UKRAINE - More US War Monger Propaganda - Send ARMS

Even a Russian invasion of Ukraine won't disturb Obama's vacation By Jed Babbin | August 13, 2014 | 6:02 pm Two crises – one in Iraq and one in Ukraine – aren’t enough to disturb President Obama’s vacation. [...] If that weren’t enough, Ukraine is apparently facing an imminent Russian invasion, cloaked as a “humanitarian” mission, which the Ukrainians have vowed to turn back at their border. Fifty-eight years ago, President Dwight Eisenhower faced a very similar scenario. When Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, Britain, France and Israel sent troops to contest his action. While Ike was preoccupied with Suez, Hungarians rebelled against Soviet oppression. Eisenhower was entirely focused and gauged the risk of war with Russia too great to intervene. The Soviet army crushed the rebellion and restored their puppet government.  [Jeb would rather a US puppet govt had been installed, I take it?  How predictable is it trying to goad with some comparison from the not so glorious US history.  I wouldn't be too proud of imperialist violations of national sovereignty of foreign nations for the almighty dollar.] Obama is disengaged, even disinterested. As a result, Ukraine is likely to suffer the same fate as Hungary did in 1956.  [Yeah, Obama's US$5 billion disinterested.  US is supporting neo-Nazi death squads and Biden's son is already installed in puppet Ukraine - the spoils already divided.  But Obama's 'disinterested'.] Russian strongman [He's head of state, moron.  Not a circus act.  Only circus act is in USA] Vladimir Putin is riding a wave of popularity sustained by his personal super-macho Image, which he has successfully conflated with Russia’s Image in the minds of his countrymen. American and European sanctions haven’t even paused his plan to restore Ukraine as a Russian satellite, which has been unfolding since February. Then, Russian special forces and mercenaries seized the Crimean Peninsula. Putin formally annexed it to Russia with great fanfare in March.  Russia has about 40,000 troops massed at the Ukrainian border apparently ready to invade. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told Reuters that there was no sign of Russia withdrawing its troops and that there was a “high probability” of a Russian military intervention. The only White House reaction has been a statement that an invasion would “... provoke additional consequences.” That echoes previous statements that have accompanied Obama’s ineffective sanctions.  [NATO dickhead Rasmussen says what he's told to say.  Means jack.  It's the same old bullshit propaganda from the US.] Russia has declared a humanitarian crisis in the Ukrainian cities of Donetsk and Lugansk and is dispatching a “relief” convoy of some 280 trucks. The humanitarian crisis is real, but the only part of the crisis Putin cares about is the looming defeat of the Russian-backed insurgents by Ukrainian forces. Putin’s personality, which depends on sustaining his Image, cannot allow such a defeat.  [*Eyeroll*  But his 'personality' can allow the slaughter of East Ukraine independence supporters, sponsored by US lowlifes on the make.] The Ukrainians have vowed to stop the convoy at the border and only let it proceed if it is inspected and accompanied by the International Red Cross. Most analysts conclude that the convoy will serve as the lead elements of a Russian invasion.  [This is IMMORAL. What they are doing is using humanitarian aid as a *political tool*, to smear the Russians, to create (non-existent) Russian 'threat' in the minds of the public and, ultimately, to BLOCK aid to 3.9 million people who need it.  This is a dog act, USA and EU / NATO puppets.]   That is probably wrong because the situation allows Putin to actually send relief, albeit in trucks driven by Russian army soldiers and partly laden with communications and navigation equipment along with food and water, making an invasion easier without making his intent too obvious. It’s only about a 13-hour drive from Moscow to Donetsk, so Putin has the luxury of time to load the trucks with whatever suits his plan.  [This guy is a nutjob that sees invasion at every turn.  Delivery of *aid* is not some delivery of supplies ahead of invasion.  Gee, I think if they were intent on invading, getting supplies in post invasion would be a piece of cake; no bogus aid convoy is required.  Seriously, this guy needs help.] If the Ukrainians block the convoy, Putin would blame them for blocking relief to the suffering. If they let it through, Putin can take credit. Either way, he wins. But he shouldn’t.  [Here we go; wouldn't want Putin to get *credit* where credit's due.  How mental is that?] It is late for Obama and NATO to send military supplies and aid to Ukraine, but not too late. Sending arms and speaking out in favor of Ukrainian freedom, Obama would not face a risk of war like that faced by Eisenhower.  [The war monger wants to send arms!!!  What a joke.] By failing to act, Obama strengthens Putin and encourages his aggression against Ukraine and other former Soviet satellite nations.  [Here we go, Goebbels, more Russian 'aggression' -- which is fucking non-existent to date.] Jed Babbin served as a deputy undersecretary of defense in the George H.W. Bush administration and is a senior fellow of the London Center for Policy Research. He is the author of "The BDS War Against Israel," with Herbert London. SOURCE http://washingtonexaminer.com/even-a-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-wont-disturb-obamas-vacation/article/2552007 I'm so angry reading this. The campaign of bullshit from the US and the idiocy of the Americans is astounding and anger provoking, when you consider that these people are playing with other people's lives  --  they're as good as murderers. If this fucker feels so strongly, maybe he should get on the front lines with the neo-Nazi death squad thugs -- after the US puppet government has finished shelling civilians -- and maybe he should put his money where his mouth is and take a shot on a one-to-one basis. Somehow I doubt this war monger feels that strongly. ........................................................ Excuse typos - too angry to check & edit.

