Sweden - Genocidal Feminist Foreign Policy

GENOCIDAL FEMINIST FOREIGN POLICY S W E D E N Östersund, Sweden (middle of Sweden)  March 2016 VERY VIOLENT 3-OFFENDER GANG RAPE plus 3-OFFENDER ATTEMPTED GANG RAPE & other cases [offenders sober] Women Warned Not to Go Out At Night https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8wMWAgwr8k 6 Reported Cases Women are warned not to go out alone at night in Swedish town after multiple sex attacks by ‘foreigners’ 8 March 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3481882/Women-warned-not-night-Swedish-town-multiple-sex-attacks-foreigners.html COMMENT Europeans, this is what a genocidal government looks like.

Germany Surprises Propagandist Media

GERMANY Surprises Propagandist Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn6pXxmbrHk&feature=youtu.be "Published on 12 May 2016 During an Interview in Essen, a German woman surprised the reporter when she let out her anger after being asked if the Quran mattered more than the constitution.  In less than a minute she said what most sane German citizens are thinking, but are reluctant to say publicly in fear or persecution or being called a racist or Islamophobic.  She stated that the US is behind Merkel's immigration policy as nobody could be this stupid, that she gets sexually harassed daily by so-called refugees and equipped herself for self defense after being attacked by a foreigners. She also strongly expressed her discontent with contemporary politics, saying she "hated everything about politics right now", detests the refugees and "wants them all out", promising to vote the Nationalist "Alternative for Germany" in the next election. Germany is expected to receive another 1.2-1.5 million illegal immigrants this year, 70% of whom are young, military aged men according to the UN. Consequently, incidents of rape, murder, sexual harassment, civil discontent and support for nationalist parties skyrocketed." SOURCE (as above) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn6pXxmbrHk&feature=youtu.be

Germany - Hostage to Criminal Government & Criminal Press

Germany Hostage to Criminal Government & Criminal Press http://www.infowars.com/media-covering-up-muslim-migrant-background-of-munich-knife-attacker/ Media Covering Up Muslim Migrant Background of Munich Knife Attacker? Blogger says police sources told him knifeman's real name was Rafik Youssef Paul Joseph Watson - May 11, 2016 The German media is covering up the identity of the individual involved in yesterday’s knife attack in Munich to hide the fact that he is a Muslim migrant, according to a blogger who cites police sources. One person was killed and several injured during the incident, which took place in Grafing at a train station located to the south-east of the German city. Initial reports said that the attack was inspired by Islamist motives and that the knifeman shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the rampage. However, the story was soon corrected to state that the attacker had mental problems and was a German citizen named “Paul H.” from Giessen in the state of Hesse. This narrative is contradicted by blogger Von Marco Delgardo, who asserts that the ‘Paul H.’ explanation is a cover-up and that the attacker’s real name is Rafik Youssef. Delgardo writes that the attacker, “has a Muslim immigrant background and he is not demonstrably Paul H,” citing “very good contacts in police circles.” Delgardo also says that he was told by the State Criminal Investigation Department that “Paul H.” was a name that only appeared in media accounts and did not come from police sources. Police have not yet ruled out that attacker had an “immigrant background,” Delgardo was told. The notion that German police would seek to cover-up the nature of the attack in an effort to hide a connection to the large numbers of Muslim migrants currently entering the country is by no means far fetched. Last year we documented how German police were being ordered to cover-up details of rapes involving Muslim migrants so as not to “legitimize” critics of mass migration. It was also recently confirmed that police investigating the mass molestation of women in Cologne on New Year’s Eve “were ordered to remove the word “rape” from their initial report.” Accounts of the hundreds of sexual assaults, which were committed by predominantly Muslim migrants, were not reported on by the press for days despite circulating on social media. Germany’s top broadcaster ZDF is also refusing to run crime stories about Muslim rape suspects because, in the words of Editor in chief Ina-Maria Reize-Wildemann, “We don’t want to inflame the situation and spread the bad mood. [The migrants] don’t deserve it.” Authorities were also involved in another possible cover-up when explosives were reportedly found outside a soccer stadium in Hannover shortly after the Paris attacks. Authorities later claimed that no explosives were discovered, but a paramedic says he witnessed the bomb and was “told not to talk about it” after special forces arrived on the scene. Three police officers have also reportedly been disciplined for leaking information about the alleged discovery of the bombs. http://www.infowars.com/media-covering-up-muslim-migrant-background-of-munich-knife-attacker/ COMMENT So how long are hostage Europeans going to take this criminality and abuse from their governments and from the media, without taking any action?

Video: Criminal Destruction of Europe by Capitalists

Video:  CRIMINAL Destruction of Europe by Capitalists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE0atYJi8uM While I don't agree with everything the narrator has to say, I think he makes some good points. However, this invasion tsunami is just the tip of the iceberg:  Western politicians have had a destruction of European societies policy in place over DECADES. Watching those women being attacked by invaders makes me sick. F*ck the Western politicians that have done this to their countries, f*ck the Western intelligentsia and media, and f*ck the liberal-left useful idiots, who collectively imperil all European people.

