TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Kerry. Show all posts

October 03, 2016

Syria: US State Department Propaganda via New York Times Propaganda Organ





ministry of tokyo








US STATE DEPARTMENT
PROPAGANDA CON JOB
via New York Times Propaganda Organ
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/john-kerry-syria-audio.html?_r=2

Audio Reveals What John Kerry
Told Syrians Behind Closed Doors


By ANNE BARNARD    SEPT. 30, 2016


BEIRUT, Lebanon — Secretary of State John Kerry was clearly exasperated, not least at his own government.

Over and over again, he complained to a small group of Syrian civilians that his diplomacy had not been backed by a serious threat of military force, according to an audio recording of the meeting obtained by The New York Times.

“I think you’re looking at three people, four people in the administration who have all argued for use of force, and I lost the argument.”


The 40-minute discussion, on the sidelines of last week’s United Nations General Assembly in New York, provides a glimpse of Mr. Kerry’s frustration with his inability to end the Syrian crisis. He veered between voicing sympathy for the Syrians’ frustration with United States policy and trying to justify it.

The conversation took place days after a brief cease-fire he had spearheaded crumbled, and as his Russian counterpart rejected outright his new proposal to stop the bombing of Aleppo. Those setbacks were followed by days of crippling Russian and Syrian airstrikes in Aleppo that the World Health Organization said Wednesday had killed 338 people, including 100 children.

At the meeting last week, Mr. Kerry was trying to explain that the United States has no legal justification for attacking Mr. Assad’s government, whereas Russia was invited in by the government.

“The problem is the Russians don’t care about international law, and we do.” [comment:  USA capitalist broke international law by arming, training and supervising terrorists that are destroying Syria.]

Mr. Kerry has been hamstrung by Russia’s military operations in Syria and by his inability to persuade Washington to intervene more forcefully. He has also been unable to sell Syrian opponents of Mr. Assad, like the ones in that room, on a policy he does not wholeheartedly believe in.

His frustrations and dissent within the Obama administration have hardly been a secret, but in the recorded conversation, Mr. Kerry lamented being outmaneuvered by the Russians, expressed disagreement with some of Mr. Obama’s policy decisions and said Congress would never agree to use force.

“We’re trying to pursue the diplomacy, and I understand it’s frustrating. You have nobody more frustrated than we are.”  [comment:  let's see.  US-Anglo & Gulf Arab, Israeli capitalism sends in goons to destroy Syria ... but now they're frustrated that their pretext of 'diplomacy' (ie demands Syria's Assad government surrender to capitalist sponsored  terrorism) is not going as planned.  the c%$ts.]

The meeting took place at the Dutch Mission to the United Nations on Sept. 22. There were perhaps 20 people around a table: representatives of four Syrian groups that provide education, rescue and medical services in rebel-held areas; diplomats from three or four countries; and Mr. Kerry’s chief of staff and special envoy for Syria. The recording was made by a non-Syrian attendee, and several other participants confirmed its authenticity.

John Kirby, a State Department spokesman, declined on Thursday evening to comment on what he described as a private conversation. He said that Mr. Kerry was “grateful for the chance to meet with this group of Syrians, to hear their concerns firsthand and to express our continued focus on ending this civil war.”

Several of the Syrian participants said afterward that they had left the meeting demoralized, convinced that no further help would come from the Obama administration. One, a civil engineer named Mustafa Alsyofi, said Mr. Kerry had effectively told the Syrian opposition, “You have to fight for us, but we will not fight for you.”  [comment:  LMAO, get out the violins for the 'demoralised' NGO shills who are paving the way for US capitalist destruction of Syria.  Go f*ck yourselves, lying NYT propaganda organ and tape leaking company.  F*ckholes.  Do not fall for this sh*t.  It is these assh*les that are responsible for all the dead, because they engineered, supplied, trained and funded the 'opposition' attack on the legitimate Syrian government.  ]

“How can this be accepted by anyone?” Mr. Alsyofi asked. “It’s unbelievable."

In the meeting, he and the others pressed Mr. Kerry politely but relentlessly on what they saw as contradictions in American policy. Their comments crystallized the widespread sense of betrayal even among the Syrians most attractive to Washington as potential partners, civilians pushing for pluralistic democracy[comment:  the c*nts.  These are US-Anglo capitalist shills being used to destroy an independent nation, for the US-Anglo-Israeli-Gulf Arab capitalists to exploit and control, by selling the lie of 'spreading democracy' to the public.  The lying assh*les.  ]

One woman, Marcell Shehwaro, demanded “the bottom line,” asking “how many Syrians” had to be killed to prompt serious action.  [comment:  Marcell Shehwaro, STFU you idiot.  Shehwaro should be asking John Kerry when he's getting his goons out of Syria the capitalist terrorist bastard.  This US-Anglo Arab shill has got the nerve to seek 'serious action' as follow up to capitalist-sponsored goon attack on Syria, planned by Hillary Clinton since 2006.  Go f*ck yourselves, you disgusting assh*les. ]

“What is the end of it? What he can do that would be the end of it?”  [comment:  when John Kerry's bosses quit sending hired proxy goons to attack Syria, you fool.]

