LIBYA - DUELLING EMBASSIES IN MALTA

Monday, December 29, 2014, 11:39 Libyans hold protest outside Castille A small group of Libyan men this morning held a brief protest outside the Auberge de Castille in Valletta. [MALTA] The group, which supports the government installed in Tripoli, protested over the Maltese government's failure to recognise the Charge' d'Affairs operating from the embassy in Attard. [TRIPOLI GOVT = LIBYA DAWN = MISRATA = ATTARD, MALTA.] The Charge' d'Affairs supports the Tripoli government, which is based around Libya Dawn, a militant group from Misrata. Another charge' d'affairs, nominated by the recognised Libyan government - now based in Tobruk - is reportedly using consular offices in Ta' Xbiex. During the protest those who took part handed in a letter addressed to Prime Minister Joseph Muscat. They said they were surprised and hurt that the Maltese government had accepted an envoy of the 'illegal' Libyan Parliament as charge' d'Affairs of Libya. They insisted that this parliament had not achieved the 18% vote participation in the elections and lacked legal status in terms of the law, as confirmed by the Libyan Constitutional Court. [Tobruk] Those taking part in the protest carried placards reading: 'Respecting Libyan constitutional court sentence is respecting democratic rules and law.' Link:  http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20141229/local/libyans-hold-protest-outside-castille.549981 OMG! Trying to get to grips with what's going on in these articles about Libya's embassies (I've read more than one) is doing my head in -- big time.  Intended to give up on trying to figure it out, but I can't not figure it out or I won't know what's going for next time. Made a mistake earlier.  Saw Castille and took it to be in Spain.  Couldn't quite figure why a letter was handed over to to the Maltese head of state (via the embassy), but I imagined it was to pass on and didn't question further.   Turns out Castille Valletta is in Malta.  Oops.  Might have to do some editing tomorrow.  So the article is saying that the 'internationally' recognised government hiding out in Tobruk is the government that didn't achieve sufficient votes (according to a Libyan Supreme Court decision), yet this government is accepted as a Libyan envoy by the Maltese government. Meanwhile, the Tripoli government (aka Libya Dawn, Mistata govt), composed of militants that were the anti-Gaddafi rebels (if I recall correctly), has appointed it's own charge' d'Affairs of Libya, operating from an embassy in Attard, Malta, which the Maltese government isn't recognising. ---------------------------------------- Further from another source: New head of the Libyan Embassy in Malta (and Charge d'Affairs of the Libyan internationally-recognised government (Tobruk), Al-Habib Al-Amin): Al-Habib Al-Amin, said: "I have also been asked to let you know that the man currently occupying the Embassy, Mr Misurati is doing so illegally as it is Mr Al-Habib Al-Amin [who is] the legal representative of the legitimate  government." At Libyan embassy in Attard [Malta] = Hussain Musrati (or Misurati) Libya's acting Charge d'Affaire. The acting Chargé d'Affaires at the Libya Embassy in Malta accused the Maltese government of interfering in Libyan affairs by accepting the appointment by the Thinni government of former culture minister Habib Al-Amin as Libya's ambassador to Malta. The Thinni government was illegal because of the 6 November decision by the Supreme Court which nullified the House of Representatives and therefore all its decisions were illegal, Hussin Musrati said. He has been acting Chargé for since 20 November. He claimed that Malta is supporting Mr Al-Amin who was appointed by the Libyan Parliament which has now been dissolved. In doing so, Mr Misrati said, Malta is not respecting the verdict of the Libyan Constitutional Court and this has created a serious precedent. Speaking at a press conference this morning, Mr Musrati said that the Supreme Court's ruling had to be accepted. Although Habib Al-Amin had not taken up the post - he has been in Tunisia where a close member of his family was reported to have been having an operation - Mr Musrati said that he had managed to take over the embassy's bank accounts and vehicles. This was theft, he said, and a complaint had been lodged with the Maltese police.  [Habib Al-Amin has Libya embassy bank accounts & vehicles *illegally* given Supreme Court ruling.] Mr Misrati further attacked Bank of Valletta which, he claimed, has allowed unauthorised persons to take control over the embassy's bank accounts. A court action will be lodged against the bank. Mr Musrati said that Omar Al-Hassi's "National Salvation Government" was in contact with several European and African states and would be recognised by them shortly as Libya's legitimate government.  The Salvation Government was currently in control of the area from Sidra Port on the east to the border of Tunisia and from the coastline in Tripoli all the way to the south. It was also in control of airport and military bases, he said. The Central Bank of Libya was also working with Hassi's government, he said. Saddek Elkaber, sacked as the Central Bank's governor by the HoR but still recognised by the Hassi administration, is now largely based in Malta.  http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2014-12-20/local-news/Libyan-claims-to-be-the-real-representative-of-the-real-Libyan-government-6736127653 What's the problem here?   Omar Al-Hassi / Tripoli (Mistrata, Libya Dawn) government has the territory and has the Central Bank, as well as recognition of European states and African states - as well as a Libya Supreme Court ruling that the Tobruk 'government' cannot make up a government, so where exactly the issue?   The Tripoli / Mistrata government sounds legit, so what right has Malta -- or anyone else -- to choose a government for Libya? ....................................................... On second thoughts, I'm wondering if I've got it straight after all.  Need to double-check the Central Bank detail.  Might have to return to this because I need to confirm who the National Salvation Government is and check on that al-Hassi guy's details.  Picked him up on a translated French Wiki, but there wasn't anything much there.   Don't have time for this right now.  Another crap, incomplete post.  LOL

