TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Seymour Hersh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Seymour Hersh. Show all posts

December 26, 2015

US Propaganda or US Military 'Backchannel' Communication?


SYRIA



Related Article below:


Seymour Hersh
Source:  Military Advised White House Against
"Assad Must Go" Policy
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/327017-hersh-interview-us-syria/


Seymour Hersh
Investigative Reporter

"There was an ambassador named Robert Ford who was a really I thought sort of crossed the line as an ambassador, because when  ...  he was the ambassador for the US to Syria in Damascus, and when the demonstrations began in early 2011, he actually would go to rallies where the opposition was and urged them to carry on ..."

RT News Reporter

"Well, we know that [the US] embassy had been working actively to support the opposition, thanks to WikiLeaks."

Seymour Hersh
Investigative Reporter

"Yes, absolutely.  Although most Americans don't know that.

I did write about it, but most Americans still don't know about it."


---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

I'm having trouble following what is going on (here and in some other article I looked at).

The US wants to bring down Assad and has aimed to do so since 2006 or earlier, the US arms and supports Islamist terrorists, the US refuses to co-operate with the Assad government re the ISIS terrorists ... but the US military supposedly (in opposition to the Obama administration) sends word via third parties (Russia, Israel and someone else, I think it was), providing information in order to assist the Assad government in their fight against ISIS terrorists?

Why do I have trouble believing any of this?

Maybe I'm tired, but none of this computes. 






December 05, 2015

Syria: British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) - Fraud

Video | Transcript
BBC FRAUD - SYRIA



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

☢ 
Transcript
[ Confirm Audio / Video For Quotation Purposes ]
The Truth Seeker
Daniel Bushell
RT News

Daniel Bushell
RT News
Stunning fakery in the alleged chemical weapons attack, according to a former UK ambassador.

Coming up.

Other narration:

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is accused of staging chemical weapons attack.
The CIA admits planting CNN reporters.
And international lawyers call for journalists inciting violence to be expelled.

Daniel Bushell
RT News

August 2013.

NATO leaders can't get the public on side for the imminent bombing of Syria.

Suddenly, BBC says it was filming a small rural hospital and a game-changing atrocity happens right there, the moment they were filming.

CUTS TO FILM CLIP:  'Syria Crisis', Ian Pannell, BBC (August, 2013)

BBC Narrator
Ian Pannell

"... we were filming the doctors working at this hospital when victims of an incendiary bomb attack on a school playground started pouring in."

CUTS TO FILM CLIP:  'Syria Crisis', Ian Pannell, BBC (August, 2013)
Female - [kitted up in dramatic face-mask]

"Absolute chaos and carnage here. It must be some sort of napalm."

[At issue:  BBC footage August 2013 vs BBC Footage September 2013]

Daniel Bushell
RT News

But a highly sceptical public stayed hostile to military intervention.

Exactly one month later, the leaders are trying to pin a chemical weapons attack on Syria, without success.

The BBC airs exactly the same footage, but digitally alters the word 'napalm' for 'chemical weapons', hoping no-one will notice.

CUTS TO FILM CLIP:  'Saving Syria's Children', Ian Pannell, BBC (September, 2013)
Female - [kitted up in dramatic face-mask]

"Absolute chaos and carnage here. It must be some sort of chemical weapon."

Daniel Bushell
RT News

Not only did folks notice, but it's unleashed a massive public investigation which made some extremely disturbing findings.


Robert Stuart

This is the total fabrication, from beginning to end, of an atrocity, with BBC 'reporter' Ian Pannell standing amidst a tableau of very bad actors.  This is completely beyond the pale'.


Daniel Bushell
RT News

This audio analysis by media investigator Robyn Upton shows both versions [of BBC audio] are identical and from the same speech.

The BBC then altered the words from 'napalm' to 'chemical weapon', the EXACT justification  NATO was finding difficult prove.

That game-changing allegation was made by two doctors have travelled with the BBC, who claimed the number of sudden casualties is "overwhelming".

What kind of doctor, notes media investigator Robert Stuart, gives interviews when she is surrounded by supposedly seriously burned and dying teenagers.

Translated English overdub:

"Get anyone who isn't a patient out out of here."
Daniel Bushell
RT News

When a nurse does finally start to help, her order to "get anyone who isn't a patient out of here" doesn't apply to the cameramen.

Even worse, notes Stuart [Roberts], is the bizarre acting which starts when the man in the centre gives the sign.

'Doctor Rola', on whose sole claim the BBC sends 'napalm chemical weapons' allegations around the world is actually the daughter of Syrian rebel Mousa al-Kardi.

The parallel to the Gulf War and [the testimony of] Nurse Nayirah is stunning.

Congressmen said the nurse's tearful testimony that Iraqis were killing children swung their vote in favour of war.

[Cuts to footage of 'Nurse Nayirah' - 'Lies Pushed US to Bomb Iraq', Courtesy C-Span]


'Nurse Nayirah' tearful footage:

" ... and left the children to die on the cold floor."  [sniff, sniff]
Daniel Bushell
RT News

Nurse Nayirah became the mainstream's darling, but once the vote had safely passed, she admitted INVENTING the whole thing and was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to Washington, lying to get the public to back war.

UK Member of Parliament joins us.

Thank you very much for coming on.

Why do we get almost identical claims before each war, which then prove lies?
George Galloway
UK Member of Parliament:

Well, the 'Bush and Blair Corporation' [ie the BBC], as it became in the run-up to the Iraq war, has almost entirely lost its reputation for journalistic integrity.

A full inquiry must be lodged into why the BBC used a piece of material which was not just wrong, but was falsified and falsified with the purpose of propelling out country into war.

