Australia - Austraian Defence Force - Twitter PsyOps, Cultural Marxism, Ideological Wars & Censorship

ꕤ Twitter PsyOps  [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] SOURCE http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/mona-shindy-case-defence-impartiality-caught-in-a-twitter-trap/news-story/54a5bed01d0df3425e3c6d5f761d60e2 Australia - Austraian Defence Force - Twitter PsyOps, Cultural Marxism, Ideological Wars & Censorship http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/mona-shindy-case-defence-impartiality-caught-in-a-twitter-trap/news-story/54a5bed01d0df3425e3c6d5f761d60e2 Mona Shindy case: Defence impartiality caught in a Twitter trap     The Australian     January 9, 2016 12:00AM     Leo Shanahan     Reporter, Sydney Zimbabwean Muslim cleric Mufti Ismail Menk runs a kind of benign Twitter account that projects a “can’t we just all get along” schtick appealing to Western sensibilities. Menk tweets out statements such as: “Learn to make the most of each day. Once over, it’ll never return. So be wary of what you put in a day. Fill it with good deeds & kindness.” No doubt it was with such sentiments in mind that Captain Mona Shindy, the navy’s most senior Muslim officer and the naval chief strategic adviser on Islamic affairs, at one stage describing him as “a source of wisdom”, retweeted Menk’s advice not to get “rude abusive or insulting”. More discreet are his views on homosexuals, whom he calls “filthy”. A recent tour of British universities was abandoned after videos of sermons surfaced in which Menk claimed gays “are worse than animals”. There is no suggestion Shindy endorses Menk’s views on gays, but it neatly illustrates the trap of social media for a member of the Australian Defence Force. Shindy’s Twitter account @navyislamic was shut down by Chief of Navy Tim Barrett in December after tweets endorsed the Australian Grand Mufti’s response to the Paris terror attacks, made gibes at Tony Abbott and questioned Australian foreign policy in Iraq. The social media and political activities policy of the ADF demands strict political neutrality from members when commenting in a capacity identifying them as ADF employees.  [comment:  no such thing as 'strict political neutrality' -- even benign schtick & infomercial messaging IS POLITICAL & IDEOLOGICAL dissemination / influence / opinion shaping] How does an organisation that has to be absolutely neutral in its political positioning exist in the politically febrile world of social media? How do you engage in identity politics, creating positions such as “Islamic cultural adviser” that almost by their nature attract political comment, without endangering the impartiality of the officer or the ADF?  [comment:  'impartiality' -- got to be kidding -- position itself is indicative of political state messaging role]   The position of Islamic cultural adviser was established in 2013 by Barrett’s predecessor Ray Griggs. According to the navy, “the position … was established to help improve Navy’s understanding of the cultural issues of the many Muslim navies/nations that it operates with … Capt Shindy also provides advice on how Navy can become a more attractive employer from an Islamic perspective as part of our broader diversity approach.” At the end of last year, the ADF had 103 permanent members who identified as Muslim, 26 of them in the navy. Rodger Shanahan (no relation), a research fellow at the Lowy Institute and a former army officer, believes Shindy clearly crossed the line of what is acceptable political comment from an ADF officer. “She showed poor judgment, stepped over the line and should’ve known better,” he tells The Weekend Australian. He believes the Twitter controversy points to problems the ADF faces in its determination to have a social media presence. “The military is not really allowed to enter into” all the “meaty stuff that makes social media ­interesting and dynamic”, Shanahan says, so “it almost becomes an infomercial”. The second problem is the nebulous nature of Shindy’s role as an Islamic cultural adviser. Shanahan says defence forces can only “be concerned with operational not social outcomes” and it’s unclear what operational benefit is being provided by the role. He claims the ADF would be better off following a US model of employing foreign area officers, who can be of any religion but trained in particular geographic areas to offer cultural advice. Neil James, executive director of the Australia Defence Association, says the ADF needs a diversity policy in the interests of a representative