Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY [LINK | Article]
Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria 'War' Conversation Between Erdogan Officials
Jack Moore
By Jack Moore
March 27, 2014 16:57 GMT
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ban of YouTube occurred after a conversation was leaked between Head of Turkish Intelligence Hakan Fidan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğluthat he wanted removed from the video-sharing website.
Full transcript (translated by @castizbey):
Ahmet Davutoğlu:
"Prime Minister said that in current conjuncture, this attack (on Suleiman Shah Tomb) must be seen as an opportunity for us."
Hakan Fidan:
"I'll send 4 men from Syria, if that's what it takes. I'll make up a cause of war by ordering a missile attack on Turkey; we can also prepare an attack on Suleiman Shah Tomb if necessary."
Feridun Sinirlioğlu:
"Our national security has become a common, cheap domestic policy outfit."
Yaşar Güler: "It's a direct cause of war. I mean, what're going to do is a direct cause of war."
--------
FIRST SCREEN:
Ahmet Davutoğlu: I couldn't entirely understand the other thing; what exactly does our foreign ministry supposed to do? No, I'm not talking about the thing. There are other things we're supposed to do. If we decide on this, we are to notify the United Nations, the Istanbul Consulate of the Syrian regime, right?
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: But if we decide on an operation in there, it should create a shocking effect. I mean, if we are going to do so. I don't know what we're going to do, but regardless of what we decide, I don't think it'd be appropriate to notify anyone beforehand.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: OK, but we're gonna have to prepare somehow. To avoid any shorts on regarding international law. I just realised when I was talking to the president (Abdullah Gül), if the Turkish tanks go in there, it means we're in there in any case, right?
Yaşar Güler: It means we're in, yes.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Yeah, but there's a difference between going in with aircraft and going in with tanks...
SECOND SCREEN:
Yaşar Güler: Maybe we can tell the Syrian consulate general that, ISIL is currently working alongside the regime, and that place is Turkish land. We should definitely...
Ahmet Davutoğlu: But we have already said that, sent them several diplomatic notes.
Yaşar Güler: To Syria...
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: That's right.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Yes, we've sent them countless times. Therefore, I'd like to know what our Chief of Staff's expects from our ministry.
Yaşar Güler: Maybe his intent was to say that, I don't really know, he met with Mr. Fidan.
Hakan Fidan: Well, he did mention that part but we didn't go into any further details.
Yaşar Güler: Maybe that was what he meant... A diplomatic note to Syria?
Hakan Fidan: Maybe the Foreign Ministry is assigned with coordination...
THIRD SCREEN:
Ahmet Davutoğlu: I mean, I could coordinate the diplomacy but civil war, the military...
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: That's what I told back there. For one thing, the situation is different. An operation on ISIL has solid ground on international law. We're going to portray this is Al-Qaeda, there's no distress there if it's a matter regarding Al-Qaeda. And if it comes to defending Suleiman Shah Tomb, that's a matter of protecting our land.
Yaşar Güler: We don't have any problems with that.
Hakan Fidan: Second after it happens, it'll cause a great internal commotion (several bombing events is bound to happen within). The border is not under control...
Feridun Sinirlioğlu:I mean, yes, the bombings are of course going to happen. But I remember our talk from 3 years ago...
Yaşar Güler: Mr. Fidan should urgently receive back-up and we need to help him supply guns and ammo to rebels. We need to speak with the minister. Our Interior Minister, our Defense Minister. We need to talk about this and reach a resolution sir.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: How did we getspecial forces into action when there was a threat in Northern Iraq? We should have done so in there, too. We should have trained those men. We should have sent men. Anyway, we can't do that, we can only do what diplomacy...
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: I told you back then, for God's sake, General, you know how we managed to get those tanks in, you were there.
Yaşar Güler: What, you mean our stuff?
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: Yes, how do you think we've managed to rally our tanks into Iraq? How? How did we manage to get special forces, the battalions in? I was involved in that. Let me be clear, there was no government decision on that, we have managed that just with a single order.
FOURTH SCREEN:
Yaşar Güler: Well, I agree with you. For one thing, we're not even discussing that. But there are different things that Syria can do right now.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: General, the reason we're saying no to this operation is because we know about the capacity of those men.
Yaşar Güler: Look, sir, isn't MKE (Mechanical and Chemical Industry Corporation) at minister's bidding? Sir, I mean, Qatar is looking for ammo to buy in cash. Ready cash. So, why don't they just get it done? It's at Mr. Minister's command.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: But there's the spot we can't act integratedly, we can't coordinate.
Yaşar Güler: Then, our Prime Minister can summon both Mr.Defence Minister and Mr. Minister at the same time. Then he can directly talk to them.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: We, Mr. Siniroğlu and I, have literally begged Mr. Prime Minster for a private meeting, we said that things were not looking so bright.