Walter Lippmann

WALTER LIPPMANN Walter Lippmann b.1889-d.1974 Journalist, a media critic, amateur philosopher WWI - Capitan US army Served intelligence division of American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), France Spin-doctor / adviser to President Woodrow Wilson In terms of censorship, Lippmann was not an absolute defender of the free speech doctrine; although he considered that there were dangers of suppression and cautioned against permitting censorship by a censor who was not aware of those dangers or tolerant of free speech. Coined phrase  "cold war" (1947 book of that title).  Every time we hear that expression (and we hear it quite a lot now that the neo-cons are stirring up aggression against Russia), we can think of dear old proto neo-con, Walter Lippmann. Coined term:  "stereotype". News and truth were not synonymous (analogous, corresponding) to Lippmann. Lippmann:  "function of news is to signalize an event, the function of truth is to bring to light the hidden facts, to set them in relation with each other, and make a picture of reality on which men can act." Journalist's 'truth' is subjective.  It is also limited to how the journalist constructs his reality. So news is: "imperfectly recorded". Lippman did not consider news/journalism as:  "an organ of direct democracy” Gather he did not see it as playing a role in democracy, but it's hard to say without reading further. Lippmann believed that voters: = ignorant re issues & policies. = lacked competence to participate in public life. = cared little for participating in political process. Book 'Public Opinion' 1922, Lippmann wrote that: "a "governing class" must rise to face the new challenges." and he considered it "possible to sanitize polluted information". Lippmann contended that:  functioning on an unconscious 'seeing through stereotypes' basis resulted in our being subjected to partial truths. Therefore, according to Lippmann, the idea of the public being equipped (or competent) to direct public affairs is a "false ideal." Political savvy of an average man = "theatre-goer walking into a play in middle of the third act and leaving before the last curtain." On mass culture, in his book Public Opinion (1922), Lippmann said: mass man functioned as a "bewildered herd" mass man must be governed by "a specialized class whose interests reach beyond the locality" elite class of intellectuals and experts were to be a machinery of knowledge purpose of the elite class of 'experts':  to circumvent the main defect of democracy:  the "omni-competent citizen" ideal. Lippmann's attitude, by the standards of the 1920s, was considered liberal. Liberal because it was, according to Wikipedia, "endorsing the continuation of civil society rather than populist fascism."  Hmmmm, so compared to some whacky extreme where you have no rights, this is a 'liberal' stand ... if you don't mind not knowing that you have no say. 1946 -  Lippmann leading public advocate of: need to respect a Soviet sphere of influence in Europe versus containment strategy OMG!  Nothing's changed:  neo-cons are pushing for NATO 'containment' to this day. "Manufacture of Consent" was one of Lippmann's catch phrases (used by Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman, in their book of same name). Similar views to Gabriel Almond, American political scientist (and WWII war office analyst of propaganda). Almond-Lippmann consensus on these points: Public opinion is volatile, shifting erratically in response to the most recent developments ... Public opinion is incoherent, lacking an organized or a consistent structure ... Public opinion is irrelevant to the policy-making process. Political leaders ignore public opinion because most Americans can neither "understand nor influence the very events upon which their lives and happiness are known to depend." So that's Walter Lippmann.  Really detested him reading this. His only saving grace is that he wasn't on the 'containment' of Russia bandwagon. See Lippmann as the typical neo-con NGO, USG revolving door, spin doctor that tells us how to think today. ---------------------------------- Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Lippmann

