TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label US-Anglo Capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US-Anglo Capitalism. Show all posts

October 07, 2016

Hillary Clinton's Extraordinary Humanitaran Achievements As Secretary of State, Feminist & Humanitarian





ministry of tokyo







GARY LEUPP

http://novorossia.today/i-urged-him-to-bomb-the-warmongering-record-of-hillary-clinton/

NOTE:  I have edited the two spellings of 'Gaddafi' that were in this article (ie. 'Gadhafi' and 'Gadhafy' to read the single Western spelling 'Gaddafi') - otherwise this reproduction is the same as that at novorossiya.today)

“I urged him to bomb…” The Warmongering Record of Hillary Clinton

on: April 14, 2015

If reason and justice prevailed in this country, you’d think that the recent series of articles in the Washington Times concerning the U.S.-NATO attack on Libya in 2011 would torpedo Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects.

Clinton as U.S. Secretary of State at that time knew that Libya was no threat to the U.S. She knew that Muammar Gaddafi had been closely cooperating with the U.S. in combating Islamist extremism. She probably realized that Gaddafi had a certain social base due in part to what by Middle Eastern standards was the relatively equitable distribution of oil income in Libya. [comment:  it was a very generous distribution of income - here]

But she wanted to topple Gaddafi. Over the objections of Secretary of “Defense” Robert Gates but responding to the urgings of British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicholas Sarkozy, she advocated war. Why? Not for the reason advertised at the time. (Does this sound familiar?) Not because Gaddafi was preparing a massacre of the innocents in Benghazi, as had occurred in Rwanda in 1994. (That episode, and the charge that the “international community” had failed to intervene, was repeatedly referenced by Clinton and other top officials, as a shameful precedent that must not be repeated. It had also been deployed by Bill Clinton in 1999, when he waged war on Serbia, grossly exaggerating the extent of carnage in Kosovo and positing the immanent prospect of “genocide” to whip up public support. Such uses of the Rwandan case reflect gross cynicism.)

No, genocide was not the issue, in Libya any more than in Kosovo. According to the Washington Times, high-ranking U.S. officials indeed questioned whether there was evidence for such a scenario in Libya. The Defense Intelligence Agency estimated that a mere 2,000 Libyan troops armed with 12 tanks were heading to Benghazi, and had killed about 400 rebels by the time the U.S. and NATO attacked. It found evidence for troops firing on unarmed protestors but no evidence of mass killing. It did not have a good estimate on the number of civilians in Benghazi but had strong evidence that most had fled. It had intelligence that Gaddafi had ordered that troops not fire on civilians but only on armed rebels.

The Pentagon doubted that Gaddafi would risk world outrage by ordering a massacre. One intelligence officer told the Washington Times that the decision to bomb was made on the basis of “light intelligence.” Which is to say, lies, cherry-picked information such as a single statement by Gaddafi (relentlessly repeated in the corporate press echoing State Department proclamations) that he would “sanitize Libya one inch at a time” to “clear [the country] of these rats.” (Similar language, it was said, had been used by Hutu leaders in Rwanda.) Now that the rats in their innumerable rival militias control practically every square inch of Libya, preventing the emergence of an effective pro-western government, many at the Pentagon must be thinking how stupid Hillary was.

No, the attack was not about preventing a Rwanda-like genocide. Rather, it was launched because the Arab Spring, beginning with the overthrow of the two dictators, President Ben Ali of Tunisia and President Mubarak of Egypt, had taken the west by surprise and presented it with a dilemma: to retain longstanding friendships (including that with Gaddafi, who’d been a partner since 2003) in the face of mass protests, or throw in its lot with the opposition movements, who seemed to be riding an inevitable historical trend, hoping to co-opt them?

Recall how Obama had declined up to the last minute to order Mubarak to step down, and how Vice President Joe Biden had pointedly declined to describe Mubarak as a dictator. Only when millions rallied against the regime did Obama shift gears, praise the youth of Egypt for their inspiring mass movement, and withdraw support for the dictatorship. After that Obama pontificated that Ali Saleh in Yemen (a key ally of the U.S. since 2001) had to step down in deference to protesters. Saleh complied, turning power to another U.S. lackey (who has since resigned). Obama also declared that Assad in Syria had “lost legitimacy,” commanded him to step down, and began funding the “moderate” armed opposition in Syria. (The latter have at this point mostly disappeared or joined al-Qaeda and its spin-offs. Some have turned coat and created the “Loyalists’ Army” backing Assad versus the Islamist crazies.)

Hillary, that supposedly astute stateswoman, believed that the Arab Spring was going to topple all the current dictators of the Middle East and that, given that, the U.S. needed to position itself as the friend of the opposition movements. Gaddafi was a goner, she reasoned, so shouldn’t the U.S. help those working towards his overthrow?

