration for the sporting fans that were killed in a crush? Although (generally speaking) I find what you might call victimhood status generation and public displays of victimhood unattractive, the politicians and their corporate media scribes are first to use victimhood propaganda to shape public opinion, so why are they on the offensive in this instance?
Political reasons. It involves Muslims who have been permitted to colonise and buy Britain. Muslims who are actively encouraged by politicians and the government to invest money in Britain. So this is about politicians pimping the heritage of Britons, in exchange for MONEY for the ruling elites. Therefore, politicians are also invested in putting out any 'fires' that may potentially put at risk the monetary rewards the political and economic elites anticipate to receive, as they sell the heritage from under Britons. ]
Not sure what was going on with Boris Johnson in relation to Muslims back in 2004, but I expect as Mayor of the Muslim stronghold in Britain, it would have been much the same as today: a desire for influence over an enormous Muslim settlement in London and a desire for MONEY / INVESTMENT from Muslims abroad.
EDIT / COMMENT:
The biggest factor at play in Britain at that time would have been British politicians and media intent on disseminating propaganda to ensure continued illegal British military presence in Iraq, as the British Ruling Capitalists have sunk a total of £9.24 billion of British taxpayer money into the illegal Iraq war).
"I'm the first London Mayor of 'Muslim extraction', Boris Johnson boasts as he pleads for Arab investment in the capital"
... his great-great-grandfather Ahmed Hamdi, a Muslim entrepreneur who made his money in beeswax
His great-grandfather ‘grew up knowing the Koran off by heart and he would have been stunned to find that his descendant had gone on to become Mayor of this city, and even more amazed to find that the world had so progressed that today we are welcoming the world’s first Islamic Economic Forum to take place outside the Muslim world’.
Mr Johnson announced a £100million fund to encourage tech start-ups from the Muslim world to move to Britain.
It comes after David Cameron unveiled a £200million new Islamic bond - known as a ‘sukuk’ - which complies with Islamic rules on investments and said the London Stock Exchange will launch a new Islamic index alongside the FTSE.
"London Mayor: Islamic State flag shouldn’t be banned because UK is free country"
July 9, 2015
The UK is a free country. Sure. It’s a free country if you preach hatred, jihad, and Sharia. But if you dare to point out that Islam has a doctrine of violence against unbelievers, then no, it is not a free country at all.
Thought the above couple of random articles might explain Johnson's political position.
I'm pretty sure Johnson is of Jewish origins.
Well, it appears that Boris Johnson can call up whatever part of his ancestry serves his political purpose.
Jerusalem Post
"London Mayor Boris Johnson confirmed on Wednesday during a visit to the Western Wall in Jerusalem that he has Jewish ancestry."
07.13.2016 | 7 Tammuz, 5776
“Yes, I have Jews in my family from Moscow, some of them rabbis,” he told Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz, the rabbi of the Western Wall and holy sites. “That’s on my mother’s side.”
On mother's side would make him Jewish, according to Jewish law.
-end comment- ]
It saw locals criticise Boris Johnson for a lack of tact and timing.
[ ...]
KIRSTEN AIKEN: A bumbling Boris Johnson did apologise for causing offence, but insisted he couldn't retract the thrust of the argument, which sought to point out an apparently new British trait of blaming others for one's misfortunes. [comment: Boris Johnson's (and his magazine's) deliberate castigation affront to the Liverpool community's grief, in response to the barbaric murder of a Liverpudlian Englishmen, is POLITICALLY MOTIVATED. This man is a pig, and so is the British government and its politicians, who have SOLD OUT ALL BRITONS for ARAB MONEY. ]
Because Ken Bigley chose to work in one of the world's most dangerous places, against the advice of the foreign office, the article suggests he contributed to his death. It also sought to point out the true mark of maturity in civilization is to cut out ignorant sentimentality.[comment: Again, politicians and the British Foreign Office are quick to use 'sentimentality' when it serves their political proposes, selling war abroad or selling invasion at home. F*cking assh*les. Why is this journalist selling the VICTIM-BLAMING narrative of the British Foreign Office swine who sell out Britons EVERY DAY, IN EVERY WAY, as they destroy their ancestral homeland? Australian news is cucked as.]
But timing, it seems, is everything – a point that wouldn't have escaped Boris Johnson as he later handed out prizes to children at an event titled 'Learn from our mistakes'.
This is Kirsten Aiken in London for Correspondents Report.
Johnson comments that probably aren't politically motivated would be:
The remarks Johnson made about Papua New Guinea's cannibalism and chief killing, which are probably factually correct. So I don't see the problem with that ... although it might be seen as tactless of a politician that is required to display grovelling Culturally Marxist sensibilities at all times.
'Watermelon smiles'? Not sure what that's about, but there's a stereotyped association between Africans and watermelons (probably evolved in the American south). However, I doubt Johnson's intent was to offend.
Judging by these remarks, Boris Johnson could prove an entertaining foreign minister.
At first I was prepared to laugh off Johnson's extramarital-affair, as it's humorous and doesn't seem too important from what is a safe emotional distance of not having the misfortune to be involved with the cheating assh*le that is Boris Johnson.
Now I don't like this guy at all, and I don't trust him.
Boris Johnson's an anti-social whore in more ways than one and it is his potential political whoring and lying that is sure to come to the forefront of foreign affairs issues.
More on Johnson's lying, in case my Boris criticism appear too harsh:
" ... what did we expect from a man who has been fired not once but twice for lying? In 1988 the young Johnson was sacked from The Times for fabricating a quote in an article, and in 2004 he was “relieved of his duties” as shadow arts minister of the Tory Party for allegedly lying about an extra-marital affair." [Independent]
Oh, look, the invasion of yet another European nation continues unabated, alongside empty politician promises:
"... pre-Brexit Johnson promised greater controls on the number of migrants entering the UK. Come Monday, he wrote that migrant numbers won’t fall. Instead the UK will introduce an Australian-style points based immigration system. The very system in which the economy, not the government sets immigration targets. In fact counties which have adopted a points-based system have higher levels of migration." [Independent (as above)]
I feel sick in the stomach reading that.
So European nations are being destroyed for what they call 'the economy'?
Without a nation to speak of, what sense is there in the existence of an economy?
Boris Johnson is Anyone's
Ooooh, look... Boris Johnson's Hasidic when it's politically expedient to be:
Boris Johnson Britain's Scooting Skirt-chaser
Must keep an eye on naughty Boris ;)
Think I might flip back to being pro-Boris ... he's being criticised by the Germans and the French, so that's a positive (and he was pro Brixit, so maybe that makes up for his philandering? ... LOL).
Dislike the French and German politicians more than Johnson's whoring ... I think.
But being party to the implementation of an invasion of Britain and selling out the British for the sake of Arab money is harder to overlook.
[Fixing typos takes me forever, because I make more typos as I fix typos ... because I've got music blaring in my headphones & two senses don't work as effectively as one. But I like it. LOL
OMG ... pasting in a few small codes to house quotes has been a massive edit job because something was out of whack (probably my not removing all block code), so Blogger than spits out what it wants ... and it takes forever to fix. Blogger's giving me anxiety, LOL ]
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
