Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
The reference to Jobs is due to the observation that he is social media campaign poster-boy, whenever anything goes down that requires image rehabilitation, so that was my humour and expression of cynicism.
Hey, let's swing open those borders to ... unidentified Middle Easterners with stolen passports ...
Note the use of Western intelligentsia indoctrination messaging & double-barrelled finger-wagging propaganda and indoctrination tags:
'racism'
'Islamophobia'
usually symptomatic of:
a) self-serving intelligentsia con-artistry; b) official immigration-shilling; c) unofficial immigration-shilling; d) other hidden agenda shilling; e) Marxist delusion; f) brainwashed stroke-seeking mimicking; g) other delusion (religious, spiritual etc);
all available in several flavours of stupid.
Son
Huffingon Post
Neo-Con Propagandist Campaign
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Daughter
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
************
consider immigration propaganda
v. informed choice
it's WAR
conquest & imperialreligion
Where did the tide flooding Europe come from?
CIA is behind the early training of what is now a multinational Islamist opposition force that's been trying to bring down the secular and independent Syrian Assad government, since 2011.
There's a number of articles below, discussing Syria and Western and other interference in the region, including the US backing jihadist terrorists under the Reagan administration of the 1980s, giving rise to al-Qaeda and, eventually, ISIS.
The US has sought regime change in Syria since 2006, which is well before the so-called 'civil war' staging began in Syria.
The serial destruction includes: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and the destruction of Yemen at the present, by Saudi Arabia, which has all contributed to the large-scale Middle Eastern and African (largely Muslim) population movement, encouraged, tolerated and enforced by US vassal, Germany, headed by Angela Merkel.
Other anti-Assad players include, the Gulf Arabs (particularly Qatar and Jordan), Turkey and the European Union. I'm pretty sure that Pakistan is also a Saudi pal. Israel, I can't make out. From what I've read, Syria and Iran are the official enemies of Israel, and I believe Israel is still officially at war with Syria.
Egypt is predominantly Sunni, but Egypt is opposed to ISIS, whom it attacked. However, USA reportedly failed to back Egypt's military operation (Feb. 2015):
02.19.155:25 AM ET U.S. Won’t Back Egypt’s Attacks on ISIS
Two longtime allies are attacking ISIS—and growing frustrated with one another. That’s good news for the so-called Islamic State.
The Obama administration was given multiple chances Wednesday to endorse a longtime ally’s airstrikes on America’s biggest enemy at the moment, the so-called Islamic State. Over and over again, Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS. It’s another sign of the growing strain between the United States and Egypt, once one of its closest friends in the Middle East.
This shouldn’t be a complete surprise; Cairo, after all, didn’t tell Washington about its strikes on the ISIS hotbed of Derna, Libya. Still, Wednesday's disconnect was jarring. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest passed on a reporter’s question about an endorsement of Egypt’s growing campaign against ISIS. So did State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.
“We are neither condemning nor condoning” the Egyptian strikes, is all one U.S. official would tell The Daily Beast.
The American empire and its NATO war machine are central to all this murky Middle Eastern activity, I believe, as it is logical that this be the case. On quick check, it appears that NATO is a background force.
As Western powers conduct covert aggression campaigns in the Middle East through intelligence, mercenary and other proxy forces, it appears NATO itself is dormant.
Steps for NATO open warfare Western involvement
1. Article 4
"Article 4 consultation, which would convene the ambassadors of the 28 nations, who are in permanent session in Brussels, to discuss the situation and decide a course of action." [Foreign Policy - link below]
Apparently, Article 4 consultation has already taken place on a previous occasion. In 2014 an article 4 consultation was called under pretext of Islamic State 'attacks' in Turkey.
Following 24/11/2015 Turkish projectile attack and downing of Russian military jet conducting airstrikes against Islamist terrorists in northern Syria, which had reportedly veered into bordering Turkish airspace for a mere 17 seconds, Turkey called a meeting with Turkey's Western / NATO co-conspirators, however it is reported that the meeting was not an Article 4 consultation:
NATO Solidarity with Turkey & ISIS
"Nato expressed solidarity with Turkey after a special meeting of the North Atlantic Council. However, Jens Stoltenberg, Nato secretary-general, urged Moscow and Ankara to exercise calm and avoid escalation.
Turkey’s request for a Nato discussion on Tuesday did not formally invoke an Article 4 emergency meeting, a trigger to consider a threat to its territorial integrity or stability.
Western diplomats said it was too early to say whether the incident would bring an end to greater Russian co-operation in the fight against Isis. But capitals are bracing for Moscow to retaliate, either through economic measures or by more attacks on Turkish-allied opposition groups in Syria."
The aim of consultations under Article 4 is to push for an Article 5 definition of events (any events, including false flag events) as an 'attack' under Article 5, thus 'legitimising' European and North American 'self-defence' measures -- ie, basically 'legitimising' American and allied war on the target:
Article 5
"Article 5 of its founding treaty:
“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked.”