workforce, but the Islamic cultural advisory role has failed. “I think the experiment of an Islamic cultural adviser hasn’t worked. They do have indigenous cultural advisers and they do work, but they are advising on culture largely and not religion. In this case they did not have a definition of what a cultural adviser actually did.” Another problem, says James, are the inconsistencies in the ADF crackdowns for breaches of its social media and political commentary policies. “One of the problems they have had is that what you might loosely call the right-wing commentators have been punished and what you might call left-wing commentators haven’t been.” He also says the navy’s excuse for closing the @navyislamic account — that it was attracting “contentious comments” — was disingenuous given that many would regard Shindy’s comments as contentious. “You have comments on a navy website which a lot of people would consider an apologia for Islamist terrorism,” James says. While accepting the Shindy case is very different from that of Bernard Gaynor — who was sacked for making a statement about military marching in Sydney’s Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras — experts and former ADF members accept it puts the ADF in a bind over what is considered acceptable political commentary. The ADF is appealing Gaynor’s recent victory in the Federal Court, which found his decommissioning was invalid on the grounds his comment was made as a private citizen and was protected under the implied right to political communication. Gaynor has been a long-time critic of Shindy and transgender Group Captain Cate McGregor. He was crowing this week that the removal of the @navyislamic feed was a victory for him and the Australian Liberty Alliance. It may be galling for it to be lectured by Gaynor, but when the ADF chooses to navigate the minefield of social media and identity politics, allies can just as easily turn out to be enemies. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/mona-shindy-case-defence-impartiality-caught-in-a-twitter-trap/news-story/54a5bed01d0df3425e3c6d5f761d60e2 ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT NOTE - follow up U.S.A. STATE STASI PROPAGANDA - 'FOREIGN' MODEL  [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] Found my first Aussie state Twitter PsyOps. Aussie State Stasi at work right here. Need to think about this before concluding what I think overall.  But I tend to be as opposed to state propaganda as I am to state (and corporate media / social media platform) censorship. Setting it aside for the moment. Lowy Institute is just another state Stasi ideology & corporate propaganda echo chamber (retail magnate / corporate established), so anything they have to offer in this or any other debate  is automatically suspect. Lowy Institute Australia's leading foreign affairs think-tank objective:  to influence Australian foreign policy Lowy Institute established 2003 with a gift from Frank Lowy AC  [think-tank 'trojan' ... lol] Frank Lowy Chairman of Westfield Corporation global shopping centre co. US$29.3 billion of assets USA, UK & Europe Chairman of Scentre Group Scentre Group ASX listed created 2014 when Westfield separated USA & European business from operations in Australia & New Zealand ownership development design construction funds/asset management property management leasing marketing activities for Westfield centres 2015 - assets under management:  A$39.4 billion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scentre_Group Frank Lowy b. Czechoslovakia (now Slovakia) lived in Budapest, Hungary WWII caught en route to British Mandate of Palestine deported by British to camp in Cyprus Lowy joined the Haganah (then Golani Brigade) active in:   Arab–Israeli War in the Galilee & Gaza 1952 - left Israel joins family in Australia starts small-goods delivery business 1953 - hook-up with fellow immigrant John Sanders partner with Sanders --> found Westfield Devel. Corp. develop shopping centre Sydney west, Blacktown Reserve Bank of Australia Lowy appointed Director:  1995, 2000, 2003 (term end 2005) US Senate probe & Aust. Tax Office audit re:   tax havens in Liechtenstein & Switzerland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lowy Haganah Zionist military organisation representing Jews in Palestine from 1920 to 1948 under the influence of Histadrut (“General Federation of Labour”) outlawed by British Mandatory authorities initially reportedly opposed politics & terrorist activities of Irgun Zvai Leumi & the Stern Gang However:  1941, a full-time