TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Hamas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hamas. Show all posts

December 28, 2015

Modern History - Israel vs. Palestine List

History
Israel vs. Palestine


Israel War of Independence (1947-1949)
Jewish militias vs. Arab militias
turns to war on declaration of independence of Israel
& intervention of several Arab armies
settlement:  1949 Armistice Agreements
signed by Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria
armistice lines:  the Green Line

Reprisal Ops (1950s-1960s)
IDF military ops
response to Arab guerilla incursions
from Syria, Egypt & Jordan
Israel declares:  high 'blood cost' to enemy side
as deterrence from future attacks

Suez Crisis (1956)
Egypt attacked by:  Israel, Britain & France
intention to occupy Sinai Peninsula
& take over Suez Canal
response to Egypt decision to nationalise Suez Canal
(following US-Anglo withdrawal of offer to fund Aswan Dam)


Conclusion:
US & USSR (Soviet Russia) forced Israeli invasion to retreat
Israel reopened Straits of Tiran & pacified southern border

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Six Day War (1967)
Israel vs Egypt, Jordan & Syria

(contributors:  Iraq, Saudi Arab, Kuwait & Algeria)

Conclusion:  territory held by Israel expanded significantly
-->  The Purpose Line
  • West Bank (incl. East Jerusalem) - taken from Jordan
  • Golan Heights - taken from Syria
  • Sinai & Gaza - taken from Egypt
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
War of Attrition (1967-1970)
Egyptians seek to recapture Sinai from Israel
  • Egypt
  • Jordan
  • Syria
  • PLO
  • USSR
ceasefire 1970 - frontiers remain same

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
 
Operation Gift (1968)
29 Dec. 1968
Israeli IDF commandos destroy
  • 12 passenger aircraft
  • 2 cargo planes
at Beirut International Airport
response to attack on:  Israeli Airliner El Al Flight 253
by Palestinian Lebanon-based
militant org:  Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)

29 Dec. 1968
Israeli commandos destroy 14 aircraft #Lebanon
12 passenger aircraft +
2 cargo planes
@ $43.8 million - British insurers would not cover all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Israeli_raid_on_Lebanon
 
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Yom kuppur War (1973)
20-days
  • Arab states coalition
  • led by Egypt & Syria
  • seek to recapture territories
  • seized by Israel 6-Day War (1967)
  • surprise attack
  • Arab forces defeated
  • no significant territorial changes
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Palestinian Insurgency
     - South Lebanon (1971-1982)
    PLO relocated from Jordan to South Lebanon
    base for international ops
    attacks on Galilee, northern Israel
    Galilee
    1948 Arab–Israeli war outcome:
    nearly the whole of Galilee came under Israel control

    large portion of the population fled or was forced to leave
    leaving dozens of entire villages empty

    large Israeli-Arab community remained based in and near the cities:
    Nazareth, Acre, Tamra, Sakhnin, & Shefa-'Amr
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Israel response:  Op Litani (1978)
    first Israel large-scale invasion of Lebanon
    • IDF seek to expel PLO from Lebanon
    • ground & rocket attacks from Lebanon
    • Israel retaliation
    escalation --> leads to:  Lebanon War (1982)
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Lebanon War (1982)
    • IDF invade southern Lebanon to expel PLO
    Israeli response to:

    1.  terror attacks on northern Israel

    2.  assassination attempt
    against Shlomo Argov, Israel to UK ambassador
    assassination attempt by:   Abu Nidal org
    Result:

    1) exclusion of PLO from southern Lebanon

    2) 'Israeli Security Zone' in southern Lebanon
        (ie Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon)

    •     IDF was allied with Christian militias
        Israel eventually withdrew troops, May 2000
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    South Lebanon Conflict (1982-2000)
    20 years of warfare

    Israel IDF
    • + Israel proxy (Lebanese Christian militias)
    • vs. Muslim guerrillas (led by Iran-backed Hezbollah)
    in Israeli occupied southern Lebanon, claimed as 'security zone'
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    First Intifada (1987-1993)
    6 years
    large-scale Palestinian uprising against Israel
    West Bank & Gaza Strip

    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    Second Intifada (2000-2005)
    large-scale Palestinian uprising against Israel

    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    Lebanon War (2006)
    Israeli military op
    • response to abduction x2 Israeli reservists by Hezbollah
    led to wider confrontation

    Hezbollah vs IDF

    UN brokered ceasefire

    thereafter, Israel lifted naval blockade of Lebanon

    result:
    1)  pacification of southern Lebanon
    2)  weakness of Hezbollah (serious casualties)
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
    Gaza War (2008-2009)
    Dec-Jan - 3-week armed conflict

    Israel vs Hamas

    escalation of Israel-Palestine conflict

    rocket fire from Gaza Strip
    Israel response:  Op Cast Lead
    Op Cast Lead:  surprise Israel air-strike on Gaza Strip
    Israel attacked:
    • military targets
    • civilian targets
    • police stations
    • government buildings
    in opening assault
    ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