FIFTH SCREEN:
Yaşar Güler: Also, it doesn't have to be a crowded meeting. Yourself [Foreign Minister], Mr. Defence Minister, Mr. Interior Minister and our Chief of Staff, the four of you are enough. There's no need for a crowd. Because, sir, the main need there is guns and ammo. Not even guns, mainly ammo. We've just talked about this, sir. Let's say we're building an army down there, 1000 strong. If we get them into that war without previously storing a minimum of 6-months' worth of ammo, these men will return to us after two months.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: They're back already.
Yaşar Güler: They'll return to us, sir.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: They've came back from... What was it? Çobanbey.
Yaşar Güler: Yes, indeed, sir. This matter can't be just a burden on Mr. Fidan's shoulders as it is now. It's unacceptable. I mean, we can't understand this. Why?
SIXTH SCREEN:
Ahmet Davutoğlu: That evening we'd reached a resolution. And I thought that things were taking a turn for the good. Our...
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: We issued the MGK (National Security Council) resolution the day after. Then we talked with the general...
Ahmet Davutoğlu: And the other forces really do a good follow up on this weakness of ours. You say that you're going to capture this place, and that men being there constitutes a risk factor. You pull them back. You capture the place. You reinforce it and send in your troops again.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Right? That's how I interpret it. But after the evacuation, this is not a military necessity. It's a whole other thing.
SEVENTH SCREEN
Feridun Siniroğlu: There are some serious shifts in global and regional geopolitics. It now can spread to other places. You said it yourself today, and others agreed... We're headed to a different game now. We should be able to see those. That ISIL and all that jazz, all those organisations are extremely open to manipulation.Having a region made up of organisations of similar nature will constitute a vital security risk for us. And when we first went into Northern Iraq, there was always the risk of PKK blowing up the place. If we thoroughly consider the risks and substantiate... As the general just said...
Yaşar Güler: Sir, when you were inside a moment ago, we were discussing just that. Openly. I mean, armed forces are a "tool" necessary for you in every turn.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Of course. I always tell the Prime Minister, in your absence, the same thing in academic jargon, you can't stay in those lands without hard power. Without hard power, there can be no soft power.
EIGTH SCREEN
Yaşar Güler: Sir.
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: The national security has been politicised. I don't remember anything like this in Turkish political history. It has become a matter of domestic policy. All talks we've done on defending our lands, our border security, our sovereign lands in there, they've all become a common, cheap domestic policy outfit.
Yaşar Güler: Exactly.
Feridun Siniroğlu: That has never happened before. Unfortunately but...
Yaşar Güler: I mean, do even one of the opposition parties support you in such a high point of national security? Sir, is this a justifiable sense of national security?
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: I don't even remember such a period.
NINTH SCREEN:
Yaşar Güler: In what matter can we be unified, if not a matter of national security of such importance? None.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: The year 2012, we didn't do it 2011. If only we'd took serious action back then, even in the summer of 2012.
Feridun Sinirlioğlu: They were at their lowest back in 2012.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Internally, they were just like Libya. Who comes in and goes from power is not of any importance to us. But some things...
Yaşar Güler: Sir, to avoid any confusion, our need in 2011 was guns and ammo. In 2012, 2013 and today also. We're in the exact same point. We absolutely need to find this and secure that place.
Ahmet Davutoğlu: Guns and ammo are not a big need for that place. Because we couldn't get the human factor in order...
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
The reference to Jobs is due to the observation that he is social media campaign poster-boy, whenever anything goes down that requires image rehabilitation, so that was my humour and expression of cynicism.
Hey, let's swing open those borders to ... unidentified Middle Easterners with stolen passports ...
Note the use of Western intelligentsia indoctrination messaging & double-barrelled finger-wagging propaganda and indoctrination tags:
'racism'
'Islamophobia'
usually symptomatic of:
a) self-serving intelligentsia con-artistry; b) official immigration-shilling; c) unofficial immigration-shilling; d) other hidden agenda shilling; e) Marxist delusion; f) brainwashed stroke-seeking mimicking; g) other delusion (religious, spiritual etc);
all available in several flavours of stupid.
Son
Huffingon Post
Neo-Con Propagandist Campaign
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Daughter
ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
************
consider immigration propaganda
v. informed choice
it's WAR
conquest & imperialreligion
Where did the tide flooding Europe come from?
CIA is behind the early training of what is now a multinational Islamist opposition force that's been trying to bring down the secular and independent Syrian Assad government, since 2011.
There's a number of articles below, discussing Syria and Western and other interference in the region, including the US backing jihadist terrorists under the Reagan administration of the 1980s, giving rise to al-Qaeda and, eventually, ISIS.
The US has sought regime change in Syria since 2006, which is well before the so-called 'civil war' staging began in Syria.