It is worth noting that the only country to ever activate Article 5 was the United States after the 9/11 attacks in 2001."
Source: Foreign Policy Article - Propaganda for War
Turkish, US-NATO / European Union scumbags are defending Islamic terrorists in Syria, because those terrorists are their proxies, attacking the Syrian state in pursuit of regime change that suits the West and its European and regional allies (especially exposed false flag attack plotter, Ghouta sarin attack organiser, gun runner, chemical use trainer and intermediary of al-Qaeda affiliated Islamist 'rebel' Western proxy attackers besieging the hobbled Syrian government).
Turkey aka DADDY-ISIS
Obama Cries
Oft-Cited Defence of Israel by American Empire
Turkey "has the right to defend"
"In a sign that the incident might jeopardise co-operation over Syria, Mr Putin went on to accuse Ankara of supplying finance and military support to jihadist extremists, asking: “Do they want to put Nato at Isis’s service?” “Today’s loss is a stab in the back by the accomplices of terrorism,” a visibly angry Mr Putin told state TV. “We have always treated Turkey as a friendly state. I don’t know in whose interests today’s incident is, but it’s not in ours.” US president Barack Obama said Turkey “has the right to defend its territory and airspace” but also called for both countries to calm down."
Hakan Fidan, Turkey's head of National Intelligence Organization (Turkey), along with Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoğlu (as well as Turkish military), was exposed on audio tape, plotting false flag operation incursions into Syria, to stage an 'attack' on Turkey that would be used as a 'casus belli', or justification for subsequent attack in neighbouring Syria.
It is not entirely clear to me what the objective is, but I believe the objective would be to enable Turkey to stockpile arms to aid a fighting force of 1,000 to be installed among the proxy multinational Islamist forces attempting to bring down Assad's government. Presumably, it would be an opportunity to run arms and military personnel into Syria and to assist on the ground, also?
OBJECTIVE -- was to have USA attack Syria; US had 35 Pentagon attack plans drawn & rejected, because they weren't crippling enough on Syria military, which they want totally destroyed (the after-effect of which will be another Libya: destroyed, years of civil war in a vacuum) - see Seymour Hersh expose -- post here.
Oh, and White House lied. US military sources knew Assad not capable of the sarin attack Ghouta.
CIA & MI6 & Turkey running weapons Libya to Syria via Turkey. US had secret agreement with Turkey re the gun running to al-Qaeda, which is managed by Turkey (the middle man, that's very active in controlling or manipulating the 'rebel' groups (al-Qaeda or other Islamist), and it is Turkey that has arranged the Ghouta chemical attack, having supplied chemicals and having trained the 'rebels', which means hundreds were killed in a staged attack ... At the very least, Americans and British turned a blind eye, as they know the lay of the land in Turkey and Turkey's position (re potential false flag), and were aware al-Qaeda linked militants had access to chemicals via Turkey), so what took place was pretty much anticipated by advisers.
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar bankroll the proxies (ie the 'rebels' militants) in Syria.
Casus belli (Latin)
"An act or event that provokes or is used to justify war"
[wikipedia]
************
Recording of Head of Turkey Intelligence, Hakan Fidan, FM & Military
-->
Discuss False Flag Attack in Syria
TURKISH VERSION
***
Recording Turkey Intelligence Plotting False Flag Attack
As Pretext for American
Attack on Syria
ENGLISH CAPTIONS
***
TURKEY GOVT & INTELLIGENCE FALSE FLAG ATTACK PLOTTING CAPTURED ON AUDIO & LEAKED ON YOUTUBE
Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria 'War' Conversation Between Erdogan Officials
Jack Moore
By Jack Moore
March 27, 2014 16:57 GMT
"Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ban of YouTube occurred after a conversation was leaked between Head of Turkish Intelligence Hakan Fidan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu that he wanted removed from the video-sharing website."
Population displacement is a consequence, but I believe the large-scale movement is by design and I note that the International Monetary Fund appears invested in maintaining the gates of Europe open.
Currently there's 7 million Muslims in Germany (single source). That that figure is larger than the entire population of Slovakia, or the populations of Croatia and Bratislava combined -- ie these are European countries.
Hungary currently has in the vicinity of 30,0000 Muslims (over 3,000 of whom are Arabs). This is a surprisingly high number given the speech given by a journalist and Orban supporter, who was determined to close the door to the latest wave of non-European immigration.
These minority population figures tend to vary here and there, depending on source. Expect the figures are also grossly underestimated or understated, judging by the fiddling and deliberate efforts that are made to hide non-European ethnicity re: immigration, reproduction, unemployment and crime.
Above statistical mentions are just figures that I ran into today and the other day.
The German, Swedish, French, Belgian, Italian and British figures are probably at some critical point -- especially the German, Swedish and French.
I'm too lazy to check now, but, from recollection, the stated figures range between 10-15% of various Muslim high-minority rates in European populations. Again, I think that would represent a very conservative figure, because they don't do adequate record keeping (eg make records reflect generational results, crime results etc), and because there's much other honesty in this regard. As the 'guest' populations have larger families, non-Europeans are a faster growing demographic, so reaching the 20% mark cannot be too far off.