Mr. Kerry responded that “Assad’s indifference to anything” could push the administration to consider new options, adding, “There’s a different conversation taking place” since the intensified bombing of Aleppo and the further breakdown of talks with Russia.  [comment:  basically, C*cksucker Kerry is saying that if the Assad government does not capitulate to take-over by US-Anglo & Co. capitalist proxy goons attacking Syria, USA will escalate it's attack since 2006 on Syria.  The  $#^t. ]

But he also said any further American effort to arm rebels or join the fight could backfire.

“The problem is that, you know, you get, quote, enforcers in there and then everybody ups the ante, right? Russia puts in more, Iran puts in more; Hezbollah is there more and Nusra is more; and Saudi Arabia and Turkey put all their surrogate money in, and you all are destroyed.””

At another point, Mr. Kerry spelled out in stark terms distinctions the United States was making between combatants, which have upset the Syrian opposition: The United States wants the rebels to help it fight the Islamic State and Al Qaeda because, as he put it, “both have basically declared war on us.” But Washington will not join the same rebels in fighting Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite militia allied with Mr. Assad, even though the United States lists Hezbollah as a terrorist group like the others.  [comment:  USA lists anyone defending their own interests (and anyone exposing US capitalist criminality) as 'terrorist', so this means jack.  Hezbollah are the good guys then.  Why is US-Anglo capitalism turning on its Islamist partners?  ISIS and probably al-Qaeda are also US-Anglo capitalist proxies, I think.  Or at least Gulf Arab, which may as well be US-Anglo-Israelis, as they're on the same side.  In this declared war, if it's not a ruse, I think I'd back al-Qaeda and maybe even Islamic State for a round against the capitalists.  I don't want the capitalists to win.  If the Islamist guys would just stop doing all the atrocities and chill out about the religion (maybe go atheist and socialist), they would be easy to support against capitalism.  In their current state it is harder because they're dangerous.  But I still kind of sympathise with them when they declare war on the capitalists.  ]

“Hezbollah,” Mr. Kerry explained, “is not plotting against us.”  [comment:  the bet is that the US State Dept and Middle Eastern friends are plotting against Hezbollah.   Especially Israel.  Look out, Hezbollah.  ]

He also spoke of the obstacles he faces back home: a Congress unwilling to authorize the use of force and a public tired of war[COMMENT:  STAND BY FOR FALSE FLAGS AND MEDIA HYPE ABOUT THE DEAD ETC ... WHICH US-ANGLO CAPITALISM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING, AT THE END OF THE DAY.  EVERYBODY THAT HAS BEEN KILLED IN SYRIA HAS BEEN KILLED BY:  US-ANGLO-GULF-ARAB-ISRAELI BACKED ASSAULT ON THE ASSAD SYRIAN GOVERNMENT.   ]

“A lot of Americans don’t believe that we should be fighting and sending young Americans over to die in another country.”

One of the Syrians in the room assured Mr. Kerry, “No one is requesting an invasion,” but he insisted that the rebels needed more help.

As time ran short, Mr. Kerry told the Syrians that their best hope was a political solution to bring the opposition into a transitional government. Then, he said, “you can have an election and let the people of Syria decide: Who do they want?”  [comment:  No way.  Nuke them Kim Jong-un.  That's just bullsh*t.  Proxies of US-Anglo-Gulf-Arab-Israeli-Capitalism who attacked Syria should NEVER be rewarded in any way for engineering terror and destruction.  They should all be expelled immediately.  ]

A State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said later that Mr. Kerry was not indicating a shift in the administration’s view of Mr. Assad, only reiterating a longstanding belief that he would be ousted in any fair election [comment:  GTFOH & get the f*ck out of Syria, you capitalist bastards.  US Oligarchy can't even provide a fair election on its own corrupt turf, where its entire political system is nothing but a fraud of capitalist controlled faux 'democracy' and they're calling for 'fair elections' in the land of the Syrians.  Piss off, you bastards. ]

At one point, Mr. Kerry astonished the Syrians at the table when he suggested that they should participate in elections that include President Bashar al-Assad, five years after President Obama demanded that he step down.

Mr. Kerry described the election saying it would be set up by Western and regional powers, and the United Nations, “under the strictest standards.” He said that the millions of Syrians who have fled since the war began in 2011 would be able to participate.  [comment: that tells us that Syria's neighbours are bringing down Syria, along with Western capitalism and the stinking capitalist shill United Nations frauds.  The lot of them should be told to f*ck off.  They have no right to call elections in other people's nations.  GTFO. ]

“Everybody who’s registered as a refugee anywhere in the world can vote. Are they going to vote for Assad? Assad’s scared of this happening.”  [comment:  f*ck off, capitalist infidel.   LMAO ... EVERYBODY is registered as a 'Syrian refugee' all over the world (although the vast majority ARE FROM EVERY THIRD WORLD SH*THOLE ON THE PLANET but accepted as 'Syrian', because they've destroyed documents etc), because the WESTERN CAPITALIST DOGS DECLARED OPEN DOORS FOR 'SYRIAN REFUGEES'  - THIS MUST BE THE REASON THEY DID IT.  TO BRING DOWN ASSAD WITH THE FAKE ELECTION THING.  THE C*NTS.  ]

