Beware American Capitalist Sponsored Globalist Shills

Biggest Threat is American Capitalist Sponsored Globalist Intelligentsia Shills Lobbying for the Destruction of Europeans Express http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/695927/Angela-Merkel-bigger-threat-Europe-than-ISIS-claims-Professor-Francis-Fukuyam SHOCK CLAIM: Angela Merkel is BIGGER threat to Europe than ISIS, claims US professor   ANGELA Merkel's failure to lead is a bigger threat to Europe's survival than Islamic State (ISIS), claims a US political scientist. By Katie Mansfield and Monika Pallenberg PUBLISHED: 03:44, Wed, Aug 3, 2016 | UPDATED: 10:01, Wed, Aug 3, 2016 In a scathing interview Professor Francis Fukuyama says Angela Merkel only cares about approval ratings and has hardly achieved anything for Europe. Speaking to Die Welt, the Stanford University professor discusses the dangers of extremists to the survival of mankind and says the biggest threat is the rise of populism due to weak European leadership. [comment:  it wasn't the 'populism' that this twat disdains, and it wasn't 'Nazis', driving that Nice-Attack bus, just as it wasn't 'populism' and 'Nazis' that knifed genitals, plucked out eyeballs and stuffed testicles into mouths at the Bataclan torture-mutilation bloodbath in France. ] He said: "The jihadist ideology only has few followers. Of course it poses a serious threat, but the greatest threat to the survival of our democracy is a different one. It lies in ourselves."  [comment:  who is he speaking for?  Who appointed Fukuyama spokesperson for European nations?  Oh, American capitalists.  That makes sense, then.  They're intent on destroying Europe like they have destroyed United States.  Furthermore, 'our democracy' is bullsh*t and rule by capitalist corruption.  This guy is completely full of crap and this is an attempt to manipulate the public with the lie of 'democracy' (which is really:  CAPITALIST TYRANNY).] When questioned on what he meant, Professor Fukuyama said: "The fear driven by loss of confidence of our citizens in our own institutions. "This way populism, which promises potentially lethal measures, can grow. "Unfortunately this is the result of a disturbing lack of leadership that currently exists in Europe." The 63-year-old was then asked to give an example. He said: "Let's take Germany. It was supposed to be the country that leads Europe to peace and prosperity.  [comment:  it is a country that was defeated in WWII and it has been occupied by US-Anglo capitalism since its defeat.  The capitalist occupation that is destroying Europe has nothing to do with 'leading' Europe to 'peace' or anything else that serves the vital interests of Europeans.  What a crock of crap this is.   Why is he selling this crap?  Defeated US-Anglo Capitalist Empire puppet state, Germany, leading 'Europe to peace'?  Sure, shill.  While American capitalist mercenary NATO is training missiles on Russia, right on Russia's doorstep and provoking military engagement with both Russia and China, having destroyed a series of nations in the Middle East and Africa.] "Instead Chancellor Angela Merkel only cares about the approval of her own country. "Her behaviour during the Euro crisis and the disputes with Greece was significant. Now she does the same with the Italian banks. "The bad part is that this lack of leadership is not compensated for by other European heads of state, not by Francois Hollande, nor by the disastrous Cameron, who has by now resigned. "These are all low level politicians who really have achieved hardly anything for Europe." His comments come as the German Chancellor faces a backlash across Europe, with many blaming her open door refugee policy for a spate of terror attacks in Germany. Thousands attended an anti-immigration rally in Berlin on Saturday with banners reading 'Merkel must go' and 'The queen of smugglers, Merkel must leave' seen in the crowds. More than one million migrants have entered Germany in the past year, with many fleeing war in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq.  [comment:  and everywhere else in Asia and Africa. ] Professor Fukuyama said: "The welcoming policies are admirable. But also very dangerous. They can cause a devastating turmoil within the European Community. "There are limits in regards to the integration ability of newcomers. And Schengen has gaps everywhere at its external borders."   [comment:  Integration?  This academic is a fool.  There is no integrating foreigners into European homelands.  There is merely the divestment of European heritage and the destruction of Europe.] The professor, who is known for his book The End of History and the Last Man, also blasted Donald Trump in the interview, branding him "a threat to American democracy".  [comment:  Trump, a "threat to democracy".  Did the CIA put him up to this, seeing one of their own, rat-faced Michael Morrell, has been squawking what a national security 'threat' Trump is?  LMAO.  Biggest threat to the planet is Hillary Clinton, the CIA and the US-Anglo Capitalist Empire.  And 'democracy'?  F*ck off, shill.  There is no 'democracy'.  There is just rule by corrupt American oligarchy, in the paragon of capitalist fraud 'democracy' and multiracial soup slops, crime-ridden, cop killing, whites murdering and raping, looting and rioting, divided in perpetuity, USA.   What fool would model their nation (let alone divest their own people of a nation) in the image of this vile hell on earth?   ] http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/695927/Angela-Merkel-bigger-threat-Europe-than-ISIS-claims-Professor-Francis-Fukuyam Sam Gerrans Democracy: A Heretic's View (2004) LINK | here COMMENT The threat to Europe and European societies is a DEMOGRAPHIC THREAT.   It is that simple.  Wake up. Screw 'democracy'.  Democracy does not exist:  it's fraud and there is nothing but capitalist rule that has destroyed United States and is destroying European societies. Furthermore, by DEFINITION 'democracy' is f*cking 'populism', you capitalist sponsored intelligentsia twat.

