Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
"that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and long range missiles, and its continuing non-compliance with Security Council Resolutions, pose a threat to international peace and security"
... ummmmm, only there wasn't any
AGREED that Britain:
"should use all means necessary to ensure the disarmament of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction"
BRITISH POLITICIANS VOTE THAT:
British forces to invade Iraq in an ILLEGAL WAR the 'case' for which was manufactured by the US-Anglo Capitalist Empire
When this was happening I wasn't paying attention.
I can vaguely remember 2003. Think I was really, really depressed back then, thinking how sh*t my life was. LOL.
It actually wasn't as crap as I thought it was. It just seemed that way. Wish I could go back in time. Time's going way too fast for me.
Anyway, I don't think I turned on the TV that year, so I missed out on the war news. Not that I would have cared back then. It was so remote it may as well have been war on Mars.
I'm probably a bit more aware these days, but I'm probably as self involved as ever.
I'm shocked looking at this list of British MPs who voted for invasion of Iraq.
Look at how much power very, very ordinary and fallible everyday local politicians are granted, simply by being elected into positions of power by the electorate.
And just think about the potential for abuse that power and the importance, in that case, of accountability and transparency in government ... which is where WikiLeaks comes in.
[CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE] HOW DARE YOU? HOW DARE YOU? HOW DARE YOU? RAISE THE SPECIAL ANTI-CRITICISM SHIELD
meanwhile CUCKED BRITISH LABOUR PARTY
"If you look around this room, how many African, Caribbean and Asian people are there? We really need to get our house in order ..."
comment
The latest drama involving Our Noisiest, Most Protected, Most Funded, and 'secretly' Nuclear Armed Ally, and its supporters:
"Jeremy Corbyn was engulfed in a fresh row over Israel when he appeared to compare the government of Binyamin Netanyahu to Islamic extremists at the launch of an independent review into antisemitism in the Labour party."
... ONLY HE DIDN'T and The Guardian published the following:
This story was amended on 30 June 2016 to correct the quotation in the second paragraph. An earlier version quoted Corbyn as saying ...
and paragraph 2 has been amended to read:
In prepared remarks, Corbyn said: “Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions of Israel or the Netanyahu government than our Muslim friends are for those of various self-styled Islamic states or organisations.”
Corbyn has no balls and his words mean nothing.
It's whitewash ... unless all his 'friends' are non-supporters of foreign states and organisations.
Those that support Israel and those that support Islamic organisations, are also responsible for supporting any unacceptable activity committed by those states and organisations, when that activity conforms to a clear pattern of behaviour.
The beleaguered, cowering, and craven Labour Party suspended Livingstone for mentioning historic fact:
"Corbyn and Shami Chakrabarti, the author of the report into antisemitism, declined to comment on remarks made by the former London mayor Ken Livingstone, who was suspended by the party after saying Adolf Hitler had supported Zionism. Livingstone was still under investigation, said Chakrabarti, so “it would be completely wrong to comment”."
and the standard pattern of histrionics, media smear, politician public grovelling display and politician/public figure 'amends' display ensued.
Ruth Smeeth, (culturally Jewish, former director of public affairs & campaigns at: Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre)British Labour politician and US Embassy collaborator, according to WikiLeaks Cables, is accused by a heckler of collaborating with the British press that's hounding the British Labour Party and, more particularly, its leader on the left, Jeremy Corbyn, who has EXPRESSED STRONG SUPPORT FOR the dispossessed, bombed, and 9-years-blockaded PALESTINIANS.
Smeeth's heckler was expelled from the Labour Party, while the witch-hunt of Jeremy Corbyn continues ...
PoliticsHome.com Ruth Smeeth heckler expelled from Labour party
Written by: Agnes Chambre
Posted On: 1st July 2016
The activist who accused a Jewish MPof “working hand in hand" with the Daily Telegraph at Labour’s anti-Semitism report launch has been expelled from the party.
Marc Wadsworth, who claims to be a member of the pro-Corbyn campaign group Momentum, accused Ruth Smeeth of conspiring in a "witch hunt" with the paper.
Ms Smeeth later called on Mr Corbyn to quit because he "stood by and did absolutely nothing" while the incident was taking place.
Jeremy Corbyn accused of anti-Semitism by Jewish Human Rights Watch
WATCH: Jeremy Corbyn chats happily to Ruth Smeeth heckler
Labour coup on hold as 'defiant' Jeremy Corbyn refuses to quit
Labour MP says party is not a 'safe place for British Jews' under Jeremy Corbyn [comment: lol ... they're just using the 'anti-Semitism' card to get rid of a left that will challenge Israel's abuse of Palestinians. ]
Mr Wadsworth today expressed regret for any offence caused to Ms Smeeth and revealed to LBC radio that he had been expelled from the party due to “media reports”. [comment: what a pussy. if you're going to heckle, do so unapologetically ... especially if your sh*tty political party expels you for doing so. ]
“I’ve now been expelled from the Labour party. I've received a letter from this very shadowy unit called the constitutional unit," he said. [comment: all these pseudo left parties are cucked and f*cked: vote nationalist. ]
"And they have summarily expelled me without any opportunity to give my side, just based on media reports.”
He added: “They told me that my membership has not been accepted as a full member of the party...
“I’ve been a member for several months, so its not a matter of my membership being pending.
"This is something I'm going to challenge and I'm getting a lot of Jewish support."
Ms Smeeth said in a statement after the event that Mr Wadsworth had "used traditional anti-Semitic slurs to attack me for being part of a media conspiracy”. [comment: So simply being Jewish is some kind of an immunity from criticism and challenge magic shield? ]
“It is beyond belief that someone could come to the launch of a report on anti-Semitism in the Labour party and espouse such vile conspiracy theories about Jewish people.” [comment: if you just look at the BBC pro-Israel bias and Jewish top-down corporate cultural influence cited in the article below, and BBC's pro-Israel stance, Jewish influence of media is not some 'conspiracy theory'. And that's just the BBC: never mind the rest of it. ]
Human rights campaigner Shami Chakrabarti, who wrote the anti-Semitism report and was at yesterday's event, said Mr Corbyn shared her anger at what had happened.
She told Radio 4's Today programme: "I have been to see Ruth Smeeth and I've apologised to her because it was my press conference and I was chairing it and I'm really sorry she was treated in that way. [comment: WTF for? Politicians mustn't get heckled? So, being Jewish lends special protective cover to politicians? Why should Ruth Smeeth receive any special protections from being challenged? ]
"I was chairing the press conference and I probably didn't give [Jeremy] a chance to jump in because I was so quick to jump in.
"He concurred with me when I admonished the gentleman in question for heckling not just Ruth Smeeth but me and for abusing the privilege of asking a question at a national press conference and the leader concurred with me."
