InfoLink - Louis B Susman - US Ambassador to London (Jul 2009 - Apr 2013)

ꕤ Info/Ref Louis B Susman former US Ambassador to Britain (2009-2013) as marked SUMMARY Louis B Susman -- based Chicago -- lawyer 27 years: St. Louis-based Thompson & Mitchell -- mergers & acquisitions -- 20 years making deals as a Chicago-based investment banker -- at Salomon Brothers (later merged Citigroup, 1998) -- key role Dayton Hudson's buy of Marshall Field's -- key role LG Electronics' buy  of Zenith Electronics -- x2 deals that changed the Chicago corporate landscape -- former Citigroup Corporate and Investment Banking -- retired investment banker & lawyer -- major fund-raiser for Obama's first presidential campaign -- 2009 appointed US Ambassador to Britain by Barak Obama -- July 10, 2009 -  April 3, 2013 -- 2013 retired as Ambassador to United Kingdom Non-executive chairman:  DJE Holdings -- family-owned parent company of Edelman and Zeno Group -- joins board at public relations giant Edelman -- Edelman world's largest public relations firm -- f. Chicago 1952 (Daniel Edelman) -- Chicago & NY bases -- 4,600 employed, 66 offices -- annual billings:  $665 million http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-04-03/business/chi-exambassador-sussman-joins-edelman-parent-20130403_1_richard-edelman-investment-banking-investment-banker Fait Accompli Louis B Susman, Chairman [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. source https://archive.is/XRTLc international event-planning company co-owner & managing director Alex Fitzgibbon husband of American-Swedish 'corporacratic' heiress Cristina Stenbeck - particulars here FOI RELEASE Official US government e-mail (27 Nov. 2010) re WIKILEAKS MATERIAL RELEASE Just Prior to 'Coincidental' Handy London Arrest of Julian Assange [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. http://graphics.wsj.com/hillary-clinton-email-documents/pdfs/C05771811.pdf The Guardian 1 DAY PRIOR TO ASSANGE ARREST IN LONDON http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/05/julian-assange-lawyers-being-watched Julian Assange's lawyers say they are being watched WikiLeaks founder's lawyers also accuse US state department of inappropriate behaviour in not respecting attorney-client protocol Sam Jones and agencies @swajones Monday 6 December 2010 03.16 AEDT Lawyers representing the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, say that they have been surveilled by members of the security services and have accused the US state department of behaving "inappropriately" by failing to respect attorney-client protocol. Jennifer Robinson and Mark Stephens of the law firm Finers Stephens Innocent told the Guardian they had been watched by people parked outside their houses for the past week. "I've noticed people consistently sitting outside my house in the same cars with newspapers," said Robinson. "I probably noticed certain things a week ago, but mostly it's been the last three or four days." Stephens said he, too, had had his home watched. Asked who he thought was monitoring him, he said: "The security services." Robinson said the legal team was also experiencing "other forms of pressure" from Washington. She pointed to a letter from a state department legal adviser – addressed to both Assange and her – which appeared to bracket together client and lawyer as if to suggest that WikiLeaks and its lawyers were one and the same. The letter, which was released to the press, begins: "Dear Ms Robinson and Mr Assange. I am writing in response to your 26 November 2010 letter to US Ambassador Louis B Susman regarding your intention to again publish on your WikiLeaks site what you claim to be classified US government documents." Robinson said: "By eliding client and lawyer, that was a very inappropriate attempt to implicate me. That is really inappropriate to come from the state department of all places; they understand very well the rules on attorney-client protocol." She said that although they had requested a public retraction from the state department, no answer had been received. "It's quite a serious situation," she said, adding that, according to the UN's Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, governments should ensure that lawyers "are able to perform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference" and that "lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients' causes as a result of discharging their functions". A spokeswoman for the Home Office declined to comment on the lawyers' surveillance claims. Assange, who is staying in Britain, has come under growing pressure from politicians in the US and around the world after his site started publishing excerpts from a cache of 250,000 secret American diplomatic cables last week. It emerged on Saturday that Australian police are investigating whether Assange, an Australian citizen, has broken any of the country's laws and is liable to prosecution there. The foreign minister, Kevin Rudd, said: "The Australian government unequivocally condemns the action by any of those responsible for the unauthorised release of classified and confidential information and diplomatic communications between states." Swedish prosecutors have sent an international arrest warrant to the Metropolitan police, seeking the extradition of Assange for questioning on allegations – which he strongly denies – of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.   [Comment:  How convenient, Sweden !!!] Stephens today denounced the extradition warrant as a "political stunt" and said Assange would fight deportation to Sweden on the grounds that it could lead to him being handed over to the US, where senior politicians have called for him to be executed. The former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has described him as "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" and called for him to be hunted down like a Taliban leader, while another senior Republican, Mike Huckabee, has said that "anything less than execution is too kind a penalty" for his actions. Stephens said that Sweden's chief prosecutor had told Assange in September that there was no case for him to answer, following complaints against him by two women, but the investigation was revived following the intervention of a Swedish politician.  [comment:  women did NOT make 'complaints' -- they  reportedly sought 'ADVICE', which just happens to be a convenient way to make false statements without being punished for doing so in Sweden - see legal comment below.  Note also:  Sweden police failed to follow protocols and the police database was tampered with, along with other irregularities.] He said that Swedish prosecutors knew where Assange was and urged them to call him to discuss the case. Stephens told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "It is quite bizarre, because the chief prosecutor in Sweden dropped the entire case against him, saying there was absolutely nothing for him to find back in September, and then a few weeks later on – after the intervention of a Swedish politician – a new prosecutor, not in Stockholm where Julian and these women had been, but in Gothenburg, began a new case which has resulted in these warrants and the Interpol Red Notice being put out." He added: "It does seem to be a political stunt." http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/05/julian-assange-lawyers-being-watched [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. The US govt & shrill Palin (& assorted US airhead) claims that were made were subsequently NOT supported by facts: [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Well, that was interesting. ꕤ

US Propaganda or US Military 'Backchannel' Communication?

ꕤ SYRIA Related Article below: Seymour Hersh Source:  Military Advised White House Against "Assad Must Go" Policy https://www.rt.com/op-edge/327017-hersh-interview-us-syria/ Seymour Hersh Investigative Reporter "There was an ambassador named Robert Ford who was a really I thought sort of crossed the line as an ambassador, because when  ...  he was the ambassador for the US to Syria in Damascus, and when the demonstrations began in early 2011, he actually would go to rallies where the opposition was and urged them to carry on ..." RT News Reporter "Well, we know that [the US] embassy had been working actively to support the opposition, thanks to WikiLeaks." Seymour Hersh Investigative Reporter "Yes, absolutely.  Although most Americans don't know that. I did write about it, but most Americans still don't know about it." ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT I'm having trouble following what is going on (here and in some other article I looked at). The US wants to bring down Assad and has aimed to do so since 2006 or earlier, the US arms and supports Islamist terrorists, the US refuses to co-operate with the Assad government re the ISIS terrorists ... but the US military supposedly (in opposition to the Obama administration) sends word via third parties (Russia, Israel and someone else, I think it was), providing information in order to assist the Assad government in their fight against ISIS terrorists? Why do I have trouble believing any of this? Maybe I'm tired, but none of this computes.  ꕤ

2010 - Obama & Bush - Geneva Conventions of 1949

