TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benghazi. Show all posts

October 05, 2016

Gaddafi's 2011 Prophesy: "Europe Will Turn Black" (Video)





ministry of tokyo






"Europe Will Turn Black"
2011 Gaddafi Prophesy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLflLdIJeMw 

US Ambassador
Thumbs-Up Gaddafi Corpse


GADDAFI & FRIENDS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxzDme7tq20
US Ambassador
Thumbs-Up Gaddafi Corpse










US Consulate, Benghazi 2012
 


US Media 'Justice' Spin 2012
Bitch of Benghazi
HILLARY CLINTON

JULIAN ASSANGE
WIKILEAKS
WAR BY MEDIA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLflLdIJeMw



DOCUMENTARY
TRANSCRIPT
[For Quotes, Confirm Audio]


SOURCE MATERIAL
Russian Documentary Video Clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLflLdIJeMw

Muammar Gaddafi:

Now you people in NATO, listen to me.

You are bombing the wall that stopped African migration into Europe.

This wall stopped the terrorists from al-Qaeda. This wall was Libya.

You are destroying it, you fools.

For the many thousands of migrants from Africa, for your support of al-Qaeda, you will burn in hell. This is how it will be.

Narrator:

Until 1968, Libya was a monarchy.

Seventy percent (70%) of the population lived below the poverty line.

Many were illiterate and lived in simple nomadic tents.

It was a typically underdeveloped African country.

Gaddafi provided the Libyans with the kind of life that made the rest of the dark continent envious.

Out of the desert arose the 'Eight Wonder of the World' - the Great Man-Made River (the world's largest irrigation project).

Interview Subject (Male) c. 0:50:

He was able to create a system of irrigation throughout the desert, through an underground pipe network.

Interview Subject (Female) c. 0:57:

Factories and enterprises began operating throughout Libya, none of which were there before.

Narrator:

Not having paid a single Dinar, Libyans moved from tents into apartment blocks.

'Rent' did not exist. Everything, including utilities and power, was covered by the government.

Interview Subject (Male, elderly) c. 1:17:

If we were to compare the way cities, such as Tripoli, looked before he came to power and after, you would see that it went from an ugly village to a city with high-rises, 30 years later.

So you want to get married?

The government would give newly-wed couples USD$64,000 towards buying a home and USD$7,000 towards each child born.

You want a car?

The government will cover 50% of the cost.

Petrol in Libya used to be cheaper than water: 3 cents per litre.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 17:03:

Minimum wages were in the thousands of dollars, education abroad was paid for by the state, and cases where medical surgeries needed to be carried out outside of Libya, the state covered that, too.

Narrator:

"But to bring lasting peace of Libya would be impossible: this land will forever be torn apart by the leaders of these various tribes."

"They can't and don't want to be ruled by a single person."

That's what the leaders of the superpowers said in the 1970s

Colonel Gaddafi surprised everyone.

He unified 140 tribes into one country.

Each one of these tribes had their own leader (Sheik).

The option for Gadddafi was to either "scare them to death" or to buy them.

Gaddafi preferred the latter.

He promised them a heavenly existence, and he delivered on his words.


Cuts to Gaddafi:

We have oil: this is what will unite us.


Narrator:

Oil is the reason that Libya stayed as one country.

Gaddafi nationalised the oil producing industry.

He promised that the huge profits would be fairly distributed across the entire country.

All Libyans began to receive their share of Libyan oil trade.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 3:07:

When the people can see that a certain leader is raising the standard of living, of course he will have a lot of support.

Narrator:

Gaddafi kicked out the foreigners.

He closed the US and British military bases.

He confiscated property from local Italians, the offspring of the colonisers.

Then he moved onto the culture.

He changed the calender, including the names of the months, and counting the years now from the birth of the Prophet Mohammed.

He reviewed all the laws in Libya, to be in accordance with Sharia Law.

Alcohol and gambling became illegal.

Gaddafi considered himself to principal fighter for the interests of his people.

Placing hand-picked personnel amidst high ranking roles, and being in full control of the country, Gaddafi refused any kind of title for himself.

Having consolidated immense power, he only ever referred to himself as the 'servant of the people'.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 4:08:

"I'm just your 'brother of a leader', or a "brother of a ruler" - or sometimes he would title himself anything at all.

Narrator:

He considered Islam to be the highest form of moral authority; he did not drink any alcohol, which is forbidden by the Koran.

He didn't even drink tea or coffee and kept his food very simple.

But Libya was only getting richer.

The huge oil revenues allowed Gaddafi to have Napoleonic plans.


He stated that the Gulf of Sidra, in the Mediterranean Sea, is Libya's territorial waters, and vowed to take out any ship or aircraft that trespass "the line of death".

Ronald Reagan called him the "wild dog of the Middle East" and he ordered the bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi.




America’s Planned Nuclear Attack on Libya
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Global Research, March 30, 2011
30 March 2011
http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-s-planned-nuclear-attack-on-libya/24049?print=1


"... planned attack on Libya using nuclear weapons, had been contemplated by the Clinton Administration in 1996, at the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal"


The US military operation El Dorado Canyon (1986) lasted 11 minutes.

