Death of Former Australian Diplomat Peter Henderson

ministry of tokyo AUSTRALIA http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/public-service/canberra-loses-its-scourge-of-public-service-yes-men-20160926-grp6hj.html Canberra loses its scourge of public service 'yes men' Noel Towell Former Foreign Affairs Department boss Peter Henderson, who warned 20 years ago of the rise of the public service "yes men", has died in Canberra aged 87. Michael Ball, an influential Chairman of the National Capital Authority in the 2000s, also died on the weekend [IMAGE] Heather and Peter Henderson stand with her parents, Dame Pattie and Sir Robert Menzies, in a London garden in the late 1960s, soon after Sir Robert's retirement as Prime Minister. Mr Henderson, who was married to Sir Robert Menzies' daughter Heather, had an eventful career which included being sacked by Bill Hayden as departmental secretary and successfully suing another Labor figure who used parliamentary privilege to launch an attack on the former DFAT secretary's integrity. He led the then Department of Foreign Affairs from 1979 until 1984. The career diplomat, who led the then Department of Foreign Affairs from 1979 until 1984, was born into a Goulburn grazing family and served in a variety of foreign postings including Washington, Jakarta, Geneva, London and was head of mission in Manila in the days of husband-and-wife dictatorship duo Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos. He disliked imperial honours and radically changed staffing arrangements at Australia House in London to stop British-based staff looking at Australian-Eyes-Only material, and resisted pressure to make blatantly political appointments to plum diplomatic roles. In his memoir, Privilege and Pleasure, Mr Henderson recounts how he baulked at one such attempt by then Labour Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Hayden. "Neither Street, nor Peacock, nor Hayden until this time, ever made an appointment as unacceptable on professional grounds as this one," Mr Henderson said later. When Hayden sacked Mr Henderson from his secretary's role in May 1984 in what is remembered as a spiteful effort, the minister insisted that it had nothing to do with Mr Henderson's connection to the Menzies family. Mr Henderson never believed him. After his "involuntary retirement," from the public service in 1985 Mr Henderson kept up an informed commentary on the state of the Commonwealth administration. In 1987, he offered a prescient warning of "an increasing tendency towards the politicisation of senior ranks in the Commonwealth Public Service". "If preferment is increasingly given to sycophants and yes men, and if people are increasingly pushed aside or discarded because they are known or suspected not to subscribe to the views of their political masters, the professionalism and quality of the public service as a whole can only suffer." Mr and Mrs Henderson had four daughters, 11 grandchildren and three great grandchildren. Mr Ball, a real-life Madison Avenue "mad man", who later devoted his life to public service, served as the National Capital Authority's chairman from 2006 until 2008 when he quit in protest to the newly elected Rudd government slashing the authority's staff and funding. Mr Ball described the cuts as barbaric and lamented the loss of "Camelot", his name for an organisation with what he described as talented staff, money and vision for the national capital. The former ad-man won widespread respect for his passion and advocacy for Canberra. He died in Melbourne at the weekend, aged 80, after a long illness. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/public-service/canberra-loses-its-scourge-of-public-service-yes-men-20160926-grp6hj.html Edit From Trove Scan 31 January 1985 The Canberra Times http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/122481121 Former FA head condemns 'dumping' The former Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs, Mr Peter Henderson, criticised successive Australian governments yesterday for using the diplomatic service as a dumping ground. And he said the view expressed last week by Australia's Ambassador to UNESCO, Mr Gough Whitlam, that the US diplomatic service was handicapped by amateurs, applied also in some cases to Australia. "The overseas service has been used as a depository for years by governments of all persuasions for people they want to get rid of in Canberra, and that I object to very much," Mr Henderson said. Mr Henderson, who was with Foreign Affairs for 33 years, five of them as permanent head, left the Public Service last week after being offered the choice of a demotion or retirement. He said he had been disappointed not to be offered the post of Ambassador to Washington, the most senior diplomatic posting. "It wasn't as if I was being unduly presumptuous," he said. "The three people who were head of Foreign Affairs before me went to Washington. I don't think it was out of order for me to think I might be offered the same job." The present Ambassador, Fraser Government appointee Sir Robert Cotton, is due to return soon, and it is believed he will be succeeded by a career diplomat. Likely prospects are understood to include the outgoing Ambassador to Indonesia, Mr Rawdon Dalrymple, the Ambassador to the United Nations, Mr Richard Woolcott, the head of the department's executive, policy planning, defence and nuclear division, MrDuncan Campbell, and the deputy secretary, Mr Geoff Miller. All four were considered candidates to succeed Mr Henderson as Secretary when he stood aside in September, but the job went to an academic, Professor Stuart Harris. Mr Henderson, 56, son-in-law of the late Sir Robert Menzies, finally left the Public Service last Friday, the day before he was named a Companion in the general division of the Order of Australia in the Australia Day honours list. Under the Government's recently introduced "involuntary retirement" regulations, he received $52,700 - the equivalent of two months' pay for each year of service until he turns 60 - in addition to the usual superannuation benefits and pay in lieu of accrued leave. Mr Henderson