Workings of US Government & FBI Propaganda Attack Against WikiLeaks Exposed

WikiLeaks via @WikiLeaks Workings of US Government & FBI Propaganda Attack Against WikiLeaks Exposed GLOMAR DISCLOSURE https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/09/11/leaked-wikileaks-investigation-file/ The Leaked WikiLeaks Investigation File By Michael Best September 11, 2016     Articles There are a few problems that we, collectively, haven’t addressed with last week’s Daily Dot article and with how we’re looking at it. Almost immediately, the article became incendiary and divisive between those who dismissed it as propaganda and those who embraced it until they were embracing conclusions not supported, or even made, by the article. With a title like WikiLeaks release excludes evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia it’s no surprise that many saw this as either a “hit piece” against the organization or a sign that WikiLeaks is actively collaborating with Russia. While the article itself might not have been a hit piece, it’s clearly the result of a carefully calculated attack on WikiLeaks. Aside from some contextual information, the article’s sole source is a 500 page document that was sealed by a federal court. These sealed court documents were accumulated as part of the government’s investigation into WikiLeaks and could only have been access by a small number of people, most of them government workers. According to the article, the records were “obtained by the Daily Dot through an anonymous source,” one that not even the authors appear to understand the motives of. Without being able to examine the documents to understand their context and look for signs of alterations, it’s impossible to fully confirm the information in the article. However, we are able to examine the context of the article itself. The article begins with a simple BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) stating that WikiLeaks hadn’t published an email linking Russian and Syrian finances. This is followed up by two sentences about the theory that the DNC documents being published by WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 were obtained by Russian hackers. While there is good reason to be concerned about this possibility, there is no evidence suggesting that WikiLeaks has actively or willfully collaborated with Russian intelligence. WikiLeaks’ stance has been clear throughout – while they don’t comment on sources, they also don’t turn them away. If American or Russian intelligence provided documents that WikiLeaks was able to authenticate, they would publish them. The truth is more important than the speaker, and the messenger is insignificant compared to the message. While the sealed documents apparently contained some interesting quotes that were included in the article, the only truly important thing in the documents is the insinuation that WikiLeaks withheld an email. This is a position that even the authors were clear they couldn’t take, as there are other explanations and there is nothing to contradict WikiLeaks’ statement that they published all of the Syrian emails they received in any sort of usable format. There is some evidence to corroborate this. There is at least one set of hacked Syrian emails that WikiLeaks didn’t publish, and comes from a period after the alleged email about Russian-Syrian finance. I reviewed this set and it doesn’t include the time period that the email in question is from. The limited date range for these emails don’t make it possible to authenticate or disprove the existence of the email cited by the Daily Dot. However, they are a very good indication that WikiLeaks didn’t receive all of the hacked emails. It’s quite possible that this is due to FBI involvement, as both the hacker providing the files and the individual receiving them were apparently operating as FBI informants at the time. (If the documents were leaked with malice towards WikiLeaks, it’s likely they were also meant to be a painful reminder of two individuals that had been turned and used against the organization.) The batch of Syria emails I have a copy of, and others, were likely either sent to different sources as bait or simply prevented from being properly received by WikiLeaks. To help us understand the full context of the documents, I encourage the Daily Dot to publish the documents received. While the initial decision “not to publish the documents concerning RevoluSec’s activities at this time out of concern the hackers may be identified, captured, and possibly harmed in their home countries, which include Yemen and Syria” is understandable, this doesn’t prevent the documents from being redacted and responsibly released. CONTINUES https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/09/11/leaked-wikileaks-investigation-file/ COMMENT That was interesting. LMAO ... my guts are always right.  Still good to see stuff confirmed, because it doesn't seem so looney-tunes when it is. I had no idea about this, but I guessed right. USG propaganda.  Infiltration.  Malicious release.  USG agents sponsored and controlled by capitalists, up to no good. How funny is this? Pants down agents of capitalist propaganda. I love this.  LOL AND there's more ... Whoever Guccifer 2.0 is, they've released some more DNC material, according to WikiLeaks. After all this messing with pictures and layout, I think I'm too brain-fried to check out the DNC leaks right now. DNC via @WikiLeaks DNC via @WikiLeaks LINK | TRANSMISSION LINK | ALTERNATIVES

DNC Leak Democratic Deflection MO: Blame Putin!

