Twitter & Facebook Capitalist Oligarchy Stasi

ministry of tokyo CENSORSHIP RESIST THE THOUGHT POLICE ABANDON FACEBOOK ABANDON TWITTER Twitter & Facebook Capitalist Oligarchy Stasi Twitter Capitalist Oligarchy Stasi are conducting a mass purge of non-PC / non culturally Marxist — and alt-right — accounts of real public opinions, attitudes, perceptions, political expression etc., to create an artificial perception of public opinion on what is supposed to be a 'social media' platform, but is in reality nothing but an extension of the lying capitalist-controlled mainstream media and its capitalist-sponsored media and intelligentsia soapbox shills and capitalist-sponsored 'progressive' Soros activist-bots. Facebook is likewise spinning crap about 'false' news stories and censoring the public on their probable CIA-Mossad spy site, while subjecting to the long-suffering public to piles and piles of nothing but ideological lies, propaganda and indoctrination, showcased on their sh*tty 'social media' surveillance and censorship, distortion-spinning, unreality-making, and public opinion manipulating, platform of more of the same capitalist-controlled, in league with capitalist agent government, shite. FOX NEWS reports that actor James Woods has left Twitter: “Since @Twitter is now in the #censorship business, I will no longer use its service for my constitutional right to free speech. #GoodbyeAll” he tweeted Friday. Not providing a link because FOX NEWS is a disgraceful propaganda churner that cannot even report on this basic freedom of speech issue, without making it clear that FOX news is incapable of even conveying the most basic information WITHOUT BIAS and without capitalist oligarchy spin. F*ck you, FOX NEWS.  F*ck you and your lying inverted commas crap, and your insertion of irrelevant detail smokescreen and promotion of what is clearly smokescreen crap.   FOX NEWS is doing its best capitalist oligarchy attempt to create the impression that 'hate speech' is ideologically and otherwise (a) legitimate per se  (b) relevant to what is, in fact, a post-Trump election POLITICAL PURGE AND STASI CENSORSHIP of THE LYING, CAPITALIST-OWNED PROPAGANDA & FALSEHOODS, PUBLIC PERCEPTION & OPINION MANIPULATING PLATFORM, TWITTER. F*ck you, again, FOX NEWS. AND ... f*ck you Twitter & Facebook.

Germany Rises: Traitor Rat Minister Heiko Maas Chased Off - May Day

Heiko Maas What a c*cksucker Thank you, Germany! ------/\/\/ Maas Muss Gehen! Germany Rises: Traitor Rat Minister Heiko Maas Chased Off - May Day Facebook ist schuld Facebook is to blame source | rechtsvorlinks LOL ... Angela Merkel swallowing American c*ck is very funny "Get out, Traitor!" German People Chase Off Traitor Rat Minister of Justice Heiko Maas to his Armoured Mercedes https://youtu.be/J9rvjdB-VRc ------/\/\/   Ist Maas der bessere Himmler? Is Maas the better Himmler? http://halbpfosten.blogspot.com/2016/02/maas-vs-himmler.html I burnt my caramel sauce looking at this ... LOL http://www.thedailysheeple.com/germans-shout-down-and-chase-pro-migrant-minister_052016 “Leftist Rat”-Germans Shout Down and Chase Pro-Migrant Politician May 2, 2016 | Joshua Krause | The Daily Sheeple | 1,275 views Ever the elitist, Heiko Maas has consistently promoted the cause of migrants at the expense of native Germans over the years. To him, there is no such thing as a German. Everyone is a migrant, and their culture isn’t worth protecting after what Germany did in World War 2. He’s demanded that the German people change their lifestyles to accommodate the migrants, and he fully supports subsidizing the migrants with Germany’s hard earned tax dollars. On top of that, he has expanded censorship laws, and has demanded more jail time and fines for people who post “hate speech” online. To him, being opposed to a multicultural Germany is a thought crime that must be stamped out. Fortunately Heiko Maas received a populist reality check yesterday at the hands of an outraged crowd of working class citizens, during a May Day celebration speech. He was repeatedly called a “traitor” and a “leftist rat,” and was eventually chased off the stage. http://www.thedailysheeple.com/germans-shout-down-and-chase-pro-migrant-minister_052016 ------/\/\/

