European Immigration & the Corporate Empire Warmonger Agenda Collateral Destruction of Europe Supporting Left

ꕤ Article SOURCE https://archive.is/8UT5V#selection-1745.1-1957.13 Original Source https://npd.de/union-und-spd-versagen-in-der-asylkrise/ GOOGLE TRANSLATED {German to English} NPD National Democratic Party of Germany (Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands) Website http://www.npd.de/ [access via Tor Browser, if blocked] Union and SPD failures in the asylum crisis Ronny Zasowk In recent weeks and months, it became clear that the Union and the SPD have no concept of how to obtain the unprecedented asylum crisis under control. The head of the Berlin State Office for Health and Social Affairs (LaGeSo), Franz Allert is now resigned because locally prevailing chaotic conditions for months. Asylum seekers camp out in front of authority, crime and littering are spreading. But Allert is just a pawn, responsible for the disaster are the politicians in the Bundestag and the Federal Government. They roll the responsibility off to the lower levels. Currently running the Federal Congress of the SPD, in a few days will begin the national party of the CDU. The delegates of the SPD were at the three-day party meeting already approve the brand hazardous Syria Bundeswehr [armed forces] deployment later, although a contrary vote would have had no real political significance, as the use, by the threat of Islamist terrorist attacks in Germany has increased considerably, even a few days ago has begun. The SPD refuses to speak out on their party for a ceiling on asylum seekers. According to SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel, there should be no limit, but a slowdown in the influx. The SPD leadership is in favor of receiving quotas for all EU Member States. This would facilitate the integration, so Gabriel. The SPD it is therefore not temporary shelter for victims of political persecution, but a permanent right to remain for those who are making their way to Germany and Europe. For the coming years is expected to further million[s] [of] immigrants. The CDU Board will present to the Congress on Sunday commencing a main motion, which is same as in the SPD is no question of an upper limit for asylum seekers. Both Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière as well as the deputy CDU leader Armin Laschet now defended this course on the grounds that a fundamental right can not have a upper limit. Because the CDU leadership to Chancellor Angela Merkel, but know that it rumbles at the party base and many members do not want to follow the irresponsible course of Merkel in asylum policy, the CDU Board will decide that immigrants should be required by law to integration. The CDU seems to have left the earth. Such a legal obligation would be integration not worth the paper on which they would be. By millions of immigration to Germany foreign conflicts and crime are imported, which can no longer get to grips with the German police because of increasingly apparent library staff shortage. The large share of immigrants is no longer registered at the borders, asylum seekers leave their assigned accommodations and travel to other provinces, for months there in the municipalities a hardly be surpassed asylum Chaos - who now comes along with integration laws and refuses to immigration at last to stop, did not recognize the seriousness of the situation. The NPD wants no quotas, no better distribution and no slowdown in immigration - German absorption capacities have long exceeded.  We want the reintroduction of effective border management, an immediate stop immigration and the deportation of all rejected asylum seekers.  Also criminal foreigners and Islamists have to leave our country and must be punished with a lifelong entry ban. Ronny Zasowk Source https://archive.is/8UT5V#selection-1745.1-1957.13 Original Source https://npd.de/union-und-spd-versagen-in-der-asylkrise/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT SPD are supposed to be the 'left', but they serve the agenda of globalists ... as do all mainstream 'left' political parties, I would guess. Sigmar Gabriel sounds like he's not my cup of tea, at all.  Why is he on the 'left' if he's serving the interests of corporate empire warmongers, to the detriment of Europeans?  The mainstream 'left' stands with the neocons and acts as co-supporter of neocon agenda. Gabriel backed Afghanistan occupation multiple times (judging by his Wikipedia entry), and now he backs an invasion of Europe  -- enabling Turkey, Saudis, Qatar, Jordan, Israel and the West to continue their proxy war against Assad and Syria in the Middle East. SPD's in favour of quotas for all European member states, so they're keen to spread the chaos around all of Western Europe -- on a permanent basis (be it in Germany or in the EU), guaranteed to destroy Europe. Temporary shelter basis is rejected by the SPD in favour of assuming a permanent and virtually irrevocable problem, unless SPD's planning on a future civil war remedy. Shelter on European soil is just about as moronic an option as permanent settlement, save that its not as enduring as FOREVER.  Or, until the next civil war gets under-way in Europe.  Why can't any of these twits wrap their minds around a strictly no-entry policy that demands corporate warmongers (no, not taxpayers) pay for in situ (off shore) shelter & support for populations they have displaced and continue to displace conducting wars on behalf of interests of bankers, corporates and elites? CDU to decide if immigrants require integration?  What a joke.  How's that going to work, much like it 'worked' in the past?  The Guardian  ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. In my view, the notion of 'integration' is missing the point altogether when the subject is mass immigration (rather than the rare, occasional foreigner). There is no possibility 'integration' of that which is non-German with German, or  that which is non-European with European, without the disintegration of that which is German or European. That which is German is distinctly German, with a distinct history, heritage and tribal properties.  Likewise for the rest of Europe. So if you think about it, any proposed large-scale 'integration' is disintegration of what is distinctly German and/or  European in substance.  Otherwise, it is a proposal for continued invasion of Europe, with a view to formation of a parallel, non-assimilable non-European body of peoples in European nations.  In my view, both scenarios ('assimilation' / European disintegration or parallel existence (however surface 'assimilated' ... or not, judging by history)) amount to THE SAME loss of integrity and threat to continued survival of European peoples. The only difference is the speed of the demise of the European peoples. Bear in mind, Europeans are looking at large numbers of foreigners (rather than the occasional individual outsider absorption -- or, what ought to be absorption, were it not for fashionable notions of relativism). If arguments to destroy Europe are based on the idea of non-Europeans possessing 'fundamental rights' that trump the rights of European native peoples, Europe needs to exit any 'fundamental rights' treaties or understandings it has entered into. The only fundamental right that matters at the end of the day is the fundamental right of Europeans to a European homeland and to continued existence of fundamentally European nations, as free European peoples (rather than politically hobbled, out-group-minority-ruled, polarised, politically and otherwise suppressed, diluted, foreign-merged, disintegrated, and eventually demographically threatened and destined for extinction peoples). Egalitarian notions are well and good in theory, but on the ground reality negates the pretty sentiments put forward for what is essentially set to usher in European suicide.  The above are my present thoughts on the subject of non-European mass immigration, and are in no way connected to views of the NDP on the subject (which I'm yet to examine). Many will disagree with me, particularly those in former colonies which are comprised of disparate immigrant populations.  But Europe and the European people are distinct from the artificial settlements formed in the colonies. Going by the above article, the NPD German nationalist party does not want any more non-assimilable non-Germans invading Germany -- a Germany that is already flooded by a sustained immigrant invasion that has resulted in crime and mayhem (among other associated enrichment), that even the German  law enforcement authorities can no longer contain. And this continues to be facilitated by the German government and the mainstream German pseudo 'opposition' parties:  where history has clearly shown that 'integration' of such immigration has been an utter failure. Oh, the NPD wants deportation of radical Islamists, along with a life-long entry (return to Germany) ban. Wow, how heinous of them to suggest such a rational solutions to the NATO and European Union driven agenda that's causing collateral destruction of Germany and of Europe. Well, that's what I got out of this.  ꕤ