EU-NATO Bastard Invasion of Europe Jihadist Recruitment Drive

EU-NATO Bastard Invasion of Europe Jihadist Recruitment Drive 44% European jihadists won't need a Turkish visa to get to Syria The filthy EU-NATO bastards have opened European borders to a horde of invaders from all of Africa, Middle East and Asia, so that they can select, train and equip jihadist mercenaries to attack Syria, via an open borders Europe/Turkey. In pursuit of their evil plan, EU-NATO have opened Europe to further onslaught of: rape of European women and children; Rotherham, UK - thousands of British children sacrificed. Cologne rapes - hundreds of German women sacrificed. Stockholm rapes - hundreds of Swedish women sacrificed. decades-long pattern of offending, ignored by European politicians. already facilitated by: European government, police & media cover-ups pattern. governments failing to keep appropriate (a) demographics statistics & (b) criminal offending statistics (pretext of  'non-discrimination' motives). as well as: enormous & enduring social and other costs; inevitable terrorist attacks on European soil; and displacement, dispossession, and destruction of Europe as the ancestral homeland of Europeans. The European Union and NATO scumbags make the Islamic Caliphate look like national heroes. EDIT Also a part of the general destruction of Europe program that has been implemented by the scum that control Europe, and a program of destruction that has been 'mid-wifed' by the capitalist scum that consider Europe a colony. Invasion, dismemberment, dispossession and dissolution of Europe as ancestral homeland of the Europeans is a LONG-STANDING PROGRAM that has been implemented by ALL SERVANTS OF CAPITALISM. The program of destruction of Europe continues irrespective of the program of the destruction of Syria, that the West and their Middle Eastern allies inflict with impunity on the Syrian people. Sending armed jihadist militias to Syria from Europe via the Turkish route is entirely in keeping with the Western years-long program of having already sent destructive proxy forces to Syria. It explains why the scum that control Europe are not concerned that armies of able-bodied military-age young men invade Europe.

Invasion of Castrato Europe

Invasion of Castrato Europe What Could Possibly Go Wrong?  Gad Saad Chats With:  Nicolai Sennels  Danish Psychologist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFIfEHeHqwc&feature=youtu.be Best quote: "Progressives pray at the altar of self-flagellation" [Below are my notes, as I've understood video] Interview opens with discussion of different mindsets / psychology / cultural responses, traits, values etc, in terms of observations of immigrant criminality in Denmark.   Talk of freedom of speech as foundation for Western progress / evolution.  However: newspapers censoring selves artists censoring selves professionals censoring selves Either desire not to offend or not to attract violence. Contrast in societies/peoples -- immigrant vs. host: Absence of freedom of speech leads to -->  absence of competition of ideas leads to -->  absence of progress / evolution inhibition of anger /  v. expression of anger honour & shame culture / v. security victim mentality / question of:  locus of control locus of control -- inner versus outer factor experience of 'control' -- westerners, generally raised with inner locus of control -- immigrants, understanding life is created by outer factors -- everything viewed from 'if deity wills it' position -- plus, governed by male figures with completely fixed set of rules, laws, systems of behaviour etc -- thus little experience of inner locus of control or of experimenting with inner locus of control -- certain immigrant groups, it is contended, have outer locus of control -- which lends itself to a victim mentality -- it is question of how one sees cause and effect -- result:  moral individual agency removed -- immigrants = intolerance to out-group members -- West generally not religious but still looking for what is a 'good person' -- for West 'open & tolerant' is the idea of a 'good' person -- new way of defining of what is a 'good' person -- however, West, too open & too tolerant -- furthermore, the same does not apply to immigrants hosted -- minimal integration -- host populations bend to foreign populations -- give & take inapplicable for the West -- guests ought to expect to abide 100%; -- unwise for West to cede an inch -- cultural & religious pressure of in-group very intense -- beatings, being sent back to homeland etc, consequences dire -- if 'Westernised' (eg handling anger differently etc, insult  to culture/religion by showing weakness) Professor Tina Magaard, linguist content analysis religious texts Murderous passages take up large space; 'us & them' logic, in which infidels & apostates characterised as dirty, rotten, criminal, hypocritical, and dangerous. It is also striking how much these texts demand that the reader fight the infidels, both with words and the sword. -- above conclusion drawn by academic after study of texts, that involved counting the occurrence of words Bill Warner -- has spent almost 15 years, doing analysis of religious texts (comparative) -- 'Sharia for the Non-Muslim' (book), highly recommended / authoritative Strong negative views in religious texts, influences the view of non co-religionists -- easier to harm others given mindset -- 'humanistic' view on non co-religionists destroyed by the religious indoctrination [comment:  'humanistic' view cannot be destroyed, if it never existed.  'Humanistic' view is not natural.  If it was not taught, it does not exist.  Personally, I would contend that the 'humanistic' view is completely unnatural and is dangerously maladaptive.] -- 'najis' = ritually unclean / impure according to religion eg.     -- dog, pig, semen, faeces, blood, urine, dead things, the infidel, alcohol [comment:  the PC whitewashed Wikipedia version of this entry has left out that the infidel (ie the non believer) is considered 'unclean'.   Wikipedia body of entries is therefore unreliable.] Interviewer mentions: -- Canada:   govt.  trying to speed up rate at which immigrants from Muslim countries enter -- for any culture, there is a limit from how many individuals one may take from different culture and absorb that different culture -- beyond that, you start to have different cultures clash -- West has reached a limit some years ago -- it is at the point of demographic and social experiment of an unprecedented scale -- we cannot afford it -- suggests an in situ assistance response in lieu of mass immigration -- Gulf countries would not accept co-religionist refugees (share culture, share language, share religion) -- by which moral compass is it incumbent upon a culture like Germany to completely alter its culture, while Saudi Arabia does nothing? -- intelligentsia driven by cultural and moral relativism -- Denmark repatriation program:  voluntary / immigrants get money to leave -- however, they then move back to Denmark again & are not expected to pay back the money given [Comment:  the West is doomed.  Any culture that is that stupid probably deserves to be swallowed whole.] Reform of scriptures discussed -- refer to 'illegal' acts (beating women, beheading, religiously taking over the world, eradicating Jews mentioned) -- therefore many parts would have to be removed to make it legal to practice in West -- Austria can only preach in German, in certified version of religious text -- cited as a good start -- a national authority to track sources of radical religion suggested -- However, interviewer not optimistic re scripture reformation (given it is seeking to alter the character or essence of the doctrine etc) Interviewer considers immigration open on basis that 100% Western values prevail -- end -- The Danish guy seems overly laid back and optimistic about Western Europe's capabilities to effect change to shape, or curb, the undesirable consequences of mass immigration.  If you look at how Denmark has handled failed voluntary repatriation, it's obvious that those at the top in Europe are completely ineffectual, either due to incompetence or intent. I'm more onboard with the interviewer's views, except that I don't think mass non-European immigration of any kind (whether ideologically onboard with the prevailing culture or not) is a rational choice.   Imagine filling Japan with Italians, Russians, Swedes, Germans and Englishmen, to the point where something like 15% or more of Japan is European.  Even if all these Europeans outwardly observed Japanese culture, they are *not* Japanese, will never be Japanese, and would inevitably alter the composition and character of Japan.  So how would this be a desirable outcome for the Japanese? It sounds like Europe is in dire straits and Canada is also voluntarily heading that way (irrespective of the mountain of evidence that supports heading in the opposite direction), as the Canadian government pursues a fast-track mass immigration policy.  The Canadian government is therefore grossly negligent. What I cannot comprehend is why.  Why would anybody wish to irreversibly alter the character of their societies, transforming their nations into something that is polarised, contentious, splintered, problematic and, ultimately, an existential threat to the host populations? Who wakes up and doesn't want Canada Canadian, Scotland Scottish, Denmark Danish, Sweden Swedish, Italy Italian or Germany German? That just doesn't make any sense to me.

