TWITTER - Nothing changes in politics ...

TWITTER

Twitter find.

Thought this was rather funny.

David Cameron - Romanticising WWI

First World War: Small nations cannot be 'snuffed out' by imperial powers, says David Cameron David Cameron urges families to remember Britain was fighting to defend 'important principle' of Belgian neutrality 9:39AM BST 04 Aug 2014 Britons should remember that soldiers in the First World War rallied behind the principle that small nations cannot be “snuffed out” by imperial powers, David Cameron has said. ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-one/11009937/First-World-War-Small-nations-cannot-be-snuffed-out-by-imperial-powers-says-David-Cameron.html

Cameron's full of it.

Nobody went to war merely for Belgian neutrality.

WWI was an imperialist war. 

Meanwhile ... all of Europe is being snuffed out by today's corporate imperialists.

Found this cool site: 

Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (with introduction by Doug Lorimer)

Looks like a good read.

Not sure how much I'll take in tho.  LOL.

GAZA - GARNIER USA

TWITTER SOURCE - HERE.

SOLDIERS MARCH | WWI LONDON DEATH MARCH

❌ G O O G L E SUCKS ❌ SOLDIERS MARCH DEATH MARCH ❌ Outrageous Censorship GOOGLE SUCKS ❌ Marching soldiers & fields of tombstones GIF with an implied anti-war message blocked by Google. From recollection, it neat rows of WWI tombstones, combined with old WWI photos of soldiers marching in London, over-layed by another person in present-day London street scenes. It was quite haunting and the GIF conveyed a powerful message, which Google has blocked, despite copyright exceptions readily being applicable to the images contained therein. Perhaps copyright disclaimer notices need to be plastered all over the page, as opposed to on the blog main page? Google really needs to review its policy on blocking images. The pathetic individual who lodged what must have been a complaint to censorship-obliging Google, is trying hard to disown the fact that war is DEATH. G O O G L E SUCKS ❌ It's enough to make a merely annoyed (rather than vehemently anti-war) person want to plaster War is Death messages all over the internet,  just to upset the boot-licking militarist c*$#&$!s suppressing what amounts to:   freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and freedom of information.  ;) ꕤ

Ron Paul - Why won't Obama leave Ukraine alone?

Why Won’t Obama Leave Ukraine Alone? “AMERICA ESCALATES WHILE IT DEMANDS RUSSIA DE-ESCALATE” By Ron Paul President Barack Obama announced last week that he was imposing yet another round of sanctions on Russia, this time targeting financial, arms, and energy sectors. The European Union, as it has done each time, quickly followed suit. These sanctions will not produce the results Washington demands, but they will hurt the economies of the U.S. and EU, as well as Russia. These sanctions are, according to the Obama administration, punishment for what it claims is Russia’s role in the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, and for what the president claims is Russia’s continued arming of separatists in eastern Ukraine. Neither of these reasons makes much sense because neither case has been proven. The administration began blaming Russia for the downing of the plane just hours after the crash, before an investigation had even begun. The administration claimed it had evidence of Russia’s involvement but refused to show it. Later, the Obama administration arranged a briefing by “senior intelligence officials” who told the media that “we don’t know a name, we don’t know a rank and we’re not even 100 percent sure of a nationality,” of who brought down the aircraft. So Obama then claimed Russian culpability because Russia’s “support” for the separatists in east Ukraine “created the conditions” for the shoot-down of the aircraft. That is a dangerous measure of culpability considering U.S. support for separatist groups in Syria and elsewhere. Similarly, the U.S. government claimed that Russia is providing weapons, including heavy weapons, to the rebels in Ukraine and shooting across the border into Ukrainian territory. It may be true, but again the U.S. refuses to provide any evidence and the Russian government denies the charge. It’s like Iraq’s WMDs all over again. ... even as the U.S. demands that the Russians de-escalate, the United States is busy escalating! In June, Washington sent a team of military advisors to help Ukraine fight the separatists in the eastern part of the country. Such teams of “advisors” often include special forces and are usually a slippery slope to direct U.S. military involvement. On Friday, President Obama requested Congressional approval to send U.S. troops into Ukraine to train and equip its national guard. This even though in March, the president promised no U.S. boots on the ground in Ukraine. The deployment will be funded with $19 million from a fund designated to fight global terrorism, signaling that the U.S. considers the secessionists in Ukraine to be “terrorists.” Are U.S. drone strikes against these “terrorists” and the “associated forces” who support them that far off? The U.S. has already provided the Ukrainian military with $23 million for defense security, $5 million in body armor, $8 million to help secure Ukraine’s borders, several hundred thousand ready-to-eat meals as well as an array of communications equipment. Congress is urging the president to send lethal military aid and the administration is reportedly considering sending real-time intelligence to help target rebel positions. But let’s not forget that this whole crisis started with the U.S.-sponsored coup against Ukraine’s elected president back in February. The U.S. escalates while it demands that Russia de-escalate. How about all sides de-escalate? Even when the goals are clear, sanctions have a lousy track record. Sanctions are acts of war. These sanctions will most definitely have a negative effect on the U.S. economy as well as the Russian economy. Why is “winning” Ukraine so important to Washington? Why are they risking a major war with Russia to deny people in Ukraine the right to self-determination? Let’s just leave Ukraine alone! Ron Paul is a former U.S. Congressman from Texas and the leader of the pro-liberty, pro-free market movement in the United States. His weekly column – reprinted with permission – can be found here. SOURCED - FIT NEWS - here. RON PAUL @ here.

COMMENT

Why is pretty obvious:

Obama's got an eye on prospective:

• Corporate enrichment:

• rape of Ukraine; and
• rape of Russia's energy markets in Europe.

• Fat cat buddy enrichment.

• European market for US infrastructure, gas, etc.

• Strategic military advantage.

• Another piece of Europe under the US thumb.

Ukraine's a pawn as well as prey ... but the big game prey is Europe ... Obama and co want to carve it up.

JIMMY CARTER ON PALESTINE

Title: Jimmy Carter unveils truth about Israel

180 UKRAINE SOLDIERS GOING HOME

Some 180 out of 438 military who fled to Russia return to Ukraine August 04, 15:15 More than 400 Ukrainian servicemen ask for asylum in Russia GUKOVO (Rostov region), August 04. /ITAR-TASS/. More than 180 of 438 Ukrainian servicemen crossing into Russia’s Rostov region overnight to Monday are heading back home, a Russian Federal Security Service official said. “The FSB border department for the Rostov region has organized the transfer of Ukrainian military who decided to return home,” its spokesman Vassily Malayev said. The servicemen are heading home on buses and armored vehicles. The rest of the group are still staying in Russia. ... FULL STORY @ SOURCE SOURCE - ITAR-TASS - HERE.

Surprised these guys want to go back.  I wouldn't be game.

I'd be hanging with the ones in Russia, I reckon.