That's not what the British public pays its BBC licence fee for, so that it can be tricked into a war.
Daniel Bushell
RT News

In a statement, the British Broadcasting Corporation says it stands by its report.

The Syrian opposition denies the allegations.

Investigators such as Robert Stuart note there are many questions sent to the Corporation [BBC] remaining unanswered.

There are also numerous such precedents both in this war and in previous invasions.

'Brilliant' is how a top Western called tricking the public through routine faking of atrocities, commonly aired on mainstream bulletins.

Nightly news shows just a few cases of what happened next, after mainstream cameras ended their reports.
Male Voice
American
'Nightly News':

"It shows people putting on, you know, fake wounds; it shows -- look, there some guys there, there's their head wounds, peace everybody -- you know, we're doing the right thing, we're creating fake propaganda.  I mean, it's not even real atrocities so they're lined up; there's another video showing a guy kicking his leg and with a fake blood wound.  Here's a guy who wakes up from his funeral. Watch this -- oh, he's awake.  He's not even really dead.  So, I mean, this is just crazy what goes on.  There's another video that was shot of a supposed massacre and it cuts -- you don't see the whole thing.  When you go to the Al Jazeera footage it shows real quick clips of a guy kicking his leg and he's got blood coming out.  It turned out to be fake blood."
Daniel Bushell
RT News

The so-called activists behind the fakes are by far the most popular source of despite them never being verified and regularly disproved as fabrications to justify more NATO arms.

The term 'activist' may sound like a well-meaning Western campaigner or charity, but the Foreign Policy Journal notes it's just newspeak for insurgents.

The official source of Syria casualties, or what mainstream claims is official, is an impressive sounding organisation THE SYRIAN OBSERVATORY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS.

Reuters exposed the fact three (3) years ago it was not an organisation at all, or even working in Syria.

It's a single pro-insurgent supporter living in Coventry, England.

Here pictured at the Foreign Office after instructions from Britian's Foreign Minister himself.

In leaked footage, ordinary Syrians told the BBC they're tired of its lies and the insurgents they're cheer-leading are a tiny minority led by foreign gangs.
[Cuts to footage:  males challenging female American sounding journalist and asserting that Assad is widely supported by most of the 22-million Syrians and that very small minority, number in the thousands, are in opposition.]
Daniel Bushell
RT News

Pro-war media is forced to resort to colossal lies since intelligence chiefs reveal to America's top investigative reporter Sy Hersh:
"Obama's cronies are making it up.  All the evidence actually points to the jihadis staging the chemical attacks.

SY HERSH
Author:  'Whose Sarin?'
The 'attack was not the result of the current regime', the high-level intelligence officer wrote in an email to a colleague.

‘The guys are throwing their hands in the air and saying, “How can we help this guy” – Obama – “when he and his cronies in the White House make up the intelligence as they go along?”, said a former intelligence official."
Daniel Bushell
RT News

The distortion, he said, reminded him of the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
[RT on film:  'Wag the Dog', Barry Levinson, New Line Cinema (1997)]
Daniel Bushell
RT News

The thought a US President would start a horrific foreign war by staging a pretty female front as a victim made people laugh.

[Cuts to film footage]
[Film:  'Wag the Dog', Barry Levinson, New Line Cinema (1997)]

[Subsequently cuts to:

[Film:  'I Am A Ukrainian', Appleseed Entertainment (2014)]
Daniel Bushell
RT News

Meet 'Julia' (if that's her real name), the celebrated face the mass media called the creator of a viral video asking the US to help Ukraine.

It was actually created by the [US] State Department's National Endowment for Democracy (NED), to mask the fact that Washington joined Ukraine thugs and murdered their way to power.

A leaked phone call with EU Foreign [Catherine] Ashton revealed the opposite planned and executed the infamous sniper violence of Kiev, shooting both the police and their own supporters in the back.

A study found a total of 250 mainstream sources lied that the snipers belonged to Yanukovych.

Only seven (7) of the entire mass media even mentioned the bombshell leak, and those that did, framed the report to suggest it couldn't possibly be true.

Former Wall Street Journal editor, Paul Criag Roberts, called the coverage in Ukraine a new low in the history of the mainstream, which is now simply what he described as a ministry of lies.

Investigative reporter John Helmer's uncovered mainstream staging demonstrations and attempts to provoke disorder.
He joins us.

Great to speak to you.

One US scholar notes the coverage has become Orwellian.  What's going on?
John Helmer
Investigative Reporter

So the weaker your government, the more interested the leader might be in threatening Russia to look strong at home, when it's obvious he's not strong at home and couldn't get re-elected.

That's particularly true of, let's say, the French president, or Prime Minister Cameron at the moment.

Arguably President Obama is not only a lame duck, but having great difficulty in putting together a winning coalition for the Democratic Party's next candidate for president.

When you've got weak political leaders, you need to look stronger than you are in public opinion in the media.  So there's this process of misleading and disinforming.
Daniel Bushell
RT News

The Senate Committee enquiry revealed CIA running mainstream media in a vast operation known as Mockingbird.

More than 400 journalists and media chiefs claiming to watchdog the government were the exact opposite:  joining to mask US government crime at home and abroad.

The operation continues despite [CIA] agency denials.

Counterpunch discovered CIA imposing agents on firms like CNN.

Former CIA [officer] Michael Scheuer notes British media are even closer to intel targets.

Scheuer adds that BBC now takes the lead in regime change operations that cause 'anarchy' and violence.

Let's speak to Francis Boyle, professor of international law at Illinois University.

Great to talk to you.

How can nations stop war media that now perform the CIA's covert operations?

