TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  
Showing posts with label Humanitarian Aid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Humanitarian Aid. Show all posts

September 22, 2015

Syrian Regime Change - Humanitarian Aid

Article
SOURCE
https://fts.unocha.org/pageloader.aspx?page=search-reporting_display&CQ=cq260115191009dOLEaWyOry



2012-2015 Syria Total:  
USD $14,343,463,267 (committed) 
  + USD$  743,800,39 (Pledged)




USD Committed
USD Pledged
Australia
149,082,851
15,725,518
Canada
517,298,762
EU Comm
1,573,770,779
Finland
61,083,566
France
106,524,427

Germany
969,788,332
Kuwait
938,412,017
219,390,000
Qatar
235,579,649
3,803,270
Saudi Arabia
586,481,638

Sweden
170,721,978
Switzerland
175,307,558
1,142,037
UAE
417,971,494
126,192,450
UK
1,393,325,651

USA
4,226,880,211
13,320,001


---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
COMMENT

Regime change and eradicating 'moderate rebels' defected to 'death cult' militants is expensive.

Check out what the US, UK and EU have spent.  Yes, I know this is allocated as 'humanitarian aid' -- but the 'humanitarian crisis' is the result of Western intervention in pursuit of regime change in more than one target location, including Syria.

Above is only some of the funds committed by various governments.

Jordan and Israel are not on the list.

Expect that this isn't a complete list of everything.

The British domestic population is subjected to 'austerity' measures, but Britain has allocated this substantial expenditure  towards what amounts to one of the incidental costs of regime change.
Money's also found for other countries -- so this isn't the only overseas location that funds are allocated to.  
Global Humanitarian Contributions in 2014, top donors:
  • United States
  • European Commission
  • United Kingdom
  • Germany
  • Japan
  • Sweden
US is right up there, just as it is in terms of military spending.  The top spenders also form part of the US alliance, which I think is interesting.  The respective economies may also factor in somehow (not sure re Sweden) -- banking interests/investors - invested?

There's a reason US is on top of that list, and it's not generosity -- look what's happening with water shut-downs in the US and the fight for minimum wage that is still on.
Countries that 'cannot' find adequate money for their pensioners, unemployed, care homes, public housing, education, and so on, and  countries that are selling off public property, healthcare, and shutting off water to domestic communities; countries that begrudge their domestic population minimum wage etc etc, find money for mid-intervention and post intervention humanitarian 'mop-ups' overseas.
Grand total of USD$23,276,994,829 in 2014 (plus some) -- all contributors worldwide- here.
But this isn't everything.  It's just what they classify as 'humanitarian aid' ... and it may not even be all 'humanitarian aid'.

At USD$267,063,481, Australia contributes more in the 2014 overall totals than France, more than World Bank and more than Qatar (which probably owns Europe).
Meanwhile in Australia (as an example):

‘Devastating’ Social Service Funding Cuts Slammed


A Senate Inquiry has slammed the Department of Social Service funding process which saw cuts of $270 million and has recommended that five-year contracts be awarded to service providers to ensure stability.
http://www.probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2015/09/%E2%80%98devastating%E2%80%99-social-service-funding-cuts-slammed#
I'm not up on all the Liberal government's social welfare reforms (ie punishment of the vulnerable), so I've just plucked the above as an example.

While welfare is getting cut, the military spending looks sizeable (from the random examples).

Australia has invested approximately AU$1billion in Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS)  -- which is some kind of military satellite communications gadgetry from US supplier -- here.

Australia is spending $50 billion on a submarine-building program -- here.

Australia is carrying out airstrikes in Syria and Iraq -- here.  No mention of what these cost, but I'm pretty sure this doesn't come cheaply.

Australia:  Boeing (USA) $1.49 billion 13 Poseidon maritime surveillance aircraft contract - here.

Australia -  $11.9 million Orbital ATK Inc. (USA) - Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile conversion service - here.

Australia - new defence planning blueprint seeks to fortify seas defences with highest priority to Navy - drones & subs - $70 billion boost - here.

Anyway, that some of what money was found for. 
Yes, defence is important, but surely a government spending colossal amounts on military can shop around or drive a hard enough bargain with suppliers (who want their money), so as to ensure that the people at the very bottom socially and economically do not become victims of government spending cut-backs.

How is punishing the domestic population -- the vulnerable, at the very bottom of the social and economic ladder -- the right thing to do?





Well, it looks like the domestic population -- especially the socially and economically disadvantaged -- are of the least concern to politicians.

It's private profits first.  Working classes (and even nations) last.

Look at European politicians selling out their nations.