Around 100 aircraft dropped 150 tonnes of bombs over Libya.

It's target was Gaddafi's residence and military bases, but many innocent Libyans perished.

The little country, where people were sleepy
[from too much eating (Russian reference, likely to docile Libyans due to prosperity)]
was shocked.

Gaddafi survived. Killing him would prove more challenging.

Russian news announcement [potentially] / male voice (c. 5:31):

"Americans failed in their mission" said Mikhail Gorbachev, in a message to Muammar Gaddafi.

Narrator:

The Colonel quickly understood that Western media will never write about the positive aspects of his country: the building of infrastructure and roads, the growing birth rate, and free medical care.

Journalists like a show and he continually tried to grab their attention for interesting publications.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 5:56:

He became more and more creative.

He did strange things, and worse some interesting clothing, accompanied by battalions of security.

Narrator:

His whole life, he wrote philosophy, in what he termed his 'green book'.

Essential, he wrote a bible for the Libyan people in which he said that neither Communism nor Capitalism was suited to Libya.

"Communism is a rejection of God, and Capitalism is a rejection of the human." There must be a third option.

Interview Subject (Male, elderly) c. 6:30:

"Democracy is a sham. Representation is a sham. Political parties are a sham. Parliament is a sham.

He considered that democracy is only an illusion of "the rule by the people." Simply an illusion.

So he introduced the model of the Soviet Union - the 'soviet' [council] is where the power is."

Narrator:

In 1992, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions against Libya.

Libya's ability to sell oil ceased, and assets were frozen.

How to win back the business of the international community? Gaddafi would consider it for 10 years.

He decided to buy it.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 7:10:

I met with him in 2007 or 2008, during the world financial crisis, and I remember the last thing he said to me.

He said "I only made one mistake, and that was trusting the Americans and the Westerners."

Narrator:

Condoleezza Rice, Tony Blair, and Nicolas Sarkozy convinced Gaddafi to wrap up all his military programs in return for their loyalty [to buying oil].

They said: give up your [military] programs, and you will become a full member of the 'international community'.

Having been ostracised for so long, Gaddafi agreed.

In 2013, Sadam Hussien was tried [by kangaroo court and executed], demonstrating to Gaddafi, once again, that it is best not to be on bad terms with the West.

Interview Subject (Male) c. 7:58:

In 2010, he was hugging Obama and calling him his closest ally and friend; he loaned Sarkozy money.

Narrator:

Sarkozy approached the Libyan government when he was a Minsister of Internal Affairs.

He needed money for his election campaign.

It was Libya's money that helped Sarkozy become President.

`
Interview Subject (Male) c. 8:18:

Gaddafi gave Sarkozy a lot of money, both to the cause and in his own pocket.

And not just to Sarkozy, but other EU leaders such as Berlusconi.

He paid Germany and Britain, too.

Narrator:

Gaddafi devoted himself to the intrigues on the international arena, but within his own country he feared no one.

He knew that his people loved him, and it was true - they continued to show love for him, but it only added to his supposition of being irreplaceable.

Cuts to vieled elderly female:

"I am ready to put down my life for Muammar Gaddafi: he is a symbol of emancipation from the colonisers for every Libyan!"

Interview Subject (Male) c. 8:56:

Meanwhile, the tribes began to segregate, living their own ways and traditions.

Even though Gaddafi continued to feed them, clothe them and arm them, and they appeared to be loyal to him, that loyalty wore thin.

Narrator:

In December 2010, the entire region became engulfed by protests and demonstrators.

People became tired of poverty, the rife corruption that was taking place amongst officials, as well as lawlessness and hopelessness of their countries.

The 'Arab Spring' had arrived, complete with chaos, and flowing rivers of blood.

Opposition rebels got control of Eastern Libya in a number of days. Gaddafi was in Western Libya at the time.

He was assured that he could dispel the uprising.

Gaddafi audio:

"Prepare to defend Libya! They wanted a war; they will have a war!"

Narrator:

We are close to victory, but to speed it along, I'm ready to open up the military arsenals and private all of Libya's true patriots with weapons!"

At first, Gaddafi said they are just groups of drug addicts who are attacking police officers and stealing their weapons.

But he quickly realised, this smells like a government coup.

And there is nobody to defend him: he himself had vastly reduced his armed forces.

Interview Subject (Male elderly) c. 10:14:

The first one to act was Sarkozy: he unleashed the French airforce.

Narrator:

After the fall of Tripoli, Gaddafi remained in control of only 2 cities, around which brutal battles waged.

There were more and more casualties.

Interview Subject (Female) c. 10:30:

The West, of course, tricked Gaddafi.

He never expected this. It was a real knife in the back situation.

It isn't even clear why they did this - why was this war necessary?

Muammar Gaddafi was himself doing everything that they asked for.

They killed him in a very humiliating way; as a personality, as a man, as a soldier, as a ruler, as a leader.