However Mr Corbyn was today reported to the Labour party by Jewish Human Rights Watch over his "conduct" at the launch. [comment: this is bullsh*t. I hate the Labour party, but this is a Jeremy Corbyn witch-hunt, probably led by the local Jews/Zionists and their allied non-Jew politician supporters of Israel, who probably want someone more favourably disposed to Israel heading up the British Labour Party (in the case of the former) and power (in the case of the latter, I guess)]
Jeremy Corbyn: Jews Must Not Be Blamed “for the Actions of Israel or the Netanyahu Government”
Guardian Sinks into Gutter on Corbyn – Again
By Jonathan Cook
Global Research, July 04, 2016
Jonathan Cook Blog 30 June 2016 This is way beyond a face-palm moment.
Jeremy Corbyn today launched a review into the Labour party’s supposed “anti-semitism crisis” – in fact, a crisis entirely confected by a toxic mix of the right, Israel supporters and the media. I have repeatedly pointed out that misleading claims of anti-semitism (along with much else) are being thrown at Corbyn to discredit him. You can read my criticisms of this campaign and Labour’s reponse here, here and here.
In his speech, Corbyn made an entirely fair point that Jews should not be blamed for the behaviour of Israel any more than Muslims should be for the behaviour of states that are Islamic. He said:
Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions of Israel or the Netanyahu government than our Muslim friends are for those of various self-styled Islamic states or organisations.
But no matter what he said, the usual suspects are now accusing him of comparing Israel with Islamic State, even though that is clearly not what he said – not even close.
First, even if he had said “Islamic State”, which he didn’t, that would not have meant he made a comparison with Israel. He was comparing the assumptions some people make that Jews and Muslims have tribal allegiances based on their religious or ethnic background. He was saying it was unfair to make such assumptions of either Jews or Muslims.[comment: of course he was; he's a Labour cuck, but those that want to oust him, won't let that stand in their way ... LOL.]
In fact, such an assumption (which Corbyn does not share) would be more unfair to Muslims than to Jews. It would suggest that some Muslims easily feel an affinity with a terror organisation, while some Jews feel an affinity with a recognised state (which may or may not include their support for the occupation). That assumption is far uglier towards Muslims than it is towards Jews. [comment: LOL ... it would depend on which side of the fence you stand on. I'm guessing that Arabs and cultural Arabs would see things otherwise. ]
But, of course, all of this is irrelevant because Corbyn did not make any such comparison. He clearly referred to “various self-styled Islamic states or organisations”. A spokesman later clarified that he meant “Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran or Hamas in Gaza”. In other words, “various self-styled Islamic states and organisations” – just as he said in the speech.
Surprise, surprise, the supposedly liberal Guardian’s coverage of this incident is as appalling as that found in the rightwing Telegraph. The Guardian has an article, quoting rabbis and others, pointing out the irony that Corbyn made an anti-semitic comment at the launch of an anti-semitism review – except, of course, that he didn’t.
In fact, contrary to all normal journalism, you have to read the Guardian story from bottom-up. The last paragraph states:
This story was amended on 30 June to correct the quotation in the second paragraph. An earlier version quoted Corbyn as saying: “Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions for the actions of Israel or the Netanyahu government than our Islamic friends are responsible for Islamic State.”
Or in other words, the Guardian reporterdid not even bother to listen to the video of the speech posted alongside her report on the Guardian’s own website. Instead she and her editors jumped on the same bandwagon as everyone else, spreading the same malicious rumours and misinformation. [COMMENT: That would be Harriet Sherwood 'religion correspondent' - here. Coincidentally, this same reporter was accused of being pro-Palestinian a few years ago, so there's no pleasing everybody as a reporter. But, yeah, fabrication is a bit much to swallow ... ]
When it later emerged that the story was a complete fabrication – one they could have proved for themselves had they listened to what Corbyn really said – they simply appended at the bottom a one-par mea culpa that almost no one will read. The Guardian has continued to publish the same defamatory article, one based on a deception from start to finish.
This is the very definition of gutter journalism. And it comes as the Guardian editor, Kath Viner, asks (begs?) readers to dig deep in their pockets to support the Guardian. She writes:
The Guardian’s role in producing fast, well-sourced, calm, accessible and intelligent journalism is more important than ever.
UK Labour head Jeremy Corbyn slams Israel in newly released letters June 1, 2016 5:03pm
Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn speaking after a 'Stop Trident' march though central London, Feb. 27, 2016. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
(JTA) — In letters sent to the foreign minister, the head of Britain’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, called for sanctions against Israel and described some of the Jewish state’s politicians as “criminals” who should be banned from Britain.
Corbyn’s anti-Israel letters, written while he was a Parliament member but before he was elected party chief, were obtained by the UK’s Jewish News through a Freedom of Information request. In an article published Wednesday, the Jewish News reported that Corbyn also saidIsrael treats Palestinians “with disdain” and that its “victimization of the people of East Jerusalem is an abomination.”
Corbyn already is under fire from British Jewish leaders who have voiced concerns that he is not doing enough to address anti-Semitism among party members.
News of the letters came on the same day a documentary on Corbyn aired showing him criticizing a Jewish journalist who wrote that the Labour Party has an anti-Semitism problem.
In one segment of “Jeremy Corbyn: The Outsider,” which was produced by Vice News, Corbyn describes a Guardian Op-Ed by Jonathan Freedland about Labour’s “anti-Semitism problem” as “Utterly disgusting, subliminal nastiness, the whole lot of it.” He adds that Freedland, who is also a columnist for London’s Jewish Chronicle, is “not a good guy at all. He seems kind of obsessed with me.”
According to the Jewish News, Corbyn in 2013called on then-Foreign Secretary William Haig to “stop allowing Israel’s criminal politicians to come to our country freely,” “end the siege of Gaza” and to “ensure the BBC portray Palestine fairly,” complaining that the national broadcaster “barely” mentioned “the Palestinian hunger strike!”
Many Jews and Israelis have accused the BBC of having a pro-Palestinian bias.
On the subject of banning Israeli politicians, Corbyn wrote: “I cannot help wondering how long successive governments are going to stand by pretending that an occupying power of so many years should be treated in the same way as the people whose land is not only occupied, but routinely confiscated.”
United Nations' rights envoy for Palestine resigns, accuses Israel of denying access to West Bank, Gaza
Posted 5Jan 2016, 6:28am
...
Makarim Wibisono, United Nations special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories, said his repeated oral and written requests for access had gone unanswered for over 18 months.
In a statement announcing his resignation, Mr Wibisono, who reports to the UN Human Rights Council, voiced "deep concern at the lack of effective protection of Palestinian victims of continuing human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law".
Israel has long rejected the post of the independent investigator for the territories, accusing the 47-member state forum of bias against the Jewish state, a position backed by its main ally the United States.
...
Mr Wibisono, a former Indonesian diplomat who took up the UN post in June 2014, said in his first report to the council in March 2015 that Israel should investigate the killing of more than 1,500 Palestinian civilians, one third of them children, during the 2014 Gaza war, and make the findings public.
...
His predecessor Richard Falk, an American law professor who is Jewish, long drew controversy in Israel.
In 2008 Mr Falk compared Israeli military strikes against Hamas in Gaza — during which 1,400 Palestinians were killed and there was widespread destruction in densely populated areas — to those of the Nazis.