---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------

Spend Theory (so far)
War: Sanitisation & Maintenance of Illusions
Link  |  here




Assange
Transnational Security Elite,
Carving Up the World Using Your Tax Money

London 
OCT8 Antiwar Mass Assembly (2011)
Link  |  here






March 16, 2015

HRW - UKRAINE GOVT CONTRIBUTED TO SERIOUS DELAYS, DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN & MEDICAL AID


HRW - UKRAINE GOVT CONTRIBUTED TO SERIOUS DELAYS, DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN & MEDICAL AID
Ukraine: Civilians Struggle to Get Medical Care
All Sides Should Ensure Delivery of Aid to Civilians in Rebel-Held Areas
March 13, 2015

A woman standing in front of a bomb shelter in Petrovsky district of Donetsk, area of Trudovskaya mine, where locals have been hiding from attacks since August. February 9, 2015. © 2015 Dmytry Belyakov
    © 2015 Dmytry Belyakov

(Berlin) – Travel restrictions imposed by the government of Ukraine have contributed to serious delays in the delivery of humanitarian aid, particularly medicines and medical equipment, to civilians in rebel-controlled areas of eastern Ukraine, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch released a video based on interviews with medical personnel and patients in eastern Ukraine.

The restrictions also seriously impede access to health care for civilians from rebel-controlled areas who need to use state-funded medical services available only in government-controlled areas, Human Rights Watch said. Human Rights Watch also found that patients receiving treatment for HIV, tuberculosis (TB), and opioid substitution therapy (OST) are facing interruptions of life-saving treatment.

“Delays in delivering medicines, combined with a pass system and military hostilities, have created massive shortages at medical facilities,” said Yulia Gorbunova, Europe and Central Asia researcher at Human Rights Watch. “This is jeopardizing the lives of people with serious medical conditions and others who need medical assistance in rebel-controlled areas.”

Human Rights Watch spent three days in Kiev and seven days in the Donetsk region interviewing, in person or by phone, doctors and other health workers, patients, local residents, volunteers, and members of independent humanitarian groups that provide humanitarian aid to conflict-affected areas.

In a March 9, 2015 letter to Ukrainian officials, Human Rights Watch asked the Ukrainian government to ensure that its restrictions on movement in and out of areas not under government control do not adversely affect the health of the civilian population.

Several local and international humanitarian organizations told Human Rights Watch that since January, they have experienced restrictions and delays when trying to move medicines and medical equipment that are essential for the health of the civilian population into rebel-controlled areas. In some cases these restrictions and delays did not appear to be justified on security grounds, Human Rights Watch said.

In November 2014, the Ukrainian government stopped providing funding for government services and social benefit payments – including budgets for hospitals, pensions, and social security – in rebel-controlled areas. Civilians have to travel to government-controlled territories to get their social benefits. In January 2015, the government also began to enforce travel regulations that require civilians to obtain a special pass to move between rebel-controlled and government-controlled territories. Human Rights Watch found that rebel forces, who exercise effective control over areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, have failed to fill the gap left by the withdrawal of state funding for services and payments from rebel-held areas. People in rebel-controlled areas who need state-funded treatment now have to travel to government-controlled territory, but are often unable to, either because they do not have the financial and other resources to travel and register in government-controlled areas, they have to provide care for sick or elderly family members who are not able to travel, or they fear injury or worse due to the hostilities.  [Think it rather unrealistic to expect people defending a territory to suddenly begin administering an efficient welfare providing state, while under military fire from the Ukraine govt.]

All parties to the conflict should uphold their obligations under international humanitarian law and their commitments under the February 13 Minsk ceasefire agreements to ensure access to humanitarian relief for civilians who need it, Human Rights Watch said.

The Ukrainian government has the right to control movement in and out of rebel-controlled areas, but all parties to the conflict must allow and facilitate the rapid and unimpeded access for impartial humanitarian relief for civilians in need, Human Rights Watch said. Consent for access to humanitarian operations cannot be withheld for arbitrary reasons, and neither side should seek to impose intolerable conditions on the civilian population as a tactic of war.  [Obviously it can be, if you're sneaky & want to use harm to civilians as a tactic - and that would be the Ukraine govt tactic, as the civilians being referred to here are east Ukraine ethnic Russian civilians.]

The government also maintains its obligations under international human rights law to respect the right to health and other economic and social rights, as well as rights such as freedom of movement for the civilian population. This includes, in particular, rights provided for in the treaties to which it is a party, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

In areas under effective control of rebel forces, those forces have the primary responsibility to ensure that civilians have humanitarian essentials, including medical supplies, Human Rights Watch said. And, while the Ukrainian government has no obligation under international humanitarian law to provide direct financial assistance to authorities operating under the control of rebels, its human rights obligations to the civilian population do not cease due to the current conflict.

