TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Media Suppression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media Suppression. Show all posts

January 19, 2016

Swedish Authorities & Media Suppress MOB RAPE Stockholm - Blame Putin & Suppress the Reporting Media

Article
SOURCE
English Translation



In Summary

Background:

Sweden police cover up mob sex attacks
committed by migrant men
at youth festival in Stockholm since 2014

Whistleblower approaches Dagens Nyheter newspaper

& discloses Sweden police cover-up.

Dagens Nyheter
(who, along with their other Swedish mainstream media colleagues, are coincidentally active press participants in smearing Australian journalist, Julian Assange, the victim of Sweden authorities 'rape' allegations & Sweden-UK-USA political persecution following revelation of US & Western government misconduct & war crimes)
Picture this:

Sweden a 'bastion' of 'feminism' with its very own shiny, new 'feminist foreign policy' that's proudly trotted out by Swedish politicians and press ...

The same Sweden that has ... permitted Swedish women to be raped, gang raped & violently beaten by immigrants for DECADES (and now, apparently, mob sex attacked / raped, as well)

... while suppressing disclosure, attention and discussion,  re these crimes & thus attention on & discussion of policies which have resulted in this orgy of sexual assault by foreigner,  that may well require review given that:  feminist fantasy Sweden does not fit UGLY REALITY Sweden.

Swedish politicians get away with this because their agenda is supported by the mainstream Swedish press, who keep obedient and quiet regarding the issues.

Dagens Nyheter
bastion of feminism that it is
proceeds to SUPPRESS the migrant mob rape
of Swedish women whistleblower disclosure story
re Swedish police suppression
of mob rape scenario since 2014
& does so for 6 months

Nyheter Idag
(as I understand)
subsequently reports on suppression of mob sex attacks by both:
1.  Sweden police.
2.  Dagens Nyheter newspaper.
Subsequently, 
in a debate on Norwegian TV

Martin Aagård
journalist
Aftonbladet


champions
PRESS SUPPRESSION LEGISLATION
in Sweden

that would effectively SILENCE Nyheter Idag
the very newspaper that disclosed:

1.  Sweden police suppression of mob rapes.
2.  Sweden press suppression of mob rapes.

Martin Aagård
Aftonbladet Journalist
considers publications such as Nyheter Idag
as a 'defeat' of what he refers to as the 'real' media


ie the corporate media that suppressed 
SWEDEN POLICE SUPPRESSION of mob rape information
 
It is reasonable to assume that
this is also the same Swedish media
that in all probability:
continues to suppresses other information

Martin Aagård
Aftonbladet Journalist


holds out that he does not make
this appeal on behalf of Aftonbladet
/ which he describes as 'Scandinavia's largest site'
Instead, clever boy Martin Aagård, is relying upon ETHICAL RULES and consideration.
Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor, having pissed myself laughing.  

The mainstream media guy wants to exploit 'ethics' to protect an unethical mainstream press, unethical law enforcement and unethical Swedish politician SUPPRESSION of information, news, facts, political suppression, sex assault / rapes suppression and so on.

Ethical rules?
Are we talking about the same press/media that is:

ON RECORD FOR HAVING SUPPRESSED NEWS OF SWEDEN POLICE SUPPRESSION OF MOB SEX ATTACKS BY IMMIGRANTS IN STOCKHOLM SINCE 2014?

SWEDEN WENT DOWN THE TUBES
COMMENCING 1960s

Apparently, way back in the bad old days in 1960s Sweden, the press was FREE (or freer?) -- and it was ruthless

So the Swedish press was reined in via a 'press ethics system' and threat of regulatory consequences (I think)

HOWEVER
the newspaper targeted, Nyheter Idag, began publishing in 2014 and has voluntarily joined such Swedish 'press ethics system' press group in 2014.
Nyheter Idag newspaper
which disclosed Sweden police & press SUPPRESSION
has abided by press ethics rules in its reporting of DN's censorship
NONETHELESS
Martin Aagård,
Aftonbladet journalist,
proposes legislative action against
news sites such as Nyheter Idag.

