TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Farnborough Air Show. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Farnborough Air Show. Show all posts

July 18, 2014

David Cameron's Speech - Farnborough Air Show

Speech
Prime Minister's speech opening Farnborough Air Show


From:
    Cabinet Office, Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street and The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
Delivered on:
    10 July 2012 (Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)
History:
    Published 10 July 2012

David Cameron considers the current state and the future of the UK aerospace industry.
The Rt Hon David Cameron MP

It gives me great pleasure to be here today to open the Farnborough Air Show and the first thing I want to say is a very big thank you. You are a vitally important industry for the United Kingdom and for the future of our country and our economy.

In a hugely difficult time in the global economy, when we’re tackling a massive budget deficit at home, UK aerospace is flying high:

    employing more than 100,000 people;
    turning over more than £20 billion a year; and
    winning contracts for more than a decade in advance.

Every two and a half seconds a plane powered by a Rolls Royce engine takes off. Our Hawk aircraft are used by 25 air-forces around the world. British firms are developing new technologies to send tourists into space and inventing telescopes that can see the oldest parts of the universe.

Across civil aviation, defence, security and space research, this is a real success story and I want to thank everyone here for helping make it happen. I also want to welcome guests who have come from overseas today and to say here how much we welcome firms like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, GE, Finmeccanica, Thales and Airbus who come and create good jobs here.

Those collaborations are crucial to the success of the UK industry. But my biggest message today is that there can be no complacency. Yes, we’ve got a 17 per cent share of the global market, but as everyone here knows, the rest of the world is breathing down our necks.

We’ve got to be constantly alive to this competition - constantly looking to get ahead - and that includes government just as much as industry. I don’t want anyone here to be in any doubt that this is a massive industrial priority for me, for this whole government.

Some might say ‘you’re talking like some 1970s-style central planner - aren’t you meant to be a free-market Conservative?’ Frankly, I am a do-what-works Conservative. I don’t believe in picking winners but I absolutely believe in backing them.

I’m not going to just sit back while China and India invest in more high-tech engineers; while countries across the world snap at Britain’s heels. We are determined to do everything we can to back UK aerospace and I hear three big things that you want from us:

Number one - you want stability and certainty about the future. We’ve heard this loud and clear. When it takes fifteen years from the start of a programme to getting that aircraft in the sky, fifteen years more to break even and fifteen years more to make a profit, you cannot have governments that think short-term.

But that has been the story. There was a great surge of investment in the 70s and 80s and since then it’s gone a bit stop-start, with government scraping around, getting some cash and saying ‘can you start a new programme tomorrow?’

You can’t do business like that - and we get that. That’s why we’ve launched the Aerospace Growth Partnership. This is about us working together, thinking really long-term about how to make the UK the best place to design, manufacture and export.

Crucially, it’s not someone in Whitehall working out how many bolts should be in the next AgustaWestland helicopter; it’s a long-term industrial partnership that is being led by you; bringing more predictability to how you’re funded, how you research and how you plot your moves into new markets.

And speaking of AgustaWestland, the new AW189 which is going to fly here at Farnborough for the first time is a really good example of how government can work with you. We announced a £32million support package last year, already it’s bearing fruit, and that bodes well both for the diversification into civil aircraft and a closer partnership between government and business.

The second thing we hear from you is about skills. You want more vision, more investment - and with this government you’re getting it. We’re delivering a quarter of a million extra apprenticeships, rolling out 25,000 new Higher apprenticeships in sectors like aviation and establishing 24 new University Technical Colleges in the next couple of years.

Our universities are the finest in the world and we’re building on that reputation; investing £4.6 billion a year in science and research. And today we announce something else: a partnership with industry to have 500 new Master’s level graduates in aerospace engineering over the next three years. We are only as good as the people we’ve got and the skills they have got - and this just shows we are determined to be the best.

Third, we hear you want more support on exports - particularly defence exports. Now I personally have loaded up plane after plane with executives so we can get signatures on British contracts - and however much flak I got for that, I will do it all over again.

