PUTIN OBSESSED PRESS
|
TOKYO MASTER BANNER
MINISTRY OF TOKYO
|
July 31, 2014
WHITE HOUSE CONTROL OF MEDIA
Ted Rall's Site
Fired journalist:
... Read rest @ Rall's blog ...
http://rall.com/tag/cia
-------------------------------------------
So much for freedom of press and freedom of speech.
Welcome to 'Democracy', Ukraine.
RE- KABUL CIA CHIEF
Fired journalist:
Until last week I was working this story for Pando Daily, where I was a staff writer and cartoonist. We intended to publish the name — not to endanger him (which in any case would not have been possible since Langley had yanked him off his post), but to take a stand for adversarial media.
Journalists ought to publish news wherever they find it, whatever it is, damn the consequences. Credible media organizations don’t protect government secrets. They don’t obey spy agencies. Real journalists don’t cooperate with government — any government, any time, for any reason. My editor and I believed that, by demonstrating a little fearlessness, we might inspire other media outfits to grow a pair and stop sucking up to the government.
There is no longer a “we.” Pando fired me over the weekend, along with the investigative journalist David Sirota.
... Read rest @ Rall's blog ...
http://rall.com/tag/cia
-------------------------------------------
So much for freedom of press and freedom of speech.
Welcome to 'Democracy', Ukraine.
COUNTERPUNCH: MEDIA IGNORES CIA IN UKRAINE
Counterpunch Article Extracts July 30, 2014 A few days back the Economist published an essay which dismissed the idea of fascists in Kiev as an illusory product of Russian propaganda. [US-NATO EXPANSION INTO UKRAINE] Karl Rove aptly crystallized the prevailing mindset:
Note: this is not complete article - go to article link above to view entirety.
|
So what would be the chances of CIA not being involved?
That leopard ain't changing its spots.
This is only portions of the article. Link to it - here - if interested.
INDEPENDENT UK - Alleged secret German-Russian 'land for gas' negotiations
Independent Article
Independent claims they can reveal Merkel and Putin had been working on a secret deal to 'broker a peaceful solution' and to end tensions over Ukraine.
Aim is twofold:
- Stabilise Ukraine borders; and
- Secure new energy agreement (gas) to lift Ukraine economy.
The deal supposedly hinges on:
- UN and international community recognising Crimean independence.
- Russia withdrawing financial aid to East Ukraine independence supporters.
- If I understand correctly, East Ukraine to receive some 'devolved' (delegated) powers.
- Ukraine agreeing not to join NATO.
- Russia agreeing not to 'block or interfere' with Ukraine's newly signed trade agreement with the EU.
- Russia offering a long-term Gazprom future gas supply agreement. Ukraine expected to run out of gas by winter, which would be 'ruin' economically and socially.
- Russia to compensate Ukraine with $1 billion financial package for loss of rent Ukraine would have received from Russia stationing its fleets at Crimean ports, to the independence vote in March.
The deal is supposedly still on the table and the only negotiation hitch holding things up is the MH17 investigation.
The deal disclosure sounds like garbage to me.
For starters, the Russians deny financing the East Ukraine independence supporters.
Cannot see how the Russians could 'block' or 'interfere' with an EU trade agreement, that broke US-controlled and IMF reamed Ukraine has signed up for.
The Gazprom deal doesn't sound right either. Ukraine hasn't paid their gas bill. From what I read elsewhere, they were told by the US not to. Russia cut off the supply. But all this gas drama is then playing into US hands. And let's not forget who has plenty of shale gas: US. And US is bent on selling Europe infrastructure and gas. So there's no way I believe there's a Gazprom gas deal being negotiated.
The billion dollar 'compensation' to non-paying gas customer, Ukraine, sounds laughable.
Look forward to seeing how this piece of news pans out. LOL
Che Guevara - Hasta la Victoria Siempre
Che Guevara
C H E G U E V A R A
(1928–1967)
Ernesto 'Che' Guevara Born Argentina ... Basque and Irish descent. Marxist revolutionary, physician, author, guerilla leader, diplomat, and military theorist ...
|
'He was a revolutionary' was enough for me.