commando force, the Palmach Hebrew acronym:  Pluggot Machatz, “Shock Companies”) was organised Post WWII when British refuse to open Palestine to unlimited Jewish immigration Haganah resorts to terrorist activities: bombing bridges, rail lines, and ships used to deport illegal Jewish immigrants 1947 - United Nations resolution to partition Palestine Haganah the terrorist org becomes the defence force of Jewish state clashed openly with British forces defeated Palestinian Arabs & allies 1948 - creation of state of Israel Haganah controlled: most of the settled areas allocated to Israel plus:   Arab cities eg, ʿAkko (Acre) & Yafo (Jaffa) May 31, 1948 - Haganah disbanded as private org by Israel provisional govt -->  it then became the national army of the state: name perpetuated in official name of Israeli armed forces: Tzva Haganah le-Yisraʾel (“Israel Defense Forces”) http://www.britannica.com/topic/Haganah 1946 - Bombing of King David Hotel, Jerusalm British admin HQ for Palestine 91 (various nationalities) killed & 46 injured by militant Zionist underground org Igrun plan finalised between Amichai Paglin (Irgun alias 'Gidi') Chief of Ops of the Irgun +  Itzhak Sadeh, commander of the Palmach bombing of King David Hotel, Jerusalem approved by Moshe Sneh, chief of the Haganah General HQ in 1946 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing   Lowy Institute Australia's leading foreign affairs think-tank objective:  to influence Australian foreign policy established in 2003 with a gift from Frank Lowy AC  [think-tank 'trojan' ... lol]     International Security     East Asia     G20 Studies Centre     Melanesia     Polling     International Economy     West Asia offers publications for free download regular talks began to be recorded available on website 2007 - launched a blog 'The Interpreter' Board of directors Ambassador Chan Heng Chee DUBC – former Singaporean ambassador to USA David Gonski Robert Ferguson – former managing director, Bankers Trust Australia Martin Indyk – diplomat; former United States ambassador to Israel Frank Lowy – Lowy Institute founder and chairman; co-founder, Westfield Group Peter Lowy – group managing director of the Westfield Group Steven Lowy – group managing director of the Westfield Group Ian Macfarlane – former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia Mark Ryan – company director Judith Sloan – economist Michael Thawley – former Australian Ambassador to the United States Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC, DFC – former Chief of the Australian Defence Force The Hon. James Spigelman AC - Aust. Broadcasting Corp. Chair     James Spigelman former Chief Justice NSW Supreme Court 1998-2012 2012 - Chair Aust. Broadcasting Corp. - 5-year term Thus:  incumbent ABC Chair Court Final Appeal Hong Kong (2013) b. Poland 1946 served as Sen. Advisor & Principal Pvt Sec. to PM Gough Whitlam 1975 - appointed Sec. of Dept. of the Media member Aust. Law Reform Commission former Queens Counsel Appointed Chief Justice by NSW Prem. Bob Carr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Spigelman Notable staff Michael Fullilove, Executive Director and Director of the Global Issues Program Rory Medcalf, Director International Security Program James Brown, Military Fellow Alan Dupont, Non-Resident Fellow   Former staff Allan Gyngell, Executive Director (2004–2009) - subsequently Director General of the Office of National Assessments [spy agency] Michael Wesley, Executive Director (2009-2012) Mark Thirlwell, Director International Economy Program (2004-2013) REPORTS - Quickie insight into agenda: New Voices 2004     Australia's transforming borders New Voices 2005     Binding the World Together New Voices 2006     Technology and International Relations New Voices 2007     International Leadership New Voices 2008     Responsibility in a Globalised World New Voices 2009     Networked New Voices 2010     Global Encounters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowy_Institute_for_International_Policy Dr. Michael Fullilove executive director Lowy Institute for International Policy Rhodes Scholar University of Oxford MA & PhD International Relations worked as a visiting fellow at Brookings Institution in Washington, DC former adviser:  Australia PM Paul Keating remains:   nonresident senior fellow at Brookings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fullilove Reserve Bank of Australia est.  