Germany is Not a Sovereign State - Dr. Wolfgang Schauble

Germany Not a Sovereign State - Dr. Wolfgang Schauble http://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/germany-not-sovereign-state Germany is not a sovereign state Submitted by Editor on 2013-02-21 01:30:39 Manuel Ochsenreiter - Manuel, please, can you to characterize contemporary foreign policy of Germany, it's implications toward EU, changes during last years and possible perspectives? - The contemporary foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) is not a foreign policy an independent and sovereign state would make. Berlin foreign politicians and so called “foreign policy experts” of the established parties in the Bundestag attach great importance to the fact that Germany is “embedded” in the foreign policy of the “transatlantic values” of the European Union or the NATO. By the way, the fact that Germany is not a sovereign state is not a conspiracy theory. The German Minister of finance Dr. Wolfgang Schauble said during the European Banking Congress on November 18 2011: “But in Germany since May 8, 1945 [the unconditional surrender of the German Wehrmacht] at no time have we been fully sovereign”. When we analyze German foreign policy especially since the reunification in 1990 when the so called “post war era” ended officially, we can see clearly that from the German side there were no attempts to regain full sovereignty, although it might have been possible. Instead, Germany participated as a willing NATO-“partner” in conflicts (e.g. Somalia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Syria, Mali). We don't witness any independent German foreign policy activities. Of course there are also some little exceptions. Just one example of an exception: When in 2003 the discussion went on if Germany should participate in the military aggression against Iraq, the German Federal Chancellor Gerhard Schroder from the social democrats refused to be with the US. The opposition leader in that time, Angela Merkel from the Christian democratic union (the Federal Chancellor today!), attacked Schroder in a speech in the Bundestag with the following words: “We don't want a German Sonderweg [special path]!” She expressed clearly that in her opinion there is no other option than supporting the US in the aggression against Baghdad. But we shouldn't forget in that context that Schroder's government already participated in the conflicts in Kosovo and Afghanistan. Schroder's coalition of social democrats and greens ordered the German air force to bombard the Serbian capital Belgrade. But when it came to the Iraq aggression, a huge German peace movement became very active with demonstrations in the German cities. So it was more or less about collecting their votes than a general change in German foreign policy. Everything must be permitted or confirmed by the western “friends” or “partners”. Germany even reforms its army, the Bundeswehr, in a way that it is not anymore a classical defense army but a global rapid deployment force. The Bundeswehr today is seen as an element of the western military forces but not as an independent German army. There is one important point. The German foreign policy today is not “suffering” under western or EU pressure. All these things happen by the free will of the German politicians in Berlin. This is easy to explain. Especially US-dominated NGOs and foundations take care about the careers and education of German politicians since decades. When we look for example at the activities of the group “Atlantik-Brucke” (“Atlantic bridge”) which was founded in 1952 in Bonn (West-Germany), we have to see that almost all established  political parties and media companies in Germany are influenced by that organization. More than 500 elites from the banking sector, economy, political parties, media, and science are organized in the “Atlantik-Brucke”. You find there social democrats as well as liberals and conservative, even greens. With the so called “young leader” program they secure the supply of “new blood”. In the official statement it sounds like this: “In 1973 the Young Leaders Program was added to Atlantik-Brucke’s repertoire. With it the Atlantik-Brucke promotes interaction between rising young German and American professional leaders”. But the “Atlantik-Brucke” is just one of the many organizations that “shape” German foreign policy in a way that Berlin seems to be more or less a satellite of Washington. The western hegemony is fully developed in German policy. For the near future it doesn't seem that there might be any big change. And just to mention in this context, the first NATO Secretary General, Lord Ismay, said in 1949 that the organization's goal was “to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.” Although we are talking since 1990 about the reforms and new aims of the NATO, we have to admit that nothing changed. Lord Ismay's statement is as actual as it was in 1949. And Germany right now doesn't have a problem to be “kept down”. - Is there any attempts to opposite initiatives of U.S. for global dominance such as concept of Anchor States proposed by Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development? - Unfortunately, even the concept of the “Ankerstaaten” [Anchor States] doesn't really oppose the US global dominance. It simply recognizes the fact that other states develop to influential powers in their regions. But the original document of the Ministry from 2004 says clearly that those new powers, the Anchor States, might have a positive or negative influence on their specific region. And in the “Leitlinien” - the guidelines of the concept given by the Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development we can read that Germany acts in “strategic alliances with the EU and other bi- and multinational donors”, and that Germany wants to enforce the integration of the Anchor States into the “international community of shared values”. So if we to analyze the Anchor State concept in a pessimistic way, we have to state that this concept is a pure western hegemony doctrine and not an idea to oppose US dominance. - How going actualization of this process of dialogue between countries of Asia, Africa and South America? - This dialogue fits perfectly to the western agenda. You will not find any “German attempts” here. For the Russian Federation and China the so called “human rights” questions are dominant. We witnessed the campaigns during the Pussy Riot scandal. Many German established politicians didn't hesitate to call Russia a type of dictatorship with President Vladimir Putin as an “almighty” leader. Sometimes the hostility towards Russia is conspicuous. The announcement that Putin would receive the official German Quadriga award in 2011 was widely condemned. As a result of protests by Quadriga board members and former recipients all the 2011 awards and ceremonies were cancelled. Same thing with China. Also here Germany acts as a political “housemaster” for liberal “western values”. So