said yesterday that he had been faced with a choice of accepting an overseas posting, which he declined to name but which he said he had not been particularly attracted to, or staying on and working in Australia. "I chose not to go to the post that was offered to me and, as to working in Australia, the choice lay between going down to the senior executive service or leaving as an involuntary retiree with $52,000," he said."I would prefer to leave and try to do something else than go and work in some lesser capacity in the Public Service." Government sources maintained yesterday that the normal processes for department heads were followed when Mr Henderson was placed on the unattached list. He had been offered a number of senior diplomatic appointments, including Ottawa, which would have enabled him also to retain the salary of a department head, but had declined. The sources said the situation was not a question of Mr Henderson choosing either involuntary retirement or downgrading. Being over the age of 55, he could have chosen to retire in the usual way, but the involuntary retirement provisions carried with them additional benefits and provided a more advantageous way to go. The fact that previous heads of Foreign Affairs had been appointed to Washington did not mean that all subsequent heads were entitled to that appointment. Such appointments were a decision for the Government. Mr Henderson chose not to comment yesterday on the present direction of Australian foreign policy saying he did not think it right "for public servants who have been right in the thick of it to make comments on Wednesday when they were on the payroll last Friday". But he recalled the remarks by Mr Whitlam to the effect that the American diplomatic service was handicapped by having amateurs at the top. Asked if he believed the same was true of the Australian service, Mr Henderson said, "I think there are cases when that has happened with us - yes. He would say no more about any future job save that some people had talked to him but he had made no commitment of any kind. I wouldn't feel free to comment until some further arrangements have been made." he said. http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/122481121 In Brief Peter Graham Faithfull Henderson retired Australian senior public servant 1979 – 1984 Secretary Dept. of Foreign Affairs & Trade (DFAT) b. 1928 in Goulburn  - to grazing family d. Sept. 2016 educated University of Oxford married daughter of PM Robert Mezies 1956 - in Jakarta 1984 May 1984, appears to have Henderson considered himself 'sacked' by Bill Hayden as departmental secretary. Henderson was offered choice of demotion or retirement. DENOUNCED Aust. govt for using diplomatic service as: "depository... for people they want to get rid of in Canberra" reportedly pressured by Labour Foreign Affairs Minister Bill Hayden (Labor Party) to make political appointments to "plum diplomatic roles" Hayden Min. Foreign Affairs & Trade under PM Bob Hawke 1983-1988 (earlier, Treasurer under Gough Whitlam 1975) Henderson: successfully sued another Labor figure re use of parliamentary privilege "to launch an attack on the former DFAT secretary's integrity" [1] Memoir:  'Privilege and Pleasure' Quotes: 1987: "an increasing tendency towards the politicisation of senior ranks in the Commonwealth Public Service" [1] "If preferment is increasingly given to sycophants and yes men, and if people are increasingly pushed aside or discarded because they are known or suspected not to subscribe to the views of their political masters, the professionalism and quality of the public service as a whole can only suffer." [1] Awards 1985, Henderson - Companion of the Order of Australia (distinguished public service) [2] [1] http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/public-service/canberra-loses-its-scourge-of-public-service-yes-men-20160926-grp6hj.html [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Henderson_%28Australian_public_servant%29 National Capital Authority (NCA) body of Aust. govt. established to manage Commonwealth's interest in planning & development of Canberra as capital various bodies preceding NCA listed ~ commenced:  1921 ~ 1930- 1938 no body in existence ~ predecessor:  FCAC oversaw construction of Canberra from 1921 - 1924 ~ cttee chaired by Aust. architect John Sulman ~ much development 1925–1930 (FCC) ~ Chief Commissioner John Butters ~ to prepare Canberra for arrival of 1,100 civil servants & families ~ completion of following 1925-1927:     - Parliament House     - The Lodge     - Albert Hall     - Institute of Anatomy     - Aust. School of Forestry     - Observatory, Mt Stromlo     - construction of Sydney & Melb. commercial buildings, + residential development ~ disabled 1930:  after start of Great Depression 1929 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Capital_Authority Quite like ...  House at 11 La Perouse Street, Griffith, Canberra, ACT built in the 1920s illustrates architectural style of the Federal Capital Commission Calthorpes' House built 1927, ACT built in 1927 by Harry Calthorpe, stock and station agent Spanish Mission style former Canberra High School (now the ANU School of Art) COMMENT Looks like there was a massive post WWI development push in Australia, that was then put on pause by the Depression and what I assumed is preparation for WWII, between: 1930-1938. As there is a body during the WWII period and thereafter: 1938–1957 (National Capital Planning and Development Committee (NCPDC)), it looks as though the Australians were confident of a US-Anglo allied capitalists win. With the massive US-Anglo capitalist forces marshalled and sent to invade European soil (comprising an eventual 1 million allied foreigners on the Western European front in WWII), I guess there was perhaps reason to be confident. The buildings I like best are circa the 1920s and 1930s. Interesting comment about the state of the American capitalist diplomatic service of the day.  Obama's known for assigning political postings to his bundlers (electoral campaign fund-raisers), so at least part of the US diplomatic service must still be rather lame.

