Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah - Right to Repel Aggression

Al Masdar News Article Nasrallah: Resistance has right to repel any aggression By Leith Fadel on January 31, 2015 Middle East Beirut, SANA-The Israeli enemy must understand that resistance will no longer heed the “rules of engagement” as it is its ethical and legal right to repel any aggression, Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said. Nasrallah’s strident message came during a festival held Friday in honor of the resistance martyrs in Quneitra. “From now on, when a fighter from resistance is assassinated, the Israeli enemy will be held responsible and thus resistance will have the right to respond wherever and whenever it sees fit, and it whichever way it deems appropriate,” he added. Nasrallah indicated that resistance “had not had second thoughts about the necessity of retaliation, even if things went to extremes.” Nasrallah pointed to a state of confusion in Israel following the assassination of resistance fighters which, he said, prompted it to declare a state of emergency and to send threats via different countries. “The resistance operation happened in broad daylight and came at the height of the Israeli alert, leaving Israel at a loss as to what really happened,” he said. “Unlike Israel,” Nasrallah went on to say,” resistance claimed responsibility for the retaliatory operation soon after it was carried out.” Hezbollah’s Secretary-General considered that Israel is manipulating the situation in Syria in the worst possible way to suit its own interests, highlighting the support it provides for takfiri terrorist organizations. http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/nasrallah-resistance-right-repel-aggression/ COMMENT Sounds like Hezbollah are still angry and they intend to respond with aggression to any Israeli aggression.

Joint Mossad & CIA operation Killed Imad Mughniyeh

TIMES OF ISRAEL ARTICLE ‘Imad Mughniyeh killed in joint Mossad, CIA operation’ US operatives were on the ground, but the bomb was triggered in Tel Aviv, according to The Washington Post By Times of Israel staff January 31, 2015, 8:27 am Imad Mughniyeh, the senior Hezbollah commander who died in a bomb blast in Damascus on February 12, 2008, was reportedly assassinated in a joint Mossad-CIA operation that required approval from former president George W. Bush. The US built the bomb and had CIA spotters on the ground in the Syrian capital tailing Mughniyeh, but the explosion that killed him was triggered remotely from Israel, according to a report in The Washington Post late Friday. [Find that hard to believe.] “The way it was set up, the US could object and call it off, but it could not execute,” a former US intelligence official told the newspaper, adding that the CIA tested the bomb to ensure a contained blast that would cause no collateral damage. The US official said it was important for Israel to be the one to pull the trigger that killed Mughniyeh. “It was revenge,” he said. Mughniyeh, Hezbollah’s international operations chief, was implicated in some of the terror group’s major attacks including the 1992 bombing at the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires, and the 1994 bombing of the AMIA building in the Argentinian capital, in which 85 were killed. The senior Hezbollah official was also involved in the 1983 bombing at the US embassy in Beirut, the killing in 1994 of the CIA’s Lebanon chief William F. Buckly and the 1996 bombing at the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. In the years after the US invasion if Iraq, Mughniyeh was responsible for the arming and training of Iranian-backed Shiite militias in Iraq who carried out deadly attacks on American troops — all of which put him at the top of the US’s wanted list. The Bush administration regarded Hezbollah, and Mughniyeh, as a top threat to the US, according to the report. “There was an open license to find, fix and finish Mughniyeh and anybody affiliated with him,” a former US official who was stationed in Baghdad told The Washington Post. In a 2007 speech, Bush singled out Syria and Iran, Hezbollah’s backers and closest allies “These two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their territory to move in and out of Iraq. Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq,” he vowed. Nevertheless, the CIA had get to special approval from Bush to carry out the operation to kill Mughniyeh with the US attorney general, the director of national intelligence, the national security adviser and the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department all signing off on the plan. One former intelligence official said getting the authorization was a “rigorous and tedious” process. Intelligence officials had to show that he, and Hezbollah were a continuing threat to the US. “The decision was we had to have absolute confirmation that it was self-defense,” was former US intelligence official was quoted as saying. “All I can say is that as long as he drew breath, he was a threat, whether in Lebanon, Iraq or anywhere else. He was a very intelligent, dedicated, effective operator on the black side,” former US ambassador to Iraq, Ryan C. Crocker, told the paper. http://www.timesofisrael.com/imad-mughniyeh-killed-in-joint-mossad-cia-operation/ COMMENT Getting various US departments to sign off on an assassination still makes it an assassination by USA, which is an extra-judicial killing, I believe. Find it hard to believe that guy was responsible for everything they claim he was responsible for, like he's some Middle Eastern super-villain. Assassinated at the flick of a switch from Tel Aviv just doesn't sound credible.  Whoever flicked that switch was there, I reckon.