FRANCIS BOYLE
PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS

Certainly, have their visas revoked and sent packing home, because I really don't understand why some of these countries keep, you know, European journalist, certainly in the United States, why they let them into the countries; because they're just using their cover to provoke war and military intervention at home.
[Split Screen / Cut to footage:

ABCNews #ABCWorldNews - Crisis in Ukraine, Blood in the Streets

LiveCNN - Crisis in Ukraine - Breaking News - 'Putin Threatens More Military Action'  |  Anderson Cooper depicted]
In addition, Bush junior administration lifted what was supposed to be the previous prohibition that intelligence agents were not supposed to infiltrate the media.

You know, you have to be very careful, certainly dealing with US reporters, whether or not they're intelligence agents.
Daniel Bushell
RT News

[???] active units of the military, also known as Wall Street media, show how serious the situation now is.  They're policies aren't popular with their own viewers.

Mainstream audiences are in free-fall.

CNN and MSNBC have shed half their entire viewership in the last year alone.

The question is, how many more coups they will stage or help, before they lose the public's trust altogether.

Seek truth from facts.

This is the Truth Seeker.

[end audio/video]
Whose sarin?
Seymour M. Hersh

Vol. 35 No. 24 · 19 December 2013
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin





December 02, 2015

WikiLeaks - The New York Times - US Government Mediated News & Other 'Free Press' Shockers

Media
Selling Unicorns❄
Corporate-Serving Media
In Service of Aggressive Neoliberal Foreign Policy
|  Manufacturing Consent
Bias.  Compliance.  Censorship.
Disinformation.  Distraction.  Diversion. 
Suppression.  Smear.


censorship & disinformation
is denial of informed consent


Dishonourable Mentions

The New York Times

The New Yorker
The Washington Post

LINK to other Media Bad Boys | here



WikiLeaks
The New York Times

more

WikiLeaks
The New York Times 
US government mediates
its WikiLeaks redacted stories
freedom of information documents show
Source | WikiLeaks | here
USG FOI | Emails PDF |  here



other


The New York Times
published military “expert” C.J. Chivers report
purportedly based on rocket trajectories etc
& asserting gas shells could only have been fired by Syrian army positions
--> Ghouta attack
"became the pretext for a warmongering campaign by the White House and the US and European media"

--> Obama
"threatened immediate air strikes"
“Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire ... sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal."
*** "US military leadership also knew that White House claims that there could be no other source for the sarin gas than the Syrian army were false"
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html



American Media
Refusals to publish
Journalist Seymour Hersh

The New Yorker
The Washington Post
refused to publish
Seymour Hersh first report on Ghouta gas attack
US press largely silent re Hersh report
US press as at July 2014 "blacked out latest exposure"
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html



The Washington Post
The New Yorker
Refused to Publish an Article on Obama Admin Syria Lies
Michael Krieger | Posted Monday Dec 9, 2013 at 11:00 am
https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/12/09/how-the-washington-post-and-the-new-yorker-refused-to-publish-article-on-obama-admin-syria-lies/

LINK to other Media Bad Boys | here

November 27, 2015

Syria Under Attack - the Great Satan & the Little Imp, Turkey - Plus their al-Qaeda Proxies - Mayhem in the Middle East

Article
SOURCE

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html




New exposé by Seymour Hersh: Turkey staged gas attack to provoke US war on Syria

By Patrick Martin
7 April 2014
In a lengthy article published Sunday by the London Review of Books, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reports that the sarin gas attack on a Damascus suburb on August 21, 2013 was actually carried out by Syrian “rebel” forces acting at the behest of Turkey, for the purpose of providing a pretext for a US attack on Syria.

The gas attack killed many hundreds of people in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, and the Obama administration and the corporate-controlled US media immediately blamed the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad for the atrocity. The New York Times, in particular, published a lengthy analysis by its military “expert,” C. J. Chivers, which purported to show, based on rocket trajectories, prevailing winds and other technical factors, that the gas shells could only have been fired from Syrian army artillery positions.

For several weeks, the Ghouta attack became the pretext for a warmongering campaign by the White House and the US and European media. Obama threatened immediate air strikes, claiming that the Syrian government had crossed a “red line” against the use of chemical weapons, which he had laid down in 2012.

The US president then abruptly reversed himself and announced he would seek congressional approval first, only to call off any overt military action in favor of a deal brokered by Russian President Vladimir Putin in which Assad agreed to the supervised dismantling of his chemical weapons stockpiles.
By Hersh’s account, “Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal. The message that the case against Syria wouldn’t hold up was quickly relayed to the US joint chiefs of staff… As a consequence the American officers delivered a last-minute caution to the president, which, in their view, eventually led to his cancelling the attack.”

The US military leadership also knew that White House claims that there could be no other source for the sarin gas than the Syrian army were false. “The American and British intelligence communities had been aware since the spring of 2013 that some rebel units in Syria were developing chemical weapons,” Hersh reports. “On 20 June analysts for the US Defense Intelligence Agency issued a highly classified five-page ‘talking points’ briefing for the DIA’s deputy director, David Shedd, which stated that al-Nusra maintained a sarin production cell…”

Hersh quotes extensively from this US government document, which the office of the US director of national intelligence now denies ever existed:

Al-Nusrah Front’s relative freedom of operation within Syria leads us to assess the group’s CW [chemical weapons] aspirations will be difficult to disrupt in the futureTurkey and Saudi-based chemical facilitators… were attempting to obtain sarin precursors in bulk, tens of kilograms, likely for the anticipated large scale production effort in Syria.”