Australia: Terrorism or Totalitarianism?

CAPITALIST RULE AUSSIES CONDEMNED BY DECADES of FVEY coterie CAPITALIST PROGRAM OF POPULATION TRANSFER aimed at:  DISMANTLING OF ANGO-AUSTRALIA in step with agenda of ruling US-ANGLO CAPITALIST EMPIRE CONDEMNED TO ENDURE 1.  TERRORISM. or 2.  TOTALITARIANISM.  So ... which would you rather?  LOL Don't know why I find that funny, but I do.  Even though I'm terrified sometimes. It's hard to say what I'm more terrified of:  the potential of being random victim of politically motivated terrorism, or just your run of the mill everyday terrorism by hammer or machete wielding African gangs, committing violent dawn home invasions in packs, or committing carjackings, or committing tram hijackings, FFS.   Well done, Australia.  Nothing like interracial gang home invasion to look forward to.   Judging from the level of anger I'm feeling thinking about this right now, I'd say I'm more pissed about the gangs than I am about potential jihadis ... although I'm not real keen on the prospect of an encounter with the latter. The actual existence of international treaties for assigning rights to alien invaders is about as ridiculous as having to chose between terrorism and totalitarianism.   Where are the rights of the now stateless Europeans in all of this?   Yes, stateless.  Not a single European society has escaped from this criminal capitalist destruction. Dr. Binoy Kampmark Detained for Terror: Proposed Indefinite Detention Laws in Australia By Dr. Binoy Kampmark Global Research, August 08, 2016 Url of this article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/detained-for-terror-proposed-indefinite-detention-laws-in-australia/5540179 The reactive dimension of global politics – at least at the level of many states – is a broader statement about how far things have rotted.  Nothing is more reactive than a State’s response to terrorism, actual or perceived.  The pure evidentiary dimension is neglected in favour of procedural fluff and unmeasurable contingencies. The box-ticking bureaucrat takes precedence over the judicial officer. The Turnbull government has come down rather heavily in its response to a spate of attacks in France and Germany, deciding that it is time that something be done in the face of this supposed global madness.  The prime minister Malcolm Turnbull decided to press the issue in a letter to state leaders urging for the creation of a national regime to indefinitely detain terrorists even after the point of serving their sentence. Civil liberties lawyer Greg Barnes has made the point that such assessments are fundamentally specious. They lack coherence, dimension and remain presumptuous.  The chances, therefore, of a person locked up for years on terrorist charges then engaging in acts of murderous mayhem on leaving, did not compute.  [comment:  I'd have to argue against Barnes on this.  Being locked up for years on terrorist charges may (or may not) be motive for acts of vengeance.  How likely that is, is impossible to say.  Most people would probably want to get on with what is left of their lives.  But you just don't know.  Who wants to take a chance?  On the other hand, who wants to incarcerate indefinitely and likely unjustly?  Again, this impossible choice is brought to you by INSANE POLICIES.  ] The point is an ominous one for at least 13 prisoners convicted over what has been said to be Australia’s largest terrorism plot in New South Wales and Victoria.  After concluding their sentences, the individuals involved in the Pendennis network, led by Melbourne cleric Abdul Benbrika, would have little guarantee of release.  [comment:  wow, I didn't even know Australia had its own terrorist cell.  I tend not to follow much Australian news.   It annoys me more than other kind of news, so I sidestep it normally.  ] Buttering in the face of such extralegal nonsense is always deemed necessary.  The Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis explained over the weekend that, “All of the attorneys, as the first law officers of our respective jurisdictions, understand the gravity of the threat that terrorism poses to Australia and its people.”[1] What Brandis fails to mention is that such officers also owe it to the legal profession, its servants and the citizens of a country, to reassuringly ensure that liberties are not unduly tarnished, let alone entirely abandoned, as is being suggested by these measures.  The insolence of office, one so gleefully embraced, comes to mind. With that merry insolence, the views of such officers are indifferent to habeas corpus, and the notion that a person who does time has (and here is a novelty), actually discharged the burdens placed upon him for such offences. Terrorism is simply being rendered, rather nonsensically, exceptional, an offence that demands special treatment.  [comment:  the problem is that politically motivated terrorism *is* exceptional.  Thanks again, politicians and liberal assh*les.  ] If detention were to be infinite, the hierarchy of punishment would have to be abandoned in favour of an arbitrary notion of convict and permanently incarcerate if you can.  