    2013 - Peaceful Period
    • x50 rockets by Palestine
    • x10 Israel air-strikes
    • x44 Palestinians killed
    • 100 plus Palestinians injured
    • x6  Israel fatalities (x5 West Bank)
    • x44 Israel injuries 
    Israel | Palestine
    6 / 44 deaths
    44 / 100 injuries
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

      Operation Pillar of Defence (2012)
      Israel military offensive on Gaza Strip
      8-day IDF op
      • killing of Ahmed Jabari, chief Hamas
      • launch of large numbers of Hamas rockets
      • IED explosion on Israeli side of tunnel under Israeli Est Bank barrier
      Hamas alleges: 
      • IDF attacks on Gaza civilians in lead-up to op
      Hamas cites: 
      blockade of Gaza Strip & Occupation West Bank & East Jerusalem as reason for rocket attacks

      Hamas fired:
      • over 1,456 rockets into Israel

      Op Pillar of Defence:
      • IDF struck over 1,500 sites in Gaza Strip

      result:
       Israel
      • rockets killed x3 Israeli civilians
      • a home in Kiryat Malachi received a direct hit
      Palestine
      UNHCR report:
      • 174 Palestinians were killed
      • 100s wounded
      • large number of families displaced

      Israeli operation condemned by:
      • Iran
      • Russia
      • Egypt
      • Turkey
      • + several other Arab & Muslim countries
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
      Operation Brother's Keeper
      IDF initiated 11-day op

      in search of x3 kidnapped Israeli teenagers
      • 350 Palestinians arrested
      • arrest of nearly all Hamas West Bank leaders
      • x5 Palestinians killed
      • Hamas denied responsibility for kidnapping
      • suspect confessed
      under Israel Shin Bet (internal security) heavy torture
      ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

      Gaza War (2014)
      Operation Protective Edge (2014)
      Miv'tza Tzuk Eitan
      (lit. Operation Strong Cliff)

      50-day war


      Israel military offensive on Gaza Strip

      lead-up:
      • kidnap & murder x3 Israeli teenagers
      • kidnap & murder of Palestinian teenager
      • increased rocket attacks on Israel by Hamas
      J. J. Goldberg, editor Forward: 
      • Israel military indictment contains no evidence of orders from Hamas
        --> kidnapping organised by lone actors
        assumed that kidnappers planned prisoner swap
        • Israel kills x2 suspects in shoot-out
          • first suspect (lone-acting, member of Hamas)
          • imprisoned - x3 life terms (+ compensation)

            Israel
            targeted destruction of homes
            of Hamas and other militia members
            violates international humanitarian law
            -- > constitute war crimes    [wikipedia]
            ** this is not full extent of the alleged war crimes

            3,700 rockets fired towards Israel

            32 Hamas tunnels destroyed by Israel

            750 Palestinians - alleged Hamas militants & commanders killed by Israel

            2014 Gaza War - COSTS
            • Palestinians killed: 2,139
            • Palestinian children killed: 490
            • Israeli soldiers killed: 64
            • Israeli civilians killed: 6
            • Israeli children killed: 1
            • Palestinians wounded: 11,000
            • Palestinian children wounded: 3,000
            • Gaza residents displaced: Up to 500,000
            • Homes destroyed in Gaza: 20,000
            Source: UN
            via Independent:  Independent
            Other cost:  international aid


            Israel  |  Palestine

            71 dead / 2,193 dead

            ? wounded  / 11,000 wounded

            ? displaced / 500,000 displaced



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Israel



            ---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

            COMMENT

            Most of the above info is as per the Wikipedia entries.

            It's just my summary, in the hope of remembering some of this.

            Figures haven't been double-checked and I've not looked further  into the war crimes issue.




            December 23, 2014

            Israel - Palestine Conflict: Mads Gilbert & Noam Chomsky


            ISRAEL / PALESTINE


            MADS GILBERT


            Talk to Al Jazeera - Mads Gilbert: 

            'People are questioning Israel'

            Mads Gilbert is a convincing voice for Palestine and it's worthwhile taking the time to view this video, which is from the perspective of a medical professional that has long been active in helping people in Palestine.
            Gilbert says that, according to international law, an occupied people have the right to take up arms to defend themselves.  That isn't something the mainstream media makes clear.  In fact, I think that's the first time I've ever heard anybody say that.
            It is also illegal to occupy a people!  Wow, I didn't even know that.
            During this interview, Gilbert calls into question the Israeli narrative of Israel as a people under attack.
            Gilbert goes on to say that the solution is a political one rather than a military one.
            NOAM CHOMSKY

            Which takes me back to another video that I watched about Palestine and Israel - Noam Chomsky's UN speech:


            Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2LNyZ6NNeE

            Noam Chomsky

            at UN (Oct 14th, 2014) 

            "Solutions To The Israel-Palestine Conflict"




            It's worthwhile taking the time to watch the Noam Chomsky video  because he explains the ways in which a political solution has been dodged.