In its letter, Human Rights Watch said the Ukrainian government and de facto authorities in rebel-controlled areas should not impede humanitarian assistance and should facilitate access to it for civilians in need. The government of Ukraine and rebel forces controlling those areas should issue instructions to troops and forces staffing checkpoints, and their commanders, to ensure that delivery of medication and medical assistance for civilians in rebel-controlled areas are not subject to arbitrary or unreasonable delays, in line with humanitarian law and the Minsk agreements.

“Some of the most vulnerable civilians in rebel-controlled areas have no choice but to rely on humanitarian groups for certain medications and medical services,” Gorbunova said. “Impediments to delivering medications, such as arbitrary delays at checkpoints, can have a severe negative impact on their health with dire, and in some cases deadly, consequences.”

Restrictions and Their Impact

In November 2014 the Ukrainian government halted the provision of government services to rebel-controlled areas. Funds from the government budget for hospitals, including staff salaries, are no longer disbursed in rebel-controlled areas. On February 9, 2015, the Kiev District Court of Appeal partially annulled the decision, but it is not clear what steps the government has taken either to comply with the decision or to appeal.

Travel regulations introduced by the Ukrainian government in January require a special pass, issued by a coordination group of the Security Service of Ukraine, to move between rebel and government-controlled territories. Civilians living in rebel-controlled areas need to apply for the pass at a government checkpoint in a bureaucratic process requiring a minimum of two visits. Many complained of long lines to hand in their documents. The regulations set out a maximum 10-day waiting period for a pass, but several people who live in or near Donetsk said they had been waiting for up to three weeks and some still had not received a pass.

Independent humanitarian groups operating in the area, including Doctors Without Borders (MSF) and others, have said that they have been able to operate in rebel-held areas and successfully obtained these passes. But some spoke of difficulties they faced in delivering humanitarian aid and medical supplies.

Volunteer groups in rebel-controlled areas that provide targeted assistance to the most vulnerable groups reported difficulties connected with delays or refusals to let humanitarian aid through at checkpoints. One of the organizers of the local group Responsible Citizens, Dmytro Shibalov, told Human Rights Watch of instances where both Ukrainian forces at government checkpoints and rebel forces at rebel checkpoints refused to let their cargo pass without a reasonable explanation.

Treatment for Tuberculosis and HIV
People receiving treatment for tuberculosis (TB) or HIV and those on opioid substitution therapy (OST) are among the most vulnerable in the rebel-held areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The travel restrictions and the protracted fighting have severely impacted their treatment and put some of them at great risk. Treatment of HIV, TB, and viral hepatitis in eastern Ukraine is under great strain, with hospitals lacking both medicine and diagnostic equipment.

According to data provided to Human Rights Watch by the International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Ukraine, over 16,000 people are living with HIV/AIDS in rebel-held areas in eastern Ukraine, including over 7,000 people who receive antiretroviral therapy. At least 2,300 people there have active forms of TB, including about 500 people with multi-drug-resistant TB.

Doctors who work with people receiving treatment for HIV and TB in rebel-controlled areas told Human Rights Watch in February that their staff had faced long delays in getting permission to move new supplies of these medications from government-controlled to rebel-controlled territories.

The government has yet to approve a regulation drafted in January that would allow humanitarian groups to deliver methadone and buprenorphine, used in OST, to rebel-controlled areas. Medical centers in Donetsk and Luhansk regions may have to shut down these treatments when the supply runs out, which could have a devastating impact on patients receiving this therapy who would be at significant risk of relapsing into illicit drug use and of accidental overdoses.

The Donetsk Regional Center for AIDS Prevention and Control is registered in Sloviansk, on Ukrainian government-controlled territory, and continues to operate its facility in Donetsk, in rebel-controlled territory. In early February, the center’s chief medical officer, Nikolai Grazhdanov, told Human Rights Watch that the travel pass system has significantly delayed the delivery of both diagnostic test kits and antiretroviral medicine to the region, including Donetsk and nearby towns such as Horlivka and Makeevka.

The center’s deputy director, Valentina Pavlenko, MD, said in early February that her staff had been waiting three weeks for the travel passes to bring antiretroviral medicine and diagnostic kits from Sloviansk to rebel-held Donetsk. Although they eventually received the passes in early March, over 6,000 HIV-positive patents in the rebel-controlled territory of Donetsk were at risk of running out of medicine, Pavlenko said. A humanitarian aid convoy was eventually able to deliver treatment that is expected to last until April. Stopping the treatment may result in patients’ conditions deteriorating, with dire, and possibly deadly, consequences.