But the Syrians were skeptical that people living under government rule inside Syria would feel safe casting ballots against Mr. Assad, even with international observers — or that Russia would agree to elections if it could not ensure the outcome. And that is when the conversation reached an impasse, with Ms. Shehwaro, an educator and social media activist, recalling hopes for a more direct American role.  [comment:  that's their medical supplies sales shill.  What a f*cking joke this is.  This nobody is calling for this and that?  Yeah?  And so what?  Get the f*ck out of Syria, you bastards.  Capitalists are PIGS. ]

COMMENT:  WHAT NYT FAILS TO TELL ITS READERS

US-ANGLO CAPITALIST STATE PROPAGANDA & PUBLIC OPINION SHAPING STAGED BULLSH*T PLAYED OUT IN THE CAPITALIST OWNED LYING PROPAGANDA PRESS.

“So you think the only solution is for somebody to come in and get rid of Assad?” Mr. Kerry asked.

“Yes,” Ms. Shehwaro said.

“Who’s that going to be?” he asked. “Who’s going to do that?”


“Three years ago, I would say: You. But right now, I don’t know.”

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/john-kerry-syria-audio.html?_r=2



COMMENT



PROPAGANDA




The New York Times has been handballed that bullsh*t tape by the US State Dept. is my best bet.

This is a staged show, to basically set out the US-ANGLO-GULF-ARAB-ISRAELI-CAPITALIST fraudulent, public opinion shaping, various claims about a situation that they are RESPONSIBLE for engineering since 2006.

It is also there to either pressure Wall Street's boy Obama to act more forcefully in some way, or to give him the pretext to do so.  As Obama is controlled by capitalist masters, I would say it is more likely that this is an exercise in BUILDING PUBLIC CONSENT TO USE OF FORCE IN SYRIA BY U.S. ANGLO CAPITALISTS & THEIR FILTHY CAPITALIST ALLIES.

I'm so angry reading this.

United Shills and all these shilling 'human rights' NGOs sponsored by capitalism and used by the US State Dept and US-Anglo-Gulf-Arab-Israeli-Capitalism need to be told to f*ck right off.

 



P.S.  - US-Anglo capitalism thinks NGO and 'hooman rights' shilling pussy can sell anything, apparently.  Even force against Syria.  Pussy is probably supposed to be more 'persuasive' a presentation to the public (whose consent to yet another capitalist invasion and additional taxpayer burden is required), in the business of 'hooman rights' shilling and capitalist US State Dept. staged 'concern' for human rights, as PRETEXT for CAPITALIST AGGRESSION & WAR.

REMEMBER:  US-Anglo Capitalists & their Capitalist Friends HAD NO CONCERN FOR HUMAN RIGHTS WHEN THEY PLANNED TO SEND THEIR TERRORIST PROXIES TO ATTACK THE ASSAD SYRIAN GOVERNMENT.  

Just as they had no concern then, they have no concern whatsoever for 'hooman rights', now.

Stand by for that loathsome UN Hooman Rights Capitalist Saleswoman to put on a performance pitching for backing of capitalist assault on Syria.

 




P.S.  - I thought this was pretty funny.  Spell check does not recognise 'Obama' and is suggesting 'Osama'.






Blogger is putting in a ridiculous amount of 'spam' code automatically (associated with selecting 'courier' font), and it looks like there's something wrong with their programming. It's too much sh*t to have to wade through to do edits. Blogger tech needs to tweak something.

 


November 26, 2015

Hilarious Leaked Turkish False Flag Plot - Exposed Turkey (Plotting War), Cries - Leak Is 'Declaration of War' LMAO

Article
SOURCE - AUDIO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6pZ7AhR_C0



Published on 28 Mar 2014
SOURCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6pZ7AhR_C0
"
A leaked conversation between Turkey's intelligence chief and the war room reveals plot to create a casus belli for war with Syria by using ISIL, an alQaeda offshoot, to threaten a Turkish shrine Suleiman Shah Tomb.
Turkey has blocked youtube in order to cover up the leaks. Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed the recording of planning for a military incursion into Syria adding that a 'network of treason' was responsible for leak. Part two of the leaked conversation implicates John Kerry US secretary of state in the plot.

Syria has called on the United Nations to investigate a leaked file containing discussions by top Turkish authorities on how to fabricate an attack in order to justify a military operation against Damascus.

"I'd like to refer once again to this audio tape leak by the Turkish foreign minister and the deputy chief of staff of the Turkish army," Syrian Ambassador to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari said on Friday, adding that the Turkish officials talked about an attack by "sending a terrorist group inside the Syrian territory."

"And then this group is supposed to launch eight missiles within the Turkish territory and it would be a justification for further Turkish aggression against Syria," the Syrian envoy stated.

He also denounced some members of the UN Security Council and its secretariat for refusing to hear the truth about the situation in Syria, saying those countries themselves are "deeply involved" in "spreading terrorism" across the Arab country.

