TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts

January 23, 2016

Two-faced, deceitful, shameless, undemocratic Saudi Arab butt-kissing British government scumbags

LONDON: 
Saudi Businessman Cleared of Rape
'Tripped & Fell into Rape'




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P51OP7cATPc

LONDON:
"A SAUDI millionaire was cleared of raping a teenager after claiming he may have penetrated her accidentally when he fell on her.

Property developer Ehsan Abdulaziz, 46, was accused of attacking the 18-year-old as she slept on his sofa after a night out. "

CONTINUED
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6807564/Saudi-millionaire-cleared-of-charges-after-claiming-he-accidentally-fell-on-victim.html

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------


The tripped-and-raped in London guy came up today as a footnote to an RT News article I quickly skimmed ... and I initially mistook Sheikh Walid Juffali for the tripped-and-raped Saudi guy.  Oops.

Sheikh Walid Juffali  has been appointed UN envoy figurehead of a Caribbean former British colony's  maritime organisation of some description, which is rather handy now that the Sheikh can invoke diplomatic immunity to sidestep beating off  the ex-wife's lawyers in a British court.
 
Sheikh-Your-Missus is aiming to rely on diplomatic immunity to sidestep having to address the British lawsuit mounted by pissed off (or maybe even relieved?) Wife No. 3, after the billionaire acquired a newer-model, Lebanese TV hostess, Wife No. 4.

 
Lawyers for the Sheikh argue that he is entitled to diplomatic immunity pursuant to:

Article 15
of the
International Maritime Organisation (IMO)
(Immunities and Privileges) Order 2015


Meanwhile, lawyers on the other side argue that he hasn't attended any of the 25 IMO meetings in the 19 months he's been in the post (Independent). 

The chihuahua-sized British satellite Caribbean island reportedly informed the British Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) that it intends to permit the Sheikh to invoke diplomatic immunity  ...

Once again, that spares the Sheikh's legal team having to fend off Wife No. 3's  lawyers in a British court.

For its part, the British FCO assures the tabloid-reading rabble that all is above board,  proclaiming that this is not an abuse of privileges associated with the principle of diplomatic immunity granted by the British sidekick Saint Lucia government and, basically, that the tiny British sidekick has thought fit to knock back British request to waiver diplomatic immunity.

In a nice little twist, 'diplomatic immunity' is something that the British keep invoking and treating as if it were the holy of holies to the British ... whenever politically expedient

The British government reverence at the holy shrine of 'diplomatic immunity' is an especially handy resort, the British find, when the British must explain to a voting public concerned about Palestinian civilian deaths, why the British have repeatedly declined to arrest Israeli politicians for alleged war crimes.

Despite the British pronouncements, it's plain to see that the British professed regard for 'diplomatic immunity' is selective and rather suspect when the two-faced, deceitful, shameless, undemocratic, Saudi Arab butt-kissing, British government scumbags have already threatened to raid the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in 2012, and have thus threatened to violate Ecuador's diplomatic status:

Source
Sydney Morning Herald | here

Source
Sydney Morning Herald | here

EXTRACT 16.08.2012

Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino told a news conference that Ecuador had received a written threat on Wednesday from Britain that "it could assault our embassy" if Assange was not handed over.

He said the threat was delivered to Ecuador's Foreign Ministry and ambassador in London.

Any such incursion would be "without modern precedent" and could end up before the international courts, an Australian law expert said.

Professor Donald Rothwell, from Australian National University College of Law, said the government's stance shows just how serious Britain is about extraditing the WikiLeaks founder to Sweden.

"The Ecuadorian embassy enjoys protection under Article 22 of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations which precludes the United Kingdom authorities from entering the embassy without consent. Assange has enjoyed the protection of the embassy since he sought asylum there on June 19, 2012.

"If the United Kingdom revoked the embassy's diplomatic protection and entered the embassy to arrest Assange, Ecuador could rightly view this as a significant violation of international law which may find its way before an international court."


Source
Sydney Morning Herald | here

Extraordinary
Diplomatic Stand-Off 
My Ass





[Hope the above makes sense.  Brain is in go-slow mode.  Everything feels like it's taking a million years to do, and I can't remember what I'm doing, even as I'm doing it ... lol]

January 16, 2016

British 'Justice' - Crown Prosecution Service - Former Labour MP Lord Janner cf. US Target Journalist Assange

Article
SOURCE
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/15/greville-janner-child-sex-abuse-case-dropped




BRITISH 'JUSTICE'
Crown Prosecution Service
Former Labour MP
Lord Janner
Charged with 22 Sexual Offences dating back to the 1960s
MISHANDLED INVESTIGATION
DROPPED PROCEEDINGS
cf.
US TARGET
JOURNALIST ASSANGE
Detained Over 5 Years
WITHOUT CHARGE

 "Greville Janner child sex abuse case: alleged victims damn decision to drop proceedings"
(The Guardian)



POLITICAL PERSECUTION


RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select: 'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/15/greville-janner-child-sex-abuse-case-dropped

Greville Janner child sex abuse case: alleged victims damn decision to drop proceedings

Rajeev Syal, Jamie Grierson and Ben Quinn

Saturday 16 January 2016 05.29 AEDT


Alleged victims of sexual abuse by Greville Janner have hit out at the decision to drop court proceedings against the late peer, saying it amounted to “an establishment cover-up from day one”.

