Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Took forever to edit this. Think I'm off my face tired. I've had a horror of a time trying to find the exact Hillary Clinton 'obliterate Iran' video that I saw the other day. Think this is it. Found myself doubling up and taking forever to edit the confusing layout. Think I'd better get some sleep soon.
The Red Ice Creations audio (above) very good. Did not finish listening to all of it. Will go back when I'm not so tired.
Julian Assange Is Still a Creep
The WikiLeaks founder could score an invite to CPAC next year. By Rich Lowry
September 08, 2016
If Julian Assange plays this right, he just might score an invitation to CPAC next year.
The notorious WikiLeaks founder would have to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference remotely because he is still holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, avoiding a rape investigation in Sweden and fearing extradition to the United States for his malicious exposure of state secrets. But, surely, the details could be worked out.
Assange is now treated as a respectable figure by some elements of the right because he despises Hillary Clinton and promises to torpedo her campaign with new email exposures. Never mind that he has done everything within his power to damage the interests of the United States, in league with his quasi-ally, Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Rarely has “strange new respect" been stranger.
It’s like conservatives embracing Kim Philby, the infamousBritish double agent who defected to the Soviet Union in the 1960s, if he promised to produce damaging information about LBJ before the 1964 election. Or welcoming Philip Agee, the anti-CIA activist from the 1970s who was allied with Russian and Cuban intelligence, if he demonstrated enough hostility to Jimmy Carter.
The enemy of my enemy (or more properly, my domestic political opponent) can still be a reprehensible creep, and that’s what Assange is.
But Sean Hannity of Fox News has a newfound soft spot for the accused rapist and scourge of America. A couple of years ago, Hannity tore into the Obama administration for not doing more to capture the WikiLeaks founder, and sympathized with the contention that Assange was the equivalent of a terrorist. Now, the host says he was “conflicted” about Assange back then, and he had qualms about his work only because “I believe in privacy.”
This makes it sound as though WikiLeaks published a Hulk Hogan sex tape. Instead, Assange dumped, among other things, what the Defense Department called “the largest leak of classified documents in its history.” Hannity was outraged a few years ago that the leaks potentially endangered U.S. allies in Afghanistan — the Taliban vowed to track down named U.S. informants — but now hails Assange for exposing “how corrupt, dishonest and phony our government is.”
Assange puts his agenda in more starkly anti-American terms. He has a poisonous, Chomskyite view of the United States as a dastardly “empire,” bending the world to its will and persecuting brave dissidents like none other than Julian Assange.
When he started out, Assange was committed to exposing the world’s genuinely pernicious states. He said he was going to criticize “highly oppressive regimes in China, Russia and Central Eurasia” and warned a newspaper in Moscow of the damaging information he had acquired about Russia. [comment: look up the list of coups, invasions, proxy wars, propping up brutal dictatorships, and wars waged by ruling capitalists of America, under the American flag, since WWII. Compare what criminal capitalists appropriate of American taxpayer money, to spend on capitalist war machinery, to world military spending: it dwarfs what is spent by all other nations on the planet. ]
Assange is no longer in that line of work. He has fallen into the arms of Putin as he pursues his vendetta against the United States and its former secretary of state, whom, it so happens, Putin will never forgive for criticizing Russia’s 2011 parliamentary elections. [comment: That 'into the arms of Putin' imagery is disturbingly homoerotic. Looks like Putin's topping. LOL ... 50 Shades of Putin vendetta? Rich Lowry's certainly inventive. ]
The not especially telegenic WikiLeaks founder somehow briefly landed an RT show, and it was his idea for National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to seek refuge in Russia. The New York Times recently documented how Assange’s leaks tend to track with Russian interests. [comment: the same capitalist controlled New York Times with a history of CIA (capitalist agent) collaboration. ]
The avowed champion of transparency and free speech told the Times he doesn’t go out of his way to criticize a Russian government that kills journalists because to do so is “boring.” [comment: US agents of Capitalism most likely KILLED AMERICAN JOURNALIST MICHAEL HASTINGS, while they CURRENTLY IMPRISON AMERICAN JOURNALIST, TARGET OF FBI POLITICAL POLICE, BARRETT BROWN. ]
Interfering in a U.S. election is apparently much more interesting. U.S. officials believe that Russia was behind the hack of the Democratic National Committee that WikiLeaks used to such effect around the time of the Democratic convention. The promised additional WikiLeaks exposures may well be the handiwork of the Russians, as well.[comment: that is called journalism, propaganda spinner. If capitalist controlled media was actually capable of doing the job of real journalism, this is what corporate media would be doing. But it's not up for the job precisely because it is media in capitalist hands. Instead, capitalist-controlled media is nothing but a propaganda organ of capitalists and their agents (the politicians they control). This hit piece is a perfect example of the games they play in the unrelenting capitalist effort to control and shape public opinion. ]
It is Hillary’s own fault that she is vulnerable to the likes of Assange. Her secrecy, corrupt practices and dishonesty make her an ideal target. Yet there is a world of difference between Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch who has done so much through litigation in the U.S. courts to expose Clinton, and Assange, a certified America-hater whose work is likely enabled by Russian intelligence. [comment: WTF? Assange is an Australian, and an international journalist, democratising information and publishing whistleblower submissions of government and corporate wrongdoings. In which case, why would Assange — a non-American journalist and publisher of whistlebower submissions abroad — engage in extraneous litigation in American courts? Trump was right: this guy really is dumb. Certifiedjournalism-hater capitalist-owned propagandist. ]
There was a time when everyone could see the distinction, but that was before 2016, a year of strange, not to say loathsome, bedfellows. [comment: it's high time ordinary Americans notice the distinction between propaganda and journalism ... as well as the distinction between corrupt, capitalist-controlled politicians and their organisations, and honest representation. ]
Assange, Australian journalist target of corrupt US-Anglo Capitalist Empire political persecutioncontinues to do what Assange and WikiLeaks actually do: publishing of information of public interest that was submitted to WikiLeaks.
