Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Mike Pomepo
Incumbent: Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
prior: U.S. Representative for Kansas's 4th congressional district, 2011-17
prior: member of TEA PARTY MOVEMENT, within REPUBLICAN PARTY
origins: Santa Ana, California
majored in mechanical engineering
subsequently serving in the Army as an Armor Branch cavalry officer from 1986 to 1991
J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review
worked as a lawyer for Williams & Connolly
>> served his last tour in the Gulf War <<
Pompeo founded Thayer Aerospace and Private Security (now NEXT-TECH AEROSPACE)
/ interest sold 2006
POMPEO - >> President of Sentry International, an oilfield equipment company <<
Pompeo honored the SAUDI ARABIA Crown Prince Muhammad bin Nayef with the CIA's "George Tenet" Medal.
>> first reaffirmation of ties between the Islamic monarchy and United States since President Trump took office
2013, Pompeo introduced the Natural Gas Pipeline Permitting Reform Act (H.R. 1900; 113th Congress)
>> bill placed a 12-month deadline on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, requiring it to approve or reject any proposal for a natural gas pipeline within that timeframe
Pompeo has referred to the Obama Administration's environment and climate change plans as "damaging" and "radical"
Pompeo supports eliminating the Environmental Protection Agency's greenhouse gas registry program
Pompeo signed the Americans for Prosperity's No Climate Tax pledge
Pompeo opposed the Affordable Care Act
Pompeo opposes requiring food suppliers to label food made with genetically modified organisms
Pompeo accused Obama of:
"unforgivably fail[ing] to provide the total commitment of our national means to our servicemen in the field."
JOURNALIST: MICHAEL HASTINGS
see: General McChrystal, forced to submit resignation for having made negative comments about Obama to Michael Hastings (1980–2013) - Rolling Stone magazine (The Runaway General)
Hastings died in a fiery high-speed automobile crash on June 18, 2013, in Los Angeles, California ... in a single vehicle automobile crash in his Mercedes C250 Coupé at approximately 4:25 a.m. --Wikipedia
VAULT 7 reveals CIA has been able to hack your car since 2014.
Pompeo supports the National Security Agency's surveillance programs
Pompeo denounced NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's inclusion in the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, and called for Snowden's invitation to speak via telecast at the annual Texas event to be withdrawn, lest it encourage "lawless behavior" among attendees
DEATH SENTENCE 'DUE PROCESS'
2016, Pompeo said Snowden "should be brought back from Russia and given due process, and I think the proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence."
Pompeo:
" ... Legal and bureaucratic impediments to surveillance should be removed. That includes Presidential Policy Directive-28, which bestows privacy rights on foreigners and imposes burdensome requirements to justify data collection."
Pompeo opposes closing Guantánamo Bay detention camp.
2013 visit to the prison, Pompeo said, of the prisoners who were on hunger strike,
"It looked to me like a lot of them had put on weight."
Pompeo has criticized the Obama administration's decision to end the CIA's secret prisons ("black sites") + administration's requirement that all interrogators adhere to anti-torture laws
2017 speech addressing CSIS, Pompeo referred to Wikileaks as "a non-state hostile intelligence service" and described founder Julian Assange as a narcissist, fraud, and coward.
" ... Their mission: personal self-aggrandizement through the destruction of Western values."
COMMENT: the AGENTS of RULING CAPITALIST ELITES ... LOVE TO EXPLOIT notions of >> WESTERN VALUES << - even as these agents of ruling power ACTIVELY & hypocritically violate such crafted notions, that are apparently no more than public manipulation / PR fodder.
POMPEO attended: United States Military Academy (USMA), also known as West Point, Army, The Academy, or simply The Point
/ United States Military Academy - est. 1802
students are officers-in-training and are referred to as "cadets" or collectively as the "United States Corps of Cadets"
most graduates are commissioned as second lieutenants in the Army
/ foreign cadets are commissioned into the armies of their home countries
its ranks include two Presidents of the United States (as well as the President of the Confederate States of America), presidents of Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and the Philippines, numerous famous generals, and seventy-six Medal of Honor recipients
Continental Army first occupied West Point, New York, on 27 January 1778
/ the oldest continuously-operating Army post in the United States
Mexican–American War brought the academy to prominence
During the Gulf War, alumnus General Schwarzkopf was the commander of Allied Forces, and the American senior generals in Iraq, Generals Petraeus, Odierno and Austin, and Afghanistan, retired General Stanley McChrystal and General David Rodriguez, are also alumni.
The literal translation of Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) is: THE FEDERAL NEWS SERVICE.
Bundes = federal
Nachrichten = news
Endienst = service
Similarly, in the CIA under Obama about six (6) years ago, the CIA introduced a change as to how it writes its internal reports to use the same style that journalists use to write articles, called the 'INVERTED PYRAMID STYLE', where you basically put the conclusion up top and then you justify how you got to the conclusion.
So there are similarities between news services and intelligence services.
BUT it ends with what happens with the results of the research.
So, publishers PUBLISH, whereas STATE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES keep the information CONCEALED and USE it for the ADVANTAGE of their organisation, for their particular POLITICAL connections or MILITARIES, for OTHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, and so on.