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/08/11/obama-bush-and-the-geneva-conventions/ http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/08/11/obama-bush-and-the-geneva-conventions/ SUMMARY - 2010 Article Geneva Conventions of 1949 -- international treaties -- x4 separate treaties -- first 3 agreements revised previous treaties -- ie.  dating from 1864, 1906 & 1929 -- humanitarian protections     - for sick or wounded soldiers on land     - sailors at sea     - prisoners of war -- 1949 - fourth agreement: protections for civilians in conflict zones Best known of agreements is:  Third Geneva Convention -- protections for those who qualify as Prisoners of War (POWs) -- USA long objected to certain provisions in First Protocol -- Second Protocol submitted to Senate 1987 -- *Senate DID NOT ACT ON IT -- Bush admin signed & ratified Third Protocol -- creating alternative protection symbol (Red Diamond) for countries -- primarily Israel, that do not use Red Cross or Red Crescent -- x4 1949 protocols = bedrock of international laws of war -- Geneva Conventions applied in:     - Korea     - Vietnam     - First Gulf Wars -- post 9-11, George W Bush admin decides Conventions do not apply to conflict with al Qaeda because al Qaeda not a party to the conventions -- determined that while Afghanistan was party to Conventions, Taliban were not entitled to POW protections -- Bush admin refusal to apply Geneva Conventions (& certain provisions of human rights treaties) condemned:  placing detainees into 'legal black hole'. -- 2006 Supreme Court - rejects Bush admin argument -- US Supreme Court held that EVEN IF Geneva Conventions did not apply in entirety:  COMMON ARTICLE 3 prohibits torture & inhuman or degrading treatment of detainees, including al-Qaeda detainees. -- Obama entered into pledge to restore US respect for international law. -- purportedly banned coercive interrogation methods (torture) -- rescinded Bush's interpretations of Common Article 3 -- 2009, Obama reaffirmed US commitment to "abide by the Geneva Conventions" in his Nobel Prize remarks -- but Obama admin had not as at 2010 applied Conventions as legal framework -- as at 2010 Obama admin held 100's of al-Qaeda & Taliban detainees -- as ENEMY COMBATANTS in Guantanamo & Afghanistan, but -- denied POW status per Third Convention -- denied civilian 'protected persons' status per Fourth Convention -- detainees denied minimum protections for detained persons -- per Article 75 of the First Protocol -- ie. to be told reasons for one's detention Article claims USA has been, for over 100 years, a respected leader in developing international laws of war & suggests USA should engage in dialogue to develop rules. http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/08/11/obama-bush-and-the-geneva-conventions/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Found this an interesting article. [no time to check for typos properly] ꕤ

Libya - Benghazi Assault & Murder & Mumbi Attack

ꕤ Article SOURCE as marked Article Title:  "Ambassador Stevens Was Raped Before His Murder, Reports Claim" Author:  Wolff Bachner re:  Ambassador to Libya -- J. Christopher Stevens Other: EXTRACT - Mumbai Attack "Pakistani Muslim terrorists attacked the Chabad Jewish center during the devastating terror attacks in Mumbai, India, Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, were both tortured and raped, and their bodies were desecrated.  According to the Mumbai Police, the Rabbi was castrated while still alive. “Even the Rabbi and his wife at Nariman House were sexually assaulted and their genitalia mutilated,” said a senior officer of the investigating team." http://www.inquisitr.com/330504/ambassador-stevens-was-raped-before-his-murder-reports-claim/ Note:  the woman victim was 6 months pregnant [source:  DailyMail - here] Article Benghazi: Obama's Actions Amount To A Shameful Dereliction Of Duty Peter Ferrara Oct 25, 2012 @ 09:19 AM "...  Benghazi murders of Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 others, including two Marines ..." "The Obama Administration received requests for additional security from the Embassy and the Ambassador himself as early as February.  An embassy cable on June 25 expressed fear of rising Islamic extremism in eastern Libya around Benghazi, and noted that the black flag of Al-Qaeda “has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities.” "On August 2, Ambassador Stevens sent a cable requesting 11 additional body guards, noting “Host nation security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment for the diplomatic mission of outreach.” "But these requests for additional security were repeatedly denied ..." "Obama and his allies did not want a show of American force in the country that would offend Muslim sensibilities.  They wanted to rely instead on the host country’s security that the embassy was telling them was inadequate and could not be depended upon." "... the day of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, September 11, the White House situation room starts receiving emails at about 1 pm that the mission is under hostile surveillance.  The only response was that the Pentagon sends a drone armed with a video camera so that everyone in Washington can see what transpires in real time, as it happens, at the White House, at the State Department, at the Pentagon, at the CIA." "The drone documents no crowds protesting any video.  