Director of BBC television signs The Guardian’s pro-Israel letter
Amena Saleem Media Watch 29 October 2015
Director of BBC television Danny Cohen. (BBC Media Centre)
The BBC’s outgoing director of television has signed a letter published in The Guardian last week, pleading for Israel not to be singled out as a target for cultural boycotts.
Danny Cohen, a member of the BBC’s executive board and one of the most senior figures in the organization, joins top Israel apologists — including the chair of Conservative Friends of Israel and the vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel — in putting his name to the letter.
(The BBC recently announced that Cohen was to move on from his position at the BBC after eight years, but will retain his post through the end of November.)
The letter published in The Guardian states that “Cultural boycotts singling out Israel are divisive and discriminatory, and will not further peace,” and calls for “cultural engagement” in place of boycotts.
As Omar Robert Hamilton writes in Counterpunch: “When you’re dealing with the mechanized destruction of an entire people by one of the most technologically advanced and diplomatically shielded militaries in the history of mankind then talk, in 2015, of ‘cultural engagement’ is nothing more than further cover for Israel’s continuing colonization of what remains of Palestine.”
It is to this letter, and the highly politicized opinions within it, that the BBC’s director of television, whose salary is funded by license fee payers, has put his name.
In response to a query I sent, asking if Cohen is in breach of any BBC guidelines requiring employees to show impartiality regarding the situation in Palestine and Israel, the BBC Press Office sent this inconsequential reply: “Danny Cohen was expressing his view about his belief in the importance of creative freedom of expression.”
This is ridiculous.
The views expressed in the letter do not constitute a request for unfettered “creative freedom of expression” but are a plea for Israel to be protected from the consequences of its illegal occupation of Palestinian land and its siege on Gaza.
“Coexistence”
The letter also declares support for a new organization called Culture for Coexistence, whose committee includes at least one Israeli, but no Palestinians, and board members of Conservative Friends of Israel, but no one from a pro-Palestinian organization. The website itself is sparse, containing only the text of the letter to The Guardian and a list of committee members.
It looks suspiciously like a front for a bigger hasbara (or propaganda) organization.
Cohen’s fellow signatories to The Guardian letter include Eric Pickles MP, chair of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), a pro-Israel lobby group which, according to its website, “works to ensure that Israel’s case is fairly represented in Parliament.”
Another 13 members of parliament, apart from Pickles, have signed the letter. Seven of them are CFI’s parliamentary officers, five others are either members of CFI or have recently been on one of its delegations to Israel, and the 13th, Michael Dugher, is vice-chair of Labour Friends of Israel — the Labour Party’s equivalent group.
There are no pro-Palestinian MPs among the signatories.
Openly pro-Israel
There are former BBC employees on the signature list as well, including George Weidenfeld, who worked for the BBC Overseas Service, and is now vice-chair of the EU-Israel Forum. Weidenfeld also founded the eponymous Weidenfeld Safe Havens Fund, whose stated aim is to “rescue” Christians from Syria. The fund has received financial support from the Jewish National Fund, an organization essential to the continued ethnic cleansing of historical Palestine.
These signatories are openly pro-Israel. Cohen’s position at the BBC, however, requires neutrality. If he supports Israel in its suppression of the Palestinian people, those views should not be allowed to affect his work at the BBC. And yet, here he is, with others, very publicly arguing for a continuation of the status quo which favors the Israeli state against the occupied Palestinian people, employing vacuous terms such as “building bridges” to hide the fact that Israel is a serial violator of international law and Palestinian human rights, whose senior politicians openly declare that there will never be a Palestinian state.
It is a stupefying display of favoritism towards Israel from the BBC’s director of television, a man whose job supposedly demands impartiality.
Cohen’s influence within the BBC is huge.He oversees the BBC’s four main TV channels, BBC One, BBC Two, BBC Three and BBC Four, in addition to BBC iPlayer, and online content for BBC Television. He also oversees the drama, entertainment, knowledge and comedy genres and BBC Films. Further responsibilities include the BBC Television archive and BBC Productions, Europe’s largest television production group.
And his views on Israel and the occupation are now out in the open.
Shockingly, he is not the only senior figure at the BBC known for pro-Israel sympathies.
Endemic bias
The BBC’s director of news and current affairs, James Harding, once told a conference organized by the pro-Zionist Jewish Chronicle newspaper: “I am pro-Israel. I believe in the State of Israel.”
Speaking in 2011, when he was still editor of Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper The Times, Harding added, “I would have had a real problem if I had been coming to a paper with a history of being anti-Israel. And, of course, Rupert Murdoch is pro-Israel.”
Harding is responsible for the entirety of the BBC’s news and current affairs output across BBC radio, TV and online, including its current coverage of October’s violence in Palestine and Israel. The position he holds at the BBC is described by The Guardian as “arguably the most important editorial job in Britain.”
He came to the BBC in April 2013. There he joined James Purnell, who had been appointed two weeks earlier as the BBC’s director of strategy and digital. Purnell is a former Labour MP and minister who, for two years, served as chair of Labour Friends of Israel.
But the pro-Israel bias is not present only in the BBC’s current appointments. Another signatory of the letter in last week’s Guardian is Michael Grade, who served as chair of the BBC between 2004 and 2006.
Deep support for Israel
As well as calling for Israel to be protected from boycotts, Grade last week publicly complained that the BBC was too pro-Palestinian in its coverage of events in October which have seen at least 61 Palestinians killed in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, as well as 10 Israelis.
The Jewish Chronicle reported that Grade had written to the BBC’s director general, Tony Hall, accusing the BBC of failing to show stone-throwing Palestinians in its reports and creating an “equivalence between Israeli victims of terrorism and Palestinians who have been killed by Israeli security forces in the act of carrying out terror attacks.”
Ironically, as close monitoring by Palestine Solidarity Campaign has demonstrated, the BBC’s coverage in October has focused almost exclusively on Israeli stabbing victims, and its flagship radio news program Today has even attempted to fool its audiences into thinking that all those killed during October have been Israeli.
But it would seem that, whatever lengths the BBC goes to in order to present the occupying Israeli state as a victim, it can never go far enough for some who have worked at the organization.
It cannot be denied then that support for Israel runs deep through the top layers of BBC management, both past and present, and that support probably trickles down through the rest of the BBC as a matter of corporate culture.
This could explain why BBC editors failed to see the pro-Israel bias of commissioning historian Simon Schama to make a five part series for BBC Two in 2013, during which he made what he called “the moral case for Israel” and announced, in one episode, “I am a Zionist and quite unapologetic about it.”
Schama, unsurprisingly, joined Cohen in adding his name toThe Guardian letter on cultural boycotts.
Corporate culture
The same corporate culture could also explain why BBC Online’s Middle East editor, Raffi Berg, felt comfortable enough to send his colleagues an email during Israel’s November 2012 assault on Gazaasking them not to “put undue emphasis” on Israel for starting the prolonged attacks.