dialogue is a strong word. What takes place in reality is schoolmastering. And we can see the same things in the majority of “dialogues” Germany has with the so called Anchor States. The dialogue with Iran shows that Berlin is one of the motors of the policy of sanctions against Teheran because of defending alleged Israeli and US interests instead German interests. The dialogue with Turkey doesn't deserve the term “dialogue”. The large Turkish national minority in Germany is abused by the Ankara government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan as a “fifth column” for influencing German interior policy. Turkey, as a “NATO-partner”, is under the direct protection of Washington. These are just some examples of dialogue. The rule is: Berlin will not do anything that opposes the US-hegemony. Germany with those personal elite will not follow its national interest. - Representatives of German government some time ago told about necessity to back golden reserves to the country. Why it happens? - The real questions should be as follows: Why did it take so long until our politicians became active? More than two thirds of Germany's gold reserves valued at 137 billion euros or $183 billion is abroad, stored in the vaults in New York, Paris, and London. The official reason: During the Cold War times the gold was transferred from Frankfurt to USA, UK, and France because it is more secure in case of a Soviet attack. Frankfurt was considered too “close to the iron curtain”. The Cold war ended 23 years ago. But some analysts say it might be for a certain reason that the German gold is in the vaults of the western allied powers of World War II. Why is Germany only now interested to get the gold of the Bundesbank back? It might have to do with the crisis of the euro and with the European economic crisis in general. Some analysts like the UK based financial journalist Matthew Lynn speaks out very clearly: “German sentiment is hardening against the single currency with every month that passes. What is a whole vault full of gold in the basement of your central bank good for exactly after all? Starting a new currency of course.” So hopefully this might be the overture for the comeback of the Deutsche Mark. To be honest I doubt that our government thinks that way. But hope dies last. - Is any signals in military sector for re-nationalization (I mean decrease of NATO and US influence on German military planning, strategy and so on)? - No especially that the military sector becomes more and more fully integrated into the NATO-structures. Germany is “castrating” its own security forces. They are not fit anymore for homeland defense but as an element for international operations. We practically abolished conscription in July 2011 which was a long term tradition of the German forces and a base for the national defense. Germany never seemed so far away from a re-nationalization of its military defense as seen nowadays. Although during the Cold War times West German generals opposed the NATO-plan that Germany should become a nuclear battle field in case of a hot conflict with the Eastern block. - What is your opinion about idea of Multistakeholder-approach developed by German think-tank SWP? - Generally it would be crazy to deny the danger of cyber-attacks against infrastructure of a country. And it would be crazy as well to deny the necessity of international cooperation in this new battle field. We should be prepared and build up a well-organized defense structure. But “Angst” (fear) alone is always a bad advisor for reacting in a clever way to such threats. So we should read the SWP-concept of the Multistakeholder approach very clearly before we celebrate a plan to protect our countries against cyber-attacks. First of all we should take into account that the SWP is not an independent think-tank although it claims to be independent. The SWP is supported by several German and EU-governmental institutions as some German ministries and the European Commission. The author of the Multistakeholder-concept, Dr. Annegret Bendiek, is Deputy Head of Research Division “EU External Relations” of the SWP. So we can say that the SWP is more or less part of a multinational network. And the Multistakeholder-concept should be read carefully, precisely, and accurately. It contains ideas of mixing up the cyber security tasks with the private sector and the so called “civil society”, and that this cooperation should happen with “equal rights” of all participants. This means nothing else other than giving state functions to non-state institutions. At the same time it mentions the fields of inner and foreign politics “melting” with each other. And the concept is again a very US-related. It gives the impression that the threat generally comes from the “evil” east but never from the west! So when we analyze the concept we see that it contains in many ways guidelines how to disintegrate more and more sovereign state tasks. The concept follows the postmodern trend determining that the state alone is not able to take care of traditional state organized challenges. When it comes to security issues, maybe the most important national challenge for any state, we should be very careful. We should also be careful when such concepts tell us today where the future threats will come from exactly. We can interpret this in two ways. The author is able to read in the coffee cup and knows exactly what will happen in the future, or the author follows an explicit frontline given to him by the party ordering the research study. - What is role of Germany in Cyber-G5 (Deutschland, Frankreich, Gro?britannien, Niederlande, Schweden) and how Bundestag reflects on cyberpolicy and cyberthreats in general? The results of summit in Dubai shows red line between Russia, China, India, Iran etc. and U.S. + E.U. on other side that mean possible confrontation in this specific domen in future. - The cyber policy is a political field which is underestimated by the majority of political analysts today. Let us talk frankly. Cyber policy is a part of the so called western concept of “world inner policy”. It denies national sovereignty. The European concept is close to the US concept given by the former US head of state department Hillary Clinton. She declared the “freedom of the internet” a “fundamental principle” of the US foreign policy. By the way, this was the justification of supporting the Libyan Sunni extremist fighters during their war against the Gaddafi-regime in capturing big parts of the Libyan national mobile phone network. The “freedom of the internet” argument is used right now to support anti-state groups with communication material. State sovereignty, where information policy is also an important part of state security, is violated by those Washington activities nonstop. In the so called “Cyber-G5” group, the German government supports exactly this understanding of the “freedom of the internet”.  