Invasion of Castrato Europe

Invasion of Castrato Europe What Could Possibly Go Wrong?  Gad Saad Chats With:  Nicolai Sennels  Danish Psychologist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFIfEHeHqwc&feature=youtu.be Best quote: "Progressives pray at the altar of self-flagellation" [Below are my notes, as I've understood video] Interview opens with discussion of different mindsets / psychology / cultural responses, traits, values etc, in terms of observations of immigrant criminality in Denmark.   Talk of freedom of speech as foundation for Western progress / evolution.  However: newspapers censoring selves artists censoring selves professionals censoring selves Either desire not to offend or not to attract violence. Contrast in societies/peoples -- immigrant vs. host: Absence of freedom of speech leads to -->  absence of competition of ideas leads to -->  absence of progress / evolution inhibition of anger /  v. expression of anger honour & shame culture / v. security victim mentality / question of:  locus of control locus of control -- inner versus outer factor experience of 'control' -- westerners, generally raised with inner locus of control -- immigrants, understanding life is created by outer factors -- everything viewed from 'if deity wills it' position -- plus, governed by male figures with completely fixed set of rules, laws, systems of behaviour etc -- thus little experience of inner locus of control or of experimenting with inner locus of control -- certain immigrant groups, it is contended, have outer locus of control -- which lends itself to a victim mentality -- it is question of how one sees cause and effect -- result:  moral individual agency removed -- immigrants = intolerance to out-group members -- West generally not religious but still looking for what is a 'good person' -- for West 'open & tolerant' is the idea of a 'good' person -- new way of defining of what is a 'good' person -- however, West, too open & too tolerant -- furthermore, the same does not apply to immigrants hosted -- minimal integration -- host populations bend to foreign populations -- give & take inapplicable for the West -- guests ought to expect to abide 100%; -- unwise for West to cede an inch -- cultural & religious pressure of in-group very intense -- beatings, being sent back to homeland etc, consequences dire -- if 'Westernised' (eg handling anger differently etc, insult  to culture/religion by showing weakness) Professor Tina Magaard, linguist content analysis religious texts Murderous passages take up large space; 'us & them' logic, in which infidels & apostates characterised as dirty, rotten, criminal, hypocritical, and dangerous. It is also striking how much these texts demand that the reader fight the infidels, both with words and the sword. -- above conclusion drawn by academic after study of texts, that involved counting the occurrence of words Bill Warner -- has spent almost 15 years, doing analysis of religious texts (comparative) -- 'Sharia for the Non-Muslim' (book), highly recommended / authoritative Strong negative views in religious texts, influences the view of non co-religionists -- easier to harm others given mindset -- 'humanistic' view on non co-religionists destroyed by the religious indoctrination [comment:  'humanistic' view cannot be destroyed, if it never existed.  'Humanistic' view is not natural.  If it was not taught, it does not exist.  Personally, I would contend that the 'humanistic' view is completely unnatural and is dangerously maladaptive.] -- 'najis' = ritually unclean / impure according to religion eg.     -- dog, pig, semen, faeces, blood, urine, dead things, the infidel, alcohol [comment:  the PC whitewashed Wikipedia version of this entry has left out that the infidel (ie the non believer) is considered 'unclean'.   Wikipedia body of entries is therefore unreliable.] Interviewer mentions: -- Canada:   govt.  trying to speed up rate at which immigrants from Muslim countries enter -- for any culture, there is a limit from how many individuals one may take from different culture and absorb that different culture -- beyond that, you start to have different cultures clash -- West has reached a limit some years ago -- it is at the point of demographic and social experiment of an unprecedented scale -- we cannot afford it -- suggests an in situ assistance response in lieu of mass immigration -- Gulf countries would not accept co-religionist refugees (share culture, share language, share religion) -- by which moral compass is it incumbent upon a culture like Germany to completely alter its culture, while Saudi Arabia does nothing? -- intelligentsia driven by cultural and moral relativism -- Denmark repatriation program:  voluntary / immigrants get money to leave -- however, they then move back to Denmark again & are not expected to pay back the money given [Comment:  the West is doomed.  Any culture that is that stupid probably deserves to be swallowed whole.] Reform of scriptures discussed -- refer to 'illegal' acts (beating women, beheading, religiously taking over the world, eradicating Jews mentioned) -- therefore many parts would have to be removed to make it legal to practice in West -- Austria can only preach in German, in certified version of religious text -- cited as a good start -- a national authority to track sources of radical religion suggested -- However, interviewer not optimistic re scripture reformation (given it is seeking to alter the character or essence of the doctrine etc) Interviewer considers immigration open on basis that 100% Western values prevail -- end -- The Danish guy seems overly laid back and optimistic about Western Europe's capabilities to effect change to shape, or curb, the undesirable consequences of mass immigration.  If you look at how Denmark has handled failed voluntary repatriation, it's obvious that those at the top in Europe are completely ineffectual, either due to incompetence or intent. I'm more onboard with the interviewer's views, except that I don't think mass non-European immigration of any kind (whether ideologically onboard with the prevailing culture or not) is a rational choice.   Imagine filling Japan with Italians, Russians, Swedes, Germans and Englishmen, to the point where something like 15% or more of Japan is European.  Even if all these Europeans outwardly observed Japanese culture, they are *not* Japanese, will never be Japanese, and would inevitably alter the composition and character of Japan.  So how would this be a desirable outcome for the Japanese? It sounds like Europe is in dire straits and Canada is also voluntarily heading that way (irrespective of the mountain of evidence that supports heading in the opposite direction), as the Canadian government pursues a fast-track mass immigration policy.  The Canadian government is therefore grossly negligent. What I cannot comprehend is why.  Why would anybody wish to irreversibly alter the character of their societies, transforming their nations into something that is polarised, contentious, splintered, problematic and, ultimately, an existential threat to the host populations? Who wakes up and doesn't want Canada Canadian, Scotland Scottish, Denmark Danish, Sweden Swedish, Italy Italian or Germany German? That just doesn't make any sense to me.