The audio file uploaded on YouTube is a recording of Turkey's intelligence chief Hakan Fidan, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Deputy Chief of Military  Staff Yasar Guler, and other senior officials discussing the possible assault.

Ankara reacted to the anonymous posting by blocking users' access to YouTube throughout Turkey, saying the leaking of the controversial recording had created "a national security issue."

Davutoglu also on Thursday condemned the leak as a "declaration of war" against the Turkish government and nation, stressing, "A cyber attack has been carried out against the Turkish Republic, our state and our valued nation."

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan earlier described the recording as "villainous".

The YouTube ban came a week after the government imposed a ban on Twitter, accusing the social networking website of violating Turkey's laws. 
"

SOURCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6pZ7AhR_C0

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

COMMENT

LMAO ... the only thing that's 'villainous' is Erdogan and his government.

This is hilarious.  They're pointing the finger & squealing that this leak is a 'declaration of war', but it's Turkey that was trying to declare war on Syria through dastardly, illegitimate, faked means!
OMG!  It says John Kerry, US Secretary of State, was also implicated.

Need to maybe confirm this elsewhere.  Wow, I didn't know about this.

Don't know how I missed this.  What was I looking at?





September 19, 2015

Video - Turkey - Migrant Mayhem

Video
SOURCE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55NhqUVEKY4




Turkey:

Blocking Passage to Greece

 




Published on 18 Sep 2015


"Clashes erupted when Turkish police decided to prevent refugees from marching any further towards the Greek border, Friday. 

Hundreds of refugees had started to march from their improvised camp on the outskirts of the border city of Edirne towards the Turkish-Greek border, earlier on Friday, with the police closely following them."


RT News



Dean Chapman comment, YouTube:  

"Created by the war machine"



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT


Yep.  And look at this mayhem, post Merkel's open house announcement.

It's just a drop in the ocean that's been making its way to Europe for years head of this German-encouraged surge.

The latest figure quoted has been 1 out of 5 Syrian.  

But I wouldn't be relying on anything Europe has to offer in the way of information.

There's absolutely no control of the situation.

Taking Europe would be a piece of cake for anyone so motivated from the southern flank, judging by European ineptitude in the face of migration.

Meanwhile, USA's John Kerry is calling for Assad to be removed. 

While the US has backed terrorists that are destroying Syria and surrounds, leaving Europe to foot the economic and social bill.




Assange
Transnational Security Elite,
Carving Up the World Using Your Tax Money
London 
OCT8 Antiwar Mass Assembly (2011)
Link  |  here






July 12, 2015

GIF - US Foreign Policy - Starring John Kerry & Geoffrey Pyatt




US Foreign Policy

Starring 

John Kerry
Geoffrey Pyatt
Co-Starring
Joe Biden 
John McCain




Scooby Doooooooo!!!!! 


Best Of Bubble Gum

Music-Flashback

Source:  YouTube

* Best played together *

[ incomplete - work in progress ]
 






March 14, 2015

VIDEO - Is US Secretary of State John Kerry a Lizard?










Is US Secretary of State John Kerry a Lizard?

Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KNn2yPBguyA










February 03, 2015

Power Drunk Hillary Clinton - Wreaked Destruction on the Middle East



JUSTIN RAIMONDO ARTICLE



Hillary’s War
The Pentagon tried to stop her – unfortunately, to no avail
by Justin Raimondo, February 02, 2015

What’s happening in Libya today is a crime: murder, rape, looting, chaos, a war of all against all. The perpetrator, the one key person who made all this possible, is a well known personage in American politics, a former Secretary of State and the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination.

What Hillary Clinton did to Libya is a crime on a scale rivaled only by the crimes of the Bush administration in Iraq – and there is a definite parallel in the methodology of the criminals.

Libya has been pretty much off the public’s radar screen ever since the US intervention that led to Muammar Qaddafi’s downfall – and the ugly aftermath in which the US ambassador was murdered by the very people Washington was intent on "liberating." Now the aftermath is getting even uglier.

The country is imploding, with two rival governments claiming suzerainty, but describing Libya’s situation as a state of "civil war" is a bit of an understatement. If ever there was such an entity as a "failed state" – that is, a state that has simply collapsed, and is dragging the rest of society down along with it – then Libya fits the definition to a tee. If we liken a society to the human body, then we can say Libya’s immune system is down, allowing a deadly infection to invade and take root – in this case, the "Islamic State," or "caliphate," known as ISIS, which first reared its head in Syria and is now spreading into Libya. [Suzerainty =  a power that controls the foreign affairs of a tributary vassal state, while allowing the subservient nation internal autonomy.]

Last week ISIS gunmen stormed Tripoli’s five-star Corinithia Hotel and opened fire at everyone in sight: ten people were killed, five of them foreigners, including one American. A communiqué from the "Tripoli province" of ISIS took responsibility for the attack, which they said was in retaliation for the death of captured Al Qaeda operative Abu Anas al-Liby, who died of liver cancer in a US hospital after being captured by US Special Forces.