Twenty percent non-European foreigners is huge, and I really cannot see how this would be acceptable for Europeans, unless the Europeans are planning on handing over their birthright to the non-European settlers among them.
Large scale non-European immigration to Europe has progressively increased over the post WWII decades, and in the last few years such immigration has substantially stepped up, because of long-term aggression and serial aggression abroad that Americans have generated, producing blanket chaos.
The initial post WWII non-European immigration was for the purpose of economic recovery (or so the story goes).
Immigration has more recently undergone a massive cross-borders movement explosion, that's spanned years of problematic immigration to Italy, from Libya, which was destroyed as result of Western intervention in 2011 (when Gaddafi's assassination was arranged). France was in the thick of this, as well.
Colonel Gaddafi had warned Europe that his state was what kept Europe from being overrun by immigration from Africa. As I understand, Gaddafi was paid by Europe to keep the the flood at bay.
Yikes!!!
Gaddafi warns
of 'al Qaeda threat'
Gaddafi told Turkey's TRT channel that the West only wanted to take action so it could seize control of Libyan oil.
He also claimed that if he stepped down, it would leave a power vacuum to be filled by al-Qaeda:
"We are the ones preventing al-Qaeda from taking control ..." - Gaddafi
" ... they would drag the whole region into chaos."
Gaddafi repeated his accusations that al-Qaeda were the ones fomenting the violence inside Libya.
As many as 6,000 people are estimated to have died since the unrest erupted in mid February [2011].
***
Gaddafi: Wall of Libya that stopped a migration stream to Europe
***
ISIS Threatens to Unleash 500,000 Immigrants into Europe if Attacked in Libya
***
Germany's and the European Union's push may well be in the service of an interested and approving International Monetary Fund, and other organisations like it, who's focus is on expanding the global economy (I think it was), and ensuring European economic integration.
The ONLY concern of IMF (and banker organisations) is for growing profits for bankers, rather than protecting the vital interests of native Europeans.
Given how large, persistent and organised this migration appears to be, I would not be surprised if was a US, EU (and friends) funded and arranged endeavour to force European 'integration', along with social, political and national (sovereign) disintegration that will weaken the native populations' working classes.
On the other hand, this could be a kind of unstoppable Biblical Armageddon exodus from the Middle East and Africa that Europe perhaps cannot stop. I'm thinking along those lines because I'm thinking of Gaddafi's warning and the fact that Europe had to pay Libya to keep south of the border out. On the other hand, if that were the case, it would be insanity not to put a stop to the invasion immediately. Letting it run its course would be letting Europe go under faster rather than slower.
The disaster that Europe has been courting for decades before flinging the gates of Europe open to millions from other continents, could have been avoided. But it wasn't avoided, because the European leaders are indifferent to the costs to native populations and are on a different track to the populations whose interests they are meant to serve.
The displaced persons are a side-effect of war. All these politicians know that. Yet they did not (a) refrain from destruction that causes displacement or (b) make alternative arrangements for the displaced, away from the European continent.
Facts, causes and effects, patterns, consequences, and all manner of statistics and analyses were available to these politicians.
These money-serving, nation destroying politicians have had years in which to make alternative arrangements, instead of imposing mass immigration on domestic populations.
But the politicians and the media spin mass population movement as if it were (a) some accident; (b) some 'crisis,' like a natural disaster; and (c) Europe's obligation.
However, it is not Europe's obligation to destroy European demographics and European culture, or to set in motion the genocide of European man, for the sake of mopping up the American empire's war consequences or for the sake of living up to what are merely 'humanitarian' ideals, divorced of on the ground reality for the host populations that are called to make enormous and enduring sacrifices for outsiders, whose growth in European communities is inevitable and very, very costly to host, beyond monetary terms. It's the social costs that are deadly.
So costly, that I think it is not unreasonable to expect civil war, whether sooner or later.
Of course, the migration is (a) no mere accident; (b) no natural disaster; and (c)Europe's suicidal path cannot be rationally justified.
European and Western politician liars and lowlifes feign 'humanitarian' concern for displaced populations that THEY THEMSELVES HAVE WILFULLY DISPLACED through acts of aggression, conducted in the service of their monied masters (international bankers and multinational corporations), under the same 'humanitarian' pretext.