The serial destruction includes: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and the destruction of Yemen at the present, by Saudi Arabia, which has all contributed to the large-scale Middle Eastern and African (largely Muslim) population movement, encouraged, tolerated and enforced by US vassal, Germany, headed by Angela Merkel.
Other anti-Assad players include, the Gulf Arabs (particularly Qatar and Jordan), Turkey and the European Union. I'm pretty sure that Pakistan is also a Saudi pal. Israel, I can't make out. From what I've read, Syria and Iran are the official enemies of Israel, and I believe Israel is still officially at war with Syria.
Egypt is predominantly Sunni, but Egypt is opposed to ISIS, whom it attacked. However, USA reportedly failed to back Egypt's military operation (Feb. 2015):
02.19.155:25 AM ET U.S. Won’t Back Egypt’s Attacks on ISIS
Two longtime allies are attacking ISIS—and growing frustrated with one another. That’s good news for the so-called Islamic State.
The Obama administration was given multiple chances Wednesday to endorse a longtime ally’s airstrikes on America’s biggest enemy at the moment, the so-called Islamic State. Over and over again, Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS. It’s another sign of the growing strain between the United States and Egypt, once one of its closest friends in the Middle East.
This shouldn’t be a complete surprise; Cairo, after all, didn’t tell Washington about its strikes on the ISIS hotbed of Derna, Libya. Still, Wednesday's disconnect was jarring. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest passed on a reporter’s question about an endorsement of Egypt’s growing campaign against ISIS. So did State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.
“We are neither condemning nor condoning” the Egyptian strikes, is all one U.S. official would tell The Daily Beast.
The American empire and its NATO war machine are central to all this murky Middle Eastern activity, I believe, as it is logical that this be the case. On quick check, it appears that NATO is a background force.
As Western powers conduct covert aggression campaigns in the Middle East through intelligence, mercenary and other proxy forces, it appears NATO itself is dormant.
Steps for NATO open warfare Western involvement
1. Article 4
"Article 4 consultation, which would convene the ambassadors of the 28 nations, who are in permanent session in Brussels, to discuss the situation and decide a course of action." [Foreign Policy - link below]
Apparently, Article 4 consultation has already taken place on a previous occasion. In 2014 an article 4 consultation was called under pretext of Islamic State 'attacks' in Turkey.
Following 24/11/2015 Turkish projectile attack and downing of Russian military jet conducting airstrikes against Islamist terrorists in northern Syria, which had reportedly veered into bordering Turkish airspace for a mere 17 seconds, Turkey called a meeting with Turkey's Western / NATO co-conspirators, however it is reported that the meeting was not an Article 4 consultation:
NATO Solidarity with Turkey & ISIS
"Nato expressed solidarity with Turkey after a special meeting of the North Atlantic Council. However, Jens Stoltenberg, Nato secretary-general, urged Moscow and Ankara to exercise calm and avoid escalation.
Turkey’s request for a Nato discussion on Tuesday did not formally invoke an Article 4 emergency meeting, a trigger to consider a threat to its territorial integrity or stability.
Western diplomats said it was too early to say whether the incident would bring an end to greater Russian co-operation in the fight against Isis. But capitals are bracing for Moscow to retaliate, either through economic measures or by more attacks on Turkish-allied opposition groups in Syria."
The aim of consultations under Article 4 is to push for an Article 5 definition of events (any events, including false flag events) as an 'attack' under Article 5, thus 'legitimising' European and North American 'self-defence' measures -- ie, basically 'legitimising' American and allied war on the target:
Article 5
"Article 5 of its founding treaty:
“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked.”
It is worth noting that the only country to ever activate Article 5 was the United States after the 9/11 attacks in 2001."
Source: Foreign Policy Article - Propaganda for War
Turkish, US-NATO / European Union scumbags are defending Islamic terrorists in Syria, because those terrorists are their proxies, attacking the Syrian state in pursuit of regime change that suits the West and its European and regional allies (especially exposed false flag attack plotter, Ghouta sarin attack organiser, gun runner, chemical use trainer and intermediary of al-Qaeda affiliated Islamist 'rebel' Western proxy attackers besieging the hobbled Syrian government).
Turkey aka DADDY-ISIS
Obama Cries
Oft-Cited Defence of Israel by American Empire
Turkey "has the right to defend"
"In a sign that the incident might jeopardise co-operation over Syria, Mr Putin went on to accuse Ankara of supplying finance and military support to jihadist extremists, asking: “Do they want to put Nato at Isis’s service?” “Today’s loss is a stab in the back by the accomplices of terrorism,” a visibly angry Mr Putin told state TV. “We have always treated Turkey as a friendly state. I don’t know in whose interests today’s incident is, but it’s not in ours.” US president Barack Obama said Turkey “has the right to defend its territory and airspace” but also called for both countries to calm down."