THE DUCKS ARE PECKING

Meanwhile, in Sweden:

SEVERAL SWEDISH NEWSPAPERS
are nastily pecking at Nyheter Idag

for 'breaking rank' by PUBLISHING NEWS ... and the TRUTH

Nyheter Idag is getting ATTACKED as:
  • working for Sweden Democrats (anti-immigration party)
  • working for Russian state interests (blame Putin)
Martin Aagård
Aftonbladet Journalist
claimed that Nyheter Idag is owned &
run by Sweden Democrats (anti-immigration party)


DESPITE THE FACT that the Nyheter Idag site
is owned by a member of the PIRATE PARTY 
(liberties focus:   to protect civil & digital liberties)
SOURCE

English Translation




After the DN-revelation: Now flagging Aftonbladet Aagård for legislation against Nyheter Idag

Published:  18-01-1916  19:27

STOCKHOLM After Nyheter Idag revealed how the newspaper Dagens Nyheter deliberately chose not to report on sexövergreppen [comment:  'sex assaults'] in the Kungsträdgården [Royal Garden] last year, the criticism of Nyheter Idag has been great. Now flagging Aftonbladet journalist Martin Aagård that it may come legislation to stop Nyheter Idag.

The news that the newspaper Dagens Nyheter deliberately chose not to tell us about the great amount of sexual assault that hit the young girls in the
Kungsträdgården [Royal Garden] last year has hit like a bomb.  EDIT trans:  After [whistleblower] unveiling [to the newspaper paper] Dagens Nyheter (DN), instead of choosing to publish a major article [disclosing the mob sexual assaults covered up by Sweden police], DN chose to suppress news that police mörkat [had concealed] events.


[Edit:  NYHETER IDAG - Doing Its Job Informing the Public - Subsquently ATTACKED by Stalinist Swedish Press Publication Peers ]


Several newspapers in Sweden published articles with allegations that Nyheter Idag [EDIT: newspaper that broke the mob sex assaults cover-up by Swedish authorities story] is working on assignments for the Sweden Democrats. It has also published other claims, such as Nyheter Idag in fact working on behalf of the Russian state interests.

But despite the accusations, the Norwegian trade magazine journalist confirmed the story
Nyheter Idag revealed that DN darkened [EDIT censored/suppressed mob sex assaults] sexövergreppen. In a debate between the Norwegian writer Elin Ørjasæter and Aftonbladet journalist Martin Aagård came the matter was discussed in the Norwegian television channel TV2.

"A defeat for us in the real media"

In the live debate, Aagård claimed that
Nyheter Idag is owned and run by the party Sweden Democrats, despite the fact that the site is clear that the site at all times owned by a member of the Pirate Party. Furthermore Aagård very critical of media  Nyheter Idag scrutinized.

- It is a defeat for us in the real media if people turn away from us. It is not an Aftonbladet problem, we are still Scandinavia's largest site, if I get the opportunity to brag a little here. But you can, of course, attract readers in every way, there are other sites that post images of rape victims, who outsource everything, everything. Who do not have any ethical rules, explained Aagård in the box.

Furthermore, Aagård
[saw] fit to draw a parallel with what it previously looked like in Sweden when the media perceived as ruthless. One consequence of this was to become the press ethics system where all printed newspapers are automatically members and which Internet sites can voluntarily join.

Nyheter Idag is a site voluntarily been connected to the particular press ethics system since 2014.
- The press behaved similarly in Sweden in the 60s, it was very uninhibited. When threatened it with legislation, it would be stopped by regulators and then introduced to a pressure ethical system, then we got the current rules.
But despite, or perhaps because of, the Nyheter Idag followed regarding press ethics rules in their review of Dagens Nyheter flagged Martin Aagård to the legislature should take action against sites like the one you're reading now.
- I suspect that something similar will happen with these sites and Nyheter Idag, as I said a political body and not a journalistic, he declared before the debate in the Norwegian TV2 was over.

English Translation


Norwegian Trade Journal

Norwegian trade magazine journalist examines the Dagens Nyheter blackout

14-01-2016 17:18
OSLO Norwegian Journalists newspaper journalist has a probing article noted Dagens Nyheter's cover-up of sex crimes in Kungsträdgården in Stockholm during the festival "We are Sthlm". Swedish Journalists' counterpart has instead taken the DN of the defense and would not comment on the Norwegian article. 
- Unfortunately I do not have time to talk to you, says the magazine's editor in chief Helena Giertta to Nyheter Idag.
[ CONTINUED AT SOURCE .. ]
https://archive.is/E2I2D#selection-2203.0-2230.0


---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT
This is a demonstration of EXACTLY how information, news, public debate, and political activity, discussion of REALITY etc, as well as dissent, is being suppressed and otherwise hijacked in Sweden.
Norwegian trade article sounds interesting.  No time to look now.  Must do dishes and shower.  lol


January 14, 2016

Sweden - Mayhem, Rape & Cover-Up Capital of the World

SWEDEN
Mayhem, Rape & Cover-Up
Capital of the World




Cover Up by Swedish Authorities
Asylum Seeker Rape of 3 Year Old
Sweden - Tingsryd, Kronoberg County

The government cover-up in Sweden is disgusting, particularly when the Swedish Immigration Agency is:
headed by, Anders Danielsson,
the former head of Sapo (Swedish security police).