Interview Subject (Female, floral dress) c. 10:59:

This version of events will never be relayed in Western media, because it is obviously embarrassing to the dignity of their own countries.

They maintain that Libyans did this to Gaddafi because they are savage, unenlightened beings.

Narrator:

Never has the death of a human being caused such over-abundance of Joy.

Thousands of people rejoiced, who once loved Gaddafi.

Hillary Clinton said "Woooow" when she heard the news.

The US Ambassador to Libya took a picture next to the dictator's body, with his thumbs up.


Interview Subject (Male) c. 11:41:

Libya got rid of Gaddafi and Gaddafi's family. The got rid of 'the green book' and the green flag.

They gained the absence of a unitary state, no governance structures, a permanent civil war and basically everything that the average 'revolutionary' never imagined.

12:13 -

Very disturbing footage of bloodied Gaddafi surrounded by rabble, gunfire, screaming, poor audio, photographs being taken of bloodied and confused Gaddafi on what appears to be back of truck; disturbing high pitched noise like ongoing screaming and gunshots fired, possibly from automatic weapons.


Vladimir Putin [13:05]:

And my final comment, Mr McCain, as is known, is a Vietnam veteran.

I would assume his hands are elbow deep in civilian blood.

It appears he just cannot get by without repeated scenese that are atrocious to us, of the murder of Gaddafi.

On TV screens around the world, we were shown his murder, where he was drenched in blood.

Is this what you call democracy?

How did they do it?

Using drones, they delivered a blow to his battalion, and then over the radio to special forces - which shouldn't have been on the territory - they brought in a camera crew, as well as opposition rebels.

And they murdered him without a trace or trial.

If he was captured, it should have been left up to the people to decide his fate via democratic methods.

Yes, it's difficult and it takes time, but nothing else is acceptable.

RT News Interview (Male) c. 13:59
Bill Dod:

"Colonel Gaddafi told Tony Blair that Jihadists would control the Mediterranean and attack Europe if his regime was allowed to collapse. The warning was revealed in released transcripts of telephone conversations between the two leaders from February 2011"

Transcript:

There are ARMED GANGS who have weapons.

Not decided to face them with force, asking their families to convince them to lay down arms.

You can't reason with them.

They keep saying things like Mohammed is the prophet. Similar to bin Laden.
They are paving the way for him in North Africa.

They want to control the Mediterranean and then they will attack Europe.

Need to explain to the 'international community'.

Gaddafi's prediction was made in two desperate telephone calls with Blair as the civil war was engulfing Libya.

Three weeks later, a NATO-led coalition that included Britain, began bombing raids that led to the overthrow and eventual killing of Gaddafi. ISIL now controls large parts of Libya.


Vladimir Putin [15:01]:
Putin on Libya
Valdai Discussion Club 2014

Look at Libya and what you did there, that got your Ambassador murdered.

Was it us that did this?

You even had a Security Council decision for this; to establish a no-fly zone.

What for?

it was so that Gaddafi's airforce couldn't fly over and bomb the rebels.

This wasn't the smartest decision.

But, OK ...

What did you proceed to do yourselves?

You started bombing the territory.

This is in clear contravention of the Security Council resolution.

It is even outright aggression over a state.

Was it us that did this?

You did this with your bare hands.

And it ended with the murder of your Ambassador.

Whose fault is it? It's your fault.

Is it a good result that your Ambassador was murdered?

It is actually a terrible catastrophe.

But do not look around for somebody to blame, when it is you making these mistakes.

You must do the opposite; rise above the endless desire to dominate.

You must stop acting out of imperialist ambitions.

Do not poison the consciousness of millions of people; that there can be no other way but imperialistic politics.


--- COMMENT ---


Зачем? Zachem?

'what for?'

(sounds like 'Ch'om) / possibly the contracted version?



COMMENT


That was a very good documentary.

I didn't know that the US Ambassador that was eventually killed in Benghazi had been photographed with a thumbs-up over Gaddafi's mutilated corpse.

What the capitalists have done to Libya is shocking.

Lessons here:

1.  Do not trust capitalists.
2.  Do not disarm or wind down military.
3.  Rule by fear and brutal force may work better than generosity.

What kind of fools receive everything they need for nothing and then take down the government that provides them with freebies that are unheard of anywhere else, to destroy their country and install rule by foreign capitalism that will mercilessly exploit Libya and the Libyan people?

I can't believe it.

Next time a Jihadi ploughs into a French crowd, I'll be thinking it is the French capitalists that are driving the bus.

What the capitalists of Europe, Britain and the US are doing abroad is disgusting.

What is even more shocking and astounding to me is that they simultaneously destroy all European societies and nobody objects.




March 28, 2016

CENSORSHIP - Hillary Clinton E-mails - Hiding Western Colonialism, War Crimes, Tech & Media Collaboration



CENSORSHIP
Hillary Clinton E-mails
Hiding
Western Colonialism
 War Crimes
Tech & Media Collaboration

CENSORED
HILLARY CLINTON E-MAILS

-------/\/\/
LIBYA

UK & France Got Libyan Oil
for Supporting Gaddafi Ousting

Colonialism in Action
France and Britain expect favourable contracts to French & British energy companies muscling in on Libyan oil industry.