Hakan Fidan, Turkey's head of National Intelligence Organization (Turkey), along with Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoğlu (as well as Turkish military), was exposed on audio tape, plotting false flag operation incursions into Syria, to stage an 'attack' on Turkey that would be used as a 'casus belli', or justification for subsequent attack in neighbouring Syria.
It is not entirely clear to me what the objective is, but I believe the objective would be to enable Turkey to stockpile arms to aid a fighting force of 1,000 to be installed among the proxy multinational Islamist forces attempting to bring down Assad's government. Presumably, it would be an opportunity to run arms and military personnel into Syria and to assist on the ground, also?
OBJECTIVE -- was to have USA attack Syria; US had 35 Pentagon attack plans drawn & rejected, because they weren't crippling enough on Syria military, which they want totally destroyed (the after-effect of which will be another Libya: destroyed, years of civil war in a vacuum) - see Seymour Hersh expose -- post here.
Oh, and White House lied. US military sources knew Assad not capable of the sarin attack Ghouta.
CIA & MI6 & Turkey running weapons Libya to Syria via Turkey. US had secret agreement with Turkey re the gun running to al-Qaeda, which is managed by Turkey (the middle man, that's very active in controlling or manipulating the 'rebel' groups (al-Qaeda or other Islamist), and it is Turkey that has arranged the Ghouta chemical attack, having supplied chemicals and having trained the 'rebels', which means hundreds were killed in a staged attack ... At the very least, Americans and British turned a blind eye, as they know the lay of the land in Turkey and Turkey's position (re potential false flag), and were aware al-Qaeda linked militants had access to chemicals via Turkey), so what took place was pretty much anticipated by advisers.
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar bankroll the proxies (ie the 'rebels' militants) in Syria.
Casus belli (Latin)
"An act or event that provokes or is used to justify war"
[wikipedia]
************
Recording of Head of Turkey Intelligence, Hakan Fidan, FM & Military
-->
Discuss False Flag Attack in Syria
TURKISH VERSION
***
Recording Turkey Intelligence Plotting False Flag Attack
As Pretext for American
Attack on Syria
ENGLISH CAPTIONS
***
TURKEY GOVT & INTELLIGENCE FALSE FLAG ATTACK PLOTTING CAPTURED ON AUDIO & LEAKED ON YOUTUBE
Turkey YouTube Ban: Full Transcript of Leaked Syria 'War' Conversation Between Erdogan Officials
Jack Moore
By Jack Moore
March 27, 2014 16:57 GMT
"Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ban of YouTube occurred after a conversation was leaked between Head of Turkish Intelligence Hakan Fidan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu that he wanted removed from the video-sharing website."
Population displacement is a consequence, but I believe the large-scale movement is by design and I note that the International Monetary Fund appears invested in maintaining the gates of Europe open.
Currently there's 7 million Muslims in Germany (single source). That that figure is larger than the entire population of Slovakia, or the populations of Croatia and Bratislava combined -- ie these are European countries.
Hungary currently has in the vicinity of 30,0000 Muslims (over 3,000 of whom are Arabs). This is a surprisingly high number given the speech given by a journalist and Orban supporter, who was determined to close the door to the latest wave of non-European immigration.
These minority population figures tend to vary here and there, depending on source. Expect the figures are also grossly underestimated or understated, judging by the fiddling and deliberate efforts that are made to hide non-European ethnicity re: immigration, reproduction, unemployment and crime.
Above statistical mentions are just figures that I ran into today and the other day.
The German, Swedish, French, Belgian, Italian and British figures are probably at some critical point -- especially the German, Swedish and French.
I'm too lazy to check now, but, from recollection, the stated figures range between 10-15% of various Muslim high-minority rates in European populations. Again, I think that would represent a very conservative figure, because they don't do adequate record keeping (eg make records reflect generational results, crime results etc), and because there's much other honesty in this regard. As the 'guest' populations have larger families, non-Europeans are a faster growing demographic, so reaching the 20% mark cannot be too far off.
Twenty percent non-European foreigners is huge, and I really cannot see how this would be acceptable for Europeans, unless the Europeans are planning on handing over their birthright to the non-European settlers among them.
Large scale non-European immigration to Europe has progressively increased over the post WWII decades, and in the last few years such immigration has substantially stepped up, because of long-term aggression and serial aggression abroad that Americans have generated, producing blanket chaos.
The initial post WWII non-European immigration was for the purpose of economic recovery (or so the story goes).
Immigration has more recently undergone a massive cross-borders movement explosion, that's spanned years of problematic immigration to Italy, from Libya, which was destroyed as result of Western intervention in 2011 (when Gaddafi's assassination was arranged). France was in the thick of this, as well.