The 'humanitarian' angle is handy philosophical spin used to justify aggression abroad and to spindoctor theinevitable consequences in the form of large scale population displacement & relocation, as:
(a) the fault of governments targeted by American imperialist aggression (rather than the fault of those that aggress);
(b) the reason to attack the target of American imperialist aggression; and
(c) 'humanitarian concern' of the American empire and its vassals and hatchet-men, even as they subject their domestic populations to:
enduring debt, displacement, diminished amenities, diminished services, competition for their own resources, diminished and deminishing demographic, diminished political power, polarisation, danger, death, knife attacks, rape, rape and more rape (even guys are getting raped: the imperialist Libyan solder project gone wrong - Libyan soldiers rape British man and go on drunken rampage, to the tune of £500,000 - here), gang rapes galore (esp. Sweden), assaults, death threats, intimidation, assassinations, political suppression and general oppression in matters of freedom of expression and freedom of speech (think of the effects of artists in hiding because of death threats, Charlie Hebdo murders, murdered Dutch film-maker, Theo van Gogh -- people speak of a 'chilling effect' on this and that: it doesn't get any more chilling than being carved up on the street in broad daylight); speaking of which, there's the various murders (mother and son broad daylight IKEA murder Sweden, by Africans; the London broad daylight hacking murder of Lee Rigby by Nigerians); violent protests, no-go zones, race riots, enclave riots, destruction of property and the potential for same. This isn't an exhaustive list: it's just some of what comes to mind when considering the mandated social experiment, which is, in reality, simply the attendant cost of empire building and expansion -- the cost of being vassal of the warring & profiteering masters of the American empire.
Then there is the massive, totalitarian surveillance,political policing and the militarised police state, that robs the domestic populations of civil liberties and acquires its powers, largely from the risks that the said state imports, via its wars of aggression abroad, the resulting displacement and mass population transfer allotted between the henchmen of the American empire.
It is the rotting fruit of costly, taxpayer funded aggression abroad, pursed on behalf of the elite few, for rewards that are gained by the same elite few, at the expense of the taxed and burdened many, who not only pay, but also pay for the 'privilege' of being displaced, assaulted, intimidated, raped, slaughtered and eventually biologically erased, as has been set in motion by mass population transfer and its consequences.
After decades of propaganda from Western intelligentsia generally, academia, government, interest groups, media (which is has very broad reach and influence & is a carrier of messages, 'cultural' messages, accepted values, ideology etc), the Western public has been indoctrinated to accept idealist philosophical notions of 'Western values', universalism, globalism, relativism, egalitarianism, 'democracy', liberalism and so forth, at the expense of retention of identity, tradition, culture, nationalism and birthright (among many more core aspects of group identity), which is at risk but has been downplayed, discouraged, dismissed, disparaged etc, creating docile subjects for what appears to be an economic and social experiment conducted by the American empire and its vassals -- but is no experiment at all: it is merely an outcome and strategy of American empire building and profiteering, that shall manifest the destruction of Europe, the homeland of Europeans, and in the genocide of the European peoples.
It is as if the select among the intelligentsia, academia and media have become new Church and nobility, while the object of worship is a new Christ (victim): the 'human' species.
1. the new clergy & new nobility: intelligentsia. 2. the new 'Christ': man & his idealised rights. 3. the new doctrine: liberalism and relativism.
Or something like that. Ideas might need developing (or discarding, lol).
While manipulating public perception and opinion, ostensibly advocating on behalf of displaced populations, politicians do so having spent taxpayer money on generating this displaced demographic through war -- war that is waged in the interests of the few, paid for by the many who are the producers, consumers and taxpayers (and therefore the economy).
Having imposed the burden of war debt on the non decision-making and powerless taxpayer, the politician will shamelessly urge his nation to surrender its homogeneity (or primacy) and its heritage. But national heritage cannot rightfully be surrendered or assigned by anyone - it is inherited from ancestors and borne by blood. Therefore, the people of Europe are being displaced and supplanted on the soil of their ancestors.
As for migration generally, check out a couple of examples (below) of shameless hypocrisy from VP Biden, whose government has created what the politicians and the media are calling 'Syrian refugees' (in fact, immigrants from all over the Middle East and Africa, some of whom are economic migrants, converging on Europe to take advantage of the open invitation, undefended borders and generous state support, particularly the offerings of Germany's Merkel.
Politicians play on people's feelings and let boatload after boatload over the border for supposedly 'humanitarian' reasons, although these politicians never display anything remotely resembling humanitarian consideration or conduct on the domestic front.
The great Western regime change quest that's spanned at least 14 years now (in Afghanistan alone) has therefore produced 14 years outflow of immigration from that location to Western and European communities, but what of the costs, inevitable consequences and the risks of mass population movement imposed on economically enslaved, impotent and politically hobbled domestic populations, decade after decade?
Check out Biden's emotive spin and feigned concern for orphans, children, women, survivors of 'torture' and people desperate for medical help.
Oh, please. We've seen a series of Middle Eastern and African American empire invasions and corresponding Middle Eastern and African invasions of Europe, by mostly aggressive, able-bodied young men, so spare us the tear-jerking tales of orphans (orphaned-by-USA) ... but farmed off to vassal Europe for years now, while America was tossing their allotment back in the 'sea' like undersized fish (I'm not kidding -- the Americans would opt for a minuscule intake that would be pared down to next to nothing, after they reject those they don't want on 'national security grounds', I believe it was. Fair enough. But what of Europe, does Europe not have the same rights as the Americans and, if so, why has Europe not exercised those rights, particularly following the American caused financial meltdown and the fall-out from that, as well as austerity measures?