Propaganda - Goebbel's Principles

PROPAGANDA GOEBBEL'S PRINCIPLES Hitler's Basic Principles These principles are abstracted from Jowett & O'Donnell.     Avoid abstract ideas - appeal to the emotions.     Constantly repeat just a few ideas. Use stereotyped phrases.     Give only one side of the argument.     Continuously criticize your opponents.     Pick out one special "enemy" for special vilification. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.     They must evoke responses which the audience previously possesses.     They must be capable of being easily learned.     They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations.     They must be boomerang-proof. SOURCE - http://www.physics.smu.edu/pseudo/Propaganda/goebbels.html ................................................................. Should be a fun game picking off phrases and slogans. 'Boomerang proof' must be the final step, when everyone's sucked up the smear campaign, and they're ready to believe anything by virtue of the subject being the personification of 'evil'. Hey, check this out: Bush Copied Hitler’s Propaganda Technique The “preventive war” propaganda used by President Bush to justify his attack on Iraq in 2003 copied that used by Hitler when he invaded Russia in 1941. Starting a preventive war was a foundation of the “Bush Doctrine.” David Walsh, a contributor to the World Socialist Web Site, writes in a new book that the Nazi regime asked the German press to portray Hitler’s invasion of Soviet Russia as a “preventive war” that was “forced” on Germany. Walsh adds this propaganda tactic “did not originate with (George W.) Bush, (Dick) Cheney, or (Donald) Rumsfeld.” It was used by Hitler. ... [the media] long ago abandoned any sense of responsibility for educating and informing the public or carrying out the critical democratic function traditionally assigned to the ‘Fourth Estate’, i.e., serving as a watchdog and check on government abuses and falsifications.” Walsh goes on to say that, “Instead it (the media) slavishly carries out the function assigned it by the ruling elite: to confuse, terrorize and intimidate the American public.” He explains how the TV networks and major dailies “are the prime source of news and information for tens of millions of people in the U.S” and are “in the hands of giant firms, controlled by fabulously wealthy individuals who will stop at nothing to defend their profits and property. The corpses of thousands, or, if necessary, millions of Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians and others are a small price to pay, as far as the media billionaires are concerned, for achieving American military and economic domination of the globe.” [Source - VeteransToday - here] ................................................................. So are Obama's bosses planning on using the Hitler-GWBush technique on Russia? Check out what David Walsh has to say about media ownership and how the media's used by the elite. Think he might have a point. edit:  oops.   Looks like I forgot link the VeteransToday article those extracts are from.  Linked to article today (Sept 2015).