Hersh notes that members of al-Nusra were arrested in Turkey last May in possession of two kilograms of sarin. They were charged in a 130-page indictment with “attempting to purchase fuses, piping for the construction of mortars, and chemical precursors for sarin.” All have since been released pending trial, or had charges dropped altogether.
Those arrests followed chemical weapons attacks in Syria in March and April 2013, where a UN investigation found evidence implicating the Syrian “rebels.” One source told Hersh, “Investigators interviewed the people who were there, including the doctors who treated the victims. It was clear that the rebels used the gas. It did not come out in public because no one wanted to know.”

The “no one,” of course, was the US government, its European allies, and its UN stooges—as well as their political apologists in the media and the pseudo-left groups such as the International Socialist Organization that were either openly campaigning for military intervention in Syria or justifying it by portraying the US-financed “rebels” as the bearers of a democratic revolution.

When the August 21 attack took place, Obama ordered the Pentagon to draw up plans for bombing Syria, and, as a former intelligence official told Hersh, “the White House rejected 35 target sets provided by the joint chiefs of staff as being insufficiently ‘painful’ to the Assad regime.”

The US bombing plan ultimately envisioned “a monster strike” involving two wings of B-52 bombers equipped with 2,000-pound bombs, as well as Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from submarines and surface warships.

Hersh continues: “The new target list was meant to ‘completely eradicate any military capabilities Assad had,’ the former intelligence official said. The core targets included electric power grids, oil and gas depots, all known logistic and weapons depots, all known command and control facilities, and all known military and intelligence buildings.”

The bombing attack drawn up at the direction of the Obama White House would have itself constituted a war crime, causing thousands if not tens of thousands of casualties and crippling Syria as a functioning society.

Hersh then passes on to his most important revelation: that US officials believed the Turkish government, or its intelligence agencies, had instigated the gas attack in Ghouta.

He cites concerns among US military and intelligence leaders that “there were some in the Turkish government” who supported “dabbling with a sarin attack inside Syria—and forcing Obama to make good on his red line threat.”

This was reinforced by the British military intelligence finding on the type of gas used in Ghouta. This included a message to the Americans: “We’re being set up here.” This was followed by a further message about the Ghouta attack that “a senior official in the CIA sent in late August: ‘It was not the result of the current regime [i.e., Assad]’. UK & US know this.”

Hersh suggests that the bitter controversy over the attack on a US consulate and CIA mission in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, which killed four Americans including the ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, is directly linked to the infighting over Syria.

It has been widely reported that the CIA organized the shipment of Libyan weapons stockpiles from Benghazi to the Syrian rebels. Hersh cites a “highly classified annex” to the report of the Senate committee that investigated the Benghazi attack.

This document “described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and [Turkish] Erdogan administrations… By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.”

According to Hersh, after the Benghazi fiasco, the CIA was pulled out, but the Libya to Turkey to Syria pipeline continued, possibly includingmanpads”—portable surface-to-air missile launchers, which the Obama administration had opposed supplying the rebels out of concern that they would be used to attack civilian airliners.  
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan tasked Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT) with engineering a provocation that would give a pretext for direct US military intervention. Hersh quotes his source: “‘The MIT was running the political liaison with the rebels, and the Gendarmerie handled military logistics, on-the-scene advice and training—including training in chemical warfare,’ the former intelligence official said. ‘Stepping up Turkey’s role in spring 2013 was seen as the key to its problems there… Erdogan’s hope was to instigate an event that would force the US to cross the red line. But Obama didn’t respond in March and April.’”

Two sources described to Hersh a working dinner during Erdogan’s visit to Washington in May 2013 in which Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Adviser Thomas Donilon met Erdogan, foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu and MIT chief Hakan Fidan. Erdogan appealed for Obama to attack Syria, telling him “your red line has been crossed.” Obama then pointed at Fidan and said, “We know what you’re doing with the radicals in Syria.”

Hersh cites a “US intelligence consultant” who describes a classified briefing for Martin Dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs, and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, prepared before the August 21 gas attack. The briefing noted “the acute anxiety” in the Erdogan regime over the military setbacks for the Syrian rebels and warned that the Turkish leadership felt “the need to do something that would precipitate a US military response.”

In the period following the gas attack, Hersh’s former intelligence official source explained, communications intercepts and other data supported the suspicion that Turkey had organized the Ghouta attack. “We now know it was a covert action planned by Erdogan’s people to push Obama over the red line,’ the former intelligence official said. ‘They had to escalate to a gas attack in or near Damascus when the UN inspectors’—who arrived in Damascus on 18 August to investigate the earlier use of gas—‘were there. The deal was to do something spectacular. Our senior military officers have been told by the DIA and other intelligence assets that the sarin was supplied through Turkey—that it could only have gotten there with Turkish support. The Turks also provided the training in producing the sarin and handling it.’”

Only a week ago, evidence surfaced that supports the credibility of Hersh’s report. A video was posted on YouTube of a meeting of Turkish officials, including Fikan, in which the intelligence chief suggests that Turkish agents should mount an attack on a Muslim shrine inside Syria to provide a pretext for a Turkish invasion of the country.

Hersh’s account is his second long exposé in four months of the “false flag” gas attack in Damascus. Both articles were published in the British journal because no major US newspaper or magazine will any longer publish material from the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist.

Beginning with his reporting of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam for the New York Times, Hersh has specialized in developing sources in the US military and intelligence apparatus, frequently those with policy differences with the current administration in Washington. Hersh left the Times for Newsday, and then wrote for the New Yorker for many years.

Both the New Yorker and the Washington Post refused to publish his first report on the Ghouta gas attack, which charged that the sarin attack had been carried out by Syrian rebels in the al-Nusra Front, forcing Hersh to find a British publisher for his account. The US press was largely silent on that report, and it has so far blacked out the latest exposure.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

Wow, this is good stuff.