Colonel Gaddafi had warned Europe that his state was what kept Europe from being overrun by immigration from Africa. As I understand, Gaddafi was paid by Europe to keep the the flood at bay.
Yikes!!!
Gaddafi warns
of 'al Qaeda threat'
Gaddafi told Turkey's TRT channel that the West only wanted to take action so it could seize control of Libyan oil.
He also claimed that if he stepped down, it would leave a power vacuum to be filled by al-Qaeda:
"We are the ones preventing al-Qaeda from taking control ..." - Gaddafi
" ... they would drag the whole region into chaos."
Gaddafi repeated his accusations that al-Qaeda were the ones fomenting the violence inside Libya.
As many as 6,000 people are estimated to have died since the unrest erupted in mid February [2011].
***
Gaddafi: Wall of Libya that stopped a migration stream to Europe
***
ISIS Threatens to Unleash 500,000 Immigrants into Europe if Attacked in Libya
***
Germany's and the European Union's push may well be in the service of an interested and approving International Monetary Fund, and other organisations like it, who's focus is on expanding the global economy (I think it was), and ensuring European economic integration.
The ONLY concern of IMF (and banker organisations) is for growing profits for bankers, rather than protecting the vital interests of native Europeans.
Given how large, persistent and organised this migration appears to be, I would not be surprised if was a US, EU (and friends) funded and arranged endeavour to force European 'integration', along with social, political and national (sovereign) disintegration that will weaken the native populations' working classes.
On the other hand, this could be a kind of unstoppable Biblical Armageddon exodus from the Middle East and Africa that Europe perhaps cannot stop. I'm thinking along those lines because I'm thinking of Gaddafi's warning and the fact that Europe had to pay Libya to keep south of the border out. On the other hand, if that were the case, it would be insanity not to put a stop to the invasion immediately. Letting it run its course would be letting Europe go under faster rather than slower.
The disaster that Europe has been courting for decades before flinging the gates of Europe open to millions from other continents, could have been avoided. But it wasn't avoided, because the European leaders are indifferent to the costs to native populations and are on a different track to the populations whose interests they are meant to serve.
The displaced persons are a side-effect of war. All these politicians know that. Yet they did not (a) refrain from destruction that causes displacement or (b) make alternative arrangements for the displaced, away from the European continent.
Facts, causes and effects, patterns, consequences, and all manner of statistics and analyses were available to these politicians.
These money-serving, nation destroying politicians have had years in which to make alternative arrangements, instead of imposing mass immigration on domestic populations.
But the politicians and the media spin mass population movement as if it were (a) some accident; (b) some 'crisis,' like a natural disaster; and (c) Europe's obligation.
However, it is not Europe's obligation to destroy European demographics and European culture, or to set in motion the genocide of European man, for the sake of mopping up the American empire's war consequences or for the sake of living up to what are merely 'humanitarian' ideals, divorced of on the ground reality for the host populations that are called to make enormous and enduring sacrifices for outsiders, whose growth in European communities is inevitable and very, very costly to host, beyond monetary terms. It's the social costs that are deadly.
So costly, that I think it is not unreasonable to expect civil war, whether sooner or later.
Of course, the migration is (a) no mere accident; (b) no natural disaster; and (c)Europe's suicidal path cannot be rationally justified.
European and Western politician liars and lowlifes feign 'humanitarian' concern for displaced populations that THEY THEMSELVES HAVE WILFULLY DISPLACED through acts of aggression, conducted in the service of their monied masters (international bankers and multinational corporations), under the same 'humanitarian' pretext.
The 'humanitarian' angle is handy philosophical spin used to justify aggression abroad and to spindoctor theinevitable consequences in the form of large scale population displacement & relocation, as:
(a) the fault of governments targeted by American imperialist aggression (rather than the fault of those that aggress);
(b) the reason to attack the target of American imperialist aggression; and
(c) 'humanitarian concern' of the American empire and its vassals and hatchet-men, even as they subject their domestic populations to:
enduring debt, displacement, diminished amenities, diminished services, competition for their own resources, diminished and deminishing demographic, diminished political power, polarisation, danger, death, knife attacks, rape, rape and more rape (even guys are getting raped: the imperialist Libyan solder project gone wrong - Libyan soldiers rape British man and go on drunken rampage, to the tune of £500,000 - here), gang rapes galore (esp. Sweden), assaults, death threats, intimidation, assassinations, political suppression and general oppression in matters of freedom of expression and freedom of speech (think of the effects of artists in hiding because of death threats, Charlie Hebdo murders, murdered Dutch film-maker, Theo van Gogh -- people speak of a 'chilling effect' on this and that: it doesn't get any more chilling than being carved up on the street in broad daylight); speaking of which, there's the various murders (mother and son broad daylight IKEA murder Sweden, by Africans; the London broad daylight hacking murder of Lee Rigby by Nigerians); violent protests, no-go zones, race riots, enclave riots, destruction of property and the potential for same. This isn't an exhaustive list: it's just some of what comes to mind when considering the mandated social experiment, which is, in reality, simply the attendant cost of empire building and expansion -- the cost of being vassal of the warring & profiteering masters of the American empire.