Sweden - Shengen Suspended - Sweden Cuts Railway to Denmark / Passport Controls Reinstated

ꕤ Article SOURCE https://archive.is/pWuc0#selection-4665.0-4665.41 TRANSLATION FROM GERMAN 2015-12-22T08: 21: 17.000 + 0100 Swedish Railways cuts train to Denmark Because of the high number of asylum seekers Sweden has introduced passport control again. The railroad has but to not have the capacity. Therefore, the train from Denmark is simply all set. [Comment:  Swedish government has put the onus on public transport to ID passengers, but public transport hasn't the capacity to do so.  Hence public transport companies are suspending transport to and from Denmark (where those that are seeking to enter Sweden awiat).] The Swedish State Railways has announced a halt to the passenger of Denmark in the country. The reason the company SJ stated on Monday that it was unable, as requested by the government in Stockholm to check the identity of all passengers entering the country to Sweden. The controls aimed at curbing the influx of migrants. This year, in Sweden 150,000 asylum-seekers arrived. The government has therefore temporarily disengaged from the Schengen agreement on freedom of movement and passing a law that prescribes the identity checks on all public transport. From January 4, all transport companies have to reckon with penalties if they bring passengers without an identity document with photo to the country. The railway said it had no capacity for such controls. Therefore they put a passenger until a workable solution is found. The company Öresundståg serving a commuter service between Sweden and Denmark, also said it would reduce from 4 January to traffic during rush hour, in order to have sufficient time for the control of persons. Reuters / RCT Here even say immigrants "It is too much" A third of the population in Södertälje are Iraqis and Syrians. The refugee crisis scares them. They fear that the small city can cope with any additional migrants. Some even choose the right. https://archive.is/pWuc0#selection-4665.0-4665.41 *That company name Öre sund ståg (translates to 'penny good/wholesome stay' (unless something's wrong with Google Translate)  ... lol ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Wow, this is big news and very unlike Sweden, which is at the forefront of accepting and promoting mass immigration and at the forefront of not giving a stuff about security and other issues this immigration results in. I'm going to guess that this more than just about numbers.  What's the bet that there's a terrorist scare? There's got to be if they're doing all that non-PC passport checking in a country that doesn't bother to contain and control third world immigration -- even those it plans to deport (see IKEA murders). Shengen Agreement for anyone who wants to do some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Agreement It's a neocon's wet dream and working class and security nightmare (in the better to do countries). Expires 2016, I think.  I've not ready closely. ꕤ

Denmark - Venstre Party (ie 'Left' for 'Liberal' | Not Socialist)