            Watched this video some time ago and summarised some of the points Chomsky made during the first half hour or so of the video.   Summary below:

            Israel-Palestine conflict: general outlines of a diplomatic solution has been clear for at least 40 years.

            Resolution brought before UN 1976 called for two-state settlement internationally recognised border which guarantees rights of both states

            1976 resolution brought to UN by 3 major Arab states -- Egypt, Jordan, Syria ('the Confrontation States')

            1976 UN resolution -- Israel refused to attend the session. Resolution vetoed by US.

            1976 UN Resolution> US veto typically DOUBLE-VETO 
            1) Non-implementation Resolution 
            2) Event vetoed from history ..
            1976 UN Resolution> Israel refusal to attend + US veto of implementation of Resolution (& from history) SET PATTERN SINCE

            1976 UN Resolution> most recent US VETO 2011 #Obama - vetoed implementation 4 official US policy / for opp. to expansion of settlements

            Opposition to expansion of settlements >*expansion* not issue / issue is illegal *settlements* + infrastructure projects

            for long time, overwhelming international consensus in support of a [illegal] settlement along these general lines

            UN pattern set 1976 continues to the present /Israel rejects settlement of terms with unremitting & decisive support of US

            UN pattern set 1976 continues with unremitting & decisive support of US -- military, economic, diplomatic & ideological

            pattern continues with support of US, establishing how conflict viewed & interpreted in US & within US sphere of influence

            pattern> ceasefire, Israel disregards >continues assault on Gaza, incl. continued siege, intermittent violence, settlement &  development.

            pattern> Hamas observe ceasefire until Israel escalation elicits Hamas response >Israel exercises 'mowing the lawn'  [ie military offensive against Palestinians]

            pattern > Israel 'mowing the lawn'  [ie military offensive against Palestinians] > each episode more fierce & destructive than the last -- in a series

            Agreement on Movement & Access Nov 2005, called for crossing between Gaza & Egypt (Rafah)

            2005 Agreement > for export of goods & transit of people , continuous op of crossings between Israel & Gaza 4 import/export + transit of people

            2005 Agreement > called for reduction of obstacles to movement w/in the West Bank, bus & truck convoys between West Bank & Gaza ...

            2005 Agreement > called for the building of a sea port in Gaza, the reopening of airport in Gaza (that Israel had destroyed)

            Terms of 2005 Movement & Access Agreement are essentially terms of successive ceasefires, incl. one reached few weeks ago.

            2005 Agreement timing significant > it was moment of Israel's disengagement from Gaza & removal several thousand Israeli settlers

            2005 Israel disengagement stated goal was the FREEZING of the peace process to prevent establishment of Palestinian state

            2005 Israel disengagement stated goal was to ensure that diplomacy has been removed indefinitely from agenda ...

            Israel-Palestine:'05 Israel disengagement reality:  ruined territory not released for even single day from Israel military grip or occupation

            '05 Israel disengagement stated reality - Israel left behind scorched earth, devastated services & people with no present or future

            2005 Israel disengagement stated reality: settlements were destroyed in an ungenerous move by an unenlightened occupier

            2005 Israel disengagement >occupier continues to control territory kill & harass inhabitants >means of formidable military might

            Oslo Accords established 20 years ago >> Gaza & West Bank are INDIVISIBLE TERRITORIAL UNITY > integrity cannot be broken up

            For 20 years US & Israel dedicated to separating Gaza & West Bank in VIOLATION of the ACCORDS they had ACCEPTED

            Separation of Gaza & West bank look at map explains why: Gaza offers only access to outside world to Palestine.

            if Gaza is separated from the West Bank whatever autonomy it might be granted in West Bank would be imprisoned.

            September. West Bank = Imprisoned; Israel on one side & hostile Jordan (ally of  Israel)  on other and Israel-US Jordan valley takeover

            Israel's slow & steady US-backed policy is to take over Jordan Valley, about 1/3 of West Bank & much of arable land

            Jordan Valley take-over is major geostrategic reason for Israel with US backing INSISTENCE on SEPARATING Gaza & West Bank

            Jan 2006 = first full free election in the Arab world (monitored & recognised) occurred> HAMAS won control of Parliament

            Hamas win election result in 2006 was not what US & Israel wanted

            2006 Hamas win of Parliament good test of US 'democracy promotion' agenda > Fail: Palestine harsh siege instituted US/IS

            following 2006 Hamas win of Parliament, US began to immediately organise a military coup - as per standard US record

            post 2006 election, US organised military coup >> to its shame & discredit, European Union went along with this.

            sounds like the punishment, violence, US arranged coup (accepted by EU) led to Israeli escalation + end to Nov 2005 Agreement

            2007 Hamas committed even greater crime than winning fair election; it pre-empted planned military coup & took over Gaza!