Of course the U.S. (or the combination of the U.S. and NATO) couldn’t just attack a sovereign state to impose regime change. It would, at any rate, have been politically damaging after the regime change in Iraq that had been justified on the basis of now well discredited lies. So the U.S. arm-twisted UNSC members to approve a mission to protect civilians in Libya against state violence. China and Russia declined to use their veto power (although as western duplicity and real motives became apparent, they came to regret this). The Libya campaign soon shifted from “peace-keeping” actions such as the imposition of a “no-fly” zone to overt acts of war against the Gaddafi regime, which for its part consistently insisted that the opposition was aligned with al-Qaeda.

The results of “Operation Unified Protector” have of course been absolutely disastrous. Just as the U.S. and some of its allies wrecked Iraq, producing a situation far worse than that under Saddam Hussein, so they have inflicted horrors on Libya unknown during the Gaddafi years. These include the persecution of black Africans and Tuaregs, the collapse of any semblance of central government, the division of the country between hundreds of warring militias, the destabilization of neighboring Mali producing French imperialist intervention, the emergence of Benghazi as an al-Qaeda stronghold, and the proliferation of looted arms among rebel groups. The “humanitarian intervention” was in fact a grotesque farce and huge war crime.

But the political class and punditry in this country do not attack Hillary for war crimes, or for promoting lies to validate a war of aggression. Rather, they charge her and the State Department with failure to protect U.S. ambassador to Libya John Christopher Stevens and other U.S. nationals from the attack that occurred in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. And they fault her for promoting the State Department’s initial “talking point” that the attack had been a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim YouTube film rather than a calculated terrorist attack. They pan her for sniping at a senator during a hearing, “What difference does it make (whether the attack had been launched by protestors spontaneously, or was a terrorist action planned by forces unleashed by the fall of the Gaddafi regime)”?

In other words: Hillary’s mainstream critics are less concerned with the bombing of Libya in 2011 that killed over 1100 civilians, and produced the power vacuum exploited by murderous jihadis, than by Hillary’s alleged concealment of evidence that might show the State Department inadequately protected U.S. diplomats from the consequences of the U.S.-orchestrated regime change itself. In their view, the former First Lady might have blood on her hands—but not that, mind you, of Libyan civilians, or Libyan military forces going about their normal business, or of Gaddafi who was sodomized with a knife while being murdered as Washington applauded.

No, she’s held accountable for the blood of these glorified, decent upstanding Americans who’d been complicit in the ruin of Libya.

This version of events is easy to challenge. It’s easy to show that Clinton skillfully—in full neocon mode, spewing disinformation to a clueless public—steered an attack on Libya that has produced enormous blowback and ongoing suffering for the Libyan people. If a right-wing paper like Washington Times can expose this, how much more the more “mainstream” press? Could they at least not raise for discussion whether what Rand Paul calls “Hillary’s war” was, like the Iraq War (and many others) based on lies? Shouldn’t Hillary be hammered with the facts of her history, and her vaunted “toughness” be exposed as callous indifference to human life?

* * *

While championing the rights of women and children, arguing that “it takes a village” to raise a child, Clinton has endorsed the bombing of villages throughout her public life. Here are some talking points for those appalled by the prospects of a Hillary Clinton presidency.

    *She has always been a warmonger. As First Lady from January 1993, she encouraged her husband Bill and his secretary of state Madeleine Albright to attack Serbian forces in the disintegrating Yugoslaviain Bosnia in 1994 and Serbia in 1999. She’s stated that in 1999 she phoned her husband from Africa. “I urged him to bomb,” she boasts. These Serbs were (as usual) forces that did not threaten the U.S. in any way. The complex conflicts and tussles over territory between ethnic groups in the Balkans, and the collapse of the Russian economy following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, gave Bill Clinton an excuse to posture as the world’s savior and to use NATO to impose order. Only the United States, he asserted, could restore order in Yugoslavia, which had been a proudly neutral country outside NATO and the Warsaw Pact throughout the Cold War. President Clinton and Albright also claimed that only NATOdesigned in 1949 to counter a supposed Soviet threat to Western Europe, but never yet deployed in battleshould deal with the Balkan crises.

    The Bosnian intervention resulted in the imposition of the “Dayton Accord” on the parties involved and the creation of the dysfunctional state of Bosnia-Herzegovina. The Kosovo intervention five years later (justified by the scaremongering, subsequently disproven reports of a Serbian genocidal campaign against Kosovars) involved the NATO bombing of Belgrade and resulted in the dismemberment of Serbia. Kosovo, now recognized by the U.S. and many of its allies as an independent state, is the center of Europe’s heroin trafficking and the host of the U.S.’s largest army base abroad. The Kosovo war, lacking UN support and following Albright’s outrageous demand for Serbian acquiescence—designed, as she gleefully conceded, “to set the bar too high” for Belgrade and Moscow’s acceptance—of NATO occupation of all of Serbia, was an extraordinary provocation to Serbia’s traditional ally Russia. “They need some bombing, and that’s what they are going to get,” Albright said at the time, as NATO prepared to bomb a European capital for the first time since 1945.