But there’s more that we as a government should do. We recognise there is a clear relationship between what the Ministry of Defence buys and the export orders you secure, because those overseas buyers want products that are mature and battle-proven. Over the past two years we have come in and taken a defence budget that was falling apart at the seams and we’ve sorted it out.

This isn’t some exercise in accounting for its own sake - it’s allowed us to turn the unfunded wish-lists we inherited into real commitments: new Chinooks; new work on the Warrior programme; an upgrade to our reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering capabilities.

And because of the work we’ve done, we can say that not only are we still going to have the fourth-largest defence budget in the world - but it’s going to be sustainable. Now when it comes to future decisions, we’ve made clear the priority has got to be getting maximum defence capability for every pound that’s spent.

Our armed forces deserve nothing less. But I don’t see this as an ‘either/or’ situation - buying for value or buying British. There’s more we can do to join the dots; to think in a more careful way about how to back this industry while getting the best deal for the Ministry of Defence as a customer. [????]

To that end I can tell you that just as we have started up the Aerospace Growth Partnership for the civil sector, so we want to start a similar dialogue with the defence and security industry - building on the White Paper published this year - so we can help you grow and thrive and create new jobs.

And as just a taster of that new, more collaborative approach I can make another announcement today. Typhoon and Tornado, equipped with outstanding low-collateral, high-precision munitions, were the battle winners in Libya. As Prime Minister I can tell you that it means an enormous amount to know that we have highly capable crews on highly capable aircraft. You know they are going to do exactly the job you have asked them to do and the precision is absolutely brilliant.

Building on that success, we have agreed with our partners to exploit the growth potential of Typhoon; boosting its already world-beating capabilities with integration of new weapons including the METEOR missile, an Electronically Scanned Radar and enhanced ground attack capability.

That’s good for the RAF which needs these capabilities, good for our export customers who want these capabilities and it is very good for the British manufacturers and British workers who are going to benefit.

It is now for industry to come forward with innovative and affordable proposals so we can move ahead together. And this is what our approach is all about: reconciling what’s best for UK security and the UK economy - and above all, thinking long-term.

So this, in short, is what you’re going to get from us: an unstinting, unrelenting, unflagging commitment to making Britain the best place in the world for aerospace. Our driving vision is to build an economy that is built on hi-tech manufacturing, that is fuelled by exports, that is making and selling the products the world wants to buy.

I look forward to working with everyone here to achieve that and now it gives me real pleasure to announce that the Farnborough Air Show 2012 is officially open for business.
Share this page

Published:
    10 July 2012

From:
    Cabinet Office
    Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street
    The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
-----------------------------------------------------

COMMENT

  • 4th largest military spending in the world is massive spending.
  • So it's military/technology race with India & China?
  • What exactly did Cameron have to do to get executive signatures? 


Best part of speech was:

Frankly, I am a do-what-works Conservative

So I was right; he cannot be trusted because he'll do whatever is expedient.

July 16, 2014

New UK Foreign Secretary - Philip Hammond

 Global Post Article


Eurosceptic named new UK foreign minister as EU vote looms

British Prime Minister David Cameron named eurosceptic Philip Hammond as his new foreign secretary on Tuesday in a major cabinet reshuffle ahead of next year's general election.
Former defence secretary Hammond, who replaces William Hague, supports Britain leaving the European Union unless significant powers are returned to London before a referendum promised for 2017.

The prime minister has pledged to hold a referendum on Britain leaving the EU if he is re-elected.
...
It also saw the government turn more eurosceptic as Cameron seeks to face down the anti-EU UK Independence Party (UKIP), which many lawmakers fear could take seats from the Conservatives at the election.
"Belatedly, the prime minister has understood that his too-male, too-southern, too-posh cabinet is a serious political liability," wrote The Times.
...
In his first public comments as foreign secretary, Hammond vowed that his approach to the EU would be one of "enthusiastic engagement with the reform agenda".

"But our position is very clear," he told reporters at the Farnborough airshow south-west of London. "It won't be the politicians in smoke-filled rooms who decide whether the deal is the right one.