Hersh sounds like a hero ... but he's also a conduit for factions within the US government (via inside sources), so I don't know that this is a fully-fledged hero, or if it is just another establishment voice.  *Discovered he's 'blacklisted' by major US media, as they refuse to publish him.  So Hersh's probably cool. 

What Turkey is capable of is mind-blowing.

I don't mind the PKK giving it to them, now.

US media refusing to publish Hersh, and Hersh having to publish outside the country shows us just how controlled the media is in the land of the 'free'.

CIA strikes again.  That David Petraeus guy played a part, as well.

I'm not sure if that UK analyist has anything to do with David Kelly, who was killed, probably by UK intelligence (I'm guessing).

Daily Mail UK

Suicide riddle of weapons expert who worked with David Kelly: Scientist tells wife he is going for a walk, then takes his life in a field... just like his friend
A weapons expert who worked with Dr David Kelly at the Government’s secret chemical warfare laboratory has been found dead in an apparent suicide.

In circumstances strongly reminiscent of Dr Kelly’s own mysterious death nine years ago, the body of Dr Richard Holmes was discovered in a field four miles from the Porton Down defence establishment in Wiltshire. It is not yet known how he died.

Mr Holmes, 48, had gone missing two days earlier after telling his wife he was going out for a walk – just as Dr Kelly did before he was found dead at an Oxfordshire beauty spot in July 2003.

Police said there were no suspicious circumstances in the latest case but revealed that Dr Holmes  had ‘recently been under a great deal of stress’.

He resigned from Porton Down last month, although the centre yesterday refused to explain why.
Inevitably, the parallels between the two cases will arouse the suspicions of conspiracy theorists.

Despite Lord Hutton’s ruling eight years ago that Dr Kelly committed suicide, many people – among them a group of doctorsbelieve his inquiry was insufficient and have demanded a full inquest.

Some believe Dr Kelly, who kept an office at Porton Down right up until his death, was murdered. He was outed as being the source of a BBC report that Downing Street ‘sexed up’ evidence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war.

Although it is not clear if the two scientists were close, one source told The Mail on Sunday that they were friendly when they worked at Porton Down in the Nineties.

At the time, Dr Holmes ran a project organising the installation of chemical protection equipment in RAF Sentinel spy planes, while Dr Kelly was head of microbiology and frequently toured the former Soviet Union as a weapons inspector.

After the first Gulf War, Dr Holmes is also thought to have worked on the production of chemical protection suits for troops. In 1991 he was the joint author of a scientific paper about an RAF chemical and biological protection system.

Yesterday, a Porton Down spokesman confirmed Dr Holmes had quit his job but declined to comment further. ‘It is not our policy to speak openly about any individual who works for us,’ she said.

Before finding his body, Wiltshire Police made a public appeal for information but warned people not to approach Dr Holmes for their own safety because they believed he had been ‘looking at information on the internet regarding self-harm and the use of toxic substances’.  [Wiltshire Police spin-doctoring to shape public perceptions?  Hard to say what's going on here.  British scientists and intelligence officers seem to die frequently and suspiciously (think of the one found dead in the zipped up bag in a bath).  Whatever this is, it's occurred before the sarin attack in Ghouta.]

Friends of Dr Holmes say this disclosure irritated his family, who questioned why a scientist engaged in chemical warfare research would ‘need to Google toxic substances’.

Dr Holmes’s widow, Susan, is  a chemist who also works at  Porton Down as head of business administration.

One of the Government’s most sensitive and secretive military facilities, the site has long been the focus of controversy.

Three years ago hundreds of ex-servicemen who were used as chemical warfare guinea pigs there between 1939 and 1989 were given compensation and an apology from the Ministry of Defence.

They were tested with the nerve agent sarin, but some of those involved claimed they had been  told they were taking part in cold-remedy trials.

Many suffered serious illnesses after exposure to the gas, which was developed by the Nazis during the Second World War.

An inquest into Dr Holmes’s death was opened and adjourned by Wiltshire Coroner David Ridley last week. Coroner’s officer Paul Tranter said Dr Holmes’s family had grown concerned for his wellbeing after  he failed to return from a walk on April 11.

A search party involving police and members of the other emergency services began combing waste ground close to his home in the Bishopsdown area of Salisbury.

Police discovered his body half a mile away in a field used regularly by dog-walkers and joggers in the village of Laverstock.

Mr Tranter said the results of tests carried out to establish the cause of death would not be known for several weeks.

He added: ‘Police do not consider this death to be suspicious in any way, nor do they believe there was any third-party involvement.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133201/Dr-Richard-Holmes-Suicide-riddle-weapons-expert-worked-David-Kelly.html


Recapping

Sarin gas attack, Ghouta 
(suburb Damascus, Syria) - 21 Aug 2013
carried out by al-Nusra Front

al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' Western proxy opposition
as pretext for US attack on Syria
killed hundreds
compliant corporate US media points at Assad
New York Times is big-time US foreign policy shill
publishes report of CJ Chivers
purporting to show gas shells could only have been fired by Syrian Army (Assad's)

Porton Down
Defence lab in Wiltshire, UK
analysis sample sarin
{obtained by British Intel}
demonstrated gas used in Ghouta attack
did not match existing Syrian batches
case against Assad/Syria could not hold
Obama cancels well-planned attack
aiming to totally wipe out Syria govt military
[reported by Patrick Martin, WSWS, 7 April 2014]

Days later TWO YEARS EARLIER
22 April 2012 - Daily Mail UK
Dr Richard Holmes
head of microbiology
{who worked with murdered (2003) Dr David Kelly}
Porton Down
Defence lab in Wiltshire, UK
... just happens to 'commit suicide'
... just like Dr David Kelly happened to  *bullshit*

Dr David Kelly
revealed UK intelligence
report re illegal attack on Iraq 'sexed up'
Dr David Kelly Died:  2003

Dr Richard Holmes
head of microbiology
Dr Richard Holmes Died:  2012
Porton Down lab
no match Ghouta attack
with Syria / Assad govt
NOTE
21 Aug 2013 = Sarin attack, Ghouta, Syria
Dr Richard Homes died year prior
presumably no link to Sarin 
More on Dr David Kelly:

Ten Years Ago: The Death of Dr. David Kelly. Murdered on the Orders of Her Majesty’s Government?