And it may explain why Cohen feels he cansign a letter in support of Israel without fear of reprisal from his bosses for breaching impartiality requirements.
Consumers of BBC news and current affairs may often wonder why the number of Israeli spokespersons appearing across the BBC’s output far outnumber Palestinian spokespersons, why Palestinians, when they do make a rare appearance, are constantly interrupted by BBC presenters, while Israelis such as diplomat Mark Regev are given free rein to speak almost without challenge.
They may wonder why the killing of Palestinian children by Israeli soldiers goes unreported by the BBC, while rockets fired from Gaza which cause damage to roads make headlines.
But, if the pro-Israeli views of those at the top of the BBC have created a corporate culture of pro-Israeli biasthroughout its editorial ranks, then such one-sided reporting, while disgraceful, should no longer come as a surprise to anyone.
Now I'm sorry I had a look at this dreary material. It's not at all straightforward, and I don't want to devote the next week or two unravelling the tangled web of finger-pointing, press and political 'outrage' & smear.
It's a huge time-waster, in politics, in media and in terms of public attention. This is ridiculous: it's just politics being hijacked and manufactured drama leveraging an attempt to get rid of British Labour's Jeremy Corbyn. Even though I hate the left, I'm opposed to this hijacking and power-grab in British politics, and am disgusted by the capitalist press that abets this circus.
Plus, pluralism isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Israel's right.
...
Have I got a Bibi fetish, or is Bibi naturally funny? He looks such a naughty, naughty Prime Minister ... LOL
Ken Livingston
nickname: 'Red Ken'
Labour Party ARTICLE - RT Tories seize on Zionism comments, unrepentant Livingstone sets out to foil newts
Published time: 29 Apr, 2016 12:08 EXTRACT
Anti-Semitism is an internal “virus” the Labour Party must treat, according to London Mayor Boris Johnson. But a defiantKen Livingstone says he will present evidence of his claims once he’s dealt with his garden pond.
The outgoing mayor appeared to be attempting to cast accusations of Labour anti-Semitism wider on LBC radio Thursday evening when he said that anti-Jewish prejudice is common in the party. [ie Johnson]
He opined that “there’s plainly some sort of virus of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party that needs to be addressed” before attempting to connect Labour’s mayoral candidate Sadiq Khanwith the row currently engulfingKen Livingstone.
“It seems to me there’s an ideological continuum between the views of Ken Livingstone about Israel and the position of Jeremy Corbyn and indeed the views of their candidate for London mayor, Sadiq Khan,” he said.
Johnson himself has repeatedly been cast as having dubious views on race. Last Friday he was attacked from political left and right for referring to US President Barack Obama’s Kenyan heritage.
The mayoral campaign run by his fellow Tory Zac Goldsmith has been accused of being colored by “dog whistle” Islamophobia in recent weeks.
For his part, Livingstoneremains unrepentant and, in his only direct comment on the issue to the Evening Standard on Friday morning, stated “everything I said yesterday was true and I will be presenting the academic book about that to the Labour Party inquiry.” [Comment: Got to be kidding. A time/resource wasting 'Labour Party inquiry' on this?]
The Standard speculated that the book in question was 2002’s ‘51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis’ by American-Jewish writer Lenni Brenner, which details the Haavara relocation accord struck between the Nazi regime and German Zionist leaders in 1933. ...
George Galloway says Livingstone 'zionist' suspension part of ‘slow motion coup’
Published time: 29 Apr, 2016 11:55
EXTRACT
London mayoral candidate George Galloway put forward a fiery defense of suspended Ken Livingstone, arguing the former mayor’s comments on a Nazi-Zionist accord on relocation were a matter of “historical fact.”
Speaking at length about the Haavara Agreement reached on 25 August 1933 between Germany’s Zionist leaders and its fascist politicians, Galloway told Sky News Livingstone had fallen victim to an “entirely synthetic crisis.”
“Ken Livingstone said absolutely nothing wrong, everything he said was the truth: historical fact, proven. I’ve got the books, so should you,” he argued.
It demonstrates the ludicrous lengths scumbag politicians will go to, to create a drama that smears and fetters their political opponents (who are just as unappealing as the finger-pointers), and how these politicians exploit the ignorance of the public to sway public opinion in favour of their political agendas.
In my view, it also demonstrates how mainstream politics is hijacked and dominated by minority interests.
Neither the left nor the right appeals. If I had to (hypothetically) pick, I'd probably go with the right, although they're despicable. But the tears-shedding universalist left are even more despicable. So the choice is: despicable or despicable.
While politicians on both sides are arguing nonsense, setting up nonsense inquiries, are highly invested in minority interests, and are publicly grovelling and appeasing one minority or other with regularity, who is prioritising the interests of ordinary Britons?
Does this Mirror article (here & below) strike anyone else as an unintentionally hilarious intended hit-piece on what is probably some very ordinary people in Scotland, who happen to be (a) nationalists, of a particular flavour, opposed to being displaced in their homeland, (b) likely working-class individuals or similar (and therefore very easy targets), and (c) perhaps members of a subculture (and, if so, one of generally limited appeal, for those not so into Third Reich insignia). Hey, what happened to all that 'diversity' and 'tolerance' preaching the press is always doing? Or is 'diversity' only desirable if it happens to be 'diversity' within the boundaries dictated by the ruling establishment and endorsed by the establishment press as approved ideology? Whatever the case may be, these lovers of verboten Third Reich symbolism and offensive names for pets, appear to have been surveilled by a Facebook group for years -- in addition to now being stalked by the effing Scottish mainstream tabloid press (owned by naughty British Trinity Mirror Group), that's reporting on various trivial, 'school-yard' details, of the lives of Scottish individuals who appear to be lawfully exercising their political and civil rights, in what presumably still play-acts as British 'democracy'. The Goliath that is the British press is abusing its power to harass ordinary Britons living their lives and exercising freedom of expression and political rights, simply because the journalists, editors or other figures associated with the British corporate press do not approve of the politics of these people.
Aside from being a disgusting beat up of ordinary people, it is laughable. Not only in terms of content, but also because: very, very, very few people would be drawn to a group whose members like to wear something that resembles balaclavas and sport visible tattoos, as it's a bit scary or otherwise off-putting for most people. So I'm going to guess that group membership is unlikely get to the point of a putsch in British parliament. In which case, why is the Goliath British press witch-hunting these people? I find the years-long ongoing surveillance of these individuals, whose private lives, misdemeanours and trivial preferences have now been combed over in British national newspapers (with global readership), far more interesting an event than the specifics of trivia hoovered from 'social media' entries by the press that proudly 'names and shames' subculture-identified ordinary working-class Scots, exercising civil and political rights (and perhaps what is a lifestyle choice of some kind. Or perhaps not. I'm not sure about that). Why is the British press dredging convictions of young women, at 16 or 18 years of age; what is the significance of the release-from-prison photo, aside from alerting us to the menace that is Facebook; and why does the public need to know that these women have children, what kind of pets they have, or who they're associated with? What the British press is doing is playing a very dangerous political suppression game that could end really badly if there's any religious or left-wing nutcases wanting to restore honour or utopian order, by attacking people who clearly object to invasion of their homeland, but do so within the limited dimensions of their social, educational and class opportunities and individual capabilities.