"It will be the British people in a referendum who decide whether the deal is the right one."
...
"But the fact that someone who has said that they'd vote to leave (the EU) if substantial powers were not returned to the UK in the renegotiation is now foreign secretary sends a clear message to the rest of the EU."

Hammond has been replaced as defence secretary by Michael Fallon, a veteran loyalist.
...
Hague will remain in parliament until the next election but his resignation as foreign secretary marks the end of the political career of a man Cameron called "one of the leading lights of the Conservative Party for a generation".

A former Tory leader, Hague was a leading voice urging the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad before the House of Commons last year voted against conducting missile strikes.

EXTRACTS - FULL Article - Global Post - here.
--------------------------------------------------------
HAMMOND

Accountant - [Source - Daily Mail - here]
Oxford educated
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • Economics
Connections
director of Speywood Medical Limited in 1981

  • Castlemead Ltd
  • Castlemead Homes
  • CMA Consultants

Business interests in:  house building; property; manufacturing; healthcare; oil & gas.

Consulted in Latin America for WORLD BANK in Washington DC.
Consultant for govt MALAWI 1995-1997.

*appointed to front bench -- as spokesman Health - by William Hague in 1998.

Minister of Defence 2011-2014.

Claim to fame:
Reckons banks are not responsible for the financial crisis:  "they had to lend to someone".
[WIKIPEDIA]

--------------------------------------------------------
Daily Mail Article
....
At first sight, his replacement by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond is bizarre, when Britain badly needs to build European alliances.

Hammond is an accountant who displays the warmth of an undertaker and less personality than most laptops. [LOL]

On reflection, however, we can see a logic in his appointment.

Hammond is no fool, and a paid-up Eurosceptic. When he tells European governments that if Britain does not secure a renegotiation of its EU membership he, for one, will vote to get out, they will need to believe him.

And if it all goes wrong and the Prime Minister finds it expedient to ditch Hammond downstream, there will be few mourners to make a fuss.

His replacement as Defence Secretary, Michael Fallon, seems a good choice. ...

Fallon inherits Armed Forces demoralised by Hammond, who seemed to care only for numbers rather than people. If Fallon, a bright and decent former Business Minister, can restore the confidence of our soldiers, sailors and airmen that they are not mere turkeys in Downing Street’s eyes, being fattened up for redundancy, he will earn his corn.

Of course, it is welcome that Cameron has promoted a string of women to ministerial roles. All that is now needed is that they should prove themselves worthy of them. [LOL]
EXACT ONLY
Source - Daily Mail - here.
 --------------------------------------------------------
 Daily Mail Article - Quentin Letts

...  richest member of the Cabinet — his fortune, mainly from property development, is sometimes put at £7million but is probably more — yet there is nothing showy about Mr Hammond.

He has a mournful visage, cadaverous limbs, the shoulders of a hungry heron — and the resilience, as yesterday’s reshuffle appointment showed, of a mollusc on a storm-tossed rock.  [LOL]

... young Philip won a scholarship to Oxford University from his state school.

,,, The voice has a faint John Majorish twang and like Major he is proud, particular, not to be underestimated.

He is discreet. Wary. Reliable. These qualities will earn him  trust in diplomatic circles but  the embassy dinner party circuit should not expect an injection  of garrulous wit.

The new European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker may not find sober Philip much of a boozing companion.
...
Some say that if the Prime Minister came to grief, a Hammond-Theresa May ticket — the Dull Duo! — may be in the offing.

But which would be the boss? Now he is Foreign Secretary, he is at least on level pegging with Home Secretary May.

Significantly, Mr Hammond  has also spoken, briefly, of his desire to leave the EU. For the man now in charge of our Foreign Office, this is a potentially explosive position, yet somehow nothing with P. Hammond ever explodes. Rhetorically, he is the king of ‘phutt’. [what? LOL]
Yet the Euro News agency yesterday described him as ‘l’eurosceptique Philip Hammond’. In recent years, though, Foreign Secretaries have invariably ‘gone native’. Even William ‘Save the Pound’ Hague lost his zeal there.