Germany Rises: Traitor Rat Minister Heiko Maas Chased Off - May Day

Heiko Maas What a c*cksucker Thank you, Germany! ------/\/\/ Maas Muss Gehen! Germany Rises: Traitor Rat Minister Heiko Maas Chased Off - May Day Facebook ist schuld Facebook is to blame source | rechtsvorlinks LOL ... Angela Merkel swallowing American c*ck is very funny "Get out, Traitor!" German People Chase Off Traitor Rat Minister of Justice Heiko Maas to his Armoured Mercedes https://youtu.be/J9rvjdB-VRc ------/\/\/   Ist Maas der bessere Himmler? Is Maas the better Himmler? http://halbpfosten.blogspot.com/2016/02/maas-vs-himmler.html I burnt my caramel sauce looking at this ... LOL http://www.thedailysheeple.com/germans-shout-down-and-chase-pro-migrant-minister_052016 “Leftist Rat”-Germans Shout Down and Chase Pro-Migrant Politician May 2, 2016 | Joshua Krause | The Daily Sheeple | 1,275 views Ever the elitist, Heiko Maas has consistently promoted the cause of migrants at the expense of native Germans over the years. To him, there is no such thing as a German. Everyone is a migrant, and their culture isn’t worth protecting after what Germany did in World War 2. He’s demanded that the German people change their lifestyles to accommodate the migrants, and he fully supports subsidizing the migrants with Germany’s hard earned tax dollars. On top of that, he has expanded censorship laws, and has demanded more jail time and fines for people who post “hate speech” online. To him, being opposed to a multicultural Germany is a thought crime that must be stamped out. Fortunately Heiko Maas received a populist reality check yesterday at the hands of an outraged crowd of working class citizens, during a May Day celebration speech. He was repeatedly called a “traitor” and a “leftist rat,” and was eventually chased off the stage. http://www.thedailysheeple.com/germans-shout-down-and-chase-pro-migrant-minister_052016 ------/\/\/