Zuckerberg Declares Ideological Rape War on the World

ZUCKERBERG DECLARES IDEOLOGICAL RAPE WAR ON THE WORLD #BoycottFacebook FACEBOOK IS NOT YOUR FRIEND http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/04/14/trump-campaign-responds-to-zuckerberg-swipe-by-telling-him-to-move-to-border/ Trump Campaign Responds to Zuckerberg Swipe by Telling Him to Move to Border by Ben Kew14 Apr 20160 Tension is mounting between the Donald Trump campaign and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg after the two billionaires took swipes at each other following Facebook’s F8 developer conference on Tuesday. “I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others,” Zuckerberg told an audience of 2,000 people at the conference in San Fransisco. “If the world starts to turn inwards, then our community will just have to work even harder to bring people together.” He later posted on Facebook that his latest speech was “personally important” to him and “different from any other speech I’ve given.” He also said that his message was not just for America, but to help connect people around the world. “It’s about having the courage to choose hope over fear,” he wrote. The Trump campaign was quick to respond. “I’ll take Mark Zuckerberg seriously when he gives up all of his private security — move out of his posh neighborhood and come live in a modest neighborhood near a border town,” Katrina Pierson, a spokeswoman for the Trump campaign, told CNBC. “Then I’m sure his attitude would change.” The exchange comes as Zuckerberg attempts to play a more hands-on role in global politics. His company, Facebook, has come under criticism for censoring “hate speech” in Germany in reference to the influx of over 1 million migrants into the country. He has also met with world leaders over the years including President Barack Obama, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, despite Facebook being banned in China. He has also spoken out on the issue of terrorism, recently saying that “love” will defeat the Islamic State. Trump, meanwhile, has a Facebook following of nearly 7 million people. Both the Trump campaign and Zuckerberg have confirmed they will not be commenting further on the matter. You can follow Ben Kew on Facebook, on Twitter at @ben_kew, or email him at ben@yiannopoulos.net http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/04/14/trump-campaign-responds-to-zuckerberg-swipe-by-telling-him-to-move-to-border/ ---------------------- ---------------------- COMMENTS from Breitbart readers (& other as indicated): Zucky Pearls of Wisdom LOVE WILL DEFEAT ISLAMIC STATE FREE HUGS FOR ISIS [CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE]   Zucky's ZERO moral authority & ... Palo Alto BUFFER ZUCKY SECURES *HIS* BORDERS CNS News ZUCKY'S HYPOCRISY ZUCKY'S WALLS & BORDERS    ZUCKY'S CORDON SANITAIRE NAIVE ZUCKY?  ZUCKY JOSEPH STALIN FACEBOOK Breitbart Breitbart news.com.au HNGN Breitbart  ZUCKY'S STALINIST CENSORSHIP  & GOVERNMENT COLLUSION TO SILENCE 'UNDESIRABLES'  IS ZUCKY U.S. GOVERNMENT PAWN?  WIRED   PC MAG FACEBOOK IS NOT YOUR FRIEND

Google Agrees To “Right To Be Forgotten” Censorship Plan

Article SOURCE http://searchengineland.com/google-to-censor-worldwide-sorta-243938 http://searchengineland.com/google-to-censor-worldwide-sorta-243938 Google Agrees To Complicated Worldwide “Right To Be Forgotten” Censorship Plan Google will ensure those within a country where a RTBF request was granted cannot find censored content, regardless of what Google edition they use. Danny Sullivan on March 4, 2016 at 2:35 pm Google has said it will begin next week to censor content worldwide that it removes under the European Union’s Right To Be Forgotten mandate. But “worldwide” censorship will only apply to those searching from a particular EU country where the request was originally made. How The Censorship Works Does that make your head hurt? This might help. Assume that someone in Germany files a Right To Be Forgotten request to have some listing removed for their name. If granted, the censorship will work like this for searches on that person’s name:     Listing censored for those in Germany, using ANY version of Google.     Listing censored for those in the EU, using a European version of Google.     Listing NOT censored for those outside Germany but within the EU, using non-European versions of Google.     Listing NOT censored for those outside the EU, using ANY version of Google. As you can see, it’s worldwide censorship for those within the country where the request was granted, in the sense that no matter what edition of Google they use, the removed listings will not show for the terms involved. For a deeper explanation of how all this works, including why listing even within the EU will continue to show for other types of searches, see my previous article: Google To Remove Right-To-Be-Forgotten Links Worldwide, For Searchers In European Countries. Outside the EU, none of the censorship will be in place — so it’s not worldwide when considered that way. This will also be the case for anyone within the EU who manages to disguise their location, such as someone using a VPN. Google Feared Worse The move is in response to EU concerns that Google’s previous censorship didn’t fully uphold the Right To Be Forgotten. If someone was within the EU, they could go to Google.com or another non-EU version of Google and still find material that Google was ordered to remove. This change closes that backdoor — which wasn’t likely used much anyway — on a country-by-country basis. It’s a much better outcome than if Google had been ordered to censor for all people worldwide, as that potentially would have caused it to censor globally for political reasons, such as with China. Of course, there’s one country that Google does continue to censor globally for: the United States, such as with copyright infringement removals. See our previous article for more about that: How The Myth Of Google Censorship Was Busted By The EU & Canada. Danny Sullivan is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan. http://searchengineland.com/google-to-censor-worldwide-sorta-243938 ---------------------- ---------------------- COMMENT The right to information trumps any 'right to be forgotten' nonsense, designed to cover up for crooks & crooked politicians in Europe -- and to keep prisoner of war Germans from seeing historical material or whatever it is they are blocking from examination, in the likes of POW Germany. Bypass Censorship Europeans on VPNs & Tor should be able to bypass this nonsense to see what their politicians are *hiding* ... depending on where the exit node is (but you just keep at it until you get the country you need ... lol). On consideration, I expect that the *majority* of Europeans online will not be accessing VPNs or Tor, so this leaves the PUBLIC of INDIVIDUAL EUROPEAN STATES vulnerable to CENSORSHIP & MANIPULATION:  ie POLITICAL SUPPRESSION by individual NATION STATES, as they see fit (ie.  in favour of measures furthering the US-NATO & EU policy that's devastating Europe). Reason: Withholding information amounts to DENIAL OF INFORMED CONSENT.