The case against the former Labour MP, who was charged with 22 sexual offences dating back to the 1960s against nine boys and men, was set to be heard in a trial of the facts from which Lord Janner would be absent because of his dementia.

After his death last month, prosecutors suggested the trial could go ahead posthumously. But on Friday the prosecutor Richard Whittam QC told the trial judge, Mr Justice Openshaw, that the crown would not go ahead with the proceedings planned for the Old Bailey in April.

A long-awaited independent report into why it took decades to bring Lord Janner to court to face child sex abuse charges is due to be published this coming week, sources have told the Guardian.

The Crown Prosecution Service and Leicestershire police are expected to face severe criticisms from retired judge Richard Henriques for mishandling investigations into the late peer in 1991, 2002 and 2007.

One solicitor who represents alleged Janner victims said the report could shed light upon claims that the police were pressured by politicians to drop their previous inquiries.

One alleged victim said on Friday that the decision to drop proceedings against the former MP would increase suspicion of “an establishment cover-up from day one” that stopped Janner from appearing before the courts.

The 54-year-old man, who has claimed he was abused repeatedly in a children’s home by Janner over several years, said: “I am really disappointed. He was already deemed unfit to stand trial and wasn’t going to be in court anyway, so his death shouldn’t have made a difference.

“The fact that he kicked the bucket should not have mattered. For once, they should have thought about the victims and let us go to court and let the court decide if we were telling the truth.”

The alleged victim’s case mirrors that of others who have said they were based in children’s homes in Leicestershire when Janner, the then MP for Leicester West, was introduced to them.

The man’s account and those of other alleged victims were first given to the police in 1991 and were raised again with detectives in 2005. After a further inquiry in 2014, Leicestershire police said there was enough evidence to pursue a legal case against Janner.

The alleged victim, a labourer, said the decision would leave many feeling abandoned by the justice system.

“I was going to go to court and tell them what happened,” he said. “I thought I was finally going to get some closure. Think what us, the victims, have been through. We were abused by a powerful man. When we plucked up courage to speak to the police, they didn’t believe us; decades later, we finally get near to a court and, somehow, he gets away with it and cheats the court because he dies.”

The BBC, which has interviewed dozens of men and women who lived in children’s homes in Leicestershire in the 70s and 80s, reported on Friday that 12 former residents had claimed they were abused by Janner.

The broadcaster spoke to council officials, social workers, police officers and journalists involved in investigating the case of Frank Beck, a notorious care home manager who was eventually convicted of child abuse.

The BBC reported that lawyers were now representing at least 20 men and one woman, including the 12 residents of children’s homes, who say the former MP abused them and that police had said they had information from 25 alleged victims.

Liz Dux, of Slater and Gordon, who represents a number of Janner’s alleged victims, said the claims against the former Labour MP were of the most “serious nature”.

“My clients are absolutely devastated that they won’t give their evidence in a criminal court,” she said. “They totally understand the reasons why, but that doesn’t make up for the real travesty – that many gave their statements decades ago and have been denied justice through a failure to prosecute earlier when Janner was alive and well, and that’s something they can’t get over.

“The next stage is the only opportunity for them to have their evidence heard, by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse led by Judge Goddard. We’re hoping there will be an announcement by the Goddard inquiry shortly.

“I hope they prioritise the Lord Janner case and that they will hear my client in person and make findings of facts so there are judicial findings made and then made public.

“What is very disappointing is there was a painstaking inquiry by Leicestershire police since 2013 with a lot of other witnesses’ evidence, who weren’t victims but who were there to corroborate what victims were alleging. That evidence won’t be heard either.”

At the time of Janner’s death on 19 December, the prosecution had an application pending to introduce a second tranche of charges, which covered additional victims.

Janner was subject to three police investigations between 1991 and 2007. The CPS had, in those inquiries, decided there was insufficient evidence to charge Janner as a result of two of the investigations while the police did not submit a file to prosecutors on the third one.

In April last year, the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, said the evidential test was passed, but that “mistakes in the decision-making” were made by Leicestershire police in 2002 and the CPS in 1991 and 2007.

The report by Henriques into the failures of previous inquiries last spring, which is expected to be released within days, will “go further” in its criticisms, sources say.