EU Supranational Rape & Extortion

EU Supranational Rape & Extortion Rape of National Sovereignty,  Rape of Democracy & Forced Invasion Program RT News Put up or pay up: EC wants to fine EU members €250,000 per refused refugee Published time: 4 May, 2016 05:12 Edited time: 4 May, 2016 12:11 EU member states could soon be charged hundreds of millions of euros for denying asylum to refugees if the European Commission has its way. The scheme is considered one of the most contentious parts of the revision to the so-called Dublin asylum regulation, which allows northern EU countries to deport refugees to their port of first entry. The €250,000 fine per refugee ($289,659) was reportedly agreed upon during Monday’s meeting. However, the fine is not yet set in stone and could be subject to negotiation. “The size of the contribution may change, but the idea is to make it appear like a sanction,” an official familiar with the proposal told the Financial Times. READ MORE: ‘We cannot shoulder whole world's burden’: Austria adopts tough refugee laws The commission’s goal is to redistribute the weight of the refugee crisis from countries such as Greece by introducing automatic asylum quotas for each EU member state. So far, the commission’s scheme to relocate 160,000 asylum-seekers has reportedly not even reached one percent of its target. Some of the countries opposed to the draft plan include Poland, Slovakia, Romania, and Hungary. Under the new proposal, a country such as Poland, which has an existing quota of 6,500, would have to pay over 1 billion euros ($1.1 billion) if it were to refuse to accept any refugees, according to Financial Times.   Another example is Hungary, which has a quota of 1,294 but has offered no places to asylum seekers so far. Under the new plan, the country would be forced to pay a fine of 323 million euros ($3.7 million).  Following news of the proposal, Slovak Interior Minister Robert Kaliňák said the quota plan does not “respect reality.” The worst refugee crisis in Europe since World War II is ongoing, with most asylum seekers arriving on the continent from the Middle East and particularly Syria, where around 250,000 people have been killed and more than 12 million displaced since a civil war began there in 2011, according to the latest UN figures. Over one million refugees reached Europe’s shores in 2015. More recent figures from a February report compiled by the International Organization for Migration reveal that more than 100,000 people arrived in Greece and another 7,507 entered Italy since the beginning of 2016. Earlier on Wednesday, the Commission backed a visa-free travel agreement with Turkey after Ankara threatened to back out of a landmark migration deal. Under the agreement, all illegal migrants reaching Greece from Turkey's shores are to be returned. In exchange, the EU agreed to take thousands of Syrian refugees directly from Turkey. ‘Counting refugees’ While the European Commission considers imposing stricter refugee laws, EU countries seem more concerned with assessing the number of refugees using their services. For example, bus drivers in northern France were reportedly told to count the number of migrants using the Twisto transport company based out of Caen, according to the France Bleu channel. The company’s bus service has a route that runs from the center of Caen to the Ouistréham ferry terminal, which has become a hot spot for refugees who want to eventually cross over to the UK. Forms have reportedly been distributed that require Twisto drivers to fill in boxes asking for information such as: “Number of migrants inspected” and “Number of migrants booked.” Another document asks the drivers to record where the migrants got off the bus. France Bleu channel suggested that the order to keep track of refugees came from police, but local police chief Laurent Fiscus denied the allegations. However, he added that acquiring such information could be very useful. “Public transport drivers and conductors can provide information whether it’s about migrants or other problems,” Fiscus told the channel. “The national and municipal police need this kind of information.” https://www.rt.com/news/341744-eu-refugees-quotas-fines/   Criminal Quota Scheme NOT EVEN 1% OF TARGET This is a program of INVASION Wake Up, Morons Sane European countries (Poland, Slovakia, Romania & Hungary) need to band together & threaten to pull out together.  Do a deal.  Sign an agreement of opposed solidarity stipulating you will exit the EU.  Better yet, pull out ASAP. The fines on Poland and on Hungary are extortion and rape of European national sovereignty.  Furthermore, they are anti-democratic.  This is supranational body dictatorship, using extortion as a means of violating the wishes of the national inhabitants (who have to live with the consequences of this invasion).  Revolt.  March on Brussels. Better yet, pull out of the EU:  now. Mass movement into Europe from "particularly Syria" has not been the case from what I've read.  Syrian arrivals have been the minority.  The invasion arrivals to Europe have been from all over the place, just as they have been whenever there has been a designated 'crisis' country from which Europe accepts 'refugees' (see Kosovo crisis used by third world arrivals from all over the shop to access Europe and Britain / which would no doubt be a pattern that has repeated itself, particularly in the last decade of US-led hostilities against a string of countries).  Well, Europe, maybe there's something to be said for not funding, training and otherwise supporting destabilisation of other nations, as the US-led Western capitalists have done, destabilising and assaulting Syria (among a string of Middle Eastern / African nations). However, the consequences of this are not Europe's problem. Or they wouldn't be if a bunch of crooks weren't running the European Union dictatorship scam.  Tell these nation-destroyer puppets to go and f*ck themselves.  Tell them:  Noooooooooooooo. European people need to stand up and say 'No!' to the accelerated invasion and destruction of their homelands, in what is a long-standing Western program of facilitating invasion and dismemberment of Europe. C'mon, Europe.  It's now or never. That 'one million' arrivals referred to in the article, you can probably double, as they're not going to be even remotely honest about the horrific figures of this invasion (and an overall program of accelerated invasion that has been ongoing for a decade, if not more). And then you can multiply the arrivals figure (anyone's guess what it may be), by around x8 per person further 'family reunion' foreign arrivals. Then add to that well over replacement level reproduction rates that will endure, in what is a reproductive cycle that will NEVER stop. So, this is not like sheltering a box of puppies.  It is a serious national problem with serious and enduring national consequences. Turkey appears to have blackmailed the EU criminals into giving Turkey's nationals visa-free travel? Got to be kidding.  Say hello to flow of all kinds of undesirable follow-on consequences (like:  terrorists, weapons, drugs, people trafficking, crime and more invaders) from over the Turkish borders (domestic and as transit point). The criminals that run the EU ought to be strung up. Turkey, which has had a hand in destabilisation and destruction of Syria, now has European people take on the human blow-back on behalf of Turkey, Israel, USA and the oligarchs that control European governments.  And the Gulf Arabs. Europe, tell them ALL to get f*cked, you're not destroying your own nations for  to profit European millionaires, or that of USA, Turkey, or Israel.  Oh, and the Saudis and the Qataris, who must be in hysterics over your stupidity (as they're happy to meddle, but they won't be accepting any of the consequences for themselves). And don't believe for one moment that illegal invaders (as opposed to the 'legal' invaders) will be deported.  The vast majority will never be deported.  All invaders need do is destroy their identification and Europe is stuck with them.  But even without having destroyed identification, they're next to impossible to remove due to the 'human rights' conventions that drive the program of invasion and dismemberment of Europe, and the endless legal avenues for blocking deportation.  Furthermore, even if Europe goes to the vast expense and trouble of getting the go-ahead to deport, Europe can still expect to be stuck with invaders earmarked for deportation, when their own countries REFUSE to accept them as deportees (which they do). Any nation that is stupid enough to let invaders onto their soil is stuck with them and the consequences that are inherent in accepting them:  forever.   Do not do it.   Get the EU puppets to get Saudi Arabia to host them.  Oh, wait ... the Saudi's don't want the disruption and terrorism risk.  Exit the EU.  Tell Turkey to f*ck off.  Declare martial law.  Arm everybody that is capable of holding a machine-gun and defend your countries as your ancestors would have done. *Stand by for the next terror attack, when France doesn't even know who is in France (because of open borders) and needs to get bus drivers, FFS, to keep any eye on movements.