Google - YouTube - Filthy Censoring, Harassing Corporate American US State Dept. Embedded C*NTS

Google - YouTube  Filthy Censoring, Harassing Corporate American US State Dept. Embedded C*NTS From Russia With LOVE  xxx BLOCKED By C*cksuckers at YouTube from embedding videos on Blogger ---------------------- ---------------------- Code produced by 'Insert a Video' [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE] Shows Upload While Editing No Show on Publishing (Example - Post) COMMENT Western CENSORSHIP & harassment. Pack of filthy corporate American US State Department embedded c*nts.

CENSORSHIP - Hillary Clinton E-mails - Hiding Western Colonialism, War Crimes, Tech & Media Collaboration

CENSORSHIP Hillary Clinton E-mails Hiding Western Colonialism  War Crimes Tech & Media Collaboration CENSORED HILLARY CLINTON E-MAILS -------/\/\/ LIBYA UK & France Got Libyan Oil for Supporting Gaddafi Ousting Colonialism in Action France and Britain expect favourable contracts to French & British energy companies muscling in on Libyan oil industry. -------/\/\/ SYRIA Tech & Media Prostitutes  in Bed With  US Government Commission of War Crimes GOOGLE & Al-Jazeera Al Jazeera state-funded broadcaster owned by the Al Jazeera Media Network partly funded by the House of Thani ruling family of Qatar HELPED Destabilise Syria -------/\/\/ Planned in Advance since at least 2006 Overthrow of Syria's Bashar al-Assad means Israeli domination Sectarian war on fall of Assad BONUS for Israel & its allies -------/\/\/ Goolge & YouTube Google blocked Benghazi Video 2012 Facebook does not want you to know about the Hillary Clinton e-mails INSPECT: WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton E-MAILS FACEBOOK CENSORING WikiLeaks Hillary Clinton e-mail RELEASE -------/\/\/ American & Allied AGGRESSION! & American Social Media CENSORSHIP! source:  @INTHENOWRT _____________________________ WATCH VIDEO VIA @INTHENOWRT ---------------------- ----------------------

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch Admits Ordering FBI Go-See re Global Warming 'Deniers' Censorship