Reserve Bank of Australia Australia's central bank & banknote issuing authority Reserve Bank Act (1959) removed central banking functions from Commonwealth Bank Components: Payments System Board governs the payments system policy of Reserve Bank Reserve Bank Board controls:  all other monetary & banking policies of bank board composition: * Treasury & other Aust. govt agencies * civil leaders of economy structure consistent since 1951 Governor {appointed by: Treasurer} chairs: 1. Payment Systems Board 2. Reserve Bank Board DISAGREEMENT between  board Payment Systems &  board Reserve Bank = resolved by Governor 1911 - est. Commonwealth Bank without authority to print notes {only Treasury could do so} movement to re-establishing gold standard post WWI 1925 - gold standard for British pound sterling & Australian pound Great Depression (1929-late 1930s) -- Australian pound devalued -- below value of pound sterling Commonwealth Bank Act (1932) -- Aust pound sterling departs from gold standard 1945 - private banks regulated by legislation -- opposed by HC Coombs -- Coombs pro flexible interest rate -- allowing bank to rely on open market ops -- tap system issue of bank bonds (ie price set) -- altered 1980 to short term (13 wk & 25 wk) tender -- volume of stock set but price determined by market -- tender system extended, soon after, to longer term govt bonds 1983 - float of Australian dollar --  financial system in Australia deregulated 1998 - admin of banks -- transferred from the Commonwealth Bank to:     - Aust. Prudential Regulation Authority     - Payments System Board (created)     - bank granted power in board same year Current Governor of Reserve bank:  Glenn Stevens appointed:  2006 b. Sydney 1958 Sydney University, BA Economics University of Western Ontario, MA professing Christian, Baptist church long-time:  Sutherland Shire southern region of Sydney, NSW council predominantly Liberal 2011 - Anglo-Saxon (72%) Shire: home to Westfield Miranda 'Miranda Fair' & others https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutherland_Shire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Stevens *partial summary Reserve Bank ꕤ

TWITTER STASI - CENSORSHIP RAPE - 'Twitter Unverifies Writer Amid Speech Wars' & CIA, TWITTER, BUZZFEED & WESTERN INTELLIGENTSIA WIDER WAR ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH

ꕤ Twitter Stasi [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] SOURCE http://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/twitter-unverifies-milo-yiannopoulos-leading-to-speech-polic#.aqDv3eO8Q WIDER WAR - WESTERN STATE, MSM, & INTELLIGENTSIA WAR ON (A) DEFINITION & (B) PERCEPTION OF REALITY BUZZFEED Twitter Unverifies Writer Amid Speech Wars The company won’t explain the removal of Milo Yiannopoulos’s verification badge. A campaign against harassment, and allegations of speech policing. posted on Jan. 10, 2016, at 9:46 a.m. Twitter’s removal of journalist and provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos’s verification badge for unspecified rules violations has pushed the company — in the midst of a crackdown on harassment — deeper into the politicized battle over online speech. Though Yiannopoulos is still on the platform, the self-described supervillain is widely impersonated and the loss of the verification badge could well make it difficult for him to distribute his message on Twitter. “The primary purpose of verification is to combat impersonation,” Yiannopoulos told BuzzFeed News in an email. “I can’t think of anyone on the internet more impersonated (whether out of affection or otherwise) than me.” One possible Yiannopoulos violation: a top Twitter executive suggested it was for a Tweet containing the phrase: “You deserve to be harassed.” The executive, Head of Commerce Nathan Hubbard, said he wasn’t speaking for the company. And Twitter, citing a policy of not commenting on individual accounts, declined to comment. But it confirmed that a letter notifying Yiannopoulos of the verification revocation (cited in the tweet below) is real. This isn’t Twitter’s first battle with a member of the populist right-wing media. It banned the journalist Chuck Johnson last May for rules violations. “They’re using a tool for establishing the identity of prominent people as an ideological weapon,” Yiannopoulos wrote in an email. “Any one of you could be next — you know how the Left loves to turn on its allies!” It is unclear which rule (or rules) Yiannopoulos violated, and Twitter will not provide any additional detail on which infractions led to his verification removal. Social platforms are corporations, and aren’t bound by the First Amendment. But their decisions matter since much of the political discussion that once took place in the open web is now occurring within their walls. And discussions that do take place outside social platforms still often rely on social for distribution. Limiting someone’s ability to message on Twitter therefore has real impact. Johnson, for instance, has essentially vanished from the political conversation since he was banned. Facebook has dealt with similar issues. Donald Trump, for instance, recently made statements that appear to be in violation of the company’s hate speech policies, yet Trump remains active on the platform.  [comment:  'hate speech' laws & ensuing corporate policies are CENSORSHIP & POLITICAL SUPPRESSION tools] “When we review reports of content that may violate our policies, we take context into consideration,” a Facebook spokesperson told BuzzFeed News at the time. “That context can include the value of political discourse.” The lack of specificity from Twitter prompted a wave of criticism under the hashtag #jesuismilo (a reference to French journalists who lost more than a blue check mark) and a pointed Tweetstorm from investor Jason Calacanis. Hubbard, the Twitter commerce executive, suggested this exchange might have prompted the company’s move: TOKYO ROSE EDIT   [*** insert paid/professional and/or associated 'feminist' intelligentsia social media messaging drivel, typical attack on freedom of speech aimed to suppress other political voices ***] Of course, Twitter verification badges simply make you a member of a large, modestly exclusive club. The badge’s removal has given Yiannopoulos a different kind of status. “If Twitter wanted to delegitimise or marginalise me this was EXACTLY the wrong thing to do,” he wrote in an email. “They probably thought it would be less of a drama than banning me for my terrible, off-reservation, how-can-a-gay-guy-possibly-say-this opinions. Actually, I’ve had nearly 5,000 new followers in a day, I’ve got speaking requests coming out of my ears and I’m turning into a free speech martyr despite not really losing anything. Free speech is something that all but the most strident cultural authoritarians can get behind, which is why comedians, journalists etc from across the spectrum are lining up to complain about it.” Yiannopoulos has also been critical of BuzzFeed News, and of a recent article that cast him as a central figure in a dark new internet counterculture. In one recent stunt, he changed his biography to describe himself as BuzzFeed’s “social justice editor.” He was subsequently briefly suspended from Twitter, and returned with that description removed from his bio. But a Twitter official said the removal of the verification badge is not connected to that incident. Additional reporting by Joseph Bernstein Alex Kantrowitz is a senior technology reporter for BuzzFeed News and is based in San Francisco. He reports on social and communications. Contact Alex Kantrowitz at alex.kantrowitz@buzzfeed.com. http://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/twitter-unverifies-milo-yiannopoulos-leading-to-speech-polic#.aqDv3eO8Q Britain: Feminist Intelligentsia Hypocrisy Serves Corrupt State Powers LINK | Post ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT - 'TRIGGER WARNING' Got a raging hate-on for Twitter Stasi, in particular, and for the 'social justice'  shield-as-a-blunt-instrument-of-suppression and sundry other cultural Marxism evangelising and CIA cut-out smear & disinformation PsyOps merchants, media & social media clowns, embedded clowns, & platforms, at the moment. Twitter Head of Commerce Nathan Hubbard can suck my inverted commas d*ck. Pack of CIA-serving censoring & privacy raping Twitter & CORPORATE MEDIA assh*les. Buzzfeed 'news' are a pack of  assh*les publishing state and corporate serving propaganda (ref:  Buzzfeed CIA PsyOps assault on WikiLeaks publisher, Julian Assange, & on Ecuador, who have (rightfully) granted the Australian journalist POLITICAL ASYLUM) -- so who cares what they (and their various corporate associates) have to say to smear dissenting voices & figures who challenge the CURRENT WORLD ORDER CORRUPT POWERS that wage ILLEGAL INVASIONS & WARS, commit WAR CRIMES, kill civilians WHOLESALE & otherwise WREAK DESTRUCTION & INJUSTICE ACROSS THE GLOBE, in service of their Anglo-American banking & corporate masters. This ideological assault & censorship is wider CIA, Twitter, Buzzfeed (& associated corporate media) & Western intelligentsia war on FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, FREEDOM OF THOUGHT (IDEOLOGICAL FREEDOM) & POLITICAL FREEDOM. ꕤ