Both Libya and Syria have been test cases in the experimental laboratory of America’s "regime-change" mad scientists – and both have given birth to Islamist Frankenstein monsters, turning on their creators with a vengeance.

But who created them? Who are the Dr. Frankensteins who brought these monsters to life?

The administration of George W. Bush lied us into war in Iraq, ignoring the warnings of war critics who presciently predicted the dissolution of the Iraqi state and the chaos we see there today. America’s alliance with "moderate" Sunni Islamists in Anbar province, credited with supposedly driving out Al Qaeda during the much-vaunted "surge," armed and trained the ISIS-led fanatics who have conquered that same region today. And yet while Team Bush can fairly be given some of the blame – by setting the general context of the disaster – the Obama administration is hardly innocent.

Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, took up a longstanding goal of the previous administration in pushing for a regime change campaign aimed at Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad: together with General David Petraeus, former CIA chief, she argued for arming the Syrian rebels, in concert with John Kerry and Republican allies like Sen. John McCain. This was part of a general strategy taken up during her tenure at Foggy Bottom, which sought to get ahead of the so-called Arab Spring and ally the US with "moderate" Islamists. The old secular-socialist despots, such as Assad and Libya’s Qaddafi, were finished, went the theory, and so the US should ally itself with this Wave of the Future so as not to be caught flatfooted by the rush of events.

In Libya, this meant backing a motley collection of Islamist radicals with, at most, a few degrees of separation from al-Qaeda. This move was championed by Secretary Clinton, along with national security advisor Susan Rice and Samantha Power, then Special Assistant to the President for Human Rights – but not without pushback from the Pentagon.

The generals didn’t want to get involved in what they viewed as a dubious adventure with unpredictable results. Who were these rebels we were supporting? The whole operation was "intelligence-lite," as a recent series of articles in the Washington Times puts it. The Times reports a full-scale Pentagon effort to avert US intervention:
"Top Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat in Congress so distrusted Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2011 march to war in Libya that they opened their own diplomatic channels with the Gadhafi regime in an effort to halt the escalating crisis, according to secret audio recordings recovered from Tripoli.

"The tapes, reviewed by The Washington Times and authenticated by the participants, chronicle U.S. officials’ unfiltered conversations with Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s son and a top Libyan leader, including criticisms that Mrs. Clinton had developed tunnel vision and led the U.S. into an unnecessary war without adequately weighing the intelligence community’s concerns."
Just as neoconservatives in key positions in the Bush administration manipulated the intelligence in order to shape the debate over the Iraq war, deceiving Congress and the American people, so the Hillaryites in the Obama administration did the same in the brief debate over the Libyan intervention

As the Times relates:
“‘You should see these internal State Department reports that are produced in the State Department that go out to the Congress. They’re just full of stupid, stupid facts,’ an American intermediary specifically dispatched by the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the Gadhafi regime in July 2011, saying the State Department was controlling what intelligence would be reported to U.S. officials."
Secretary Clinton, National Security Advisor Rice, and "humanitarian interventionist" Power argued that Qaddafi’s speech in which he called Libyan rebels "rats" toward whom he would show "no mercy" indicated a "genocide" was imminent in the eastern city of Benghazi. The media blindly accepted this assertion, as is their wont when it comes to government claims, but as the Times reports:

"[D]efense intelligence officials could not corroborate those concerns and in fact assessed that Gadhafi was unlikely to risk world outrage by inflicting mass casualties, officials told The Times. As a result, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, strongly opposed Mrs. Clinton’s recommendation to use force."

The generals feared they were being handed yet another foreign policy hot potato by the politicians, and in this they were indubitably correct: the Times says Hillary "repeatedly dismissed the warnings offered by career military and intelligence officials" – and prevented any of those warnings from reaching the President or members of Congress. Readers with long memories will recall similar suppressed (albeit leaked) warnings from dissident members of the intelligence community as George W. Bush and his neocon-controlled national security bureaucracy marched us to war in Iraq. The intelligence, they warned, was bogus; there were no "weapons of mass destruction," and the "evidence" for their existence was ginned up out of whole cloth.

Surreptitious recordings of a US agent on assignment for the Pentagon reveal the President referring to the Libyan adventure as "all Secretary Clinton’s matter" – in effect washing his hands of it. According to the tapes, the Pentagon’s man in Libya told a top Libyan official – who was trying to negotiate a peaceful end to the crisis – that Army Gen. Charles H. Jacoby, Jr., a top aide to Adm. Mullen, "does not trust the reports that are coming out of the State Department and CIA, but there’s nothing he can do about it." At one point, the Pentagon liaison tells his Libyan contacts "I can tell you that the President is not getting accurate information."

Sound familiar?

As in the case of the Iraq war, intelligence made public was cherry-picked in order to support a preordained conclusion, and the facts didn’t matter all that much anyway. The Times cites a senior Pentagon official who says: "The decision to invade [Libya] had already been made, so everything coming out of the State Department at that time was to reinforce that decision.” The paper also quotes a senior intelligence official familiar with the administration’s internal deliberations as saying: “Neither the intervention decision nor the regime change decision was an intelligence-heavy decision. People weren’t on the edge of their seats, intelligence wasn’t driving the decision one way or another."