What went down in 1956?

What went down in 1956? Image Source:  Google News On the very day this article was hinting at the West 'reluctantly' arming Israel: July 4 – The first Lockheed U-2 spy plane flight over the Soviet Union. [Wikipedia] Image Source:  projectswordtoys.blogspot.com July 30, some weeks ahead of 'The Ten Commandments' (October 5th) première, pious USA claims 'god' and godliness as their own: President Dwight D. Eisenhower signs a Congress resolution, authorizing "In God we trust" as the national motto. Judging by the American stockpile of nuclear weapons, the motto should be:  "In Nukes We Trust."  While trusting in this nukes 'god', the Americans were nonetheless spying on 'the Reds' and innocently batting their eyes, feigning disinterest in the supply of weapons to Israel or promoting an arms race in the Middle East.  Source - Wikipedia Yet the 1955 figure for nuclear weapons stockpiles shows that the Americans were already running a crazy nukes arms race of their own  . . .  so what do you suppose might have been the real the likelihood of the Yanks and their Western allies shying away from a Middle Eastern arms race, particularly when they considered their ruling elite's interests were threatened, as in 1956? The Herald-Journal article above, just doesn't ring true when you consider the events of the day. C'mon, the West would have been arming Israel without any qualms (and whoever else may have served the interests of Western elites in the region), yet the West is portrayed as 'reluctant', while the scare of 'Red weapons' in Egypt (and the spectre of the 'official enemy') is raised as the focal point, taking the glare off the real agenda:  preservation of Western imperialist interests. The following is a cool list of 1956 events pulled (selectively) from the Wikipedia entry: January 1 – The Anglo-Egyptian Condominium ends in Sudan. Between 1899 & 1956 Egyptian-British rule, but in practice British rule. January 8 – Operation Auca: Five U.S. missionaries Nate Saint, Roger Youderian, Ed McCully, Jim Elliot and Pete Fleming are killed for trespassing by the Waodani of Ecuador shortly after making contact with them. January 16 – Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser vows to reconquer Palestine. February 11 – British spies Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean resurface in the Soviet Union after being missing for 5 years. CAMBRIDGE FIVE February 24 – Doris Day records her most famous song: Que Sera, Sera (Whatever Will Be, Will Be) February 25 – Nikita Khrushchev attacks the veneration of Joseph Stalin as a "cult of personality". May 8 – The constitutional union between Indonesia and the Netherlands is dissolved. June 5 – Elvis Presley performs "Hound Dog", on The Milton Berle Show, scandalizing the audience with his suggestive hip movements. June 23 – Gamal Abdel Nasser becomes the 2nd president of Egypt. July 4 – The first Lockheed U-2 spy plane flight over the Soviet Union. July 10 – The British House of Lords defeats the abolition of the death penalty. July 26 – Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalizes the Suez Canal sparking international condemnation. September 13 – The hard disk drive is invented by an IBM team led by Reynold B. Johnson. September 16 – Television broadcasting commences in Australia. September 25 – The submarine transatlantic telephone cable opens. October 5 – Cecil B. DeMille's epic film The Ten Commandments, starring Charlton Heston as Moses, is released in the United States. It will be in the top ten of the worldwide list of highest-grossing films of all time adjusted for inflation. October 17 - The world's first commercial nuclear power plant is opened at Calder Hall in England. October 22 – Suez Crisis: The United Kingdom, France, and Israel secretly meet in and make plans to invade Egypt. October 23 – Hungarian Revolution breaks out against the pro-Soviet government, originating as a student demonstration in Budapest. Hungary attempts to leave the Warsaw Pact. October 26 – Red Army troops invade Hungary. October 29 – Suez Crisis: Israel invades the Sinai Peninsula and pushes Egyptian forces back toward the Suez Canal. October 31 – Suez Crisis: The United Kingdom and France begin bombing Egypt to force the reopening of the Suez Canal. November 4 – 1956 Hungarian Revolution: More Soviet troops invade Hungary to crush a revolt that started on October 23. Thousands are killed, more are wounded, and nearly a quarter million leave the country. November 7 – Suez Crisis: The United Nations General Assembly [UNGA] adopts a resolution calling for the United Kingdom, France, and Israel to withdraw their troops from Arab lands immediately. November 13 – The United States Supreme Court declares illegal the state and municipal laws requiring segregated buses in Montgomery, Alabama, thus ending the Montgomery Bus Boycott. November 14 – Fighting ends in Hungary. November 18 – At the reception of the Polish embassy in Moscow Nikita Khrushchev uttered his famous phrase "We will bury you". November 22 – The 1956 Summer Olympics begin in Melbourne, Australia. Dun Dun Dun! Here's the BIG ONE.  