Notes: Ukraine - Economy

UKRAINE ------------------------------- No Gold Gold reserves since govt overthrow have dwindled to almost zero. http://on.rt.com/cniueq ------------------------------- Russia Supports UKR Economy Link: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30278606 Russia supports UKR industry. But UKR trade to EU = raw materials & agricultural  products (subject to heavy EU quotas & tariffs). 2014 predicted fall in GDP @ 7% - if this decline continues, the Ukrainian state will face collapse. [BBC]  Western media & policy worlds have ignored or misrepresented key aspects of the Ukrainian-Russian economic relationship. [BBC] Ukraine Cheap Russian gas & lenient payment terms = Russia has been subsidising UKR economy @ BILLIONS yearly. [BBC] Russia subsidy of Ukraine economy = many times total of Western aid during this period. [BBC] 1) By ignoring Russia's subsidy of UKR economy in the billions, pundits & media avoided addressing ... 2) ... if Western countries would pay billions to take UKR into Western sphere of influence. [BBC] Russia supports UKR manufacturing sector & remains Ukraine's largest partner. Trade 2013 exceeding that with WHOLE of EU. [BBC] Ukraine Over 3 million UKR working in Russia & sending money to home to family - a vital contribution to economies of several UKR regions. All over the EU, right-wing parties are gathering strength - developments are driven above all by hostility to immigration. [BBC] In such case, the West is hardly in a position to integrate Ukraine's workforce & economy into the EU economy. ------------------------------- Uranium & Coal Australia's Tony Abbott's doing deals with fascist US puppet govt. - Uranium & coal. UKRAINE's Western 'support' always comes down to this: Western corporations making money. ------------------------------- Leaked Proposed Ukraine Budget: UKRAINE no more free food for children in school or for patients in hospitals [sovereignman] UKRAINE healthcare will no longer be completely state-funded [sovereignman] UKRAINE  government is also proposing to drastically reduce pension benefits [sovereignman] UKRAINE  Women will have to work 10 more years in order to qualify for a pension [sovereignman] UKRAINE  Men will have to work an additional 5 more years in order to qualify for a pension [sovereignman] UKRAINE proposed FREEZE pension benefits (ie. no longer adjusting them to the rampant inflation) [sovereignman]. UKRAINE  stripping other public services; they’ve proposed slashing the number of judges, prosecutors &  police [sovereignman] UKRAINE  proposed reducing the number of members of parliament from 450 to 150 [sovereignman] http://www.sovereignman.com/trends/leaked-document-ukraines-government-to-eliminate-everything-15717/ Ukraine IMF disbursements program buys UKR limited time. Significant risks of UKR defaulting. Poor outlook. [StreetInsider] COMMENT Above are just some notes on the Ukraine economy. It's just what grabbed my interest at the time, rather than a complete overview.

Support: Jeremy Hammond

FREE JEREMY HAMMOND Support:  https://freejeremy.net/take-action/five-easy-actions/ Jeremy Hammond's an American hactivist, currently serving a 10-year prison term. Latest (Christmas 2014) photos of Jeremy Hammond:  here. The prison garb is rather austere, so I thought I'd brighten things up. Anyone interested in supporting Jeremy Hammond may do so by making a donation, sending a book, writing to him (or other prisoners), or perhaps by supporting a campaign, as per details on his support site:  here.