This would effectively eliminate the notion of sentencing as having any value bringing, instead, the fictional notion of a hypothetical terrorist attack to the fray.  [comment:  this is a hard one.  Nobody wants to be the cuck that leaves themselves open to terrorism.  Oh, wait.  The horse has already f*cking bolted because these Aussie cucks have done just that.  Now it's a choice of terrorism (or potential terrorism) or totalitarianism.   What's it gonna be?] Instead of expressing outrage at the heavy-handed, not to mention clumsy approach of the Commonwealth government, the NSW Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton, congratulated Turnbull “on this initiative.  The stakes are high for NSW: make no mistake.  We have more people in our prisons than any other state that would be subject to these laws.”[2]  All the more reason, one would have thought, for not endorsing such regulations.  [comment:  OMG.  Sydney is Terrorist Central. ] Upton’s shoddy reasoning pivots on mere words: “terrorism” qualifies for blanket imprisonment and detention.  Terrorism posed such a risk to the community it meant that no one could be “complacent”. The situation becomes even more peculiar given the observations by such individuals a Greg Moriarty, national counter-terrorism coordinator and evidently self-proclaimed amateur penologist.  All agencies in the business of “national counter-terrorism” were “committed to preventing people from becoming terrorists; to disrupting and diverting people who are heading down a path towards violent extremism; and to rehabilitating people who are convicted for terrorism offences.” But for all such noble ventures, there would always be those eggs that would stay rotten, where it was “not possible, or where there are significant areas of doubt”.  This mealy-mouthed assertion is a neat illustration about executive paranoia, enabling people to be detained at the pleasure of the sovereign.  [comment:  where can people go to escape this ugly bind?  There is nowhere among European civilisation that this has not been replicated by the assh*le nation destroying capitalists. ] In Australia’s legal soil, noxious precedents flower that enable the Attorney-Generals at all levels of government to push for an agenda hostile to the detainee.  In mental health administration, there are those permanently kept away from trial (and hence a genuine testing of their cases) for reasons of psychic disturbance. [comment:  this gets worse and worse.  Again, what do you do?  Let disturbed ppl into the community or let potential terrorists into the community ... Oh, wait.  They have.  Assh*les. ] The High Court has also done its bit to add to the regulatory framework of indefinite detention by arguing that stateless individuals can be indefinitely kept at the discretion of the State, a sort of administrative purgatory where risk from the detainee might manifest.   The case of Ahmed Al-Kateb remains something of a nightmare in that regard, an outcome premised on the shallow notion that non-judicial detention is entirely permissible provided it be for the purposes of removal.[3]  [comment:  thank f*ck the High Court is arguing in favour of something sensible.  What else are you supposed to do, in the circumstances?  Non-judicial purposes of removal sounds good to me.  ] There was just one problem for Al-Kateb: his argument that any detention could not be lawful if it has ceased to have a valid basis for removal from Australia was dismissed with more than a bit of contempt.  [comment:  being convicted of terrorist plotting sounds like a good start to a 'valid basis' for removal to me.  I'd add rape, home invasion, carjacking and more to that list of everyday terrorism. ] There are also those deemed genuine refugees under the United Nations Refugee Convention who are not permitted out of Australia’s brutal detention regime because they have been assessed, courtesy of the domestic espionage network ASIO, as a security risk.  All that, despite having no formal charges level.  The proposed change by Turnbull, to that end, remains dangerously, and lamentably consistent with enlarged and unaccountable executive power.   [comment:  thank f*ck for ASIO.   Who gives a sh*t about 'formal charges', invader rights and the status of those seeking to invade under illegitimate international treaty.  Only a suicidal liberal cuck would give a sh*t about technicalities of the fraud that is the nation destroying post WWII 'human rights' rort.   ] Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.  Email: bkampmark@gmail.com Notes [1] http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2016/s4514207.htm?site=darwin [2] http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2016/s4514207.htm?site=darwin [3] http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/37.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=al-kateb Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Copyright © Dr. Binoy Kampmark, Global Research, 2016 These were the initial feelings on the topic. But embracing totalitarianism in exchange for safety is signing up to be subject to the same totalitarian controls (and potential abuses). It's a no win.

