The Crow
In East Asian Mythology
*something is either wrong with the online dictionary, or there's two ways to spell 'occultist'. I'm going with 'occultist'. COMMENT I wanted to know where the Japanese were re the crow (re my recent video editing fun). |
TOKYO MASTER BANNER
MINISTRY OF TOKYO
|
Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts
June 27, 2016
The Crow in East Asian Mythology
June 25, 2016
Planet Tokyo - Asahi Breweries
|
December 14, 2015
GIF - Hiroshima & Nagasaki & WWII Propaganda
Labels:
Adolf Hitler,
Atomic Bomb,
Franklin D. Roosevelt,
GERMANY,
Harry S. Truman,
Hiroshima,
Japan,
Nagasaki,
Propaganda1,
Quebec Agreement,
Third Reich,
Video,
Winston churchill,
WWII
August 04, 2015
Machiavellian USA Spying on Japan - Consistent With US Bid for Total Control on Economic & World Stage
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-08/02/c_134472389.htm Commentary: U.S. spying on Japan proves it has never treated allies as equals
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-08/02/c_134472389.htm Realpolitik = "politics or diplomacy based primarily on power and on practical and material factors and considerations, rather than explicit ideological notions or moral or ethical premises." "Realpolitik is sometimes used pejoratively to imply politics that are coercive, amoral, or Machiavellian." [wikipedia] COMMENT I love articles from alternate sources. |
July 24, 2015
Japan Hyping China Threat
SOURCE http://www.ecns.cn/2015/07-23/174137.shtml Chinese ambassdor to Japan warns against hyping China threat 2015-07-23 08:50 Global Times Editor: Li Yan
Ambassador Cheng urges Japan to face history with right perspective
The Chinese ambassador to Japan on Wednesday warned against Japan's attempt to hype up "China threat" while adjusting its security policy to a path away from its post-War pacifism.
In an exclusive interview with the Global Times on Wednesday, Cheng Yonghua, Chinese ambassador to Japan, said China is alarmed by Japan's recent move to portray China as a "security threat" in its latest defense white paper while mustering support for a defense bill that seeks to expand Japan's military role overseas. "We resolutely oppose the Japanese government using China as an excuse for pushing its security policy. It is dangerous [for the Japanese government] to make up and exaggerate 'China threat,' as it would lead to escalation and confrontation, in particular because China and Japan are neighbors," Cheng told the Global Times.
In the defense white paper released Tuesday, Japan's defense ministry said China has continued "attempts to alter the status quo by coercive measures" in the South China Sea.
Cheng, however, pointed out that China has historically held sovereignty over the South China Sea.
"We have to look back into history, as China since the Han and Tang dynasties become the first to discover, name and manage the islands and reefs," Cheng noted, "During World War II, Japan occupied the islands of Nansha and Xisha. But after the war, the Potsdam Declaration stipulated that these islands be returned to China."
The neighboring countries in the region never declared sovereignty over these islands until the end of 1960s, Cheng said.
Having worked in the Chinese Embassy in Japan for over 20 years, Cheng has observed a promising development in Sino-Japanese relations, from the four-point principled agreement reached between Japan and China in November 2014, to the increasing economic exchanges between the two countries.
But he pointed out that the historical problems have for long cast shadow on the Sino-Japanese relations. This year, which marks the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII, offers Japan an opportunity to, based upon the reflection of the past, turn a new page in history and move forward.
As the world commemorates the 70th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascism War this year, and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe prepares to make a statement in August, Cheng urged the Japanese leader to face the history with a correct point of view. "Without a right view of history, the future path will be dangerous," said the ambassador. "Japan must demonstrate sincerity of a perpetrator to the victims, and guarantee through action that history won't repeat itself," he said.
With a series of events planned in the country in September to mark the end of the war, China has invited the leaders of all the relevant countries to those events. Whether or not Abe will attend the events in Beijing has not been decided, according to the ambassador.
SOURCE http://www.ecns.cn/2015/07-23/174137.shtml --------------------- COMMENT
Why isn't anyone concerned about the Japanese breaking the pacifist position?
Is Japan proposing to attack China along with USA and its allies after provoking some kind of confrontation over the South China Sea dispute?
--------------------- LOOK-UPS Potsdam DeclarationTerms of Surrender of Japanese, WWII conflict - here.Japan didn't immediately act on surrender, so USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. |
September 03, 2014
Japan $35 Billion Investment into India - joint Indo-Japanese military industrial complex.
|
This struck me as rather big news.
Note also, the US has been hanging around India and India recently visited US.
So the US probably want a piece of the action.
Also, the US big ally in the Asia region is Japan ... so I wonder if there's any quiet investment by US???
August 08, 2014
US - SHALE GAS - JAPANESE and CHINESE MARKETS
Why Japan Will Drive Global LNG Growth There is little reason to expect Japan’s reactors will offset its voracious new appetite for LNG. |
That's just the Japanese / Chinese market.
* China will be largely natural gas reliant (Russian deal) ... but some diversity expected.
* Japan is a big market ... but they *could* revert to nuclear, so market not assured?
Don't forget Europe needs energy, too. Hello Europe.
July 30, 2014
USA - War or Bluff?
Former Kremlin advisor gives Russia's view of the crisis in Ukraine Chris Uhlmann reported this story on Tuesday, April 15, 2014 07:19:43 |
G7Canada The European Union is also represented within the G7. The G7 are the seven wealthiest major developed nations by national net wealth, representing more than 63% of the net global wealth ... (2013). |
Although this dates back to April 2014, it's useful to bear in mind the economics mentioned.
How's the remark about US need for a 'big war'?
Some blog I was on said it was a toss between Japan, China or Russia.
Not sure why Japan was mentioned, as it's got very close ties to the US (as I understand).
I'm guessing Russia is 'it', although the US looks to be a 'challenger' in the Pacific region, given it's reportedly planning on focusing it's aircraft carrier naval fleet (I think it was) in the region over the next decade.
So what's going to happen? Is the US going to go to war? Will it be with Russia or with China?
Most likely Russia, I reckon. China's where US probably produces their cheap goods, so they're probably not bent on disrupting that.
Russia is singled out for constant Ma-look-what-he-did! (but got no proof) accusations, vilification as an 'aggressor', singled out for sanctions, singled out for a press smear, singled out for 'shunning' and so on -- so it's 'henpecked' by the US-NATO mob as well as the EU arm of this 'thing' that seems to call the shots on a collective, bullying basis.
It's like a form of international 'mobbing' behaviour, that's usually confined to toxic organisations and workplaces.
So is this all bluff or is Russia 'it'?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)