-------/\/\/

SYRIA

Tech & Media Prostitutes
 in Bed With 
US Government
Commission
of
War Crimes

GOOGLE
& Al-Jazeera
Al Jazeera
state-funded broadcaster
owned by the Al Jazeera Media Network
partly funded by the House of Thani
ruling family of Qatar

HELPED
Destabilise Syria

-------/\/\/

Planned in Advance
since at least 2006
Overthrow of Syria's Bashar al-Assad
means Israeli domination

Sectarian war on fall of Assad
BONUS
for Israel & its allies

-------/\/\/

Goolge & YouTube
Google blocked

Benghazi Video 2012

Facebook
does not want you to know about the
Hillary Clinton e-mails

INSPECT:

FACEBOOK CENSORING

WikiLeaks
Hillary Clinton e-mail
RELEASE

-------/\/\/

American & Allied
AGGRESSION!
& American Social Media
CENSORSHIP!

source:  @INTHENOWRT

_____________________________
WATCH VIDEO
VIA



---------------------- ----------------------




December 08, 2015

Libya - Benghazi Assault & Murder & Mumbi Attack

Article
SOURCE
as marked



Article

Title:  "Ambassador Stevens Was Raped Before His Murder, Reports Claim"
Author:  Wolff Bachner
re:  Ambassador to Libya -- J. Christopher Stevens
Other:

EXTRACT - Mumbai Attack

"Pakistani Muslim terrorists attacked the Chabad Jewish center during the devastating terror attacks in Mumbai, India, Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, were both tortured and raped, and their bodies were desecrated.  According to the Mumbai Police, the Rabbi was castrated while still alive. “Even the Rabbi and his wife at Nariman House were sexually assaulted and their genitalia mutilated,” said a senior officer of the investigating team."
http://www.inquisitr.com/330504/ambassador-stevens-was-raped-before-his-murder-reports-claim/
Note:  the woman victim was 6 months pregnant [source:  DailyMail - here]



Article
Benghazi: Obama's Actions Amount To A Shameful Dereliction Of Duty
Peter Ferrara
Oct 25, 2012 @ 09:19 AM


"...  Benghazi murders of Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 others, including two Marines ..."

"The Obama Administration received requests for additional security from the Embassy and the Ambassador himself as early as February.  An embassy cable on June 25 expressed fear of rising Islamic extremism in eastern Libya around Benghazi, and noted that the black flag of Al-Qaeda “has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities.”

"On August 2, Ambassador Stevens sent a cable requesting 11 additional body guards, noting “Host nation security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment for the diplomatic mission of outreach.”

"But these requests for additional security were repeatedly denied ..."

"Obama and his allies did not want a show of American force in the country that would offend Muslim sensibilities.  They wanted to rely instead on the host country’s security that the embassy was telling them was inadequate and could not be depended upon."

"... the day of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, September 11, the White House situation room starts receiving emails at about 1 pm that the mission is under hostile surveillance.  The only response was that the Pentagon sends a drone armed with a video camera so that everyone in Washington can see what transpires in real time, as it happens, at the White House, at the State Department, at the Pentagon, at the CIA."

"The drone documents no crowds protesting any video.  But at 4 pm Washington receives an email from the Benghazi mission that it is under military style attack."

"The attack was then fed to all of them, the White House, the Pentagon, the State Dept., the CIA, through live video feed.  A later email that day reported, “Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”  The feed showed no protest of any supposedly offensive You Tube video."

"Just one hour flight time away were U.S. Air Force bases that could have been rousted in minutes to send fighter planes and attack helicopters that could have routed the attackers in minutes of fighting."

Obama & Hillary Clinton:

"...  likely knew [correction: they surely knew] the attack on our Benghazi consulate the day before was organized by terrorists.  They knew because they were privy to a flurry of emails among administration officials discussing the attack in real time.  Yet they said nothing about what they knew and, worse, had done nothing to mount a rescue despite American forces being less than an hour away during the seven hour blitz."

" The United States Ambassador to Libya, the personal representative of President Barack Obama, had been tortured, sodomized, dragged bloody through the streets of Benghazi, and murdered Chris Stevens, along with the two Marines and another who were murdered along with him, had volunteered to serve his country.  But under the leadership of Barack Obama, that is how his service ended."

"The Truth-Challenged President

But the saga did not end there for the American people.  The rest of us had to endure the President, Secretary of State Clinton, and UN Ambassador “explaining” to us that what really happened was that those irascible Muslims were all incited out of their minds by a previously unseen, unheard of You Tube video trailer by an unknown American immigrant, a movie that was never made outside the trailer advertising it, in Fool on the Hill style.  Their protest had just got out of hand, you see.

Except they all knew when they were saying these very words that they were untrue.  They were precisely calculated to deceive and to mislead.  Yet there was our President Obama telling this mendacious fairy tale to the entire world at the U.N.  And there was U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice telling the American people the same concocted fairy tale.  Typical Progressives, they were so certain that they could easily buffalo a majority of their countrymen, no smarter than the representative Homer Simpson."



