Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Highly improbable that this was a random 'intruder'.
More like an MI6 or CIA visit.
They're trying to kill Assange now.
Security should have shot whoever that was creeping up on Ecuador sovereign territory.
VIDEO
IGNORANT PIG CHORUS
SQUEALS FOR AUSSIE JOURNALIST ASSANGE ASSASSINATION
[RIGHT-CLICK IMAGE, 'NEW TAB']
AUSTRALIA
WHY aren't Australiansfurious that one of their own is illegally and undemocratically imprisoned by the British war criminals, on behalf of the American war criminals, on trumped up Swedish police 'rape' allegations, on which they base Sweden's FAKE 'PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS' & 6 YEARS OF UNLAWFUL ASSANGE IMPRISONMENT DOWN THE TRACK - without even INTERVIEWING their US JUSTICE DEPARTMENT & US STATE DEPT. WANTEDPOLITICALLY PERSECUTED AUSSIE JOURNALIST QUARRY, as the CORRUPT AMERICAN CAPITALIST EMPIRE STATE seeks to redefine international journalism and truth-telling as 'crime', so that they may continue to commit war crimes and other malfeasance under cover of secrecy, and with impunity.
SWEDEN POLICE are top-down pressured into remaining silent about brutal rapes, gang rapes and mass rapes of Swedish women and girls by foreign infiltrators that have been violently assaulting native Swedish women for decades of GENOCIDAL Swedish government POLICY, and SILENCE of police and Swedish press, operating under a BLANKET of SWEDISH MEDIA COLLUSION, LIES & PROPAGANDA.
THAT same corrupt Swedish state that implements a program of rape of Sweden as a Swedish nation state, and likewise implements a program rape of Swedish womanhood by foreigner, while paying lip service to Sweden's 'feminist foreign policy' that is UTTER PERVERSION & FAKE PR CONCOCTION THAT IS CONCEALING A SHOCKING & UGLY REALITY.
CONSIDERING the Swedish state, police and media CORRUPTION AND COLLUSION to cover up RAPES OF SWEDISH WOMEN AND GIRLS by foreigners, just think what this corrupt state is capable of committing to accommodate the wishes and agenda of world trade and military hegemon, the US CAPITALIST EMPIRE that has issued a SECRET WARRANT for the arrest of AUSSIE JOURNALIST JULIAN ASSANGE (confirmed shortly after he was taken prisoner in Britain).
ASSANGE IS WANTED by the criminal US CAPITALIST EMPIRE, and the corrupt Swedish state that facilitates rape of Swedes is blocking this Australian whistleblower publisher's LAWFULLY GRANTED POLITICAL ASYLUM AND ROBBING HIM OF LIBERTY on preposterous Swedish state 'sexual misconduct' allegations.
THAT corrupt Swedish state is exploiting flimsy Swedish police allegations to unlawfully imprison Australian Journalist, Julian Assange without charge.
SWEDEN POLICE allegations are so flimsy the corrupt Swedish state has strategically chosen (on advice of, and collusion with, Britain's Crown Prosecution Service) to DENY ASSANGE opportunity to DEFEND himself, by thus far DENYING Assange an interview in UK where he is detained, although the corrupt rape-facilitating state that is Sweden has precedent of having conducted 44 such interviews on British soil in the past.
It is under these circumstances that the corrupt state that is Sweden has continued to deprive Julian Assange of liberty, as it has maintained de facto imprisonmentof Assange, who has been terrorised by the UNDEMOCRATIC, WAR-CRIMINAL BRITISH STATE committing an intimidating and costly 4-year Embassy siege at Embassy of Ecuador, London.
CRIMINAL, RAPE-FACILITATING SWEDEN, has also denied Julian Assange needed medical treatment.
A UNITED NATIONS panel recently ruled that Assange was arbitrarily and lawfully detained, but both Sweden and Britain have refused to accept the United Nations panel ruling and Britain has spent MILLIONS OF POUNDS on this illegal imprisonment that is CLEARLY POLITICAL PERSECUTION of Australian, Julian Assange.
"The judges in the verdict said that that the United States, under the leadership of Bush, forged documentsto claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction."
"“Bush and Blair are found guilty under the same law that applied to the Nazis after the end of the World War II. So, they are international (war) criminals guilty of Nuremberg crimes against peace; and they should be prosecuted by any state in the world that gets a hold of them."
US Capitalist Empire has taken steps IN ADVANCE to ensure that no country dare prosecute the AMERICAN-ANGLO CAPITALIST WAR CRIMINALS (or their associates), as US Capitalist Empire has given itself permission to wage war against those that seek to bring US CAPITALIST WAR CRIMINALS to justice.
