Cool Finds | Superstition

COOL FINDS 1825 - China ON THE ROAD TO THE MING TOMBS One of the great animal figures hewn out of a single block of marble - the guide standing beside it is almost six feet tall. Each emperor of the Ming dynasty, which ruled China from the fourteenth to the seventeenth century, was given an elaborate shrine, approached through an avenue of these marble animals.   [here]  The Jicarilla Apache formerly of New Mexico 1906 2004 Laura Gilchrist A Perfect Storm of Turbulent Gases 1995 First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton It looks like Hillary Clinton has had a nose job since 1995.     the original broad base, fleshy nose, wide nostrils right nasal bone looks more refined, as do nostrils | nose on the left bumpy, fleshier Apart from the enormous lips (on the right) these two could be sisters ... LOL Britain's William Hague & Hollywood-Military-Industrial-UN-Complex Propaganda Figure:  Angelina Jolie MI5 - 1944 'Pam' Description: MI5 staff member pictured on beach. This ordinary looking snapshot was taken and planted as part of a complex WWII intelligence plan known as Operation Mincemeat. The intention was that this photograph would make other documents secreted with it seem more authentic. These documents, passed on to German agents after they were found on a body washed up on the coast of Spain (planted by British intelligence) suggested that the Allies were not planning an invasion of southern Europe via Sicily. This led to a weakening of German defence of Sicily which assisted the eventual Allied attack.  [source] AUDIO | #1.0

#Hillary2016: Stand By for More Dirt on US Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton (Democrats)

WikiLeaks ARTICLE SOURCE:  Salon Friday, Jun 24, 2016 06:15 AM AEST Despite 4 years trapped in embassy, Assange says WikiLeaks has “very big year” ahead At NYC event, Assange said WikiLeaks has big new leaks, and warned a Hillary Clinton presidency "means endless war" Ben Norton June 19, 2016 marked the fourth year that Julian Assange, the editor-in-chief of whistleblowing journalism organization WikiLeaks, has been trapped in the Ecuadoran embassy in London. Several events were organized this week in cities throughout Europe, Latin America and the U.S. to commemorate this anniversary, and to bring attention to the escalating war on whistleblowers and journalists. Assange spoke via videostream at an event in New York City on Wednesday (video below). He stressed in his message that he has been effectively detained by the U.K. for five and a half years, even though he has never been charged with a crime. In February, the U.N. ruled that Assange is being arbitrarily and illegally detained, and is due compensation for the “different forms of deprivation of liberty.” Despite the hardship, nevertheless, Assange was excited about the months ahead. “It’s going to be a very big year for WikiLeaks,” he said. Assange implored the audience to “get ready to gather around” in order “to protect our ability to be publishing.” “It will be very necessary in the coming months,” the WikiLeaks editor stressed. Many of the upcoming releases, he said, concern Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. “I’ve come to know Hillary quite well,” Assange joked. WikiLeaks has released thousands of Clinton’s emails, and he has read many of them. “She is an extremely ambitious liberal interventionist hawk,” he explained. This is, of course, no surprise, he added, but the extreme degree of her belligerence is often not understood. Clinton “was the leading figure behind the destruction of Libya,” he said, echoing comments he said in an interview with Salon in February. “If Hillary Clinton gets into office, it means endless war,” Assange warned. “We are in fact already, under Obama, in endless war, but I think it will significantly ramp up under Hillary Clinton.” And “with a Democratic president in office, there is no strong Democratic opposition” to these policies, he noted. Assange added that, at the end of the day, the differences between Clinton and her opponent, presidential candidate Donald Trump, will not have a big impact on the U.S. empire. “I’m not sure it makes much difference which president” is in office, he said. Rather, the roughly 3,000 people appointed by the president are those who control how the U.S. empire operates. And the people whom Clinton chooses to surround herself with are hawkish liberal interventionists themselves. Of those who work under her, Assange said, Clinton demands “total sucking up” and constant flattery. She “surrounds herself with people who don’t really challenge her.” It’s “a liberal interventionist who surrounds herself with liberal interventionists,” he described it, citing figures like Anne-Marie Slaughter, another so-called humanitarian interventionist. The New York Times, which endorsed Clinton for president, pointed out that she is even more hawkish than her Republican rivals. The U.S. newspaper of record described her as “the last true hawk left in the race.” A digital Library of Alexandria Assange was joined at the event by a panel of renowned journalists and activists, including Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore, Democracy Now founder Amy Goodman, The Intercept co-founder Jeremy Scahill and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges, among others. Amy Goodman, who moderated the discussion, said it is amazing that, despite the sanctions, assassination threats and effective imprisonment Assange has endured for years, WikiLeaks remains strong. “How have you kept WikiLeaks going?” she asked. “I don’t know,” Assange joked in reply. He said it has only been possible thanks to the help he has gotten from the WikiLeaks staff and from people throughout the world. Assange added that he has had many “false friends,” who have betrayed him or were cowardly and timid in time of need. But he also thanked those who have supported WikiLeaks’ work. Besides, if he weren’t doing it, someone would take his place and continue the work, Assange argued. Goodman followed up, asking him what he is proudest of. Assange said it is simply keeping Wikileaks alive. “We have built a grand project, in some ways a grand dream,” he said, likening it to a contemporary digital Library of Alexandria. WikiLeaks has actually now published more documents while Assange has been detained than it did before. “And we have not fired a single person,” he added. Assange also spoke highly of The Intercept, the publication co-founded by Jeremy Scahill and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald, who worked with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. “It’s use it or lose it,” Assange told Scahill, expressing support The Intercept’s work. The media Assange had pretty harsh words for the rest of the media. He noted that the Pentagon has 20,000 people involved in public relations. The defense department writes thousands of propaganda stories each