OPPRESSION. In response to
Nederländares [ie Nederlander] migration resistance to
police now have established ten intelligence units that monitor what citizen writes on social media.
Monitoring is then followed up with
home visits to the immigration critics who deemed to have gone too far.
As previously reported, has experienced a number of Netherlands loud protests and riots against the planned asylum accommodation, which also resulted in a number of asylum places stopped. At the same time, is now reporting the Dutch daily NRC Trade sheet on how
Dutch police recently started cracking down on people who expressed themselves critical of immigration on social media, with several named examples.
Mark Jongeneel, 28 years old from the municipality of
Sliedrecht, got from his mother know that he tried by two policemen who just knocked on the door and who now was on his way to his place of work. When the police confronted him in the Office where he works as they should according to the Land have expressed something along the lines of:
—
You tweet a lot. We have
ordered to ask you to moderate your tone. Your tweets can be regarded as seditious.
What Mark had done was he on Twitter had written a couple of posts that included a new planned refugee accommodation in Sliedrecht. The tone of the posts should have been along the lines of:
Sliedrechts City Council will come up with a proposal to receive 250 refugees for the next two years. What a bad idea! Should we let this happen?!
In another case, so wrote the
43-year mechanic Johan van Kite from the town of
Kaatsheuvel,
outraged on Facebook if they advertised plans to place 1200 refugees at the resort:
Let these leaders risk going to hell, we're going to all of them.
Later that day, he was a
20-minute police visit, in which he describes how the
authoritarian police officials pointed out that he was instigating a demonstration, after which they
forced him to remove it, he wrote. Since then describes John the feeling that his
liberty has been limited, and that he now feels aware that
police read when he writes on Facebook.
What the newspaper NRC experiences from a police statement, the
Dutch police in this purpose set up ten pieces of intelligence units, with
Digital detectives that in real time monitoring what is written on Facebook and on Twitter where you are looking for posts as "gone too far" in his criticism of the detention centres. Police gets here its legal support in the ban against so-called hate crimes and sedition, but
according to police is the limit [ie definition arbitrary] for what is illegal diffuse and constantly open to new interpretations.
After that post that "gone too far" discovered helps the local police with home visits to those individuals identified by the Digital detectives. The police are the last few months have
struck against a large number of Dutch people in this way. At least
20 such home visits have taken place in Leeuwarden in October last year. The same thing occurred in Enschede. And
in Brabant Kaatsheuvel so have at least three persons received a visit from the police.
This makes
overall newspaper NRC to talk about a police state, but a police spokesman for the local police in Malden defending the newspaper its actions with that particular tolerate demonstrations, but they have to be tillståndsgivna, and that freedom of expression certainly exists, where threats to Land just been speaking of recommendations. Mark see it all as an
attempt to silence him, but attests to the newspaper NRC that he does not intend to let this keep him back.
Swedish
https://www.nordfront.se/polisen-i-nederlanderna-slar-till-mot-medborgare-som-uttryckt-sig-invandringskritiskt-pa-natet.smr
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 