But at 4 pm Washington receives an email from the Benghazi mission that it is under military style attack." "The attack was then fed to all of them, the White House, the Pentagon, the State Dept., the CIA, through live video feed.  A later email that day reported, “Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”  The feed showed no protest of any supposedly offensive You Tube video." "Just one hour flight time away were U.S. Air Force bases that could have been rousted in minutes to send fighter planes and attack helicopters that could have routed the attackers in minutes of fighting." Obama & Hillary Clinton: "...  likely knew [correction: they surely knew] the attack on our Benghazi consulate the day before was organized by terrorists.  They knew because they were privy to a flurry of emails among administration officials discussing the attack in real time.  Yet they said nothing about what they knew and, worse, had done nothing to mount a rescue despite American forces being less than an hour away during the seven hour blitz." " The United States Ambassador to Libya, the personal representative of President Barack Obama, had been tortured, sodomized, dragged bloody through the streets of Benghazi, and murdered.  Chris Stevens, along with the two Marines and another who were murdered along with him, had volunteered to serve his country.  But under the leadership of Barack Obama, that is how his service ended." "The Truth-Challenged President But the saga did not end there for the American people.  The rest of us had to endure the President, Secretary of State Clinton, and UN Ambassador “explaining” to us that what really happened was that those irascible Muslims were all incited out of their minds by a previously unseen, unheard of You Tube video trailer by an unknown American immigrant, a movie that was never made outside the trailer advertising it, in Fool on the Hill style.  Their protest had just got out of hand, you see. Except they all knew when they were saying these very words that they were untrue.  They were precisely calculated to deceive and to mislead.  Yet there was our President Obama telling this mendacious fairy tale to the entire world at the U.N.  And there was U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice telling the American people the same concocted fairy tale.  Typical Progressives, they were so certain that they could easily buffalo a majority of their countrymen, no smarter than the representative Homer Simpson." http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/10/25/benghazi-obamas-actions-amount-to-a-shameful-dereliction-of-duty/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT A photo of a guy I suspected had been tortured was going around, but I wasn't sure that's what I was looking at, and I didn't know who it was. It was only after the photo was passed around with a message that it was the US Ambassador being tortured, that it did really look like it was a torture victim.  It also looked like someone may have been holding a cattle prod or something like that (which I didn't spot on initial viewing, when I wasn't entirely sure what I was looking at). Once I had an idea of who it might be, I Googled for information. Some site on the internet denies it was him, but when I keyed in about torture the Forbes article and others came up. I wasn't aware that the people in the Mumbai attacks were sexually assaulted and tortured (that's come just by chance within one of the Benghazi articles). I also wasn't aware that the US Ambassador was sexually assaulted and tortured, and  I think I'd remember having seen something about this in the (admittedly few) Benghazi articles I may have looked at.  I'm shocked and sort of freaked out by that.  It's very disturbing.   Probably moreso because I'd spent some of today looking at Islamic history and getting into listening to associated music. Islamic history isn't as appealing after reading these couple of articles.  I still feel sick.  It's a numb and sick feeling, but I'm not sure why I find it as disturbing as I do.  I think it might be the sexual assault savagery combined with torture savagery and helplessness of the victims that does my head in.  It's both disgusting and incomprehensibly cruel. It's unbelievable that they denied the embassy additional security, when more security was sought.  And it's beyond comprehension that they watched this man get tortured and dragged around Benghazi without doing anything to help. This was in 2012, so they'd already taken down Gaddafi in 2011 and Libya was presumably in a state of civil war. Why would you even have an embassy in the country under those circumstances? Regarding both stories, Daily Mail has left out the gruesome parts, although I think the public ought to know exactly what's happened.   I know I'd rather know, even if it is horrible and disturbing. ꕤ

'Is Obama the Worst President Ever?'