year “that they give away for free to the press.” Meanwhile, WikiLeaks’ documents have largely been ignored by the English-language press, although they are much more frequently cited in the international media, Assange said. “We’re happy to accept the ‘bad boy’ label,” he joked. “We are completely beyond the pale as far as a lot of the mainstream” press goes, Assange continued. But “we perceive those outlets to be beyond the pale” too. “They destroy history; they contain it in themselves; they privatize it.” “History does not belong to journalists; history does not belong to a media organization,” he argued. Assange added, “history does also not belong to whistleblowers,” even though they can be “the most important part” in helping to create it. “History belongs to human civilization to understand in order to better itself,” he stressed. The U.S. government The WikiLeaks editor vociferously challenged the U.S. government’s claim that his organization’s work has harmed national security. “It’s all rubbish; it’s just all garbage,” Assange said. “The information that we have published has never led” to anyone facing violence. The government has tried “desperately” to find a single case of a U.S. official being harmed, he noted, but has come up with nothing. In a lighter moment, Assange also noted that, while he has major problems with the U.S. government, the U.S. “does have some good things going for it.” He said he quite likes U.S. culture, and applauded the country’s enormous diversity. “London is a city-state” on the other hand, he lamented; it’s an “inbred system.” When asked about the June 23 vote on Brexit, the referendum on whether the U.K. should leave the E.U., Assange said it might not be so bad to do so. He noted the E.U. frequently acts “in service of transnational capital.” He read from a 2008 cable released by Wikileaks in which William Hague, then shadow foreign secretary for the Conservative Party and later first secretary of state and foreign secretary, stressed that any prime minister inevitably “learns of the essential nature of the relationship with America.” “We want a pro-American regime. We need it. The world needs it,” Hague said. Assange also criticized Sweden, noting that, while it is sometimes applauded for its social democratic government, it is one of the world’s largest per capita exporter of arms, and the only country that does rendition on its own people.   Aaron Schwartz Someone in the audience asked about electronic activist Aaron Schwartz. Assange said he had empathized a lot with Schwartz, and understood the pain he went through. The government’s harsh crackdown on Schwartz, after he made millions of documents and scholarly articles freely available on the internet, ultimately led to his suicide. “Aaron Schwartz was largely the victim of the crackdown against WikiLeaks,” Assange said. Assange recalled being afraid of speaking with Schwartz during the government’s investigation, because “there was such intense focus on me,” and he didn’t want to bring it to Schwartz. Assange said he regrets that now. Civil rights activists have spoken of how the effect of COINTELPRO, grand juries and FBI investigations was to “atomize people,” Assange noted. “There can be terrible side effects of that.” “An unusual power” Assange remains optimistic, however. He even managed to find a silver lining in his unfortunate situation. “There are some consolations to being an accused person and detained unlawfully,” Assange said. People who are accused develop “an unusual power” — and, he added, “there is no more severe accusation than being accused by a superpower.” ARTICLE SOURCE:  Salon http://archive.is/5o7Xq [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE] http://falkvinge.net/2013/01/04/two-swedes-renditioned-to-the-us-possibly-to-death-penalty-in-secrecy-and-without-lawyers-knowledge/ Two Swedes Renditioned To The US, Possibly To Death Penalty, In Secrecy And Without Lawyers’ Knowledge Process of Law – Henrik Alexandersson Mid-November, two Swedish citizens with Somali origins were renditioned from Djibouti to a prison in the United States of America. According to the US, they are hardened terrorists. According to other people, they tried to leave the terrorist-branded organization al-Shabaab. What’s true there is unclear. But that’s not the point that makes us interested in the story. An representative of United States Intelligence Services is reported to have told the two Swedes that “We’re waiting for permission from Swedish authorities to take you to the United States”. This is something that the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs first didn’t want to be associated with, and later declines any and all forms of comment. Here, we have a natural and special interest, as the two men are Swedish citizens. Are they suspected of committing an act which carries criminal penalties in Sweden – and if so, should they not be indicted and prosecuted in Sweden? Or has the Swedish government given the USA a carte blanche to “take care of” two Swedish citizens in the name of the war on terror – and if so, on what grounds? (Further, the suspicions concern acts committed in Somalia, where the US doesn’t have jurisdiction.) Suspicions of terror or not – the process of law must be respected, and international law followed. The government has no right to throw people into dark dungeons without a proper trial. We have a right to demand some form of damn order here. This affair has a distinct image of not having respected due process. This image is further strengthened by the fact that the two Swedes’ lawyers and relatives were kept in the dark for several weeks about what had already happened. If Sweden has agreed to rendition two people – Swedish citizens or not – to the United States of America within the context of what’s known as extraordinary renditions, this affair goes far beyond the questions about the formal due process. In such a case, it’s necessary to ask how much the Swedish governments’ promises are worth, when they promise to not extradite people to countries where they risk torture or death. This is a question that’s current and relevant in other cases, for example, regarding the Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. This affair smells really bad… Read More: Washington Post [in English], Svenska Dagbladet [in Swedish]. UPDATE: The lawyer of the two Swedes was informed of the rendition on December 7, about three weeks after the fact. When the lawyer was informed, and only then, were relatives informed. This has eerie similarities with banana-republic “disappearances”. This article was originally published in Swedish on Hax’ blog. Translated into English by Rick Falkvinge. http://falkvinge.net/2013/01/04/two-swedes-renditioned-to-the-us-possibly-to-death-penalty-in-secrecy-and-without-lawyers-knowledge/ C  O  M  M  E  N  T Sweden isn't all 'feminist foreign policy', Abba, IKEA ... or otherwise all that it would seem.