What's Not to Like About Multiculturalism?

What's Not to Like About Multiculturalism? https://youtu.be/Dc0tm_pE7i8 -------/\/\/ Hey, Europe:  look how well 'multiculturalism' is coming along across the Atlantic, in USA, during Donald Trump's presidential campaign. Trump is described as: 'polarising' 'extreme' 'populist' & appealing to 'raw sentiments' So now it's 'polarising' and 'extreme' to be an American patriot of European descent, who wishes to take measures to retain the character  of a nation built by one's forefathers? Or that's what California's majority Mexican flag-wavers and the leftist rent-a-rabble would have you believe, as they run amok, threatening violence, damaging police vehicles, and causing general disturbance and public nuisance, in an attempt to disrupt an American presidential candidate's campaign.  Actions which not only harass a political candidate, but also threaten and infringe upon the rights of his supporters. Let the rowdy rabble be a warning:  the Western ruling oligarchy planned program of invasion and dispossession of European society (sold as 'multiculturalism' and as economic 'good') produces highly undesirable consequences that are dangerously in conflict with future efforts to maintain the integrity of European societies (wherever they may exit). Meanwhile in Britain:  David Cameron, the British PM douche-bag, whose country has been given away from underneath Britons by politicians much like Dave, attempts to score political points by describing Trump as 'divisive, stupid & wrong'. It doesn't get any more stupid and wrong than importing terrorism, importing race riots, importing social problems, importing taxpayer costs, importing displacement of one's own people, importing dismemberment of one's own society, and importing what will destroy one's society in due course.  What a conning, despicable, political-point-scoring, whoring clown, that off-shore-account-holding Dave Cameron is.  F*ck off, Dave.  Impress us all by moving to Kabul or Mexico City. -------/\/\/ Further reading: Oligarchy-Owned American Politics | Soros Buys Hillary 2016 LINK | Post If it weren't for all that militarised police and FBI political policing, the oppressed Americans would have had a revolution by now.

Russia: C'mon Barbie Let's Go Party

DEFENCE NEWS C'mon Barbie Let's Go Party Feminist Foreign Policy Invasion of Europe EU 'Defence' Ministers v. Russian Fed's Sergey Shoygu [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE] LULZ at: Russia Insider C'mon Barbie Let's Go Party  Bad Romance EU-NATO Capitalist Rule Pussy Puppet PR Appointees   [CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE] expect: Capitalist exploitation Europeans A NUKES TARGET on escalation of U.S. NATO AGGRESSION U.S. PROVOCATION SUICIDAL THIRD WORLD INVASION POLICY brought to you by capitalist puppeteers HIDING UNDER SKIRTS Are Sweden, Norway, & Netherlands even sovereign states?  Never mind Germany. Germany hasn't been since WWII. Countdown to Sharia

Theory: EU About to Declare Jihad

Theory: EU About to Declare Jihad European Union and its US-NATO masters to launch a PROXY 'jihad' on Russia (like the one they've arranged in Syria), using the mass population movement of Middle Eastern and African Muslims that have flooded European states as an attack force on Russia's Western Front. That's why they keep losing terrorists.  They're probably in training in the east of Europe somewhere.  Probably Ukraine.   That way, Russia would be forced to fight wars with suicidal religious zealots from both the southern border and from the Western (preposterous) 'Germany is a country of immigration' flank, in addition to fighting for any vital interests Russia may have in the Middle East or elsewhere? What other explanation can there be to accept able-bodied aggressive invaders by the gazillions for years now ... despite the MASSIVE DESTRUCTION & COSTS FACTOR? But Russia has nukes.  So I'm not sure how that fits into this theory of war to be.  As in, if you're fighting with nukes, you don't need infantry. Would Russia nuke?  Russia should.  I'd have maybe given a pre-emptive strike by now. What is there to lose if Europe is finished?  It's the end. -------/\/\/ This guy has another theory ... it's the European Union that's going down: ISIS Takes the Capital of the European Union EXTRACTS [may not be exact order] "The dream of uniting Europe isn’t just dead. It’s a virulent cancer that routes hordes of angry young Muslim men from Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Eritrea to loot, rape and murder their way across Europe." "At the heart of the EU’s rot in Brussels are No-Go Zones controlled by Jihadists. Despite all of Belgium’s gun laws, in Molenbeek, Jihadists buy and sell at the Great Bazaar of Kalashshnikovs. The bazaar is stocked and the terrorists move in and out of Brussels thanks to the open borders of the EU." "The latest terror attack in Brussels has been called “an attack on all of Europe.” But it’s Brussels, with the insistence on open borders and open migrant policies, that is the real attack on all of Europe." The capital of the European Union will be one of the first cities in Europe to fall to the invaders.   Brussels is where Europe’s future died. It is the first real outpost of the Islamic State in Europe. It shows us Europe’s terrible future if the invasion does not end. https://counterjihadreport.com/2016/03/23/isis-takes-the-capital-of-the-european-union/ [Comment:  mere cessation isn't enough]