Then there is the massive, totalitarian surveillance,political policing and the militarised police state, that robs the domestic populations of civil liberties and acquires its powers, largely from the risks that the said state imports, via its wars of aggression abroad, the resulting displacement and mass population transfer allotted between the henchmen of the American empire.
It is the rotting fruit of costly, taxpayer funded aggression abroad, pursed on behalf of the elite few, for rewards that are gained by the same elite few, at the expense of the taxed and burdened many, who not only pay, but also pay for the 'privilege' of being displaced, assaulted, intimidated, raped, slaughtered and eventually biologically erased, as has been set in motion by mass population transfer and its consequences.
After decades of propaganda from Western intelligentsia generally, academia, government, interest groups, media (which is has very broad reach and influence & is a carrier of messages, 'cultural' messages, accepted values, ideology etc), the Western public has been indoctrinated to accept idealist philosophical notions of 'Western values', universalism, globalism, relativism, egalitarianism, 'democracy', liberalism and so forth, at the expense of retention of identity, tradition, culture, nationalism and birthright (among many more core aspects of group identity), which is at risk but has been downplayed, discouraged, dismissed, disparaged etc, creating docile subjects for what appears to be an economic and social experiment conducted by the American empire and its vassals -- but is no experiment at all: it is merely an outcome and strategy of American empire building and profiteering, that shall manifest the destruction of Europe, the homeland of Europeans, and in the genocide of the European peoples.
It is as if the select among the intelligentsia, academia and media have become new Church and nobility, while the object of worship is a new Christ (victim): the 'human' species.
1. the new clergy & new nobility: intelligentsia. 2. the new 'Christ': man & his idealised rights. 3. the new doctrine: liberalism and relativism.
Or something like that. Ideas might need developing (or discarding, lol).
While manipulating public perception and opinion, ostensibly advocating on behalf of displaced populations, politicians do so having spent taxpayer money on generating this displaced demographic through war -- war that is waged in the interests of the few, paid for by the many who are the producers, consumers and taxpayers (and therefore the economy).
Having imposed the burden of war debt on the non decision-making and powerless taxpayer, the politician will shamelessly urge his nation to surrender its homogeneity (or primacy) and its heritage. But national heritage cannot rightfully be surrendered or assigned by anyone - it is inherited from ancestors and borne by blood. Therefore, the people of Europe are being displaced and supplanted on the soil of their ancestors.
As for migration generally, check out a couple of examples (below) of shameless hypocrisy from VP Biden, whose government has created what the politicians and the media are calling 'Syrian refugees' (in fact, immigrants from all over the Middle East and Africa, some of whom are economic migrants, converging on Europe to take advantage of the open invitation, undefended borders and generous state support, particularly the offerings of Germany's Merkel.
Politicians play on people's feelings and let boatload after boatload over the border for supposedly 'humanitarian' reasons, although these politicians never display anything remotely resembling humanitarian consideration or conduct on the domestic front.
The great Western regime change quest that's spanned at least 14 years now (in Afghanistan alone) has therefore produced 14 years outflow of immigration from that location to Western and European communities, but what of the costs, inevitable consequences and the risks of mass population movement imposed on economically enslaved, impotent and politically hobbled domestic populations, decade after decade?
Check out Biden's emotive spin and feigned concern for orphans, children, women, survivors of 'torture' and people desperate for medical help.
Oh, please. We've seen a series of Middle Eastern and African American empire invasions and corresponding Middle Eastern and African invasions of Europe, by mostly aggressive, able-bodied young men, so spare us the tear-jerking tales of orphans (orphaned-by-USA) ... but farmed off to vassal Europe for years now, while America was tossing their allotment back in the 'sea' like undersized fish (I'm not kidding -- the Americans would opt for a minuscule intake that would be pared down to next to nothing, after they reject those they don't want on 'national security grounds', I believe it was. Fair enough. But what of Europe, does Europe not have the same rights as the Americans and, if so, why has Europe not exercised those rights, particularly following the American caused financial meltdown and the fall-out from that, as well as austerity measures?
What Europe is doing does not add up. And the contradictions do not make sense -- eg. deliberate population movement (population movement by design) or: invasion that Europe is unable to stop (and if so, why?).