            2007 elected Hamas PREVENTING US-arranged coup is described in West as Hamas taking Gaza over by 'force'.

            Hamas preventing planned & US-arranged military coup against the Hamas elected government led to substantial attacks on Gaza.

            Jan 2008 another. ceasefire reached. Similar to 2005 terms. Israel publicly rejected ceasefire. Hamas observed the ceasefire.

            one-sided ceasefire cont. to Nov 4, 2008 - day of US election - Israeli forces invaded Gaza & killed Hamas militants ...

            Nov 2008 Israel attack on Gaza led 2 rocket fire on Israel, a huge Israeli response, lots killings: Palestinians, as usual

            mid Dec 2008, Hamas offer to renew the ceasefire, Israeli doveish Cabinet rejected & launched next military op 'Cast Lead'

            2008 Israel Op 'Cast Lead' >> horrible Op .. caused substantial international reaction, investigation: UN, Amnesty, Human Rights Watch

            2008 Israel Op 'Cast Lead'  >> precisely timed to end before  #Obama inauguration .. so Obama didn't have to respond.

            no comment / let's forget about the past & look to the future is standard slogan for those engaged in serious crime

            Jan 8, 2009 >> UN Resolution passed (US abstaining) >> calling for immediate cease-fire with usual terms - NEVER OBSERVED

            > UN ceasefire Resolution of Jan 8, 2009 > broke down completely w. next episode of 'mowing the lawn' in Nov. 2012

            >Nov. 2012 'mow the lawn' [ie military offensive against Palestinians] >> get good sense what going on looking @ casualty figures: 79 killed / 78 of them Palestinians

            The above points were summarised weeks ago, and this is one of the things I didn't get around to finishing.  Hopefully it makes sense.
            I thought the Chomsky UN video was amazing.  It explains in simple terms what's really going on, which was a revelation to me, as I'm new to politics and as you don't get this sort of information from mainstream media.


             [Excuse any typos.  Another all-nighter, no sleep.  Getting to be a baaaaad habit.]

            August 13, 2014

            GAZA / PALESTINE - PROSTITUTION OF WESTERN PRESS FOR ISRAELI PROPAGANDA


            ‘Guardian’ runs anti-Hamas Wiesel ad but support for Israel still ebbs
            By JERRY LEWIS
            08/13/2014 05:45


            Ad saying “Jews rejected child sacrifice 3,500 years ago... now it’s Hamas’s turn” was penned by Elie Wiesel and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach.

            The traditionally anti-Israel Guardian newspaper angered many of its regular readers by publishing a full-page advertisement on Monday claiming that Hamas were child murderers.

            In agreeing to accept the advert, already published in several US newspapers including The New York Times, USA Today and The Wall Street Journal, a spokesman for the Guardian said that its decision followed a “full discussion” within the paper.

            It was made clear that acceptance of the text “does not equate to support or endorsement for the views expressed in that advertisement. The Guardian is fully committed to reporting from the Middle East and our coverage will continue to be independent and robust.”  [It's dissemination of propaganda for cash.  The Guardian, NYT, USA Today & The Wall Street Journal are disgraceful sell-outs that demonstrate the pointlessness of a money-driven press.]

            Last week the Times declined to accept the advert, despite being owned by Rupert Murdoch, who counts the Wall Street Journal in his portfolio. A spokesman explained that in reserving the right to reject advertisements, they felt that the opinions being expressed were “too strong” and would “cause concern” among readers.

            [...]

            Under a large photograph of a masked Hamas operative wielding a weapon, the advertisement urged British Prime Minister David Cameron and other world leaders to condemn Hamas’s use of children as human shields and demanded that Hamas must reject “child sacrifice.”

            Stop the War Coalition – an anti-war organization, who in conjunction with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign have organized mass protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza, took action against the advert before it even appeared. On their website they accused the authors of placing “a wildly inaccurate and inflammatory advert from the supporters of Israel branding Palestinians opposing Israel in Gaza as ‘child killers.’” To date the Guardian has received over 250 complaints while the Advertising Standards Authority said on Monday it had received seven complaints about the advert, understood to relate to issues of accuracy, harm and offence. The cost of a full page black and white advert is approximately £50,000. The paper recorded losses of around £30.6 million in 2013.


            [...]

            Boteach, in Sderot on a solidarity mission told the Post that the purpose of the advert was “to go on the offensive rather than the defensive.” The story was not Israel harming children – but of Hamas “serving up its children in the form of an ancient barbaric practice of child sacrifice to pursue its murderous goals.”

            He said he was shocked at the Times’ decision not to run the advert, despite his offer to modify the text.

            Asked why he subsequently chose the Guardian, Boteach said “I know the place, I lived there... and I greatly respect their promotion of freedom of the press and expression.”