Attacks have happened before. European politicians have been killed for defending their homelands by leftie nutcases, and we know what the religious nuts are capable of: look at the artists in hiding from immigrant threats to life in their native Europe, the murdered film director who was skewered by an immigrant in broad daylight, and the British press have surely not forgotten Charlie Hebdo ... but if they have, there's bound to be another one somewhere down the track if anyone dares exercise freedom of expression, and the press can pretend it's an 'unexpected' tragedy.
However unsavoury the details recounted by the British press in relation to these individuals, something really politically sick and abusive is going on here in the British press.
It's an example of the harassment and smear that those who oppose invasion of their homelands can expect. Was that the intention, I wonder? Were the victims of the British press to serve as examples for all would-be members of such a group? Yeah, I'm going to guess that is exactly what it was, as there is a self-righteous reference to "named and shamed". So this is not only a deliberate exercise in harassment & political suppression of specific targets, it is an announcement of threat of consequence to others, in the form of violation of privacy by the press, on an international stage -- which makes it like an act of terrorism committed by the Goliath, privileged corporate press. Yes. It is an act of terrorism in support of invasion of Scotland and genocide of Scots, committed before a readership of 3.1 million (Daily Record, Scotland, alone), at last count. The only thing that is a shame here is that these working-class Scottish nationalist subculture lifestylers aren't anything like the separatist groups in Turkey, or the Greek group that took on the might of the American empire. Of course, the gutless British press has picked easy targets. A 16 year old 'hurler' of words & of verbal threat, who 'pushed' someone (context unknown), and a desecration-by-pork bandit. Whoever this group is, they're not exactly a force to be reckoned with. The only capable and serious nationalist group was one in Greece, that had a CIA guy skip the country, as he wasn't happy being the target of their then surveillance. But they're all locked up now. Even so, the 'name and shame' tabloid event will hardly deter lifestyle subculture nationalists, but newspaper coverage does raise the group's profile.
It's also a great tactic to discredit not only a particular group inclined towards nationalism, but also the entire spectrum of being identified as an indigenous European. However, anybody that wakes up in a country they no longer recognise or identify with, is so powerless to make any change -- let alone meaningful change -- that the hysteria surrounding European national identity, is itself rather ha-ha hysterical. Does anyone seriously expect these groups to overthrow the Scottish or British government? Even the IRA couldn't do that. Not that they were trying: I think they were just trying to get their country back from the British. And after all that IRA resistance to British rule and the sacrifice of Irish lives, the IRA are handing their country over to foreigners. So they must all be Marxist idiots, or they have just been conquered by global finance. Lifestyle choice 'neo-Nazi' or disaffected working-class groups couldn't even overthrow Trinity Mirror, for f%#@'s sake. The Trinity Mirror is an enormous corporate 'state'-like entity in the corporate sphere, with enormous human armies, vast assets and resources, an administrative structure much like a government of its own. Compared to even the Trinity Mirror, the individuals the British press has harassed for holding a particular political position are helpless lambs. Magnify that many, many times over to get a sense of how powerful the British state is, and how unlikely it is that someone tossing bacon and 'hurling' words will execute a successful British coup, or ever pose a threat to the 'free world', as the left-wing nutters like to think as they 'selflessly rescue' us with their form of fascist left-wing terrorism.
The same left that ignores the real threat to their nations, and the same left in service to powers that threaten their own, as well as the rest of the world (which the Western international capitalist elite propose to more completely control, economically and financially, than they already do, to the detriment of independent nation states and peoples around the world).
Oh, Jesus, I think we're prisoners of global finance and Five-Eyes. But I'm not quite sure yet. All I know is we're prisoners.
Anyway, as the individuals targeted by the British press make no secret of their inclinations or their activities, and as they appear to be acting within the law and exercising their democratic rights, how is this media attention a 'press-worthy' exposé. Oh, wait. It's not. It doesn't even pretend to me. The establishment stenographer boasts of 'naming and shaming', like maybe the Stasi would have done. What gives the British press the right to abuse their Goliath corporate power and privileged press position to harass ordinary working-class Scottish nationalists? So these people sign off using numerals. But the Third Reich is a faint ghost.
The heart of Europe was ripped out, then hollowed, and has been held in US-Anglo captive grip since WWII.
The bet is that the same British press didn't comb over the details of the (raped, beaten, doused in petrol victim) Rotherham rapists' extended families to give us the 'name and shame' personal low-down. And they are certainly shy about combing over the family and domestic details of psycho left storm-troopers, to publicly 'name and shame' them and their families on a national and international level. Oh, but why would they? The left serves a useful purpose, as shock-troops and propagandists of the establishment. And we are, after all, talking about the media tool of the monied classes, who do not share the circumstances or concerns of the common man; a press that is apparently aligned with the Labour sell-outs, in this case (but politicians of all flavours probably all play for the same corporate team); and a moralising press convicted of phone hacking. So this finger-wagging corporate press is hardly a sterling moral example. Nor is the British state that has undermined the interests of working-classes in a number of respects, for decades since working-class British sons gave their lives to defend the hegemony of the British elite's trading empire. It is an establishment press associated with supporting the status quo, and the political parties are, by and large, interchangeable.
How preposterous is a 'Labour' party associated with a massive capitalist-controlled and capitalist agenda serving press entity, that is no doubt yet another enthusiastic propagandist of socially 'progressive' or 'culturally Marxist', utopian universalist 'international community' approved ideology. Prevailing ideology that's inherently detrimental to the interests of indigenous Europeans — a Labour left that's paired with the interests of capitalism per se, and therefore the interests of its privileged sponsors.
The individual demographic dismemberment within indigenous European nations in Europe is mirrored in territorial dismemberment of Europe:
by US-NATO dispossession of Kosovo from Serbia, so US-Anglo elites could profit materially and strategically/militarily from appropriating Serbian Kosovo; and
by American capitalist appropriation of destitute Slavic Ukraine, which has been turned against its Slavic Russian brothers and fellow indigenous Europeans.
It looks like someone decided the plebs can have all the Marxism they can stomach, plus generous serves of more of the same, like it or not, backed by the might of the powerful capitalist corporate sector (and capitalist-serving public sector) that is now chief 'moral guide' and propagandist while the 'liberated', 'egalitarian' and 'non-religious' European 'Western'-identified state, on the one hand, pays homage to religious superstition (religion which is, in fact, a political tool); and a 'Western'-identified state that dispossesses its own, that has, on the other hand, now found an additional new secular, 'selfless', self-sacrificing, self-erasing, capitalist propagandist religion in the form of 'liberalism', 'humanism', 'humanitarianism' and 'democracy' spreading, cynically employed on a worldwide Western capitalist exploiter 'crusade' basis, abetted by useful idiot imperialist tools that have been indoctrinated to surrender to this 'humanist' branded order-the-world in America's capitalist media propagandised, idealised and commercialised self-image. Hypocritical and cynically employed without a doubt, as evidenced by the harm perpetrated in the name of this 'selfless' capitalist 'new religion' and the harm committed against the vital interests of indigenous European domestic populations.