---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
COMMENT

A photo of a guy I suspected had been tortured was going around, but I wasn't sure that's what I was looking at, and I didn't know who it was.

It was only after the photo was passed around with a message that it was the US Ambassador being tortured, that it did really look like it was a torture victim.  It also looked like someone may have been holding a cattle prod or something like that (which I didn't spot on initial viewing, when I wasn't entirely sure what I was looking at).
Once I had an idea of who it might be, I Googled for information.
Some site on the internet denies it was him, but when I keyed in about torture the Forbes article and others came up.

I wasn't aware that the people in the Mumbai attacks were sexually assaulted and tortured (that's come just by chance within one of the Benghazi articles).

I also wasn't aware that the US Ambassador was sexually assaulted and tortured, and  I think I'd remember having seen something about this in the (admittedly few) Benghazi articles I may have looked at. 

I'm shocked and sort of freaked out by that.  It's very disturbing.   Probably moreso because I'd spent some of today looking at Islamic history and getting into listening to associated music.

Islamic history isn't as appealing after reading these couple of articles. 
I still feel sick.  It's a numb and sick feeling, but I'm not sure why I find it as disturbing as I do.  I think it might be the sexual assault savagery combined with torture savagery and helplessness of the victims that does my head in.  It's both disgusting and incomprehensibly cruel.

It's unbelievable that they denied the embassy additional security, when more security was sought.  And it's beyond comprehension that they watched this man get tortured and dragged around Benghazi without doing anything to help.

This was in 2012, so they'd already taken down Gaddafi in 2011 and Libya was presumably in a state of civil war.

Why would you even have an embassy in the country under those circumstances?

Regarding both stories, Daily Mail has left out the gruesome parts, although I think the public ought to know exactly what's happened.   I know I'd rather know, even if it is horrible and disturbing.

November 27, 2015

Syria Under Attack - the Great Satan & the Little Imp, Turkey - Plus their al-Qaeda Proxies - Mayhem in the Middle East

Article
SOURCE

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html




New exposé by Seymour Hersh: Turkey staged gas attack to provoke US war on Syria

By Patrick Martin
7 April 2014
In a lengthy article published Sunday by the London Review of Books, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reports that the sarin gas attack on a Damascus suburb on August 21, 2013 was actually carried out by Syrian “rebel” forces acting at the behest of Turkey, for the purpose of providing a pretext for a US attack on Syria.

The gas attack killed many hundreds of people in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, and the Obama administration and the corporate-controlled US media immediately blamed the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad for the atrocity. The New York Times, in particular, published a lengthy analysis by its military “expert,” C. J. Chivers, which purported to show, based on rocket trajectories, prevailing winds and other technical factors, that the gas shells could only have been fired from Syrian army artillery positions.

For several weeks, the Ghouta attack became the pretext for a warmongering campaign by the White House and the US and European media. Obama threatened immediate air strikes, claiming that the Syrian government had crossed a “red line” against the use of chemical weapons, which he had laid down in 2012.

The US president then abruptly reversed himself and announced he would seek congressional approval first, only to call off any overt military action in favor of a deal brokered by Russian President Vladimir Putin in which Assad agreed to the supervised dismantling of his chemical weapons stockpiles.
By Hersh’s account, “Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal. The message that the case against Syria wouldn’t hold up was quickly relayed to the US joint chiefs of staff… As a consequence the American officers delivered a last-minute caution to the president, which, in their view, eventually led to his cancelling the attack.”

The US military leadership also knew that White House claims that there could be no other source for the sarin gas than the Syrian army were false. “The American and British intelligence communities had been aware since the spring of 2013 that some rebel units in Syria were developing chemical weapons,” Hersh reports. “On 20 June analysts for the US Defense Intelligence Agency issued a highly classified five-page ‘talking points’ briefing for the DIA’s deputy director, David Shedd, which stated that al-Nusra maintained a sarin production cell…”

Hersh quotes extensively from this US government document, which the office of the US director of national intelligence now denies ever existed:

Al-Nusrah Front’s relative freedom of operation within Syria leads us to assess the group’s CW [chemical weapons] aspirations will be difficult to disrupt in the futureTurkey and Saudi-based chemical facilitators… were attempting to obtain sarin precursors in bulk, tens of kilograms, likely for the anticipated large scale production effort in Syria.”

Hersh notes that members of al-Nusra were arrested in Turkey last May in possession of two kilograms of sarin. They were charged in a 130-page indictment with “attempting to purchase fuses, piping for the construction of mortars, and chemical precursors for sarin.” All have since been released pending trial, or had charges dropped altogether.
Those arrests followed chemical weapons attacks in Syria in March and April 2013, where a UN investigation found evidence implicating the Syrian “rebels.” One source told Hersh, “Investigators interviewed the people who were there, including the doctors who treated the victims. It was clear that the rebels used the gas. It did not come out in public because no one wanted to know.”