"A new law supposedly protecting U.S. servicemembers from the International Criminal Court shows that the Bush administration will stop at nothing in its campaign against the court.
U.S. President George Bush today signed into law the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, which is intended to intimidate countries that ratify the treaty for the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the "Hague invasion clause," has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.
In addition, the law provides for the withdrawal of U.S. military assistance from countries ratifying the ICC treaty, and restricts U.S. participation in United Nations peacekeeping unless the United States obtains immunity from prosecution. At the same time, these provisions can be waived by the president on "national interest" grounds.
...
The law is part of a multi-pronged U.S. effort against the International Criminal Court. On May 6, in an unprecedented move, the Bush administration announced it was "renouncing" U.S. signature on the treaty. "
A former Australian army chief has warned Canberraagainst “blindly” following the United States in the American military adventures, a day after a long-awaited inquiry into Britain’s role in the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq blamed the UK for rushing to war.
“We... need to be careful of blindly going along with our senior strategic partners,” Peter Leahy, who was the chief of the Australian army from 2002 to 2008,said in an apparent reference to the US.
“I think as we look at other issues that are afoot at the moment, there are some thoughts to be given there — what decisions are we making?” he said, speaking on Thursday.
The former army chief, who is now a professor at Canberra University’s National Security Institute, added that “Frankly, some of the decisions the United States, our senior partner in our strategic alliance, have [sic] made over the last 20 or 30 years have been a bit crook.”
The Chilcot Inquiry, established in 2009 to investigateBritain’s most controversial military engagement since the end of the Second World War, published its 6,000-page report in 12 volumes on Wednesday, slamming former British Prime Minister Tony Blair over support for former US President George W. Bush in the 2003 Iraq war.
At the time, Blair presented the case for war with “a certainty which was not justified”based on “flawed” intelligence about Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which was not challenged as it should have been, the report concluded.
Blair’s government sent 120,000 members of the British armed forces and civilians to Iraq, proving its role as Bush’s chief military ally. A total of 179 British personnel werekilled in the war.
In 2003, Australia also sent 2,000 troops to support the US and British forces in the invasion of Iraq, whose legal basis, according to the Chilcot Inquiry, was “far from satisfactory.”
According to Leahy, a review of the Australian involvement in the Iraq war released in 2004 also showed that Canberra relied on flawed advice in joining its senior allies.
“Let’s have a discussion, not an inquiry, around our relationship with the United States, how we decide to go to war and very importantly how we decide every day when we are at war to stay at war,” Leahy said.
Meanwhile, Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, who at the time of the Iraq invasion was part of then-Prime Minister John Howard’s conservative government, defended the decision made by the government to send troops to Iraq, saying it was “based on… the best information that we had at the time.”
“The government takes responsibility for all decisions that a government makes and we take responsibility for this one,” she further said, describing the decision as “a bipartisan position up to a point.”
Blair himself has defended the British decision to follow in the US’s footsteps into Iraq following the publication of the Chilcot report.
"AN OBSTACLE TO EVERY SINGLE WESTERN OBJECTIVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST"
"OUR GOAL IS REGIME CHANGE"
"WE HAVE HAD SUCH GOALS BEFORE. WE SUCCEEDED IN THE SOVIET UNION, IN APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA AND IN BELGRADE."
"I ASSUME [REGIME CHANGE] REMAINS OUR GOAL IN PLACES LIKE BURMA, IRAN, LIBYA, ZIMBABWE AND LIBERIA."
"LAWYERS AND PEACENIKS SHOULD NOT PREVENT US FROM SAYING WHAT WE REALLY WANT IN IRAQ"
"IF WE WERE TO BUILD UP THE KURDS AND THE SHIA AS PROXIES, WHAT ASSURANCES WOULD WE HAVE TO GIVE THEM THAT WE WOULD NOT LET THEM DOWN YET AGAIN?"
"ALL OF THESE ARE MUCH MORE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS THAN LEGALITY ..."
"WE CAN LOOK FOR A LEGAL BASIS ONCE WE HAVE DECIDED WHAT TO DO, AS WE DID IN KOSOVO."
"WE KNOW BUSH, AT THE END OF THE DAY, WILL BE BOTH INTELLIGENT AND RESPONSIBLE IF WE CAN HELP THE AMERICANS COME UP WITH A PERSUASIVE PLAN TO OUST THE WORLDS WORST TYRANT, THEN WE SHOULD DO SO. AND IF THE BEST MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE ORGANS OF LONDON AND WASHINGTON FAIL TO PRODUCE A CONVINCING PLAN, THEN WE STICK TO CONTAINMENT."