About 3 weeks after the Herald-Journal article is published, we have this, surely anticipated, bombshell: July 26 – Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalizes the Suez Canal sparking international condemnation. [Wikipedia] Call me cynical, but I don't reckon this invasion of Egypt was a last minute surprise put upon an unprepared West. ....................................................................... Some lead-up to the Suez Crisis: Nasser's neutralist policies during the Cold War led to tense relations with Western powers, which withdrew funding for the planned Aswan Dam. Nasser's retaliatory move to nationalize the Suez Canal Company in 1956 was acclaimed within Egypt and the Arab world. Consequently the United Kingdom and France occupied the Suez Canal zone, while Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamal_Abdel_Nasser Initially, both the US and the USSR were interested in the development of the dam, but this occurred in the midst of the Cold War, as well as growing intra-Arab rivalries. In 1955 Nasser was trying to portray himself as the leader of Arab nationalism, in opposition to the traditional monarchies, especially Hashemite Iraq following its signing of the 1955 Baghdad Pact. At that time the US feared that communism would spread to the Middle East and saw Nasser as a natural leader of an anti-communist Arab league. The US and Britain offered to help finance construction of the high dam, with a loan of US$270 million, in return for Nasser's leadership in resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict. While opposed both to communism and imperialism, Nasser presented himself as a tactical neutralist, and sought to work with both the US and the USSR for Egyptian and Arab benefit.  After a particularly criticized raid by Israel against Egyptian forces in Gaza in 1955, Nasser realized that he could not legitimately portray himself as the leader of pan-Arab nationalism if he could not defend his country militarily against Israel. In addition to his development plans, he looked to quickly modernize his military, and turned first to the US. *ISRAEL -  Operation Black Arrow* US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and US President Dwight Eisenhower told Nasser that the US would supply him with weapons only if they were used for defensive purposes and accompanied by US military personnel for supervision and training. Nasser did not accept these conditions and then looked to the Soviet Union for support.  Although Dulles believed that Nasser was only bluffing and that the USSR would not aid Nasser, he was wrong—the USSR promised Nasser a quantity of arms in exchange for a deferred payment of Egyptian grain and cotton.  On 27 September 1955, Nasser announced an arms deal, with Czechoslovakia acting as a middleman for the Soviet support.  Instead of retaliating against Nasser for turning to the Soviets, Dulles sought to improve relations with him. This explains the later offer of December 1955, in which the US and UK pledged $56 and $14 million respectively towards the construction of the dam.   Though the Czech arms deal actually increased US willingness to invest in Aswan, the British cited the deal as a reason for withdrawing their funding. What angered Dulles much more was Nasser's recognition of communist China, which was in direct conflict with Dulles's policy of containment. There are several other reasons why the US decided to withdraw the offer of funding. Dulles believed that the Soviet Union would not fulfill its commitment to help the Egyptians. He was also irritated by Nasser's neutrality and attempts to play both sides of the Cold War. At the time, other western allies in the Middle East, including Turkey and Iraq, were irritated that Egypt, a persistently neutral country, was being offered so much aid. In June 1956 the Soviets offered Nasser $1.12 billion at 2% interest for the construction of the dam. On 19 July the US State Department announced that American financial assistance for the High Dam was "not feasible in present circumstances." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aswan_Dam So ... this is just a bit of interesting background to the 1956 Herald-Journal article.