The detail wasn't important enough for me to remember -- it was all vague and foreign.
Today, focusing on the detail of the man's life, I'm really moved.
Not a lot moves me emotionally. But this did.
He wasn't an economist. He saw inequity. He wasn't a cosseted politician. He was an Independence Fighter. He wasn't a theorist. He was a Realist.
He put his life on the line, despite the odds.
He was instrumental in training men who thwarted a $13.1 million US-sponsored CIA invasion of Cuba (see also Cuban oil refineries US-controlled corporations: Shell, Esso and Standard Oil).
He could have chosen an easy path in life, but he died in pursuit of higher aims for his people.
Che Guevara was Dr. Ernesto Guevara, Independence Fighter; not some wayward stirrer.
History has proved that Che Guevara did not live, or die, in vain.
C O U R A G E
C H E G U E V A R A
(1928–1967)
IMT - Trotskyism
Alan Woods is a 'political theorist'.
Curious about him because he got a mention in an economics article relating to Venezuela.
Described as 'one of the leading members of 'International Marxist Tendencies' (IMT).
2009 dispute IMT leadership and leaderships of it's groups in:
In 2010 these (or portions) broke with IMT and established new international body, 'Corriente Marxista Revolucionaria':
Thereafter break aways form 'Towards a New International Tendency' in:
Sounds like keeping everyone happy and united ain't easy.
Not really sure what this is all about. Suppose it is some kind of interest/lobby group of supporters of 'orthodox Trotskyism'.
What is 'Trotskyism'?
Marxist theory:
I'm getting lost now. Don't know enough to grasp this stuff.
Worldwide anything doesn't seem a realistic goal.
Also, nothing is 'permanent'. All empires crumble.
Really surprised to see Iran get a mention.
I don't associate the Middle East with socialism, although Latin America and socialism compute because of all those cool pics of Che Guevara. LOL
Wondering what happens to revolutionaries when they attain their goals and no longer have the fun of the chase.
Are they content? Or is there always some other chase to be had?
Is everyone chasing their own idea of nirvana?
Curious about him because he got a mention in an economics article relating to Venezuela.
Described as 'one of the leading members of 'International Marxist Tendencies' (IMT).
Wikipedia:
So that is:The International Marxist Tendency adheres to orthodox Trotskyism, emphasising the education of cadres of workers and youth.
The IMT manifesto makes demands such as "the end to privatisation and the abandonment of market economics", "the nationalisation of privatised companies without compensation" and "the reintroduction of the state monopoly of foreign trade".The IMT has spread to parts of Latin America, where it now has groups in Venezuela, Peru, Argentina, Mexico, Bolivia, Brazil and El Salvador. At the end of 2002 it promoted the launching of the solidarity campaign at Hands Off Venezuela, which is now active in 30 countries and has had resolutions passed within the trade union movements in Britain, Canada, Italy and other countries.
- education and training of labour force.
- end to privatisation.
- abandonment of 'market economics' - supply and demand market / prices determined in free price system (contrast fixed price system - govt set price).
- nationalisation of privatised companies without compensation.
- reintroduction of state monopoly of foreign trade.
2009 dispute IMT leadership and leaderships of it's groups in:
- Spain
- Venezuela
- Mexico
In 2010 these (or portions) broke with IMT and established new international body, 'Corriente Marxista Revolucionaria':
- Spain
- Venezuela
- Mexico (part)
- Columbia
Thereafter break aways form 'Towards a New International Tendency' in:
- Sweden
- Poland
- Britain
Sounds like keeping everyone happy and united ain't easy.
Not really sure what this is all about. Suppose it is some kind of interest/lobby group of supporters of 'orthodox Trotskyism'.
What is 'Trotskyism'?