Dismemberment of Indigenous Europe by Capitalist Immigration-State Program
The masses may have Marxism, as long as it is capitalist serving, 'universal' social order promoting, globalisation-promoting, socially 'progressive', social or 'cultural Marxism' that does not, in fact, represent the vital interests of indigenous Europeans, or maintain the political power of the indigenous Europeans, who are denied pre-eminence in their own societies and therefore denied actual tribal or collective indigenous European national self-determination, in what is the demographically, socially, culturally, politically, and otherwise, transformed (dismembered) immigration state.
Dismemberment of indigenous Europe — demographically, socially and politically — produces a weakened, easy-to-manage and interchangeable-at-will international labour pool and capitalist warehouse of consumers, in place of what once was indigenous European society, and a potentially formidable social and political force, of what were sovereign European nation states capable of defending their territory and borders.
Today, it is the American oligarchy's NATO military that is the occupying force in Europe: a Europe that 'cannot' even defend her own borders.
Mandated Invasion
Dismemberment of Indigenous Europe
The supranational EU border 'guard' joke that is Frontex, delivers boatloads of invaders to European shores while European political leaders hold the usual going-nowhere meetings and sit on their hands. Meanwhile, it is US-NATO that sucks up 2% of British national GDP (alone), that does nothing to protect the European public ... 'Protect' the public? As if ... this is US-Anglo mandated invasion of Europe.
It is NATO, the US-Anglo capitalist imperialist controllers' agent, that is responsible for:
an occupying force on the European mainland, installed to control the domestic populations of Europe, should the need arise to deploy force to keep domestic populations of vassal European states in line (while invoking the capitalist controlled media propagandist manufactured 'threat' of Russia, even as it is the NATO military installing itself on Russia's borders);
responsible for destabilising entire regions, destroying sovereign, organised states; sponsoring and igniting internal armed conflicts; civil war; sectarian war; and responsible for the attack on multiple sovereign states in the Middle East and in Africa; manifesting a trail of destruction and a series of broken states; and, to a great extent, therefore also responsible for the broken dam that is mass alien population transfer to Europe (packaged as a 'humanitarian' program, when this is nothing but an invasion and deliberate program of dismemberment of indigenous Europe, that serves the wider objectives of the US-Anglo capitalist agenda).
And it is the US-NATO puppet that is the European Union (EU) that is responsible for inviting the whole of the Middle East, Africa and beyond to (sovereign state erasing) Schengen open-borders & crossed-legs Europe, in what is undoubtedly an organised invasion of Europe being implemented by the European authorities under the noses of the harassed and dispossessed European public.
CAPITALIST PROPAGANDA
'CHANCELLOR OF THE FREE WORLD'
OPPOSITION to Dismemberment of Indigenous Europe "HIER IST DAS VOLK" HERE ARE THE PEOPLE
2010 Admission US-Anglo- US-NATO-EU PUPPET 'HEAD' OF OCCUPIED GERMANY
[The Guardian, 2010] [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE]
US-ANGLO & ALLIED CAPITALIST MANUFACTURED 'CRISIS' EXPLOITED TO HASTEN PLANNED DISMEMBERMENT OF INDIGENOUS EUROPE
The invitation to invade Europe reaction to what is the US-Anglo manufactured refugee 'crisis', is portrayed in the controlled, propaganda disseminating Western media, as if this is mere 'reaction' to an 'accident' and 'unexpected' event that is a 'crisis' by-chance occurrence and one that 'demands' indigenous Europe take 'moral' responsibility, according to the propagandists.
Media and politician propagandists present this as if the follow-on program of invasion of indigenous Europe were a legitimate 'decision' by chief EU 'humanitarian' Mutti Angela Merkel of Germany (the US-Anglo empire's fall guy or scapegoat), as 'head' of the European Union and the next Blessed Mutti Teresa icon of progressively dismembered indigenous Europe.
It is a portrayal that's beyond absurd, when one is mindful of the fact that Germany is not a sovereign state and has not been since WWII. Germany is a defeated & occupied nation in the gouged out heart of Europe. Germany, occupied by the American & British capitalists' militaries since WWII, remains occupied militarily, economically, financially, ideologically, culturally and politically, and the likes of Angela Merkel are mere puppets of foreign capitalism.
Manufactured 'crisis' because mass population displacement is the inherent and expected consequence of US-Anglo & allied capitalists backing terrorists in a region, destabilising entire regions, destroying functioning states, destroying infrastructure etc, promoting sectarian or civil conflict, waging war illegally, and destroying a series of functioning foreign states over a decades long campaign of American-Anglo empire capitalist war of aggression. It is the American-Anglo & allied capitalist war machine that is manufacturing what it casts as 'humanitarian' or 'refugee' 'crisis'; while exploiting public sympathy to wage not only war abroad, but to also wage a war of invasion and genocide on indigenous Europe.
It is this capitalist war machine that has not planned for the inherent chaos and displacement the imperialists and their warmonger advisers knew would be the outcome of serial capitalist power aggression and multiple-regions destabilisation, by either providing assistance for the victims of their assaults and destabilisation plots in situ, regionally, or having their immensely wealthy Saudi Arabian and Gulf Arab co-conspirators assume responsibility for the consequences of war waged in favour of these Arabs, across what is two continents, and spreading to a third: Europe.
Germany is Not a Sovereign State
Dr. Wolfgang Schauble Minister of Finance Occupied Germany
Anyone that doesn't believe the invasion of Europe is organised is a moron. Just look at the discarded life vests. Hundreds and hundreds of life jackets discarded. As if 'people smugglers' (essentially criminals) take care with 'packaging' the deliveries.
Blame the robber-capitalist, blame the indoctrinated institutions; blame the intelligentsia prostitutes of capitalist patrons; blame the controlled corporate press; and blame the ideologically captured and otherwise compromised (alienated from indigenous working-classes) leftist advocates of universal Marxism, who have abandon indigenous European working-classes, allowing the ruling elites to continue to carry out the program of invasion, indigenous European displacement, indigenous European political suppression, and genocide, unopposed.
The bitter fruits of political and social betrayal are most conspicuous in what may be irreversible social and demographic change that has been deliberately forced on Europeans by the ruling capitalist elite's systemic program of supplanting indigenous Europeans, in ongoing decades-long pursuit of policy imposing mass non-European population transfer. Again, a program that is fully supported by what once was the working-class left of politics, as well as supported by the distasteful other flavours of capitalist benefactor sponsored mainstream liberal-leftist leaning political parties. Parties that been advanced in tandem with the Western intelligentsia's culturally Marxist ideology-bound and otherwise fettered, progressively Stalinist *capitalist* utopia.