VIDEO - A little less conversation (Remix)

Souce - YouTube A little less conversation (Remix)

‘Espionage Den'

‘Espionage Den' Westerners can see a Hollywood re-enactment of the early days of the hostage-taking, “Argo”, the wildly popular but very inaccurate docudrama, winner of 2012 Best Picture Oscar ... In addition to Canada’s cloak-and-dagger role during the siege, the visit is made especially piquant because of the “conspiracy” surrounding the Stephen Harper’s decision to cut all diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012. Harper’s personal crusade to demonize Iran reached a bizarre high/low point when Minister of Foreign Affairs John Baird announced the severing of relations with Iran in 2012 just hours before “Argo” premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival. “Life imitates art” takes on new meaning. The Tehran embassy had indeed been a ‘nest of spies’, as the Shah was the most reliable US ally in the Muslim world, along with Turkey’s Kemal Ataturk the only Muslim leader who recognized Israel, and it was only natural that the CIA made the US embassy in Tehran ‘mission control centre’ for all US espionage activity in the Muslim world. Officially, the US has since admitted that there were at least three bona fide CIA agents among the captives. The six diplomats rescued by Taylor were consular workers, so they probably were not CIA agents. No money changed hands as a result of the siege, and there were no American casualties, except for eight Marines who died when their helicopter crashed in the Iranian desert in Carter’s first bungled rescue attempt in April 1980. The 52 hostages were flown to Algeria January 20 1981, 20 minutes after Reagan concluded his inaugural address, the first move in what came to be known as the Iran-Contra affair. Reagan’s foreign policy team had secretly agreed to exchange arms-for-hostages with the Iranians, now at war with Iraq. Since 1979, the United States government has officially had no dealings with the Iranian government, and is represented in Iran by the United States Interests Section of the Embassy of Switzerland in Tehran. This is belied by the hostage crisis itself, as Reagan swore his oath of allegiance in 1980, resulting in their release, and by the subsequent Iran-Contra Affair, when Reagan authorized selling arms to Iran to fight Saddam Hussein (who of course also received US arms and much more to fight the Iranians), funneling the proceeds to the Nicaraguan contras in Reagan’s own personal jihad against the socialist Sandinista government. With reality this bizarre, who needs fiction? The visit to the embassy was bittersweet. Clearly Iranians are now of two minds about this time warp into their anguished past. The museum is generally closed, and visits require special arrangements for both foreigners and Iranians. Iranians uniformly want to restore relations with the US. Yes, in the siege, the US was reaping the fruits of decades of imperialist intrigues, notably its involvement in the overthrow of the Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 and the reinstalling of the Shah, who kowtowed to the US and Israel, and presided over a ruthless and unpopular dictatorship, turning Iranians against the US. At the same time, Carter, who lost the 1980 election to the trigger-happy Reagan primarily due to the hostage crisis, was America’s most liberal president, now revered as a humanitarian. Reagan’s foreign policies were far more militaristic, leading to Bush and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, hardly policies that were favorable to Iran. RANDOM EXTRACTS ARTICLE BY:   Eric Walberg SOURCE  http://www.eurasiareview.com/03012015-espionage-den-american-ghosts-tehran-oped/ COMMENT Really enjoyed this article.   These are only random extracts.  Full article is on link above.

Canada - Blasphemy

CANADA Why Is Blasphemy Still Illegal in Canada? January 20, 2015 By Shanifa Nasser Section 296 of the Criminal Code of Canada states: "Every one who publishes a blasphemous libel is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years." True, no one has been prosecuted under the law in more than 70 years; charges against the Canadian distributor of the Monty Python film Life of Brian in 1980, for example, were later dropped. But secular advocacy groups say it's plainly hypocritical for Canada to keep an anti-blasphemy law on the books when it accuses other countries of using similar laws to justify human rights abuses. The United Kingdom abolished its blasphemy law in 2008; the United States has never had one at the federal level. Meanwhile, Canada's law has expanded in application beyond Christianity to religion in general. Last month, the heads of Humanist Canada and the Centre for Inquiry (CFI), a national organization that promotes "skeptical, secular, rational, and humanistic inquiry," met with Ambassador Andrew Bennett of Canada's Office of Religious Freedom to note the inconsistency of the law with his office's policy of supporting religious freedom abroad. But Bennett's mandate doesn't include domestic issues. So the two groups, with the support of lawyers, are now taking their case to the Department of Justice. "There are certain parts of the world where apostasy will get your head removed. We don't have that issue here but why would we even have this on our books?" said Eric Thomas, president of Humanist Canada. [ ... ]  Lawyer Derek James From of the Canadian Constitution Foundation argues that while it's unlikely anyone would be charged with blasphemy in Canada, the very existence of the law is a violation of our freedom of expression. He says the law was considered dead in the UK, too, until it resurfaced in 1977. It's therefore not dead, but dormant, he says. Willoughby agrees. "If it is truly a dead and unused law, then let us bury it." EXTRACT ONLY - FULL @ SOURCE http://www.vice.com/read/blasphemy-in-canada-217 COMMENT What kind of demented government would even have an 'Office of Religious Freedom'? The guy from Canadian Constitution Foundation has a point about that ridiculous blasphemy law.  LINKS Canadian Constitution Foundation