WikiLeaks US 'evidence' alleging Russia behind DNC email hack is NOWHERE RT NEWS EXTRACTS [ ... ] Assange added that any evidence Russia was involved is merely circumstantial and could have been planted deliberately by “someone who wanted to make it look like a Russian” was behind the hack. Previously Assange said that he believes the accusations from the Democrats are an attempt to deflect attention from the contents of the leaked documents. Some 20,000 DNC emails were made public by WikiLeaks on July 22, revealing a close working relationship between the party and some mainstream media figures, as well as collusion with the Hillary Clinton campaign to sideline Bernie Sanders, her challenger for the presidential nomination. The Kremlin has dismissed the charges that Russia was behind the DNC hack as “quite absurd,” with presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov pointing out what he called the “American style” of casting blame first, then investigating afterwards. CONTINUED https://www.rt.com/uk/354503-wikileaks-dnc-evidence-preview/

Observer: "Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy"

WIKILEAKS DNC LEAKS Observer http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/ Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy 20,000 freshly leaked emails reveal resentful disdain toward Sanders, as party favored Clinton long before any votes were cast By Michael Sainato • 07/22/16 2:00pm In July 25, the Democratic National Convention will begin in Philadelphia, Pa. To commemorate the event and its embrace of corrupt politician Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee, Wikileaks is releasing thousands of DNC/Clinton emails.     Are you ready for Hillary? We begin our series today with 20 thousand emails from the top of the DNC. #Hillary2016 pic.twitter.com/YZbGhjTy2h     — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 22, 2016 In its recent leak of 20,000 DNC emails from January 2015 to May 2016, DNC staff discuss how to deal with Bernie Sanders’ popularity as a challenge to Clinton’s candidacy. Instead of treating Sanders as a viable candidate for the Democratic ticket, the DNC worked against him and his campaign to ensure Clinton received the nomination. One email from DNC Deputy Communications Director Eric Walker to several DNC staffers cites two news articles showing Sanders leading in Rhode Island and the limited number of polling locations in the state: “If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually.” Instead of treating Sanders with impartiality, the DNC exhibits resentful disdain toward him and the thousands of disenfranchised voters he could have brought into the party. “Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess,” wrote DNC Deputy Communications Director Mark Paustenbach to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda, in response to backlash over DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz shutting off the Sanders campaign’s access to voter database files. Another chain reveals MSNBC’s Chuck Todd and DNC staff members discussing how to discredit MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski’s call for Wasserman Schultz to resign. Most of the emails released come from seven prominent DNC staff members: senior adviser Andrew Wright, national finance director Jordon Kaplan, finance chief of staff Scott Comer, Northern California finance director Robert Stowe, finance director of data and strategic initiatives Daniel Parrish, finance director Allen Zachary and Miranda. The release provides further evidence the DNC broke its own charter violations by favoring Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee, long before any votes were cast. Over the past several weeks, Guccifer 2.0 released several internal memos showing DNC staff strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee—as early as March 2015. In June 2016, Florida-based law firm, Beck & Lee, filed a class action lawsuit against Wasserman Schultz and the DNC based on the revelations from these leaked files. Other emails show DNC staff in damage control over allegations from the Sanders campaign, when a report—corroborated by a Politico—revealed the DNC’s joint fundraising committee with the Clinton campaign was laundering money to the Clinton campaign instead of fundraising for down-ticket Democrats. Regardless of the fundraising tactics, because both major campaigns didn’t agree to use the joint fundraising committee super-PAC with the DNC, the DNC should have recused itself from participating with just the Clinton campaign. The Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0 leaks are the perfect end to a Democratic primary that undermined democracy at every possible opportunity while maintaining plausible deniability. The party’s rules, including the use of super delegates—who disproportionately endorsed Clinton before the primaries began—are intended to provide the Democratic Party leverage over the election process. Throughout the primaries, decisions were made by DNC officials to help Clinton build and maintain a lead over Sanders. More votes were cast for Clinton, but they were cast at the behest of a Democratic Party that downplayed her shortfalls to the extent that Sanders not only had to run against Clinton but also against the entire Democratic Establishment. Heading into the Democratic National Convention, voters are beginning to understand that their voices are of little concern to the leadership. http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/ COMMENT This publication is published by Trump's son-in-law. Article's a bit of a catch up on the DNC leaks. There's been a fresh round of US Democratic Committee resignations since.