By Dr. David Halpin and James Corbett
Global Research, July 19, 2013
GRTV 13 October 2011

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-years-ago-the-death-of-dr-david-kelly-murdered-on-the-orders-of-her-majestys-government/5343229


White House lied that sarin source was Syrian army / Assad
& US military leadership knew it
Both American & British intel knew
'rebels' (ie proxies) in Syria
were developing chemical weapons
Evidence Seymour Hersh (journalist) relies on
US Defence Intel - 5-page briefing proves this
DIA Dep. Dir, David Shed
states al-Nusra maintained sarin production cell
Turkey & Saudi-based chemical facilitators
--> US government denied existence of document

Not brought to public attention
Kept hushed by:
  • US govt
  • European allies
  • UN stooges
  • political apologists
  • media
  • pseudo-left groups

Obama had Pentagon draw attack plans re Syria
35 such plans rejected - not sufficiently destructive
monster strike planned - 2,000 pounds bombs
intended to completely destroy Assad military

US attack on Syria would have:
  • constituted another US war crime (like Iraq)
  • killed thousands
  • crippled Syria as functioning society
  • produced another Libya (civil war 4 years)

Hersh reports:
Turkish government or its Intelligence
(comment:  which is partner & co-conspirator of Turkish govt
as evidenced by leaked audio - Syria false flag plot)
INSTIGATED SARIN GAS ATTACK IN GHOUTA
This assertion is reinforced by British Porton Down lab finding
that Ghouta sample is NO match for Syria government
& UK & US know this

Infighting re Syria
linked to Benghazi, Libya
  • US Consulate & CIA Mission Attack
  • 4 dead Americans
  • incl. Ambassador to Libya
CIA was arranging shipments 
of Libya weapons stockpiles
from Benghazi to Syria proxies
2012 secret agreement b/w Obama & Turkey
funding for weapons from:
TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA, QATAR
CIA + MI6 running arms
from Gadaffi arsenals Libya
to Syria al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies attacking Syria govt
front companies set up
for cover, incl. Australian entities
retired US military
hired to manage procurement & shipping
op run by Gen David Petraeus, CIA Director
CIA reportedly pulled out post Benghazi
LIBYA to TURKEY to SYRIA weapons rat run continues
manpads / portable SAM launchers supplied to al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies
capable of air attacks
MIT tasked by Erdogan
to stage provocation, as pretext for US intervention
MIT runs liaison w/  al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies
gendarmerie (military that is policing civilian sector)
handled logistics, training etc on site
gendarmerie (ie Turk military) training incl. chemical warfare
leaked Turkish authorities + intel audio
supports suspicion Turkey arranged Ghouta attack
Sarin supplied via Turkey
w/ Turkish support + handling training

No major US newspaper or US magazine
will publish any material from Seymour Hersh any longer -- ie he must be blacklisted

New Yorker & Washington Post
refused to publish Seymour Hersh Ghouta gas attack first report
that indicated al-Nusra Front
(al-Qaeda linked, Turkish & Western backed 'rebel' proxy)
linked to Ghouta chemical attack



Original Seymour Hersh Article

The Red Line and the Rat Line
Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels
Vol. 36 No. 8 · 17 April 2014
pages 21-24 | 5870 words
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line


David Cameron's Shameless Attack on Russia
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/russia-west-gas-attack-syria

Is Dave aware that Hersh has exposed the lot of them?









August 13, 2015

Intelligence Services Hoax


The UK’s official secrets act, forgeries & facts Part 2
Posted By: Content EditorPosted date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015in: Commentary, OpinionNo Comments

By: Sher Khan

Seymour Hersh is a Chicago native, and a man who, some would say ‘taken very seriously’ by the White House since 1960’s, let alone the menials in the corridors of power.

Hersh’s 10,000-word article about the events surrounding Osama bin Laden’s killing on 1st May 2011 was published by the London Review of Books in May 2015. It has created a global stir amongst the powers that be, to put it mildly. Clearly, Hersh has touched a nerve that has triggered a tsunami of counter efforts by the US Government.

The summarized version of his article on the ‘staged’ killing of OBL is; “Almost everything that has been said or written about this massively documented event (9/11), including the White House’s version of the killing of OBL, isn’t true”!

Hersh was the courageous journalist, who first reported the U.S. military’s stockpiling of chemical and biological weapons used during the Vietnam War. His 1969 account of U.S. Army atrocities in the Vietnamese village of ‘Mai Lai’ was the show stopper for the Vietnam War.

He has the distinction of unearthing some of the most consequential US Government shenanigans of the past half-century. His investigative reporting exposed the Nixon administration’s efforts to destabilize Chilean President Salvador Allende in 1973. His 1973 article about the Watergate burglary defendants, who were paid hush money with funds from Nixon’s re-election campaign, eventually lead to Nixon’s resignation.

Hersh exposed the illegal spying by the CIA in 1974 along with the Israel’s clandestine nuclear weapons program. Hersh also exposed the gun-running and drug-smuggling by Panamanian dictator and CIA man, Manuel Noriega in 1986. Hersh exposed Gen. Barry McCaffrey’s alleged war crimes during the Persian Gulf War. He also exposed the 2004 abuse of Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghuraib prison.