Australia - 'Permanent Resident' Refugee Charged With 4 Counts of Rape, Bailed

Australia - 'Permanent Resident' Refugee Charged With 4 Counts of Rape, Bailed http://www.skynews.com.au/news/national/qld/2016/07/23/refugee-bailed-for-alleged-tinder-date-rape.html   Refugee bailed for alleged Tinder date rape Published: 2:05 pm, Saturday, 23 July 2016 A former refugee who allegedly raped a woman he met on Tinder has been granted bail. It's alleged the Brisbane man raped the woman last week after meeting her online on Tinder and dating site Plenty of Fish. He has been charged with four counts of rape, all relating to the same incident. Police opposed a bail request from the man, a political refugee from the Middle East who spent two years on Christmas Island before arriving in Australia, on the grounds he was not an Australian citizen and could be a flight risk. But defence lawyer Nic Tobin told Brisbane Magistrates Court the 26-year-old man was a permanent resident and was employed. He also said the four counts of rape against the man related to a 'relatively tenuous consent issue case'. 'Consent will be a real, live issue in this case,' he said. Magistrate Bronwyn Springer granted the man bail and ordered he undergo a disease test. But she decided against imposing a condition that he not access dating sites and apps like Tinder on the grounds that such orders were often 'problematic' and because there was no evidence the man had committed any other offences linked to similar sites.  [comment:  how many women have to complain of getting raped before the 'problematic' condition of stay the f*ck off dating sites and apps is ordered by the piss weak Aussie courts, I wonder? ] The case was adjourned until August 15. AAP http://www.skynews.com.au/news/national/qld/2016/07/23/refugee-bailed-for-alleged-tinder-date-rape.html COMMENT Hey, Australian government ... are you wilfully blind, or do you see a pattern here (and everywhere else around the world), you negligent capitalist serving pricks, continuing to employ illegitimate and destructive post WWII 'human rights' treaties. The f*cking courts are as pathetic as the state.

Australia: Violent African Home Invasions

CRIMINAL Immigration Program https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqmgTBBJXt8&feature=youtu.be Black On White Crime Melbourne, Australia series of violent home invasions by armed Africans attack when occupiers most vulnerable:  asleep 6 Africans:   armed with hammers,  baseball bats & bars smash their way into suburban home https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqmgTBBJXt8&feature=youtu.be Multiple Africans Storm Melbourne Suburban Family Homes, Early Morning Hours https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry1XGxFOfGg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giXRxBeQAeM Elsewhere: Naive Bleeding Heart Do-Gooders Argue Pouring Money Into the Problem is the Solution Funding for 5,000 additional youth workers across the suburbs sought by Les Twentyman foundation for 'at risk' thugs. Never mind the actual at risk Australians and the logic of: immediately revising genocidal immigration program; bringing police under-staffing & under-funding up to date; revising laws to ensure penalties match severity of crimes committed; revising laws to ensure incarceration is as unpleasant as possible; ensuring post-conviction and incarceration deportations are swift;  relaxing Australia's gun laws; revising self-defence laws; providing government subsidies for home-owner firearms and other security purchases (shutters, gates, alarms, safe rooms, trained dogs etc). to ensure that the at risk Australian public is protected and may protect themselves and their property.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_kiXSIOoCM Sporting Shooters Association of Australia (SSAA) join SSAA do test 1.5 month firearms licence 6 weeks to purchase firearm Marlin 3030 Model 336W microgroove barrel - great pig gun cheap but sturdy good rifle array of bullets flat bullet, good for mushrooming up range:  150 metres / dinner-plate target, no worries (or longer) 9 bullets held on butt plus 6 = 15 bullets source *Great ... Australia is in the stone age and has no semi-automatics.  This one one looks nice ...  Colt 1911 "Rail Gun" 22.lr Pistol 10-shot magazine (Sports Shooter) (or 12-shot magazine Cat H Licence) skeletonised trigger fitting for light combat hammer sight dots *must grip handle & pull trigger & hammer will come forward additional safety leaver to rear big on safety features after last shot, slide will open to rear barrel is 5 inches heaviness of trigger pulling is frustrating (abt. 6 pounds, fairly heavy / x3 the weight of pull wanted) does lighten up with more use can take to gunsmith to have trigger lightened up masses of 1911 parts are replaceable not fussy with ammunition standard or high OK will shoot hyper-velocity ammo around - $800 mark *I'm not so big on all those safety features, but you probably get accustomed to those? COMMENT I don't have words for how angry I feel seeing this. If I knew where to buy a gun, I would buy one this minute. The MO appears to be: striking when occupants likely to be asleep entry by smashing way in entry by multiple points