What Europe is doing does not add up. And the contradictions do not make sense -- eg. deliberate population movement (population movement by design) or: invasion that Europe is unable to stop (and if so, why?).
NOTE
Mass migratory invasion of Europe possibly also explained by the following -- ie. in terms of strategic depopulation of a region as a war weapon and/or strategic forced displacement as an instrument of coercion on Europe (ie an instrument of war), used against Europe by the declared Islamic Caliphate -- in which case the Western propaganda, acceptance of invasion and failure to secure boundaries makes warped 'sense':
Elites and their puppet governments expect you, the European taxpayer, to pay for this and to take onerous social consequences on-board -- irrespective of the immense costs beyond material costs.
There's an article below that refers to the bombings that France has been involved in in Africa, which would partly explain the droves of Africans on European soil.
#France - 8,000 military personnel stationed abroad
3,000 in Operation Barkhane (vs Islamist) in
Mali
Chad
Niger
Mauritania
Burkina Faso
15 Oct 2014
Immigrants entering Europe would do so on the basis of varying degrees of danger, poverty and conditions of chaos in their homelands.
By the look of the above list (which is not a definitive list of African actions), Africa is probably in as much disarray as the Middle East.
However, what the European elites do is not the collective responsibility of the European people.
The European public is not collectively culpable for creating those conditions abroad that corporate-serving politicians pursue and manifest.
Even if one argued that Europeans are collectively responsible for the actions of politicians and elites they do not control, no European can rationally be expected or obliged to commit what amounts to collective European suicide by way of mass migration intake.
COMMENT
If the above comments are rambling and unclear, I blame it on my usual inability to compose ... as well as a marathon spell of not having slept. Too tired to properly focus.
The above are just thoughts I have on the subject and I realise the ideas I have are not those of the liberal left or of the authorities (and their class of messengers) promoting liberalism, globalism, open borders and so on.
The ideas I have are influenced by a feeling component and the feeling is strongly in favour of what I consider European interests.
The progressive converts who worship at the altar of the Cult of Mankind (the species) at the centre of the religion of the American Empire, corresponding with the empire's expanding global, military and trade ambitions, will no doubt find my take on things 'regressive'.
But is there a truth, an absolute objective truth in matters such as this? I say no. Your constructs are not my constructs and they cannot be, because your constructs, ideals and principles are not universally applicable.
Truth, in terms of broad principles, ideals, values etc (abstract things as opposed to concrete things, I guess), is just where you are inclined to stand, and that depends on many things.
Politically 'supporting', to the extent of having some interest or sympathy for various peoples abroad, does not translate, for me, to welcoming or accepting the end of Europe as the homeland of European peoples, or acceptance of decline of European demographics and the plunder of European historical, cultural, political and other resources.
Anglo-Saxon / European demographics, dress, customs, sights and sounds are my comfort zone, and to state the obvious: proximity to overwhelming foreign demographics, foreign enclaves, no-go zones, foreign religious structures, religiosity, and non-Western religiously symbolic attire, is not within the comprehension or comfort zone.
Being engulfed doesn't make sense, when this is not what one was born for or what one may have 'signed up' for, as would be the case, for example, by perhaps choosing to relocate to live in completely different environmental, biological and cultural surroundings.
The large numbers of attacks on women in Europe, horrific types of crimes (such as the honour killings of daughters), horrific daylight murder of Dutch film-maker and others mentioned above, Nordic artists in hiding from non-Europeans in their ancestors' homelands and under police protection (death threats), various rapes, gang rapes, assaults and murders, and the periodic murderous attacks on Westerners (eg Lee Rigby, Charlie Hebdo and Paris) that accompanying European displacement and so much more, are but a few steps on the passive, silent, sleepwalk towards certain European extinction.
All of the above produce the experience of strong and unpleasant dissonance, due to the combination of opposing attitudes: curiosity, interest, a degree of 'support' in relation to some events abroad, albeit on a shallow level (like supporting a sports team) and in a compartmentalised way, that's hard to explain. On a primal, emotional level, however, there's an inability to accept Europe as anything but European. In turn, support of things non-European, on an intellectual, compartmentalised and sort of arm's length way, is rendered hollow by emotions that emerge in relation to events in Europe.
*Excuse typos, I've got to crash ... + excuse the weirdness of my posts. lol I like to throw in whatever comes to mind and to hand, at the time of composing a post.