            ...................................................................
             COMMENT


            Israel are the child killers who pulverised Gaza and its civilians.

            This is perverse beyond belief.


            August 09, 2014

            JIMMY CARTER: CALLS FOR RECOGNITION OF HAMAS



            Israel-Gaza crisis: Jimmy Carter calls for recognising 'terrorist group' Hamas as a legitimate 'political actor


            Wednesday 06 August 2014


            Jimmy Carter, the former president of the United States, has called on Western powers to recognise Hamas as a legitimate “political actor”.

            The 39th President said that the Palestinian group, which America defines as a terrorist organisation, cannot be "wished away" in an article he co-wrote with the former Irish president Mary Robinson for Foreign Policy magazine.

            There is no humane or legal justification for the way the Israeli Defence Forces are conducting this war,” Carter and Robinson wrote.

            "Hamas cannot be wished away, nor will it co-operate in its own demise," they continued.

            "Only by recognising its legitimacy as a political actor — one that represents a substantial portion of the Palestinian people — can the West begin to provide the right incentives for Hamas to lay down its weapons.”
            [...]

            http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/jimmy-carter-calls-for-recognising-terrorist-group-hamas-as-a-legitimate-political-actor-9651450.html



            Knew that he was supportive of Palestine but I had no idea he was also supportive of Hamas.
            Well, of recognising Hamas.

            That's mindblowing, considering his an American.


            August 08, 2014

            GAZA - Israel lobbying Germany for checkpoint guards - Germanys Christian Democrats want disarmement of Hamas


            German approval for Gaza mission

            Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has called on Germany to lead a control mission on the borders of the Gaza Strip. Politicians in Berlin say they can imagine giving their approval.

            Politicians from various parties can imagine Germany participating in a mission to control the Rafah checkpoint between the Gaza Strip and Egypt. "I personally believe that it's our duty, and that we must not turn a blind eye to what's going on," said Reinhold Robbe, the chairman of the German-Israeli community and a former parliamentary commissioner for the armed forces. "Germany has a special responsibility because of its history."  [What?  Is this exploiting a German guilt trip? Or am I missing the point?  And what's wrong with the US?  Why don't *they* stand guard?]

            Lieberman wants German leadership

            European border guards have controlled the Rafah checkpoint before. The first European Union Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Rafah went from 2005 to 2007, after Israel ended its occupation of the Gaza Strip. But the European Union ended the mission after Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections in 2006 and took control of Gaza in 2007. Over the past few days, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his counterparts in France and the United Kingdom have hinted at the possibility of taking up control of the crossing once again.

            Israel's foreign minister Lieberman sees Germany as 'Europe's leading political nation'
            [Flattery will get you anywhere.]

            The idea was welcomed by Israeli Foreign Minister Lieberman in an interview with the German mass-circulation broadsheet Bild: The EU should "send inspectors that control trade between Gaza and its neighbors," he told the newspaper, adding that because of its "role as a politically leading nation in Europe" Germany ought to "assume responsibility as the leader of such a mission." Fresh escalation would have to be prevented by all means, Lieberman added. The question was "how to make sure that Hamas doesn't collect its terrorist strengths again and smuggle new weapons into the country."

            In an article to be published Friday in Bild, Steimeier said that he could see Germany having a role in Gaza following Israel's monthlong war there.

            "Together with our European partners, we are ready to make a contribution, for example with an EU monitoring mission of the border crossing," Steinmeier told Bild. "We are holding intensive talks with all sides to work out what would be necessary for this," he added.  [Partners?  Where have I heard that before?  Oh, yes, the US is big on 'partnerships'.]

            ...

            Will all sides agree?

            It remains unclear what Hamas thinks of the idea and whether Egypt would even agree to open the checkpoint. Leaders in Cairo have taken a tough stance on Islamists within Egypt, and they want to see Hamas isolated internationally.

            "The condition for Germany to take part is that all sides agree," said Niels Annen, the spokesman on foreign policy affairs for the Social Democrats (SPD).

            The news agency Reuters quoted deputy SPD group chairman Rolf Mützenich as saying that a relatively safe environment would have to be guaranteed and that that was not the case at the moment.

            Robbe, the president of the German-Israeli community, favors a UN mandate for such a mission. It was important to have military protection, he said: "I'm not sure it would be enough to send customs officials supported by ordinary policemen," Robbe told German public radio Deutschlandfunk.

            Roderich Kiesewetter, a security expert for Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats, said that "having German soldiers on the ground is not an option because that would be unacceptable for Israel."

            Philipp Missfelder (CDU) wants Germany to help Israel disarm radical groups [Good luck.]

            The SPD's Annen said he still believes that opening the checkpoint under international control is the right way to go. "If you keep up the blockade, there will only be more tunnels in future," he warned.