Australia - Victoria - Third World Mayhem

Victoria, Australia THIRD WORLD MAYHEM [Source | Video] Victoria:  Authorise the Police to Shoot NAH, THE INHERENT DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN SOCIETIES & THREAT TO VITAL INTERESTS & SAFETY OF EUROPEANS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN THE 'INHERENT RACISM' OF DEPORTATION & RESISTANCE TO EUROPEAN DESTRUCTION ... NO CONSEQUENCES NO FEAR Shadow Attorney General, John Pesutto Police Association Victoria Secretary, Ron Iddles   3AW (below)       [Source | 3AW] [Source | plus Petition] archive POLICE RETREAT, POINT COOK VIC. TOOK RIOT SQUAD 40 MINUTES TO ARRIVE [Source] WHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT CANNOT HELP, IT'S EVERY MAN FOR HIMSELF RELAX THE GUN LAWS & LAWS RELATED TO SELF-DEFENCE Capitalists and their intelligentsia immigration shills have destroyed another country.  A country that was probably once the safest there was on this planet. Police are warning home-owners not to arm themselves and therefore not to defend themselves against out of control African home invasion and violence, where the public are sitting ducks, and the police have been under-funded and are under staffed by 15 years in Victoria, thanks to the same scumbag politicians that implement the enforced invasion program. In addition, there is NO LEGAL CONSEQUENCE FOR TERRORISM COMMITTED BY AFRICAN GANGS. Sentencing is light; offenders have nice holidays in juvie, if convicted; uppermost home invasion tariff is grossly disproportionate for the nature of the crime (couple of years of being treated with the utmost of care in an Aussie taxpayer funded hotel); offenders dealt with leniently & given 'warnings'; offenders not afraid of consequences and certainly have no fear of the police. Thirty-five years of hard labour and confinement in a prison like maybe you'd find in Turkey, followed by prompt deportation, would soon put a stop to this terrorism.   No, I'm not kidding.  Nobody should have to wake up to the living nightmare that is a violent invasion by African terrorists in their own home, let alone ordinary suburban people with no guns and no combat experience to rely upon to handle this menace. Thanks for nothing, Australian capitalist and Australian politician assh*les.  That goes for you, too, Champagne socialists, unions, lefties, human rights lawyers, universalist 'humanitarian' wankers, churchies, academics, the filthy capitalist media and the equally filthy shilling Australian intelligentsia.  F*ck you, all. What are people supposed to do?  Europeans who aren't predisposed or otherwise equipped to deal with the chaos the Australian government has imported. Where are people supposed to move to? The entire country is now f*cked. It doesn't get any more f*cked than not feeling at ease in one's own home ... in one's car, going to work, heading home from work, at the shops, at work (if you happen to be in retail etc), at the shops, anywhere f*cking public and, basically, anywhere on the streets, in parks, at the beach — wherever.  Oh, and the likelihood is you will be hit by terrorist African home invaders when you are asleep, so good luck preparing for that. So there is NO ESCAPE from this — at all — ever.  Like Manuel Vall says in France:  get used to the terrorism, Australia, because there is no f*cking end to it now. Middle-aged European women shouldn't have to ponder how to effectively use a cricket bat to stop an African gang home invasion. I can't f*cking believe this nightmare. It is as if I have died and gone to f*cking hell. How can people be subjected to this without their consent? Comrade Kim Jong-Un isn't filling his country with third world violent assault, machete tram hijackings, robbery that comes with beatings just for fun, car-jackings, home invasions and street violence. Seriously.  Go. F*ck.  Yourselves.  I wish I was North Korean.  GENOCIDE POLICY The Western capitalist government FVEY coterie of capitalist mass surveillance criminals (& occupied or subverted 'friends') UNIFORM LONG-STANDING EUROPEAN GENOCIDE INVASION POLICY is a f*cking CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY. UNDEMOCRATIC AUSTRALIAN JOURNALIST POLITICALLY PERSECUTED DETAINED 5.5 YEARS, WITHOUT CHARGE No Longer A Safe Country NIGHTMARE BROUGHT TO YOU BY CAPITALISM ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, MALVERN ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, MALVERN ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, BRIGHTON ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, DANDY ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT,VIC POLICE ENJOY THE CULTURAL ENRICHMENT, POINT COOK VICTORIAN MOTHER KILLED Of course, f*cking media is not taking comments from the politically suppressed and invaded Europeans being terrorised and murdered  ... SOURCE | Daily Mail BAIL AFTER 14 ARMED ROBBERIES