Sweden Takes Five (5) Years to Agree to Question Assange

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=2401729&CategoryId=14089 Sweden Takes Five (5) Years to Agree to Question Assange Latin American Herald Tribune http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=2401729&CategoryId=14089 Ecuador, Sweden Sign Deal to Enable Questioning of Assange Caracas,Saturday January 9,2016 QUITO – Ecuador and Sweden have signed an agreement that will enable Swedish prosecutors to question WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at Ecuador’s embassy in London, the Andean nation said Friday. Negotiations began in June and the agreement was reached on Thursday, Ecuador’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement, adding that it will enter into force “in the coming days.” Sweden wants to question Assange on a rape allegation dating back to 2010. Assange, an Australian citizen, sought refuge at the Ecuadorian mission in June 2012 after losing a long battle in the British courts to avoid extradition to Sweden. Assange, who denies the accusations, has said that once he is in Swedish custody, U.S. prosecutors will indict him for espionage and Washington will pressure Stockholm into handing him over. Politicians and pundits in the United States called for Assange to be prosecuted – or even assassinated – after WikiLeaks disseminated thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables as well as a video that showed an American military helicopter crew killing a Reuters photographer and several other civilians in Iraq. The agreement on legal assistance in criminal matters is “undoubtedly an instrument that strengthens bilateral relations and will facilitate, for example, compliance with court proceedings, such as the questioning of Mr. Assange,” the ministry said. The statute of limitations on unlawful coercion and sexual molestation allegations against Assange expired in August. But a fourth accusation of rape, which like the others stemmed from Assange’s encounters with two women in Sweden in 2010, will not expire until 2020. http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=2401729&CategoryId=14089 NOTE    [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.  [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. SOURCE | here James D. Caitlin LINK | here ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT The misinformed detractor who recently trolled me, declaring that Assange isn't an Australian citizen might want to take note of the Latin American Herald Tribune confirmation that he is. It's worthwhile examining the statements made by Assange's legal defence back in 2010 (above), seeing the article recites the laundry list of allegations made by the Swedish authorities against Assange -- the same Swedish authorities who failed to follow police protocols & tampered with the police database. Key additional information puts those allegations into perspective. Sweden was advised by the British Crown Prosecution Service, NOT to question Assange in Britain.  [CLICK image for clarity / enlargement] ꕤ COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. For its part, Sweden has followed that strategic course over the last FIVE (5) YEARS that Assange has, as a result, been detained without charge. Sweden has done its utmost NOT to interview Assange in Britain, thereby denying Assange the opportunity to defend against allegations that Sweden is seeking to rely upon to extradite Assange to Sweden, on behalf of the US. A US Grand Jury (ie court empowered to decide whether to try American federal and capital crime (death penalty, espionage & other) cases), has: already issued a sealed indictment (formal legal accusation) against Assange, as at January 2011 (here). Crown Prosecution Service Our values We will be independent and fair We will prosecute independently, without bias and will seek to deliver justice in every case. LINK | here [ comment:  political persecution of Julian Assange being the EXCEPTION to this grand British justice statement of values and intent ] ꕤ

Off Topic: Flat-lined

5

ꕤ Flat-lined ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- The outburst I've had over Twitter has given me a headache, and I'm occupying some weird 'nowhere' space, where I'm looking for something of interest news-wise, but can't muster enthusiasm or energy enough for anything I'm looking at.  There's no vitality.  It's all dead to me. It's like I've flat-lined, along with everything I'm looking at. I'm probably just tired.  ꕤ

TWITTER - C*CKSUCKERS!!!