Slaphead William Hague & UN Puppet Angelina Jolie Starring in Anglo-American Capitalist Empire PsyOp

GENOCIDAL RAPE-PROMOTING ANGLO-AMERICAN Capitalist Empire Propaganda & Indoctrination Farce Infiltrates Academia: 'Gender' & 'Human Rights' Studies  Political Exploitation  PsyOp Delivered By Icons of Anglo-American PROPAGANDA, INDOCTRINATION, EXPLOITATION, GLOBAL DESTRUCTION & SOUND BITES Under Tutelage of Emaciated Hollywood Starlet 'Professor' Starring in: PsyOp 'Masters Course' MEANWHILE CAPITALIST EMPIRE'S DOMESTIC RECORD OF RAPE & DESTRUCTION While Preaching Global 'Human Rights' & 'Saving' the World's Women  SPEAKS FOR ITSELF ⚖ Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 SHUN CAPITALIST-SERVING IDEOLOGY Facilitating: INVASION, DISPOSSESSION, RAPE & GENOCIDE OF EUROPEANS Angelina Jolie-Pitt appointed visiting professor at London School of Economics to teach Masters course Press Association 23 May 2016 • 9:23pm The Hollywood star Angelina Jolie has been appointed visiting professor at the London School of Economics (LSE), where she will teach a Masters in gender and human rights. The Oscar-winning actress will join former foreign secretary William Hague as a lecturer at the university's Centre for Women, Peace and Security where she will help to teach students studying for a Master's degree. Jolie Pitt, who has been a goodwill ambassador for the UN Refugee Agency and is currently one of its special envoys, has been a vocal campaigner on refugee rights, and against the female genital mutilation and the use of rape as a weapon of war.  [comment:  never mind rape of European women and children, as collateral damage of the invasion policy that is European genocide in motion.] She said: "I am very encouraged by the creation of this master's programme. I hope other academic institutions will follow this example, as it is vital that we broaden the discussion on how to advance women's rights and end impunity for crimes that disproportionately affect women, such as sexual violence in conflict.  [comment:  Academic institutions divest themselves of legitimacy hosting POLITICALLY MOTIVATED psyop programs in service of capitalist agenda pushing propaganda and indoctrination campaigns, aimed at marshalling support for PRETEXTS for Anglo-American capitalist foreign interventions, which are far from benign. ] "I am looking forward to teaching and to learning from the students as well as to sharing my own experiences of working alongside governments and the United Nations". Lord Hague, who worked with Jolie-Pitt on hosting a four-day summit on ending sexual violence in war in London two years ago, said he was "delighted" to be appointed.  [COMMENT:  MEANWHILE BRITISH & EUROPEAN WOMEN & CHILDREN ARE BEING RAPED WHOLESALE ON ACCOUNT OF CAPITALIST AGENDA GENOCIDAL POLICIES IMPLEMENTED BY LYING, EXPLOITING & HYPOCRITICAL ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIAN DOGS. ] He said: "This course will help underpin our work in preventing sexual violence in conflict, developing expertise and research to assist us in tackling the culture of impunity. I look forward to working with the LSE students and my fellow visiting professors."   [COMMENT:  This is clearly an exercise in public influence and manufacturing of consent. These propagandist may as well hold back the oceans by means of paper cup.   Stop the rapes of Swedish women & children your masters have facilitated in Sweden & stop the horrific torture-murders of Afrikaners, you propagandist assh*les.    And what of the long and perverse history of Anglo-American culture of impunity on global scale, that is now DESTROYING EUROPE as ancestral homeland of the European people, you propagandist third-world women exploiting c*nts? ] The one year course will include modules on Women, Peace and Security, Gender and Militarisation and Gender and Human Rights. [comment:   More like EXPLOITATION of WOMEN campaign devised by CIA / NATO.   EXPLOITATION of the special 'gender' category of 'victim' / 'hero' intervention & PR tool angle.   EXPLOITATION of suicidal to pursue intellectual constructs of idealised 'universal' 'human rights' and so on, in context of Anglo-American intervention & EXPLOITATION of indoctrinated useful idiots as domestic lobbyists and shock-troops, forcing rape & genocide on Europeans.  ] ' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/23/angelina-jolie-pitt-appointed-visitingprofessor-at-london-school/ http://archive.is/6qH76

Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo: Global Pax Americana Post-Modern Colonialism / UN Security Council Breaks International Law

Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo: Global Pax Americana Post-Modern Colonialism / UN Security Council Breaks International Law (UN Resolution:  1244) Assoc. Professor Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic, Mykolas Romeris University, Institute of Political Sciences, vladislav@sotirovic.eu www.sotirovic.eu http://www.globalresearch.ca/ethnic-cleansing-in-kosovo-and-the-rights-of-the-serbian-minority-ten-years-after-the-march-pogrom-2004/5416867 Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo and the Rights of the Serbian Minority: Ten Years After The “March Pogrom 2004″ By Vladislav B. Sotirović Global Research, November 29, 2014 This article deals with the question of political and human/minority rights in the region of Kosovo & Metohija ten years after the "March Pogrom 2004“ and fifteen years after the NATO’s military aggression on Serbia and Montenegro and occupation of the region. An importance of this research topic is in a fact that for the first time in the European history a terrorist-style and mafia-ruled (quasi)independent state was created by a full diplomatic, political, economic, military and financial sponsorship by the West under the umbrella of the NATO’s and the EU’s protective administration. The precedence of Kosovo’s self-proclaimed independence in February 2008 already had several negative 'domino effect' consequences elsewhere in Europe (the Caucasus, the Crimean Peninsula…). The aim of the paper is to present a current situation in Kosovo & Metohija and possible consequences of the Kosovo case for the international relations and the post-Cold War world’s order. Global Pax Americana and post-modern colonialism It passed ten years after the "March Pogrom 2004“ in Kosovo & Metohija against the local Serbs organized and done by Kosovo Albanians, led by the veterans from the Kosovo Liberation Army – the KLA and logistically suported by the NATO’s occupation troops in Kosovo & Metohija under the name of the Kosovo Forces – the KFOR. That was simply a continuation of the last stage (up to now) of dismemberment of ex-Yugoslavia – the Kosovo War (1998-1999) and the NATO’s military intervention (March 24th–June 10th, 1999) against and aggression on Serbia and Montenegro (at that time composing the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia – the FRY) by violating the international law.