GAZA - Israel lobbying Germany for checkpoint guards - Germanys Christian Democrats want disarmement of Hamas

German approval for Gaza mission Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has called on Germany to lead a control mission on the borders of the Gaza Strip. Politicians in Berlin say they can imagine giving their approval. Politicians from various parties can imagine Germany participating in a mission to control the Rafah checkpoint between the Gaza Strip and Egypt. "I personally believe that it's our duty, and that we must not turn a blind eye to what's going on," said Reinhold Robbe, the chairman of the German-Israeli community and a former parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces. "Germany has a special responsibility because of its history."  [What?  Is this exploiting a German guilt trip? Or am I missing the point?  And what's wrong with the US?  Why don't *they* stand guard?] Lieberman wants German leadership European border guards have controlled the Rafah checkpoint before. The first European Union Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Rafah went from 2005 to 2007, after Israel ended its occupation of the Gaza Strip. But the European Union ended the mission after Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections in 2006 and took control of Gaza in 2007. Over the past few days, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his counterparts in France and the United Kingdom have hinted at the possibility of taking up control of the crossing once again. Israel's foreign minister Lieberman sees Germany as 'Europe's leading political nation' [Flattery will get you anywhere.] The idea was welcomed by Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman in an interview with the German mass-circulation broadsheet Bild: The EU should "send inspectors that control trade between Gaza and its neighbors," he told the newspaper, adding that because of its "role as a politically leading nation in Europe" Germany ought to "assume responsibility as the leader of such a mission." Fresh escalation would have to be prevented by all means, Lieberman added. The question was "how to make sure that Hamas doesn't collect its terrorist strengths again and smuggle new weapons into the country." In an article to be published Friday in Bild, Steimeier said that he could see Germany having a role in Gaza following Israel's monthlong war there. "Together with our European partners, we are ready to make a contribution, for example with an EU monitoring mission of the border crossing," Steinmeier told Bild. "We are holding intensive talks with all sides to work out what would be necessary for this," he added.  [Partners?  Where have I heard that before?  Oh, yes, the US is big on 'partnerships'.] ... Will all sides agree? It remains unclear what Hamas thinks of the idea and whether Egypt would even agree to open the checkpoint. Leaders in Cairo have taken a tough stance on Islamists within Egypt, and they want to see Hamas isolated internationally. "The condition for Germany to take part is that all sides agree," said Niels Annen, the spokesman on foreign policy affairs for the Social Democrats (SPD). The news agency Reuters quoted deputy SPD group chairman Rolf Mützenich as saying that a relatively safe environment would have to be guaranteed and that that was not the case at the moment. Robbe, the president of the German-Israeli community, favors a UN mandate for such a mission. It was important to have military protection, he said: "I'm not sure it would be enough to send customs officials supported by ordinary policemen," Robbe told German public radio Deutschlandfunk. Roderich Kiesewetter, a security expert for Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats, said that "having German soldiers on the ground is not an option because that would be unacceptable for Israel." Philipp Missfelder (CDU) wants Germany to help Israel disarm radical groups.  [Good luck.] The SPD's Annen said he still believes that opening the checkpoint under international control is the right way to go. "If you keep up the blockade, there will only be more tunnels in future," he warned. Members of the opposition Left party have already signaled their approval, even if the faction has traditionally been critical of German security forces' missions abroad. "If the EU can help, it should do so," Left foreign policy expert Stefan Liebich said. And he added that he would support Germany's doing its share of the work. Philipp Missfelder, of the CDU, suggested that Germany go a step further. "A control mission could help disarm radical groups in the Gaza Strip," he said.

Why are these foreigners interested in getting involved in the internal affairs of Palestine - ie the Hamas disarmament factor?

How long are foreigners expected to be checkpoint guards? 

Why are the Palestinians even corralled off on a tiny slither of land?

And good luck with the Christian Democrat plan on disarming Hamas.