DENMARK names: eg Lars Løkke Rasmussen eg Anders Fogh Rasmussen Middle names - eg 'Fogh' and 'Løkke' denote mother's family name and do not normally form part of the name / used in press to distinguish the Danes, who all seem to have the same names ... (I think, lol) Venstre (Denmark) Founded as part of a peasants' movement against the landed aristocracy Blue Bloc (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti) ie English: Left, Denmark's Liberal Party Therefore: Venstre = 'left' TODAY  the 'Venstre' (for 'left') reference is to: liberalism NOT socialism f. 1870 then name: Det Forenede Venstre (The United Left) 1895–1910 then known as Venstrereformpartiet (Left Reform Party) opponents, Højre (Right) forerunner of the present-day Conservative People's Party advocated for established interests, esp.  Church of Denmark & the landed gentry Distinction b/w  concepts of Venstre (Left, ie party bearing name) venstrefløj (left wing / socialist & other left-leaning parties) TODAY Venstre advocates an economically liberal pro-free market ideology the major party of the centre-right in Denmark third largest party Venstre party has produced many Prime Ministers governed from 2001 to 2011 as the major partner in a coalition w/ Conservative People's Party with support from the Danish People's Party 2015 parliamentary elections Venstre / Blue Bloc received 19.5% of vote 34 out of 179 seats won a tight election party came THIRD overall winning Lars Løkke Rasmussen ability to form a govt PARTY LEADER Venstre = Lars Løkke Rasmussen = IN OFFICE appointed PRIME MINISTER of DENMARK (fm 28 June 2015) Was PREVIOUS Prime Minister Apr 2009 to Oct 2011 / law degree was president of the youth branch of Venstre ie 1986 to 1989, prior to obtaining law degree Since 2001 Venstre enacted a "tax stop" to halt the growth in taxes seen during previous eight years under Social Democrats 2010 Rasmussen's govt = major spending cuts and measures designed = unemployment insurance (unemployment benefit cut from max of 4 years to 2) Take over from: Anders Fogh Rasmussen former leader Venstre Prime Minister of Denmark from 27 Nov 2001 to 5 Apr 2009 AFR - Appointed Secretary General of NATO in 2009 Fogh Rasmussen in favour of centralisation privatisation limiting the size of govt relied on Danish People's Party for support, keeping Danish tradition of minority govt Fogh Rasmussen was a strident critic of the welfare state 1990s, his views moved towards the political centre His government introduced tougher limits on non European Economic Area (EEA) immigration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venstre_%28Denmark%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lars_L%C3%B8kke_Rasmussen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Fogh_Rasmussen ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- ꕤ

Denmark - Lars Vilks, artist Sweden, receives award for promoting free speech

LARS VILKS Free Press Society Denmark Lars Vilks, artist Sweden, receives award from Danish association promoting free speech,  Trykkefrihedsselskabet ('Press Freedom Society' - a more direct translation?) http://www.thelocal.se/20150315/cartoonist-lars-vilks-in-first-public-appearance-since-copenhagen-attacks Trykkefrihedsselskabet assoc. prior free speech awards to: >Kurt Westergaard cartoonist >editor Flemming Rose, Jyllands-Posten trykkefrihed = trykke frihed = press freedom known as:   Free Press Society f. 2004 in Denmark "Without freedom of speech, no free society." Article caught my eye, as I knew that Lars Vilks has been in hiding for years, under police protection in Sweden, which struck me as an absolutely insane way for him to have to live  ...  ... and I think he was also the target of the recent Copenhagen attack (yes, it sure looks like it - or the event was). More on Lars Vilks - here. The Wikipedia entry on Vilks discusses the Copenhagen attack in the most recent subsection, going into detail about the Copenhagen cafe event arrangements and who attended. However, while the entry (which contains an overhead link to a separate entry on the Copenhagen attack) states that gunman (who killed 'one civilian' and wounded three policemen), was subsequently killed by police, the Vilks entry has left out shocking and important details relevant to Vilks and the Copenhagen attack, by not plainly stating that the following took place: Film director Finn Noergaard, 55, was killed yesterday at a cafe. Hours later, security employee Dan Uzan, 37, was shot in the head as he stood outside a building belonging to the city's Great Synagogue. [1] The gunman, Omar El-Hussein, later shot dead a Jewish man outside a synagogue before he was killed by police. [2] Seriously, how hard is it (a) name the gunman and (b) key in the names of the two dead victims? Maybe less focus on who organised and attended a cafe event and a bit more attention paid to the people that were murdered would have made for a more sensible entry on the subject of the Vilks Copenhagen attack subsection, irrespective of the overhead link-to provision in the entry. It's not as if the relevant information wasn't available, as the citation link is to the Daily Mail article which contains names. When key points are left out of entries, I think it damages confidence in the source (Wikipedia) and makes for an inferior information repository, even if there is links to other sections.  It just looks really shifty excluding information that is key and information that has a lot of impact. More on the Vilks latest event: Israel National News: Cartoonist Makes First Public Appearance Since Copenhagen Attack http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/192608