Marxist theory:
Trotskyism is the theory of Marxism as advocated by Leon Trotsky. Trotsky identified as an orthodox Marxist and Bolshevik-Leninist, and supported founding a vanguard party of the working-class, proletarian internationalism, and a dictatorship of the proletariat based on working-class self-emancipation and mass democracy. Trotskyists are critical of Stalinism, as they oppose the idea of Socialism in One Country. ... [wikipedia]
So they don't just want socialism in one nation; it's a worldwide effort?
International revolution
According to classical Marxism, revolution in peasant-based countries, such as Russia, prepares the ground ultimately only for a development of capitalism since the liberated peasants become small owners, producers and traders which leads to the growth of commodity markets, from which a new capitalist class emerges. Only fully developed capitalist conditions prepare the basis for socialism.
Trotsky agreed that a new socialist state and economy in a country like Russia would not be able to hold out against the pressures of a hostile capitalist world, as well as the internal pressures of its backward economy. The revolution, Trotsky argued, must quickly spread to capitalist countries, bringing about a socialist revolution which must spread worldwide. In this way the revolution is "permanent", moving out of necessity first, from the bourgeois revolution to the workers’ revolution, and from there uninterruptedly to European and worldwide revolutions.
I'm getting lost now. Don't know enough to grasp this stuff.
Worldwide anything doesn't seem a realistic goal.
Also, nothing is 'permanent'. All empires crumble.
Really surprised to see Iran get a mention.
I don't associate the Middle East with socialism, although Latin America and socialism compute because of all those cool pics of Che Guevara. LOL
Wondering what happens to revolutionaries when they attain their goals and no longer have the fun of the chase.
Are they content? Or is there always some other chase to be had?
Is everyone chasing their own idea of nirvana?
WTO TALKS - INDIA STAYING STRONG
WTO talks down to the wire, India holds outfe Bureau | New Delhi | Published: Jul 31 2014, 01:08 IST
|
WTO (World Trade Organisation).
Re: adoption of free trade facilitation protocol for Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA).
WTO is negotiating an easing of 'customs and rules'.
WTO says 'public stockholdings' of food/grain must not exceed 10% of grains produced by a country.
But this is on the basis of a 1986-1988 stockholdings 'base price', and India is challenging on the basis of rising INFLATION.
Hey, I learnt about inflation.
So the WTO 10% (dollar?) figure doesn't take into account rising inflation and India is like a trade union for food/grain reserves, asking for the reserve to be brought up in step with inflation?
Fair call, India.
India points out that there's a potential $1 TRILLION to the world economy coffers. Go India!
India standing firm: insists no shift in its stand.
India wants TFA implemented ONLY as part of SINGLE UNDERTAKING ... INCLUDING the PERMANENT SOLUTION ON FOOD SECURITY.
|
Deadline is on 31 July 2014. Support of two-thirds of member countries is required to implement the TFP.
India suggested a postponement of adoption of TFP and outlined steps towards resolution by a date in December.
*Note: there is a couple of other issues at stake. Bali Package (a big one) ... and LDC.
Bali Package is yet another trade agreement 'to lower trade barriers'.
LDC issues relate to Least Developed Country ... it's a United Nations designation of a country (I think) on the basis of:
lowest indicators of socio-economic development, with the lowest Human Development Index ratings of all countries in the world. [wikipedia]
So there is some formula the UN apply for rankings of countries on socio-economic development.
Formula: (1) Poverty assessment (2) Human Resource assessment (ie the labour force) (3) Economic Vulnerability ... eg. are exports stable etc.
Gee, sounds like estimating the quality of cattle.
All this stuff is worked out by economists and I guess it affects the trade deals that countries are party to and, I think, the concessions that countries may receive.
As I'm new to looking at politics and economics, this information is best double-checked. LOL.
This is just my take at the moment.
Stand firm India ... world economy wants those trillions.
PS ... Love how John Kerry wants India's opposition to 'wither away'. Bet he does. LOL.
PS ... Love how John Kerry wants India's opposition to 'wither away'. Bet he does. LOL.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)