People need to know what they're being exposed to by their governments.
LINK | here


TRANSCRIPT
'The Rape of Sweden' - Swedish Migration Agency (Migrationsverket)
Cover-up & Media Suppression
SWEDISH MIGRATION AGENCY

LINK | here


More on Sweden Migration Board (SAPO) guy:
Anders Danielsson is a lawyer and was Director General of the Security Police (SAPO), from June 2007 to April 2012, when he became director of the then Swedish Migration Board.
LINK | here


Twitter on Anders Danielsson
Swedish Migration Agency
LINK | here


Sweden: 
Rape & Inaction Capital of the World
 ... & AFP French Government Propaganda
LINK | here


Aquittal
Sweden: Älvsjö
Gang Rape - 3 Accused Somalians & other
Prosecutor Does Not Share View on 'Ambiguities'
LINK | here



Swedes Butchered in Ikea
by African 'Asylum seekers'
&
Down Syndrome Victim
Raped in Cafe by 20-Year-Old,
Assault-Convicted, African 
Denied Asylum
Sweden, Skellefteå, Västerbotten County

LINK | here



Also worth considering:

Sweden - Armed Gang Violence Escalates
5 Times Greater In Major Cities Sweden
LINK | here




---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------



Various that caught my eye.





January 12, 2016

Sweden Conceals Mass Rapes - Illegally Releases Assange Info to Media







  


SWEDEN
Authorities
& Press

CONCEALED
MASS RAPES
Sweden Authorities
Illegally Released
Assange Info to Media


[CLICK image for clarity / enlargement]
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.


POLITICAL
PERSECUTION

POLITICAL
PERSECUTION
LINK | SOURCE

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool

for FULL ENLARGEMENT
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.


POLITICAL
PERSECUTION

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

POLITICAL
PERSECUTION


NOTE:  same journalist & Swedish daily newspaper associated with the Sweden press cover-up of MASS SEXUAL ASSAULT / RAPE of SWEDISH young women & girls, a vocal and persistent critic of ASSANGE, WikiLeaks publisher-journalist, DETAINED OVER 5 YEARS, NO CHARGE), as American State Department & law enforcement TARGET NO. 1 -- despite damning evidence against Sweden's extradition-seeking allegations.

POLITICAL
PERSECUTION



Meanwhile, Sweden's REFUSAL to interview ASSANGE (detained Britain over 5 years, NO CHARGE), in line with British Crown Prosecution Service strategic advice NOT to INTERVIEW ASSANGE in UK, and therefore to DENY ASSANGE opportunity to DEFEND & to DEFEND against EXTRADITION to Sweden, SPEAKS VOLUMES re:
CONFIRMED
US Grand Jury
Sealed Indictment
(confirmed Jan. 2011 - LINK | HERE)
that would undoubtedly see US seek to assert political influence (and exert considerable political pressure, if need be) to have ASSANGE extradited to USA on capital (potentially death penalty) American-devised attempt to redefine journalism 'charges' for 'espionage'  ...

POLITICAL
PERSECUTION
POLITICAL
PERSECUTION

A S S A N G E
Hanne Kjöller
Swedish daily
 DAGENS NYHETER
Sweden Press
PERSECUTION & SMEAR
By same
Cover-Up Press

RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE
Select:  'Open Link in New TAB'
Use Magnifier tool
for FULL ENLARGEMENT
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------




SUPPORT
Australian
Journalist
JULIAN ASSANGE






December 02, 2015

WikiLeaks - The New York Times - US Government Mediated News & Other 'Free Press' Shockers

Media
Selling Unicorns❄
Corporate-Serving Media
In Service of Aggressive Neoliberal Foreign Policy
|  Manufacturing Consent
Bias.  Compliance.  Censorship.
Disinformation.  Distraction.  Diversion. 
Suppression.  Smear.