Again German SWP-authors (Annegret Bendiek, Marcel Dickow and Jens Meyer) framed the concept in an article for “SWP-Aktuell”: The authors speak about an “emancipating and democratizing effect” of the internet and mention the so called “Arab Spring” as an evidence, although in the “Spring”-countries sunni islamist governments came to power who are not really well known for supporting “information freedom”. So we cannot ignore the fact that what is called today with a nice term “freedom of the internet” might be tomorrow already the justification for violating the sovereignty of those states that don't obey that idea. This is also cynicism and hypocrisy. While talking about the “freedom of the internet” and “freedom of information” all over the world the EU-countries violate freedom of speech and press inside. So we can say that the “freedom of the internet” policy is nothing else other than an instrument to violate and destabilize other states in the future. And of course there is a fat red line between the west and those states that have a strong sovereign agenda such as Russia, China, India or Iran. - And what you think about trade relations and it's link with politics and ideology? For example, last year presence of German companies in Russia become smaller than before. - I consider Germany and Russia as natural partners in business and trade. Unfortunately the political situation doesn't encourage good and prosperous business relations. Germany is Russia's second biggest trade partner after China. We import resources and export industrial goods and high technology. In a positive political atmosphere Germany and Russia could benefit much more by close relations, not just in the economic field. But as long as the guidelines for German foreign politics are written in Washington and Brussels I don't see big chances for a change. But why not think ahead? There are plenty of fields for great future cooperation. Germany and Russia could build up Northern East Prussia in modern day Russian exclave “Oblast Kaliningrad” with a joint venture! Konigsberg (Kaliningrad), the old Prussian town, could become again a capital of German-Russian free state outside the EU. Why shouldn't we combine our skills there on a historical soil. Konigsberg used to be an important center for north eastern European trade. Of course for many readers this might sound like fantasy and very unrealistic. But the people who talked in 1988 and even in summer 1989 about a German reunification were also considered as lunatics. So why not be little bit crazy and think about such great opportunities. Things might change, and sometimes very quickly. - Actually what is geopolitical thought of Germany now? It mostly unknown in Russia. After Haushoffers (father and son) and few names there is no information about it, expect discourse of some political scientists, but not geopoliticians. - Geopolitics is banned in Germany since 1945. It was considered especially by the US as one of the evil sources of “German aggression”. So what does that mean today? The German authorities don't consider Germany itself to be an independent global player anymore. Geopolitically Germany became a full part of the so called “western international community” although this is anti-historical. Germany used to be a central European state, a bridge between east and west. This thinking almost disappeared. If I personally want to talk with someone about geopolitics and e.g. about Haushofer's ideas I have to find most probably a Russian or Middle Eastern conversation partner. Interviewed by Leonid Savin IMAGE Manuel Ochsenreiter (right) and professor Alexander Dugin (left) in Freiburg, Germany http://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/germany-not-sovereign-state Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP) German Institute for International and Security Affairs leading German think tank founding institution behind the German Institute for International and Security Affairs [wikipedia] Other:  http://archive.is/QSeGg ---------------------- ---------------------- COMMENT Once again, my gut instincts are confirmed correct. The puppet state that is Germany follows the foreign policy of its American masters, supporting attack of sovereign foreign states, as subservient on-call American deployed attack-dog, while neglecting to even try to establish the German nation's sovereignty, over 70 years after Germany's defeat, and some decades since German reunification (1990). Germany's politicians excel at pissing on the German and European people, as we're seen from Merkel's invasion of Europe policy. That apparently extends to dismantling national defence capabilities of the German army, while pursuing a policy of  providing the Americans with a ready rapid deployment force to violate some more countries with, and a policy of borderless and unprotected German and European suicide. Meanwhile German taxpayers are fleeced to the tune of €34.4 billion (1.2% of German GDP, 2014) and Germany is among the top ten in the world for military spending. But the US extortionist, NATO, wants yet more from the German vassal:  ie 2%.  Hypocritical US-shaped German politicians are also pissing on the very principles that are the cornerstones of purported Western 'freedoms' and 'democracy', demonstrating that the controlled German politicians, much like their two-faced con-artist oligarchy-serving American political master counterparts, have no regard whatsoever for:  self-determination, justice, freedom, or freedom of speech. Instead, Germany exploits the very principles it pays lip service to, manipulating public perception and sentiment, via the controlled media that has been exploiting and selling: the fantasy of 'noble' American 'protector' intent, to window-dress the vassalage of Europe; the fantasy of Western 'freedom', while Germany's violating liberties such as freedom of association; freedom of political affiliation; freedom of intellectual and political conviction; freedom from state harassment and freedom from infiltration of one's political organisations by state agents; freedom from communications harassment and censorship; freedom from ongoing state harassment and state attempts at political party shut-down etc; to name but a few such violations (while Germany's US-Anglo masters have been exposed violating entire countries, deploying American empire mass surveillance); above all, selling the fantasy of post-WWII constitutionally-mandated American-designed 'united Europe,' a project that has since manifested itself in the unholy supranational European Union alliance of the obliging neocon American puppet elites; the philosophical fantasy of 'universalism' above ancestral identity, along with the worship of universal 'human rights' ideology, which is accompanied by Western media and educational indoctrination to the point of absurdity, and has paved the way to exploitation of the assailed and politically castrated masses by their pious, moralising, instructing, and supremely virtuous intelligentsia 'betters' and the violent, lunatic left government shills that are never condemned as extremists that they are in the controlled media;  the fantasy of Western 'moral superiority,' with the US-Anglo war criminals cast in the role of  'champions', priests and popes of this universalist  'religion' of the American capitalist empire; so as to embed in the realm of public perception, a fantasy of Western 'moral high ground', while deceitfully, callously, pre-emptively & hypocritically smearing targets of American aggression that have been designated 'official enemies and targets of future American aggression, by joining the controlled media (and controlled Western politician counterparts), in the chorus of orchestrated disapproval, for public consumption   (see 2012 Bundestag 124-member signed letter to Russian ambassador re Pussy Riot). And that's when these principles are not more aggressively exploited as instruments of coercion and pretexts for economic and other sanctions (eg.  