Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Pew Poll Britain least Islamophobic of all European nations that were studied & Britain nevertheless where Muslims hated their host country the most.
Real religion has become individualism.
Nonetheless, a great desire for spirituality.
Spirituality without the church, without organised religion & moral codes.
Morality has been privatised.
What's right for me, is the basis for moral and cultural relativism.
Relativism involves no judgement to be permitted of people's lifestyles; the development of multiculturalism and victim culture, based on the doctrine that the values of the majority by definition are illegitimate, because they exclude the minorities.
Under the doctrine of relativism, there is no objective truth; everything is a matter of opinion, because my values are the equal of your values and therefore it is merely my opinion versus your opinion.
Under the doctrine of relativism, there is no objectivity; there is no truth.
This has given rise to a moral and social anarchy, in which Britain is rapidly retreating to a pre-modern age of irrationality.
Having disaggregated [divided] truth, we are no longer able to use the reason that bases itself on truth.
Yet we make a fetish of reason. It is in the name of reason -- scientific reason, also known as empiricism -- we have exiled religion and declared that god is dead because the biblical stories are merely primitive superstition, as they don't correspond to the dictates of reason as defined by empiricism.
Believe in a wide range of crap.
Complete disintegration of rationality, belief, cultural identity, morality, spirituality and religion has created a cultural vacuum.
Britain, Islamists filling the vacuum by:
1)
terrorising population through terror;
2)
converting the most vulnerable: criminals, mentally disturbed, young who look for meaning beyond materialism.
3)
exploiting victim culture, which has arisen out of doctrine of multiculturalism to claim that in the interests of 'equality' they must have preferential treatment in the public square, backed up by the threat of terrorism. Intellectual elite in Britain has fallen for this hook, line & sinker, unlike the public, who most certainly have not.
But our intellectual, political and security establishment in large measure is saying, instead of Muslims in Britain being treated on the principles of equality like any other minority, they have allowed and, indeed, condoned and encouraged, the steady encroachment of Islam into the public sphere.
So Britain now has earnest discussions by UK's most senior lawyers of the extent to which Islamic law can and should be permitted to encroach into the field of the English common law, although the principles of Islamic law are inimical to the English law and to the canons of Western society and British society.
Archbishop of Canterbury stated: entirely proper for British Muslims to have recourse to sharia family law alongside English common law.
He was somewhat surprised by the explosive reaction he provoked.
What he was saying we should have no fear of as a hypothetical enticement for the future was already happening, in spades.
In Britain, there's a steady development of Muslim enclaves which are governed informally by parallel jurisdiction of sharia law, a kind of embryonic state within a state.
Britain already turns an official blind eye to such things as cousin marriage, genital mutilation of women, honour violence, and polygamy.
Indeed, Britain is now, as a state, encouraging and condoning polygamy, because Britain is now giving welfare benefits to the multiple wives of Muslim men.
Britain's Prime Minister has said that Britain should become the global centre of sharia finance.
What is not understood, is that this will institutionalise Islamism in Britain.
It has come as a shock for some of Britain’s banks to find that on their sharia boards advising them about their sharia finance arrangements, sit those who are not wholly unassociated with Islamic terrorism and with al-Qaeda.
Sharia, as understood by Melanie Phillips, does not prohibit the charging of interest. Sharia merely prohibits exorbitant rates of interest.
Sharia loans will entail the Islamisation of borrowers, Phillips states.
British establishment refuses to see all of this and refuses to accept that religion is at the heart of the problem, and refuses to accept that what Britain is facing is an Islamic jihad.
British establishment has instead accepted the Muslims' own assertion that what we are facing in terms of terror is nothing whatsoever to do with religion and if anyone says that Islam is a religion of violence, they will kill them.
British establishment thinks that by seeking to accommodate this Muslim narrative of encroachment into the public sphere, they will draw the Muslim sting and get the Muslim community on-side, they will draw the sting of anger against Britain, they will turn jihadists into model citizens, and they will separate the community from al-Qaeda.