Ready to launch ... this is it! ;)
it's WAR
Biden's Hypocrisy & Propaganda
1. Aggress: engage in economic sanctions,
covert infiltration & destabilisation,
sponsor proxy wars,
pursue regime change,
execute 'goodwill' bombings abroad,
if not engage in open, declared war,
in pursuit of American corporate empire hegemonic & profit-making agenda aims
2. burden & displace
local populations of target, as side-effect
3. use 'humanitarian' pretext to seek open war
4. use 'humanitarian' propaganda
to feign humanitarian 'concern'
- as justification & disguise
5. use 'humanitarian' propaganda
to urge indoctrinated & passive domestic populations to accept responsibility for foreign mass movement generated by American empire aggression manifestingthevery movement
of war target populations
6. spend taxpayer money
(or lock taxpayer into national debt to bankers)
for wars abroad that benefit the few,
& pass it off to the many that pay,
as 'national security'
7. spend taxpayer money
(or lock taxpayer into national debt to bankers)
on shifting side-effect non-European war target populations
onto European soil,
for wars waged abroad for benefit of few,
& pass it off to the many that pay dearly,
as 'humanitarian' and an 'obligation'
8. serially destroy war targets
for masters of American empire, selling mercantile American empire profit-making agenda as Imperial Religion humanitarianism, liberalism, democracy & universalism. it's WAR
9. destroy European demographics & culture,
& pave the way to genocide of European man
on both European soil
& in European societies,
via mass non-European war target human displacement & movement,
as result of American empire
pursuit of profit-making aims of the few,
to the detriment of the many
Vast majority of 'refugees' aren't Syrian
Stolen passports, forged passports
discarded documentation
'Syrian refugees' media and social media handle was probably chosen in order to:
(a) personaliseand therefore 'sell', a massive Biblical column of people marching onto Europe from the cradle of civilisation;
(b) to sidestep Western explanation (& accountability) ... eg. the West has been instrumental in helping cause widespread destruction and chaos over two continents;
before progressing to further the long-termproject aimed at destroying Europe with war & profit target human exodus strategic absorption.
it's WAR
Biden's Spin
Biden's Spin
Joe Biden's
Hey, Watch Me Shift entire population
of the Middle East & Africa to Europe
Sleight of Hand
assertion
of playing into terrorists' hands
bymaintaining national borders firmly in place is more deception
it's WAR
the mass migration transfer is either:
1. strategic depopulation of multiple war targets' populations by invitation of Angela Merkel & the European Union which does not ring true nor does tent cities in European winter etc.
It does not make sense to strategically
depopulate multiple nations,
but populations of multiple nations
are flooding Europe,
at the rate of MILLIONS
the West surely cannot be that desperate for a Syria win
no matter what the stakes OR
2. Islamic Statemade good their threat to flood Europe withhuman war weapons involving strategic/engineered mass migration threatened or forced upon an opponent in war, as a coercive or otherwise damaging measure inflicted on the other side (Europe, in this case)
OR
3. this is some evil banker / IMF plot for European integration into global markets & banker profits ... but, while this sounds plausible, when you read IMF representatives promoting the third world invasion of Europe, it does not hold when Europe is subject to austerity and when something like 50% of those in Spain are unemployed.
************
Tentative Conclusion
Best bet: Islamic State
(and whoever is connected with Islamic State)
is flooding Europe
by facilitating passage
or
maybe George Soros & Islamic State have done a deal ... ;)
************
Humorous
( kinda ... )
song worth thinking about in critical, class struggle terms:
But not as much, if you consider that voices of ordinary people weigh less and are routinely suppressed, diminished, dismissed, and ridiculed by zealots of oneness and liberalism, who claim to fight fascism ... (while employing the religiously fevered liberal-left form of fascism, when not employing lunatic terror and violence tactics to deny others of democratic rights -- eg in Sweden).
"IT'S THE PEOPLE'S VOICE CRUSADERS FIGHTING POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. TALKBACK GODS REVEAL THE TRUTH CALL US NOW AND SPIT OUT THE VENOM FROM STRUGGLE ST"
[I've no idea what the Alan Jones talk-show is about (although I've quickly checked out the Parrot video where he swears heaps).