NOTE
Mass migratory invasion of Europe possibly also explained by the following -- ie. in terms of strategic depopulation of a region as a war weapon and/or strategic forced displacement as an instrument of coercion on Europe (ie an instrument of war), used against Europe by the declared Islamic Caliphate -- in which case the Western propaganda, acceptance of invasion and failure to secure boundaries makes warped 'sense':
Elites and their puppet governments expect you, the European taxpayer, to pay for this and to take onerous social consequences on-board -- irrespective of the immense costs beyond material costs.
There's an article below that refers to the bombings that France has been involved in in Africa, which would partly explain the droves of Africans on European soil.
#France - 8,000 military personnel stationed abroad
3,000 in Operation Barkhane (vs Islamist) in
Mali
Chad
Niger
Mauritania
Burkina Faso
15 Oct 2014
Immigrants entering Europe would do so on the basis of varying degrees of danger, poverty and conditions of chaos in their homelands.
By the look of the above list (which is not a definitive list of African actions), Africa is probably in as much disarray as the Middle East.
However, what the European elites do is not the collective responsibility of the European people.
The European public is not collectively culpable for creating those conditions abroad that corporate-serving politicians pursue and manifest.
Even if one argued that Europeans are collectively responsible for the actions of politicians and elites they do not control, no European can rationally be expected or obliged to commit what amounts to collective European suicide by way of mass migration intake.
COMMENT
If the above comments are rambling and unclear, I blame it on my usual inability to compose ... as well as a marathon spell of not having slept. Too tired to properly focus.
The above are just thoughts I have on the subject and I realise the ideas I have are not those of the liberal left or of the authorities (and their class of messengers) promoting liberalism, globalism, open borders and so on.
The ideas I have are influenced by a feeling component and the feeling is strongly in favour of what I consider European interests.
The progressive converts who worship at the altar of the Cult of Mankind (the species) at the centre of the religion of the American Empire, corresponding with the empire's expanding global, military and trade ambitions, will no doubt find my take on things 'regressive'.
But is there a truth, an absolute objective truth in matters such as this? I say no. Your constructs are not my constructs and they cannot be, because your constructs, ideals and principles are not universally applicable.
Truth, in terms of broad principles, ideals, values etc (abstract things as opposed to concrete things, I guess), is just where you are inclined to stand, and that depends on many things.
Politically 'supporting', to the extent of having some interest or sympathy for various peoples abroad, does not translate, for me, to welcoming or accepting the end of Europe as the homeland of European peoples, or acceptance of decline of European demographics and the plunder of European historical, cultural, political and other resources.
Anglo-Saxon / European demographics, dress, customs, sights and sounds are my comfort zone, and to state the obvious: proximity to overwhelming foreign demographics, foreign enclaves, no-go zones, foreign religious structures, religiosity, and non-Western religiously symbolic attire, is not within the comprehension or comfort zone.
Being engulfed doesn't make sense, when this is not what one was born for or what one may have 'signed up' for, as would be the case, for example, by perhaps choosing to relocate to live in completely different environmental, biological and cultural surroundings.
The large numbers of attacks on women in Europe, horrific types of crimes (such as the honour killings of daughters), horrific daylight murder of Dutch film-maker and others mentioned above, Nordic artists in hiding from non-Europeans in their ancestors' homelands and under police protection (death threats), various rapes, gang rapes, assaults and murders, and the periodic murderous attacks on Westerners (eg Lee Rigby, Charlie Hebdo and Paris) that accompanying European displacement and so much more, are but a few steps on the passive, silent, sleepwalk towards certain European extinction.
All of the above produce the experience of strong and unpleasant dissonance, due to the combination of opposing attitudes: curiosity, interest, a degree of 'support' in relation to some events abroad, albeit on a shallow level (like supporting a sports team) and in a compartmentalised way, that's hard to explain. On a primal, emotional level, however, there's an inability to accept Europe as anything but European. In turn, support of things non-European, on an intellectual, compartmentalised and sort of arm's length way, is rendered hollow by emotions that emerge in relation to events in Europe.
*Excuse typos, I've got to crash ... + excuse the weirdness of my posts. lol I like to throw in whatever comes to mind and to hand, at the time of composing a post.