The “no one,” of course, was the US government, its European allies, and its UN stooges—as well as their political apologists in the media and the pseudo-left groups such as the International Socialist Organization that were either openly campaigning for military intervention in Syria or justifying it by portraying the US-financed “rebels” as the bearers of a democratic revolution.

When the August 21 attack took place, Obama ordered the Pentagon to draw up plans for bombing Syria, and, as a former intelligence official told Hersh, “the White House rejected 35 target sets provided by the joint chiefs of staff as being insufficiently ‘painful’ to the Assad regime.”

The US bombing plan ultimately envisioned “a monster strike” involving two wings of B-52 bombers equipped with 2,000-pound bombs, as well as Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from submarines and surface warships.

Hersh continues: “The new target list was meant to ‘completely eradicate any military capabilities Assad had,’ the former intelligence official said. The core targets included electric power grids, oil and gas depots, all known logistic and weapons depots, all known command and control facilities, and all known military and intelligence buildings.”

The bombing attack drawn up at the direction of the Obama White House would have itself constituted a war crime, causing thousands if not tens of thousands of casualties and crippling Syria as a functioning society.

Hersh then passes on to his most important revelation: that US officials believed the Turkish government, or its intelligence agencies, had instigated the gas attack in Ghouta.

He cites concerns among US military and intelligence leaders that “there were some in the Turkish government” who supported “dabbling with a sarin attack inside Syria—and forcing Obama to make good on his red line threat.”

This was reinforced by the British military intelligence finding on the type of gas used in Ghouta. This included a message to the Americans: “We’re being set up here.” This was followed by a further message about the Ghouta attack that “a senior official in the CIA sent in late August: ‘It was not the result of the current regime [i.e., Assad]’. UK & US know this.”

Hersh suggests that the bitter controversy over the attack on a US consulate and CIA mission in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, which killed four Americans including the ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, is directly linked to the infighting over Syria.

It has been widely reported that the CIA organized the shipment of Libyan weapons stockpiles from Benghazi to the Syrian rebels. Hersh cites a “highly classified annex” to the report of the Senate committee that investigated the Benghazi attack.

This document “described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and [Turkish] Erdogan administrations… By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.”

According to Hersh, after the Benghazi fiasco, the CIA was pulled out, but the Libya to Turkey to Syria pipeline continued, possibly includingmanpads”—portable surface-to-air missile launchers, which the Obama administration had opposed supplying the rebels out of concern that they would be used to attack civilian airliners.  
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan tasked Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT) with engineering a provocation that would give a pretext for direct US military intervention. Hersh quotes his source: “‘The MIT was running the political liaison with the rebels, and the Gendarmerie handled military logistics, on-the-scene advice and training—including training in chemical warfare,’ the former intelligence official said. ‘Stepping up Turkey’s role in spring 2013 was seen as the key to its problems there… Erdogan’s hope was to instigate an event that would force the US to cross the red line. But Obama didn’t respond in March and April.’”

Two sources described to Hersh a working dinner during Erdogan’s visit to Washington in May 2013 in which Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Adviser Thomas Donilon met Erdogan, foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu and MIT chief Hakan Fidan. Erdogan appealed for Obama to attack Syria, telling him “your red line has been crossed.” Obama then pointed at Fidan and said, “We know what you’re doing with the radicals in Syria.”

Hersh cites a “US intelligence consultant” who describes a classified briefing for Martin Dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs, and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, prepared before the August 21 gas attack. The briefing noted “the acute anxiety” in the Erdogan regime over the military setbacks for the Syrian rebels and warned that the Turkish leadership felt “the need to do something that would precipitate a US military response.”

In the period following the gas attack, Hersh’s former intelligence official source explained, communications intercepts and other data supported the suspicion that Turkey had organized the Ghouta attack. “We now know it was a covert action planned by Erdogan’s people to push Obama over the red line,’ the former intelligence official said. ‘They had to escalate to a gas attack in or near Damascus when the UN inspectors’—who arrived in Damascus on 18 August to investigate the earlier use of gas—‘were there. The deal was to do something spectacular. Our senior military officers have been told by the DIA and other intelligence assets that the sarin was supplied through Turkey—that it could only have gotten there with Turkish support. The Turks also provided the training in producing the sarin and handling it.’”

Only a week ago, evidence surfaced that supports the credibility of Hersh’s report. A video was posted on YouTube of a meeting of Turkish officials, including Fikan, in which the intelligence chief suggests that Turkish agents should mount an attack on a Muslim shrine inside Syria to provide a pretext for a Turkish invasion of the country.

Hersh’s account is his second long exposé in four months of the “false flag” gas attack in Damascus. Both articles were published in the British journal because no major US newspaper or magazine will any longer publish material from the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist.

Beginning with his reporting of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam for the New York Times, Hersh has specialized in developing sources in the US military and intelligence apparatus, frequently those with policy differences with the current administration in Washington. Hersh left the Times for Newsday, and then wrote for the New Yorker for many years.