Expect he makes a song and dance about some issue or other on radio, because he's a showman aiming for controversy and ratings. Bet the liberal left consider the topics of discussion 'blasphemous.' ... lol]
❤
************
Dennis Aubrey Sings a Song for Julian Assange (Woody Guthrie)
************
[List below is not a complete overview, it is merely some of what I've read; most of which I've probably forgotten by now]
Articles
#ISIS #Syria Reagan era USA is responsible for reviving jihad CIA recruiting worldwide for jihad
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Over 160 ARMS cargo
FLIGHTS to Syria rebels
most from Qatar + Saudi Arabia
/ to Turkey & Jordan since Jan 2012
Croatia sold arms to Saudi Arabia,
which were funnelled to
terrorists in Syria via Jordan
Link | here
Archive #Syria
Turkey
sponsoring al-Qaeda & ISIS
>US military aid to “moderate” rebels coordinated in Turkey
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
#Turkey wants to depose #Assad
& is OK with ISIS extremists
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
PROPAGANDA ... Oooooooo, la, la
Spanning Both Sides of Atlantic
Bernard Henri Levy
'Why Obama and Hollande are right on Syria'
ENGLISH
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Nafeez Ahmed
#Russia #Syria #Turkey
NATO is harbouring the Islamic State
Turks caught supplying al-Qaeda proxies Syria
Link | here
There are traditional weapons, atomic weapons, chemical weapons. And now, we can see that there exists the ethnic weapon. And now, this is what has been deployed against Europe and the white race by invisible hands. Friends, in Afghanistan, 1979 May, that is 36 years, there has been constant war. Syria has been in a war for the sixth year. In Pakistan, there is no war. Nor in Bangladesh. In large portions of Africa, it has been horribly difficult to live for centuries or, at times, life can be unbearable there. Let's pose the question, finally. Why ... Let's pose the question. Why is it that, suddenly now, it came into everyone's mind who live in such places to start moving towards Europe? From everywhere, and at once. Why? Let's say loudly and with a cool head:
This is an artificial, contrived migratory movement. [applause] And its goal the permanent and irreversible alternation of the religious and ethnic foundations of Europe. For this aim, they have already manufactured the ideologies. One of them already said -- according to the Harvard professor, the white race must be erased. But there is an ideology aside from this, too. Let's watch the economic gurus and their statements made with unassailable confidence. Europe is not reproducing, it will quickly age and so we need immigration, for blood renewal purposes and for there to be someone to work for our pensions. This is how one of the scripts goes. Or, the controllers of this diseased continent aren't telling us to reproduce and be plentiful, but to accept EVERY type of foreignness that just happens to come our way. How can that be possible? How does and how can such a scale of self-identity destruction exist? We will immediately understand this, too, once we listen to the economic script. The Daimler car manufacturer's President says that they just happened to need such young and motivated manpower that can be seen in the masses of illegal immigrants currently pouring into Europe. My dear friends, today Europe is incapable of giving work even to its own young people. Let's not be mistaken. Today, British young people are emigrating to Australia and New Zealand. That's where they try their luck. And Hungarian young people head to Britain. Romanian young people go largely everywhere where Latin languages are spoken. The Poles likewise go to Britain. The Spanish youth, for the time being, are not emigrating anywhere. However, amongst the, unemployment is over 50%. And in THIS situation comes the Daimler President and he realises that the Syrian masons and Bedouin goat pastors represent the ideal workforce. [applause] My dear friends, at times like this, one inevitably thinks that this man has lost his mind. It seems so. But I have a bit of bad news. It ONLY seems so. The actual truth is, my dear friends that this is truly an insane remark, but there is indeed a method to it, for the Syrian mason and the Bedouin goat pastor will actually complete the given work for 20% of the lowest possible wage. It is this 20% of the wages that made Europe's leaders lose their minds. It is for this much that they want to sell us and ruin our Europe. Our own leaders at Brussels. And the various controllers of Western powers do exactly the same. It is for this and in the name of some brainless, and completely faulty, badly interpreted general 'human rights' platitudes. And anyone who dares speak up against this immediately becomes a 'Nazi' and this is how a Hitler moustache is put under his nose. But, I have some bad news for these scumbags:
to the Austrian Chancellor;
to the French Foreign Minister;
to the rotten-to-the-core, lying and disreputable journalists of Western media;
and, of course, to the worthless scumbags of 'Magyar Narancs', as well.
The bad news is, my dear friends, that out of the 500 million native citizens of Europe -- how should I say, 'natives' -- today, largely 450 million of them do NOT want to see any more immigrants. [applause; shouting] And the Hungarian Prime Minister represents their desires. He speaks the truth in their place that which, for now due to the opinion terrorism of these no one dares to say. It's bad news for you 'Magyar Narancs', Austrian Chancellor, Western media, French Foreign Minister. It's also bad new the current central portion of Europe represents normalcy. WE represent it! [applause] My dear friends, WE represent normalcy, those who say 'no' to the idiotic and Pharisaic quota system. Let's applaud them all:
Long live Finland! Long live Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia! Long live Denmark! Long live -- once again -- Poland! Long live the Czech Republic! And, yes, long live Slovakia! Long live Romania! And last, but not least, long live Hungary!
And the situation is, my dear friends, that these scumbags can draw the Hitler moustache underneath the noses of the listed Prime Ministers, too, and under the noses of 450 million European citizens, as well. But we, in good faith, and with the patience of a psychiatrist, are warning them where everyone is a 'Nazi', no-one is a 'Nazi' any longer. The situation is, my dear friends, that these mentally-ill and brainless scumbags are actually not insulting us, but that which is one of the biggest taboos. They, with their constant 'Nazi' outcries are insulting the victims of the Holocaust. Now, in these times, they want to create fear and panic in us and, of course, rage. This is why they are threatening us and provoking us, so that we will lose our composure and be unable to act rationally. This is why I said we must maintain our cold blood and our sober judgment-making. This is how we must act: with cool heads. This is how we must maintain central-eastern Europe's unity. This is how we must represent the deciding majority of the Europeans' will and opinion. It is for among these reasons that we demand that the leaders of the EU do, indeed, send out a referendum on the question of immigration. And this is why we support and assure our solidarity for the Hungarian government and Prime Minister, Victor Orban. ... and that which was first said by Gandalf the Grey in the mines of Moria, on the bridge of Khazad-dum to the demon of the ancient world:
You shall not pass!