Ready to launch ... this is it! ;)
it's WAR
Biden's Hypocrisy & Propaganda
1. Aggress: engage in economic sanctions,
covert infiltration & destabilisation,
sponsor proxy wars,
pursue regime change,
execute 'goodwill' bombings abroad,
if not engage in open, declared war,
in pursuit of American corporate empire hegemonic & profit-making agenda aims
2. burden & displace
local populations of target, as side-effect
3. use 'humanitarian' pretext to seek open war
4. use 'humanitarian' propaganda
to feign humanitarian 'concern'
- as justification & disguise
5. use 'humanitarian' propaganda
to urge indoctrinated & passive domestic populations to accept responsibility for foreign mass movement generated by American empire aggression manifestingthevery movement
of war target populations
6. spend taxpayer money
(or lock taxpayer into national debt to bankers)
for wars abroad that benefit the few,
& pass it off to the many that pay,
as 'national security'
7. spend taxpayer money
(or lock taxpayer into national debt to bankers)
on shifting side-effect non-European war target populations
onto European soil,
for wars waged abroad for benefit of few,
& pass it off to the many that pay dearly,
as 'humanitarian' and an 'obligation'
8. serially destroy war targets
for masters of American empire, selling mercantile American empire profit-making agenda as Imperial Religion humanitarianism, liberalism, democracy & universalism. it's WAR
9. destroy European demographics & culture,
& pave the way to genocide of European man
on both European soil
& in European societies,
via mass non-European war target human displacement & movement,
as result of American empire
pursuit of profit-making aims of the few,
to the detriment of the many
Vast majority of 'refugees' aren't Syrian
Stolen passports, forged passports
discarded documentation
'Syrian refugees' media and social media handle was probably chosen in order to:
(a) personaliseand therefore 'sell', a massive Biblical column of people marching onto Europe from the cradle of civilisation;
(b) to sidestep Western explanation (& accountability) ... eg. the West has been instrumental in helping cause widespread destruction and chaos over two continents;
before progressing to further the long-termproject aimed at destroying Europe with war & profit target human exodus strategic absorption.
it's WAR
Biden's Spin
Biden's Spin
Joe Biden's
Hey, Watch Me Shift entire population
of the Middle East & Africa to Europe
Sleight of Hand
assertion
of playing into terrorists' hands
bymaintaining national borders firmly in place is more deception
it's WAR
the mass migration transfer is either:
1. strategic depopulation of multiple war targets' populations by invitation of Angela Merkel & the European Union which does not ring true nor does tent cities in European winter etc.
It does not make sense to strategically
depopulate multiple nations,
but populations of multiple nations
are flooding Europe,
at the rate of MILLIONS
the West surely cannot be that desperate for a Syria win
no matter what the stakes OR
2. Islamic Statemade good their threat to flood Europe withhuman war weapons involving strategic/engineered mass migration threatened or forced upon an opponent in war, as a coercive or otherwise damaging measure inflicted on the other side (Europe, in this case)
OR
3. this is some evil banker / IMF plot for European integration into global markets & banker profits ... but, while this sounds plausible, when you read IMF representatives promoting the third world invasion of Europe, it does not hold when Europe is subject to austerity and when something like 50% of those in Spain are unemployed.
************
Tentative Conclusion
Best bet: Islamic State
(and whoever is connected with Islamic State)
is flooding Europe
by facilitating passage
or
maybe George Soros & Islamic State have done a deal ... ;)
************
Humorous
( kinda ... )
song worth thinking about in critical, class struggle terms:
But not as much, if you consider that voices of ordinary people weigh less and are routinely suppressed, diminished, dismissed, and ridiculed by zealots of oneness and liberalism, who claim to fight fascism ... (while employing the religiously fevered liberal-left form of fascism, when not employing lunatic terror and violence tactics to deny others of democratic rights -- eg in Sweden).
"IT'S THE PEOPLE'S VOICE CRUSADERS FIGHTING POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. TALKBACK GODS REVEAL THE TRUTH CALL US NOW AND SPIT OUT THE VENOM FROM STRUGGLE ST"
[I've no idea what the Alan Jones talk-show is about (although I've quickly checked out the Parrot video where he swears heaps).
Expect he makes a song and dance about some issue or other on radio, because he's a showman aiming for controversy and ratings. Bet the liberal left consider the topics of discussion 'blasphemous.' ... lol]
❤
************
Dennis Aubrey Sings a Song for Julian Assange (Woody Guthrie)
************
[List below is not a complete overview, it is merely some of what I've read; most of which I've probably forgotten by now]
Articles
#ISIS #Syria Reagan era USA is responsible for reviving jihad CIA recruiting worldwide for jihad
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Over 160 ARMS cargo
FLIGHTS to Syria rebels
most from Qatar + Saudi Arabia
/ to Turkey & Jordan since Jan 2012
Croatia sold arms to Saudi Arabia,
which were funnelled to
terrorists in Syria via Jordan
Link | here
Archive #Syria
Turkey
sponsoring al-Qaeda & ISIS
>US military aid to “moderate” rebels coordinated in Turkey
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
#Turkey wants to depose #Assad
& is OK with ISIS extremists
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
PROPAGANDA ... Oooooooo, la, la
Spanning Both Sides of Atlantic
Bernard Henri Levy
'Why Obama and Hollande are right on Syria'
ENGLISH
Link | here
---------------------- ꕤ ----------------------
Nafeez Ahmed
#Russia #Syria #Turkey
NATO is harbouring the Islamic State
Turks caught supplying al-Qaeda proxies Syria
Link | here
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