Robert Mirald, a critic of Seymour Hersh, wrote a book about him in 2013 and wrote;
“He explodes onto page one, his critics say ‘it ain’t so’, and yet in the end he’s proven to be correct. Over time, Hersh’s accounts stand up”.
On June 19th, 2015 Press TV Reported:

Senior members of the Bush administration are being sued by an international team of lawyers, led by former attorney general Ramsey Clark, over the illegal war in Iraq.”
The lawsuit was filed on May 27 2015, on behalf of a widowed Iraqi mother, Sundus Saleh, against former US President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and the Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz.

According to the complaint filed in the US Court of Appeals, Bush administration officials “broke the law in conspiring and committing the crime of aggression against the people of Iraq.”

“The invasion resulted in the total destruction of a beautiful, peaceful country,” said Sundas Saleh. “The invasion didn’t destroy only the country’s infrastructure, buildings and heritage; it destroyed millions of families and their dreams.”

On 17 June 2015, a top US Federal Court ruled, that the people held for months on end for immigration violations following Sept. 11, 2001, can now sue top government officials for racial profiling and other abuses.

The split decision from a three-judge panel on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals came after more than a decade of litigation and is likely to lead to increased scrutiny of the US Government’s behavior following the 2001 terror attack.

Judges Rosemary Pooler and Richard Wesley, who gave the landmark verdict, wrote in their 109-page decision:-

“We simply cannot conclude at this stage that concern for the safety of our nation justified the violation of the constitutional rights on which this nation was built”.

It is evident to those, sitting in the corridors of power that, what has been researched and written by Seymour Hersh in May 2015, about the ‘staged’ killing of OBL has a lot of merit.

Gauging by his previous track record of meticulous research, the history would eventually prove his narrations right. This Magnus Opus of Sy’s work has shaken the United States Government and its allies to the core. If the facts would surface, as it seems that they will now, then the US Government and its allies shall be risking a lot more than just the US$ 6 Trillion that has already been spent by the US Tax payers since the October 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The razor sharp article by Seymour Hersh and the law suit filed by the former US Attorney General perhaps encouraged the landmark decision against Bush and Co. for their deeds post 9/11.

All these happenings make a strong case for the moral stand taken by Edward Snowdon in unraveling of the hidden dark facts behind the so-called ‘war on terror’ and the mass surveillance on a global scale by the NSA and GCHQ.

UK Government’s Communications Headquarters or simply GCHQ started its work in the earlier part of 1940’s if not before and had more staff working for it then MI6 and MI5 combined, according to a book titled, ‘GCHQ’, written in 2011 by Richard Aldrich.

Its deep cover work and activities have shaped and continue to shape international events since 1940’s, leading to regime changes favouring British interests around the world. Needless to say, the UK Government never really acknowledged GCHQ, as the structured shadow intelligence organization, operating above the remit of governmental oversight, until 1976-77.

British investigative journalist par excellence, Duncan Campbell became famous in the UK as the ‘C’ in the infamous ABC Official Secrets Act case of 1977-78. The case was initiated because of the first public exposure of the deeds of GCHQ acting above the law.

The UK government prosecuted two journalists and an ex soldier, for discussing the existence of GCHQ and its shadow workings globally. The ABC case (named after the three defendants, Aubrey, Berry and Campbell) ended in November, 1978, causing grave embarrassment for the UK government.

Thus, Duncan Campbell was the journalist who revealed the existence of the global British electronic intelligence agency GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters), in his 1976 article titled, ‘The Eavesdroppers’. His story led to the “ABC” trial in 1978, and the UK government’s failed attempt to jail him for up to 30 years under the Official Secrets Act laws.

Duncan Campbell exposed that the GCHQ, along with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) was operating a massive global electronic surveillance network from locations around Britain, without any parliamentary accountability or any public scrutiny.

Campbell’s co-author, Mark Hosenball was deported on the grounds of being a threat to the UK’s national security. After the story about the GCHQ, Campbell became a target for British intelligence, which started to illegally track his activities.

In 1980, Duncan Campbell published a series of articles about the British Intelligence overstepping their constitutional limits. The articles revealed the likely location of Britain’s communications tapping centers. Duncan Campbell also exposed the potential financial burden of the intelligence services on the British tax payers.

Campbell’s work for the BBC’s Panorama programme investigation the UK security services was blocked by the Downing Street according to the 2011, National Archives cache of Downing Street correspondence released on the issue. Several Private and Confidential Memos detailed the Prime Minister Lady Thatcher and her advisors attempting to block or ban the programme.

The memos also revealed the historic paranoia of the British Government about the impact of Campbell’s work, along with other investigative journalists like him, and their level of motivation to expose the hidden facts. His ground breaking research on GCHQ and the subsequent publishing of the stories about the British intelligence agencies caused grave concern at the highest levels of the British government.

In 1980 he exposed the role of the United States National Security Agency’s (NSA) Menwith Hill Station, Yorkshire and its role in illegal interception of worldwide communications with the complicit cooperation of the GCHQ.

Campbell was injured in a cycling accident in 1984 and it was revealed through secret memo’s that Special Branch officers were given his bicycle pannier and papers. At the precise moment his house was also raided on a search warrant.

In 1987, Campbell was invited by the BBC to write and present a six-part documentary series the Secret Society. Before running the programme, and reviewing its blunt and factual content, the BBC top management got nervous and approached the government for advice. The British Government’s reaction resulted in the raid at the BBC’s Scottish headquarters including Campbell’s home. The Special Branch seized the films that were recorded as, The Zircon Affair.