ꕤ TWITTER CENSORSHIP BLOCKED BY TWITTER TWATS POLITICAL OPPRESSION [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] TWITTER TWATS TWITTER ACCOUNT LOCKED mid posting these: [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- TWITTER TWATS Twitter C*cksuckers! have shut down my account because I'm POSTING messages on their effing service -- which is what it's for.  WTF? C*cksuckers! C*cksuckers! No idea whether I'll ever be able to access this account again without submitting to Twitter RAPE OF MY PRIVACY! C*cksuckers! ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- C*cksuckers! TWITTER STASI 'RULES' 'Automation rules and best practices' LINK | here None of that 'automated' Twitter bullsh*t is even applicable. I'm not a program: I'm a person exercising political expression. DUMB Twitter programmers couldn't even factor in a pop-up notice that forewarns Twitter customers that their account is about to be taken for an automated posting programmed spam-job, the STUPID F*CKING ASSH*LES. DUMB Twitter programmers couldn't (or wouldn't) even factor in an e-mail verification option for customers who opt to retain their privacy, by choosing NOT to register their f*cking telephone numbers with the STUPID ASSH*LE TWITTER PLATFORM. May the CyberCaliphate have their day in cyberspace, ASSH*LES AT TWITTER.  F*ck you, TWITTER !!!! TWITTER TWATS C*cksuckers! ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- I consider Twitter demands for telephone verification a form of 'ransomware' programming and PRIVACY RAPE. Access to the account has not been restored by Twitter support, despite repeat messaging to Twitter, via their handle on the service. [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] ATTEMPT TO RESET PASSWORD, RETURNS E-MAIL RESPONSE DEMAND FOR PHONE NUMBER: [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] Temporary / Alternate Twitter Account TWITTER TWATS C*cksuckers! BLOCKED BY TWITTER LINK | here [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] C*cksuckers! TWITTER has now blocked my alternate account as well, after being notified of the rape of my privacy by ransomware-programming & by ongoing demand for telephone particulars, following password resetting. Also mentioned that their service sucks balls. And it does, big time:  the c*cksucking Twitter Stasi have subsequently blocked my alternate account.  TWITTER TWATS C*cksuckers! I am therefore vindicated Twitter Stasi CENSOR and RAPE customers' privacy, & 'off' them if they complain. [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] NOTE:  'automated behaviour' TWITTER refers to did not EXIST -- as in, a series of like posts were NOT made on this alternate account.  TWITTER are therefore dirty f*cking LIARS, as well as ball-sucking Stasi privacy-rapists & political oppressors of the PUBLIC VOICE. I HAVE THEREFORE JUST BEEN RAPED BY TWITTER This is TWITTER CENSORSHIP & POLITICAL OPPRESSION without a doubt. TWITTER TWATS [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] [CLICK image for enlargement / clarity] C*cksuckers! RELATED ARTICLES TWITTER STASI - CENSORSHIP RAPE 'Twitter Unverifies Writer Amid Speech Wars'  & CIA, TWITTER, BUZZFEED WIDER WAR ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH LINK | Post ꕤ

Germany: Cologne Rapes Are Not Right Wing Propaganda

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/07/watch-cologne-body-builder-tried-protect-women-rapist-migrants-beat/ http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/07/watch-cologne-body-builder-tried-protect-women-rapist-migrants-beat/ WATCH: Cologne Body Builder Who Tried To Protect Women From Rapist Migrants: ‘I Beat Them All Up’ by Oliver Lane7 Jan 2016 A video uploaded by a Cologne body builder expressing his surprise and disgust at the New Year’s Eve attacks in Cologne which he witnessed first hand has gone viral in Germany, racking up over four million views. Cologne based Ivan Jurevic uploaded his reflections on the night of chaos on Tuesday, offering a rare eye witness account of the attacks which he observed from his position at the door of a luxury hotel overlooking the Cathedral Square, and repeating the observation of a police officer who called the violence a “civil war”. A champion body builder and martial artist, Mr. Jurevic is also an actor, playing a number of ‘tough guy’ roles in German film and television. Running his own security agency, Mr. Jurevic was working the door of an exclusive New Year’s Eve party charging some €300 a head for entry when young women starting coming to him for protection having been attacked outside the cathedral and the railway station. In the viral video that has been viewed millions of times, Mr. Jurevic said: “As I started to work that evening, I thought it would be a nice evening with some well to do people… suddenly between nine and ten o’clock it started outside the hotel, a stabbing occurred. One person was in critical condition… and then the whole thing escalated”. Referring to the extraordinary scenes seen in Germany in September as migrant trains arriving were greeted by cheering crowds, Mr. Jurevic said: “These people that we welcomed just three months ago with teddy bears and water bottles on the Munich railway station started shooting [fireworks] at the police who had come quipped with helmets onto the [Cathedral] platform… seasoned police officers then told me they had never seen anything like it in their entire life. “They called it, and I quote, ‘a civil war like situation’ And there was no press coverage of this whatsoever! “Throughout the evening again and again women came to me and asked if they could just stand next to me so I could look after them. I still didn’t quite know what that was all about. They told me they were chased by these guys”. The men who had chased the girls then attempted to attack again, but martial arts expert Jurevic was ready: “These guys that chased them, then they really tried to attack me. I’ll have to be honest, I beat them all up. “I’ve never witnessed something like this, I always thought this stuff would be some sort of right wing propaganda. But it was real!”