Hillary Clinton's Iraq: Destruction of Libya & Spread of ISIS

WITCH OF BENGHAZI WIKILEAKS DNC LEAKS @WikiLeaks @Source MADAM SECRETARY 'CAESAR' SHILLARY LIBYAN BAYONET SODOMY SHILLARY'S IRAQ LIBYA DESTRUCTION SPREAD OF ISIS HILLARY CLINTON THRILL KILLER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y&feature=youtu.be Muammar Gaddafi Zenga Zenga Song Noy Alooshe Remix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBY-0n4esNY source https://wikileaks.org/hillary-war/ A vote today for Hillary Clinton is a vote for endless, stupid war by Julian Assange Tue Feb 9 10:47:54 EST 2016 Hillary didn't just vote for Iraq. She made her own Iraq. Libya is Hillary's Iraq and if she becomes president she will make more. I have had years of experience in dealing with Hillary Clinton and have read thousands of her cables. Hillary lacks judgement and will push the United States into endless, stupid wars which spread terrorism. Her personality combined with her poor policy decisions have directly contributed to the rise of ISIS. Pentagon generals objected to destroying the Libyan state. They felt Hillary did not have a safe post-war plan. Hillary Clinton went over their heads. Libya has been destroyed. It became a haven for ISIS. The Libyan national armory was looted and hundreds of tons of weapons were transferred to jihadists in Syria. Hillary's war has increased terrorism, killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians and has set back women's rights in the Middle East by hundreds of years. Having learned nothing from the Libyan disaster Hillary then set about trying do the same in Syria. Hillary publicly took credit for the destruction of the Libyan state. On hearing that the country's president had been killed by her handiwork, she became wild-eyed and gloated "We came, we saw, he died!". In the momentary thrill of the kill, she had aped, of all people, Julius Ceaser. Hillary's problem is not just that she's war hawk. She's a war hawk with bad judgement who gets an unseemly emotional rush out of killing people. She shouldn't be let near a gun shop, let alone an army. And she certainly should not become president of the United States. source https://wikileaks.org/hillary-war/ WITCH OF WALL STREET @Source @source @source @source LOL ... I only just noticed Bill the pussy hound in the background COMMENT Just some of what I found entertaining, having my first coffee of the day    ;) UNDEMOCRATIC FREE POLITICAL PRISONER AUSTRALIAN JOURNALIST WHISTLEBLOWER PUBLISHER JULIAN ASSANGE justice4assange ... FREE PEPE   LINK | article In Brief Nafeez Ahmed July 29th, 2016 Paris strikes astonishing partnership with secret Isis sponsor tied to Hillary Clinton [EXCLUSIVE] French industrial giant Lafarge business dealings with ISIS reported   Lafarge: regular donor to the Clinton Foundation Lafarge listed as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for first quarter of 2016 Lafarge implicated in CIA-backed covert arms export to Sadam Hussien during Hillary Clinton time as director & legal service provider in early 1990s Le Monde revealed that Lafarge paid taxes to Isis middlemen & other armed groups in Syria to protect Lafarge cement business ops in Syria Zaman al-Wasl (Syrian opposition run news outlet) revealed: Lafarge regularly bought oil from ISIS (based on internal documents & emails of Lafarge) Zaman al-Wasl reported: Frederic Jolibois, CEO Lafarge Cement, Syria personally instructed Lafarge to make payments to ISIS Lafarge 2015 - merged with Swiss cement maker Holcim Documents indicate: Lafarge’s Paris HQ fully aware of business deal with ISIS Aleppo region ISIS finance chief endorsement giving free circulation of Lafarge goods Lafarge made business deal with jihadist terror group(s) to maximise profits in Syria ops Zaman al-Wasl repoeted: Lafarge regular fuel buyer from ISIS for own ops Lafarge supplied cement for ISIS to sell in Syria EXTRACT Lafarge is a major beneficiary of disaster capitalism in Iraq, dominating a market where Iraq’s infrastructure remains in dire need of hundreds of billions of dollars in investment. The company describes itself as “one of the largest non-oil investors in Iraq.” The firm is not just an economic juggernaut. Its murky history of intelligence ties, and significant political clout in France and the US – the countries leading the airstrikes against Isis in Syria – raise the question of whether Lafarge believes it can profit from terror without accountability. FULL ARTICLE (LINK AS ABOVE) FULL ARTICLE (LINK AS ABOVE) LOL ... looks like Assange has his own Pepe @pepe_source