Both the New Yorker and the Washington Post refused to publish his first report on the Ghouta gas attack, which charged that the sarin attack had been carried out by Syrian rebels in the al-Nusra Front, forcing Hersh to find a British publisher for his account. The US press was largely silent on that report, and it has so far blacked out the latest exposure.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT

Wow, this is good stuff.

Hersh sounds like a hero ... but he's also a conduit for factions within the US government (via inside sources), so I don't know that this is a fully-fledged hero, or if it is just another establishment voice.  *Discovered he's 'blacklisted' by major US media, as they refuse to publish him.  So Hersh's probably cool. 

What Turkey is capable of is mind-blowing.

I don't mind the PKK giving it to them, now.

US media refusing to publish Hersh, and Hersh having to publish outside the country shows us just how controlled the media is in the land of the 'free'.

CIA strikes again.  That David Petraeus guy played a part, as well.

I'm not sure if that UK analyist has anything to do with David Kelly, who was killed, probably by UK intelligence (I'm guessing).

Daily Mail UK

Suicide riddle of weapons expert who worked with David Kelly: Scientist tells wife he is going for a walk, then takes his life in a field... just like his friend
A weapons expert who worked with Dr David Kelly at the Government’s secret chemical warfare laboratory has been found dead in an apparent suicide.

In circumstances strongly reminiscent of Dr Kelly’s own mysterious death nine years ago, the body of Dr Richard Holmes was discovered in a field four miles from the Porton Down defence establishment in Wiltshire. It is not yet known how he died.

Mr Holmes, 48, had gone missing two days earlier after telling his wife he was going out for a walk – just as Dr Kelly did before he was found dead at an Oxfordshire beauty spot in July 2003.

Police said there were no suspicious circumstances in the latest case but revealed that Dr Holmes  had ‘recently been under a great deal of stress’.

He resigned from Porton Down last month, although the centre yesterday refused to explain why.
Inevitably, the parallels between the two cases will arouse the suspicions of conspiracy theorists.

Despite Lord Hutton’s ruling eight years ago that Dr Kelly committed suicide, many people – among them a group of doctorsbelieve his inquiry was insufficient and have demanded a full inquest.

Some believe Dr Kelly, who kept an office at Porton Down right up until his death, was murdered. He was outed as being the source of a BBC report that Downing Street ‘sexed up’ evidence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war.

Although it is not clear if the two scientists were close, one source told The Mail on Sunday that they were friendly when they worked at Porton Down in the Nineties.

At the time, Dr Holmes ran a project organising the installation of chemical protection equipment in RAF Sentinel spy planes, while Dr Kelly was head of microbiology and frequently toured the former Soviet Union as a weapons inspector.

After the first Gulf War, Dr Holmes is also thought to have worked on the production of chemical protection suits for troops. In 1991 he was the joint author of a scientific paper about an RAF chemical and biological protection system.

Yesterday, a Porton Down spokesman confirmed Dr Holmes had quit his job but declined to comment further. ‘It is not our policy to speak openly about any individual who works for us,’ she said.

Before finding his body, Wiltshire Police made a public appeal for information but warned people not to approach Dr Holmes for their own safety because they believed he had been ‘looking at information on the internet regarding self-harm and the use of toxic substances’.  [Wiltshire Police spin-doctoring to shape public perceptions?  Hard to say what's going on here.  British scientists and intelligence officers seem to die frequently and suspiciously (think of the one found dead in the zipped up bag in a bath).  Whatever this is, it's occurred before the sarin attack in Ghouta.]

Friends of Dr Holmes say this disclosure irritated his family, who questioned why a scientist engaged in chemical warfare research would ‘need to Google toxic substances’.

Dr Holmes’s widow, Susan, is  a chemist who also works at  Porton Down as head of business administration.

One of the Government’s most sensitive and secretive military facilities, the site has long been the focus of controversy.

Three years ago hundreds of ex-servicemen who were used as chemical warfare guinea pigs there between 1939 and 1989 were given compensation and an apology from the Ministry of Defence.

They were tested with the nerve agent sarin, but some of those involved claimed they had been  told they were taking part in cold-remedy trials.

Many suffered serious illnesses after exposure to the gas, which was developed by the Nazis during the Second World War.

An inquest into Dr Holmes’s death was opened and adjourned by Wiltshire Coroner David Ridley last week. Coroner’s officer Paul Tranter said Dr Holmes’s family had grown concerned for his wellbeing after  he failed to return from a walk on April 11.

A search party involving police and members of the other emergency services began combing waste ground close to his home in the Bishopsdown area of Salisbury.

Police discovered his body half a mile away in a field used regularly by dog-walkers and joggers in the village of Laverstock.

Mr Tranter said the results of tests carried out to establish the cause of death would not be known for several weeks.