For the CIA to say that investigative media organisations and publishers are the same as an INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, is as ridiculous as it is to say that the CIA is a MEDIA ORGANISATION.
There are similarities in the sourcing in relation to both, BUT in terms of what the organisations then do with the information is completely different.
DANIEL McADAMS - head of Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
- foreign policy expert
- worked for many years on Capitol Hill
- worked as an election monitor in eastern Europe
It seems like the use of the term - it's a term of ART - I don't think [POMPEO] used it to demonise; I think he used it to CATEGORISE, to create a NEW CATEGORY out of thin air, that would enable the US government to go after WikiLeaks in a much more military sort of way.
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
Yes, absolutely.
DANIEL McADAMS - head of Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
- foreign policy expert
- worked for many years on Capitol Hill
- worked as an election monitor in eastern Europe
As the ACLU noted, never has a publisher in the history of the United States been prosecuted for revealing truthful information.
So it seems to me that the key is to REMOVE THE IDEA that you're a PUBLISHER and call you something different.
And I think the battlefield right now is probably in US PUBLIC OPINION: turn that first against WikiLeaks and then see what happens.
Does that make sense?
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
I think POMPEO's speech came about partly as a response to an OpEd I wrote for THE WASHINGTON POST, [discussing] why WikiLeaks does its work and so on.
It might have been coming anyway.
He was in LONDON the day before and on the Wednesday he then returned to the UNITED STATES; he gave this SPEECH late on a Thursday evening, before Easter Friday.
It was actually quite hard to respond to in the media.
And, from that kind of media analysis point of view, it was well timed.
The CIA has been deeply humiliated as a result of our ongoing VAULT 7 publications.
So this is a pre-emptive move by the CIA to try and discredit our publications and create a new category for WikiLeaks and other national security reporters to STRIP them of FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS, by defining the organisation as something that fits into existing interpretations: so, you can surveil and engage in certain actions on "HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES".
That's throughout different pieces of US regulation, that you don't need search warrants and so on authorised by a judge, if what you're intercepting or surveilling is connected to an organisation that is an "INTELLIGENCE SERVICE" that is influencing someone.
So, to CREATE this NEW CATEGORY of "NON-STATE INTELLINGENCE SERVICE" can then be very easily applied to ANY MEDIA ORGANISATION - "NON-STATE", of course means commercial organsation or a non-profit organsation.
I think it's a long-termstrategy.
It's taking two bites of the apple:
1. to REDEFINE MEDIA as "NON-STATE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES";
2. to use a perverse JURISDICTIONAL ARGUMENT, which is to say that all foreign reporters have no FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
Of course, the FIRST AMENDMENT is not a positive right.
It doesn't, generally speaking, give [ASSANGE] or, in fact, anyone else, a positive right; it's an obligation to the government to give ... a right: it's a LIMITATION ON THE GOVERNMENT that LIMITS its ability to INTERFERE with FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION or of the PRESS, in order to create the necessary environment of PUBLIC DEBATE which can STOP AUTOCRACY developing within the UNITED STATES.
I've seen a lot of misleading assumptions by even some of our supporters - a lot on the kind of nationalist right - going: well, look,we all like you, but, of course, the US CONSTITUTION does not apply to you in AUSTRALIA and in LONDON.
That completely misreads it.
The US CONSTITUTION applies to the CIA in Langley, Virginia, and every US GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE and all the ACTIONS that they might take in relation to actions initiated against WIKILEAKS.
And, of course, WIKILEAKS has lots of AMERICAN EMPLOYEES - we're a GLOBAL ORGANISATION, etc.
RON PAUL:
The other thing POMPEO was doing - and we've touched on this - that because you're not an AMERICAN CITIZEN, you don't have the rights.
But our constitution wasn't written to protect CITIZENS; it's for the persons who are exposed to our COURTS.
And, therefore, this accusation that you have no rights, you're not even an American citizen and therefore you don't qualify, I think a lot of people believe that AND THAT HAS TO BE REFUTED.
The other charge that they've been throwing out - and I'm sure you've answered to this already, but I think it's important because I don't know whether it's just propaganda on their part or they think that they can get somewhere - but that you're 'different' than THE WASHINGTON POST and the NEW YORK TIMES; [that] you're not a PUBLISHER because you're a participant in obtaining this information, and they've thrown that out there.
But I just want to hear how you answer that charge.
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
Well, it's completely FALSE.
They've tried this in the trial of CHELSEA MANNING in 2013, and it failed; it was NOT accepted by the MILITARY COURTS.
They attempted to use it in order to get an extra charge up against the then BRADLEY MANNING (now CHELSEA MANNING), and did not succeed, and the evidence that they tried to present was really pitiful.
It was that in 2009, WikiLeaks had a web page, and on that web page we had collected nominations from police, private investigators, journalists etc, about what kind of documents they'd be most interested in seeing come to the public.
That was called the "WIKILEAKS MOST WANTED 2009".
It wasn't something that we had asserted that 'we' wanted; it was collecting a list of what other people said that THEY wanted and, of course, that included all sorts of documents - and the US government argued that there was one of the types of documents that was on that page, CHELSEA MANNING has subsequently leaked to us and therefore this was some kind of 'conspiracy'.