The stunning corruption and wrongdoing of the Democrats DNC organisation has been exposed ... and the editor of National Review proffers what is styled as his 'opinion', published in Politico (for which he has previously written his brand of American media shite), but this capitalist-owned media offering in the guise of Lowry's 'opinion' is nothing more than a capitalist-sponsored propaganda hit piece and manipulation intended to con the ordinary American, so as to shape public opinion in favour of the aims of capitalist and their agent, unindicted criminal Hillary Clinton. LOL
CERTIFIED JOURNALISM-HATER CONSPIRACY THEORIST
LOWRY SOUNDS LIKE A WOMAN SCORNED:
'notorious', 'holed up', 'avoiding a rape investigation', 'malicious', 'despises', 'torpedo her campaign', 'damage interests', 'quasi-ally' of Putin, 'enemy', 'reprehensible creep', 'accused rapist', 'scourge of America', 'capture', 'equivalent of a terrorist', 'dumped', 'potentially endangered', 'his agenda', 'poisonous', 'fallen into the arms of Putin', 'vendetta', 'interfering', 'handiwork', 'certified American-hater', and 'enabled'.
Capitalist sponsored editor, Rich Lowry, then attempts to discredit independent journalist, Assange, by painting laughable (and potentially homoerotic associations) of Assange having "fallen into the arms of Putin" (50 Shades of Putin ... LOL), among other things. Including misrepresenting the screening of 10-part Assange series of interviews on Russian TV, in a slimy, sneaking propagandist way that implies, without stating, there is supposedly a Russian 'connection'. But Russia's RT broadcasting of Western programs is not out of the ordinary, just as it is not out of the ordinary for Western media to screen foreign TV shows. I cannot recall where I read this, but I believe that this was an independent production and that broadcast rights were purchased by Russian TV, in the same way that TV stations in the US or in the UK etc, purchase rights to screen foreign programs. Furthermore, Assange's program is not the only Western program screened in such a manner by the Russians.
Lowry then crafts the cleverly conveyed, further fanciful depiction of Russian 'connection' (misleading the uninformed reader by (a) omission of relevant facts and (b) thus by failure to place information into context), as he moves onto discussing what is, in fact, the passport revocation and intentional stranding of American Snowden in Russia by the US capitalist agent 'government':
Snowden:
"The Obama administration has now adopted the strategy of using citizenship as a weapon. Although I am convicted of nothing, it has unilaterally revoked my passport, leaving me a stateless person. Without any judicial order, the administration now seeks to stop me from exercising a basic right. A right that belongs to everybody. The right to seek asylum." [arstechnica]
The various trivial facts listed by Lowry (in the paragraph beginning with the reference to Russia's RT TV program) in his Politico propaganda hit piece disguised as 'opinion', may assume an unwarranted significant to a casual reader that is unaware of the additional facts that Lowry has conveniently chosen to omit (in terms of the purchase of TV broadcasting rights by Russia and in terms of the cancelled Snowden passport and hence stranding in Russia), as he stacked his irrelevant snippets of what is otherwise factual, trivial, isolated information, as if these snippets of nowhere trivia were of significance. Lowry then refers to an article published in The New York Times capitalist propaganda organ (with a history of being CIA friendly) and mouthpiece for government (as agent of capitalists) propaganda sources, and therefore itself engaged churning out propaganda material in the guise of 'news', as distraction from real issues (blame and vilify targeted publisher Assange, blame and vilify targeted official 'enemy' Putin/Russia etc) - ie, distracting from real issues concerning political corruption (in this instance), demonstrating for us ordinary people how capitalist-sponsored media and intelligentsia mouthpieces and how the capitalist owned & controlled media act as voices and accomplices of capitalist agent government(s) that they publicly protect and otherwise serve as they disseminate propaganda & vilify official 'enemy' targets of capitalist forces, acting hand in glove to produce propaganda to manipulate public opinion, as desired.
The 'Capitalist Forces' (government as agent of capitalists, capitalist owned & controlled media and capitalist sponsored/owed intelligentsia) have the advantage, because on casual inspection their propaganda is assumed, by the unsuspecting, to be reasonable and accurate reporting of all relevant information pertinent to the message conveyed by same. But that is not necessarily the case and is probably seldom the case. The other advantage the Capitalist Forces have is that people simply do not have the time or inclination to comb over every detail in every item of propaganda that is delivered in the guise of 'news' and 'information'.