UAE-Funded Canada to train Egyptian police

Canada to train Egyptian police #EgyptTurmoil As part of new agreement, Canada will be directly supporting the same ministry detaining Egyptian-Canadian journalist Mohammed Fahmy Tom Stevenson Monday 26 January 2015 18:58 GMT Last update: Friday 30 January 2015 1:00 GMT CAIRO - On 14 and 15 January, Canada's Foreign Minister John Baird visited Egypt with the intention of securing the release of imprisoned Al Jazeera journalist Mohammed Fahmy, a dual Canadian-Egyptian national. The minister's team was unsure its effort would be successful, but remained cautiously optimistic, Baird's officials told Canadian journalists in the days leading up to the trip. In the end, they were unsuccessful: Baird sat down with Egypt's Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry for talks he described as “fruitful”, but his planned meeting with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi was cancelled and Fahmy remains in jail. While in Cairo, however, the minister announced a set of new co-operation agreements between Canada and the Egyptian government, which Baird's officials told journalists were designed to “support stability and prosperity in Egypt”. The plans ranged from training for Egyptian diplomats to funding for local small-to-medium sized businesses, but one of the agreements stood out. With funding from the United Arab Emirates, Canada has agreed to send a team of Canadian police officers to Egypt to train their Egyptian counterparts, and to receive Egyptian police officers for training at the Canadian Police College in the capital, Ottawa. This “trilateral initiative to support the professionalization and skills development of the Egyptian police”, as Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development described the project, means that Canada will be directly supporting staff from Egypt's Interior Ministry, the same ministry that is currently responsible for detaining Fahmy. Adam Hodge, Baird's press secretary, told Middle East Eye this week that initiatives like the Canada-UAE-Egypt police collaboration programmes "will help to encourage stability, security and economic growth in the country". [Ignore the cheer squad] "Minister Baird’s most recent visit to Egypt allowed him to advance Canadian foreign policy interests and support social and economic development, while providing the opportunity to again raise consular issues, particularly concerning the journalist Mohamed Fahmy," Hodge said. [Ignore the cheer squad] Fahmy has been held for over a year, alongside Al Jazeera colleagues Peter Greste and Baher Mohamed. He and Greste were sentenced to seven years' imprisonment while Mohamed was sentenced to 10 years. The three will face retrial later this year. In a statement released while Baird was in Cairo, Fahmy criticised the Canadian government's approach to securing his release. “I do believe that Prime Minister [Stephen] Harper could do more to obtain my release if he were to directly intervene in our case,” Fahmy said. Baird finally met with Sisi at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday, where he “raised the topic [of Fahmy's detention] over dinner”, Canada's CTV reported.  [Placing considerable political pressure on Sisi?  LOL] Fahmy's family members had expressed hope that he might be included on the list of 584 prisoners expected to be pardoned on the four-year anniversary of Egypt's 25 January revolution. Those pardons have yet to be issued, however, and Fahmy remains behind bars. http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/canada-train-egyptian-police-1589938575 COMMENT Canadian politicians have to be the most brazenly disgusting of the whole bunch.  Completely shameless. Only dirtbags go to Davos, I've decided. Politicians don't care about journalists. Everything they do centres around the desires of corporate masters. UAE is certainly in the thick of things. The Sisi government must be a USA, Israeli, Saudi Arabian & UAE backed government. And Baird, he's selling his snake oil all over the Middle East.