. Explaining the small number of arrests made by German police that night, Mr. Jurevic said he witnessed migrant criminals being rounded up but then released hours later, as there were no available police vans to take them away, and all the cells in the city has already been filled. As the migrants were released, he witnessed them turn around and shout “fuck the police”. Although the account of Mr. Jurevic has yet to be independently verified, his assessment of the facts [is] known tally with official accounts of the chaos in Cologne on new year’s eve. Along with the shocking testimony of dozens of girls who have come forward since their abuse at the weekend and as reported by Breitbart London, a picture of a city centre completely out of the control of police who have suffered years of significant cuts in manpower and equipment budgets. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/07/watch-cologne-body-builder-tried-protect-women-rapist-migrants-beat/ ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT Police should be empowered to shoot on sight, no questions asked.  No vans required.  Clean up the mess after the party's over.  Problem solved. ꕤ

Ralf Jaeger: Germany's Right-Wing Nationalists in Chatrooms the Problem - Not the Marauding Invader Rapists of German Women

ꕤ Article SOURCE http://www.dailywire.com/news/2426/muslims-rape-women-germany-new-years-german-michael-qazvini http://www.dailywire.com/news/2426/muslims-rape-women-germany-new-years-german-michael-qazvini Muslims Rape Women In Germany On New Year’s. German Minister Says Something INSANE About It. Michael Qazvini After a gang of 1,000 Muslim men viciously assaulted over 100 women on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Germany, some German politicians condemned “the right-wing” for its apparent “anti-immigrant” rhetoric. Yes, you read that correctly. Muslim men launched a coordinated mass rape mission against German women and authorities are berating their political opposition. Here is the interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia, Ralf Jaeger:     What happens on the right-wing platforms and in chat rooms is at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women. This is poisoning the climate of our society. He actually said that. Right-wing chat rooms are as just as bad as rape. This is worse than a satirical sketch; it’s callous and crude. This is one-step removed from leftist self-parody; it’s leftist misogyny. 150 women have stepped forward so far, telling the police of the horrifying trauma they experienced that evening. At least 150 women were harassed, sexually assaulted, robbed, or raped. And this is what the men in charge seem to be worried about: “right wing...chat rooms.” The interior minister’s chief concern appears to be shadowy right-wingers who say mean things online. The women who were raped can wait. “Mr Jaeger also warned that anti-immigrant groups were trying to use the attacks to stir up hatred against refugees,” reports BBC. Earlier this week, German authorities even blamed the victims. “The mayor of Cologne, Germany suggested generated controversy this week by saying that women can protect themselves against sexual assault by keeping men at an arm's length away,” notes The Daily Beast. Defenseless women apparently must suck it up and weather the storm. Male Muslim “refugees” are here to stay. http://www.dailywire.com/news/2426/muslims-rape-women-germany-new-years-german-michael-qazvini ---------------------- ꕤ ---------------------- COMMENT German politicians don't care about the raped German women. Germany was hiding rapes of women and girls by immigrants and 'refugees' (as was the German media), well before this. The priority for politicians and for law enforcement, under control of politicians, is to make out as if there is no problem.  And the media, the left wingers and the feminists assist in spinning propaganda and sweeping everything under the rug, while German -- and other Western European -- women get raped by third world invaders. The politicians don't want any heat politically, and they don't want to reverse their open door mass immigration policies, even while such policies destroy their people and their homelands. The secondary factor:  politicians and law enforcement both presumably don't want race riots in their cities. So keeping information suppressed, pretending that all is well, blaming Germans and German women, and spinning propaganda, is the preferred course.  But this is a stop-gap measure. Race riots are inevitable and conditions will deteriorate. If European men have any fight for survival left in them, Europe will be awash in blood again.  It is just a matter of time. Nobody gives up their homeland without violent resistance. ꕤ