Iran 40 years of sanctions; Iraq sanctions - millions of dead children, but American Madeline Albright thinks it was worth it), and even pretexts for US-led unlawful, strategic war of aggression by way of unprovoked military attack. All of the above applies to German hypocrisy and to that of Germany's Western counterparts, save that they are not occupied in the way that defeated Germany remains occupied. -------/\/\/ *What does the following say about the silent, Western, controlled corporate media collective, that has never referred to Clinton, Bush, Killary or Obomber -- actual war criminals -- as 'strongmen', for example, while it routinely smears Russia's President Putin? Bill Clinton   Bill Clinton Illegal Bomber of Serbia with support of prisoner of war Germany (strategic US ambitions) Bomber of Sudan medicine factory (Lewinsky cover-up) Cruise Missile Bomber of Iraq (strike in violation of international law) War Criminal Joke States Czech Republic, Papua New Guinea, POW Germany & site of 'surprise' US military base: Kosovo honoured Bomber Bill Clinton  Killary Clinton famous for Libya Benghazi missing $6-billion ... yes, BILLION ... & missing state e-mails Killary Clinton "“And in denying that it represented policy she – under oath – essentially admitted to the fact pattern of US policy being regime change in Libya and the killing of Gaddafi. Both are war crimes, both are prosecutable acts at the International Criminal Court, and her statements were made under oath,” the analyst stated." here Pussy Riot US Empire, US Vassals' & Controlled- Media Darlings -------/\/\/ Yet Germany's US NGO-moulded politicians have the nerve to criticise Russia regarding Provocateurs-R-Us, Pussy Riot, while the German US-controlled, prisoner of war, puppet state: imprisons those that raise an arm at a "politically incorrect angle";  imprisons the  likes of 87 year old Ursula Haverbeck  for speaking her mind; and while Germany, 'paragon' of progressive European 'liberty', has spent multiple decades harassing free-thinker Ernst Zundel, over six prisons and two continents, effectively kidnapping or pretty much 'renditioning' Zundel from Canada (albeit, with Canadian court approval), without charge, before imprisoning kidnapped free-thinker Zundel in the totalitarian, American-dominated puppet 'German' state that is ruled by self-serving elites -  ibid &  here. Ernst Zundel had lived and worked in Canada for 40 years without criminal charge. Zundel's sanctioned kidnap to Germany, without charge, was on the basis of  allegations, and on the basis that his website could be read in Germany*. Let's not forget the unjust and undemocratic imprisonment Zundel's lawyer, Sylvia Stolz, imprisoned for over 3 years and barred from practising law (video), pursuant to a victor-dictated 'German' totalitarian, unconditional surrender 'constitution,' enforced without challenge by the craven, US-indoctrinated German puppet politicians. *What does that say about the collusion of Western governments and courts to violate the rights of Westerners? *What does that say about Germany's portrayal as the bastion of internet and information freedom in Europe and champion of Western 'dissenters' when Germany violates the rights of Germans and even Germans abroad? *What does that say about American 'dissident', NGO and Western controlled-media darlings, who choose US-controlled prisoner of war Germany as an 'escape' from US persecution?   Germany remains an occupied state, yet it's a magnet for American dissidents.  Go figure. -------/\/\/  [Click image to enlarge] German elites that profit from and carry out American orders, and the Americans that pull the strings behind the scenes, are responsible for violations of German liberty, continued violation of German sovereignty and for violation of the German right to self-determination. And it's the Americans who are therefore ultimately responsible for the present-day invasion of Europe, for the implementation of the policy that spells the destruction of Europe, and for the damage to European self-determination, in the short term, and the damage to all  European people who are at risk and shall remain at perpetual risk bearing the costs and consequences of invasion of their ancestral lands and their unique societies, at the end of the day. Among a number of negative consequences of mass immigration, the capacity to continue to exercise national self-determination is irrevocably damaged, in what can only be a perpetual, enduring and increasing cycle of divestment of native European host peoples in relation to foreign populations, as foreign populations grow biologically and through continued immigration. Slavic народ = narod = people род = rod = to give birth to, to produce, to bring forth (crops) also:  family, clan [source:  'Thinking about the Environment: Our Debt to the Classical and Medieval Past' - By T. M. Robinson, Laura Westra - page 88] the prefix 'на' or 'na' = on so народ = narod = people = on-birth  While the word 'narod' is applicable in general terms to all people, it is interesting that at its root this Slavic word appears to be comprised of the words for 'on' and 'birth'. When a nation is no longer comprised of  one people, whose political power is vested in that people, the capacity to exercise self-determination as a people is lost. Merkel was merely mouthpiece here. The US-Anglo alliance uses Germany, as if Germany were some independent, dynamic mover and shaker, when, in fact, they still control Germany behind the scenes, while making out the decisions are big, bad Germany's or something like that.  That's the impression I have, especially when it comes to the EU. Time Magazine didn't waste any time sending the world's plebs its endorsement and propaganda 'positive' messaging. -------/\/\/ TIME WARNER STUDY IN CONTRASTS E U R O P E -------/\/\/ What's France's excuse, I wonder? Funny how France and Britain, the WWII allied occupiers, aren't scapegoated like the Germans are for the European Union abomination that is their 'baby'. The European Union is yet another US-Anglo empire (and Franco bloc) post-WWII concocted institution that is primarily a vehicle for American financial, corporate and political interests, in the ongoing post WWII exercise of American power over Europe. Dr Wolfgang Schauble's remarks on the 'constitution' even refer to the alien concept of a 'united Europe', versus a  Europe comprised of sovereign nations and sovereign peoples, as has been historically the case in Europe from time immemorial: "...  