VIDEO - The Fugs - 'CIA MAN'

THE FUGS 'CIA MAN' Source:  YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW9cCWm53H4 USA - The Fugs band formed in NYC in mid-1963 Mentioned in the Doors FBI file - US govt link:  here.  "CIA Man" is featured in the movie 'Burn After Reading' by the Coen brothers. [Wikipedia]

VIDEO - Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media (1992)

(1992, IMDB)   Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dzufDdQ6uKg      Watched this to the intermission.  Way long for me.  It could have done with some savage editing, or an edited version for people who just want the distilled message. Have notes somewhere.  So disorganised I can't recall where.   Found them.  Didn't number the pages.  Day's later, I can't tell beginning from end. Anyway, here's what I got out of it: The 'elite media' (eg New York Times, Washington Post) is agenda setting media.  What they draw attention to and what they ignore becomes the agenda of the wider news services.  Large media outfits also shape history. Further, NYT was creator of history as it had a massive archive of carefully collated news information. Reed Irvine - insinuates that press agenda-setting is a left-wing conspiracy.   There's appearances of left-wing bias and opposition to power.  If I recall correctly, this is not a genuine left-leaning press or opposition to the establishment:  this press is firmly entrenched in the system and is part of the establishment. Press ignoring atrocities in Timor, the Panama invasion and the Gulf War (ie in step with the US agenda). Bush stating 'aggressors can't be rewarded' seemed to really annoy Chomsky, I think.   If I remember correctly, it may have been the hypocrisy of the US totalitarian war state that was at issue for Chomsky. Anyway, in Panama US actions were ignored (and wherever else around the world), while the actions of those the US war state decides to vilify become hugely overblown and over-reported. 'Official enemy' is the term used for those the US stands against. Column inches were compared and what the US government didn't want you to know about went massively under-reported.  Only a fraction of that topic would even make the news, unlike the overblown news about events concerning those the US was in opposition to. News stories were also censored -- example of a UK article -- information gouged before it hit the press in the US. Pol Pot's 1975-78 genocide in East Timor wasn't deemed newsworthy. Try again: Pol Pot in Cambodia was deemed massively newsworthy (I think the notes should read.  Hard to make them out!  Sorry about this mess.  Don't have time to check or fix).  Khmer Rouge in Cambodia became the 'official enemy' and their actions were blown grossly out of proportion (if I recall correctly). Reporting in respect of the 'official enemy' is subject to: exaggeration outrage falsification (photos) lies frudulence compared to US atrocities. There is an interplay: Government does. Press says. People think. Press is therefore complicit in genocide by suppressing facts. East Timor involved an Indonesian invasion that was ignored.  UN voted against the resolution to invade.   If I recall correctly, it was profitable supplying weapons.  West was selling arms to Indonesians for profit. * Indonesians killed a couple of Australian journalists December 7, 1975. UN response was condemnations and sanctions, but US clearly not allowing intervention. Meantime there was outrage over what was going on in Cambodia (for which the US was responsible). Very hard to make out my scrawl or the order this is in.    ............................................. Democratic process is what violence is to totalitarian society. It is a case of the Big Stick (totalitarian) versus the Big Lie (democracy). Some mention of 'rationalist libertarian socialism', but (days later) I've no idea what this is about.  Might have to watch the video again.  Social action animated by visions of future society | challenge authority and domination. Control/Coercion require justification - there is seldom a justification. Mention made of exceptions - eg war, parent/child relationships Democracy requires free access to information -- including publishing, education --  and press scrutiny. Discussion of origins of democracy:  17th C. revolution - Royalists versus others. Multiple issues:  incl. master/servant Time of radical publishing - disturbed all elites on both sides of the war.  Manufactured consent:  technique of control of special class. View that decision requires cool observation & that stupidity of average man is guided by myth (beliefs). INDOCTRINATION is the essence of democracy. Fear of people not submitting to civil control  -- people contained by manufactured consent / propaganda (versus the totalitarian model of domination by military force). The state becomes the myth-maker. Propaganda targets:  1. Political class - about 20% educated. 2. The 80% that follow orders and pay the costs. Mentioned sports as indoctrination.  So pleased about that because I detest sports and have never understood the point of following who kicks a ball etc. Walter Lippmann got a mention.  Cannot recall why.   Will link him, but its the early hours of the morning and I can't take the time to do more than that. Richard Niebuhr got a mention regarding the 'cool observer' and stupid average man who follows faith.  Not absolutely certain I have the right person.  Guessing I have.  No time to double-check.  Might come back to this over the next few days. (: Thought it was funny that Chomsky referred to NYT as a 'lapdog'.  While discussing how the government doesn't like to be exposed as the 'emperor with no clothes', it reminded me of why the powers that be have targeted WikiLeaks and publisher Julian Assange. Anyway, this is a scrambled and sketchy summary of the first portion of the documentary.   Even though this isn't chronological (I notice I've reversed the order), I'm going to leave it and shut down as soon as I can because I've got Christmas obligations.   Have noticed that if you really push yourself and not sleep normally for extended periods, it seems to have a depressant effect.  Or maybe that's just on me. Have a nice holiday everyone. [In a rush, excuse any typos]