Immigration: How Genocidal Politicians Fuck the European Public & Dispossess Indigenous Europeans

FUCK THE PLEBS FORMULA U.K. LABOUR CASE STUDY Immigration:  How Genocidal Politicians Fuck the European Public & Dispossess Indigenous Europeans Summary (Daily Mail Article) SOURCE How Blair silenced debate over migrant influx and refused to acknowledge public's doubts about open borders By Tom Bower for the Daily Mail Published: 10:32 EST, 27 February 2016 | Updated: 23:39 EST, 27 February 2016  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466499/Conman-betrayed-Britain-immigration-utterly-amoral-PM-led-conspiracy-let-MILLIONS-migrants-breaking-rules-deceiving-public.html -------/\/\/ Summary -- Tony Blair tells Jack Straw:  ‘Immigration is good for Britain.’ -- three terms of office -- over 2 million more migrants than govt expected settled UK -- Blair: dismissed concerns on basis of 'good for the economy' -- anyone against:  deemed 'racist Tory' -- reinforced by BBC reluctance to debate issue -- reinforced by BBC endorsing Labour promotion of 'multiculturalism' -- preference of migrants for segregated communities never addressed -- encouraged foreigners to believe there was no need to 'integrate' -- post 1997:  Sarah Spencer, academic, influence on govt policy -- Spencer admitted later:  there was no policy for 'integration' -- 7/7 bombings London by Islamist terrorists failed to alert Blair of danger -- ignored Muslim preachers (x2) advocating violence London streets -- Jack Straw advised that Muslims must not be alienated -- after 1999 election issue became FLOW OF BOGUS ASYLUM SEEKERS -- that's the only time it concerned Tony Blair -- used sleight of hand with full connivance of Tony Blair to 'solve' problem -- 350,000 asylum-seekers converted into 'economic immigrants' & given work permits & benefits rights -- Labour lost control of immigration AND ACTIVELY ENCOURAGED IT -- Blair refused to appoint dedicated Cabinet committee or special adviser -- only appointed adviser mid-way -- ignoring immigration set the tone on issue -- Blair, the war criminal, then introduced:  the HUMAN RIGHTS BILL -- 'ASYLUM SEEKER' GUARANTEE BRITISH COURT ASSESSMENT -- interpreted as a green light to all-comers -- Tory warnings:  UK honeypot for third world economic migrants -- who entered as tourists & then claimed asylum -- were dismissed as 'racist' -- 1995:  asylum seekers claim more than £200 million in benefits -- of those, only 5% were 'genuine refugees' -- Jack Straw insisted all arrivals be accepted as genuine 'refugees' -- 'approved nations' list instructed to be expanded (by Straw) -- Nigerians, Afghans & others could claim asylum -- immigration HQ - 2-year 52,000 backlog of asylum applicants -- applications riddled with lies -- top attitude filtered down:  loose with appraisals & Briton's interests -- even failed applicants became entitled to benefits -- promise of easy money spread across the globe -- steep increase in asylum seeking arrivals -- immigration head Tim Walker suggest English speaking proviso -- Jack Straw refused qualification / opted for stronger borders -- behind the scenes Jack Straw continued to make it easy for invaders -- THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL ALBANIANS & IRAQIS ENTER POSING AS KOSOVO REFUGEES -- could not identify local landmarks etc. -- next batch of Albanians passed with flying colours -- were briefed by their British taxpayer funded c*nt 'human rights' lawyer scumbags on the 'human rights' *DISPOSSESSION FRAUD* gravy train, the c*cksuckers -- Straw & Blair answer:  food stamps in lieu of cash as deterrence -- HOWEVER, makes no difference:  BETTER STANDARD OF LIVING PREVAILS -- officials approve dodgy applications rather than ENGAGE IN ENDLESS APPEALS before judges -- judges interpretation of HR law FAVOURED BOGUS APPLICANTS -- PUBLICLY govt spoke of stepping up deportations -- BUT, IN FACT, INSUFFICIENT STAFF TO CARRY OUT DEPORTATIONS -- chaos spread:  deportations declined, backlog increased -- result:  INVITATION FOR MORE TO TURN UP -- Kent Council:  blocks of flats & even streets were foreign territory -- Blair ignored probs -- Blair announced Labour making it easier for FOREIGN STUDENTS to study in Britain -- officials warned Jack Straw:  foreign students AMOUNTED TO AN INVITATION for BOGUS STUDENTS -- to enrol in SHAM LANGUAGE SCHOOLS & to REMAIN after VISA EXPIRY -- result:  additional 75,000 students following year -- as immigration mounted: -- Straw - 1999 law:     -- OUTLAWED BOGUS MARRIAGE     -- fined LORRY DRIVERS FOR SMUGGLING MIGRANTS     -- *slightly* REDUCED BENEFITS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS -- HOWEVER:  very same law STRENGTHENED RIGHTS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS -- allowed them to stay in Britain until they exhausted all appeals -- lawyers patrolling Heathrow -- clients off planes assured of lengthy delays -- [comment:  not sure if this is literal or not] -- news re 'tolerant' UK spread, encouraging:     -- Kurds     -- Tamils     -- Sri Lankans -- meanwhile, migrants from Balkans & Afghanistan, head for Calais -- board lorries to be smuggled into UK -- tens of thousands others, DESTROY IDENTITY DOCUMENTS -- *MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR OFFICIALS TO DEPORT THEM* -- tens of thousands of new asylum applications -- MARRIAGE RACKETS flourishing -- lawyers SCHOOLING APPLICANTS in what to tell immigration officers -- by June 1999 backlog went from start of Labour 52,000 to 125,000 -- legal immigration soared to 360,000 -- Britain was becoming known as the asylum capital of Europe -- increasing media outcry -- Blair blamed surge in numbers on:     -- improved economy     -- failure to make ID cards compulsory -- Blair was careful never publicly to mention rising number of immigrants from India & Pakistan --housing, schools & healthcare for additional 300,000 arriving per year -- not considered by Labour -- consequences to British working class not considered: -- 23 British workers displaced for every 100 foreign-born workers employed UK   [comment:  the rest on benefits?  