censorship & disinformation
is denial of informed consent


Dishonourable Mentions

The New York Times

The New Yorker
The Washington Post

LINK to other Media Bad Boys | here



WikiLeaks
The New York Times

more

WikiLeaks
The New York Times 
US government mediates
its WikiLeaks redacted stories
freedom of information documents show
Source | WikiLeaks | here
USG FOI | Emails PDF |  here



other


The New York Times
published military “expert” C.J. Chivers report
purportedly based on rocket trajectories etc
& asserting gas shells could only have been fired by Syrian army positions
--> Ghouta attack
"became the pretext for a warmongering campaign by the White House and the US and European media"

--> Obama
"threatened immediate air strikes"
“Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire ... sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal."
*** "US military leadership also knew that White House claims that there could be no other source for the sarin gas than the Syrian army were false"
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html



American Media
Refusals to publish
Journalist Seymour Hersh

The New Yorker
The Washington Post
refused to publish
Seymour Hersh first report on Ghouta gas attack
US press largely silent re Hersh report
US press as at July 2014 "blacked out latest exposure"
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/07/syri-a07.html



The Washington Post
The New Yorker
Refused to Publish an Article on Obama Admin Syria Lies
Michael Krieger | Posted Monday Dec 9, 2013 at 11:00 am
https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/12/09/how-the-washington-post-and-the-new-yorker-refused-to-publish-article-on-obama-admin-syria-lies/

LINK to other Media Bad Boys | here

November 18, 2015

Video - Immgration - Sweden & Europe


EUROPE ABSORBING

CONSEQUENCES OF AMERICA'S WARS
AFGHANISTAN. IRAQ. LIBYA. SYRIA.
14 Years
Afghanistan War Alone

Swedish TV Report

Left Wing Violence

Pub May 2014
SOURCE


Soviet Sweden?

Model Nation

Sliding to Third World

 Pub Apr 2014
SOURCE




Help Sweden

Pub Jul 2012
SOURCE

Ode To A Dying People

"Falling down towards the abyss, the abyss
The reaper embraces me with his kiss
It makes me want to refuse to care, refuse to care
To watch this all unfold too much to bear"


Lyrics | Saga |  here

 



Lengthy - 2:47:01

Documentary

Immigration - Europe

Pub 25 Sep 2015

SOURCE




Somebody, wake the driver ...

Dispatch International

English

Swedish

October 05, 2015

Immigration - Europe: Media Suppression, Media Propaganda, Media Harassment, Media Blackout

Media
Selling Unicorns❄
Corporate-Serving Media
In Service of Aggressive Neoliberal Foreign Policy
|  Manufacturing Consent
Bias.  Compliance.  Censorship.
Disinformation.  Distraction.  Diversion. 
Suppression.  Smear.


censorship & disinformation
is denial of informed consent



Dishonourable Mentions


The Huffington Post
harassing ordinary Germans
opposed to foreign invasion by immigration
& Islamisation of Germany
/ suppression freedom of speech & expression of political dissent
/ by abuse of media position
Link  |  here



ZDF
Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen
taxpayer funded German broadcaster
caught covering up rapes by migrants
so as not to 'legitimise' critics of mass immigration 
Link |  here (as above)


Nordic Media Cover-ups
Article #2 (in series of articles examined)
Disastrous Consequences of Immigration & Rapes Suppressed
"Swedish newspapers such as Aftonbladet systematically conceal the ethnic identity of the perpetrators in cases involving immigrants, though, and only show photos featuring white criminals."
Link  |  here


Bloomberg View
Economist

for promoting the destruction of Europe
& painting political dissenter group Pegida
as a 'noxious' and 'xenophobic'
/ as if Germany & the nations of Europe ought to embrace
alien invasion by immigration
& resulting ethnic, cultural and national self-destruction
as an obligatory 'moral' duty
/ Whose interests do you think Bloomberg & Economist serve?
Link  |  here


Media Blackout
PEGIDA Dresden, Saxony, Germany
28.09.2015
Over 20,000 protest
against Islamisation of West (Video)
Link  |  here


Sweden
Tino Sanandaji Interview
Swedish political elite & MEDIA SUPPRESSION
re negative facts of immigration
/ speech oppression
Link  |  here





October 04, 2015

Germany: Totalitarian State & Totalitarian Press

Article
SOURCE
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=63c_1443826634#comment_page=2





The Huffington Post
Germany

Abusing Media Position & Harassing Ordinary Germans who exercise freedom of speech


ENGLISH TRANSLATION
Link | here



17 Dec 2014

Anti-Islamist Riots in Germany: Hooligans Against Salafists



23 Aug 2015

Anti-refugee protest turns violent in Heidanau, Germany




3 Oct 2015

Riots in a refugee camp in Kassel / Germany


Published on 3 Oct 2015
The European Migrant Crisis: Riots in a refugee camp in Kassel / Germany (State of Hesse)


26 Sep 2015

Immigrants already causing trouble in German




MEDIA COVER UP - ZDF

23 Sep 2015

German Media Caught Covering Up Rapes By Migrants



23 Sep 2015
"Paul Watson and guest, Alex Benesch, reveal why Germany cannot handle the number of refugees they are taking in and how the local media is covering up reports of rapes at the hands of Muslims."