John Sawers descendant of Norman invaders (12th C.)
former British Diplomat
former British Senior Civil Servant
Foreign & Commonwealth Office 1997 MI6 agent in Yemen & Syria
Political Officer, Damascus 1982
FCO Desk Officer, European Union Dept. 1984
Private Sec. to Minister of State 1986
FCO, Pretoria, Cape Town, South Africa 1988-1991
Head of European Union Presidency Planning Unit 1991
Principal Private Secretary to Douglas Hurd 1993:
- Bosnia War
- Middle East war
- European Union debate
International Fellow at Harvard University, USA, 1995-1998
British Embassy, Washington DC, headed Foreign & Defence Policy Team Foreign Affairs Adviser to PM Tony Blair 1999-2001
- Kosovo War
- Northern Ireland peace process
- Iraq sanctions policy Ambassador toEgypt 2001 - 2003 British Special Representatives to Baghdad (3 mths)
FCO, Director Gen. for Political Affairs 2003
wide scope, negotiations with: G8, EU and the UN
closely involved re policy on:
Iran
Iraq
Afghanistan
Balkans
British Permanent Representative to the United Nations 2007-2009
former Chief of MI6, Secret Intelligence Service 2009-2014
governor of the Ditchley Foundation, Anglo-US capitalist relations promo Ditchley Foundation est. 1958 by Sir David Wills, descendant of the tobacco importing family, W. D. & H. O. Wills (Bristol)
W.D. & H.O. Wills, est. 1786
one of founding companies of: Imperial Tobacco
on merger of W.D. & H.O. Wills & x7 other tobacco companies
key: William Wills, 1st Baron Winterstoke
businessman, Liberal politician
Julie Bishop defending the decision to enter into ILLEGAL WAR ON IRAQ, on a CONCOCTED basis, for the enrichment of US-ANGLO CAPITALISTS who destroyed and robbed the country, is appalling. But what else can the government do? It's not like they're going to admit to being war criminals and admit liability, are they? LOL It also sounds like Australia might want to address the issue of the constitution that permits a declaration of war without parliamentary backing.
Noticed that there's a message on the YouTube video site, indicating that the video is UNLISTED.
Why are BBC censoring this video?
Just checked that YouTube location again. It looks like it's been loaded by an account other than the BBC, and the message is that it's unlisted etc. So is this YouTube censorship of some kind?
PICTURE OF NOTICE
[CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE]
VIDEO
Guillaume Long Foreign Minister, Ecuador BBC Interview 21 June 2016
I can barely get through this. I've had to take a pause, because it's getting on my nerves something shocking.
Not enjoying this BBC interview at all. When I tune into a program that is interviewing a subject, my attention is on the subject — or that's where I want it to be. But it's not in this instance.
The attention is on the grating BBC presenter's style of interviewing that is injecting quasi-hysterical emotionalism of the presenter into the interview.
It immediately had me on edge and pissed off watching this unprofessionalism. Not because of what I consider unprofessionalism per se, but because it is distracting and annoying.
Please, BBC, find or train calm, professional presenters, who do not inject themselves or their emotions into the subjects of interview.
Not only is this appalling interview style distracting and detracting from what is being discussed, the constant interruptions of the presenter speaking over the top of the subject make for a chaotic farce that's a chore following.
While on the subject of farce, the "rape is a serious accusation" insistent assertions of the presenter — when we ALL KNOW the facts after almost 6 years of undemocratic British political persecution and arbitrary detention of this Australian journalist — is beyond ridiculous.
Who writes this crap, the British Foreign Office, the Ministry of Justice or the British Ministry of Truth ... or the US State Department?
It's like accusing Iceland of having committed the Armenian genocide, and shrilly demanding of Iceland: "Isn't genocide a serious accusation?"
Clearly, the nature of the accusation is irrelevant when the accusation is false.
The arbitrary detention, smear, silencing, political persecution, calls for assassination, targeting and potential USA lifelong imprisonment or execution of an Australian journalist, in a British 'democracy', is the serious matter the pseudo left-leaning British propaganda organ, the 'Beeb', isn't so keen on addressing.
In addition to the facts of the matter, British intelligence, GCHQ, and the British Crown Prosecution Service has already told us all we need to know about this 'sex crime' farce.
Swedish extradition request for Assange ‘a fit-up’ - UK intel chatter
Published time: 20 May, 2013 14:19
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assangecited unclassified messages exchanged inside a UK intelligence agency to back his refusal to be extradited to Sweden. One of the messages calls sex-related allegations against Assange “a fit-up”.
The Australian, who has been stranded at Ecuadorian embassy in London for almost 12 months, cited instant messages he received fromGovernment Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the British signal intelligence body.