SOURCE http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/03/is-obama-the-worst-president-ever/ September 3, 2015 Is Obama the Worst President Ever? by Dave Lindorff Obama is on track to go down in history as one of the, or perhaps as the worst and most criminal presidents in US history. He started out, campaigning in 2008, as someone would would restore the rule of law in US international affairs and here at home after eight years of criminality during the Bush and Cheney administration, as saying he would end America’s wars and bring back an era of international cooperation and negotiation, and as saying that he would confront the dire threat of global climate change. On the basis of that promise, he won a dramatic election victory, raising hopes across the country and across many voting blocks. On that basis, he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize — the first time the award was given before anything had been done by the laureate being honored. And on the basis of that promise, people expected action on climate change. Instead, the president began backpedaling almost instantly. Instead of restoring the rule of law, he almost immediately announced that he would not permit his Justice Department to engage in any prosecutions of CIA, FBI, military of Bush/Cheney administration personnel for violations of international law or of US law. He introduced new secrecy rules, launched a record number of prosecutions of government whistleblowers, including an international manhunt to arrest or kill NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden which included the forcing down of a presidential aircraft carrying the president of Bolivia, wrongly suspected of flying Snowden from Russia to that Latin American country, and a secret espionage indictment against Wikileaks founder Julien Assange, who has thus been trapped for years in the little UK embassy of Ecuador which has granted him asylum. And most egregiously, Barack Obama, sabotaged the first international meeting on climate change held in Denmark, and has ducked every opportunity to have the US lead on reaching an international agreement to seriously reduce global carbon emissions. During the three Congressional electoral cycles and his re-election campaign in 2012, Obama studiously avoided pressing on any of these key issues, and especially on climate change. His position: “all of the above”, for energy development, has seen the US move, not towards carbon emission reductions, but towards expanded production of gas, oil and even coal extraction, making the US the largest oil producer in the world, and a major provider of dirty coal to both US electric companies and large coal using countries abroad, including China. Now we have this flimflam artist up in Alaska, talking about the crisis he has helped worsen, calling it an existential issue. And yet even as he speaks, the Shell Oil Company is towing a giant oil drilling rig up to the Arctic Ocean, thanks to an Obama administration permit, to begin drilling for oil in the shallow waters north of Alaska — drilling for yet more oil, that is, even as the world is facing a glut of the stuff, in a delicate region that would be devastated by a well blow-out, because ice would make containment an impossibility. Future generations of Americans will surely look back at President Obama as not just a con-man, but as someone who blew several trillion dollars on continued wars around the globe, as someone who terminally destroyed the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, instead of rescuing these documents as promised, and as the president who, when given the last real opportunity to reverse climate change, ducked the challenge and pandered to the corporations that selfishly wanted short-term gain over long-term survival for humanity and the biosphere. There are plenty of other criminal acts by this president to consider. On his watch, this first African-American president allowed an increased national police to become a fully-armed occupying army across the country. No American today is safe from abusive police who make up crimes and ignore the law at will, but paying a uniquely terrible price are African-Americans and other people of color, who once gave this president 90% of their votes or more, but who now are being gunned down with a grim regularity by mostly white cops who fire at the slightest provocation, even at unarmed kids. On his watch too, young children, fleeing US-caused gang violence in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and elsewhere in Latin America, have been sent back to their home countries illegally, or held in prisons in this country in violation of direct court orders. He also ordered his Justice Department not to prosecute the criminal bankers who willfully destroyed the US and the global economy to profit themselves and their institutions. This president, let’s be clear, has not just been incompetent and gutless. He has been a slick political fraud and both a common and a Constitutional criminal. In a just nation of engaged citizens, Obama would already have been impeached for any number of serious crimes, beginning with the failure to prosecute known war criminals of the Bush/Cheney administration, including the president and vice-president themselves. That’s not going to happen, because this is not a just nation of engaged citizens. But there will be a reckoning. History will judge this president harshly, as it has judged criminal leaders of the past, from Rome’s Nero to Italy’s Mussolini or Uganda’s Idi Amin. It may strike some as hyperbole to put President Obama in league with such universally acknowledged monsters as these, but when human beings begin dying by the millions because of climate-change caused famines, floods, droughts and international armed conflicts we will surely look back at the actions and inactions of this particular president, who had the opportunity to make a huge difference and chose not just to do nothing, but to make things worse, and will say his crimes perhaps exceeded theirs. Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). SOURCE http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/03/is-obama-the-worst-president-ever/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- What stood out for me: USA refuses to prosecute CIA, FBI, military [or] Bush/Cheney administration personnel for violating US or international law. Obama admin: = violated & continues to violate the Bill of Rights and the Constitution Obama admin: allowed militarised police to become a fully-armed occupying army across USA "No American today is safe from abusive police who make up crimes and ignore the law at will" Obama admin: introduced new secrecy rules Obama admin: launched a record number of prosecutions of whistleblowers Obama admin: engaged in international manhunt for whistleblower Edward Snowden Obama admin: forced down of a presidential aircraft carrying the president of Bolivia (wrongly suspected of flying Snowden from Russia to Bolivia} Obama admin: initiated a secret espionage indictment against WikiLeaks founder, journalist-publisher, Julian Assange (trapped for 5 years in the confines of UK embassy of Ecuador, which has granted him political asylum) Obama admin: =  ordered his Justice Department not to prosecute criminal bankers who destroyed the US & global economy for own profits Obama admin: = blew several trillion dollars on continued wars around the globe Obama admin: = pandered to corporations out for short-term gain over long-term effects on environment Obama admin: = expanded production of gas, oil and even coal extraction making the US the world's largest oil producer Thanks to Obama admin: USA = a major provider of dirty coal to both US electric companies + large coal using countries abroad, incl. China. Thanks to Obama admin: Shell Oil Company = towing a giant oil drilling rig up to the Arctic Ocean (Obama administration permit, to begin drilling for oil in the shallow waters north of Alaska) ꕤ ꕤ

Julian Assange | Statement 20 December, 2012 | Christmas

Julian Assange December 20th, 2012 Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_Gy3UaHBXo&feature=youtu.be ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- Statement https://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-Julian-Assange-after.html Statement by Julian Assange after Six Months in Ecuadorian Embassy Thursday December 20th, 19:00 GMT (updated 21:00 GMT) (Checked to delivery - published at 21:00 GMT) Good evening London. What a sight for sore eyes. People ask what gives me hope. Well, the answer is right here. Six months ago – 185 days ago – I entered this building. It has become my home, my office and my refuge. Thanks to the principled stance of the Ecuadorian government and the support of its people, I am safe in this embassy to speak to you. And every single day outside, for 185 days, people like you have watched over this embassy – come rain, hail and shine. Every single day. I came here in summer. It is winter now. I have been sustained by your solidarity and I’m grateful for the efforts of people all around the world supporting the work of WikiLeaks, supporting freedom of speech, freedom of the press, essential elements in any democracy. While my freedom is limited, at least I am still able to communicate this Christmas, unlike the 232 journalists who are in jail tonight. Unlike Gottfrid Svartholm in Sweden tonight. Unlike Jeremy Hammond in New York tonight. Unlike Nabeel Rajab in Bahrain tonight. And unlike Bradley Manning, who turned 25 this week, a young man who has maintained his dignity after spending more than 10 per cent of his life in jail, without trial, some of that time in a cage, naked and without his glasses. And unlike so many others whose plights are linked to my own. I salute these brave men and women. And I salute journalists and publications that have covered what continues to happen to these people, and to journalists who continue publishing the truth in face of persecution, prosecution and threat – who take journalism and publishing seriously. Because it is from the revelation of truth that all else follows. Our buildings can only be as tall as their bricks are strong. Our civilization is only as strong as its ideas are true. When our buildings are erected by the corrupt, when their cement is cut with dirt, when pristine steel is replaced by scrap – our buildings are not safe to live in. And when our media is corrupt, when our academics are timid, when our history is filled with half- truths and lies – our civilization will never be just. It will never reach to the sky. Our societies are intellectual shanty towns. Our beliefs about the world and each other have been created by the same system that has lied us into repeated wars that have killed millions. You can’t build a skyscraper out of plasticine. And you can’t build a just civilization out of ignorance and lies. We have to educate each other. We have to celebrate those who reveal the truth and denounce those who poison our ability to comprehend the world that we live in. The quality of our discourse is the limit of our civilization. But this generation has come to its feet and is revolutionizing the way we see the world. For the first time