    *Clinton has been a keen advocate for the expansion of an antiquated Cold War military alliance that persists in provoking Russia. In the same year that NATO bombed Belgrade (1999), the alliance expanded to include Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia. But Clinton’s predecessor George H. W. Bush had promised Russia in 1989 that NATO would not expand eastward. And since the Warsaw Pact had been dissolved in 1991, and since Russia under Boris Yeltsin hardly threatened any western countries, this expansion has understandably been viewed in Russia as a hostile move. George Kennan, a former U.S. ambassador to the USSR and a father of the “containment” doctrine, in 1998 pronounced the expansion a “tragic mistake” with “no reason whatsoever.” But the expansion continued under George W. Bush and has continued under Obama. Russia is now surrounded by an anti-Russian military alliance from its borders with the Baltic states to the north to Romania and Bulgaria. U.S.-backed “color revolutions” have been designed to draw more countries into the NATO camp. Hillary as secretary of state was a big proponent of such expansion, and under her watch, two more countries (Albania and Croatia) joined the U.S.-dominated alliance.

    (To understand what this means to Russia, imagine how Washington would respond to a Russia-centered “defensive” military alliance requiring its members to spend 2% of their GDPs on military spending and coordinate military plans with Moscow incorporating Canada and all the Caribbean countries, surrounding the continental U.S., and now moving to include Mexico. Would this not be a big deal for U.S. leaders?)

    *As New York senator Clinton endorsed the murderous ongoing sanctions against Iraq, imposed by the UN in 1990 and continued until 2003. Initially applied to force Iraqi forces out of Kuwait, the sanctions were sustained at U.S. insistence (and over the protests of other Security Council members) up to and even beyond the U.S. invasion in 2003. Bill Clinton demanded their continuance, insisting that Saddam Hussein’s (non-existent) secret WMD programs justified them. In 1996, three years into the Clinton presidency, Albright was asked whether the death of half a million Iraq children as a result of the sanctions was justified, and famously replied in a television interview, “We think it was worth it.” Surely Hillary agreed with her friend and predecessor as the first woman secretary of state. She also endorsed the 1998 “Operation Desert Fox” (based on lies, most notably the charge that Iraq had expelled UN inspectors) designed to further destroy Iraq’s military infrastructure and make future attacks even easier.

    *She was a strident supporter of the Iraq War. As a New York senator from 2001 to 2009, Hillary aligned herself with the neoconservatives in the Bush administration, earning a reputation as a hawk. She was a fervent supportive of the attack on Iraq, based on lies, in 2003. On the floor of the Senate she echoed all the fictions about Saddam Hussein’s “chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.” She declared, “He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.” She suggested that her decision to support war was “influenced by my eight years of experience on the other end of Pennsylvania Ave. in the White House watching my husband deal with serious challenges to our nation.” (Presumably by the latter she meant the threats posed by Serbs in Bosnia and Kosovo.) Her loss to Obama in the Democratic primary in 2008 was due largely to Obama’s (supposed) antiwar position contrasting with her consistently pro-war position. She has only vaguely conceded that her support for the invasion was something of a mistake. But she blames her vote on others, echoing Dick Cheney’s bland suggestion that the problem was “intelligence failures.” “If we knew know then what we know now,” she stated as she began her presidential campaign in late 2006, “I certainly wouldn’t have voted” for the war.

    *She actively pursued anti-democratic regime change in Ukraine. As secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, Clinton as noted above endorsed NATO’s relentless expansion. She selected to serve as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs the neocon Victoria Nuland, who had been the principal deputy foreign advisor to Cheney when he was vice president. The wife of neocon pundit Robert Kagan, Nuland is a war hawk whose current mission in life is the full encirclement of Russia with the integration of Ukraine into the EU and then into NATO. The ultimate goal was the expulsion of the Russian Black Sea Fleet from the Crimean Peninsula (where it has been stationed since 1783). She has boasted of the fact that the U.S. has invested five billion dollars in supporting what she depicts as the Ukrainian people’s “European aspirations.” What this really means is that the U.S. exploited political divisions in Ukraine to topple an elected leader and replace him with Nuland’s handpicked prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyev, deploying neo-Nazi shock troops in the process and generating a civil war that has killed over 5000 people.

    Clinton has increasingly vilified Vladimir Putin, the popular Russian president, absurdly comparing the Russian re-annexation of the Crimean Peninsula following a popular referendum with Hitler’s annexation of the Sudetenland. She is totally on board the program of producing a new Cold War, and forcing European allies to cooperate in isolating the former superpower.

