TOKYO MASTER BANNER

MINISTRY OF TOKYO
US-ANGLO CAPITALISMEU-NATO IMPERIALISM
Illegitimate Transfer of Inalienable European Rights via Convention(s) & Supranational Bodies
Establishment of Sovereignty-Usurping Supranational Body Dictatorships
Enduring Program of DEMOGRAPHICS WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR on Europeans
Enduring Program of European Displacement, Dismemberment, Dispossession, & Dissolution
No wars or conditions abroad (& no domestic or global economic pretexts) justify government policy facilitating the invasion of ancestral European homelands, the rape of European women, the destruction of European societies, & the genocide of Europeans.
U.S. RULING OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR TO SALVAGE HEGEMONY
[LINK | Article]

*U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR* | U.S. Empire's Casino Unsustainable | Destabilised U.S. Monetary & Financial System | U.S. Defaults Twice A Year | Causes for Global Financial Crisis of 2008 Remain | Financial Pyramids Composed of Derivatives & National Debt Are Growing | *U.S. OLIGARCHY WAGES HYBRID WAR*

Who's preaching world democracy, democracy, democracy? —Who wants to make free people free?
[info from Craig Murray video appearance, follows]  US-Anglo Alliance DELIBERATELY STOKING ANTI-RUSSIAN FEELING & RAMPING UP TENSION BETWEEN EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA.  British military/government feeding media PROPAGANDA.  Media choosing to PUBLISH government PROPAGANDA.  US naval aggression against Russia:  Baltic Sea — US naval aggression against China:  South China Sea.  Continued NATO pressure on Russia:  US missile systems moving into Eastern Europe.     [info from John Pilger interview follows]  War Hawk:  Hillary Clinton — embodiment of seamless aggressive American imperialist post-WWII system.  USA in frenzy of preparation for a conflict.  Greatest US-led build-up of forces since WWII gathered in Eastern Europe and in Baltic states.  US expansion & military preparation HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN THE WEST.  Since US paid for & controlled US coup, UKRAINE has become an American preserve and CIA Theme Park, on Russia's borderland, through which Germans invaded in the 1940s, costing 27 million Russian lives.  Imagine equivalent occurring on US borders in Canada or Mexico.  US military preparations against RUSSIA and against CHINA have NOT been reported by MEDIA.  US has sent guided missile ships to diputed zone in South China Sea.  DANGER OF US PRE-EMPTIVE NUCLEAR STRIKES.  China is on HIGH NUCLEAR ALERT.  US spy plane intercepted by Chinese fighter jets.  Public is primed to accept so-called 'aggressive' moves by China, when these are in fact defensive moves:  US 400 major bases encircling China; Okinawa has 32 American military installations; Japan has 130 American military bases in all.  WARNING PENTAGON MILITARY THINKING DOMINATES WASHINGTON. ⟴  

March 29, 2016

Kangaroo Court Convicts Karadzic


https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337162-karadzic-convicted-crimes-court/

Kangaroo court convicts Karadzic


Published time: 25 Mar, 2016 10:11


By convicting Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic of genocide and crimes against humanity, the war crimes tribunal in The Hague is not bringing peace, reconciliation or closure – but a cynical victor’s justice, an endorsement of ‘might makes right.’

According to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), Karadzic was found guilty of ten out of eleven counts of the original indictment, including the so-called “genocide” of an estimated 8,000 Muslims in Srebrenica and the “joint criminal enterprise” to create an ethnically pure “Greater Serbia” on the ruins of Yugoslavia.

Thursday’s verdict surprised precisely no one. The ICTY was pretty much created to prosecute Karadzic – or rather, the complete Serb political and military leadership during the Wars of Yugoslav Succession in the 1990s. The very purpose of the ad-hoc tribunal, a brainchild of the Clinton administration’s “human rights interventionists,” was to deny any legal legitimacy to the Serbs, while bestowing it on the US and its regional clients and proxies.