Facts? Who needs them?

Hillary was determined to have her war, and not even the efforts by the Qaddafi family to effectively surrender were going to stop her:

"On the day the U.N. resolution was passed, Mrs. Clinton ordered a general within the Pentagon to refuse to take a call with Gadhafi’s son Seif and other high-level members within the regime, to help negotiate a resolution, the secret recordings reveal. A day later, on March 18, Gadhafi called for a cease-fire, another action the administration dismissed."
But the anti-interventionist generals in the Pentagon didn’t give up even then. The Times reveals that General Carter Ham, who headed up the US African Command (Africom), tried to negotiate a 72-hour ceasefire with the Libyan regime. The possibility presented itself through the person of retired Navy Rear Admiral Charles Kubic, who was a business representative in Libya: Kubic says he was approached by top Libyan officials who were ready to negotiate a truce. Kubic relayed the proposal to Lt. Col. Brian Linvill, who was Africom’s Libya specialist, who informed Gen. Ham. The Africom chief agreed it was a good idea. According to Kubic:
“The Libyans would stop all combat operations and withdraw all military forces to the outskirts of the cities and assume a defensive posture. Then to insure the credibility with the international community, the Libyans would accept recipients from the African Union to make sure the truce was honored.

“[Gadhafi] came back and said he was willing to step down and permit a transition government, but he had two conditions. First was to insure there was a military force left over after he left Libya capable to go after al Qaeda. Secondly, he wanted to have the sanctions against him and his family and those loyal to him lifted and free passage. At that point in time, everybody thought that was reasonable.”
The problem was that reasonableness had nothing to do with it: Obama having handed her the authority, Hillary was on her dry run as commander-in-chief and she wasn’t about to let the Pentagon stand in her way. She ordered Ham to "stand down two days after the negotiations began," reports the Times. Kubic says:
"If their goal was to get Gadhafi out of power, then why not give a 72-hour truce a try? It wasn’t enough to get him out of power; they wanted him dead."
They got what they wanted. They also got a failed state that has become a terrorist haven – and a dead US ambassador, along with several other Americans murdered in the same Benghazi attack. All under Secretary Clinton’s watch.

Against the available intelligence, which proffered no evidence of an "imminent genocide," Hillary took her cues from Donald Rumsfeld, whose infamous disquisition on "unknown unknowns" represented the merger of foreign policy and speculative fiction. Citing Rwanda and the early stages of the Balkan conflicts, Clinton averred that inaction would be the equivalent of standing by while a "humanitarian disaster" unfolded. Evidence to the contrary was therefore not admissible because, after all, it might happen.

Even as intelligence and military officials were warning that the aftermath of NATO’s Libyan campaign would be highly problematic, Secretary Clinton ignored them and instead pursued her politically-driven agenda – at a cost of thousands of lives, and a terrorist implantation in Libya.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) put it well:

"I think there was a rush headlong toward war in Libya and [the State Department and the administration] weren’t listening to anyone saying anything otherwise, including the Defense Department and intelligence communities, who were saying, ‘Hold on a minute. This may not be a good idea.’
"Hillary’s judgment has to be questioned. Her eagerness for war in Libya should preclude her from being considered the next commander in chief."

Amen, brother!

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/02/01/hillarys-war/

COMMENT


LOL ... thought this guy's spell-check had gone haywire.

Nope.  I just haven't come across the term 'suzerainty' before:
Suzerainty:   a power that controls the foreign affairs of a tributary vassal state, while allowing the subservient nation internal autonomy.
What I got out of this is that Hillary Clinton is a disgusting person and so is anyone associated with her, even if it's just for a book launch photo op.

It's just mind-blowing that peoples lives are destroyed and that entire regions are drawn into mayhem created by these power-drunk idiots.

..................................................................................
 
PS  The 'power drunk' conclusion is probably a bit too simplistic.  Hillary Clinton and other US political figures that banded together to cause the mayhem in Libya did so on behalf of whoever they really represent (ie their political donors and backers).


January 22, 2015

HIT SQUADS, MUTINY, LOBBY-TOYS, A DEAD POPE, MORAL OUTRAGE -- WHAT 'FREE PRESS'? -- AND MOSSAD

HIT SQUADS, MUTINY, LOBBY-TOYS, A DEAD POPE, MORAL OUTRAGE -- WHAT 'FREE PRESS'? -- AND MOSSAD

Started my browsing adventures off with looking for evidence of Iranian hit squads, cos I'm on a half-hearted mission to figure out who's knocked off Argentina's prosecutor, Alberto Nisman.

Yet to find Iranian hit squads ... but I've been distracted by this find:  a hilarious 2011 article on Libyan & Iranian 'Greatest Hit Squads' in America:


By Mark Ames
If you’re feeling like you’re being taken for a ride with all this nonsense about Iranian-Narco-Mexican terror hit-squads infiltrating this great nation, read on…

Think this is the guy who's written about American support for Chechen extremists.
Yeah, checked and confirmed it's the same guy that wrote the Chechen article I liked.  Posted in relation to it here.  Remember also liking the humour that came across.