    *She wanted to provide military assistance to the “moderate” armed opposition in Syria, to effect regime change, and after leaving office criticized Obama for not supplying more than he did. In 2011 Clinton wanted the U.S. to arm rebels who quickly became aligned with the al-Nusra Front (an al-Qaeda affiliate) and other extreme Islamists, in order to bring down a secular regime that respects religious rights, rejects the implementation of Sharia law, and promotes the education of women. The U.S. indeed has supplied arms to anti-Assad forces from at least January 2014, But as it happens the bulk of U.S. aid to the “moderate rebels” has been appropriated by Islamists, and some of it is deployed against U.S. allies in Iraq. It is now widely understood that the bulk of “moderate” rebels are either in Turkish exile or directed by CIA agents, while the U.S. plans to train some 5000 new recruits in Jordan. Meanwhile Assad has won election (as fair as any held in a U.S. client state like Afghanistan or Iraq) and gained the upper hand in the civil war. U.S. meddling in Syria has empowered the Islamic State that now controls much of Syria and Iraq.

    *She has been an unremitting supporter of Israeli aggression, whenever it occurs. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz described her last year as “Israel’s new lawyer” given her sympathetic view of Binyamin Netanyahu’s 2014 bombardment of Gaza and even his desire to maintain “security” throughout the occupied West Bank. She postured as an opponent of Israel’s unrelenting, illegal settlements of Palestinian territory in 2009, but backed down when Netanyahu simply refused to heed U.S. calls for a freeze. In her memoir she notes “our early, hard line on settlements didn’t work”—as though she’s apologizing for it.

    In 1999 as First Lady, Hillary Clinton hugged and kissed Yassir Arafat’s wife Suha during a trip to the West Bank. She advocated the establishment of a Palestinian state. She changed her tune when she ran for the New York Senate seat. When it comes to the Middle East, she is a total, unprincipled opportunist.

    *Hillary tacitly endorsed the military coup against elected Honduran president Manuel Zelaya in 2009, refusing to call it such (even though Obama did). She made common cause with those who feared his effort to poll the people about constitutional reform would weaken their positions, made nice with the ensuing regime and made sure Zelaya would not return to office.

    *She provoked China by siding with Japan in the Senkaku/ Daioyutai dispute. Departing from the State Department’s traditional stance that “we take no position” on the Sino-Japanese dispute about sovereignty over the Senkaku/ Daioyutai islands in the East China Sea, seized by Japan in 1895, Clinton as secretary of state emphasized that the islands fall within the defense perimeters of the U.S.-Japanese alliance. The warmongering neocon National Review in a piece entitled “In Praise of Hillary Clinton” praised her for “driving the Chinese slightly up a wall.”

    *She helped bring down a Japanese prime minister who heeded the feelings of the people of Okinawa, who opposed the Futenma Marine Corps Air Force Station on the island. The new prime minister Yukio Hatoyama, whose Democratic Party of Japan defeated the slavishly pro-U.S. Liberal Democratic Party in the general election of 2009, had promised to move the hated U.S. base in the heart of Ginowan city for the noise, air pollution and public safety hazards it causes. Clinton met with him, listened sympathetically, and said “no.” Hatoyama was obliged to apologize to the people of Okinawa, essentially conceding that Japan remains an occupied nation that doesn’t enjoy sovereignty. Nationwide his public support ratings fell from 70 to 17% and he was obliged to resign in shame after eight months in office.

    *She made countless trips to India, signing bilateral economic and nuclear cooperation agreements with a country her husband had placed under sanctions for its nuclear tests in 1998. While castigating North Korea for its nuclear weapons program, and taking what a CIA analyst called a “more hard line, more conditional, more neoconservative [approach] than Bush during the last four years of his term,” she signaled that India’s nukes were no longer an issue for the U.S. India is, after all, a counterweight to China.

What can those who revere her point to in this record that in any way betters the planet or this country? Clinton’s record of her tenure in the State Department is entitled Hard Choices, but it has never been hard for Hillary to choose brute force in the service of U.S. imperialism and its controlling 1%.

This is a country of 323 million people. 88% of those over 25 have graduated high school. The world respects U.S. culture, science, and technology. Why is it that out of our well-educated, creative masses the best that the those who decide these things—the secretive cliques within the two official, indistinguishable political parties who answer to the 1% and who decide how to market electoral products—can come up with is the likely plate of candidates for the presidential election next year? Why is it that, while we all find it ridiculous that North Korea’s ruled by its third Kim, Syria by its second Assad, and Cuba by its second Castro, the U.S. electorate may well be offered a choice between another Clinton and another Bush? As though their predecessors of those surnames were anything other than long-discredited warmongering thugs?

GARY LEUPP

http://novorossia.today/i-urged-him-to-bomb-the-warmongering-record-of-hillary-clinton/


Gaddafi's 2011 Prophesy: "Europe Will Turn Black" (Video)
Transcript of this Russian documentary video (towards end of the post) indicates that Gaddafi was extremely generous

COMMENT

It took me forever go get through this article.

I don't know how much I'll remember.

That's an 'impressive' record.

Japan is occupied.

I thought it was disgusting how nobody cares about the targets of capitalist aggression abroad and that it is just a focus on how the capitalist sponsored politicians haven't protected the State Department (foreign office) and CIA figures deployed abroad to bring about regime change.   I guess that's what happens when you have public deluged by 24/7 propaganda from media that is in the control of only six large corporations; and, therefore, a public that's dumbed down by capitalist propaganda, capitalist indoctrination and capitalist-owned media self-serving censorship.