All the mainstream political parties are on-board with the agenda to continue to maintain the dispossession of European ancestral lands, right under the people who are are (and will continued to be), dispossessed and voiceless in the face of ongoing dispossession. Perversely, dispossessed by the policies of those elected to serve their interests, acting together with powerful corporate interests, corporate media, intelligentsia, unions, and the church (to name a few of the dispossession of indigenous Europeans stakeholders). In the case of the capitalists, dispossession of the native population for profits is the motivation: the invasion provides abundant and therefore cheap labour, the invasion drives down wages, the invasion provides all-important consumers. The invasion will result in winding back of the welfare state, as nobody cares to support those that are not their kind. An invasion agenda that fits with the wider push for 'global markets' and the dismantling of nation states agenda, as it fractures or weakens the native population, thereby politically weakening the downward-spiralling native population (with its persistent and annoying attachment to the nation state), ensuring that establishment of rule by global capital (in place of the nation state) is not challenged.
The more I look at this, the more disgusted I feel. It is no mere accident that demographers and economists may have overlooked and failed to predict. It is no labour market 'gap', it is no program for 'temporary' foreign workers, and it is no 'refugee crisis', or any other excuse the political scum have used over the decades of dispossessing the people who have been robbed of their heritage.
The prospect of future survival of indigenous Europe has been deliberately destroyed by ruling capitalist elites, who DID NOT:
(a) ensure protection of European society; and
(b) management of regeneration of Europeans at optimum levels;
through implementation of timely public policy and incentives.
The above is the least they could have done, had they any sense of responsibility for the future of their own people.
[CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE]
The political scum representing capitalists have invested minimally in the actual betterment, welfare, advancement and vital interests of their own people -- people they have robbed and sold into slavery as debt-slaves to pay for wars abroad and to finance a population explosion of consumers abroad for the benefit of ruling and allied capitalists -- and these fine specimens of capitalist state selflessness, generosity and 'value adding', expect us to believe in their 'humanist', 'humanitarian', 'liberal', 'democracy' spreading, and 'selfless'virtue & rescuing rort, even as they have manifested nothing but chaos, torture, murder, misery and capitalist exploitation abroad for decades of post-WWII US-Anglo mayhem, while simultaneously destroying indigenous Europe.
Europeans have been abandoned by the leaders of their nations, who have chosen to neglect vital interests of indigenous Europeans, in favour of serving capitalist interests, not only by taking an easier and cheaper option in the immediate, but by implementing a conscious & deliberate plan of destruction of Europe & Europeans: that of importing an aliendemographic that portends the end of ancestral Europe and the end of indigenous European cultures.
It is deliberate genocide of European peoples
It is deliberate genocide of European peoples
What's in it for the pseudo 'left' of politics that has remained silent while Europe was being murdered?
It probably comes down to personal rewards first and foremost. And then there's the loonies.
So while the left of mainstream politics is on-board with capitalist agenda and fully supportive of what is essentially invasion of indigenous European societies, who is there to speak for ordinary working-class Europeans that have no desire to live among foreigners, or to surrender their nations to foreigners that displace them? I'm guessing that there is very few mainstream voices that genuinely and exclusively represent the interests of European working classes. Those that ought to represent such interest are Marxist weirdos much like religious masochists, who represent the interest of foreigners and pursue a universal path, snaking its way to capitalist globalisation heaven. It is not in the interests any European (or their descendants) to surrender their nation and their heritage to immigrants or to bend to foreign rule. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that there is objection to doing so and objection to living among foreigners, without intent or consent. Like US-NATO military encroachment on Russia's borders in eastern Europe, the American aggressors insist it's the Russians that are 'aggressive' (so as to 'rationalise' and effectively propagandise aggressive US-NATO American empire initiated NATOexpanding occupation of Europe), it is indigenous Europeans that are branded 'aggressive' and 'extremist' when responding to existential threat & significantthreat to vital interests. But it's not the native populations that have moved into the habitat of the foreign populations, just as it's not Russia moving into America's neighbourhood: it is the reverse. It is an invasion and invasions by their very nature are an act of aggression that is, naturally, opposed by any healthy population. Nobody — no matter what their motivation or method of implementation (including any illegitimate modern government legislative or vote process) — has the right to impose on Europeans, what is invasion of ancestral European lands and societies. No government decision, international law or public vote is legitimate, as no law or vote can represent the ancestors of indigenous European man whose remains comprise the soil that is Europe, which soil capitalist-interests-serving European politicians have desecrated. Nor can any such illegitimate modern government decision take into account the wishes of the unborn descendants of European man. That is why what is ancestrally European is sacrosanct and non-transferable. And this invasion is exactly what the mainstream political parties support, and exactly what the groups claiming to be 'anti-racist' support. What they support is invasion of indigenous Europe, dismemberment of indigenous Europe, and genocide of indigenous Europeans. Europeans who represent a mere 7% or so of the entire world's population — and probably less than that, when you consider that this is likely to be an all-in (foreign and indigenous) count, in a Europe that is ever so careful not to keep proper statistics as to the make-up of the artificial societies that are being superimposed on the native population, by mass immigration. With all this in mind, it's hard to see why members of the 'vigilant' public and the establishment feel motivated to draw attention to the Scottish working-class subculture nationalist group. It's not as if this tiny group are some 'threat', when the actual threat is what this group opposes: invasion of their Scottish ancestral lands. Bear in mind, also, that these groups are already being harassed and suppressed by the British police blocking attendance to marches, and most likely setting up the attendance of counter-demonstration useful-idiot harassment teams, every time the nationalist groups register an intent to march. Registration was introduced after the left rioted in London during Mosley's time, before WWII, I think it was. Guess the British police figured it's easier to subvert dissenting groups if such groups must make an appointment with the police in advance, to exercise what ought to be unencumbered civil and political freedoms. The British police are also quite adept at harassing groups such as this by charging them with whatever 'public nuisance' excuses they can find to violate the civic and political rights of those who at least have the sense to recognise invasion of their ancestral lands.
As for those that suffered and died during WWII, I somehow don't think they would actually be pleased that their ancestral lands have been opened by capitalist to foreign invasion and dispossession of their descendants, in what is systemic, organised dismemberment of indigenous European peoples and nations.
PS: When last did the filthy capitalist press write, "extremism is in the pair’s genes", referring to maybe the Rotherham rapists or any other foreigners?
War Bonnet
Do wonder if I have an overly romanticised view of Europe or not ... but I can't shake the vision of destruction.
I wonder if Europe will quietly submit to the forces of capitalism, or if Europeans will resist becoming the next North American Indians.
Chelsea Lambie, 20, and her older sister, Samantha, 25, both appear on online propaganda posters promoting neo-Nazi causes
[photgraphs] caption: "Chelsea and Samantha Lambie are poster girls for a sickening neo-Nazi movement "
These blonde-haired sisters have become poster girls for a neo-Nazi movement - with one even having served jail time for desecrating a mosque.
Chelsea Lambie, 20, and her sibling Samantha, 25, are at the forefront of Scottish Defence Leaguerace-hate campaigns, the Daily Record reports.