Anyway, as I get distracted easily, the very next thing, I'm getting blown away by the news that John Boehner and Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer have teed up a Benjamin Netanyahu Congress speech on February 11th, having cut out the main man, Obama, and having seemingly rigged up a scandalous (and mutinous?) scenario, where Bibi gives a speech rebutting US foreign policy.
Behind Obama's back: How Netanyahu's US trip was cooked up << Boehner initiated >>  http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.638396

> departure from protocol - Israel ambassador Ron Dermer & speaker John Boehner cook-up
> Prevent Iran nuclear weapons shared goal

John Boehner’s Bibi invite sets up showdown with White House >>>
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/john-boehner-invites-benjamin-netanyahu-congress-iran-114439.html

<<< "Republicans & Democrats in the Capitol seem more closely aligned with Netanyahu than with Obama" >>>

Bibi’s Congress speech Feb 11 = foreign leader, blocks from WH (invitation of Congress) to rebut the US foreign policy!!

Boehner: "serious threat that exists" "serious conversation" "how serious the threat is" >> Going with 'serious threat', eh?

The news seemed massive to me and I got super excited ... but nobody else seems as excited as I was.
Just checked to see if it was reported elsewhere and found that The Guardian has also reported on Boehner's moves, rather coolly:

John Boehner invites Netanyahu to address Congress on Iran next month  

However, that's a rather mild take on what seems to be going on, when you consider that the authority of the President of the United States is being challenged here by some lobby-toy politican, Boehner.
The Guardian continues:
Invitation, provocative move by House speaker, came hours after Obama threatened during State of the Union address to veto any Iran sanctions bill
'Threatened'?  Sounds a rather extreme way to describe what is a statement of Presidential intent made during the President's SOTU address, and presumably within the President's authority.

An odd way to convey what seems to be the other way around:  Congress threatening to pass a sanctions bill that the President considers counter-productive to furthering negotiations with Iran, who may well choose to walk, rather than negotiate, at the end of the day.

As for 'provocative move', I'd have called it an underhand, backstabbing, embarrassing mutiny.  So what gives?

The White House, meanwhile, is downplaying this by calling it a "break of normal diplomatic protocol".  Yeah, I'll say.  If this was happening in Russia, can you imagine the screaming headlines?

Anyway, I wanted to know a bit more about Boehner and I found this fantastic Rolling Stone article:

The Crying Shame of John Boehner

He's a lazy, double-talking shill for corporate interests. So how's he going to fare with the Tea Party?

written by Matt Taibbi, who turns out to be another really clever and funny guy, who's co-edited The eXile with Mark Ames (of the 'Greatest Hit Squads' article fame, above).

Not only that, turns out Taibbi's written a piece that was denounced by US politicians and talking heads:
"The 52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death of the Pope"

At first I was like, dude, this is a bit sick ... but then I got reading and saw the humour in it.

Personal favourites:
28. Bears everywhere shitting in woods.
 8. Bush continued: "He touched all of us in places no one else could reach."

Sure, it may not be to everybody's taste, but so what?

This is the condemnation bandwagon list:
Hillary Clinton (US lawyer, politician)
Michael Bloomberg (businessman, magnate, mayor of NYC)
Matt Drudge (political commentator, creator of news aggregate site Drudge Report)
Abe Foxman (Soviet-born, US lawyer, national director of Anti-Defamation League)
Anthony Weiner (New York politician, House of Reps, sexting scandal)
Perhaps others also complained, but from the above list of denouncers (referred to in Wikipedia), there's not a single Catholic among those that took umbrage, so what's the real agenda?
In addition to a pious whinge-fest, "the editor who approved the column was fired".
A look-up elsewhere indicates that the New York Press editor, Jeff Koyen, was given two weeks unpaid leave but chose to quit, and:
Koyen called his former publisher "a spineless alt-weekly weenie" for not standing up to the harsh criticisms the article received. Criticisms came from a variety of people such as U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton, a spokesman for New York City Mayor Bloomberg and former Mayor Rudolph Guliani.

Koyen also reacted to statements made by Rep. Anthony Weiner who was quoted by the New York Daily News calling on New Yorkers to "exercise their right to take as many of these rags as they can and put them in the trash."

Interrupting the distribution of a newspaper -- even by purchasing a large quantity of them and throwing them out -- is illegal, koyen noted
Ooh, look, finally a (thrice-married) Catholic among the condemning mob, the toothy Guliani, who caused some controversy by supporting:
People's Mujahedin of Iran (MEK, also PMOI, MKO), from the United States State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. The group was on the State Department list from 1997 until September 2012. They were placed on the list for killing six Americans in Iran during the 1970s and attempting to attack the Iranian mission to the United Nations in 1992. [Wikipedia]
Cool, Iranian assassins is what I was originally looking for!

Uncertain why a bit of satire caused such political outrage at the time (guessing nearing April 2005).

There was four different incidents of US gun violence leading up to that time and 22 people were killed within a short amount of time, but I guess 22 people among a population of over 300 million doesn't upset things as much as it might in a smaller population. Well, not enough to challenge the armaments manufacturers and the gun lobby. 