in history the people who are affected by history are its creators. And for other journalists and publications – your work speaks for itself, and so do your war crimes. I salute those who recognize the freedom of the press and the public’s right to know – recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, recognized in the First Amendment of the United States – we must recognize that these are in danger and need protection like never before. WikiLeaks is under a continuing Department of Justice investigation, and this fact has been recognized rightly by Ecuador and the governments of Latin America as one that materially endangers my life and my work. Asylum is not granted on a whim, but granted on facts. The U.S. investigation is referred to in testimony – under oath – in the U.S. courts, is admitted by the Department of Justice, and in the Washington Post just four days ago by the District Attorney of Virginia, as a fact. Its subpoenas are being litigated by our people in the U.S. courts. The Pentagon reissued its threats against me in September and claimed the very existence of WikiLeaks is an ongoing crime. My work will not be cowed. But while this immoral investigation continues, and while the Australian government will not defend the journalism and publishing of WikiLeaks, I must remain here. However, the door is open – and the door has always been open – for anyone who wishes to speak to me. Like you, I have not been charged with a crime. If you ever see spin that suggests otherwise, note this corruption of journalism and then go to justice4assange.com for the full facts. Tell the world the truth, and tell the world who lied to you. Despite the limitations, despite the extra-judicial banking blockade, which circles WikiLeaks like the Cuban embargo, despite an unprecedented criminal investigation and a campaign to damage and destroy my organization, 2012 has been a huge year. We have released nearly one million documents: Documents relating to the unfolding war in Syria. We have exposed the mass surveillance state in hundreds of documents from private intelligence companies. We have released information about the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere – the symbol of the corruption of the rule of law in the West, and beyond. We’ve won against the immoral blockade in the courts and in the European Parliament. After a two-year fight, contributions to WikiLeaks have gone from being blockaded and tax-deductible nowhere to being tax-deductible across the entirety of the European Union and the United States. And last week information revealed by WikiLeaks was vital – and cited in the judgment – in determining what really happened to El-Masri, an innocent European kidnapped and tortured by the CIA. Next year will be equally busy. WikiLeaks has already over a million documents being prepared to be released, documents that affect every country in the world. Every country in this world. And in Australia an unelected Senator will be replaced by one that is elected.  [Bob Carr, Labor Party Foreign Minister & Senate fill-in for Senator Mark Arbib (2008-2012), US Embassy secret informant - see below.  Note also:  "2007 bureaucrat spin doctors in Canberra were "outed" for editing Wikipedia entries critical of their bosses." lol] In 2013, we continue to stand up to bullies. The Ecuadorian government and the governments of Latin America have shown how co-operating through shared values can embolden governments to stand up to coercion and support self-determination. Their governments threaten no one, attack no one, send drones at no one. But together they stand strong and independent. The tired calls of Washington powerbrokers for economic sanctions against Ecuador, simply for defending my rights, are misguided and wrong. President Correa rightly said, "Ecuador’s principles are not for sale." We must unite together to defend the courageous people of Ecuador, to defend them against intervention in their economy and interference in their elections next year. The power of people speaking up and resisting together terrifies corrupt and undemocratic power. So much so that ordinary people here in the West are now the enemy of governments, an enemy to be watched, an enemy to be controlled and to be impoverished. True democracy is not the White House. True democracy is not Canberra. True democracy is the resistance of people, armed with the truth, against lies, from Tahrir to right here in London. Every day, ordinary people teach us that democracy is free speech and dissent. For once we, the people, stop speaking out and stop dissenting, once we are distracted or pacified, once we turn away from each other, we are no longer free. For true democracy is the sum – is the sum – of our resistance. If you don’t speak up – if you give up what is uniquely yours as a human being: if you surrender your consciousness, your independence, your sense of what is right and what is wrong, in other words – perhaps without knowing it, you become passive and controlled, unable to defend yourselves and those you love. People often ask, "What can I do?" The answer is not so difficult. Learn how the world works. Challenge the statements and intentions of those who seek to control us behind a facade of democracy and monarchy. Unite in common purpose and common principle to design, build, document, finance and defend. Learn. Challenge. Act. Now. SOURCE https://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-Julian-Assange-after.html ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- Bob Carr Labor Party Australia Govt Minister for Foreign Affairs 2012 (Mar) - 2013 (Sep) Also Australian Senate Senator NSW (unelected) "In April 2013, Fairfax journalist Philip Dorling identified Carr from a searchable database of declassified US State Department diplomatic cables as having criticised the Whitlam Government and provided information on internal Labor Party politics during discussions with the American consul-general in Sydney during the early 1970s."  [Wikipedia] Bob Carr: Washington's man in Australia April 8, 2013 Philip Dorling http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/bob-carr-washingtons-man-in-australia-20130408-2hgut.html Mark Arbib, aka CIA Agent 007 December 9, 2010    http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/mark-arbib-aka-cia-agent-007-20101208-18q50.html Arbib revealed as secret US source December 9, 2010 Philip Dorling http://www.smh.com.au/national/arbib-revealed-as-secret-us-source-20101208-18prg.html

ꕤ

USA - LAPD & Chicago PD - Militarised Police - Dirtbox (Fake Cell Phone Tower) Decade-long Dragnet Surveillance - Challenged by Civil Liberties Groups

LAPD Has Had “Stingray on Steroids” Surveillance Equipment for a Decade Back to News submit to reddit Wednesday, August 12, 2015 An older version of seldom-seen "dirtbox" Secret Stingray cellphone surveillance technology, deployed by police departments without warrants across the country, gets all the publicity. But the real deal is “Stingray on steroids” technology called “dirtbox” and The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) says cops in Los Angeles and Chicago have had it for a decade. Like Stingray, the device mimics cellphone towers to connect and monitor mobile devices. But dirtbox can monitor multiple signals at a time, breaking encryption as it goes, sweeping up data in a dragnet whose scale is unknown beyond its users. Devices like dirtbox were first developed for the military and intelligence agencies. Digital Research Technology, Inc. (DRT), purchased by giant defense contractor Boeing in 2008, started as Utica Systems in 1980, manufacturing devices for the “communications surveillance community.” Dirtboxes are popular among the U.S. Special Operations Command, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), FBI and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. And documents obtained by Edward Snowden indicate they are used extensively by U.S. spy agencies. The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) purchased the equipment in 2005 with a $260,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, according to CIR. Chicago purchased theirs with money gleaned from asset forfeiture cases. Both cities also deploy Stingrays. The accelerated militarization of local police since 9/11 has contributed to the widespread use of cell-site stimulator technology by local cops. An estimated 40 or 50 agencies use Stingrays, but there is no way to get an accurate count. Law enforcement agencies sign nondisclosure agreements with the manufacturer, Harris Corporation, which they are loathe to talk about, making court oversight problematic. It also doesn't help that the Obama administration has been advising local authorities to obscure use of the surveillance, which they have done. Prosecutors have dropped cases before releasing Stingray information. Dirtboxes have flown even more under the radar than Stingrays. CIR said its report on Chicago and Los Angeles was the first to reveal use of the technology by domestic law enforcement. LAPD refused to produce documents requested in February through the California Public Records Act. The Wall Street Journal wrote last December about the U.S. Marshals Service regularly flying dirtboxes around in Cessnas in at least five metropolitan areas. That kind of mass surveillance, with little discussion of warrants, raises Constitutional questions the courts are just beginning to address. The small boxes seem ideal for drone deployment. The Journal could only guess at what the Marshals are looking for—they do track fugitives—but said they also take target requests from the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ). Civil libertarians have been making noise in court over cell-site simulators. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed lawsuits seeking Stingray information in Anaheim and Sacramento, and the First Amendment Coalition filed a lawsuit in San Diego. SOURCE http://www.allgov.com/usa/ca/news/top-stories/lapd-has-had-stingray-on-steroids-surveillance-equipment-for-a-decade-150812?news=857184 ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT I've come across this before. Chicago Police sound really full-on from what little I've read. How deceitful, hypocritical and totalitarian is this? US claims to be the land of the 'free' and 'democratic', and look what's going on there.  Never mind 'Stingray on Steroids'; this is state surveillance / state control on steroids.  Totalitarian USA. No end to violations of civil liberties. I don't know if 'dirtboxes' are the same as fake phone towers. Looks like it's the same deal: A dirtbox (or DRT box) is a cell site simulator; a phone device mimicking a cell phone tower. The device is designed to create a signal strong enough within a short range so as to force dormant mobile phones to automatically switch over to it. [wikipedia] I've not read the rest of the Wikipedia entry; I've just captured that off the search summary. At least the civil liberties people are trying to challenge the practices (which have gone on for a decade). What's really shocking is the absence of disclosure and lack of court oversight, even though the US constitution is supposed to guarantee various civil liberties. ꕤ