In the preamble 1949 it says the goal is to serve the peace of the world as an equal partner in a united Europe." [video ibid] The controlled Western media and the US-Anglo political agenda serving 'humanitarian' shilling Western NGO's: do not condemn the violation of rights of politically persecuted Germans (and their defenders), the designated ideological 'lepers' that are dutifully smeared in the press; do not condemn the violation of the rights of native European populations that are subjected to invasion, deceit, political suppression, and decimation by invasion; nor do they condemn the destruction of Europe and the destruction of the European peoples; as the 'free press' is actually the corporate, controlled press and they, along with the Western NGO 'do-gooders', are in the business of maintaining and applauding the edifice that is US-Anglo led Western hypocrisy and farce. Watch while they give each other self-congratulatory awards, as 'defenders' of values and principles they merely function to help exploit. -------/\/\/ And Vladimir Putin is the 'dictator'? What lies and hypocrisy. -------/\/\/ Imperial Russian Army Song Взвейтесь, соколы, орлами! Vzveytes Sokoly Orlami Soar, falcons, eagles! Soar, falcons, eagles! Full of grief grieve! Whether it under tents In the camp stand! Взвейтесь, соколы, орлами! Полно горе горевать! То ли дело под шатрами В поле лагерем стоять! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jqXkzggwi4&feature=youtu.be GERMANY PROTESTS NATO April 2015 RT News -------/\/\/ German Inquisition Anti-Zensur-Koalition 8th Internationale Konferenz Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden: The Reality of Freedom of Expression Speaker:  Sylvia Stolz Ivo Sasek Moderator / Announcer Our last speaker of the day will be speaking on the theme "Speech Forbidden, Evidence Forbidden, Legal Defence Forbidden." That's taking it to the next level [forbidding legal defence], and it relates to a still larger problem. This is a fully qualified lawyer, an Assessor Juris, and in listening to her it is particularly important that we don't let our judgment be influenced by what we have previously seen or heard. She really made the headlines a few years ago as a defence attorney. So let me briefly explain whom we are dealing with. This attorney is-- No, don't clap yet, we're not quite there. [laughs] This defence attorney has the courage of a lion. She is stronger than a man, and I have never met a woman with such a profile. She bravely stood up and took it upon herself to defend Ernst Zundel in the famous case against him for so-called Holocaust denial. She was the trial lawyer of Ernst Zundel. During the legal proceedings she presented evidence to the court which would raise doubts regarding the official account of history. This caused a furore in the courtroom. And she was prohibited from speaking any further. This speech ban was ordered as she was presenting the arguments of the defendant. She was not allowed to argue the case and barred from listing more evidence. She ignored the speech ban and continued to submit evidence. She was then threatened with penalties if she persisted. And this defence attorney simply kept going. As it became too much for the authorities, she was arrested right there in the courtroom during her defence of the so-called 'Holocaust denier' Ernst Zundel. But not even this would silence her; if I remember correctly, they had her carried out and she continued to argue, she simply kept presenting evidence on behalf of her client.  And for this she was imprisoned for almost three and a half years.  Arrested in the courtroom and locked up. On top of this, she had to face 5 years of professional exclusion, through cancellation of her licence to work as an attorney, she was removed from the Association of German Lawyers.  They threw her out, but we would like to carry her into our midst. I urge you to help her along. [applause] TRANSCRIPT from [confirm audio for quotations]: SOURCE - VIDEO - LAWYER SYLVIA STOLZ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCuwbbNQcZI

Germany - Over 600 New Year's Eve Assault Complaints - Politician Sweet Nothings Pacifying the Sheeple

ꕤ Article SOURCE as marked Germany - Over 600 New Year's Eve Assault Complaints - Politician Sweet Nothings Pacifying the Sheeple  Google Translate Nearly 400 complaints of assault filed in Cologne By BOURSIER.COM Nearly 400 complaints of assault filed in Cologne     FRANKFURT, Germany (Reuters) - Three hundred and seventy-nine complaints have been filed to date regarding the attacks suffered by women in Cologne during the New Year's Eve, said the German police, whose investigations orient in large part to asylum seekers or illegal migrants.        Forty per cent of these complaints relate to sexual assaults, including two rapes, police said, which mobilized hundreds of its ...     Read more: Almost 400 complaints of assault filed in Cologne    http://www.boursier.com/forum/actualites/generales/pres-de-400-plaintes-pour-agressions-deposees-a-cologne-i253200-1.html More than 600 complaints for assault in Germany FRANKFURT, Germany (Reuters) - More than 600 complaints have been filed in Germany for the assaults of women were victims during the New Year's Eve, said the German police, whose investigations are moving in large part to asylum seekers or illegal migrants. In Cologne, in the west, police recorded 516 complaints filed by individuals or groups, while in Hamburg, in the north, she recognizes 133. Complaints have also been reported in Frankfurt, though in numbers much less important. Forty per cent of these complaints relate to sexual assaults, including two rapes, police said, which mobilized hundreds of its agents to conduct investigations. These attacks, which targeted mostly women victims of pickpocketing or sexual assault, have sparked a lively debate in Germany on the reception of migrants and refugees, 1.1 million arrived on German soil in 2015. A 19 year old Moroccan was arrested Saturday night in Cologne, as part of the investigation. "There have been arrests and we will continue to make arrests," promised Sunday a spokesman for the Cologne police. "What happened in Cologne was unbelievable and unacceptable," said the newspaper Österreich Austrian Minister of the Interior Johanna Mikl-Leitner, member of the Austrian People's Party (ÖVP, conservative). NO CHARGE TO DATE Similar attacks took place in Salzburg, Austrian city on the border with Germany. "Such criminals should be deported," said the Austrian Minister, echoing a