Zircon revealed the existence of a secret £500m British spy satellite programme of the same name. Campbell’s investigation detailed how the government policy was being decided by a group of unaccountable committees operating beyond the scrutiny of parliament and the public. Eventually, the Zircon films were returned, but the BBC chose not to release the episodes. The redacted and much altered version appeared on Channel 4 in 1991.

In 1988, Campbell revealed the existence of the GCHQ’s top secret ECHELON project. Due to Campbell’s work, finally in 1997, the ECHELON become controversial throughout the world.

In 1998, Campbell was asked by the European Parliament to report on the development of surveillance technology and the risk of abuse of economic information, especially in relation to the ECHELON system. His report, “Interception Capabilities 2000” was approved by the European Parliament in April 1999, and tabled at the EU Parliament in February 2000. In July 2000, the EU Parliament appointed a committee of 36 MEPs to further investigate the ECHELON system. The efforts to block ECHELON fell apart since 9/11 happened and the world got ‘exposed’ to a new ‘global terrorism’ threat.

In 1997 Campbell became one of the founding members of the Centre for Public Integrity in Washington D.C. The Center helped found the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). ICIJ is designed to be a cross border investigative outfit “focusing on issues that do not stop at national frontiers.”

In 2002, Campbell became part of an investigation into the role of private security firms and lobbyist groups in the wars being waged across the globe by the US and UK. The investigation titled, ‘Making a Killing: The Business of War’ exposed the increasing use of private security firms and mercenaries and the how the multi-billion dollar defense industry’s lobbying methods lack any accountability.

In 2006, the ICIJ started a project with a much wider scope. The investigation focused on how the global trade funds terrorism, organized crime and how the tax sheltering/loss of tax revenues hurt the developing economies from where the big business earn billions of dollars and avoids paying taxes by using shell companies.

Finally In 2013, ICIJ began publishing the results of its investigation linking tax havens to the global movement of money to avoid tax. The investigation called “Offshore Leaks,” is one of the largest journalism collaboration in the modern history.

The data from this collaboration forms the core of the material that has been published in series of stories by the Guardian, Sunday Times, and Sydney Morning Herald etc.

The citizens of the British Common Wealth, the Overseas Territories and in particular our direct reading audiences in the Cayman Islands are often dismissive of the sporadic evidence against the FCO with skepticism. The message and the writ of the British Governance through their UK appointed representatives in the OT’s such as Cayman is that; there can be no wrong on part of the Crown and its law enforcement entities, and anything said or brought against their abuse of power it is either malicious or ‘forged’.

The suppression of Operation Tempura report, the Aina Report, the recent review of the performance of the Office of the DPP and so many others in the past, by the successive Governors of the Cayman Islands, perfectly fit the pattern of ‘secrecy’ and suppression in the mother country, UK. The Crown appointed Auditor Generals are way too trigger happy to blast the locally elected members of the legislative assembly and their ‘mismanagement’ of the tax payers dollars, they would not dare raise their pen to ink any gross wastage of public money paid out for this fancy reports, by the very tax payers of the Cayman Islands, who have every right to read the findings of the reports that they fund. The Auditor General cannot also criticize the DPP or the Attorney General for prosecuting cases that fall flat on their face in the courts, resulting in wastage of public funds and at times paying huge settlement costs. The Auditor General can also not write or comment in the RCIP’s funding and spending nor can comment on the covert operations funding in the country. The spending by the Crown is simply off the charts.

The 2003 Iraq War’s Chilcot Inquiry, Lord Janners Child Abuse inquiry, Ex British PM Edward Heath’s child abuse inquiry and the UK Met Police sex abuse inquiry to name a few are all suppressed or not made public in the UK in the name of ‘public interest’.

The cherry on the top is the Scotts Report commissioned in 1992 to investigate the 1980’s large export of lethal weapons to Iraq including chemical and biological warfare equipment. The equipment was sold under the able guidance of the FCO. The inquiry never saw the light of the day. UK went to war with the very country it supplied weapons to, during the 1980’s. So much for facts Mr. Blair!

So here is the question, Do we really need to ‘forge’ any more evidence to prosecute those sitting in the corridors of power at the very top or are the rules of engagement different for the common man, who is at the receiving end of the law? It seems that those who enact and impose the laws are above it at all, every times, for as long as ‘we’ allow the sun to never set on the British Empire.


The first part of this commentary was published in Tuesday, 11 July’s edition of The Cayman Reporter. It is available online at www.caymanreporter.com

http://www.caymanreporter.com/2015/08/12/uks-official-secrets-act-forgeries-facts-part-2/
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

So much info in this article.

Lots of interesting things I didn't know about.

Need to do some more reading, I think.  Not up to it now.  Really tired & having trouble just taking this in.

Duncan Campbell was sort of like Assange Mark I.

I'm just about falling asleep, and all I have to say for the time being is:

same crap, different decade

Nothing ever changes.

Those in power were always corrupt and continue to be corrupt.

The corruption and the abuse of power never ends.

And it is a different law for them.

So intelligence agencies are:
  • violators of law
  • violators of civil liberties
  • violators of democratic process
  • servants of corporate interests
  • footsoldiers of the powerful and corrupt
  • Robin Hood in reverse:
  • take from the poor (public) to lavishly fund their own existence
  • take from poor (public) & give to rich, funding the manifestation of corporate agendas
  • start wars, on behalf of corporate interests, leaving the poor (public) to foot the corporate bill - for generations
  • liars who deceive public: claiming 'national interests' & 'security' etc ... and get the public to underwrite that, too.
It's an intelligence services and democracy is a hoax.

---------------------- ꕤ  ----------------------

 A good companion piece might be:

1954 Guatemalan coup d'état

HERE








[No time for labels.  Will pass out if I don't lie down - now.  lol]