            Members of the opposition Left party have already signaled their approval, even if the faction has traditionally been critical of German security forces' missions abroad. "If the EU can help, it should do so," Left foreign policy expert Stefan Liebich said. And he added that he would support Germany's doing its share of the work.

            Philipp Missfelder, of the CDU, suggested that Germany go a step further. "A control mission could help disarm radical groups in the Gaza Strip," he said.





            Why are these foreigners interested in getting involved in the internal affairs of Palestine - ie the Hamas disarmament factor?

            How long are foreigners expected to be checkpoint guards? 

            Why are the Palestinians even corralled off on a tiny slither of land?

            And good luck with the Christian Democrat plan on disarming Hamas.






            ISRAEL - Hamas Bashing - Propaganda or Israel defending real threat to the West?



            PM: We're Fighting for the West, Not Just for Us
            In interviews with international media Thursday, Prime Minister Netanyahu said Israel's fight against Hamas was not just for Israel.
            By Yaakov Levi
            First Publish: 8/8/2014, 12:55 AM


            In interviews with international media Thursday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu pressed Israel's case on defending citizens from Hamas' terror attacks. By fighting Hamas, the leading edge of Islamist terrorism, Israel is defending not only itself, but the entire Western world.

            Speaking to Fox News, Netanyahu said that the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) “is taking swaths of Iraq and Syria. It's now pushing into, right close to Lebanon and perhaps into Jordan. That's very, very dangerous and ISIS is basically a sister movement of al-Qaeda. You have Hezbollah, radical Shiites fighting radical Sunnis; you have Hamas; and you have in Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and in North Africa a plethora of Islamist terrorist groups.

            “They're all fighting among themselves, but they all agree that once they destroy, vanquish their Muslim moderates who are there who don't share their views and they behead them and do horrible things to them. And then they have to get to Israel, which is the Western country in the region…but we're the Small Satan. For all of them, you're the Great Satan. The radical Shiites are backed by Iran. The radical Sunnis have various backers and so on, and these people fight among themselves who'll be the king of the hill. But one thing they agree on, it's going to be an Islamist hill and it's going to be a world dominated by their unforgiving creed, their violent ideology which rejects modernity, rejects human rights, rejects, puts women as chattel, all minorities are subjugated or eliminated,” Netanyahu said.

            Speaking to German network ZDF, Netanyahu said “Hamas is part of a movement, an Islamist movement that wants to reconstruct an Islamic dominion without human rights, without plurality, women as chattel, no rights for minorities, for gays, you name it. They either don’t exist or they should be executed. This kind of unforgiving creed has anti-Semitism as part of its horrible doctrine. And that, when we see that spreading in parts of Europe, we‘re grateful when we see strong leaders like Angela Merkel, and some others in Europe, stand up forcefully against this anti-Semitism. I think that’s, we need support for Israel, but also the fight against anti-Semitism, and the liberal values that we all share. Support for the liberal values that we all share."


            http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/183838




            Don't suppose Hamas is going to give an interview to Fox News and German ZDF network, so we can hear their side of the story?

            Israel is NOT a European/Western country.  It might have European settlers of mixed and Semitic origin, but it is a Middle-Eastern country.

            I'm not religious and I don't understand how people can be religious or why they seek to impose their own take on religion on others, so I don't understand why the fundamentalists are so full on or what threat they allegedly pose to Europe.

            But I'm inclined to think it's some propaganda bogeyman, because it's unlikely that one group of Arabic people will ever dominate another group of Arabic people and it is more likley that there will *always* be a struggle between the various groups' beliefs and that there will never be a united Arab (or Islamic) world.

            If Israel were to disappear there'd be missiles to send from Turkey or wherever else, so I don't know what he's talking about. 

            The appeal to the fight against 'anti-Semitism' combined with the emphasis on 'shared liberal values' is a brilliant move by Netanyahu.

            Not too many in the West are likely to sympathise with picture of extremist, unforgiving head loppers coming their way -- soon.

            How real is that threat?  Who knows?  I've only just started watching politics.  On an emotional level, the spectre Netanyahu raises is very hard to shake off.  It's undeniably scary.



            ...........................................................................

            *** NOTE reference to 'entire world' in opener.

            Exaggerations like that are always a bit suss.






            August 07, 2014

            CARNAGE UNLEASHED ON PALESTINIANS DEPENDS ON WESTERN SUPPORT


            Gaza is a crime made in Washington as well as Jerusalem
            The carnage unleashed on the Palestinians is part of a decades-old routine that depends on western support


            Seumas Milne

            The Guardian, Thursday 7 August 2014

            ... while the overwhelming majority of Palestinian dead are civilians – 430 of them children – and 64 of the Israeli dead are soldiers, it is Hamas that is branded terrorist, rather than the Israeli armed forces armed with the most sophisticated targeting technology in the world.