The report’s findings will be closely examined by lawyers representing at least 20 alleged victims of Janner who are already pursuing civil proceedings against the peer’s estate.

Some alleged victims have voiced suspicions that ministers and senior politicians from the Conservative party and Labour may have interfered in police inquiries.

Peter Garsden, head of QualitySolicitors Abney Garsden, said: “I hope the Henriques review will elaborate upon whether the police were put under pressure by the government not to prosecute Janner, something which has long been rumoured.

“The victims will await its publication with anticipation of it uncovering any cover-up which took place in the past. This has led to them being denied justice at a time when Janner was not lacking in capacity.”

Another legal source claimed that the report could also lead to civil cases against the police or the CPS.


http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jan/15/greville-janner-child-sex-abuse-case-dropped




---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT


Is this the same British Crown Prosecution Service that has deprived Australian journalist Julian Assange of his liberty for over five years (without charge), having advised their Swedish counterparts not to interview Assange in Britain, and therefore having denied Assange an opportunity to defend himself in relation to Sweden's dubious 'allegations' and strategically stalled 'investigation'?

Oh, and are these the same British authorities that have now spent just shy of $20-million American dollars ($28-million Australian) detaining Assange at the Embassy of Ecuador, under 24/7 police-guard siege spanning in excess of 3 years, during which time the said British authorities have blocked his lawfully granted (and patently justified) political asylum, in violation of international law and conventions?

Hmmmm ... I keep saying this and I'll say it again, because that's what it is:   political persecution.

[Oooops ... Excuse the typos galore.  Hopefully all fixed now.]

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT

 RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT



September 21, 2014

USA: It's On Us | VAWA (1994) + MVRA


U.S.A.


USA - VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT – MANDATORY VICTIMS RESTITUTION ACT – FEDERAL SEXUAL VIOLENCE CAMPAIGN

It's On Us
So much comedic material in the US - Celebrities urge young men to protect female friends by making sure they get home safely.

>> Now women in US are 'crippled' second-class citizens who are appointed a patriarchal figure to spirit them home?

Advert: "It's on us to stop sexual assault" ... "To get in the way before it happens."/Joe Biden + ors feature in WH campaign

The Coalface

Clemson University

#USA Clemson Uni suspended mandatory online course that asked students & faculty about their sex lives & drinking habits following backlash!

>> US is INSANE: "Q. supposed to serve the purpose of educating students on gender equality to prevent sexual violence" !!

>Q's such as: "How many times have you had sex?" & "With how many different people have you had sex?" raised privacy concerns.

- schools across country R experimenting w/ new approaches 2 sexual harass/prevent/ & ed Federal law.


VAWA (1994) + MVRA

VAWA (1994) encouraged states to adopt mandatory arrest policies that allowed DV cases to move forward without the cooperation of victims.

A lucrative DV industry in US - $1.6 billion>> "One of greatest successes of VAWA is emphasis on a coordinated comm/response"

>Involves mandatory 'restitution' > this is fine? .. assume it is to State (?) - 2007 $50 billion outstanding Fed. crim debt!

>> Nope. It's money to 'make victims whole' .. US is warped.



>> Looks like fair few civil liberties issues assoc. w/ the Act. - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_

> Reauthorisation of Act signed by Obama March 2013: govtrack.us/congress/bills



Out of $50 bill uncollected restitution - $10 bill is govt $$

MVRA /Mand.Vict.Rest.Act - mandate that judges order FULL restitution irrespective of MEANS ...[blood out of stone?]


COMMENT

This struck me as some very interesting information.





September 20, 2014

Norway - Prisons & US Corporatisation of Prisons

NORWAY



#Norway - more convicted prisoners than beds / 1,300 @ home waiting to serve sentences / Norway 2 send prisoners 2 Netherlands /businessweek

UN says Norway's borrowing of US practices is WORRYING - Belgians already housing Dutch prisoners / $52mil rent - SO WRONG!!

USA - Corporatisation of Prisons 

>> US shift Federal inmates around the country as standard practice.  Same x4 US states. Can invest in prisons in US.  SICKOS!

Here's the deets on investment in CORRECTIONS CORP OF AMERICA investing.businessweek.com/research/stock


>>> OMG!! They're prisoners of CORPORATE AMERICA #WallStreet -- US society is really SICK.


----------------------------------------

#Norway central bank, Norges Bank, announced Thurs/ it has decided 2 keep key policy rate unchanged at 1.5% - b/c output & inflation same

>> However, policy rates were lowered in Euro area + Sweden -- article re this & the above here: goo.gl/qhQCTd

----------------------------------------

COMMENT

Find it really disturbing that prisoners a moved across national borders in Europe and that there appears to be a move to corporatising prisons, like the US.

The US shifting prisoners across internal borders is also disturbing, as is the full-on corporatisation of prisons -- to the extent that this is a money-spinner for investors!

So wrong.