History suggests Mr Hammond will go the same way, but if he can bring the same determination to EU renegotiation as he did to defence cuts ... 


EXACT ONLY
Source - Daily Mail - here.

--------------------------------------------------------
Source:  The Sun - here.
 COMMENT

Sounds an interesting sort, Hammond.

DM doesn't sound too keen on Hammond.

UK MILITARY SPENDING TO INCLUDE - UK SPACE STATION

Spaceport UK: Government plan to launch spaceplanes

  • 13:53 14 July 2014 by Paul Marks, Farnborough
  • For similar stories, visit the Aviation and Space flight Topic Guides
Build it and they will come. That was the message from the UK Space Agency today as it revealed ambitious plans to build a spaceport somewhere in the UK before 2018. However, no commercial space company has yet demonstrated a spaceplane that is capable of carrying paying passengers.
The plan is to build a spaceport at a remote site where regular airline traffic is low. The location also has to have a longer-than usual runway or room to build one. This is because after a hypersonic re-entry, spaceplanes will still be travelling at far greater speeds than standard planes and will need more room to land.

Such requirements make either the north or north-east of Scotland a sensible location, away from the busy transatlantic air corridors. Cornwall in the UK's deep south-west is also a possibility, where likely sites may include RAF St Mawgan, near Newquay, which is already used for rocket engine testing. In all, eight sites have been shortlisted by the UK Space Agency and will be announced at Farnborough Air Show by the science minister David Willets tomorrow.
...
The decision to build a spaceport follows a two-year government review looking at the job-creating potential of commercial spaceflight. It concluded that a spaceport would be an essential hub for a host of space-related markets, from tourism to satellite launches, offering many employment opportunities.
In a brief statement released ahead of tomorrow's announcement of potential sites, the UK Space Agency says: "A spaceport would open up the UK space tourism industry to specialist operators such as Virgin Galactic and XCor, but it also paves the way for future technologies that will help make Britain the place for space."

Virgin Galactic and XCor are working on spaceplanes orbital vehicles that land like regular planes. Virgin's SpaceShipTwo is a "captive carry" design lofted to an altitude of 10 kilometres by a jet plane, from where it fires its rocket motor and heads for suborbit. Flight tests are ongoing. Xcor's Lynx is a rocket plane that flies from the runway to space with no carrier aircraft – but it has yet to fly.
Being able to service such spacecraft with a British spaceport is crucial, says the UK Space Agency. "It will be the first spaceport of its kind outside the United States."

Rocket science

Other companies in the industry are impressed. "It's great to see the UK establishing itself in the human spaceflight arena. Nations that ignore new opportunities developing in both suborbital and orbital space transportation run the risk of being left behind," says Mike Gold, head of operations at Bigelow Aerospace, a maker of expandable space habitats.

Moves in the US underscore the economic importance of spaceports: commercial rocket maker SpaceX of Hawthorne, California, has this week moved a step closer to getting permission to build its first all-commercial spaceport in Brownsville, Texas, on the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX already launches from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, plus similar facilities at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, but it needs more launch capacity to service its bulging backlog of rocket launch orders.

On 9 July, the US Federal Aviation Administration completed an extensive environmental audit of the impact of the proposed launch complex – and gave SpaceX the go-ahead for it. Such audits are not trivial: they are a serious, gruelling business ...

...

EXTRACTS ONLY 
SOURCE - New Scientist - here.

-------------------------------------------
COMMENTS 

UK Space Agency?  

Who even knew that existed?




 


July 15, 2014

GUARDIAN vs ITAR-TAS - UK vs RUSSIA

THE GUARDIAN

Russia withdraws delegates from Farnborough air show

Further diplomatic fallout from Ukraine crisis as Kremlin's head of defence pulls state officials following UK snub
Russian deputy prime minister Dmitry Rogozin has told his country's defence delegates to withdraw from the Farnborough International Air Show and return home after being snubbed by the British government over the Ukraine conflict.