He added: ‘Police do not consider this death to be suspicious in any way, nor do they believe there was any third-party involvement.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133201/Dr-Richard-Holmes-Suicide-riddle-weapons-expert-worked-David-Kelly.html


Recapping

Sarin gas attack, Ghouta 
(suburb Damascus, Syria) - 21 Aug 2013
carried out by al-Nusra Front

al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' Western proxy opposition
as pretext for US attack on Syria
killed hundreds
compliant corporate US media points at Assad
New York Times is big-time US foreign policy shill
publishes report of CJ Chivers
purporting to show gas shells could only have been fired by Syrian Army (Assad's)

Porton Down
Defence lab in Wiltshire, UK
analysis sample sarin
{obtained by British Intel}
demonstrated gas used in Ghouta attack
did not match existing Syrian batches
case against Assad/Syria could not hold
Obama cancels well-planned attack
aiming to totally wipe out Syria govt military
[reported by Patrick Martin, WSWS, 7 April 2014]

Days later TWO YEARS EARLIER
22 April 2012 - Daily Mail UK
Dr Richard Holmes
head of microbiology
{who worked with murdered (2003) Dr David Kelly}
Porton Down
Defence lab in Wiltshire, UK
... just happens to 'commit suicide'
... just like Dr David Kelly happened to  *bullshit*

Dr David Kelly
revealed UK intelligence
report re illegal attack on Iraq 'sexed up'
Dr David Kelly Died:  2003

Dr Richard Holmes
head of microbiology
Dr Richard Holmes Died:  2012
Porton Down lab
no match Ghouta attack
with Syria / Assad govt
NOTE
21 Aug 2013 = Sarin attack, Ghouta, Syria
Dr Richard Homes died year prior
presumably no link to Sarin 
More on Dr David Kelly:

Ten Years Ago: The Death of Dr. David Kelly. Murdered on the Orders of Her Majesty’s Government?

By Dr. David Halpin and James Corbett
Global Research, July 19, 2013
GRTV 13 October 2011

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ten-years-ago-the-death-of-dr-david-kelly-murdered-on-the-orders-of-her-majestys-government/5343229


White House lied that sarin source was Syrian army / Assad
& US military leadership knew it
Both American & British intel knew
'rebels' (ie proxies) in Syria
were developing chemical weapons
Evidence Seymour Hersh (journalist) relies on
US Defence Intel - 5-page briefing proves this
DIA Dep. Dir, David Shed
states al-Nusra maintained sarin production cell
Turkey & Saudi-based chemical facilitators
--> US government denied existence of document

Not brought to public attention
Kept hushed by:
  • US govt
  • European allies
  • UN stooges
  • political apologists
  • media
  • pseudo-left groups

Obama had Pentagon draw attack plans re Syria
35 such plans rejected - not sufficiently destructive
monster strike planned - 2,000 pounds bombs
intended to completely destroy Assad military

US attack on Syria would have:
  • constituted another US war crime (like Iraq)
  • killed thousands
  • crippled Syria as functioning society
  • produced another Libya (civil war 4 years)

Hersh reports:
Turkish government or its Intelligence
(comment:  which is partner & co-conspirator of Turkish govt
as evidenced by leaked audio - Syria false flag plot)
INSTIGATED SARIN GAS ATTACK IN GHOUTA
This assertion is reinforced by British Porton Down lab finding
that Ghouta sample is NO match for Syria government
& UK & US know this

Infighting re Syria
linked to Benghazi, Libya
  • US Consulate & CIA Mission Attack
  • 4 dead Americans
  • incl. Ambassador to Libya
CIA was arranging shipments 
of Libya weapons stockpiles
from Benghazi to Syria proxies
2012 secret agreement b/w Obama & Turkey
funding for weapons from:
TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA, QATAR
CIA + MI6 running arms
from Gadaffi arsenals Libya
to Syria al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies attacking Syria govt
front companies set up
for cover, incl. Australian entities
retired US military
hired to manage procurement & shipping
op run by Gen David Petraeus, CIA Director
CIA reportedly pulled out post Benghazi
LIBYA to TURKEY to SYRIA weapons rat run continues
manpads / portable SAM launchers supplied to al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies
capable of air attacks
MIT tasked by Erdogan
to stage provocation, as pretext for US intervention
MIT runs liaison w/  al-Qaeda linked 'rebel' proxies
gendarmerie (military that is policing civilian sector)
handled logistics, training etc on site
gendarmerie (ie Turk military) training incl. chemical warfare
leaked Turkish authorities + intel audio
supports suspicion Turkey arranged Ghouta attack
Sarin supplied via Turkey
w/ Turkish support + handling training

No major US newspaper or US magazine
will publish any material from Seymour Hersh any longer -- ie he must be blacklisted

New Yorker & Washington Post
refused to publish Seymour Hersh Ghouta gas attack first report
that indicated al-Nusra Front
(al-Qaeda linked, Turkish & Western backed 'rebel' proxy)
linked to Ghouta chemical attack



Original Seymour Hersh Article

The Red Line and the Rat Line
Seymour M. Hersh on Obama, Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels
Vol. 36 No. 8 · 17 April 2014
pages 21-24 | 5870 words
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line


David Cameron's Shameless Attack on Russia
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/russia-west-gas-attack-syria

Is Dave aware that Hersh has exposed the lot of them?