No, reference is for every 100 *employed*.  But doing what?  What are the job creation figures and how do the 'new jobs' figures relate to merely supporting what is self-erasing invasion (eg provision of housing, health, education, food & supplies transport logistics etc to maintain a foreign population).  Sort of like a 'ponzi scheme' of economic 'prosperity' by invasion. ] -- Barbara Roche appointed:  Junior Immigration Minister -- deport bogus asylum seekers, only instruction to Roche -- Roche wasn't following directive     -- 'should be allowed to stay'     -- removal 'takes too long'     -- 'it's emotional'     -- bogus 'negative feeling' says Roche -- *Roche wanted more immigrants -- Roche worked on speech:     -- outlined 'advantages' of reducing controls on immigration     -- portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour -- Roche argued for more work permits for migrants -- despite number souring to 40,000 from 25,000 (start Labour office) -- more work permits, according to Roche = drop pretence of 'asylum seeker' -- described economic immigrants as:     -- entrepreneurs     -- scientists     -- high technology specialists     -- 'global economy' clockwork components -- refused to set figure:  said it would be 'foolish' -- Roche was unsung economic migrants as SMOKESCREEN FOR INCREASING IMMIGRATION -- pro-immigration lobby assumed Blair endorsed Roche’s views -- her speech passed relatively unnoticed -- migrants quickly grasped its importance & passed news on -- Britain would provide benefits and state housing -- Roche legacy:  more migrants camped in squalor -- benefits began attracting Somalis from other EU countries -- over 200,000 Somalis arrived -- most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare -- Home Office *COULD* have refused them entry -- *but hey were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’ -- Blair remained mute about large influx -- 2001:  Straw replaced by David Blunkett, who inherited mess -- 2000:  97,000 asylum applications (record number) -- only 10,185 were 'genuine' -- only 4,870 were deported -- Blunkett neither discussed nor reduced immigration of ‘family members’ -- then running at 210,00 per annum from India -- David Blunkett then decided to: -- admit asylum seekers as skilled migrants -- Blair approved the ruse -- Blair gives Blunkett go-ahead to issue 150,000 WORK PERMITS in 2002 -- numbers rose -- over 500,000 migrants (vs original estimate of 100,000) by end year -- Labour only concerned w/ deportation with the more bogus asylum seekers -- Blunkett sought to build:  15 detention centres -- Gordon Brown only approved 3 -- trade unions & migrants dislike voucher system -- Blair says get rid of voucher system -- thought to deter 100,000 per annum -- Blunkett agrees to discontinue vouchers -- Labour govt then reduces backlog of asylum applications -- BY APPROVING ENTRY OF 50,000 MORE -- Labour plan was not to discuss 'advantages' of immigration in public -- BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DOES NOT EVEN WANT THAT LABOUR:  DELIBERATE EXPLOITATION & VIOLATION OF INDIGENOUS BRITONS -- so Labour govt instructed to only publicly discuss 'efforts' to stop 'bad' immigration -- amnesty for 50,000 asylum seekers quietly extended to include 150,000 illegals --  eg. granting of a work permit to one-legged Romanian who described himself as a roofer -- more migrants arrive -- 2010:  591,000 = 5 times higher than when Blair assumed office -- 2003:  x4 Algerian asylum seekers, all on benefits -- arrested London & Manchester  making bomb containing poison ricin -- resulting outcry -- Blair calls Blunkett -- Blair puts on a BBC TV performance for public re reduction -- Labour PM employed an empty promise to defuse a problem -- he was governing Britain via the media -- Blunkett instructs immigration HQ to fast-track:     -- more asylum applications; &     -- speed up the approval of work permits     -- decisions remained unannounced -- at start of Blair’s third term 85% electorate condemned govt policy -- Labour continued to pursue policies regardless http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466499/Conman-betrayed-Britain-immigration-utterly-amoral-PM-led-conspiracy-let-MILLIONS-migrants-breaking-rules-deceiving-public.html How mass immigration obliterates England’s identity The left promotes globalization with their open borders and immigration policies EXTRACT  By Robert W. Merry - - Monday, January 11, 2016 ANALYSIS/OPINION: Benjamin Schwarz has produced an expository piece on the impact of Britain’s mass immigration policies of the past 20 years that constitutes what is probably the most probing analysis of those policies to be seen on this side of the pond — and probably on the other side as well. Titled “Unmaking England: Will immigration demolish in decades a nation built over centuries?” it appears in the current issue of The American Conservative magazine. (Disclosure: I sit on the board of the American Ideas Institute, which publishes the magazine.) ... The result is a profound transformation not only in British demographics, but also in British politics, culture, economics, national identity and the social fabric. Serious tensions are emerging in the polity that wouldn’t be there if the country had continued its immigration policies that prevailed before 1948 — going all the way back at least to the Conquest in 1066. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/11/robert-merry-how-mass-immigration-obliterates-engl/ United Kingdom 1948     Monarch - George VI, King of the United Kingdom (1936–1952)     Prime Minister - Clement Attlee,  Labour PM of UK (1945–1951) Decolonisation -- responsible for beginning the process of decolonisation of the British Empire, starting by granting independence to India -- Britain creates the Pakistan Muslim majority state -- (which then incorporated East Pakistan, now Bangladesh) -- redrawing borders: -- large-scale population movements & heavy bloodshed both sides -- independence of Burma and Ceylon negotiated -- new countries became British Dominions -- modern 'Commonwealth of Nations' established -- most demanding problem was supposedly 'future' of Palestine Mandate -- *but future of Palestine decided WWI in exchange US entry into war -- Truman govt & Zionist movement perceived British policies as pro-Arab -- [so preferential treatment to Arabs not likely - Israel was a done deal] -- armed Zionist militants increase violence on Arab population -- UK wealth of experience subordinating nations, 'couldn't' control this? -- evacuated troops / handed matter to United Nations -- major UK military base built in Kenya -- austerity Budget 1950 - cost of UK participation in Korean War -- African colonies under unprecedented direct control of UK -- schemes implemented to:     -- address post-war balance of payments crisis     -- raise African living standards [as if .. who writes this crap]     -- new colonialism a failure -- using the Dominions of Canada, Australia, & New Zealand as a model -- transformation of the Empire into the Commonwealth -- establishment of political & economic consensus on governance of Britain -- all parties, whether Labour, Conservative or Liberal subscribed to -- entry says 'for 3 decades' but that is incorrect:  it continues to this day -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Attlee Commonwealth of Nations -- formally constituted by the London Declaration in 1949 -- the big lies*:     -- shared values:     -- democracy     -- human rights     -- rule of law -- estimated population of 2.328 billion, nearly third of world pop. (2013) -- 17% of the gross world product -- when measured in purchasing power parity (PPP) -- 14% of the gross world product when measured nominally -- UK 1932 founded the 'New Commonwealth Society' -- aimed at the creation of an international air force to be arm of the League of Nations -- 'New Commonwealth' term -- recently decolonised countries, predominantly non-white and developing -- often used in debates about immigration from these countries -- British trade w/ Commonwealth was 4 times larger than trade w/ Europe -- late 1950s:  Plan G to create a European free trade zone -- proposals stalled -- Commonwealth of Nations -- objectives were first outlined in 1971 Singapore Declaration -- ostensible commitment of Commonwealth of Nations: -- world peace; -- promotion of representative 'democracy'; -- promotion of individual 'liberty'; -- promotion of pursuit of 'equality'; -- opposition to 'racism'; -- 'fight' against poverty, ignorance, and disease; -- FREE TRADE -- objectives reinforced by:  Harare Declaration in 1991 -- current highest-priority aims:     -- promotion of 'democracy' & 'development' -- outlined in the 2003 Aso Rock Declaration -- built on Singapore and Harare declarations -- terms of reference:     -- democracy     -- good governance     -- human rights     -- gender equality     -- more equitable sharing of  'benefits of GLOBALISATION' *leaked memo from Sec/ Gen. instructing staff not to speak on human rights published in Oct 2010 see: -- Commonwealth Heads of Government -- Commonwealth Eminent Persons Group panel -- among recomm. repeal laws re homosexuality in 41 C'wth states 2011 -- failure to release the report -- ministerial management group was empowered with enforcement -- group includes alleged human rights offenders -- agreed to develop a charter of values for the Commonwealth -- without any decision on how compliance to be enforced -- 2013:  new Charter of the Commonwealth -- opposes: "all forms of discrimination, whether rooted in gender, race, colour, creed, political belief or other grounds" -- EU is already in the process of negotiating free trade agreements with many Commonwealth countries -- no formal free trade agreement b/w Commonwealth of Nations members -- but trade to 50% more with member states than non-member, on average 2009 poll on 60th anniversary of founding Commonwealth of Nations -- public of 7 member states polled:     -- Australia     -- Canada     -- India     -- Jamaica     -- Malaysia     -- South Africa     -- UK -- most people in these countries largely ignorant of the Commonwealth activities -- support for the Commonwealth twice as high in developing countries as in developed countries -- lowest in Great Britain -- HQ:  Marlborough House, London -- member states:  53 -- see:      •      Balfour Declaration         19 November 1926      •      Statute of Westminster   11 December 1931      •      London Declaration         28 April 1949 -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations *cannot value 'human rights' while obliterating rights of one's people & obliterating one's people as an entity *democracy is a lie:  the many are ruled by the few, & the vital interests of the many that constitute THE PEOPLE are violated by those that rule COMMENT This misses the point. Whether deemed 'genuine' 'asylum seekers' or not, the consequences to the indigenous European are the same.  So this is an irrelevancy.   And all those so-called 'extremists' are correct:  it's a deliberate program of dispossession and genocide of Europeans by the political scum that interface between the public and whoever pulls their strings. Bear in mind, this is not a mere Blair 'accident' or incompetence.  This is a f*cking deliberate program dating back to the late 1940s. But the lying c*cksucker press would have you believe it was just the result of voting in the Labour a$$holes. All politicians are the same and the program remains the same. PS ... check out the 'Commonwealth of Nations' supranational government that pretends to be all about 'human rights' ... but it's about trade and profit.