The latest diplomatic incident came at the opening of the aerospace and defence industry's major sales fair in Hampshire and followed the UK government's efforts to actively discourage Russian attendance at the show. This year's show is marked by a visit from the British prime minister, David Cameron. [DISCOURAGED?]  [SANCTIONS] [NAAAH, DAVID CAMERON'S PLANNED SPEECH.]

"I recommend our delegation to wind up its participation in the show and return home," Rogozin, who heads Russia's defence sector, tweeted.

The UK government traditionally invites representatives from selected foreign governments to attend Farnborough as its guests, but this year said that "due to Russian actions in Ukraine, no representatives from the Russian government have been issued [UK government] invitations to Farnborough". [RUSSIA IS NOT IN THE UKRAINE - IT'S THE US THAT'S IN THERE.]

It added: "The government has also taken clear action to remove Russia from the list of countries eligible to use open general export licences, in order to discourage Russian attendance at [the show] … no foreign government representatives attending [Farnborough] as guests of [the UK government] will be escorted around the Russian pavilion by officials." [SANCTIONS]

The UK government action does not affect Russian businesses exhibiting at the show. This year a Russian state-owned arms firm, which supplied attack helicopters and grenade launchers to the Syrian regime, is exhibiting fighter jets.

...
SOURCE - The Guardian -  http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jul/14/russia-withdraws-delegates-farnborough-air-show-ukraine - here.

--------------------------------------------------------
ITAR-TASS

Still no explanations from London re visas for Russian delegation to air show

© ITAR-TASS/Marina Lisceva

Russian Foreign Ministry building in Moscow  
Moscow to respond reciprocally to UK refusal to issue visas to Russian officials

FARNBOROUGH, July 14. /ITAR-TASS/. Official London has so far not given any reply to the Russian Embassy’s inquiry regarding its refusal to issue British visas to a large number of Russian officials who planned to attend the Farnborough International Airshow, Russian Ambassador to Britain Alexander Yakovenko said on Monday, July 14.

“Britain on Saturday made a statement that the refusal to issue the visas was connected with the Ukrainian issue: 347 members of the Russian delegation requested visas, only 167 received them. We will be analysing all this now because it all happened very quickly. On Friday, when we realised that there were serious problems with ensuring the presence of the Russian delegation at Farnborough, we wrote a note and made an official inquiry,” Yakovenko said.

“The first thing we asked was to give us explanations why visas had been denied to the Russian participants. Second, we urged the British authorities to correct the situation in the remaining several days - Friday, Saturday and Sunday. We have not received any written reply to our inquiries so far,” he said.

Visa denied to Russian airshow delegation siitgn of “unhealthy competition” — official

“Let me tell you frankly: I cannot understand the logic (of London’s decisions). The British authorities say that the reason for not issuing the visas to certain individuals was the position (of Moscow) on Ukraine and the British are not cooperating with us at the official level. On the other hand, if we are to follow this logic, those who ensure safe operation of the exhibits are obviously not in this category but most of them were not given visas either,” the diplomat said.

“I think there is no logic there. But we will be discussing and analysing all these issues: who were denied the visas and why, and whether these were just delays or refusals. There were three major events this year and visas were not issued on time but several days after they had started or even ended” which resulted in “serious losses” for the Russian delegations, Yakovenko said.

“Farnborough is not only for British participants but also for representatives of a large number of other countries” with which the Russian delegation is making contacts during the show. “Naturally, the meetings that were planned will take place,” Yakovenko said but added that “a considerable part of Russian senior officials from our companies were not given visas” even though “mid-level officials received visas”. “All this has to be analysed and conclusions have to be made,” the diplomat said.

He took a tour of the Russian exhibition and said “our companies have no complaints against the organizers”.

“Let us not make guesses. We have not received any explanations yet. When we get them, we will see what Great Britain’s position is. We are not going to engage in guesswork for them. Russia’s position of principle is that we are ready to work with Britain as much as they are prepared to work with us. We will cooperate in the areas that remain open. If Britain closes some areas to sort of isolate itself from cooperation with Russia, this will also be a fact of life and we will take note of it,” Yakovenko said.