Iraq Invasion 2003 - Aussies US-Anglo Capitalist Puppets

US-ANGLO CAPITALIST AUSSIE PUPPETS IRAQ INVASION 2003 CHILCOT REPORT WAR CRIMINALS https://youtu.be/HP55OMZbM6Y Press TV (Mahi Ramakrishnan) - LINK | Source "The judges in the verdict said that that the United States, under the leadership of Bush, forged documents to claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction." "“Bush and Blair are found guilty under the same law that applied to the Nazis after the end of the World War II. So, they are international (war) criminals guilty of Nuremberg crimes against peace; and they should be prosecuted by any state in the world that gets a hold of them." Press TV (Mahi Ramakrishnan) LINK | Source COMMENT US Capitalist Empire has taken steps IN ADVANCE to ensure that no country dare prosecute the AMERICAN-ANGLO CAPITALIST WAR CRIMINALS (or their associates), as US Capitalist Empire has given itself permission to wage war against those that seek to bring US CAPITALIST WAR CRIMINALS to justice. Hague Invasion Act Human Rights Watch | 2002  http://archive.is/OXr7k "A new law supposedly protecting U.S. servicemembers from the International Criminal Court shows that the Bush administration will stop at nothing in its campaign against the court. U.S. President George Bush today signed into law the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, which is intended to intimidate countries that ratify the treaty for the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the "Hague invasion clause," has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.  In addition, the law provides for the withdrawal of U.S. military assistance from countries ratifying the ICC treaty, and restricts U.S. participation in United Nations peacekeeping unless the United States obtains immunity from prosecution. At the same time, these provisions can be waived by the president on "national interest" grounds.  ... The law is part of a multi-pronged U.S. effort against the International Criminal Court. On May 6, in an unprecedented move, the Bush administration announced it was "renouncing" U.S. signature on the treaty. " Human Rights Watch | 2002  http://archive.is/OXr7k Press TV Thu Jul 7, 2016 6:2AM A former Australian army chief has warned Canberra against “blindly” following the United States in the American military adventures, a day after a long-awaited inquiry into Britain’s role in the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq blamed the UK for rushing to war. “We... need to be careful of blindly going along with our senior strategic partners,” Peter Leahy, who was the chief of the Australian army from 2002 to 2008, said in an apparent reference to the US. “I think as we look at other issues that are afoot at the moment, there are some thoughts to be given there — what decisions are we making?” he said, speaking on Thursday. The former army chief, who is now a professor at Canberra University’s National Security Institute, added that “Frankly, some of the decisions the United States, our senior partner in our strategic alliance, have [sic] made over the last 20 or 30 years have been a bit crook.” The Chilcot Inquiry, established in 2009 to investigate Britain’s most controversial military engagement since the end of the Second World War, published its 6,000-page report in 12 volumes on Wednesday, slamming former British Prime Minister Tony Blair over support for former US President George W. Bush in the 2003 Iraq war. At the time, Blair presented the case for war with “a certainty which was not justified” based on “flawed” intelligence about Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which was not challenged as it should have been, the report concluded. Blair’s government sent 120,000 members of the British armed forces and civilians to Iraq, proving its role as Bush’s chief military ally.  