While Germany was the principal outside backer of the governments in Slovenia and Croatia when they sought to secede from Yugoslavia in 1991, by the following year that role was taken over by Washington. Embracing the narrative of “democratic” Slovenes, Croats and others waging the righteous fight against “Communist Serbian aggression,” the US backed the Muslims in Bosnia in reneging on the power-sharing agreement with the republic’s Christian majority.

Both Serbs and Croats took up arms in response. By 1994, however, the US had midwifed an alliance between the Croats and Muslims, and later arranged for the Serb leadershipcivilian president Radovan Karadzic and military commander Ratko Mladic – to be indicted for genocide and war crimes.

A major feature of US intervention in the Balkans was the way in which it bypassed, co-opted or sidelined the United Nations. While insinuating NATO into the UN mission until it finally took over, Washington systematically torpedoed peace talks until it could hijack the process with a self-appointed “contact group” and stage the end of the Bosnian War in Dayton, Ohio in 1995.
    The Dayton miracle: Bosnia armistice, still alive at 20 (Op-Edge) https://t.co/nlH7ykhrizpic.twitter.com/ZVEHSOaCkQ
    — RT (@RT_com) November 21, 2015
One key element in the process was the US-inspired creation of the ad-hoc tribunal in May 1993. Yes, it was established by the UN Security Council, in Resolution 827. However, the Security Council claimed to act under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, allowing the creation of “measures to maintain or restore international peace and security.” The very inception of the ICTY required stretching the definition of “measures” to include judicial power the UNSC clearly lacked – and therefore could not delegate.

Even if the tribunal were perfectly legitimate to begin with, its pattern of indictments should have been a signal something was amiss. The ICTY and its backers clearly believed any Serb atrocities were systematic and deliberate, while those committed by anyone else were random or incidental. While every single senior Serb official in present-day Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia was hauled before the court, only a few lower-level Croat, Bosnian Muslim or Albanian officials were even indicted – and most of them were acquitted outright, or on appeal. Only Serbs were charged with genocide – by definition, a systematic crime. Only Serbs were accused of a "joint criminal enterprise," a category specifically constructed for the tribunal by a US jurist.

On May 27, 1999, two months into the illegal NATO war against Yugoslavia, the Tribunal indicted Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic for war crimes and genocide. In July that year, the very same tribunal decided NATO’s declaration it was not guilty of anything was good enough, and merited no further investigation.

“NATO countries are those that have provided the finance to set up the Tribunal, we are amongst the majority financiers… so let me assure that we and the Tribunal are all one on this, we want to see war criminals brought to justice and I am certain that when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage,” NATO spokesman Jamie Shea told reporters on May 17, 1999. Telling enough?

Milosevic was arrested in 2001 by a government installed in a US-backed coup, which sent him to The Hague via extrajudicial rendition. He died in March 2006, under mysterious circumstances, before the trial could be concluded.


On July 11, 2013 – a date deliberately chosen to coincide with the alleged “genocide” in Srebrenica – the ICTY rejected Karadzic’s motion to dismiss the charges. Among the “evidence” cited by US judge Theodor Meron was a hearsay claim that Karadzic had decided “in the early 1990s” to kill a third of the Muslims, convert a third to Orthodoxy, while the rest would leave on their own.

While such a plan did exist, it was the brainchild of the WW2 Nazi-allied Croatian government, and its intended targets were Serbs living in present-day Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The ICTY was accusing the Serbs of doing what was actually done to them 70 years prior – and when Karadzic tried to argue the point, the prosecutors dismissed WW2 as ancient history.

Wednesday’s revelation by Peter Robinson, Karadzic’s legal adviser, that the prosecution chose to share 200-plus pages of exculpatory evidence less than 24 hours before the verdict, is the perfect illustration of how the Tribunal has mocked the rules of due process.

    Just rec'd 208 pages of exculpatory material in #Karadzic case from #ICTY prosecution this afternoon. Seriously, prosecutors?
    — Peter Robinson (@PeterRobinICTY) March 23, 2016

Ironically, the one count on which Karadzic was acquitted demonstrates that the black-robed enablers of “bombs for peace” can’t stomach some of their own nonsense. They ruled that atrocities in seven municipalities did not quite rise to the level of genocide, as they could find no proof of intent. Yet they continued to maintain that what allegedly happened in Srebrenica in 1995 met the definition – because they had to, as “Srebrenica” has become the universal excuse for “humanitarian” mass murder.