InfoWars Video:  Transript
Alex Benesch talks complete sh*t,

discrediting this video
Link  |  here






September 22, 2015

'NYT Erases CIA’s Efforts to Overthrow Syria’s Government' (Adam Johnson)

Article
SOURCE

http://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/


Down the Memory Hole: NYT Erases CIA’s Efforts to Overthrow Syria’s Government 
By Adam Johnson
20 September 2015

The New York Times depicts a sad Obama to accompany its story claiming that he trained Syrian rebels against his better judgment. (photo: Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)

FAIR has noted before how America’s well-documented clandestine activities in Syria have been routinely ignored when the corporate media discuss the Obama administration’s “hands-off” approach to the four-and-a-half-year-long conflict.  This past week, two pieces—one in the New York Times detailing the “finger pointing” over Obama’s “failed” Syria policy, and a Voxexplainer” of the Syrian civil war—did one better: They didn’t just omit the fact that the CIA has been arming, training and funding rebels since 2012, they heavily implied they had never done so.

First, let’s establish what we do know. Based on multiple reports over the past three-and-a-half years, we know that the Central Intelligence Agency set up a secret program of arming, funding and training anti-Assad forces. This has been reported by major outlets, including the New York Times, The Guardian, Der Spiegel and, most recently, the Washington Post, which—partly thanks to the Snowden revelations—detailed a program that trained approximately 10,000 rebel fighters at a cost of $1 billion a year, or roughly 1/15th of the CIA’s official annual budget.

In addition to the CIA’s efforts, there is a much more scrutinized and far more publicized program by the Department of Defense to train “moderate rebels,” of which only a few dozen actually saw battle. The Pentagon program, which began earlier this year and is charged with fighting ISIS (rather than Syrian government forces), is separate from the covert CIA operation. It has, by all accounts, been an abysmal failure.

One thing the DoD’s rebel training program hasn’t been a failure at, however, is helping credulous reporters rewrite history by treating the Pentagon program as the only US effort to train Syrian rebels–now or in the past. As the US’s strategy in Syria is publicly debated, the CIA’s years-long program has vanished from many popular accounts, giving the average reader the impression the US has sat idly by while foreign actors, Iranian and Russian, have interfered in the internal matters of Syria. While the White House, Congress and the Pentagon can’t legally acknowledge the CIA training program, because it’s still technically classified, there’s little reason why our media need to entertain a similar charade.

Let’s start with Peter Baker’s New York Times piece from September 17 and some of its improbable claims:

    Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers, After a Syria Solution Fails

    By any measure, President Obama’s effort to train a Syrian opposition army to fight the Islamic State on the ground has been an abysmal failure. The military acknowledged this week that just four or five American-trained fighters are actually fighting.

Notice the sleight-of-hand. There may only be “four or five American-trained fighters…fighting” expressly against ISIS, but there is no doubt thousands more American-trained fighters are fighting in Syria. The DoD’s statement is manifestly false, but because the New York Times is simply quoting “the military”which, again, cannot not legally acknowledge the CIA programit is left entirely unchallenged. This is the worst type of “officials say” journalism. The premise, while ostensibly critical of US foreign policy, is actually helping advance its larger goal of rewriting US involvement in the Syrian civil war. A four-year-long deliberate strategy of backing anti-Assad forces–which has helped fuel the bloody civil war and paved the way for the rise of ISIS–is reduced to a cheesy “bumbling bureaucrat” narrative.

Baker went on:

    But the White House says it is not to blame. The finger, it says, should be pointed not at Mr. Obama but at those who pressed him to attempt training Syrian rebels in the first place — a group that, in addition to congressional Republicans, happened to include former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    At briefings this week after the disclosure of the paltry results, Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, repeatedly noted that Mr. Obama always had been a skeptic of training Syrian rebels. The military was correct in concluding that “this was a more difficult endeavor than we assumed and that we need to make some changes to that program,” Mr. Earnest said. “But I think it’s also time for our critics to ‘fess up in this regard as well. They were wrong.”