A total of 179 British personnel were killed in the war. In 2003, Australia also sent 2,000 troops to support the US and British forces in the invasion of Iraq, whose legal basis, according to the Chilcot Inquiry, was “far from satisfactory.” According to Leahy, a review of the Australian involvement in the Iraq war released in 2004 also showed that Canberra relied on flawed advice in joining its senior allies. “Let’s have a discussion, not an inquiry, around our relationship with the United States, how we decide to go to war and very importantly how we decide every day when we are at war to stay at war,” Leahy said. Meanwhile, Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, who at the time of the Iraq invasion was part of then-Prime Minister John Howard’s conservative government, defended the decision made by the government to send troops to Iraq, saying it was “based on… the best information that we had at the time.” “The government takes responsibility for all decisions that a government makes and we take responsibility for this one,” she further said, describing the decision as “a bipartisan position up to a point.” Blair himself has defended the British decision to follow in the US’s footsteps into Iraq following the publication of the Chilcot report. According to the Australian constitution, the government does not require a permission from the country’s parliament to declare war. http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/07/07/473989/Australia-Peter-Leahy-Iraq-War-US-Chilcot-Inquiry 2011 - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia War Crimes Tribunal BUSH & BLAIR WAR CRIMINALS tribunal found former US President George W Bush former British PM Tony Blair GUILTY of crimes against humanity LINK | here WikiLeaks | Assange [RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE & 'NEW TAB'] WikiLeaks | Assange FCO & MI6 BRITISH INTELLIGENCE Source | @WikiLeaks FREE ASSANGE SAVE JULIAN ASSANGE Saddam Hussein Iraq government described as: "AN OBSTACLE TO EVERY SINGLE WESTERN OBJECTIVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST" "OUR GOAL IS REGIME CHANGE" "WE HAVE HAD SUCH GOALS BEFORE. WE SUCCEEDED IN THE SOVIET UNION, IN APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA AND IN BELGRADE." "I ASSUME [REGIME CHANGE] REMAINS OUR GOAL IN PLACES LIKE BURMA, IRAN, LIBYA, ZIMBABWE AND LIBERIA." "LAWYERS AND PEACENIKS SHOULD NOT PREVENT US FROM SAYING WHAT WE REALLY WANT IN IRAQ" "IF WE WERE TO BUILD UP THE KURDS AND THE SHIA AS PROXIES, WHAT ASSURANCES WOULD WE HAVE TO GIVE THEM THAT WE WOULD NOT LET THEM DOWN YET AGAIN?" "ALL OF THESE ARE MUCH MORE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS THAN LEGALITY ..." "WE CAN LOOK FOR A LEGAL BASIS ONCE WE HAVE DECIDED WHAT TO DO, AS WE DID IN KOSOVO." "WE KNOW BUSH, AT THE END OF THE DAY, WILL BE BOTH INTELLIGENT AND RESPONSIBLE IF WE CAN HELP THE AMERICANS COME UP WITH A PERSUASIVE PLAN TO OUST THE WORLDS WORST TYRANT, THEN WE SHOULD DO SO. AND IF THE BEST MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE ORGANS OF LONDON AND WASHINGTON FAIL TO PRODUCE A CONVINCING PLAN, THEN WE STICK TO CONTAINMENT." SIGNED: JOHN SAWERS SENT BY CAIRO ON 21-02-2002 09:52 RECEIVED BY NO 10 ON 21-02-2002 22:07 http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/media/210163/2002-02-21-teleletter-sawers-to-jay-iraq-policy.pdf John Sawers descendant of Norman invaders (12th C.) former British Diplomat former British Senior Civil Servant Foreign & Commonwealth Office 1997 MI6 agent in Yemen & Syria Political Officer, Damascus 1982 FCO Desk Officer, European Union Dept. 1984 Private Sec. to Minister of State 1986 FCO, Pretoria, Cape Town, South Africa 1988-1991 Head of European Union Presidency Planning Unit 1991 Principal Private Secretary to Douglas Hurd 1993:     - Bosnia War     - Middle East war     - European Union debate International Fellow at Harvard University, USA, 1995-1998 British Embassy, Washington DC, headed Foreign & Defence Policy Team Foreign Affairs Adviser to PM Tony Blair 1999-2001     - Kosovo War     - Northern Ireland peace process     - Iraq sanctions policy Ambassador to Egypt 2001 - 2003 British Special Representatives to Baghdad (3 mths) FCO, Director Gen. for Political Affairs 2003 wide scope, negotiations with:   G8, EU and the UN closely involved re policy on: Iran Iraq Afghanistan Balkans British Permanent Representative to the United Nations 2007-2009 former Chief of MI6, Secret Intelligence Service 2009-2014 governor of the Ditchley Foundation, Anglo-US capitalist relations promo Ditchley Foundation est. 1958 by Sir David Wills, descendant of the tobacco importing family, W. D. & H. O. Wills (Bristol) W.D. & H.O. Wills, est. 1786 one of founding companies of:   Imperial Tobacco on merger of W.D. & H.O. Wills & x7 other tobacco companies key:  William Wills, 1st Baron Winterstoke businessman, Liberal politician JOHN SAWERS, MI6 WikiLeaks | Assange Chilcot Report Rigging Plan Source | @WikiLeaks COMMENT Julie Bishop defending the decision to enter into ILLEGAL WAR ON IRAQ, on a CONCOCTED basis, for the enrichment of US-ANGLO CAPITALISTS who destroyed and robbed the country, is appalling. But what else can the government do?  It's not like they're going to admit to being war criminals and admit liability, are they?  LOL It also sounds like Australia might want to address the issue of the constitution that permits a declaration of war without parliamentary backing. SAVE JULIAN ASSANGE WikiLeaks | Assange @WikiLeaks AUSSIE SUPPORTER DICK SMITH | AUDIO Dick Smith Takes On Sweden & US Empire LINK | here