Two-faced, deceitful, shameless, undemocratic Saudi Arab butt-kissing British government scumbags

ꕤ LONDON:  Saudi Businessman Cleared of Rape 'Tripped & Fell into Rape' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P51OP7cATPc LONDON: "A SAUDI millionaire was cleared of raping a teenager after claiming he may have penetrated her accidentally when he fell on her. Property developer Ehsan Abdulaziz, 46, was accused of attacking the 18-year-old as she slept on his sofa after a night out. " CONTINUED http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6807564/Saudi-millionaire-cleared-of-charges-after-claiming-he-accidentally-fell-on-victim.html ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- The tripped-and-raped in London guy came up today as a footnote to an RT News article I quickly skimmed ... and I initially mistook Sheikh Walid Juffali for the tripped-and-raped Saudi guy.  Oops. Sheikh Walid Juffali  has been appointed UN envoy figurehead of a Caribbean former British colony's  maritime organisation of some description, which is rather handy now that the Sheikh can invoke diplomatic immunity to sidestep beating off  the ex-wife's lawyers in a British court.   Sheikh-Your-Missus is aiming to rely on diplomatic immunity to sidestep having to address the British lawsuit mounted by pissed off (or maybe even relieved?) Wife No. 3, after the billionaire acquired a newer-model, Lebanese TV hostess, Wife No. 4.   Lawyers for the Sheikh argue that he is entitled to diplomatic immunity pursuant to: Article 15 of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) (Immunities and Privileges) Order 2015 Meanwhile, lawyers on the other side argue that he hasn't attended any of the 25 IMO meetings in the 19 months he's been in the post (Independent).  The chihuahua-sized British satellite Caribbean island reportedly informed the British Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) that it intends to permit the Sheikh to invoke diplomatic immunity  ... Once again, that spares the Sheikh's legal team having to fend off Wife No. 3's  lawyers in a British court. For its part, the British FCO assures the tabloid-reading rabble that all is above board,  proclaiming that this is not an abuse of privileges associated with the principle of diplomatic immunity granted by the British sidekick Saint Lucia government and, basically, that the tiny British sidekick has thought fit to knock back British request to waiver diplomatic immunity. In a nice little twist, 'diplomatic immunity' is something that the British keep invoking and treating as if it were the holy of holies to the British ... whenever politically expedient.  The British government reverence at the holy shrine of 'diplomatic immunity' is an especially handy resort, the British find, when the British must explain to a voting public concerned about Palestinian civilian deaths, why the British have repeatedly declined to arrest Israeli politicians for alleged war crimes. Despite the British pronouncements, it's plain to see that the British professed regard for 'diplomatic immunity' is selective and rather suspect when the two-faced, deceitful, shameless, undemocratic, Saudi Arab butt-kissing, British government scumbags have already threatened to raid the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in 2012, and have thus threatened to violate Ecuador's diplomatic status: Source Sydney Morning Herald | here Source Sydney Morning Herald | here EXTRACT 16.08.2012 Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino told a news conference that Ecuador had received a written threat on Wednesday from Britain that "it could assault our embassy" if Assange was not handed over. He said the threat was delivered to Ecuador's Foreign Ministry and ambassador in London. Any such incursion would be "without modern precedent" and could end up before the international courts, an Australian law expert said. Professor Donald Rothwell, from Australian National University College of Law, said the government's stance shows just how serious Britain is about extraditing the WikiLeaks founder to Sweden. "The Ecuadorian embassy enjoys protection under Article 22 of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations which precludes the United Kingdom authorities from entering the embassy without consent. Assange has enjoyed the protection of the embassy since he sought asylum there on June 19, 2012. "If the United Kingdom revoked the embassy's diplomatic protection and entered the embassy to arrest Assange, Ecuador could rightly view this as a significant violation of international law which may find its way before an international court." Source Sydney Morning Herald | here Extraordinary Diplomatic Stand-Off  My Ass  The Independent [Hope the above makes sense.  Brain is in go-slow mode.  Everything feels like it's taking a million years to do, and I can't remember what I'm doing, even as I'm doing it ... lol] ꕤ