UKRAINE - NATION SCREWED & ABOUT TO BE SOLD

UKRAINE Foreign Bankers Rape Ukraine by F. William Engdahl The US-picked Ukraine President, billionaire oligarch Petro Poroshenko called “snap” elections at the end of August for October 26. He did so to make sure genuine opposition to his regime of murderers, gangsters and in some cases outright Nazis would be able to push an unprepared genuine opposition out of the Verkhovna Rada or Parliament. Because the parliament had significant opposition parties to the US-engineered February 22 coup d’Etat, they had blocked many key pieces of legislation that the Western vultures were demanding, from changing key land ownership laws to privatization of precious state assets. By law, the old parliament would have sat until its five year term ended in October, 2017. That was clearly too long for State Department neo-con Ukraine puppet-mistress Victoria Nuland and her backers in Washington. EXTRACT ONLY - SOURCE:  http://www.voltairenet.org/article186276.html Anyone interested in Ukraine really ought to have a read of this article.  Some good background information on the newly appointed foreigners in government:  Natalie Jaresko, Aivaras Abromavicius and Alexander Kvitashvili. Personal highlights: "blatant foreign takeover that followed, like a Wall Street vulture fund raid on a distressed debtor country of the Third World" "the age of no nation state, of private capital taking over the world for sake of profit. Looting über alles is the motto." "nation of Ukraine is being put on the auction bloc to be privatized anyway, so it makes sense that the auctioneers at the US State Department head-hunt the ones to do the inside job of preparing that auction" "What [Natalie] Jaresko did not say was that she had been sent to Ukraine 22 years before as a member of the US State Department." "former CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf has already denied Washington had any hand in her appointment. Of course she would never lie." "According to the official US Government propaganda site, Radio Free Europe—the old CIA Cold War propaganda news service still exists, with its old name as kind of a sick joke—" Another good article to check out is: Is Soros Paying the Salaries of Ukraine’s Foreigners-Ministers? If he isn't, his Renaissance Foundation found them and faciliated their hiring Not only did the Renaissance Foundation take on the head hunting and hiring activities, sources in the region are saying that the foundation is being kind enough to also take on the salaries of the newly minted Ukrainian Ministers. It is noteworthy in this context that the ministers will be paid their wages not from the Ukrainian budget but from a certain Western foundation (according to some reports, George Soros’ Renaissance foundation). It gets better. Not only is George Soros acting as head hunter, hiring manager, and apparently paymaster to the new ministers, but Soros foundation grants also helped the new Public Health Minister get his degree. EXTRACTS ONLY - SOURCE:  here. Foreign Hires don't stop with the abovementioned trio.  Ukraine's government has also appointed these foreigners: Catherine Zghuladze from Georgia - job as deputy Interior Minister. [here] Ronald W. Glensor (retired assist. chief of Reno Police Dept Nevada) to train patrol & traffic police. [here] Thought it was cool how there's a strong link between Aivaras Abromavicius (newly minted Economy Minister) and Sweden, which is at the forefront of the neo-con lobbying for European integration: Aivaras Abromavicius based in Kyiv Estonia + US educ. East Capital (investment management co), partner EC = 6 owners HQ Stockholm East Capital manages abt 31 billion in total of 21 funds. Carl Bildt served as an advisor to the East Capital to 2006 East Capital  award for the best Russian fund during 2000-2010  with a total return of 1261 percent (USD) Yes, it's a tenuous link.  But it is nontheless a link that I find quite interesting.   And would you check out the return on the Russian fund.  If Ukraine is getting raped, the return figure looks like Russia's been g*ng b*nged.