[1] In this context, we can say that at the end of the 20th century the fate of ex-Yugoslavia was being determined by several international organizations, but not decisively by the Yugoslavs themselves.[2] The NATO’s military intervention against the FRY in March-June of 1999 (led by the USA) for the formal reason of protection of the human (Albanian) rights in Kosovo,[3] marked a crucial step toward finishing the process of creation of the global "Pax Americana“ in the form of the NATO’s World Order – the NWO.[4] As the NATO used force against the FRY without the UN Security Council sanctions and permission and also without an official proclamation of the war, we can call this military intervention in fact as a pure "agression“ against one sovereign state.[5] In the Balkans NATO acquired not only a big military experience and an opportunity to exhaust old and use new weapons,[6] but also managed to enhance its activities, making its way to a global organization. After the Kosovo War the UN’s Security Council Resolution 1244 (from June 1999) gave the mandate for the effective protection of the universal human and minority rights values of all inhabitants on the territory of the southern Serbia’s Autonomous Region of Kosovo & Metohija (in English language known only as Kosovo).[7] At such a way, the responsibility for protection of human lives, freedom and security in Kosovo was thus transferred to the “international” public authorities, but in fact only to the NATO: the administration of the United Nations’ Mission in Kosovo – the UNMIK, and the “international” military forces – (the KFOR, Kosovo Forces). Unfortunately, very soon this responsibility was totally challenged as around 200,000 ethnic Serbs and members of other non-Albanian communities were expelled from the region by the local ethnic Albanians led by the KLA’s veterans. At any case, mostly suffered the ethnic Serbs. It left today only up to 3% of the non-Albanians in Kosovo in comparison to the pre-war situation out of a total number of the non-Albanians in this province that was at least 12%. Only up to March 2004 around 120 Serb Orthodox Christian religious objects and cultural monuments were devastated or destroyed.[8] However, the most terrible in the series of Kosovo Albanian eruptions of violence against the Serbs living in this region was organized and carried out between March 17th-19th, 2004, having all the features of the Nazi-style organized pogroms. During the tragic events of the “March Pogrom 2004”, in a destructive assault of tens of thousands by Kosovo Albanians led by armed groups of redressed the KLA’s veterans (the Kosovo Protection Corpus – the KPC, a future Kosovo Albanian regular army), a systematic ethnic cleansing of the remaining Serbs was carried out, together with destruction of houses, other property, cultural monuments and Serbian Orthodox Christian religious sites. Nevertheless, the international civil and military forces in the region have been only “stunned” and “surprised” what was going on. The “March Pogrom 2004”, which resulted, according to the documentary sources, in the loss of several tens of lives, several hundreds of wounded (including and the members of the KFOR as well), more than 4.000 exiled ethnic Serbs, more than 800 Serbian houses set on fire and 35 destroyed or severely damaged Serbian Orthodox Christian churches and cultural monuments,[9] surely revealed the real situation on the ground in Kosovo even 60 years after the Holocaust during the WWII. Unfortunately, the attempts of the Serbs and especially by the government of Serbia at that time led by Dr. Vojislav Koštunica (a leader of the Democratic Party of Serbia) to call an international attention to the human and minority rights violation situation in this region proved to have been both unsuccessful and justified. It is thus necessary to reiterate that ethnic cleansing of the Serbs (and other non-Albanian population) in the region of Kosovo by the local Albanians after the mid-June 1999 means putting into practice the annihilation of a Serbian territory of exquisite historic, spiritual, political and cultural top-level significance in terms of the Serbian nation, state and the Church, and its every-day visible transformation into another Albanian state in the Balkans with a real wish and possibility to unify it with a neighboring motherland Albania. At such a way, the main geopolitical goal of the First Albanian Prizren League from June 1878 is being brought to its attainment, including its implications for the Preševo Valley in South-East Serbia, Western Macedonia up to the River of Vardar, a Greek portion of the Epirus province and the Eastern Montenegro. It is known that the Albanian political workers required within a framework of the First Albanian Prizren League (1878-1881) a creation of a Greater Albania as an autonomous province in the Ottoman Empire composed by “all Albanian ethnic territories”. More precisely, it was required that four Ottoman provinces (vilayets) of Scodra, Ioannina, Bitola and Kosovo would be combined into a single Albanian national Ottoman province of Vilayet of Albania. However, in two out of four required “Albanian” provinces – Bitola and Kosovo, the ethnic Albanians did not compose even a single majority at that time.[10] Nevertheless, such a Greater Albania with a capital in Tirana existed during the WWII under Mussolini’s and Hitler’s protectorate. The Albanian national movement, established in accordance with the program of the First Albanian Prizren League in 1878, is keeping on with its terrorist activities up today. It was particularly active in the period of Italian and German supported Greater Albania from April 1941 to May 1945, when it undertook the organization of the Albanian Quisling network of agents. During this period of time around 100,000 Serbs from Kosovo & Metohija have been expelled from their homes to addition of around 200,000 expelled during Socialist Yugoslavia from 1945 to 1980 lead by Josip Broz Tito who was of Slovene and Croat ethnic origin born in Croatia and notorious anti-Serb.[11] The process of articulation of the Albanian secessionist movement in Kosovo & Metohija continued during the post-WWII Yugoslavia and was carried out by Kosovo Albanian anti-Serb communist partocracy. The process became particularly intense and successful in the period between 1968-1989. For instance, only from 1981 to 1987 there were 22,307 Serbs and Montenegrins who were forced to leave Kosovo & Metohija.