One message from September 2012, which Assange read out in a Sunday night interview with Spanish TV program Salvados, says: "They are trying to arrest him on suspicion of XYZ … It is definitely a fit-up… Their timings are too convenient right after Cablegate."
Another conversation he cited goes: "He reckons he will stay in the Ecuadorian embassy for six to 12 months when the charges against him will be dropped, but that is not really how it works now is it? He's a fool… Yeah… A highly optimistic fool."
Assange did not explain who the people exchanging the messages were, but said he managed to obtain them because they were not classified.
"[GCHQ] won't hand over any of the classified information," he said. "But, much to its surprise, it has some unclassified information on us."
GCHQ confirmed to RT that it released the info to Assange under the Data Protection Act. It can be used by individuals to obtain personal information that UK bodies have about them. The agency is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, the usual mechanism for getting information of interest released by officials.
[...]
A British court ordered that Assange be extradited to Sweden, where authorities want to question him on sex-related allegations. He refuses to go to there unless it guarantees that it won’t extradite him to the US, where he faces espionage charges over data released by WikiLeaks.
[...]
The cost of the surveillance, which is believed to involve two police vehicles and eight officers on duty at all times, is now over $16,500 a day, Scotland Yard recently reported. The operation cost British taxpayers over $5 million since Assange got his refuge on June 19, 2012. By the time the anniversary falls, the sum is expected to have gone over $6.3 million.
[comment: current cost of arbitrary detention of journalist Julian Assange: in excess of £14-million - here]
Global - Wikileaks Statement on the 9 Month Anniversary of Cablegate: Release of 133,887 Cables
29th August 2011
Over the past week, WikiLeaks has released 133,887 US diplomatic cables from around the world - more than half of the entire Cablegate material (251,287 cables). The new release was met with a sustained Denial of Service (DOS) attack during the first 36 hours. WikiLeaks had to rely on back-up servers for some hours. With supporters’ help, WikiLeaks was able to bring in additional servers to stave off the attack.
For the first time, the diplomatic cables are available from every country that has US diplomatic representation. Until now, many countries had been excluded from the news stories, partly due to WikiLeaks media partners’ geographical bias, and partly due to Wikileaks’ resource constraints in establishing new media partnerships (there are now over 90).
Background
Nine months ago today, WikiLeaks launched Cablegate together with four media partners (Der Spiegel, El Pais, Le Monde, the Guardian) and the New York Times (who obtained the cables from the Guardian). The US administration and allied media groups responded with threats and intimidation. WikiLeaks and an alleged source, US intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, bore the brunt of these attacks. During the first weeks, calls to kidnap and assassinate WikiLeaks staff, and particularly its founder and editor-in-chief Julian Assange, were frequent. Shortly thereafter, VISA, MasterCard, PayPal, Bank of America and Western Union unilaterally prevented WikiLeaks from receiving donations from its supporters. The unlawful financial blockade of our publication continues, although WikiLeaks is suing VISA Europe and MasterCard, and has filed a complaint with the European Commission for serious breach. (For ways to donate, see http://wikileaks.org/support ). A secret grand jury in Virginia is deciding whether Julian Assange, a journalist and Australian national, can be charged with espionage for the publication of this material.
[comment: sealed U.S. Grand Jury indictment has been confirmed - Jan. 2011 - see image below ]
Rationale: release of 133,887 cables
Cablegate launched nine months ago today. Despite the amount of material yet to be reported on, mainstream media organisations in Europe and the United States have slowed their rate of publishing Cablegate derived stories. This has led to the misperception in Europe and the US that WikiLeaks has been less active in recent months. In fact, WikiLeaks has stepped up its activity, establishing new partnerships on each continent with local media organisations that can contextualise the cables and carry out in-depth analysis. WikiLeaks has gone from its four original partners in November 2010 to over ninety as of this month (August 2011).
[ ... ]
New stories include nuclear safety in China, a letter from the UN rapporteur to the US mission in Geneva inquiring on the reason why a US army soldier was not prosecuted for the killing of a Reuters journalist, a cable suggesting that the peaceful resolution of the conflict with North Korea may pose a risk to US interests in China because it may lead to China asking the US to leave its army base (some of the #wlfind stories are listed below).
Reading the above remark about the army base, I thought the US had an army base in China ... and then I thought Russia's doomed.
But I couldn't find a US base in China, so I must be reading that wrong. LOL
It doesn't look too good for Assange, though.
An Australian journalist has been set up and undemocratically imprisoned in the UK for exposing US capitalist empire (and allied capitalist) crimes and wrongdoings, and he has been held arbitrarily for over 5 years in the UK, while the US capitalists have extended their jurisdiction worldwide, to criminalise journalism.
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