“The falseness of the entire situation here defies description,” Karadzic said in his opening defense statement. Thursday, he was proven right.

Nebojsa Malic for RT


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/337162-karadzic-convicted-crimes-court/
---------------------- ----------------------




SERBIA


COMMENT


This show trial public-relations symbolic cleansing of  the bloodied hands of the (Anglo) American empire was set up by a mercantile state whose front-end 'leaders' think nothing of killing half a million Iraqi children and dropping depleted uranium bombs on civilians abroad.
THE KANGAROO COURTS ARE BOTH A SYMBOLIC CLEANSING OF BLOOD FROM AMERICAN-ANGLO HANDS & A PRAGMATIC GENERAL CONTROL STRATEGY THAT'S DESIGNED TO:
1.  ELIMINATE THE POLITICAL AND MILITARY LEADERSHIP OF A NATION:  THUS TO WEAKEN THEIR TARGET/CONQUEST.  IT MAKES EASY PREY -- IT'S LIKE HYENAS MOVING IN FOR THE KILL.  ONLY THESE BLOATED HYENAS CONTROL FINANCE & HAVE THE MEANS TO TAKE DOWN THE STRONG, TO THEN PREY ON THE UNPROTECTED WEAK, FOR GENERATIONS.
2. DESIGNED TO INTIMIDATE THOSE THAT THE MERCANTILE EMPIRE WISHES TO IMPRESS WITH ITS MIGHT, PROBABLY TO PREVENT THEIR VASSALS FROM EVER CHALLENGING THE GREEDY EMPIRE.
3.  JUST AS CREATION OF 'OFFICIAL ENEMIES' IS PRE-AGGRESSION PROPAGANDA PROVIDING PRETEXT FOR INTENDED ATTACK, IN THE AFTERMATH OF ILLEGAL ATTACK, IT PAYS TO CREATE A SUPREME 'VILLAIN' TO PROSECUTE FOR UNSPEAKABLE 'ATROCITIES' ... TO GIVE THE AGGRESSIVE STATE 'JUSTIFICATION' FOR ATROCITIES IT HAS COMMITTED IN PURSUIT OF ITS STRATEGIC AND, ULTIMATELY, PROFIT-MAKING AIMS.
4.  FOOL THE EXPLOITED MASSES, AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF THEIR MASTERS.
SO OF COURSE THEY CHOSE A 'SIGNIFICANT' DATE TO GET THE MAXIMUM PR VALUE FOR THEIR PR BUCK AND FOR THE SHAM TRIAL THEY PAID FOR IN ADVANCE. 

BY MAKING THE OTHER THE VILLAIN ONE CASTS ONESELF TO PLAY ACT THE 'SAINT' AND 'CHAMPION' OF PRINCIPLES & IDEALS ONE PROFESSES TO DEFEND, & THEREFORE THOSE ONE OSTENSIBLY PERSONALLY UPHOLDS & VALUES, AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD PRESUME.
BUT THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE CASE:  AND ESPECIALLY NOT TRUE IN THE CASE OF THE STATE BUILT ON GREED & SOCIOPATHY.
HOW MANY BOMBS HAVE THEY DROPPED, HOW MANY CIVILIANS HAVE THEY KILLED, HOW MANY HAVE THEIR SANCTIONS KILLED, HOW MANY DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENTS HAVE THEY DEPOSED, HOW MANY DESPOTS HAVE THEY INSTALLED, HOW MANY WERE KILLED AND RAPED BECAUSE OF THEIR INTERVENTIONS, & HOW MUCH MISERY HAVE THEY INFLICTED ON PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD -- IN THE NAME OF PROFIT.
IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT WHAT THEY PROFESS IS AN OUTRAGEOUS & OBSCENE LIEIT'S FOOLING THE IGNORANT MASSES THAT COUNTS.