[12] The entrance of the NATO’s troops in the region in June 1999 marks the beginning of the last stage of the Albanian-planned and carried out the “Final Solution” of the Serbian Question on the territory of Kosovo & Metohija – a historical and cultural cradle of the Serbian nation, but in which only the ethnic Albanians ... [are?] to live in the future. In the light of the main Albanian goal – to establish ethnically pure Greater Albania – it is “understandable” why it is so important to destroy any Serbian trace on the territory defined by the aspirations. The Albanian terrorism has been developing for more than two centuries. It has the profile of ethnically, i.e. the Nazi-racist style motivated terrorism (like the Croat one), marked by excessive animosity against the Serbs.[13] Its principal features are the following: All kinds of repressive measures directed against the Serbian population. Carrying practical actions to force the Serbs to leave their homes. Devastation of the Serbian Orthodox Christian religious objects and other cultural monuments belonging to the Serbian nation which are clearly testifying ten centuries long presence of the Serbs in Kosovo & Metohija. Destruction of the complete infrastructure used by the members of the Serbian community. Destruction of the Serbian cemeteries what means de facto destruction of the historical roots of the Serbs in the region. A long standing Muslim Albanian oppression and terror against the Christian Orthodox Serbian community in Kosovo & Metohija is a specific phenomenon with the grave consequences not only for the local Serbs. It became, however, clear that sooner or later it will bring about severe problems for the rest of Europe as well. Ten years have passed from the "March Pogrom 2004“ and fifteen years  since the NATO’s military aggression against a sovereign European state of the FRY. At the moment, the crucial questions are: 1) What goals did NATO pursue? 2) Whether it managed to cope with its tasks in the following (15) years? 3) What did these years bring to those who threw bombs and those who were attacked? It has to be made clear that during the Kosovo War the NATO did not achieve a military victory as it failed to destroy the army of the FRY and the soldiers’ morale. However, a campaign of bombing got the right political atmosphere for destroying Serbia (purposely not so much Montenegro) and for imposing their conditions on the Serbian government, including the rules of the cooperation with the EU, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (in the Hague) and with the NATO as well. After June 1999 Serbia lost almost all opportunities to control its own state’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and national security becoming in a pure sense of meaning a western political and economic colony. After several years of injustice and punishment by the West before 1999 the Serbs as a nation lost the will to fight, to resist as they were practically alone when tried to repel the attack of the powerful western military alliance in March-June 1999. As a consequence, after June 1999 it became much easier for the West to continue a process of destruction of Yugoslavia and to carry out a policy of transforming the region into its own colonial domain with occupied Kosovo & Metohija as the best example of "die rückkehr des kolonialismus“.[14]  [Germ. / Eng:  ie.  "the return of colonialism"] In October 2000 Slobodan Milosević, who was a head of Serbia for ten years, was ousted by the street revolution putsch-style like it was done with Ukrainian president Viktor Janukovich in Kiev in February 2004.[15] At first sight, the move came as unexpected, easy and legal, in the other words – Yugoslavia’s home affair. However, the "Revolution of the Fifth October 2000“ in Belgrade, in fact, had been very thoroughly prepared by special divisions ("Otpor“ or "Resistance“) sponsored by the West, especially by the CIA. The method proved to be so successful that, according to one western documentary movie based on the testimonies by the members of the Serbian “Otpor“ movement, it was later used in Georgia (the "Rose Revolution“ in November 2003) and Ukraine (the "Orange Revolution“ from late November 2004 to January 2005 and finally in 2013/2014), but failed in Moldova and Iran in 2009. The same source claims that the Georgian opposition were taught in Serbia, while their Ukrainian colleagues of the "Orange Revolution“ were drilled also in Serbia and in Georgia.[16] From the time of the end of the Cold War (1989) Serbia remained as a symbol of independence and disobedience to the NATO’s World Order in Europe. However, the new authorities in Serbia after October 2000 obeyed to the NATO’s World Order and everything went smoothly. The dismemberment of the FRY started when having arrived in Belgrade in February 2003, Javier Solana, a top the EU representative and official, suggested to a group of officials from Serbia and Montenegro to admit that the FRY ceased to exist, and adopt the Constitution charter, written in Brussels. Its text was proclaiming, for the beginning, the appearance of a new country. Solana did not face any resistance. Consequently, the FRY was renamed to the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, and officially abolished the name ”Yugoslavia” that was in official use from 1929. In 2006 Montenegro and  Serbia declared independence, thereby ending the common South Slavic state (only Bulgarians have been out from this state as the South Slavs) established in 1918 under the original name of the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (this name was used till 1929). It was Javier Solana who did it regardless the fact that he up today remains a war criminal for majority of the Serbs as he bombed their country in 1999 as the General Secretary of the NATO killing 3,500 citizens of Serbia including and children and women with a material damage to the country around 200,000 billion US $.[17] After the year of 2000 it was easier to implement the NATO’s plans which seemed simply fantastic under Slobodan Milošević as president of Serbia and later the FRY.