            It’s only necessary to consider for a moment what the reaction would have been if the death toll had been the other way round to realise how loaded are the scales of western moral outrage and selective the appetite for action. And it’s only by ignoring the entire history of the conflict that it can be portrayed as the result of some wearisome ancient ethnic hatred.

            This week’s centenary of the outbreak of the first world war should help. David Cameron claims it was fought for freedom. In reality, it was a savage industrial slaughter perpetrated by a gang of imperial powers to carve up territories, markets and resources.

            Far from defending democracy or the rights of small nations, Britain and France ended the war divvying up the defeated German and Ottoman empires between them, from Iraq to Palestine. A century on, we’re still living with the consequences.

            ... a British foreign secretary had signed the Balfour declaration, which on behalf of one people promised to a second the land of a third. Palestine would be a “home for the Jewish people” provided that nothing would prejudice the rights of the “existing non-Jewish communities”, as the Palestinians were described.

            So began its full-scale colonisation by mainly European settlerssomething that could have happened only under colonial rule – which three decades later would lead to the establishment of Israel and the dispossession or expulsion of the majority of the Palestinian people.

            Four Arab-Israeli wars on, the 44% of Palestine allocated to the Palestinian majority under the 1947 UN partition plan had been entirely occupied by Israel – and the Palestinians were fighting a guerrilla war for self-determination and the refugees’ right of return.

            The other day I came across a copy of Newsweek magazine from March 1978, with a picture of an Israeli tank on the cover under the headline “Israel strikes back”. Then it was south Lebanon that Israel was punishing, not Gaza – and the “terrorists” of Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organisation, not Hamas, that its forces were targeting.

            Israel staged an even larger-scale invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and occupied the south for another 18 years. Since the Oslo agreement of the early 1990s failed to produce the Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza it was supposed to, Israel has colonised, bombed and reinvaded the Palestinian territories it illegally occupies (along with Syria and Lebanon) time and again: in 2002, 2006, 2008 and 2012.

            The justification is always the same: the security of the occupier must be upheld against the resistance of the occupied and blockaded population. And at every stage Israel has had the military, financial and diplomatic support of the west, the US above all.

            Despite the hand-wringing, that backing has been unwavering throughout the past month’s devastation of Gaza. Not only is Israel’s right of “self-defence” in a territory it illegally controls upheld, while the same right is denied to the Palestinians, but the US, whose military aid to Israel runs to $3bn a year, has been re-supplying it with weapons as its troops and aircraft pulverised and massacred their way through an impoverished territory from which its captive people are unable to escape.

            Europe is in the same game. Britain has licensed the sale of a startling £8bn worth of military or dual-use equipment since 2010, and £42m of direct arms sales – including parts for drones and tanks used in the destruction of Gaza.

            ...

            EXTRACTS ONLY - FULL @ SOURCE

            http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/06/gaza-crime-washington-jerusalem-carnage-western-support




            Wow, good article from The Guardian.

            Well worth a read.

            Also gratified that the imperialist aims of WWI participants was mentioned.

            Nothing has changed since WWI.  

            US and its allies are bound to go to war for territories, market and resources -- just watch Ukraine.

            August 06, 2014

            US - JEN PSAKI - GAZA - US JUSTIFIES ISRAEL KILLING OF PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS


            NEW YORK POST ARTICLE



            Egging Hamas on


            By Post Editorial Board

            August 5, 2014

            Note to John Kerry: If America is serious about protecting innocent Palestinians, get your State Department to stop encouraging Hamas to use them as human shields.

            This was the inadvertent effect of spokeswoman Jan Psaki’s remarks Sunday.

            ...




            COMMENT

            So what happened to the Israeli 'Iron Dome' ... is it on the blink?

            Psaki is just providing the Israelis with the same 'excuse' for kill Palestinian civilians.

            Don't know that I'd take anything Jen Psaki's got to say about Hamas as gospel.

            ......................................................................................
            Here's Jen Psaki briefing the press on behalf of the US State Department -- but the brief is full of holes and based on 'evidence' that does not stand up to examination of the FACTS:



            YouTube

            Psaki: “Masters of saying one thing & doing another.” 28 July 2014 (Ukraine)



            Published on 28 Jul 2014
            Jen Psaki, State Department Spokesperson.
            U.S. Department of State - Daily Briefing: July.28.2014
            ... 28 July - The US government has been desperate to produce information to back up its claims, but it would not release important information in such an unprofessional way if it was true, the head of the Institute for Political Economy Paul Craig Roberts told RT.
            On July 27 the US State Department released satellite images via email “proving” that Russia was firing rockets at Ukrainian troops across the border. The images were posted on Twitter by the US ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt. The four-page document, titled 'Evidence of Russian Shelling into Ukraine,' contains four satellite images, all dating between July 21 and July 25/26. The slides were prepared by the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and have a short description.
            Read more: http://rt.com/op-edge/176072-us-image...

            Source - ARKANAR (YouTube) - here.

            ......................................................................................