So, it's really very indirect and didn't stand up in the case.
But, of course, the average NATIONAL SECURITY REPORTER is engaged in a MUCH CLOSER RELATIONSHIP with their SOURCES, cultivating them over a long period of time, speaking to them - when a source says, "You know, I heard that this terrible thing happened ... "; and then the reporter goes: "Well, that's interesting. But can you prove it? Do you have a document about it?"
So, POMPEO - and it looks like the DOJ [Dept. of Justice] - is trying to REDEFINE that kind of conversation that occurs every day between journalists and their sources, as 'conspiracy' to commit 'espionage' and therefore OUTLAW it.
DANIEL McADAMS - head of Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
- foreign policy expert
- worked for many years on Capitol Hill
- worked as an election monitor in eastern Europe
Julian, you mentioned earlier on, the strange coincidence of the new assault on WikiLeaks with the VAULT 7 releases.
Why is the CIA so upset about these VAULT 7 releases?
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
Well, go back for a little while.
You know, in the DEMOCRATICALLY ALIGNED PRESS, like THE WASHINGTON POST and CNN, this assault on us by the CIA and, apparently, the DOJ [Dept. of Justice], is being FRAMED as a TRUMP ADMINISTRATION initiative, but the reality is that this was going on under OBAMA for YEARS AND YEARS.
That's why I have ASYLUM here. There was a PENTAGON WAR ROOM of more than 120 people - publicly admitted - operating 24/7, back in 2010; and then a very large FBI inquiry: spraying out search warrants; trying to install informers; bribing people; flying people to Washington; [FBI] flying ILLICITLY plane-loads of FBI officers to ICELAND to interrogate people, etc.
Extremely large.
Now, because of the POLITICAL RELATIONSHIP that the DEMOCRATS have with their base, by about two thousand and ... not long after I had asylum - so about mid 2012, they perceived that it did not benefit them POLITICALLY to talk the case up.
But a lot was happening beneath the surface and continued to happen.
Now this new REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION, perhaps because of the nature of the Republican base and because of the rhetorical assaults about them being approximate to RUSSIA, have now decided that it benefits them POLITICALLY to TALK UP the conflicts with WIKILEAKS and the DOJ [Dept. of Justice].
So that's why it's been raised up so much.
The other reason is, yes, the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) and the VAULT 7 publications.
Well, we have published previous documents about the CIA.
But only only, you know, maybe ten (10) or twenty (20) documents previously.
It's very rare to see an actual fresh document leaked from the CIA, with CIA letterhead. Extremely rare.
There's reports about some CIA official said something, or it may be a printed line in a document in a document seen by a journalist ...
But for an actual document, it's extremely rare.
Now, VAULT 7 is the largest ever series of publications about the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) in its history -- hundreds, thousands, of times larger than anything that has appeared before and it is on track to be the LARGEST INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATION EVER.
So that is, of course, DEEPLY HUMILIATING to the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) and its RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, like MI6, and in its relationship with, say, the NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) and with the FBI.
So it's a way to get away from that HUMILIATION and, of course the PUBLIC and TECH COMPANIES are also don't like it very much because we've REVEALED that the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) created an ENORMOUS HACKER FORCE [that] produced HUNDREDS OF VIRUSES which it then went around hacking and installing in people, developing methods to install these in cars and telephones and probably LOST CONTROL close to the WHOLE LOT of them - and covered it up.
So, LOST CONTROL of all this flowing around some INTELLIGENCE CONTRACTORS at the very least, and they covered it up.
So they didn't tell APPLE or MICROSOFT or other AFFECTED members of INDUSTRY about it, and the PUBLIC, of course, wasn't told.
It is quite interesting if it was also CONCEALED from President OBAMA.
Anyway, so they have quite a lot to be concerned about in terms of POSSIBLE PROSECUTION OF CIA OFFICERS; DE-FUNDING of certain parts; general LOWERING OF PRESTIGE.
And the CIA is a very INCOMPETENT organsiation. I mean, this is the organisation that - let's look at it:
the CIA is the organisation that gave us
* [the ILLEGAL INVASION of] IRAQ;
* AL-QAEDA;
* the destruction of democracy in IRAN;
* PINOCHET;
* the destruction of LIBYA;
* the effective rise of ISIS;
* and the SYRIAN CIVIL WAR.
So this is an organisation that goes around engaging in actions which are either DEEPLY INCOMPETENT or which, even from the perspective of AMERICAN POWER, are COUNTER to its PURPOSES.
RON PAUL:
Julian, your opponents aren't too difficult to understand if you once realise that, from my viewpoint, I don't think they're interested in the TRUTH nor the LAW and they are interested in PROPOGANDISING a certain POSITION in order to PROMOTE some POLITICAL VIEWPOINT.
But, you know, just recently you had an interview with [SEAN] HANNITY on FOX, which I found pretty fascinating.
I don't know what your opinion is of that, but I thought it was positive and it's interesting that FOX had this on their program.
How did you see this? Did you see this as an advantage to you, to at least get your side out in an audience that might be back and forth on the issue?
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
Yeah, just like publishing OpEds in THE WASHINGTON POST is now possible because THE WASHINGTON POST is lined against the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION and we now have a conflict in relation to the TRUMP CIA, so when that channel opens up, yes, we do it, because we reach an audience that we wouldn't necessarily normally reach.
Same with FOX.
Certain channels opened up there, because of CONFLICTS between the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION and the FBI administration and the CIA.
It looks like CIA essentially won now.
So that was important.
People like HANNITY and SARAH PALIN have been accused of being hypocrites because they made some negative comments about WIKILEAKS before; we published SARAH PALIN's E-MAILS in 2008 - so you can understand why she might have been a bit annoyed - but she said I should be hunted down like the TALIBAN back in 2010 - and a few months ago, she APOLOGISED.
Is she a 'hypocrite' or did she learn something and do the right thing?
Maybe she's both. I don't know. But I see that as something positive.
Regardless of what someone's previous position was, if they've now come to a better position, they should be applauded for coming to that better position.
DANIEL McADAMS - head of Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
- foreign policy expert
- worked for many years on Capitol Hill
- worked as an election monitor in eastern Europe
I'm constantly fascinated by the relationship between WIKILEAKS and the MAINSTREAM MEDIA (MSM).
You mentioned THE WASHINGTON POST, and they've of course accused WIKILEAKS of being:
"... It's core mission is not transparency but undermining US national security, if they gladly publish ..."
your documents.
But I think the thing that we haven't addressed yet that I think is very important, and I'm sure you're aware of this, it's the ONGOING DEMONISATION OF RUSSIA in the UNITED STATES.
Anyone who QUESTIONS THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE is an 'agent of Putin'; TRUMP is an 'agent of Putin'; we're all 'agents of Putin' if we don't go along with this business, but THE WASHINGTON POST - especially its editoral page - which, as you know, has a very NEOCONSERVATIVE bent, under FRED HYATT - it talks about WIKILEAKS has "close ties with RUSSIA's INTELLIGENCE SERVICES"; this was 'proven' by the INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY's REPORT about the DNC 'hack'.
Of course, we know about the DNC 'hack' - that the forensic investigation was done by an organisation called CROWD STRIKE.
THE WASHINGTON POST wrote about that quite a bit.
But, strangely enough, when CROWD STRIKE was DISCREDITED a couple of weeks ago, THE WASHINGTON POST neglected to mention that part.
So maybe you can address these charges that WIKILEAKS is 'colluding with RUSSIAN intelligence services.
JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS:
Yeah, it's very mischievous to see that in certain media. That, of course, is FALSE.
But there's NO ALLEGATION - NO OFFICIAL ALLEGATION - from the US GOVERNMENT that there is ANY evidence of WIKILEAKS 'colluding' with RUSSIA, or EVEN that WIKILEAKS 'is colluding' with RUSSIA but they can't find the evidence.
That simply doesn't exist and, in fact, it has been STATED MULTIPLE TIMES.
BARRAK OBAMA in his last speech said that there was NO EVIDENCE of WIKILEAKS 'colluding' with RUSSIA.
JAMES COMEY, within the last MONTH, has stated that if the RUSSIANS did anything with WIKILEAKS they didn't do anything directly with WIKILEAKS, unlike DNC LEAKS and GUCCIFER 2.0.
AND JAMES CLAPPER - the DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, under OBAMA - STATED just before the TRANSITION that the US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY had NO insight into how WIKILEAKS obtained its publications; when it obtained them; or the FREQUENCY or TIMING as to how we did our publications.
So there you have it DIRECTLY from BARACK OBAMA and from the head of the FBI and the head of the NATIONANL INTELLIGENCE that there's no collusion that they can discern between WIKILEAKS and the RUSSIAN state.
25:31
So when you see reportage in the MEDIA suggesting otherwise, this is something that is EVEN going BEYOND what US intelligence is saying.
I don't think US INTELLIGENCE is particularly credible.
We all know that they're not particularly credible and they definitely have an ANGLE that they want to push for, particularly for their own POLITICAL and INSTITUTIONAL reasons.
But they're NOT saying that WIKILEAKS 'colluded' with RUSSIA in any way.
WHEN GOING TO BED WITH DOGS IS NEWS, GETTING UP WITH FLEAS IS A SCOOP – HERE’S THE ONE ABOUT TRUMP’S BED, PUTIN’S BED
By John Helmer, Moscow
[ ... ]
A claim is being widely reported in the US media which supported Hillary Clinton for president that President-elect Donald Trump paid for at least two ladies to urinate on the bed in the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel of Moscow. A former British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) agent named Christopher Steele has reported the episode in a memorandum dated June 20, 2016, because he was paid by a US client to do it; and also because he was paid to speculate that the Russian Security Service (FSB) filmed it, and has been blackmailing Trump ever since.
Trump has responded that Steele is a “failed spy”. That is not an impetuous tweet. It’s the assessment of both US and British intelligence agencies, including MI6, for which Steele worked undercover in Moscow between 1994 and 1996. His cover was blown; he was evacuated; and as British intelligence sources report this week, Steele has been unable to enter Russia for a decade. “No Russian with official links and knowledge would risk communicating with Steele for fear of being detected by Russian counter-intelligence,” said an intelligence source in London, Said another: “I met [Steele] a couple of times and thought that for a relatively undistinguished man who never made very senior rank he was a smug, arrogant s.o.b. So I don’t work with him. The description of his being the top expert on Russia in MI6 is bollocks. ”
SHOCK CLAIM: Angela Merkel is BIGGER threat to Europe than ISIS, claims US professor ANGELA Merkel's failure to lead is a bigger threat to Europe's survival than Islamic State (ISIS), claims a US political scientist.
By Katie Mansfield and Monika Pallenberg
PUBLISHED: 03:44, Wed, Aug 3, 2016 | UPDATED: 10:01, Wed, Aug 3, 2016 In a scathing interview Professor Francis Fukuyama says Angela Merkel only cares about approval ratings and has hardly achieved anything for Europe.
Speaking to Die Welt, the Stanford University professor discusses the dangers of extremists to the survival of mankind and says the biggest threat is the rise of populism due to weak European leadership. [comment: it wasn't the 'populism' that this twat disdains, and it wasn't 'Nazis', driving that Nice-Attack bus, just as it wasn't 'populism' and 'Nazis' that knifed genitals, plucked out eyeballs and stuffed testicles into mouths at the Bataclan torture-mutilation bloodbath in France. ]
He said: "The jihadist ideology only has few followers. Of course it poses a serious threat, but the greatest threat to the survival of our democracy is a different one. It lies in ourselves." [comment: who is he speaking for? Who appointed Fukuyama spokesperson for European nations? Oh, American capitalists. That makes sense, then. They're intent on destroying Europe like they have destroyed United States. Furthermore, 'our democracy' is bullsh*t and rule by capitalist corruption. This guy is completely full of crap and this is an attempt to manipulate the public with the lie of 'democracy' (which is really: CAPITALIST TYRANNY).]
When questioned on what he meant, Professor Fukuyama said: "The fear driven by loss of confidence of our citizens in our own institutions.
"This way populism, which promises potentially lethal measures, can grow.
"Unfortunately this is the result of a disturbing lack of leadership that currently exists in Europe."
The 63-year-old was then asked to give an example. He said: "Let's take Germany. It was supposed to be the country that leads Europe to peace and prosperity. [comment: it is a country that was defeated in WWII and it has been occupied by US-Anglo capitalism since its defeat. The capitalist occupation that is destroying Europe has nothing to do with 'leading' Europe to 'peace' or anything else that serves the vital interests of Europeans. What a crock of crap this is. Why is he selling this crap? Defeated US-Anglo Capitalist Empire puppet state, Germany, leading 'Europe to peace'? Sure, shill. While American capitalist mercenary NATO is training missiles on Russia, right on Russia's doorstep and provoking military engagement with both Russia and China, having destroyed a series of nations in the Middle East and Africa.]
"Instead Chancellor Angela Merkel only cares about the approval of her own country.
"Her behaviour during the Euro crisis and the disputes with Greece was significant. Now she does the same with the Italian banks.
"The bad part is that this lack of leadership is not compensated for by other European heads of state, not by Francois Hollande, nor by the disastrous Cameron, who has by now resigned.
"These are all low level politicians who really have achieved hardly anything for Europe."
His comments come as the German Chancellor faces a backlash across Europe, with many blaming her open door refugee policy for a spate of terror attacks in Germany.
Thousands attended an anti-immigration rally in Berlin on Saturday with banners reading 'Merkel must go' and 'The queen of smugglers, Merkel must leave' seen in the crowds.
More than one million migrants have entered Germany in the past year, with many fleeing war in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq. [comment: and everywhere else in Asia and Africa. ]
Professor Fukuyama said: "The welcoming policies are admirable. But also very dangerous. They can cause a devastating turmoil within the European Community.
"There are limits in regards to the integration ability of newcomers. And Schengen has gaps everywhere at its external borders." [comment: Integration? This academic is a fool. There is no integrating foreigners into European homelands. There is merely the divestment of European heritage and the destruction of Europe.]
The professor, who is known for his book The End of History and the Last Man, also blasted Donald Trump in the interview, branding him "a threat to American democracy". [comment: Trump, a "threat to democracy". Did the CIA put him up to this, seeing one of their own, rat-faced Michael Morrell, has been squawking what a national security 'threat' Trump is? LMAO. Biggest threat to the planet is Hillary Clinton, the CIA and the US-Anglo Capitalist Empire. And 'democracy'? F*ck off, shill. There is no 'democracy'. There is just rule by corrupt American oligarchy, in the paragon of capitalist fraud 'democracy' and multiracial soup slops, crime-ridden, cop killing, whites murdering and raping, looting and rioting, divided in perpetuity, USA. What fool would model their nation (let alone divest their own people of a nation) in the image of this vile hell on earth? ] http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/695927/Angela-Merkel-bigger-threat-Europe-than-ISIS-claims-Professor-Francis-Fukuyam
Sam Gerrans Democracy: A Heretic's View (2004) LINK | here
COMMENT
The threat to Europe and European societies is a DEMOGRAPHIC THREAT.
It is that simple. Wake up.
Screw 'democracy'. Democracy does not exist: it's fraud and there is nothing but capitalist rule that has destroyed United States and is destroying European societies.
Furthermore, by DEFINITION 'democracy' is f*cking 'populism', you capitalist sponsored intelligentsia twat.
The People Will Decide in Turkey Israel Shamir • July 19, 2016
The most striking feature of the failed Turkish coup has been the people’s response. The plotters did their routine right: they seized the broadcasting station, they sent a sortie to kill the president, they stationed troops in the vital points, they rolled out the tanks. They calculated everything but the people’s response. As the president survived the attempt on his life, he had made the mobile phone streaming call to the nation urging people to get out and decide their future for themselves.
At first, thousands, then tens of thousands, and even hundreds of thousands of ordinary men and women dared the army and took to the streets and the squares in response to the call of their almost deposed president. They elected him just a few months ago, and they weren’t going to let the army steal their vote. This massive popular uprising-for-the-government broke the will of the plotters. Thus history has been made in Turkey, by direct action of the people.
Amazed by the epic fail of the putsch, Erdogan’s enemies concocted a “hoax coup” conspiracy story. In the pro-Zionist Al-Monitor, a Turkish expert asked accusingly: “Why did the putschists — knowing that Erdogan was neither in Ankara nor Istanbul but instead spending his vacation in the Mediterranean seaside town of Marmaris — not move to detain him?” However, now we have this video of the armed soldiers dropping by ropes from their helicopters and storming the hotel where the president stayed – some thirty minutes after he left. The plotters moved but not fast enough. [COMMENT: al-Monitor, based Washington DC, launched 2012 by Jamal Daniel, Pres. Texas Investment Co. (managing energy & other interest) / Marmaris = south-eastern Turkey ]
Anyway people had no reason to think the coup was a hoax in real time. They had a rough choice: they could get out to the streets supporting the president, or sulk at home. They went out to support Erdogan. This was the best kind of election, immediate democracy, and Erdogan won that election. [comment: LOL ... Turkey is far from democratic. But there's no democracy anywhere. It's either capitalist dictatorship with phoney elections or it's an overt and brutal dictatorship like Turkey's a dictatorship. Wonder if the Turkey election was faked? ]
Despite State Secretary Kerry’s denials, the pointers are to Washington and Tel Aviv, and perhaps to Brussels as well.Turkish top brass has long been known for its pro-NATO, pro-USA and pro-Israel sympathies. The coup leader, the Air Force commander General Akin Öztürk served as the military attaché in Tel Aviv. Bekir Ercan Van, the commander of the Incirlik air base has been arrested after his request for political asylum in the US had been refused. If they had won, they would have been applauded and feted in the West. Yes, Virginia, there was a coup, and it failed. [comment: wow, really? I was leaning towards the fake coup option. Turkey was prepared to commit false flag activities in Syria, so why not a false coup to ensure no challenge to power of the Ottoman wannabes? ]
The man behind the coup is allegedly Fethullah Gülen, once an ally of Erdogan but now his bitter enemy. It is claimed Gülen’s organisation Hizmet (Service) forms a “deep state” or a “parallel state” in Turkey and beyond, with millions of followers in all walks of life, something similar to free masons of old. The ex-FBI whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds described Gülen’s network as a CIA asset.
The Russians run afoul of Gülen by banning Hizmet’s activities in Russia in 2008. The Turkish F-16 pilot who almost changed the history of the Middle East by shooting down the Russian SU-24 bomber over Syria on November 24, 2015 (his name was Mustafa Hajruoglu, it was claimed by his Bosnian countrymen) turned out to be a Gülen follower and a putschist, said Ankara Mayor Melih Gökçek. His helicopter was shot down in Ankara. This is not an example of fast thinking: in March 2016, the pro-government newspaper Sabah suggested that the pilot of the F-16 was a Gülen supporter and acted upon his instructions. Whether Gülen had been hostile to Russia for his own reasons or followed CIA orders, he succeeded in causing enmity between Putin and Erdogan.
Apparently, the courageous Erdogan’s decision to apologise and make up with Russia had triggered the military coup. There were rumours in Moscow that the Russian Secret Service tipped Erdogan off some minutes before the plotters’ attack thus allowing him to escape to Istanbul. This is perhaps wishful thinking.
Russians were not very consistent in the Turkish affair. After SU-24 downing, Putin spoke of being “stabbed in the back”, and Russian state media with its numerous Armenians and Jews went into hysterical overdrive producing gigabytes of hatred-for-Turkey day after day, until ordinary Russians considered Erdogan their personal and vicious enemy. Russian nationalists dreamed the old Russian pipedream of seizing Istanbul, or Constantinople, as it was called five hundred years ago, and restoring it to Christendom, a dream as futile as that of restoring Cordoba to Islam. [comment: lol ... Erdogan *is* the enemy of Russia. While seizing Istanbul may be a pipe dream, Islam seizing Cordoba is not. Stand by for the European Caliphate. European capitalists are morons that should be overthrown at once. ]
I wrote a few pieces in Russian calling for speedy reconciliation with Turkey and Erdogan; but my usual outlets refused to publish them. So they had to be published in rather marginal media. For freedom of speech, I am afraid, Russia is not better than the US. [comment: Sounds like a patriotic Russian press then? Russia is the target of American capitalist thieves, who have already raped Russia in the early 1990s. Anything Russia does to secure Russian interests is OK by me. ]
When Putin agreed to reconcile, the Russian state media made an about turn pretty fast, and the ordinary Russians were happy and booked all seats on all flights to Turkey. They forgot their hatred on the spot. Just the grumpy old men in the social networks complained, baying for Turkish blood. [comment: got to be kidding, Russia. I would never reconcile. Do not holiday there. Go to China. ]
Israel was among the last of the states to call for constitutional order to prevail in Turkey, and even then, Netanyahu’s very brief message mainly concerned the ongoing normalisation of relations. His friend General Sisi, the military dictator of Egypt, went as far as to block a Security Council resolution condemning the coup. Quite natural, too, as he had come to power by overthrowing the elected president.
However, what worked in Egypt did not work in Turkey. The Turks did not surrender their freedom and their right to decide. Now, after the putsch they are free to proceed with their choice. I was particularly impressed by their sacking of the judges, in their hundreds (755, to be exact). It appears that the Deep State, the subterranean societal structures built by security services and by Gülen’s Hizmet, invested a lot of effort in judges and in the mainstream media, in the two least democratic government powers, not only in Turkey. [comment: I don't know what side the judges are on, but it doesn't look really good if the government must purge 755 judges. It's a dictatorship ... & the bearded head-chopping that took over the streets doesn't impress me as 'democratic'. It was frightening. ]
Turkey’s Lesson
This brings the US elections to mind. Perhaps the people of America may take a lesson or two from the Turks, while Mr Donald Trump may take a lesson or two from the Turkish president. The Turks could teach you, my American readers: do not surrender to plotters. The power rightfully belongs to you; do not allow them to usurp the power.
The Turkish would-be usurpers were generals who moved their tanks, the American would-be usurpers are more sophisticated; they move banks, politicians, parties, media, justice; but they are usurpers all the same as they reject and subvert democracy.
Democracy means letting people decide; but there is a new class that usurps this right to decide. They place themselves above democracy. They are patronising and condescending to ordinary citizen. They speak to and about the people as the Turkish officers to Erdogan voters. They think they know better. They delegitimise another view. Rather, they do not consider the majority view as being legitimate at all. They think they are superior. [comment: what they call 'democracy' is just one great lie, especially in America where the capitalist oligarchy controls politics. Aside from the capitalist dictatorship factor, even if democracy were possible, why would you want a bunch of uninformed people (or ideologically duped voters) decide the fate of a nation. The entire 'democracy' philosophy is an unworkable fraud, however you look at 'democracy'. ]
This new class is not in the US only, they are everywhere. But for all their snotty arrogance, they can be beaten.
In the UK, the superior people pooh-poohed the suggestion to leave the EU. They said that only illiterate homophobe racist rednecks could vote for parting with the blessed rule of Brussels and with the right to receive millions of migrants from Poland and Turkey. Every opinion poll pointed to their victory for respondents were shy to admit they were sick of the EU and of Polish plumbers. But the English people weren’t shy to vote the way they wanted. And the would-be-usurpers were beaten.
They were beaten a second time when they tried to remove Jeremy Corbyn from his position at the helm of the Labour. Their attempted coup failed as miserably as the Turkish one. The mixture of heavily Jewish neocons, Blairites, upwardly-mobile-migrants attacked Corbyn daily in the Guardian, but the voters said: hands off.
In Russia there are superior people, too. They wanted to get rid of Putin; they hated the church he attended; they wanted to open Russian resources to the foreign interests. The Russian superior class is more candid; they can’t keep their mouth shut. They said that majority has no legitimacy, because they are not sufficiently educated, not wealthy enough, too parochial. Still, the Russian voters supported Putin in the booth and they supported him on the streets.
And now it is America’s turn. Your superior class decided Hillary Clinton should rule, for they do not trust a white man. Men are too independent. And they plotted, instead of honestly seeking your support.
We saw recently how the plotters got rid of Bernie Sanders. The votes of California weren’t counted yet, but the plotters already announced Crooked Hillary the winner. In every state, the rolls were changed in such a way as to preclude Bernie’s win. The old election machines allowed hackers to subtly alter the results. Perhaps good old Bernie himself was the Joker in the hands of plotters, the bent boxer who was paid to lose. Or perhaps he was a weak guy who could not withstand the pressure. Anyway the American plotters stole your vote as sure as the Turkish generals tried to steal the Turkish vote.
Now they are on their way to steal your vote by destroying Trump. The newspapers are at him like dogs besetting the bear at a royal hunt. No fair play for them; they are out to kill. In The New York Times, every piece on Trump is a poisoned arrow aimed at your mind. By going out against the basic rules of democracy, didn’t the owners and editors of Forbes, WSJ, NY Times et al prove to be latent putschists?
If they will fail to defeat Trump at the booth, they still have the judges. They are anything but impartial: they are the basis of the DeepState in the US as well as in Turkey.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an unelected (Clinton-appointed) old hag dared to say: “I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president”. This is a herem, a fatwa, a ban. This is a call to putsch in case of Trump’s victory. Do you think she will stop at anything to prevent Trump from gaining the White House? She and her cronies believe they are above democracy of hoi polloi.
She is not the only judge who deserves Erdogan treatment. Trump objected to aJudge Gonzalo Curiel for he is a member of La Raza (The Race), a body as exclusive as KKK or as B’nei Brith; still the Wall Street Journal would claim he objects to the judge’s ethnicity.Forbes invented a long hair-splitting explanation i.e. ‘La Raza’ is a ‘nod to our common heritage’ or that it refers to “Latinos carrying forward the culture of Rome, based in beauty and harmony, in opposition to the Saxon – barbarian – culture based on violence and domination”, which is, in my view as racist as it gets. [comment: The entire thing is demented. Why do Europeans subject themselves to this? The only way to live is to live in a monoculture, or something very close to it. America is my idea of a horror movie about mutants. Japan is more my thing. ]
It’s not that I mind racism or find it an unbearable fault. After all, racism is a middle name of every second Jew I ever met. But the duplicity is annoying: why the Forbes thinks that “Latinos are beautiful and harmonious, while Anglo-Saxon culture is based on violence and domination” is less racist than vice versa? [comment: LOL ... Forbes is a joke of a publication, spinning nothing but anti-European pro-destruction of European societies crap. Ummm ... I was thinking Huffington Post. Oops. But Forbes is probably more of the same crap. It looks like they're anti Trump. Anti Trump is anti European.
COMMENT / INSERT
Forbes published shameless propaganda, using not our opinion disclaimer shield to push this shite:
Roger Valdez:
"Today, there seems to be a similar and growing interest in studying Weimar Germany. The obvious reason is the popular conception of Donald Trump as a kind of nascent Hitler taking advantage of divisions for personal power. ... "
"... a perfect vacuum for a strong man with a clear, concise and simply ideology to step in whether from the right or the left. The extremes always have more certainty to offer people especially in times of foment. And Donald Trump has brilliantly called out differences between “us and them.” Like Hitler, he has talked about how trade deals have betrayed the American worker just the way Hitler blamed the establishment for stabbing ordinary Germans in the back at Versailles."
Roger Valdez For the past twenty years ... involved in public policy in the areas of education, health, and housing. ... an advocate for progressive supply side solutions to housing scarcity ... staff person for state and local elected officials, work in the non-profit sector
F*ck You, Forbes
Roger Valdez https://www.linkedin.com/in/abricoleur
lobbies for: urban density
heads up Smart Growth Seattle a developer-backed group
fighting the city’s planned construction fee to fund affordable housing
bizjournals.com
Funded By Seattle Real Estate Developers, Forbes Writer Attacks Amazon Critic
Posted on March 3, 2015 by Jeff Reifman
... Roger Valdez’s column in Forbes today (How Jobs and Awkward White Men Are Destroying a City) in which he likens my criticism of Amazon’s overwhelming impacts on Seattle to racism against Chinese immigrants in the late 19th century. http://jeffreifman.com/2015/03/03/funded-seattle-real-estate-developers-forbes-writer-attacks-amazon-critic/
Amazon's a slave driver's organisation, so I'm cool with Amazon coming under criticism. But the Reifman guy goes on to challenge Amazon re "Amazon’s white male-dominated culture", which sounds like the only positive thing going for Amazon. Amazon being the slave-driving organisation that it is, I expect this culture is not by design but by default. I'm pretty sure if some other group served the purposes of Amazon, they'd be in.
Why do Europeans allow themselves to be the subject of 'White Men' press assaults in their own societies? Wake up.
If you insist, yes, ethnicity can influence a judge’s decision. In Israeli-Palestinian conflict, thousands of Palestinians were killed including American citizens, and no one received any compensation. But it is relatives of American Jews who collected $600 million of damages from the Palestinian authority. Is it a coincidence that the judge was Jewish?
Now everything depends on you. You can vote for Trump – but be prepared to go out to the streets in support of the legitimacy. Do not give in to usurpers. The Brits did it a few weeks ago by voting for Brexit. The Turks did it. You can do it, too! [comment: Americans are idiots if they don't vote Trump over the Clinton witch. Unfortunately, Americans inclined to vote for a Republican are also probably now a minority in America, and are up against the ideologically brainwashed Democrat cucks and a large demographic with competing interests that has been granted political rights in the nation of the aforementioned. Urging voters to hit the streets? Ummm, I don't know about that. Somewhere as f*cked up as the US seems to be, you'd have WWIII breaking out. ]
This article was first published in The Unz Review.
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net
The failed Turkey coup is still an unknown to me. I was thinking it was maybe a staged coup, so Erdogan can secure his position.
As I said above, what they call 'democracy' is ridiculous.
Turkey is far from democratic. I wasn't impressed with the Islamists that hit the streets in Turkey. I was terrified.
While voting for Trump might be better than voting for the vile Clinton woman, and while those that voted for BREXIT did well, the system remains sh*t and the ruling capitalists win no matter who is elected.
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