proposal made Saturday by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. This series of assaults provoked demonstrations Saturday in Cologne, one of which was organized by the anti-immigration movement pegida. Clashes took place and riot police dispersed the German far-right demonstrators protesting against aggression. Protesters, some wearing tattoos with symbols of the extreme right, like a skull from a German soldier's helmet, chanted "Merkel out!" and "Here's what National Resistance!". Shortly before the event begins in Cologne, the Chancellor had clamped down against migrants by promising to expel convicts and reduce the influx of refugees in the long term in Germany. A spokesman for the Interior Ministry said Friday that at least 22 asylum seekers had been identified at this stage among the perpetrators of the serial violence. A total of 32 suspects have been identified and interviewed. Nine are Algerian nationals, eight are Moroccans, five Iranians, four Syrians and an Iraqi. Three are German. No one has been charged yet. [comment:   'German'?  What kind of 'German':  native German or foreigner?  What's the bet that it's yet more foreigners?] (Eric Faye and Jean-Philippe Lefief for the French service) https://archive.is/PFtON http://www.boursier.com/actualites/reuters/plus-de-600-plaintes-pour-agressions-deposees-en-allemagne-184933.html?fil1 ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT None of those people belong in Germany, criminal or not.   So there is no 'making good' of anything in any way in Germany, or elsewhere in Europe, by deporting the occasional alien -- assuming one can find a loophole to do so, which is next to impossible & costs the domestic taxpayer, anyway. International treaties need to be rescinded and all such non-European aliens ought to be deported at the expense of George Soros, or whoever else financed their invasion of Europe. Europe Is Doomed By 2020 30 Invaders Assaulting German Woman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIfNL4e70Pw Hungarian trucker  Plague of invaders https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItiDtXKRQgg Idea If a country permits aliens to invade its soil and if those aliens represent a security risk (which they do in the short-term and in the long-term and broader sense), then surely this is a casus belli, upon which neighbouring nations can rely upon to initiate immediate military assault and military occupation? Russia, please take over Germany, as it is a security threat to all of Europe.  ꕤ

First American Cartoonist/Journalist Reportedly In Hiding From Radical Islam (4 Years) - Molly Norris

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us/17cartoon.html?_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us/17cartoon.html?_r=0 Cartoonist in Hiding After Death Threats By BRIAN STELTERSEPT. 16, 2010 A cartoonist in Seattle who promoted an “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” last spring is now in hiding after her life was threatened by Islamic extremists. The cartoonist, Molly Norris, has changed her name and has stopped producing work for a local alternative newspaper, Seattle Weekly, according to the newspaper’s editor, Mark D. Fefer. Mr. Fefer declined an interview request Thursday, citing “the sensitivity of the situation.” But in a letter to readers about Ms. Norris on Wednesday, he said that “on the insistence of top security specialists at the F.B.I., she is, as they put it, ‘going ghost’: moving, changing her name, and essentially wiping away her identity.” The F.B.I. declined to comment on the case. Ms. Norris attracted attention after she published a poster on the Internet in April satirically proposing that people draw figures of the Prophet Muhammad on May 20. She indicated that the proposal was a protest of censorship by Comedy Central, which edited out references to Muhammad from an episode of “South Park” that month. That episode also triggered threats from extremists. Islam forbids depictions of the Prophet Muhammad. In 2005, a Danish cartoonist named Kurt Westergaard published a depiction of Muhammad that led to multiple death threats and alleged assassination attempts. He was presented an award this month for freedom of speech by Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. The poster by Ms. Norris spread on the Internet and spawned Facebook groups both for and against the idea. She quickly tried to tamp down the controversy, apologizing to Muslims and at one point joking that the event should be renamed “Everybody Draw Al Gore Day.” The protest movement continued in the spring largely without her involvement. In July, Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical Yemeni-American cleric who is accused of ties to Al Qaeda, said in a document published on the Internet that Ms. Norris “should be taken as a prime target of assassination,” according to the NEFA Foundation, a private group that monitors extremist Web sites, which translated the document. Mr. Awlaki stated that Ms. Norris and other unnamed people in the United States and Europe “are expressing their hatred of the Messenger of Islam through ridicule.” In a controversial step, the Obama administration this year authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to kill Mr. Awlaki, who is in hiding. Seattle Weekly started to publish cartoons by Ms. Norris about two months ago. Her last cartoon appeared in the Sept. 8 issue. Ms. Norris did not respond to e-mail messages on Thursday. Her personal Web site has been taken offline. Michael Cavna, a writer for Comic Riffs, a Washington Post blog about comics, said that he contacted her on Thursday and that she verified Mr. Fefer’s version of events. Mr. Fefer wrote that Ms. Norris had likened her situation “to cancer — it might basically be nothing, it might be urgent and serious, it might go away and never return, or it might pop up again when she least expects it.” Correction: September 18, 2010 An article on Friday about a Seattle cartoonist who went into hiding after she was threatened by Islamic extremists for promoting an “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” misstated the nationality of Kurt Westergaard, the cartoonist whose depictions of Muhammad in 2005 drew similar threats. He is Danish, not Dutch. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us/17cartoon.html?_r=0 Seattle cartoonist still in hiding four years after Islamic fatwa It’s been four years since Molly Norris left her cartoonist job at the Seattle Weekly and went underground in 2010 after an Islamic extremist put her on a hit list for creating ‘Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.’ BY Nicole Hensley NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Saturday, January 10, 2015, 6:44 PM The horrific massacre of Charlie Hebdo staff is a somber reminder that an American cartoonist has fearfully been in hiding since 2010. Molly Norris, a former cartoonist with the Seattle Weekly, vanished on advice of the FBI after Islamic militant Anwar al-Awlaki put her on a hit list for creating “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.” “She had to completely change her identity, disappear from her work,” Larry Kelley, the founder of the Free Molly Norris Foundation, told KOMO-TV this week. Kelley says Norris is the first American journalist working in the United States to be forced into hiding by “radical Islam.”   [ ... CONTINUES ... ] http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/cartoonist-hiding-islamic-death-threat-article-1.2073298 http://www.timesofisrael.com/decade-on-danish-mohammed-cartoonist-has-no-regrets/ Decade on, Danish Mohammed cartoonist has no regrets Kurt Westergaard, who lives under police protection to this day, says his ‘basic feeling has been and still is anger’ By AFP September 27, 2015, 7:54 am Ten years after a Danish newspaper triggered deadly protests by publishing 12 cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, the man behind the most infamous drawing says he feels anger but no regret. Kurt Westergaard, 80, has received numerous death threats and lives under police protection since his caricature of a swarthy man with a bomb swaddled in his turban was published by daily Jyllands-Posten on September 30, 2005. In 2010 an axe and knife-wielding man broke into his home, forcing him to take refuge in a panic room for 10 minutes as his attacker pounded on the door, while his five-year-old granddaughter was left alone in the living room. “My basic feeling has been and still is anger. If you are threatened I think anger is a good feeling because it is like you mentally strike back,” he told AFP in a telephone interview. [ ... CONTINUES ... ] http://www.timesofisrael.com/decade-on-danish-mohammed-cartoonist-has-no-regrets/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Angela Merkel's hypocrisy and European borders open to rape and terrorism stupidity knowns no bounds. Although Merkel is the focal point, this is a NATO-allied (official and unofficial -- eg Sweden) standard practice  in Western Europe and, to a lesser extent (I believe), also in the former British European colonies. Meanwhile, Germany's government has: 1.  harassed, politically persecuted and imprisoned a number of native Germans who question or otherwise challenge (even academically), state-enforced historical narrative of WWII events; 2.  harassed persons who otherwise seek to exercise freedom of expression and political freedom in Germany; 3. 'legally' denied the right of legal defence to right leaning thinkers; 4. harassed (and imprisoned) legal defence of those accused of 'constitutional crimes' ... which is pretty much state-made suppression laws of the defeated-in-war & still not a sovereign nation kind, I would say; 5. legally harasses Germans who do not even live in Germany, by seeking extradition to Germany for thought and speech POLITICAL SUPPRESSION targeted State 'crimes'. For a suppressive (& nominally sovereign) state such as Germany to hand out a 'freedom of speech' award is farcical.   In following policy in favour of ongoing and exponentially increasing influx of non-European immigration from regions prone to produce religious zealotry and political resistance of the terror attack kind, Germany (along with Western Europe and the West in general) is instrumental in SHUTTING DOWN freedom of speech and other Western freedoms in a variety of ways. The dismantling of Western freedoms and dismantling of European culture and society by Western states, even  as such states publicly praise Western 'freedoms' and ideology, while claiming to defend same from radical Islam, is as farcical as Germany handing out a freedom of speech award. Western Police State Imposing 'speech laws', imposing mass surveillance, imposing political police spy-infiltration of right-leaning activist political movements and/or parties, suppressing European nationalism and culture (while institutionally recognising alien/foreign identity, culture etc), imposing targeted state spying for censorship purposes (eg on social media) and censoring Germans who dissent on Facebook (with Facebook cooperation), for example, is just some of the surveillance, intrusion, political suppression, and violation of freedoms that routinely take place in the West, due, to a large extent, to a policy of permitting what amounts to hostile foreign invasion while simultaneously (a) exposing domestic populations to existential threat (of several types - displacement, ethnic dilution, political emasculation, and eventual genocide (slow or fast), along with more obvious and immediate dangers -- eg terror attacks, race riots etc); and (b) suppressing inevitable and legitimate complaint/dissent. Who in their right mind wants to live in a society where film-makers are butchered in the street, and artists/cartoonists are forced to go into hiding in their homelands because of threat from foreigners? The liberal 'left' universalist ideologically-possessed, saviour-fascist, rent-a-protest neocon colonialism shilling brigade is insane. Even so, I felt sorry for this guy getting extra-judicially droned by the CIA (and probably even more outraged) that he couldn't even buy sex in peace, without getting repeatedly harassed by the state and forced to submit to state punishments for it (in the 'free' West): 1996 al-Awlaki arrested in San Diego charged with soliciting prostitutes pled lesser fined $400 required to attend informational sessions on AIDS 1997 al-Awlaki arrested in San Diego charged with soliciting prostitutes pled guilty fined $240 ordered to perform 12 days of community service received x3 years' probation Nov 2001 to Jan 2002 FBI observed him visiting a number of prostitutes interviewed them established he had paid for sex acts No prosecution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki  but when I read what he said about the cartoonist that reportedly went into hiding, basically encouraging religious extremists to kill her, I felt really angry and not at all sorry he'd been droned. But I can't help wondering whether the 'disappearing' cartoonist is real or maybe a limited hangout thingy, aimed to swing public opinion in favour of extra-judical drone attacks in the US?  Or is that too far-fetched?  lol Maybe the cartoon 'psyop' idea is too far-fetched, because there's footage of some religious extremist guy in the US carrying out an ambush shooting of a policeman the other day in Philadelphia - here. Whatever it was, there is definitely artists in hiding in Europe, where the negligent politicians have been pretending the last decade that this isn't happening. Of course, the threat is not limited to artists, but the Western European politicians, media and other intelligentsia refuse to recognise and name this threat.   And, no, it's not 'radicalisation':  it's non-European immigration. Obviously, the politicians serve transnational agendas, without a care for their own people:  their polices never shift to what is logical and beneficial for their own kind. ꕤ