Telesurtv Interview - Assange - The Lastest

Telesurtv Interview FULL ARTICLE @ SOURCE http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/An-Obvious-and-Conspicuous-Injustice-says-Assange-on-Asylum-20150314-0002.html An 'Obvious and Conspicuous' Injustice, says Assange on Asylum Published 14 March 2015 (15 hours 31 minutes ago) In an exclusive interview with teleSUR, Julian Assange talks ... [ ... EDIT ... ] CS: On the topic of your asylum, tell me about the larger context of the U.S. investigation into WikiLeaks?    JA: Well I had already had a number of run-ins and legal cases with big banks and the U.S. government before. Our publications beginning 2010 set off a major conflict with the U.S. government. As a result, the U.S. started up what it calls a whole government investigation, involving more than a dozen different U.S. agencies that is believed to be the largest ever investigation into a publisher. As the investigation has gone by, the competition between the different agencies over who is leading it has clarified. Now leading it is the Department of Justice National Security Division, the Department of Justice Criminal Division and the FBI as the sort of boots on the ground. [DoJ Nat Sec + Crim Div & FBI] A lot of information has come out over time about the U.S. formally admitting court filings in February, just over a week ago, that is a multi-subject, ongoing, long-term, investigation and other findings saying that WikiLeaks is the central target of that investigation, not Chelsea Manning, who has already been dealt with. This is not an investigation that is simply confined to the United States. The different agencies involved include the National Security Agency, the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The CIA and DIA, that is publicly admitted. The NSA, that is in the Snowden documents and also other records that came out from the Pentagon. According to Snowden records I was placed on an NSA manhunt list in 2010. But we know that the U.S. military intelligence was spying on me from 2009 onwards in Germany. The FBI has conducted its activities in Europe, in Iceland and Denmark; the U.S. military intelligence in Germany; and the FBI also in the UK; and U.S. and-or Swedish intelligence in Sweden. As time has gone by we have gone from a position of defense in these cases to offense. Which I have been able to do really to the thanks of the asylum of the embassy, since it is a static situation now [inside the Ecuadorean embassy] we can plan a bit more. We have filed criminal cases now against the U.S. intelligence activities in Germany where U.S. military intelligence came off their bases in Wiesbaden and went down to Berlin to spy on me and one of my friends, Jeremy Zimmerman, who runs a freedom of the press outfit in Paris. The criminal case in Denmark last year, in relation to the unlawful FBI actions against us in Europe. The FBI sent a secret private jet over to Iceland where they had recruited an informant for the U.S. embassy in Iceland. The Icelandic government found out about it, that they did it without authority, and told [the U.S.] to get out. They [the U.S.], then smuggled the informant around a number of different hotels around Iceland interrogating him. Eventually they were kicked out of the country by the interior minister. They then took that informant, who was being paid, to Washington DC, and interrogated him for another five days and engaged in various plans to try and get that informant to steal hard drives from England, and engaged in cash transfers and other interrogations with him — he did at least two — so that is the subject of another criminal complaint in Demark in relation to the FBI in Denmark, and the illicit cash payments that occurred to that informant. So that is most aspects of the criminal case in the United States. Something important came out early this year in relation to Google. The U.S. government subpoenas all information that Google had — email, search terms, etc. — from three of our journalists: Sarah Harrison, Kristinn Hrafnsson and Joseph Farrell. These subpoenas were important. Not only did they place Google under gag orders, but the subpoenas revealed a sort of legal attack that the U.S. government is making on media and on WikiLeaks. So their defense is that they are investigating — which add up to 45 years in prison — espionage, conspiracy to commit espionage, computer hacking, general conspiracy, theft of U.S. government information. [*An attack on ALL media, not just WikiLeaks.] These charges are very interesting because they are sort of like crossing the spectrum of different charge types. They are trying many, many different ways to attack the organization and me using conspiracy on the one hand but also non-espionage charges that make it easier to extradite people, and you can see a little bit like that, that just happened in a case in Canada where they extradited someone for a non-conspiracy related charge successfully even though he claimed asylum in relation to his espionage investigation.  [Matt de Hart  [Link 1] & [Link 2]] The two conspiracy charges are detail. But lets put this back into the global context about what is going on. WikiLeaks does not publish in the United States. WikiLeaks is not registered in the United States. WikiLeaks is a publisher in a variety of jurisdictions: Iceland, France, at one time Sweden. So how is it that the United States is claiming jurisdiction to prosecute us for these offenses. What the U.S. is claiming is that any information about the United States gives it jurisdiction and if we publish information that came from the U.S. government, therefore it has jurisdiction to prosecute publishers that exist outside the United States, because of their connection. Now, the way journalists and publishers work is that some journalists get something from a source and then communicate it to other journalists in the organization; the editors and subeditors, the publisher, the distributor, the tech guys, and so on. What the U.S. government is saying is that this flow of information, that occurred within WikiLeaks as a media organization, is a conspiracy. So they have worked out a way to embroil an entire media organization in the U.S. jurisdiction based on any information coming in through one journalist working for that media organization. So it is a territorial grab by the United States to say that they can go after any media organization anywhere in the world that publishes information that they say is classified; not even classified actually… That they say has been derived from someone in the United States — a government worker doing something that they should not have — that is enough. If they allege one crime in the United States, some government worker that cannot handle classified information properly, or something else, and that circulates to others in a media organization that use that to go after the whole media organization. So it is really quite a serious threat to global media scrutiny of U.S. wars and U.S. spying. CS: So in this larger context, what does the Swedish investigation represent?    JA: The U.S. investigation was already on foot. Without wanting to go into the details of the Swedish investigation, which are well documented on justice4assange.com, the Swedes started their investigation and then dropped it, and then started it again, and then in the context of us just about to publish Cabelgate, put out an Interpol red notice for this preliminary investigation with no charges and kept it going ever since. The women in the case say to the courts that they did not want any such investigation. But the government took this up anyway. So it is quite a strange case and is being used as a PR stick and it has trapped me here in the UK. So whenever we talk about what is going on in the U.S. case and how serious that is, the PR attack says “oh no, no, no. That is about some Swedish sex case.” That has been a tremendous distraction. Formally the Swedes say that it is a quote “preliminary investigation” un-quote. I have not been charged and there has been nothing done in that preliminary investigation for four years and the Swedish authorities admit it. Now it seems likely that the preliminary investigation will dissipate within the next year. But the UK has said that even if that happens they are going to arrest me anyway and you also have the U.S. case. CS: Is there anything you want to say or add about your 1000 days of asylum generally?    JA: It has been a difficult 1000 days. Not so much for me but for my family. For me, I have plenty of things to concentrate on that are not in the embassy. I have an organization to run. We have a dozen different court actions across the world. As time has gone by the legal and political situation has clarified, such that it has become an obvious and conspicuous injustice. That view is now the dominant view in Sweden, the United Kingdom and many other countries always had that view but these two countries are involved in a concrete way. The United States is a bit harder. Although there has been very hostile rhetoric in the United States — calling for my assassination, calling for WikiLeaks to be listed as a terrorist organization, calling for bills presented before congress to define me and all my staff as enemy combatants who can be killed and kidnapped at will — the U.S. is a large enough country that we do have a fair run in a number of U.S. media outlets; some of the small ones nearly all the time. But even the largest, even Fox News, occasionally. So we have a spectrum of support in the United States not always able to express itself, but sometimes it is and I think that is quite a hopeful sign when you consider the amount of demonization that has occurred from the national security state in the U.S. Here in the United Kingdom, as a result of my case, they changed the law last year to say that there should be no more extradition without charge. That only deals with one charge because we still have the U.S. case to deal with. But there is a growing realization that what is happening here is really unjust. You cannot have someone detained in Europe without charge for four-and-a half years. Everyone can see that there is something wrong with that. [UK change in law re extradition without charge would (I think) no longer apply, as Conservatives have pushed through adoption of EAW legislation that becomes effective by default (or something like that); and that legislation, as I understand, takes precedence over domestic laws.  Anyway, that's how I understood what was going on.  But maybe this needs another look-up.] Julian Assange is founder and editor-and-chief of WikiLeaks.  FULL ARTICLE @ SOURCE http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/An-Obvious-and-Conspicuous-Injustice-says-Assange-on-Asylum-20150314-0002.html EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT Jacob Rees-Mogg on May's European Arrest Warrant claims JACOB REES-MOGG says:  after 1st of December, how EAW is implemented will not be decided by Britain; it will be decided by Court of Justice of the European Union.  So who can arrest British citizens will be ceded to Brussels.  COMMENT So that's a round-up of what's going on. Operation Get-Assange / WikiLeaks in summary: Beginning 2010 WikiLeaks publishing:  set off a major conflict with USG. USG whole govt investigation. More than a dozen different US Largest ever investigation into a publisher. Leading the investigation - Department of Justice: > National Security Division > Criminal Division > FBI boots on the ground. Multi-subject, ongoing, long-term, investigation WikiLeaks central target Not confined to the United States. Agencies involved incl. > National Security Agency (NSA) > CIA > Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) -  *CIA + DIA is publicly admitted (Snowden docs & Pentagon records) Activities: > NSA manhunt list in 2010 - Assange > US military intelligence spying on Assange - from 2009 onwards, Germany > FBI conducted its activities in Europe:  Iceland + Denmark + UK > US and/or Swedish intelligence conducted its activities in Sweden This investigation doesn't just affect WikiLeaks; it affects all journalists and publishers and, apparently, the US is aiming for worldwide jurisdiction (which is ridiculous ... unless you're an Evil Empire.)

ISRAEL - Miscellaneous

ISRAEL Denmark / EU Trade Agreement #Denmark foreign Minister Martin Lidegaard says time to reconsider Denmark's & EU's Trade Agreements with Israel http://goo.gl/2nMuP8 >> ie Cairo Gaza peace talks - If peace talks don't result in serious concessions from the Israelis “Lidegaard wants to see Israel commit to ending its eight-year blockade of Gaza and stop its “illegal settlements”. The foreign minister is also calling on Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza to lay down their weapons. “ “Opposition parties the Conservatives and the Danish People's Party immediately spoke out against the threat of sanctions, while the trade minister, Mogens Jensen, told Jyllands-Posten that sanctions should only be considered with a broad international backing. “  [ http://www.thelocal.dk/20140922/fm-calls-for-tougher-approach-to-israel ] Mossad #Israel >>> Mossad has it's own YouTube channel ... & is on a recruitment drive >> http://goo.gl/iswOSA   VIDEO >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&list=UUDRnbEnhND3zNvduaI4ruew&v=qX9ZoKO1H8E … Cybersecurity #Israel / creating new #cybersecurity authority/alleged #Iran attacks / increase in co-op b/w govt agencies, bus. & in civilian sector /RIA Obituary | Mossad  #Israel Mossad spy Mike Harari 87 died in Tel Aviv - http://goo.gl/uz1slD-  Operation Wrath of God - 'Black September' group - 1972 Munich Olympics >> reported to have had close relations with #Panama dictator Manuel Noriega / arms trade Noriega | Panama Manuel Noriega - military dictator of #Panama from 1983 to 1989 / invasion by USA / He's been to COUP SCHOOL! School of the Americas [wiki]  >#Panama > Noriega worked with CIA from the late 1950s until the 1980s/  Medellín Cartel /  Pablo Escobar / 'narcokleptocracy' >> George H. W. Bush, former CIA director / Vice President 1981-89 (President 1989-93 /close friend of Noriega [wikipedia] Reagan bypass Congress / NSC / Iran-Contra Affair of 1986–1987, facilitated contra funding thru proceeds of arms sales to #Iran! >officer Lt. Col. Oliver North in charge "The Enterprise"/+ govt  agencies, esp. from CIA in Central Am./no govt accountability http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contras Hey, there's a #UN watch: "UN Watch, an Israel-linked group that monitors the multinational body for compliance to the UN charter." [Times of Israel] http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1313899/k.948D/Issues_in_Focus.htm COMMENT The stuff about Noriega, CIA, bypassing Congress, sale of arms to Iran and secretly financing Contra just blew me away. I've vaguely heard of Black September but didn't know what it was about.  Thought it was related to a foiled airport bombing in Italy. It's cool that there's someone watching the UN.

ASSANGE - LAB RESULTS

http://assangeinswedenbook.com/2013/07/01/the-lab-results/ The Lab Results These are the lab results presented to Chief Inspector Mats Gehlin on Monday 25 October 2010. Gehlin had submitted two condoms to the state crime lab SKL ...  exactly two months earlier, which was quite the feat, as one came from Sofia Wilén  – even though Chief Inspector Eva Finné, who was in charge of both Sofia Wilén and Anna Ardin’s cases at the time, had demonstratively closed the more serious part relating to Wilén, stating that ‘no crime had been committed’; and she expressly ordered Gehlin to keep his ‘hands off’.  Nonetheless, Gehlin submitted Wilén’s condom under Ardin’s case number. [Chief Inspector Mats Gehlin] had NOT asked the lab to check for DNA, only to see if they could determine how the condoms had been torn. But they did a DNA test anyway, and came up with some rather shattering results, results the Swedish media have done their best to hide from the citizenry ever since. The condom submitted by Anna Ardin showed no traces whatsoever of chromosomal (genomic) DNA – meaning the condom cannot have been used for sex. [ ...] [ FURTHER] SKL A conversation with SKL yielded the following. The condom from the residence of complainant 2 [Ardin] had no traces of DNA. Vaginal swabs from complainant 1 [Wilén] had DNA from complainant 1 [Wilén] and a man.