The closest this obscene state has come to being held accountable for its worldwide genocidal spree, is having had just *some* of its representatives convicted in absentia in Malaysia in 2012.


DESTRUCTION
OF EUROPE
THE END OF
EUROPEAN MAN
Over the last 70 years the Anglo-Americans have been destroying Europe and, right now, the despotic financial alliance is targeting Russia with economic and other sanctions, in an attempt to weaken the only strong and independent nation in Europe.

* Don't bother counting the likes of Germany:  the Germans are still under occupation since WWII.  Germany has not been a sovereign state since WWII.

*The French, Italians, Spanish, Swedish etc. are destroying not only their own countries, they are destroying the whole of Europe.
Europeans must resist this destruction of their heritage.

SERBIA 

"U.S. bombers wrote graffiti on this unexploded bomb in Kraljevo: “Do you still wanna be a Serb now!!”
NATO SCUM
LOW I.Q.
MONGREL BASTARDS
'Brave men'
Sending Children
Graffiti Bombs

[source: ibid]


-------/\/\/

SERBIA

What kind of spineless
CIA shill politician
lowlifes
sign a deal with 'NATO'
profiteering mongrel
murderers
of Serbian people?
What kind of low dogs are these politicians?
Low politician whores
on their knees
GAVE ILLEGAL BOMBER
AMERICANS IMMUNITY!
SERBIA
NATO stole your land
SERBIA
NATO stole your heritage
SERBIA
NATO murdered SERBIANS
SERBIA
NATO violated

international law

TO KILL YOUR PEOPLE
SERBIA
American
War criminals

ARE FREE


SERBIA
American
War criminals
Convict son of Serbia
KARADZIC


SERBIA
SERBIA
Nothing can justify this dishonour:  the politicians in Serbia need to be removed.

 --------/\/\/
SERBIA

"Serbia’s pro-Russian parties have asked for a referendum to be held together with the general elections over Belgrade’s potential membership in NATO.

The pro-Russia politicians believe that if populists remain in office after the elections, they will go ahead with NATO membership and will also join the West’s sanctions against Moscow over Ukraine."

Vladimir Putin



Google - YouTube
Filthy Censoring, Harassing
Corporate America
US State Dept. Embedded C*NTS
LINK | Censored by C*nts



Vladimir Putin






WATCH VIDEO - LINK BELOW




---------------------- ----------------------


Getting my Putin fetish fix ... :)






Meanwhile in Serbia ...







Americans Ensure
US Regime
is Not Held Accountable
for US War Crimes

America's illegal wars: Kosovo & Iraq
LINK | Post


USA 'UNSIGNS' - ROME STATUTE - ICC
LINK | Post




.... meanwhile in Serbia


SERBIA
10,000 supporters of the Serbian Radical Party
on Belgrade's Republic Square
mark the 17th anniversary
of bombing of Yugoslavia
by  North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)

also
opposition to
International Criminal Tribunal (ICC)
verdict & sentencing
former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic
to 40 years in prison for genocide and war crimes




---------------------- ----------------------






March 28, 2016

Anatomy of US-Anglo & Franco 'Responsibility to Protect' Lies - Destruction of the Libyan State


Article
SOURCE
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/


Anatomy of US-Anglo & Franco 'Responsibility to Protect' Lies - Destruction of the Libyan State


http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/

Hillary Emails Reveal True Motive for Libya Intervention

by Brad Hoff       January 6, 2016  


Newly disclosed emails show that Libya’s plan to create a gold-backed currency to compete with the euro and dollar was a motive for NATO’s intervention

The New Year’s Eve release of over 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the “who gets to ride with Hillary” selection process set up by her staff, and how a “cute” Hillary photo fared on Facebook.

But historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in the new emails: admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, Al Qaeda embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil, the nefarious origins of the absurd Viagra mass rape claim, and concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves threatening European currency.

Hillary’s Death Squads

A March 27, 2011, intelligence brief [archived here] on Libya, sent by long time close adviser to the Clintons and Hillary’s unofficial intelligence gatherer, Sidney Blumenthal, contains clear evidence of war crimes on the  part of NATO-backed rebels. