Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
" ... gets testy when RT’s Gayane Chichakyan asks if Iraq has a legitimate concern over “the situation where the US invites forces to Iraq and the US is leading this coalition … but when something goes wrong, the US says it’s none of our business -- like, what's happening?"
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
COMMENT
This is my non-PC take on the state of affairs at the US State Dept. ... lol
Really enjoyed doing that.
Only problem is, what takes seconds to think about takes forever (plus some PC crashes) to implement electronically. Think I might be low on RAM or something. Old PC. And downloading takes forever. I'm faster than the computer. I'm ready to post. Computer's still doing its thing, downloading adjusted GIF etc. It's making me crazy-errrrrrrr. lol
The guy holding up the newspaper is Julian Assange of WikiLeaks and the guy asking 'What?' is Associated Press (AP) reporter, Matt Lee.
Now that it's done, it's not as hilarious as it first seemed. lol
[Could do with more tweaking, but I don't have patience for more right now. ... lol]
President Maduro last night went the on-air last night and said that they'd arrested multiple people who are behind a coup that was backed by the United States. What is your response?
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
These latest accusations, like all previous such accusations, are ludicrous. As a matter of long-standing policy, the United States does not support political transitions by non-constitutional means. Political transitions must be democratic, constitutional, peaceful, and legal.
We have seen many times that the Venezuelan government tries to distract from its own actions by blaming the United States, or other members of the international community, for events inside Venezuela. These efforts reflect a lack of seriousness on the part of Venezuelan government to deal with the grave situation it faces.
Matt Lee (Press)
The US has - whoa, whoa, whoa. The US has a long-standing practice of not promoting - what did you say? How long-standing is that? I would [chuckle] - in particular in South and Latin America, that is not a long-standing practice.
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
Well, my point here, Matt -
Matt Lee (Press)
[Interjects]
Not in this case -
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
- without getting into history, is that we do not support, we have no involvement with, and these are ludicrous accusation.
Matt Lee (Press)
In this specific case [?]
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
[Interjects]
Correct.
Matt Lee (Press)
But if you go back, not that long ago, during your lifetime even.
[background chuckle]
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
This is the last 21 years?
[laughter]
Matt Lee (Press)
Well done. Touché. But, I mean - does longs-standing mean 10 years, in this case. I mean, what is -
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
[interjects]
Matt, my intention was to speak to the specific reports.
Matt Lee (Press)
I understand.
But you said it's a long-standing US practice, and I'm not so sure. It depends on what your definition of long-standing is.
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
[Interjects]
We will - OK.
Male (Press) [Interjects]
[... inaudible ...] in Kiev.
Whatever we say about Ukraine, whatever - the change of government in the beginning of last year was unconstitutional and yet [chuckles] you supported it. The constitution was not - the constitution -
US State Department
spokesperson Jen Psaki
[Interjects]
That was also ludicrous.
[Video cuts to Amy Goodman]
Amy Goodman
Democracy Now!
That was State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki being questioned by reporters.
Professor Miguel Tiner Salas, if you could respond to both that exchange and also Josh Ernest, State Department -- err, White House - spokesperson.
Professor Miguel Tiner Salas
Promona College
I would have loved if that kind of exchange got a broader diffusion in the US press, but the fact is that it hasn't, and we continue to have the belief that the US does not - is not involved in unconstitutional change in Latin America and, as a historian, the record speaks just the opposite: from '53 in Guatemala, to the Dominican Republic, to Chile in '73, and through the ardent support of the Argentine military dictatorships, in Brazil. And, if we want to go even closer, to 2002 in Venezuela, when the US did actually support a coup against the democratically elected Hugo Chavez - the shortest coup in the world and the coup that brought Chavez back to power. And, then again, in Honduras in 2009 and, not shortly thereafter, in Paraguay with Fernando Lugo, where they said it was a democratic transition, when, in fact, it was an unconstitutional shift in power.
So, again, the notion that the US has not supported both military coups - directly, or through what they call 'soft power' - is really ludicrous and, in fact, we should turn the question around: if they want to support democracy, I think the best thing the US can do, in the case of Venezuela and other countries, is to pull back and let things develop on their own. I think you have a very strong opposition in Venezuela. It can speak for itself. And you have a government force and other social forces that are organised in those countries, and I think the best thing, in the case of Mexico and in the case of Venezuela, is for the US to stop intervening.
--- end audio 3:38 ---
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
US Supported Coups
(ie merely those mentioned in video)
Latin America
Guatemala, 1953
Dominican Republic
Chile, 1973
Argentina
Brazil
Venezuela, 2002, Hugo Chavez
Honduras, 2009
Paraguay, Fernando Lugo
Europe
Ukraine, 2014
OTHER (incl. list US coups)
Ecuadorian President Says The CIA Is Attempting To Overthrow His Government
The CIA has a history of contributing to coups in Ecuador. Back in 1963, the CIA led a coup which deposed President Carlos Julio Arosemena because he criticized the United States and supported Fidel Castro’s revolution in Cuba.
So the next time Human Rights Watch comes out with a report that's
critical of Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians, I'll assume
that you're going to be saying the same thing, correct? That you think
that the report is credible, it's based on eyewitness accounts? Uh, as -- And you're not going to say that it's politically motivated and should be dismissed?
You know Matt, as you have made clear again and again in this room, we are not always consistent.
"Associated
Press' Matt Lee is one of those rare reporters who frequently
challenges U.S. foreign policy hypocrisy, both in general and, even more
rarely, as it pertains to the nation's support for Israel." As Glenn Greenwald points out, "a remarkably revealing exchange."
Check it out in context.
Source - Representative Press - check out Youtube - here.
"During a press briefing ... State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf accused Russia of firing artillery across the border into Ukraine, but refused to give any evidence supporting her claim.
When Associated Press reporter Matt Lee attempted to follow up by asking if this information was based on a YouTube video, Harf brushed off his question and then said “I just said I wasn’t going to give you the underlying source for it. A bitter back-and-forth then followed."
Marie Harf has nothing but a bunch of allegations ... LOL