[18] The last Yugoslavia (Serbia & Montenegro) was undermined, its integration slowed down till final dissolution in 2006 and Serbia’s strength exhausted. What the NATO, USA and EU failed to achieve in the castle of Rambouillet (in France) in 1998/1999 (during the ultimatum-negotiations with S. Milošević on Kosovo crisis) and through 78 days of cruel and inhuman bombing in March-June 1999, they got on July 18th, 2005, when Serbia and Montenegro signed a deal with the NATO “On the Lines of Communication”. This was a technical agreement which allows the NATO’s personnel and equipment to transit through the country. Under the deal, the NATO could enjoy such opportunities for quite a long time – “until all peacekeeping operations in the Balkans are over”. Thus the NATO was given the green light to enlarge its presence in the region and control the army of both Serbia and Montenegro. On April 1st, 2009 Albania and Croatia have completed the accession process, and have joined the NATO as full members and at a such a way surrounding Serbia and Montenegro by NATO members from all sides except from Bosnian-Herzegovinian. Today the Balkans are NATO’s permanent military base. For instance, in October 2008 Serbia’s defence minister and the NATO’s officials signed agreement on information security, which allows the NATO to control everyone who deals with their documents or just cooperates with them. For the very reason the NATO insisted on secrecy of the negotiations with Serbia. The aftermath of the 1999 aggression on Serbia and Montenegro for the NATO was the most favourable. Nobody condemned NATO and they felt even more confident in global perspective (Afghanistan in 2001, Iraq in 2003…). In the recent years the world has witnessed that the NATO was making several attempts of its own expansion. Currently, the NATO’s military bloc is occupying more positions at the Balkans, using old and building new military camps with attempt to include into its organization Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina (the later one after cancellation of the Republic of Srpska). Still existing a huge NATO’s military camp "Bondsteel“ in Kosovo & Metohija is the best proof that the region is going to be under the US/NATO’s dominance for a longer period of time if the balance between the Great Powers (the US/Russia/China) will not be changed. However, the current crisis over Ukraine is the first herald of such change, i.e. of the beginning of the new Cold War era. The most disappointed fact in the present post-war Kosovo reality is for sure an ethnic and cultural cleansing of all non-Albanians and not-Albanian cultural heritage under the NATO/KFOR/EULEX/UNMIK umbrella. The proofs are evident and visible on every corner of Kosovo territory, but purposely not covered by the western mass media and politicians. For instance, on the arrival of the KFOR (an international, but in fact the NATO’s "Kosovo Forces“) and the UNMIK (the "United Nations’ Mission in Kosovo“) to Kosovo & Metohija in 1999, all names of the towns and streets in this province were renamed to have the (Muslim) Albanian forms or new names. The monuments to Serbian heroes like the monument  devoted to duke Lazar (who led the Serbian Christian army during the Kosovo Battle on June 28th, 1389 against the Muslim Turks) in the town of Gnjilane, were demolished. The Serbs were and are getting killed, assassinated, wounded and abducted, their houses burned to the ground. As we mentioned earlier, the most infamous ethnic cleansing was done between March 17th and 19th 2004 – the "March Pogrom“. As of today, a number of the Serbs that were killed or went missing in Kosovo & Metohija from June 1999 onward (after the KFOR arrived), is measured in thousands, the number of demolished Serbian Christian Orthodox churches and monasteries is measured in hundreds, and the number of burned down Serbian houses in tens of thousands. Even though the KFOR had as much as 50,000 soldiers in the beginning as well as several thousand of policemen and civilian mission members, mainly none of the above mentioned crimes have been solved. In fact, murdering a Serb in Kosovo is not considered as a crime, on a contrary, the murderers of children and the elderly are being rewarded as heroes by their ethnic Albanian compatriots. The province is almost ethnically cleaned like Albania and Croatia. For the matter-of-fact, according to the last pre-war official Yugoslav census of 1991 there were 13% of non-Albanians in Kosovo & Metohija (in reality surely more). However, it is estimated that today 97% of Kosovo & Metohija’s population is only the ethnic Albanian. In the light of the main national goal by the Albanians – the establishment of another Albanian state in the Balkans and Europe, as the first step towards the pan-Albanian state unification – we can "understand“ why it is important to destroy any Serbian trace in the "territory defined by the aspirations“.[19] In the name of a Greater Albania The final stage of cutting of Kosovo & Metohija from their motherland of Serbia came on February 17th, 2008 when Kosovo Albanians received Washington’s permission to proclaim its formal (quasi)independence what happened in fact later than expected by Russia and China. At the UN Security Council Moscow said "no“ to Kosovo’s independence as Russia respects interests of Serbia and officially condemns all attempts to impose decisions on other members of the international community by breaking the international law (in the Kosovo & Metohija case it is the UN Resolution 1244). The fact is that the Serbs have not forgotten Kosovo, but have not done much about it either. Now there are some 80 states that recognized Kosovo independence, including 23 EU and 24 NATO members (out of 192 UNO members).[20] Almost all of them are the neighbours of Serbia and with the exception of Bosnia-Herzegovina all the ex-Yugoslav republics have recognized Kosovo. Bosnia-Herzegovina did not recognize it for the very reason: the Republic of Srpska, still as an autonomous political unit within Bosnia-Herzegovina alongside with the Muslim-Croat Federation according to the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement in 1995, has and use the veto right. At the moment, in Kosovo there is the EULEX (European civil mission) and the Kosovo issue is gradually being moved out of the UNO jurisdiction and out of reach of the Russian veto in the UN Security Council becoming more and more the NATO and the EU governed territory. There is and the so-called Kosovo Security Forces (in fact the redressed members of the KLA, which is formed according to Martti Ahtisaari’s plan with active support from the NATO to be in the next years transformed into the regular Army of the Republic of Kosovo. What is true about today political reality in Kosovo & Metohija is a fact that this territory in a form of a client (quasi)state is given to be administered by the members of the KLA – a military organization which was in 1998 proclaimed by the US administration as a terrorist one. Anyway, the KLA is the first successful rebellious movement and terrorist organisation in Europe after the WWII. The movement was originally developed from a tiny Albanian diaspora in Switzerland in the second half of the 1980s to around 18.000 soldiers[21] financed and clearly supported by all means by the US administration.