Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
QUICKIE TRANSCRIPT [evolved from initial summary]
The Truth About RT Host Liz Wahl's Resignation.
Paul Joseph Watson
reporting for: InfoWars.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIiiwe6TUtY [CONFIRM AUDIO FOR QUOTATION PURPOSES]
Paul Joseph Watson:
Ex-RT host Liz Wahl is not "brave" or "courageous."
Her resignation reeks of hypocrisy.
IMMEDIATELY interviewed by none other than:
Jamie Kirchick ...
According to Paul Joseph Watson, "paid for years and years to be state propagandist" and Kirchick "worked for years as a government funded state propagandist."
KIRCHICK -- U.S. CONGRESS FUNDING, DURING ENGAGEMENT AS RFE/RL EMPLOYEE
As a recent writer for Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Kirchick and his employee were funded entirely by the United States Congress.
This was a network funded by the CIA and the entity that now overseas it is also behind Voice of America, Radio Free Asia and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting,and its mission is telling the American story worldwide.
So this is who Liz Wahl is buddied up with and he gets the exclusive, decrying the fact that she's a state propagandist, yet he worked for the ultimate in state propaganda Radio Free Europe, writing state propaganda for the purposes of the state military-industrial complex, such as this article about how Libya's war-torn capital after it was overrun by US backed rebels was "calm."
Of course, we know the truth that now Libya is now a hell-hole run by armed militants and brutal gangs that put black people in concentration camps.
So the first thing that this 'brave', 'courageous' reporter who decried being a conduit for state propaganda does is teams up with one of the biggest state propagandists in journalist -- James Kirchick -- and then becomes the darling of the mainstream media, whom she will probably have a job with within weeks.
Lawrence O'Donnell
MSNBC
The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell:
Of course, within hours, she's on CNN with Anderson Cooper, the former CIA employee who never came across a piece of state propaganda that the did not want to eagerly regurgitate.
And, of course, all this occurred in the context of the media aftermath of RT's Abbey Martin making headlines for her criticism of Russia's quote "invasion of Crimea" and, of course, during her resignation monologue, Liz Wahl said that she had a partner who worked at a US military base.
So here's a newsflash for Abbey Martin & Liz Wahl, who obviously haven't done any actual research: under a 1997 treaty between the Ukraine and Russia, Russia is allowed to station 25,000 troops in Crimea.
At the moment, even with all the escalation, they only have 16,000, so they can put in another 9,000 and it still wouldn't be an invasion because it's legal under that 1997 treaty.
And, of course, many Crimean cities are voting to join Russia, while a general referendum for Crimea joining Russia will take place over the next couple of weeks.
Unlike in Ukraine, where violent militants overthrew a democratically elected government, at least in Crimea, they get a vote -- and now they're voting to join Russia.
So Abbey Martin, and in the same context Liz Wahl, are unhappy about this quote "invasion of Crimea", but is it really an 'invasion' when the treaty says they can station up to 25,000 troops there. Not a shot was fired. I wouldn't really call this an 'invasion'.
I would say that this looks more like an invasion.
I would say that up to a million dead Iraqis looks like more of an invasion, bearing in mind that Liz Wahl's partner works for the very same US military that carried this out.
One of her other complaints was that Liz Wahl's final interview with Ron Paul was unfairly edited, while Ron Paul himself yesterday and said he thought the interview was perfectly fine, it was well edited. No problem there.
And Liz Wahl's also unhappy about the fact that RT reported many of the protesters in Kiev are "neo-Nazis", as if that was some kind of Russian invented conspiracy theory.
Well, you don't have to go to Russia Today to find evidence of neo-Nazis in Ukraine.
Edit (insert):
Wolfsangel Initial symbol of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP)
colloquially known as: 'Nazi Party'
The BBC just put out a major report showing these individuals marching through Kiev in columns of thirty. They like to wear the SS arm bands, they're affiliated with people who create think tanks devoted to Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, and now the neo-Nazi linked Svoboda Party, who you see John McCain meeting with their leader, and, of course, Victoria Nuland, who was caught in a leaked phone conversation plotting the overthrow of the Ukrainian government.
"FUCK THE EU!"
VICTORIA NULAND
US STATE DEPT
Now that neo-fascist party has been given three key top positions within the post-coup Ukrainian government so, yeah, I just guess that neo-Nazi involvement in the uprising is just a 'Kremlin conspiracy theory'.
And then there's just the ludicrousness of her somehow working for RT for two years and not realising that it was Russian state media, like it was some kind of shock.
Like, a clue might have been those weekly pay cheques that came straight from the Kremlin, do you think?
And another clue that she might have been working for an organisation that wanted to transmit a pro-Russian message: maybe the clue was in the name, you know, RT -- Russia Today? Did she think of that over the course of the last two years?
And you've just got to love the response from the media:
Oh, my god!
Russia Today wants to transmit a pro-Russia message!
They're celebrating it with glee.
Yet I don't see a call for a wave of resignations, for example, from Euro News room reporters, even though that channel is funded directly by and promotes EU propaganda.
Similarly, we're very unlikely to witness BBC journalists, like Jeremy Paxman, resigning en masse to protest against Tony Blair's genocide in Iraq.
So in conclusion, Liz Wahl is not 'brave' or 'courageous' for taking two years to figure out the fact that Russia Today wants to put out a pro-Russian perspective.
And the fact that the mainstream media would treat that as such a shock controversy only serves to reveal their bias and their pro-state media agenda and, in the process, revealing Liz Wahl to be a cynical hack engaging in rampant hypocrisy, who is obviously angling for a job with the mainstream media and, boy, do they deserve each other."
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
No comments:
Post a Comment