Moscow regards London’s refusal to issue visas to Russian participants in the Farnborough air show as “conspicuously unfriendly” and reserves the right to respond reciprocally, Foreign Ministry deputy spokesman Yuri Matery said.

In fact, although the documents were filed in advance, the main part of the Russian official delegation that was planning to take part in the Farnborough International Airshow-2014 which opened on July 14 will most likely be unable to come as they have not been issued British visas,” he said.

Matery recalled that a high-level delegation of officials from the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Federal Space Agency, the Federal Agency for Air Transportation, Russian Technologies, the Corporation Irkut, Rosoboronexport, MiG Corporation, Sukhoi Company and other interested companies was planning to travel to Britain to attend the exhibition and conduct talks with a large number of international participants.

“Technical personnel who attend to the exhibits, which have already been delivered for demonstration at the air show, were not issued British visas either. The Embassy of the Russian Federation in Great Britain has sent a note to the Foreign Office requesting explanations,” the spokesperson said.

This situation legitimately makes us feel indignant. We have always thought that as the organiser of major international events Great Britain would be interested in their success and in having as representative delegations at them as possible Yuri Matery Foreign Ministry deputy spokesman “This situation legitimately makes us feel indignant. We have always thought that as the organiser of major international events Great Britain would be interested in their success and in having as representative delegations at them as possible,” he said.

“This is not the first incident with visas for members of the Russian official delegation to the Farnborough air show. Similar incidents also happened at other international forums in Britain, including a natural food show in April of this year and Info Security Europe 2014 this summer,” the diplomat said. [RECURRENT]

“We consider such actions on the part of the British authorities conspicuously unfriendly and expect their official explanations with regard to the situation that does not fit into notion of normal interstate relations,” Matery said. “We reserve the right to respond reciprocally, as is customary in diplomatic practice,” he added.

The Farnborough International Airshow, which will work until July 20, is one of the major air shows in the world. Leading aircraft and spacecraft manufacturers present their latest achievements and make deals there. Last year, about 72 billion U.S. dollars’ worth of contracts and agreements were signed at the show.

SOURCE - ITAR-TAS: WORLD - here.

--------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT

The Guardian says one thing; ITAR-TASS says another.

ITAR-TAS said out of 347 delegates only 167 received Visas.

ITAR-TAS says Russian Embassador to UK is STILL waiting on an explanation.

Seems like The Guardian knows more than Russia's ambassador to UK.
Much is made of a tweet from Dmitry Rogozin:

I suggest that our delegation halts participation in the Expo and goes back home... [LINK TO ITAR-TASS] (cont) tl.gd/n_1s2fook
No idea what to make of that, aside from he's had enough of being jerked around waiting to hear from London.  Remember, it's been a few days.
What I do notice is that the UK show is now by 'special invitation'.  LOL.

Oh, and the Russians were 'discouraged' from attending.  

Why would you discourage representatives from country of equal standing from attending a trade fair?

So now it's closed shop?  But UK presumably expects cooperation etc from the Russians.

How do you insult a country and then expect to have any kind of decent relations with them?

followed the UK government's efforts to actively discourage Russian attendance at the show. This year's show is marked by a visit from the British prime minister, David Cameron.
Note the bit about David Cameron attending?  Well, we know what that's all about.

So if they've been discouraging Russia from attending (as per above quote from The Guardian), does that mean that they knew well in advance that this was David Cameron's triumphant moment -- and they didn't want it marred by the 'enemy' in the camp?  LOL

As if you could make an announcement about raising war funds while your targets are your guests.  

this year said that "due to Russian actions in Ukraine, no representatives from the Russian government have been issued [UK government] invitations to Farnborough".
So now the Russian's are gate-crashing? 
Russia has had zero actions in the Ukraine.  It's the US that's active in the Ukraine.
So all of this is really warped.
UK has its big military announcement to make and it would be inconvenient for the Russians to BE there; end of.