The distances also don't help. It's very hard to relate to things that are so far away and so alien.

I'm not sure that I relate to this stuff in any enduring emotional way.  I think it's just an intellectual recognition of what I consider to be wrong: aggression and exploitation by capitalists committed against weaker nations, costing the exploited Western domestic masses, under the rule of capitalist oligarchy, generations of paying off tax debt and interest to bankers -- bankers, who are are among the benefiting capitalist profiteers who sucking up the profits of warmongering, while the costs of the aggression of Western private enterprise are 'socialised' by being assigned to the American (and allied) public.

Even so, I did find myself getting angry reading this. Particularly at the deceit and the degree of capitalist exploitation and control.

For example, attacking Gaddafi even though he was closely cooperating with the capitalists.

It isn't just the Middle East that the US and allied capitalists are destroying ... with the eager help of Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power: they have destroyed Yugoslavia; Serbia; Ukraine and have set their sights on destroying Russia, which is why they have tried to rob Russia of a port Russia has held since 1783 (Sevastopol, Crimea) and why the capitalists are circling Russia, despite their deceitful assurances under Bush senior.
Ukraine itself did not exist until the end of the Bolshevik revolution:  this is Russian Empire territory (and remains Russian and Slavic, in my firmly pro-Slavic opinion ... LOL) and Russian is a language spoken in the region for many centuries.
I wish I had a better memory. It's very hard for me to keep everything in mind.

The author, Gary Leupp, may be the American academic.  Although the article did not specify, I assume it is Gary P. Leupp, as it is an uncommon name:

Gary P. Leupp
Associate Professor of History at Tufts University
holds secondary appointment in Dept. of Religion
author: 'Servants, Shophands, and Laborers in the Cities of Tokugawa Japan' (1992)


Listening


Like this mix ... nice.


October 01, 2016

SYRIA: US CAPITALISTS THREATEN TO SIC TERRORISTS ON RUSSIA





ministry of tokyo






C A P I T A L I S T S
SIC TERRORIST
PROXIES ON RUSSIA


'US has always been main sponsor of Islamic State' - former CIA contractor to RT

The US claim that Russian troops will go home in body bags if Moscow doesn't end its Aleppo offensive is absurd, former CIA contractor Steven Kelley told RT. He said Russia is the only answer to defeating ISIS. Other experts also weigh in on the subject.

When asked about State Department spokesperson John Kirby's warning that Russia “will continue to send troops home in body bags” if it doesn't put an end to the offensive, Kelley said Washington is pretending to be fighting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) when it isn't doing so at all.

“The US has always been the main sponsor and creator of Daesh (Arabic acronym for IS), so this charade that they are having anything to do with fighting Daesh in Syria is completely a farce, and I think the rest of the world is smart enough to realize that everything that comes out of the mouth of John Kirby or any of the State Department personnel is complete and utter balderdash,” Kelley said.

continued
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/361033-syria-russia-us-kerry/

http://archive.is/NDcwz



[ 2014 - Ukraine left out ]
*not checked for more / possible more

C A P I T A L I S T S
SIC TERRORIST
PROXIES ON RUSSIA
Ventriloquism
about ‘body bags'
LMAO at choice of words ... John Kirby looks like a ventriloquist's dummy.

C A P I T A L I S T S
SIC TERRORIST
PROXIES ON RUSSIA
Russian FM spox: US talk of ‘attacks in Russia, body bags, downing jets’ sounds like ‘get ’em’ call


Russian FM Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova hit back at her US counterpart John Kirby, who warned that terrorist attacks may take place in Russia if the civil war continues in Syria. His remark sounds like a call to “get ’em,” she noted.

to bankers continued
https://www.rt.com/news/361032-zakharova-kirby-syria-body-bags-attacks/

http://archive.is/ZfMaO


EXTRACT

I will say that we are well informed on where in Syria, including in Aleppo Province, and exactly how many ‘unadvertised' specialists are engaged in operational planning and commanding the militants."

... if there are attempts to make good on these threats, it is far from being a fact that the militants will have either body bags or time to save their skins," he added.

Kirby's statements coincide with the release of an interview with Abu Al Ezz, a field commander of the former Nusra Front, a terrorist organization that now brands itself under the title "Jabhat Fateh al-Sham."

Yes, the US supports the opposition [in Syria], but not directly. They support the countries that support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support," Abu Al Ezz told the Koelner Stadt-Anzeiger newspaper.

... White House rhetoric indicates that there remains a very high risk for all-out war between Russia and the US.

...  recent US air strike on Assad's forces, that resulted in a Daesh advance, was intentional.

... the US military repeatedly paints Russia as its primary and ongoing military threat, and, using Moscow as its excuse, consistently demands an "enormously expanded budget" and more "extremely expensive weapons."