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch at Senate Judiciary Committee admitted she asked FBI to examine if federal govt should take legal action 'climate change deniers' RON PAUL INSTITUTE Loretta Lynch Wants to Censor Climate Skeptics By Ron Paul   |   Tuesday, 15 Mar 2016 03:47 PM During her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, Attorney General Loretta Lynch admitted that she asked the FBI to examine whether the federal government should take legal action against so-called climate change deniers. Lynch is not responding to any criminal acts committed by climate change skeptics. Instead, she is responding to requests from those frustrated that dissenters from the alleged climate change consensuses have successfully blocked attempts to create new government programs to fight climate change. These climate change censors claim that the argument over climate change is settled and the deniers' success in blocking congressional action is harming the public. Therefore, the government must disregard the First Amendment and silence anyone who dares question the reigning climate change dogma. This argument ignores the many reputable scientists who have questioned the magnitude, effects, and role of human action in causing climate change. If successful, the climate change censors could set a precedent that could silence numerous other views. For example, many people believe the argument over whether we should audit, and then end, the Federal Reserve is settled. Therefore, the deniers of Austrian economics are harming the public by making it more difficult for Congress to restore a free-market monetary policy. So why shouldn't the government silence Paul Krugman? The climate change censorship movement is part of a larger effort to silence political speech. Other recent examples include the IRS' harassment of tea party groups as well as that agency's (fortunately thwarted) attempt to impose new rules on advocacy organizations that would have limited their ability to criticize a politician's record in the months before an election. The IRS and many state legislators and officials are also trying to force public policy groups to hand over the names of their donors. This type of disclosure can make individuals fearful that, if they support a pro-liberty group, they will face retaliation from the government. Efforts to silence government critics may have increased in recent years; however, the sad fact is the U.S. government has a long and shameful history of censoring speech. It is not surprising that war and national security have served as convenient excuses to limit political speech. So-called liberal presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt both supported wartime crackdowns on free speech. Today, many neoconservatives are using the war on terror to justify crackdowns on free speech, increased surveillance of unpopular religious groups like Muslims, and increased government control of social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Some critics of U.S. foreign policy have even been forbidden to enter the country. Many opponents of government restrictions on the First Amendment and other rights of Muslims support government actions targeting so-called "right-wing extremists." These fair-weather civil liberties defenders are the mirror image of conservatives who support restricting the free speech rights of Muslims in the name of national security, yet claim to oppose authoritarian government. Defending speech we do not agree with is necessary to effectively protect the speech we support. A government that believes it can run our lives, run the economy, and run the world will inevitably come to believe it can, and should, have the power to silence its critics. Eliminating the welfare-warfare state is the key to protecting our free speech, and other liberties, from an authoritarian government. This article first appeared on the Ron Paul Institute website. Ron Paul is a physician, author, and former Republican congressman. Paul also is a two-time Republican presidential candidate, and the presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party in the 1988 U.S. presidential election. His latest book is “Swords into Plowshares." For more of Ron Paul's reports, Go Here Now. © 2016 by Ron Paul Institute http://www.newsmax.com/RonPaul/Loretta-Lynch-Climate-Global-Warming/2016/03/15/id/719204/ Freedom of speech restrictions an issue at universities March 7, 2016 EXTRACTS The 501(c)(3) is a section of the Internal Revenue Code that defines nonprofit institutions, including most public and private colleges and universities, as tax-exempt. Taxpayers essentially give financial benefits to schools based on the educational value they offer. “Institutions often cite their tax-exempt status to justify banning political activity by students on campus or forbidding them to use university resources, broadly defined, for political purposes,” Catherine Sevcenko, director of litigation for Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said. The IRS has concluded that the restriction on political activity does not apply to individual academic community members, Sevcenko said. Since FIRE’s founding in 1999, the organization has won 385 cases for students and faculty at 250 colleges and universities, advancing freedom of expression for over 3.5 million students. Private universities are not the only higher educational institutions that have attempted to impose limits on speech. Private universities have no legal requirements for freedoms, but public universities have a legal obligation to allow students to speak freely. That’s because the First Amendment refers only to government suppression of speech. The University of Oklahoma sent an email to its community during the 2008 election cycle stating that personal university email accounts “may not be used to endorse or oppose a candidate, including the forwarding of political humor/commentary.” OU President David Boren revoked the email after extensive criticism. ... [Princeton Open Campus Coalition] Zuckerman founded the coalition to maintain Princeton’s vibrant culture after Princeton students led by the Black Justice League occupied President Christopher Eisgruber’s office in November and issued demands, including creation of cultural spaces on campus and cultural training. ... EXTRACTS ONLY - FULL HERE http://flyernews.com/freedom-of-speech-restrictions-an-issue-at-universities/ ---------------------- ---------------------- COMMENT And why would the US tax office be policing the political freedom of expression?  That's an abuse of powers:  it's not their role to limit criticism of politicians pending election, so they're exceeding their function. It looks like they've since ruled that they cannot limit the expression of 'individuals' on campus, but I take it that means politically based groups on campus remain subject to on-campus censorship? If they have altered their position on political censorship on campus, look what it has taken:   385 winning legal cases.  That's enormous. Too bad if you cannot find legal backers to protect rights. Two hundred and fifty educational institutions tried to censor and deprive students of their rights.  That's also massive. The US Attorney General sending the FBI on a mission to find a pretext to censor global warming 'deniers' is scary.  What a totalitarian state.