COMMENT

This was floating around on Twitter, so I thought I'd check it out.

Wasn't expecting condom pics.  Bonus condom pics @ the link above!  LOL

 

Anyway, 'no traces of DNA' (re Complainant 2 - Ardin) is pretty conclusive.

The Complainant 1 (Wilén) DNA -- re 'a man' is, what?  Could be from anywhere?  But, regardless, this is the matter that was dismissed.

I'm not entirely clear on this stuff, but given that Chief Inspector Eva Finné had:

demonstratively closed the more serious part relating to Wilén, stating that ‘no crime had been committed’

one wonders why Chief Inspector Mats Gehlin would go against express orders of Chief Inspector Eva Finné -- and why the dismissed Complainant 1 (Wilén) matter was even joined to the Complainant 2 (Ardin)  matter (the zero DNA evidence).

The entire thing sounds super dodgy to me.

The justice system in Sweden sounds a complete nightmare.  

Surprising.  Sweden has this image of being a 'human rights' protector - well, it did in my mind.  That's well and truly been dispelled.  Sweden's a violator of human rights by the look of it  (Assange, Warg & populations impacted by oil companies in Africa).

Sweden's screwed Gottfrid Svartholm Warg (Swedish Pirate Bay co-founder).  

Warg's on trial right now in Denmark.  The guy was kidnapped from Cambodia or somewhere on what sounds like trumped up charges of hacking.

Is anybody else creeped out by all this stuff?