[... EDIT ... ]

Opioid Substitution Therapy

Opioid substitution therapy (OST) is available in government-controlled territory but the government has not yet approved a regulation, drafted in January, to allow independent humanitarian groups to deliver the methadone and buprenorphine used in this therapy to rebel-controlled areas. In the meantime, the stock of buprenorphine in rebel-controlled parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions has been depleted completely and methadone supplies are running out.

Igor Tsiba, the chief doctor of the regional drug treatment center in Donetsk treating patients in rebel-controlled areas, said in early February that while the center has been sporadically receiving necessary supplies and medicine with humanitarian convoys, delivery of OST therapy stopped in September 2014. The center had to discontinue treatment with buprenorphine in early January 2015 when the supplies ran out, and was in the process of drastically reducing methadone treatment.

Tsiba said that some of the most vulnerable patients who receive opioid substitution treatment, including those who are living with HIV, also have TB or various forms of hepatitis. Discontinuing their opioid substitution treatment will result in significant deterioration of their condition and could possibly have fatal consequences for some of them.

Yulia Drozd, MD, the head of the department for OST at the center, and head of Donbass Without Drugs, a nongovernmental group that provides medical treatment and social rehabilitation for patients in the Donetsk region, said in early February: “The most shocking thing is that these drugs are readily available but there is no way of getting them here because there is no procedure in place for delivering them.” Seventy percent of the patients who receive this therapy are also HIV-positive, and 25 percent have TB and are vulnerable to other infections, Drozd said.

According to data provided to Human Rights Watch by the International HIV/AIDS Alliance in Ukraine, as of early March, at least 600 patients in rebel-held areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions had to discontinue their opioid substitution treatment due to shortages of medicines.

Human Rights Watch interviewed three patients receiving OST. Elena, who had used heroin for over 30 years, said she turned her life around after she started OST a year ago and is terrified to think that she could lose it. Rita, 35, who has been receiving methadone therapy for six years and is living with HIV, said she could not leave Donetsk because she had no money and no relatives anywhere else. She looks after her 7-year-old son and her elderly mother, who recently had a stroke and cannot travel. “If I can’t receive treatment, I will not survive,” she said.

http://www.hrw.org/news/2015/03/13/ukraine-civilians-struggle-get-medical-care

COMMENT

Well, this sketches out what the official obligations are.  But, obviously, they can be by-passed or stalled to inflict hardship on the other side.  In this case, by the govt of Ukraine against the civilians in independence-militia-held regions in east Ukraine.

Shocked by the large number of people that have HIV (16,000 in east Ukraine independence militia held areas alone).  Seems like a huge number to me.




August 23, 2014

UKRAINE - Russian Humanitarian Aid - Ukraine Squealing. NATO Rhetoric Issued.




22 Aug. 2014

NATO Secretary General condemns entry of Russian convoy into Ukraine

I condemn the entry of a Russian so-called humanitarian convoy into Ukrainian territory without the consent of the Ukrainian authorities and without any involvement of the International Committee of the Red Cross. This is a blatant breach of Russia’s international commitments, including those made recently in Berlin and Geneva, and a further violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty by Russia. It can only deepen the crisis in the region, which Russia itself has created and has continued to fuel. The disregard of international humanitarian principles raises further questions about whether the true purpose of the aid convoy is to support civilians or to resupply armed separatists.

These developments are even more worrying as they coincide with a major escalation in Russian military involvement in Eastern Ukraine since mid-August, including the use of Russian forces. In addition, Russian artillery support – both cross-border and from within Ukraine – is being employed against the Ukrainian armed forces. We have also seen transfers of large quantities of advanced weapons, including tanks, armoured personnel carriers, and artillery to separatist groups in Eastern Ukraine. Moreover, NATO is observing an alarming build-up of Russian ground and air forces in the vicinity of Ukraine.

Instead of de-escalating the situation, Russia continues to escalate it, despite the efforts of the international community to find a political solution to the crisis. This can only lead to Russia’s further isolation. I strongly urge Russia not to take further provocative actions, to stop destabilising Ukraine and to take genuine steps to resolve this dangerous situation with full respect of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and international law.




Shelled civilians Eastern Ukraine.
No food.
No water.
Desperately in need of aid.
Been blocked for 12 days by Ukraine's bull.
Red Cross checked everything is FINE.
Ready to go.
Escort provided by independence supporters to Russian aid vehicles.

Poroshenko squealing like a stuck pig that it's an 'invasion'.
Hello, he was on-board with the aid?  So what's his problem?

NATO issuing the same RHETORIC which is BULL.
Sounds like NATO want war, the way they keep issuing the same bulldust.