[22] In order to realize its own crucial political task – a separation of Kosovo & Metohija province from the rest of Serbia with a possibility to unite it with Albania, the KLA was allied with the NATO between 1997-1999. The KLA’s strategy of the war terror was based on a long tradition of the Albanians to oppose by arms any organized authority in a form of a state from the Ottoman time up today. However, the military intervention by the NATO in 1999 against Serbia and Montenegro over the Kosovo question was portrayed in the American and the West European media as a necessary step to prevent the Serbian armed forces from repeating the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia-Herzegovina. But the truth was that Serbia trained its military on Kosovo & Metohija because of an ongoing armed struggle by the KLA’s terrorist and separatist organization to wrest independence from Serbia for the sake of creation of a Greater Albania with ethnically pure Kosovo & Metohija and later on the western parts of the FYR of Macedonia, the Eastern Montenegro and the Greek Epirus.[23] Nevertheless, an active US President Barrack Obama congratulated at the very beginning of his presidential mandate the leaders of the "multiethnic, independent and democratic Kosovo“ regardless to the facts that those leaders (especially Hashim Tachi – the "Snake“ and Ramush Haradinay) are proved to be notorious war criminals, that the region (state?) is not either multicultural, nor really independent and particularly not democratic one. However, there are several official EU’s declarations and unofficial political statements encouraging Belgrade and Priština to cooperate and "develop neighbourly relations“ what practically means for Serbia that Belgrade has firstly to recognize Albanian Kosovo independence in order to become the EU member state after the years or even decades of negotiations. The another fact is that the process of international recognizing of the Kosovo’s independence is much slower that Priština and Washington expected at the beginning. From the time of Kosovo’s self-proclamation of independence Serbia’s greatest diplomatic "success“ is the majority of votes in 2008 of the UNO General Assembly supporting the decision that the case of Kosovo independence should be considered by the International Court of Justice in the Hague (established in 1899). On the one hand, the Court’s decision on the issue in July 2010 was very favourable for Kosovo’s Albanian (the KLA’s) separatists and terrorists as it was concluded a verdict that an unilateral proclamation of Kosovo’s independence in February 2008 was done within a framework of the international law. However, on the other hand, the Court’s verdict in 2010 already became also very favourable for separatism movements elsewhere like in March 2014 for the separatists in Crimean Peninsula or maybe soon for their colleagues from Catalonia, Scotland, the Northern Italy (Lega Nord)…[24] Kosovo’s self-proclamation of independence has a direct domino effect only a few months later when in August 2008 the South Ossetia and Abkhazia did the same from Georgia.[25] The (murky) reality in the present day Kosovo & Metohija, on the other side, is that there is not a single ethnic Albanian party at the deeply divided Kosovo’s political scene which would be ready to accept a "peaceful reintegration“ of the region into Serbia’s political sphere and there is not a single ethnic Albanian politician who is not concerned about the danger posed by the "division of Kosovo“ to the Albanian (major) part and Serbian (minor) part and does not oppose slightest suggestions of the Serbian autonomy for the northern portion of Kosovo & Metohija. However, what is more important: Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian leaders and even the citizens of the Albanian ethnic origin do not even consider national dilemma like "Europe or independence!“ There is no doubt what their answer is going to be in that case. On the other side, what is going on about and in Serbia? The answer is that a nation unable to make a choice between a territorial integrity on the one side, and a membership in an international association (although an important one) on the other, i.e. a nation who cannot choose between these two "priorities“ really deserves to lose both. At the end, if the international law and fixed order are broken on the one side of the globe (ex. Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq) it is nothing strange to expect that the same law and order are going to be broken somewhere else (ex. at the Caucasus, Ukraine, Spain, United Kingdom, Italy, France…) following the logic of the so-called "domino effect“ reaction in the international relations. Finally, it has to be noted that if the Albanian extremism is not stopped, the FYR of Macedonia and Montenegro will have to give parts of their territories populated by the ethnic Albanians (the Western Macedonia and the Eastern Montenegro). In this case, Europe will have to decide how to discuss the issue of the borders’ revision and how to recognize a new enlarged state of a Greater Albania. Bibliography & Notes [listed in source article] Assoc. Professor Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic, Mykolas Romeris University, Institute of Political Sciences, vladislav@sotirovic.eu www.sotirovic.eu http://www.globalresearch.ca/ethnic-cleansing-in-kosovo-and-the-rights-of-the-serbian-minority-ten-years-after-the-march-pogrom-2004/5416867 HILLARY 2016 HILLARY 2016 CLINTON 1999 ILLEGAL BOMBING SERBIA & MONTENEGRO HEAD-HUNTING Facilitated by US-NATO & European Union Madeleine Albright US Secretary of State 500,000 Iraqi Dead Kids Worth It "From the position of the USA Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright pushed for the bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, when NATO planes bombed without a UN mandate. She also supported the jihad in Bosnia during 1992-1995, and the manipulation of the facts about Srebrenica, but also personally earned from privatization of Kosovo Telecommunications. She should therefore bear the consequences of her political decisions and acknowledge responsibility for the bloodshed, in which thousands of civilians were killed." [here] US-NATO Drops Graffiti Bombs on Kids Targets Serbian Ethnicity "As Secretary of State, she will be remembered for two acts: the expansion of NATO to the East and the bombing of Yugoslavia. Being a native of Prague, she strongly lobbied for the accession of the Czech Republic and other former socialist countries to the North Atlantic alliance. All the objections of Russia were swept aside. In 1997, the Czech Republic, Poland and Hungary joined the ranks of NATO. Thus began the advancement of U.S. military vehicles towards Russia's borders." "In March of 1999, Albright was among those who made the decision to bomb Yugoslavia. It is interesting that she spent part of her childhood in Belgrade with her father. She knows the local language. At one time her father left for the West from Yugoslavia. But for the sake of U.S. interests in Europe and NATO's eastward advance her personal issues were swept aside." [here] US-Supported BOSNIA Mutilated & Roasted Corpse (Serbian) US-NATO Bombing 78-day US-NATO Bombing Destruction: abt. USD $200,000-billion   US Empire Empire Twitter Troll Mike McFaul Sings the Praises of: 'legitimate use of force within one's borders' as definition of sovereignty COMMENT Great article. Really enjoyed examining this. Check out the lies Obama told the American and world's public not long after his appointment.  