During 2005, USA was 2 years into the Iraq invasion and had been in Afghanistan since 2001.

The other thing happening at that time was the final stages of the Terri Schiavo drama being played out.  Basically, heart attack and severe brain damage in 1990; kept on artificial supports until 2005, when feeding tubes were finally removed.  What is horrific is the amount of time this person had to linger in a vegetative state, as well as the amount of time (13 days, I think it was) it then took to die after removal of feeding tubes.  It's like something out of a horror story.

It's really doing my head in that something like that can happen to a person and that medical people are not permitted to step in to do the right thing and euthanase the vegetative person, who will exist (if supported) in a vegetative state (which nobody could possibly want as an existence) or otherwise die ... slowly.

Anyway, there seems to be some interesting reflections of the past in the present.

Currently there's a satire and freedom of press related hysteria that's done an outraged wave around the world (but not as much outrage at the barbaric slaughter of people who have a right to live, to express themselves politically or otherwise, and to work without the threat of violence or death). 
The current touring Pope has tried to declare religion as off-limits (self-serving, or what?) and virtually justified the violence along the lines that it could be expected, given his rather stupid insult-my-mother analogy.  The mommy insult analogy makes it sound like some playground bit of bullying between children (unless his Holiness thinks it's fine for adults to go around assaulting or murdering one another because they don't like what's said). 
Automatic weapons and a rocket launcher aren't a bit of school-yard 'you-said, so I'm getting even' bullying.  Why trivialise something so ugly and uncivilised that we should all despair for the future on this planet? 

Opportunistic politicians and others have also tried to deny the right and merit of free speech, effectively blaming the victims of extremist violence.  A number of figures have also  tried to use this atrocity to further state control agendas of (a) suppression of free speech and (b) expansion of state controls, such as mass surveillance and denial of encryption services etc.

Getting back to the Netanyahu and US Congress drama, a Bloomberg article indicates that Mossad has broken ranks with the Israeli PM, telling US officials that new Iran sanctions would 'tank' the nukes negotiations.

Israeli Mossad Goes Rogue, Warns U.S. on Iran Sanctions

Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee  -- supported by Republican Senators Lindsay Graham and John McCain -- is pushing for his own legislation on the Iran nuclear deal, which doesn't contain sanctions but would require that the Senate vote on any pact that is agreed upon in Geneva. The White House is opposed to both the Kirk-Menendez bill and the Corker bill; it doesn't want Congress to meddle at all in the delicate multilateral diplomacy with Iran.

Israeli intelligence officials have been briefing both Obama administration officials and visiting U.S. senators about their concerns on the Kirk-Menendez bill, which would increase sanctions on Iran only if the Iranian government can't strike a deal with the so-called P5+1 countries by a June 30 deadline or fails to live up to its commitments. Meanwhile, the Israeli prime minister’s office has been supporting the Kirk-Menendez bill, as does the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, ahead of what will be a major foreign policy confrontation between the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government in coming weeks.


Evidence of the Israeli rift surfaced Wednesday when Secretary of State John Kerry said that an unnamed Israeli intelligence official had said the new sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade into the process.” But an initial warning from Israeli Mossad leaders was also delivered last week in Israel to a Congressional delegation -- including Corker, Graham, McCain and fellow Republican John Barrasso; Democratic Senators Joe Donnelly and Tim Kaine; and independent Angus King -- according to lawmakers who were present and staff members who were briefed on the exchange. When Menendez (who was not on the trip) heard about the briefing, he quickly phoned Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Ron Dermer to seek clarification.
OK, what's going on here?  How is who Israeli intelligence (or Israeli politicians) favour in the USA sphere of national sovereignty even relevant, and why are these American politicians -- who are answerable to the American voters -- even in Israel on a 'congressional delegation'? 

Don't know why Obama doesn't just step down so Netanyahu can take his rightful place at the helm of US politics, if Israel is pulling that many strings in the US through its intelligence services addressing a visiting congressional delegation, as well as addressing politicians in the US, while Israel's Foreign Minister is making arrangements directly with Boehner (rather than Obama), and even the pro-Israel lobby group, AIPAC, happens to be playing some role in the decision-making process in the US, by the look of things.
American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC
Annual budget $67 million @ 2010
America's powerful Pro-Israel Lobby

Critics have accused AIPAC of acting as agent of Israeli govt, with a "stranglehold" on the US Congress. [Wikipedia]
All of this congress squabbling, and appearance of rogue senators and rogue Mossad, sounds like crap to me.  We wouldn't be privy to any of this if the politicians didn't want us to know about it.

I'm going to take a guess and say this is some kind of smokescreen for something.  But I'm not sure what, seeing the final decision can only go as follows: 
1) either the US goes with sanctions against Iran or it doesn't. 
2) either the Senate gets to vote on the results of any Geneva agreement with Iran or it doesn't.
Well, that's that. 
But I still don't know what the Iranians get up to, I'm no closer to finding out who killed Alberto Nisman and no wiser about the sport of US Congress.