    In effect, Mr. Obama is arguing that he reluctantly went along with those who said it was the way to combat the Islamic State, but that he never wanted to do it and has now has been vindicated in his original judgment. The I-told-you-so argument, of course, assumes that the idea of training rebels itself was flawed and not that it was started too late and executed ineffectively, as critics maintain.

The sleight-of-hand continues: The article presents the training of rebels as a “way to combat the Islamic State,” but repeatedly speaks in general of training Syrian rebels as something “Obama always had been a skeptic of”–which flies in the face of the fact that he did so, to the tune of $1 billion a year over four years, with 10,000 rebels trained.

But the piece goes on to make clear that when it’s talking about “training Syrian rebels,” it’s referring not only to the anti-ISIS program but to efforts to overthrow Syria’s government as well:

    The idea of bolstering Syrian rebels was debated from the early days of the civil war, which started in 2011. Mrs. Clinton, along with David H. Petraeus, then the CIA director, and Leon E. Panetta, then the Defense secretary, supported arming opposition forces, but the president worried about deep entanglement in someone else’s war after the bloody experience in Iraq.

    In 2014, however, after the Islamic State had swept through parts of Syria and Iraq, Mr. Obama reversed course and initiated a $500 million program to train and arm rebels who had been vetted and were told to fight the Islamic State, not Mr. Assad’s government.

This is outright false. These two paragraphs, while cleverly parsed, give the reader the impression Obama parted with the CIA and Mrs. Clinton on arming opposition forces, only to “reverse course” in 2014. But the president never “reversed course,” because he did exactly what the Panetta, Petraeus and Clinton urged him to do: He armed the opposition. Once again, the Pentagon’s Keystone Kop plan is being passed off by journalists who who should know better as the beginning and end of American involvement in the Syrian rebellion. Nowhere in this report is the CIA’s plan mentioned at all.

The whitewashing would get even worse:

    Some Syrian rebels who asked for American arms in 2011 and 2012 eventually gave up and allied themselves with more radical groups, analysts said, leaving fewer fighters who were friendly to the United States.

But the US did get arms to Syrian rebels in 2012. In fact, Baker’s own publication reported this fact in 2012 (6/21/12):

    CIA Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition

Indeed, according to a rather detailed New York Times infographic from 2013 (3/23/13), shipments began, at the latest, in January 2012:

An Arms Pipeline to the Syrian Rebels: New York Times [graphic]

Note that this map accompanied an article headlined “Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid From CIA.”

The CIA’s program, when discussing a fraught foreign policy issue like Syria, is simply thrown down the memory hole. How can the public have an honest conversation about what the US should or shouldn’t do in Syria next when the most respected newspaper in the US can’t honestly acknowledge what we have done thus far?

Vox depicts Free Syrian Army fighters–without acknowledging that the CIA helped to arm the rebels. (photo: STR/AFP/Getty Images)

The New York Times wouldn’t be alone. Comcast-funded Vox would also ignore the CIA rebel training program in its almost 4,000-word overview of the Syrian civil war. Again, the Pentagon’s program would be the sole focus in regards to funding rebels, along with reports of Gulf states doing so as well. But the CIA funding, training and arming thousands of rebels since at least 2012? Nowhere to be found. Not mentioned or alluded to once.

Reuters and the Washington Post’s reports on the US’s Syrian strategy revamp, while they didn’t fudge history as bad as the Times and Vox, also ignored any attempts by the CIA to back Syrian opposition rebels. This crucial piece of history is routinely omitted from mainstream public discourse.

As the military build-up and posturing in Syria between Russia and the United States escalates, policy makers and influencers on this side of the Atlantic are urgently trying to portray the West’s involvement in Syria as either nonexistent or marked by good-faith incompetence. By whitewashing the West’s clandestine involvement in Syria, the media not only portrays Russia as the sole contributor to hostilities, it absolves Europe and the United States of their own guilt in helping create a refugee crisis and fuel a civil war that has devastated so many for so long.

Adam Johnson is an associate editor at AlterNet and writes frequently for FAIR.org.

http://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/





Assange
Transnational Security Elite,
Carving Up the World Using Your Tax Money

London 
OCT8 Antiwar Mass Assembly (2011)
Link  |  here





---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

COMMENT


Another good article.

It's like watching a train wreck about to happen, in a nightmare where you're screaming but you can't be heard.