US Navy ships in the vicinity of Russian territory are a direct threat, she says, and these provocations have become the Pentagon's favourite game, considering its support for unreliable violent religious fundamentalists in Syria.

And throughout this military gamesmanship, the ongoing Syrian civil war worsens, spinning out of control ...

Islamic terrorists in Syria, including Daesh and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (Jabhat al-Nusra)  ...

... are driven by the religious doctrine of Wahhabism

involves 'fatwas' (decrees / opinions by mufti/leader of religion) = demand or law unto followers

Any fatwa can be issued.

https://sputniknews.com/military/20161001/1045892045/body-bags-war-russia-usa.html




Russia, Iran, China (and whoever wants to) should band together for total war on the thieving capitalist oppressors of the downtrodden European public in the West and of target nations abroad.
Lying, colluding imperialists that are stealing from the poor in home countries, to splashing out on what is the destruction of sovereign states abroad (by arm's-lengthy proxy arrangement), that entails putting the domestic public into bondage to bankers for generations
The capitalist overlords piss away money abroad on destruction of nations, for the enrichment of their wealthy friends and supporters.  Meanwhile, they fail to provide for the material and physical welfare of those they are elected to represent.


[RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE, 'NEW TAB']

September 17, 2016

Planet Tokyo | Balkan Beats







Planet Tokyo

THE IRON GATE
Dunav | Danube
WWI (1914-1918)


DUNAV



Railroad bridge over the Sava at Belgrade wrecked by the Serbians in endeavoring to prevent the capture of the city by the Germans.

The loss of the central zone of Serbia, the region traversed by the Belgrade-Salonica railway could not be long deferred.

On October 23d the Germans forced the passage of the Danube at Orsova, near the western entrance to the famous defile [narrow pass] known as the Iron Gate, and straight-way opened the stream for navigation between Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria, so that a great number of steamers and barges laden with ammunition and supplies for the allies of the Central Powers in the Near East proceeded on their way.

The Germans and Bulgarians gained contact in northeastern Serbia on October 26th, but an effective union of the two armies was not secured until about November 4th.

... October 23d the passage of the Drina, which separates Serbia from Bosnia, was forced by the Austro-Hungarians near Vishegrad ..."


Title: 'The Great war' (1915)
Allen, Whitehead, Chadwick & ors

DUNAV
Latin:  Dānuvius (old European river name)
from Proto-Indo European *dānu
other root names:  Don, Donets, Dzvina, Duna, Dysna, Dnieper, Dniestre

Sanskrit:  dānu means 'fluid, drop'
(sacred language Hinduism / see Aryan migrations)



ārya
Vedic Indic
migrated to Indian subcont. 1500 BC
Sanskrit 'ārya' cognate with Iranian 'arya' (self-designation)
both Sanskrit & Iranian descend from ārya
which was used by Indo-Iranian tribes
from source of 'Iran' (meaning: 'Kingdom of the Aryans')
on Aryan migration to India
Aryan language = ascendency over local language
[Cristian Violatti]


in Avestan:  means 'river'
Avestan - aka Zend
an East Iranian language | Old Iranian | Zoroastrian scripture
closely related to Old Persian & to some extent: Vedic Sanskrit

perhaps:  dānu in Scythian as in Avestan was a generic word for "river"

Serbian: Dunav
([Дунав])
Serbo-Croatian: Dunav / Дунав ([dǔnaʋ] or [dǔnaːʋ];
Ukrainian: Дунай Dunai ([duˈnɑj])
Slovak: Dunaj ([ˈdunaj])
Upper Sorbian: Dunaj
Bavarian: Doana
German: Donau
Silesian: Důnaj
Bulgarian: Дунав Dunav ([ˈdunɐf])
Romanian: Dunărea ([ˈdunəre̯a])
Hungarian: Duna ([ˈdunɒ])


Latin name is masculine (Rhine also)
German Donau is feminine (suffix -ouwe 'wetland')


source | wikipedia


DUNAV, BEOGRAD, SERBIA
[photo:  Vladimir Nolic]

 


ROMA

Vojasa O dilo
I could get right into this band.
The feel is very nice.
Aven Aven
I love the energy of this.

more by Vojasa

I keep getting interrupted, doing my thing.  Pisses me off.   Zoning out to music and whatever I'm looking at, at the time, is my perfect space.



BALKAN


This one sounds like gypsy surf-crossed-action music.
Very nice.  I love the long sounds combined with the percussion.

Ne Siam Kurve Tuke Sijam Prostitutke
(Balkan Maniac Remix)
song title translation something like:
'not whores, prostitutes'


Reggae generally not my thing, but this is nice
I like this a lot.
I like the lilting sort of effects (followed by a nice long drag), and the bigness of it.