UKRAIN - NATO - ANDERS FOGH-RASMUSSEN - LEHMANN ARTICLE

24.08.2014 Author: Christof Lehmann NATO’s Summit in Wales: Why Anders Fogh-Rasmussen? Column: Politics Region: USA in the World NATO will hold its 2014 summit in Wales under Secretary-General Anders Fogh-Rasmussen in September. The summit will be held against the backdrop of a widening Middle East war and the war in Ukraine. A profile of Anders Fogh-Rasmussen suggests that he was chosen with NATO’s eastward expansion and the ”containment” of Russia in mind, even at the risk of a European or global war.  Anders Fogh-Rasmussen spoke to journalists in Denmark on August 15 and stressed that the Alliance would focus on its readiness to deal with the full range of threats and with NATO’s readiness. He said ”we will adopt a Readiness Action Plan to make ourselves faster and more agile”. He added that NATO leaders planned to strengthen NATO’s partners and their institutions. Fogh-Rasmussen underlined that the success of NATO would depend on all Allies investing adequately in security and defense, especially given by the new security climate created by Russia’s illegal actions in Ukraine. ”Security is like insurance: to have the best insurance you have to pay premium. We are now facing a new security situation, and the premium has gone up”, he said. Fogh-Rasmussen, a Dane, praised Denmark for its always present readiness to contribute and added operations in Afghanistan, Kosovo and Libya as examples for ”NATO’s collective defense”. The statement is breathtaking, considering that NATO’s 25th summit in Chicago, in 2012, concluded that NATO operations in Libya in 2011 were ”a teachable moment and model for future interventions”. This interpretation of NATO’s role in Libya stands in stark contrast, to how it was perceived by the then Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Russia, and many other UN member states. During a joint press conference with the then Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen in Copenhagen, Putin stressed that NATO had overstepped its authorization via UN Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya. The atmosphere between Putin and Lars Løkke Rasmussen was visibly tense. Adding to the tensions was probably, that Putin has a KGB background and must have known that Lars Løkke Rasmussen raised millions for the ”mujahedeen” and other US/NATO creations in Afghanistan during the 1980s. Another one who would probably say ”not so fast” to NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s statement about NATO premium insurance policy is the Russian Ambassador to NATO, Vitaly Grutchko. After the collapse of Russia – EU negotiations over the Third EU Energy Package, at a meeting in Brussels in 2013, Grutchko said ”Someone here in Brussels made the most profound point by saying that if you are holding a hammer, you should not think that every emerging problem is a nail. We think that the world has ample opportunity to engage in energy cooperation and to ensure energy security without making use of military-political organizations as instruments”. Analysts had by that time warned for a year that the failure of NATO’s strategy in Syria had made a NATO provoked war in Ukraine as predictable as a clockwork. The appointment of a NATO Secretary-General helps forecast NATO long-term planning. One example? In 1987 NATO appointed the former German Defense Minister Manfred Wörner. The appointment of Wörner was followed by the German reunification in 1990. On December 26, 1991, the Soviet Union was dissolved. Wörner, Germany, and inner-German, German – Czechoslovakian and especially German-Russian relations were crucial elements to these developments. Wörner died from intestinal cancer at the age of 59 in 1994. Wörner was known to be skeptic with regards to NATO’s eastward expansion. Denmark and Fogh-Rasmussen should come to play crucial roles in tying the former Soviet Republics in the Baltic, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania to the European Union and to NATO. Anders Fogh-Rasmussen served as Danish PM between November 27, 2001 and April 5, 2009. Centuries of close ties between the Baltic States and Denmark were crucial. In the post 9/11 climate and the Global War on Terror, Fogh-Rasmussen had come to prove that he was willing to engage Danish troops in an illegal war in Iraq. Moreover, the Danish courts rejected Danish plaintiffs who wanted Fogh-Rasmussen charged on these grounds, saying that they had no standing in court. Because it’s so great to be on the winning team. Danish loyalty towards NATO was relatively easy to forecast, also for historical reasons. Danes are all to aware of the fact that Denmark got ”a free ride” when Germany was defeated in WWII. Historical archives show that the then Danish Foreign Minister Peter Munch had a secret meeting with the German Reichführer ( Leader of the Realm) Heinrich Himmler in Rostock. The meeting took place in the weeks before the ”German invasion”. Munch’s son was known to be pedophile and the young man could risk jail or worse if he fell into the hands of a German prosecutor. Records which could have proven that Munch was blackmailed have in part be burned, others remain classified to this day. Danish forces mounted only symbolic resistance when German troops initiated operation “Weserübung” and occupied Denmark and Norway to “secure their neutrality”. The Danish flag was flown during the 2014 D-Day celebrations; Not for the State but because the effort of Danish sailors during the war. The Danish historian Niels Wium Olesen noted that those Danes who knew about it probably perceived it as”a pleasant misunderstanding”, because its ”so great to be on the winning team”. The appointment of Fogh-Rasmussen was a clear signal for NATO’s eastwards expansion, in breach with the terms agreed upon before the German reunification. That is, no NATO troops in any of the former Soviet republics or Warsaw Treaty member states. The summit in Wales: Rockefeller money vs. continental European consensus – War or Peace? The 2014 NATO summit in Wales will be held against the backdrop of an unprecedented risk for open war between NATO and Russia or the CSTO. Fogh-Rasmussen stressed that the insurance premium has gone up. He omits that core NATO members, especially the USA, UK, with almost absolute loyalty from Denmark, manufactured the wars in Libya and Syria since 2007; the war in Iraq since 2000 or before, and the war in Ukraine since 2012. Denmark and Anders Fogh-Rasmussen were the perfect choice ”because it’s so great to be on the winning team”. Fogh-Rasmussen’s term as NATO Secretary-General and the current conflict in Ukraine combined, raise principle questions: Who benefits from almost pathologically obsessive, Rockefeller-money-supported policy-makers like Zbigniev Brzezinski. In his latest book “Strategic Vision”, the Obama administration adviser argues that the Russia of Putin must be contained and isolated, that Turkey shall play a crucial role for NATO in the Middle East. Psychologically trained observers would assure that Brzezinski is obsessed with dividing Russia into independent republics and then to tie Moscow to a continental Europe under US/UK hegemony.  [So it's a US/UK empire ... Europe a province?] Who benefits from throwing a spanner into Russian – continental European relations and the provocation of a third, great European war over an subversively-created lack of convergence in EU – Russian energy-security requirements? Will a growing continental European consensus against bellicose policy, driven by Washington and London, reach sufficient momentum to prevent a worst case scenario? Fogh-Rasmussen’s preamble to the NATO summit in Wales spells war rather than peace. It will be one of the most crucial summits the Alliance has held since it was established in 1949. Dr. Christof Lehmann an independent political consultant on conflict and conflict resolution and the founder and editor in chief of nsnbc, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. source: Journal-Neo.Org

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI - US geostrategist - wikipedia link.

*A wealth of information in this article by Dr Christof Lehmann.