They both idolise Hitler, are engaged to men who support the league's right-wing bigots and appear on online propaganda posters promoting neo-Nazi causes.
Chelsea, who once called an Asian shopkeeper a 'black b*****d, even lists her interests on social media as 'blowing up mosques'.
While the younger of the pair has been jailed for crimes against Muslims, her older sister brandishes bigoted banners at anti-refugee marches. [photograph] caption: "One of the siblings brandishes a bigoted sign at an anti-refugee protest"
The siblings, who are both mums, have been named and shamed by the Record today as poster girls for Scotland's neo-Nazi movement. When Chelsea was 16, she was fined for hurling racist abuse at the Asian shopkeeper, as well as pushing him and threatening to slit his throat.
Two years later, aged 18, she became a cause celebre for the European neo-Nazi movement when she was jailed for desecrating an Edinburgh mosque by throwing pork into the place of worship and wrapping strips of bacon on the door handles.
On her release from Cornton Vale jail near Stirling, Chelsea's father proudly posted pictures of Chelsea and her son outside the prison with the caption “Freedom!”.
Samantha, 25, who refers to refugees as rapists, is a regular at SDL marches, where she proudly poses for the cameras as she brandishes banners bearing bigoted slogans.
Mari McKinlay, who helps run the Scotland United Against the Racist SDL page on Facebook, said: “Samantha Lambie is an eye-catching young woman but there are some ugly views behind the pretty face.
“Samantha has been pictured in a T-shirt bearing the badge of the SS unit responsible for administering Hitler’s concentration camps. It is hard to get more sickening and offensive than that.”
Samantha has posted pictures adorned with symbols of Nazi death masks and the insignia of white supremacists.
Chelsea lists her favourite book as Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
Extremism is in the pair’s genes.Their parents Craig and Ann Marie were named on an alleged list of supporters of Blood and Honour, a neo-Nazi organisation.
Ann Marie knits disgusting golliwog baby blankets and her email is dessa 1488.
[photograph] caption: "Chelsea is seen on her release from prison with her dad, Craig, and her son"
Dessa is a reference to the Nazis’ underground network Odessa and 1488 is a combination of two popular white supremacist numeric symbols.
The first symbol is 14, which is shorthand for the “14 Words” slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”
The second is 88, which stands for “Heil Hitler”, H being the eighth letter of the alphabet.
Even Craig’s pitbull is named Dessa. Abhorrent pet names are the Lambies’ idea of a joke. Chelsea's cat is called C***, a highly offensive term for black people.
Chelsea’s fiance is Josh Wood, who has an SDL tattoo.
He attends SDL rallies, refers to Muslims as scum and jokes about burning mosques and having a party when all Muslims die.
Samantha refers to black people as n*****s and signs off posts with the Heil Hitler reference 88.
[photograph] caption: "Samantha with her fiance, Ryan McCue, who likes to be known as Ryan McCrusadersdl"
Among her “likes”, she lists the British Movement Scotland, a white supremacist organisation, and Fascist is a Gentleman, who idolise fascist leaders Mussolini, Mosley and Hitler.
Samantha is engaged to Ryan McCue, one of the SDL’s inner circle and most enthusiastic activists.
He is a white supremacist and follower of the National Front and groups including White and Proud.
Samantha and Ryan have fronted SDL anti-refugee marches in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Dumfries.
She also attended a rally in support of the Greek neo-Nazi movement Golden Dawn.
Mari added: “In the years we have been monitoring the SDL’s activities, we have seen a lot of people come and go. But Samantha seems to have been a constant and in fact she and her partner Ryan McCue currently seem to be central figures.
“The SDL as an organisation are all about hate, which is mainly directed at people of the Muslim faith.
“On top of that, there are a number of people at their core who also hold racist and neo-Nazi views, including, it would appear, Samantha and her partner.
“The SDL claim to be supporters of those serving in our armed forces. They make a big thing of Remembrance Day, while at the same time some of them are glorifying Nazism and Hitler. It’s a huge insult to those who suffered and died fighting the Nazis during World War II.” http://archive.is/fP6qM#selection-2079.0-2091.272
Daily Record (Scotland) part of: Trinity Mirror
Scottish tabloid newspaper: Glasgow
sister paper: Sunday Mail
leading news brand Scotland: a total audience of 3.1 million
compared to:
-- The Scottish Sun - 1.41 million
-- The Scotsman - 1.13 million
purchased by Trinity Mirror in 1999
{from estate of Robert Maxwell}
continues to support the Labour Party & has close relationship with it
opposes both:
-- Scottish National Party (SNP)
-- Scottish independence
-- 2007 Scottish Parliament election: ran a front-page editorial attacking SNP
Murray Foote
-- editor, 2014
-- close relationship b/w -- Daily Record journalists & Labour Party politicians in Scotland -- revolving door between newspaper staff & Labour advisers
-- Scottish Labour Leader Kezia Dugdale - weekly columnist every Monday
-- relationship with a woman as of 2016
-- member of Unite the Union and the Community trade union
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kezia_Dugdale
Daily Record + Brian Souter ran keep S. 28 campaign
-- law prevented authorities from promoting homosexuality as a family relationship in state schools
-- law eventually repealed in Scotland in 2000 in Scottish Parliament
-- repealed in England & Wales 2003
-- Scottish businessman and philanthropist
-- large number of private investments, managed by his company, Souter Investment
2000: Scottish govt
-- planning to abolish S. 28 laws forbidding local authorities from intentionally promoting homosexuality
-- Souter: spent over £1 million on the first privately funded postal referendum across Scotland to gauge public opinion
-- committed Christian & father motive -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keep_the_Clause_campaign
-- Souter is a major financial supporter of the Scottish National Party (SNP)
-- 2014 that Souter had donated £1 million to the campaign for Scottish independence
-- charitable trust since 1992, humanitarian projects UK & abroad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Record_%28Scotland%29
Trinity Mirror largest British newspaper, magazine and digital publisher
Britain's biggest newspaper group, publishing 240 regional papers + national papers:
Daily Mirror
Sunday Mirror
People
Sunday Mail (Scotland)
Daily Record (Scotland) HQ Canary Wharf London Listed on London SX
Phone Hacking
24 September 2014, Trinity Mirror
-- admitted some of its journalists had been involved in phone hacking
-- admitted liability & agreed to pay compensation
-- earlier settled x6 other phone hacking claims
-- 2014, further 19 claims registered at High Court & another 10 claimants
-- High Court in London heard 2015
-- one Mirror group journalist hacked phones of some 100 celebrities every day
-- 2015 damages totalling nearly £1.25m awarded to x8 result of phone hacking by Mirror Group journalists
-- further x10 cases had been settled
-- approximately another 70 other claims outstanding
-- Mirror Group increased allotment (£12m to £28m) re pending phone hacking claims -- x9 press sites throughout the UK
-- incl. x36 major newspapers
Key people
David Grigson (Chairman of the board)
Simon Fox (CEO)
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
... 