 SERBIAN


 Beogradjanka Kolo
hard switching to mellow pace
/ needs volume amping up

Mile Kitic Serbia Sampanjac
this will grow on me

I'm getting hooked on this one, Serbia

I like the up tempo parts

Mesechina (Serbia)
this is nice, but I'm hooked on the Goran Bregovic high-energy version


S L A V

S E R B I A N

E  U  R  O  P  E  A  N

PROUD WHITE MAN

REVILED BY CAPITALIST-CONTROLLED
MEDIA & INTELLIGENTSIA

SERBIAN PEASANT SOLDIER


Wonder how the capitalist intelligentsia 'feminist' super-girls fared in WWI, plebs?



FEMINIST POWER


RULING CAPITALISM'S 'FEMINIST' FACE

DECEIT & PROPAGANDA

'FEMINIST'
UNITED NATIONS
CAPITALIST INDOCTRINATION & DIVESTMENT ORGAN

 [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE]
U.N. CAMPAIGNS AGAINST RAPE IN WAR
WHILE PARTNERING & LENDING FRAUDULENT 'LEGITIMACY' TO US-ANGLO CAPITALIST WAR-CRIMINAL WARMONGERING
&  WHILE PARTNERING IN THE FACILITATION OF THE INVASION OF EUROPE AND RAPE OF EUROPEAN WOMEN AND CHILDREN BY THIRD WORLD HORDES
  THEREFORE THE U.N. BEING PARTY TO THE COMMISSION OF DECADES OF RAPES OF EUROPEAN WOMEN AND CHILDREN & TO GENOCIDE OF EUROPEANS.
HAS THE U.N. CONDEMNED ANYONE YET ...?
... oh, wait ... the U.N. is part of the US-Anglo Criminal Supranational organisations under capitalist control (in matters of invasion and rape, at least).



DECEIT & PROPAGANDA


DECEIT & PROPAGANDA


DECEIT & PROPAGANDA

*This is just the tip of an iceberg across Western nations.



FOR EVIDENCE OF

1.  INDOCTRINATION 
2.  ABSENCE OF 'FEMINIST' SENTIMENTS

A.  CAPITALIST FACILITATION OF RAPE OF EUROPEAN WOMEN, OVER DECADES OF THE SAME INVASION AND RAPE POLICY.

B.  THE TRUTH OF WOMEN'S SELF-DEFENCE 'CAPABILITIES' IN MASS RAPED EUROPE.


RAPED WHOLESALE IN EUROPE BY
INVADERS IN A PROGRAM OF INVASION
IMPLEMENTED BY CAPITALISTS & PUPPET POLITICIANS
OF CAPITALIST-RAPED EUROPE.

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE COMMITTED BY RULING CAPITALISTS.



THE PROUD AND INDEPENDENT SERBIAN WARRIOR
on whose ancestors
CAPITALIST MERCENARY WAR CRIMINAL NATO HIGH-TECH COWARDS DROPPED GRAFFITI BOMBS IN YET ANOTHER ILLEGAL US-ANGLO CAPITALIST WAR
HAD DIGNITY
AND DID NOT STAND BY OR FACILIATATE
THE INVASION OF HIS HOMELAND
OR PERMIT THE RAPE OF HIS WOMEN & CHILDREN
AND WOULD HAVE HAD DIGNITY ENOUGH
NOT TO BE A USEFUL IDIOT IN THE CAPITALIST WAR AND DIVESTMENT MACHINE'S PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN
CAPITALIST-SPONSORED MILITARY EUNUCHS
IN HIGH HEELS, MAKING DECLARATIONS OF COMMITMENT  TO CAPITALIST-SPUN PROPAGANDA 'FEMINISM'
WHILE LETTING EUROPEAN WOMEN AND CHILDREN GET RAPED BY INVADERS AS THEY ARE DIVESTED OF THEIR HOMELANDS

E U N U C H S
US-ANGLO RULING CAPITALIST
GELDED
MULTI-KULTI
GENDER UNDETERMINED
NATION DIVESTED
CAPITALIST-BOUGHT EUNUCHS AND EUNUCH MILITARY SERVANTS
WHOSE MASTERS HIDE THEIR CORRUPTION AND WAR CRIMES BEHIND THE CAPITALIST POWER SECURING DECEIT THAT IS THE SHIELD OF SO-CALLED 'NATIONAL SECURITY' (WHICH IS NOTHING BUT SHIELD OF CORRUPT & GREEDY CAPITALIST INTERESTS)

EUNUCHS WHOSE MASTERS DIVEST THE PEOPLE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE NATIONS AND OF THEIR NATIONHOOD:   AS WELL AS DESTROYING THEIR IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL SAFETY AND SECURITY, THE C*NTS.