Let's say this nice and loud. Let everyone hear it. Let those on the southern border hear:
You shall not pass!
... From this place, we send the message to everyone. The fence is being built so that we will be able to protect not only our own homeland, but the entire European Union as well. The fence is being built so that we may finally get validation from the EU's still active, valid laws, which have not been terminated by anyone. ...
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
COMMENT
Thoroughly enjoyed that.
Looks like there's still some sanity and life left in Europe. ;)
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Harvard professor argues for 'abolishing' white race
By - The Washington Times - Wednesday, September 4, 2002 Noel Ignatiev, a founder of a journal called Race Traitor and a fellow at Harvard's W.E.B. DuBois Institute, a leading black-studies department, argues in the current issue of Harvard Magazine that "abolishing the white race" is "so desirable that some may find it hard to believe" that anyone other than "committed white supremacists" would oppose it. In excerpts appearing this week in newspapers nationwide, Mr. Ignatiev, who is white, writes that "every group within white America," including "labor unionists, ethnic groups, college students, schoolteachers, taxpayers and white women" has at one time or another "advanced its particular and narrowly defined interests at the expense of black people as a race." Mr. Ignatiev pledges in the essay that his journal, Race Traitor, intends to "keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."
His colleagues at Harvard seem not to take his proposal entirely seriously. Others cite the article as an example of Harvard's institutional racism. Sara Stillman, assistant to the publisher of Harvard Magazine, says there's clearly some "misunderstanding" about what Mr. Ignatiev means by the inflammatory language. Asked in a 1997 interview with the New York Times if he hates his own white skin, Mr. Ignatiev said, "No, but I want to abolish the privileges." "The white race is like a private club based on one huge assumption that all those who look white, are, whatever their complaints or reservations, fundamentally loyal to the race. We want to dissolve that club, to explode it," he said. Christopher Reed, executive editor of Harvard Magazine, defended what Mr. Ignatiev wrote in the September-October issue. "He's arguing against the mind-set and attitude that automatically grants privileges to white people he wants more fairness," Mr. Reed said in a statement. The university's public affairs office said it had no comment. The article already has stirred anger among some conservatives, who see the article as typical of the liberal climate in academia. "Suppose Frontpagemagazine.com ran a headline 'Abolish the Black Race'?" asks David Horowitz on his magazine's Web site. "What do you think the reaction would be? But at Harvard, where demonizing whites is merely the standard curriculum, an article like this can appear in a glossy magazine whose cover story is 'Whither the Art Museum?' "Race hatred, if directed against white people, is just part of the progressive culture," says Mr. Horowitz, a radical-turned-conservative and author of "Civil Wars: The Controversy Over Reparations for Slavery." Mr. Ignatiev, a one-time steelworker and Marxist activist who earned a doctorate at Harvard, could not be reached for comment. But he writes about what he believes at the Web site of Race Traitor, whose motto is: "Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity." "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in U.S. society," the journal's statement of purpose says. "The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interestsabove class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse." Among the "privileges" of being white, according to Race Traitor, are not being followed by security in stores, not being harassed by police, having easier access to better schools, jobs and housing, and not being asked whether skin color or affirmative action got you a job. In the essay in Harvard Magazine, Mr. Ignatiev says he always expected "bewilderment" at his views from "people who still think of race as biology."
"We frequently get letters accusing us of being 'racists' just like the KKK, and have even been called a 'hate group.'" he wrote. Mr. Ignatiev attempts to clarify how he could be seeking to abolish the white race without calling for genocide. "Our standard response is to draw an analogy with anti-royalism: to oppose monarchy does not mean killing the king; it means getting rid of crowns, thrones, royal titles, etc." Abolition of a monarchy has often been marked by killing the monarch and sometimes his family members; for example, England in 1649, France in 1792, Russia in 1917 and Iraq in 1958. Even those nations that have abolished kings or emperors without regicide generally have forced the monarch into exile. Mr. Ignatiev grew up in a Philadelphia family that he says was devoid of racial bias. As a child, he swam at a free community pool, where he was the only white patron. He says his parents refused to pay a $1 fee that was designed to keep other public pools all-white. Mr. Ignatiev's parents, Jewish immigrants from Russia, were not college educated, but he attended the University of Pennsylvania, dropping out after three years. He worked in a Chicago steel mill and in factories that made farm equipment and electrical parts for two decades. At the steel mill, he helped organize strikes and protests by the predominantly black work force. He was laid off from the steel mill in 1984, a year after he was arrested on charges of throwing a paint bomb at a strike-breaker's car. He set up Marxist discussion groups in the early 1980s. In 1985, Mr. Ignatiev was accepted to the Harvard Graduate School of Education without an undergraduate degree. After earning his master's, he joined the Harvard faculty as a lecturer and worked toward a doctorate in U.S. history.
His dissertation was his book, "How the Irish Became White." Mr. Ignatiev said the book told how Irish immigrants came to the United States and became "oppressors" by emulating American whites.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 