British establishment think that the Islamic religion in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood is an antidote to al-Qaeda -- an antidote to terror. They think the Muslim Brotherhood is a counter-radicalisation movement.
As a result, they are using the Muslim Brotherhood and bringing it into the heart of British establishment, because they fail to understand that what Britain is facing is a pincer movement of Islamism being used against British society, not just through terrorism but also through cultural attack.
Britain is seeing Leninist Islamism in the form of al-Qaeda, as well as Gramscian Islamism in the form of Tariq Ramadan and cultural Muslim Brotherhood onslaught, which corresponds to and is using the Gramscian onslaught on the basic tenets of Western civilisation through such things as the capture of the intelligentsia, the capture of the universities, the capture of the establishment, the capture of the civil service, the destruction of such things as family and nation, and substitution of the values of the excluded and transgressive for the values of the normal.
That is the Gramscian project. It has succeeded in Britain absolutely to the letter. And the Islamists are coming along and Islamising Gramsci. That's what Britain has.
The government does not see this, so Britain now has Muslim Brotherhood people at the centre of government, advising government on how to combat Islamist extremism.
Melanie Phillips has sat in defence establishment seminars, where she has seen hard-bitten people from the security establishment sitting lapping up Islamits bamboozling them with a sanitised and highly selective version of Islam.
Melanie Phillips states that she knows that the British police are giving sensitive security information to Muslim extremists who are on their liaison groups with the community, which are not vetted in case they upset the Muslim community and they are asking permission of these people before they conduct raids.
What this is doing is undermining the true moderate Muslims in Britain, of whom there are certainly some, but not by any means as many as is said to be, but they do exist.
Cardinal Pell painted a benign and optimistic picture of relations between the non-Muslim and Muslim minority in Australia.
Melanie Phillips makes a couple of points, which Pell did not fully acknowledge:
1. Australia has very few Muslims compared to Britain and what there is in Europe, and that of course makes a considerable difference.
2. Key thing about Australia is that this relatively happy state of affairs follows the incredibly hard line taken by John Howard and other ministers in that government, who basically said in terms, repeatedly: this is the line we are drawing, we are a European Western society, you live here on our terms, or else you go -- and by the way, we are not letting a lot of you in and like it or lump it, these are our terms. This is our society, this is our culture, you are welcome to take part in it, but on our terms.
Melanie Phillips states, this is what has to happen. Britain has to draw the cultural line in the sand.
"The British Muslims say to us, we want equality. We are a minority, we want equality. And the establishment, because its so bamboozled by multiculturalism, thinks that equality means equality of the minorities with the majority. But it doesn't.
The deal since the establishment has been that the majority upholds its own society -- and in the case of Britain and the West, tenets of liberalism, of tolerance of the disconnect between religion and the public square -- and that all minorities are treated the same *as each other* within that.
In other words, they are all free and welcome to practise communities of faith, but where those faiths may conflict with the dominant values of the majority, those values must give way. ... In terms of the public sphere, it's ours: you do not colonise it. So not one inch will we give to sharia, because we give it to no other minority."
Britain has gone hell for leather in the opposite direction and that is why Britain is the most tolerant nation in Europe towards its Muslim minority, and it is the most hated by that minority.
Hard to weigh up how seriously to take Melanie Phillips, as she is very bound up in defending Israel -- ie Israel can do no wrong -- & it sounds like the US can't do wrong either (eg 2007 videos I just looked at).
That could be unimportant, but it could also be a significant thing.
The threat is probably real (but not necessarily for the reasons she thinks). The rest I don't buy.
Israel never gets bad press, but from the way this lady's talking in the videos I've seen, you'd think the press was crucifying Israel.
Israel is always treated as an exception: Tzipi Livni arrest warrant ignored; over 120,000 signature petition to arrest Netanyahu not discussed in UK parliament, contrary to own rules; the "Israel has a right to defend itself" constant refrain, as Israel was pounding Gaza (which is like an open prison); the massive amount of aid Israel receives from the US; the military aid Israel received from Germany; the considerable amount of kowtowing to Israel and supporters of Israel that the West seems to do, are just some of the things that come to mind.
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 