            RT NEWS ARTICLE

            ‘Wrong time, altered images’: Moscow slams Kiev’s MH17 satellite data


            Published time: August 01, 2014 10:27
            Edited time: August 03, 2014 16:11 
            Satellite images Kiev published as ‘proof’ it didn’t deploy anti-aircraft batteries around the MH17 crash site carry altered time-stamps and are from days after the MH17 tragedy, the Russian Defense Ministry has revealed.
            The images, which Kiev claims were taken by its satellites at the same time as those taken by Russian satellites, are neither Ukrainian nor authentic, according to Moscow's statement.
            The Defense Ministry said the images were apparently made by an American KeyHole reconnaissance satellite, because the two Ukrainian satellites currently in orbit, Sich-1 and Sich-2, were not positioned over the part of Ukraine’s Donetsk Region shown in the pictures.
            Moscow claims weather and lighting conditions in the images were not possible at the dates and times Ukraine claims they were made, the Russian ministry said.
            At least one of the images published by Ukraine shows signs of being altered by an image editor, the statement added. 

            ...
            FULL @ SOURCE
            SOURCE - RT NEWS - HERE.

             RT NEWS VIDEO


            SOURCE - RT NEWS - HERE.


            Kiev's (SBU secret services) evidence does not hold up to examination of FACTS

            So it's fake.  LOL

            I'm inclined to believe everything coming out of the US is FAKE.


             ......................................................................................

            SBU - The Security Service of Ukraine (Sluzhba Bezpeky Ukrayiny), or SBU, is Ukraine's special purpose law enforcement agency and main government security agency in a sphere of counter-intelligence activity and combating terrorism. [wikipedia]

            Sounds like the Ukraine SBU should be renamed 'The Propaganda Ministry'.


            August 02, 2014

            IRON DOME - $255 MIL US FUNDING TO ISRAEL - DEMOCRATS & REPUBLICANS STAND WITH ISRAEL



            'Iron Dome' - is designed to destroy incoming rockets and artillery shells.

            Components are:

            • tracking radar
            • management and weapon control system
            • missile firing unit

            'Iron Dome' - can determine expected landing whereabouts of projectiles and intercepts those that pose threats.

            ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .......
            US Senate just approved emergency 'Iron Dome' funding of $225 million to Israel
            ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .......

            During my travels, I stumbled on this article:


            http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2014/08/01/senate-passes-225-million-to-fund-israels-iron-dome/


            Local leaders attend national Jewish unity event in support of Israel

            Posted: Friday, August 1, 2014 10:45 am

            By David Baugher, Special to the Jewish Light

            As combat continues in Gaza and diplomatic efforts run around the clock to end the fighting, five St. Louisans were among hundreds in Washington D.C. who were able to hear from leadership in both parties about America’s relationship with Israel.

            ...

            The gathering, which took place at the National Press Club under the auspices of the Jewish Federations of North America and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, included representatives from Jewish agencies in 50 communities. ...

            While there, the visitors heard Monday from top-ranking congressional leaders including Republican House Speaker John Boehner and Democratic Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer. National Security Advisor Susan Rice also spoke as did Israel’s ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer.

            The trip comes as the military conflict in Gaza, which began earlier this month, is intensifying. The U.S. has generally backed the Jewish State’s efforts against Hamas but has also been trying to negotiate a ceasefire. Israeli media has crackled of late with reports of deep dissatisfaction toward American Secretary of State John Kerry whose recent outline for a truce was seen by some as not addressing Israeli security concerns. The ongoing negative commentary drew an uncharacteristically icy rebuke Monday from a State Department spokeswoman who said the criticism was “not the way partners and allies treat each other.”

            ...

            “Both of them said that what you hear in the press is not true,” Markus said. “Kerry has been making an extraordinary effort and reports have been misleading. The reality is that Kerry’s work on behalf of the U.S. has been very helpful every step of the way for Israel.”

            ...

            Susan Rice said again and again that we have always been a partner with Israel,” she said. “We stand with Israel during times of war and during times of peace. We understand what’s at risk here.”

            Rice also talked of Iron Dome, the Israeli defense system which has seen success in warding off rocket attacks from Gaza and Rep. Eliot Engel of New York told the group he would push for greater American aid to expand the system.

            Engel said he was introducing a bill in the House tonight to support the Iron Dome and provide more funding for Israel,” she said.

            ...

            “It was Republicans and Democrats. They said that we may disagree on a lot of things but what Congress and this administration stands together on is Israel,” she said. “There was just no doubt that the relationship was strong and enduring.”

            ...

            Croughan said other topics of conversation included the need to destroy Hamas’ tunnel system, the demilitarization of Hamas in Gaza and the disturbing rise of anti-Semitic sentiment in Europe in the wake of the conflict.

            ....

            Extracts only ... full @ source:
             -------------------------------------------
            COMMENT

            I think the cards might be stacked against the Palestinians.