E U N U C H S
WHO DO NOT EVEN PROTECT THE F*CKING STREETS, SUBURBS OR HOMES
OF THEIR
NATIONS-TURNED-CAPITALIST-CATTLE-STATIONS
AS
CAPITALIST IMPORTED
THIRD WORLD WARLORDS TERRORIZE
THE HOSTAGE PUBLIC

PRISONERS OF UNDECLARED WAR
THAT ARE VICTIMS OF CROSS-RACIAL RANDOM STABBINGS, SHOOTINGS, KILLINGS, RAPES, ASSAULTS, HOME-INVASIONS, CARJACKINGS, ROBBERIES, HAMMER ATTACKS, MACHETE ATTACKS, AXE ATTACKS, BRAWLS, RIOTS ETC, THAT THE NATION AND PUBLIC SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO

WHILE THE RULING CAPITALIST ELITE MAINTAINS A PROGRAM OF INVASION
ALONG WITH A PROGRAM OF TOTALITARIAN MASS SURVEILLANCE

DUE TO THE SIDE-EFFECTS
OF THEIR PROGRAM OF INVASION

 AND DUE TO THE BLOW-BACK FROM THEIR PROGRAM OF AGGRESSION ABROAD

BUT MOSTLY DUE TO CAPITALIST-SERVING GOVERNMENT AIMING TO KEEP IRON-GRIP CONTROL OF THE CATTLE THAT IS THE CONSUMER AND TAX SLAVE PUBLIC BEING DIVESTED OF A NATION

WE KNOW IT IS MOSTLY FOR CONTROL, BECAUSE THESE C*NTS AND THEIR EUROPEAN UNION COUNTERPARTS HAVE SHOWN THEMSELVES TO, IN FACT, ACTIVELY AND DELIBERATELY ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY

AS THEY USURP AND DESTROY NATIONS OF INFORMATION-CENSORED, DECEIVED, INDOCTRINATED, AND POLITICALLY SUPPRESSED DISSENTING EUROPEANS.

MASS SURVEILLANCE
CONDUCTED BY THE COLLUDING, CAPITALIST-SERVING 'INTELLIGENCE SERVICES' ORGANS OF US-ANGLO LED CAPITALISTS

US, UK, CANADIAN, NEW ZEALAND & AUSTRALIAN

WHO HAVE COLLUDED TO POLITICALLY PERSECUTE AND IMPRISON FOR 6 YEARS WITHOUT CHARGE, AN AUSTRALIAN JOURNALIST WHO MADE PUBLIC THEIR
COLLECTIVE WAR CRIMES

  'HUMAN RIGHTS' LAWYERS

WESTERN INTELLIGENTSIA HYPOCRITES & SPONSORED LIARS
AND:  CAPITALIST-CONTROLLED MEDIA THAT IS PARTY TO THIS DECEIT
ARE CONTEMPTIBLE FILTH.


US-ANGLO
CAPITALIST
H.E.L.L.


IDEOLOGICAL LIES
CAPITALIST
R O B B E R Y


'WHITE MEN' were good enough to sacrifice their lives in wars of the US-ANGLO CAPITALIST EMPIRE


DID EUROPEAN MAN DIE IN CAPITALIST WARS SO HIS
ANCESTRAL HERITAGE

WOULD BE STOLEN
and bestowed on aliens by

US-ANGLO CAPITALISM

I N S U R R E C T I O N

F I N A L  C A L L

OAK TREE AT TAKOVO


site of:  Miloš Obrenović, Serbian
CALL FOR FINAL INSURRECTION
against Turks, 1815-1817
"...  in the depths of a dense and dark oak forest with century-old trees, in front of a hidden wooden church in Takovo, the elected Serbian leader Miloš Obrenović addressed a large gathered crowd ..."   wikipedia | Serbian

SERBIAN REBELS
  • Miloš Obrenović
  • Jovan Obrenović
  • Milić Drinčić
  • Jovan Dobrača
  • Petar Nikolajević Moler
  • Stanoje Glavaš
  • Stojan Čupić
  • Sima Nenadović
  • Sima Katić
  • Toma Vučić

ALL I SEE ABOVE IS THE MALIGNED WHITE MALE
... ALAS, NO 'FEMINISTS'
Serbian independence not gained until after victory of
RUSSIAN EMPIRE

Russo-Turkish War 1877-1878

Takovo
Takovo is a village
municipality of Gornji Milanovac, Serbia
2002 census:   population of 493 people

Second Serbian Uprising

under the leadership of Miloš Obrenović
started in this village

18.09.2016

Weather: 27°C, Wind NW at 5 km/h, 45% Humidity
Local time: Saturday 5:47 pm

source | google

BULGARIA

Тих бял Дунав
'Still White Danube Undulates'
aka Botev March


I am a Bulgarian vojvoda,
And these are all my men.
We are speeding now for freedom,
Let us spill blood today.

Slavic title: 'vojvoda' - lit. 'war leader' - warlord - commander of military force.

c. 1550 ... 
"a Russian Voyevoda was an official with both civil and military powers. He was originally a military commander but on the frontier, civil and military could not easily be separated."  [wikipedia]


This Bulgarian song is lovely.  I love the masculinity and strength of the voices.  And there's history, as well.   Perfect.

More history below.  

Germans have a wonderful sense of humour.

BYE BYE, EMPIRE
CHARLIE & HIS ORCHESTRA