The same Obama, with the weekly kill-list was awarded the farce of a 'Peace Prize'. What mostly stood out for me (but my retention etc. is on the scant side ... lol): US-NATO, European Union and the joke that is United Nations, align themselves with a bunch of mafia criminals and terrorist clans, backing formation of a US-NATO client state run by organ harvesting, drug dealing, crooks (crooks who are aligned with this US-NATO lot, for the sake of creating a greater Albania)? The bonus for US-NATO, European Union and the joke that is United Nations is that this creates a domino effect elsewhere in Europe, leveraging pressure, drama and threat to Russia, which the greedy, grasping, thieves with aims of world domination, seek to weaken in order to destroy, dismantle and dominate.  Dismembering the Federation of Russia, like they did the Balkans states (which they now control), so that they can likewise control the Russian region. US-NATO used force in 1999 without US Security Council approval, which is illegal under international law and is described as an act of PURE (US-NATO LED) AGGRESSION. The attack on the sovereignty and integrity of Yugoslavia (Serbia, Montenegro) served to enhance the US empire's global domination strategy. However, it also set a precedent for wars of aggression under the pretext of 'humanitarian' intervention -- and this went unchallenged by the Western media. The ILLEGAL US-NATO LED WAR OF AGGRESSION ON SERBIA paved the way to more of the same: Afghanistan 2001 Iraq 2003 UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), shored up the US-NATO farce re 'protection of universal human & minority rights', essentially TRANSFERRING Serbia's Autonomous Region of Kosovo & Metohija (the proper title & legal standing for same), to US-NATO (in the guise of assumption of 'protection' pursuant to 'responsibility to protect' doctrine of lies, that was to see the region come under 'international' authorities ... which is itself a lie:  the region has, in effect, come under US-NATO control,  and US-NATO has set itself up a HUGE military base and military presence (not for protection -- see slaughter & destruction by ethnic Albanian -- US-NATO pretexts for US-NATO presence in Balkans) -- but for the purposes of US-NATO's wider strategic ambitions). Meanwhile, there is NO ETHNIC diversity etc, & the US is lying:  there is ethnic cleansing of Serbs, mass destruction, the "March Pogrom of 2004" right under US-NATO noses and the ERASURE of Serbian historical roots in a region with centuries' long-standing Serbian presence. CIA had a hand in this:  via 'Otpor' (ie 'Resistance'), which was sponsored by CIA and the West, mounting the 'Revolution of the Fifth of October 2000' in Belgrade, Serbia. Method applied elsewhere: * 'Rose Revolution' - Georgia - Nov. 2003     -- CIA trained in Serbia * 'Orange Revolution' - Ukraine  - Nov. 2004  - Jan 2005 - final CIA coup:  2013-2014     -- CIA trained in Serbia & Georgia * failed attempts 2009:     * Moldova     * Iran Dismemberment of Serbia Montenegro -- look to:  2003, Javier Solana -- EU representative -- CONSTITUTION CHARTER written Brussels -- proclaims new country:  State Union of Serbia & Montenegro -- officially abolishing Yugoslavia name (entity?), officially in use since  1929 -- orig. est. 1918 as 'Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats & Slovenes' -- 2006 - Serbia & Montenegro 'declare independence' - split -- ending common south Slavic state -- Bulgarians appear to be the only south Slav state left (?) -- what US-NATO & the EU got out of 'On the Lines of Communication' 2005 NATO/Serbia/Montenegro deal     -- *open-ended deal     -- is what imperialist sought to achieve with: 1998/1999:  castle of Rambouillet (France) ULTIMATUM negs. w. Slobodan Milosevic 78 days of ILLEGAL US-NATO BOMBING of Serbia & Montenegro -- NATO was thus given     -- go-ahead to ENLARGE its presence in Balkans region     -- control of Serbia & Montenegro armies -- 2009:  Albania & Croatia join NATO as full members -- Serbia & Montenegro SURROUNDED (bar BiH state) -- 2008:  Agreement on Information Security (US-NATO / Serbia) -- secrecy provisions re NATO negotiations w/ Serbia -= NATO control over parties to NATO agreements Global Perspective: -- US-NATO:  NATO expansion attempts:     -- Afghanistan 2001     -- Iraq 2003     -- US-NATO military bloc Balkans occupation     The 'International Court of Justice' -- another Hague body est. 1899 -- sounds like more of the supranational US empire serving institutions -- backed US-NATO-Kosovo theft of Serbian territory -- likely to produce domino effects elsewhere, when international law & fixed order is reversed Not sure how much of this I'll remember, but it's been good reading this.  Think I might need to make a point-form list to help me remember. It makes sense of all that MASSIVE and unprecedented Hollywood and slaphead William Hague's propaganda campaigning.  What a bunch of deceitful, manipulative, lying creeps. And nobody in the controlled media challenges this? So the controlled media is then also responsible for the subsequent illegal war of aggression on Iraq (2003) and the war on Afghanistan ... oh, Libya & whoever else there is in this trail of US-NATO colonialist destruction. And what do they use for the purposes of sowing:   regime change; pretext for invasion; aggression; and dismemberment of sovereign states, as a prelude to Western control and exploitation: Saturation marketed, hijacked, & exploited 'hoomanitarian grounds', along with a bunch of liberal fairy floss that they've been flogging in the corporate media and in Western institutions for decades ... ahead of sending in brainwashed, useful idiots, to man Western-sponsored NGO fifth columns, to pave the way to destruction from the inside, as a modern-day colonialists' trojan. CHECK OUT THIS PROPAGANDA MONSTROSITY from the Wikipedia CIA instrument of public opinion shaping: Subject:  Dnevni Telegraph Danas (ie. Daily Telegraph Today) -- here "At a time when NATO threatened with airstrikes, the regime was becoming more radicalized by the second."  Wikipedia's only good for dates and locations, maybe.  Even they're suspect.  The rest ought to be read with a cautious and critical eye. The only thing that was 'radicalised' is America's CIA trained useful idiots and their criminal clan puppets.