It would appear Rich Lowry has fallen into the ruling American capitalist elite's collective assh*le, judging by his ludicrous assault on a brave Aussie journalist doing the job of proper journalism (and not writing capitalist elite serving propaganda and vilification hits, like Lowry):
"reprehensible creep", "not especially telegenic WikiLeaks founder", and "scourge of America".
We now know who the reprehensible creep is: it's Lowry. And Lowry's not exactly an attractive specimen. LOL
Lowry's ridiculous #EverythingButKitchenSink smear and #BlamePutin hit piece has exposed Lowry as completely devoted to pulling the wool over the eyes of the American public. FFS, the propaganda piece is even disguised as 'opinion'.
Another futile attempt to distract from the vile stench of corrupt capitalist-controlled American politics, that may have worked back in the day when the public had no alternative to the garbage written by those that are employed to represent interests opposed to interests of ordinary Americans.
The #BlamePutin tactic Lowry and other capitalist scribes have adopted, stinks of the Clinton camp's deflection strategy. Hillary Clinton and her supporters have gone from the tactic of #BlameRightWingConspiracy (which would have been Whitewater, I believe), to #BlameDysfunctionalUpbringing (Monica Lewinsky) to #BlamePutin (and probably more aside from this)
Who will Hillary Clinton (and her teams of clever advisers) blame when she falls spectacularly on her face, if the American public is fooled into voting her in as President ... or will it be a case of 'What difference does it make?' for Wall Street's Darling, Hillary Clinton?
We're all aware of the filthy corruption, the monstrous lies, the farce of capitalist-sponsoredfaux 'democracy' in capitalist-controlled America that is exploited by the ruling capitalist elite, to the detriment of ordinary Americans, while the ruling capitalists continue to destroy an ongoing series of nations abroad since WWII on the American national tax-slave tab, under cover of the flag of the very people whose interests the capitalists subvert, and a people who are left to pay (for generations to come) the billions in costs of conducting ruling capitalist elite enriching wars. Yet the propaganda and capitalist drive to control and shape public opinion never lets up.
Check out this cucked conspiracy theorist's propaganda in relation to the Palestine issue:
What does this guy do, spend all his days dreaming persuasive propaganda pieces for the gullible?
All things considered, it's frightening that the public relies on individuals such as Rich Lowry for their news.
I would say that a good rule of thumb may be to assume that whatever the message that is conveyed by capitalist-controlled media (the propaganda organ of both capitalists and of government(s) as agent of capitalists) is propaganda (and largely lies) crafted from clever omissions, irrelevant details, and on the basis of false and illegitimate presumptions, and even outright lies etc (like Iraq's 'weapons of mass destruction').
The propaganda that is churned out in Western media is really shocking and sickening once it is spotted for what it is, when you consider what is at stake is not trivial: the public is effectively denied informed consent; targets of capitalists are vilified so that their persecution by capitalists and their agents is made easier to commit; countries are lined up for war or other assault by governments representing aggressive capitalism; and our societies are weakened and destroyed by these same Capitalist Forces that churn out propaganda, because these same forces are also agents of public indoctrination.
What course of action should the US media take when a batch of leaked emails reveal dirty dealings inside of the Democratic National Committee in a pivotal election year? Blame the Russians, of course.
Alleging that Russia is to blame for attempting to “sow public distrust in the upcoming presidential election” is not only a delightful piece of nonsense; it is subterfuge on a grand scale.
[...]
... claims that the Russians are attempting to hijack the 2016 presidential elections is a scurrilous attempt to conceal the really salacious aspects of the DNC email bombshell, which The Washington Post article barely skims. It had nothing to do with Russia, of course, but rather with the explosive content of the leaked DNC correspondences, which revealed a concerted effort to sideline Democratic presidential contender Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton.
To describe the leaked DNC emails as “embarrassing” may just be the media understatement of the year. Clearly, the discerning reader will glean nothing from ‘reading between the lines’ of this article, but must fill in the glaring blanks for themselves. Not only does the Post article conspicuously avoid mentioning Sanders, it also fails to discuss the untimely death of Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was gunned down in Washington, D.C. on July 8, 2016.
[ ...]
But don’t give up hope on the System just yet. The United States has promised to launch a major investigation – not into the mysterious murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich - but rather into “Russia’s covert influence operations”. And who better for the job than - wait for it - James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, who told a 2013 Senate hearing the NSA never collected data on American citizens?
Documents leaked by Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the National Security Agency, later proved that the agency had been gathering and storing phone meta-data on American citizens for years.
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist based in Moscow, Russia. His articles have been featured in many publications, including Russia in Global Affairs, The Moscow Times, Lew Rockwell and Global Research. Bridge is the author of the book on corporate power, “Midnight in the American Empire”, which was released in 2013. email: robertvbridge@yahoo.com
UNITED NATIONS LEGAL PANEL RULING ASSANGE UNLAWFULLY DETAINED
Assange: the untold story of an epic struggle for justice LINK | here
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
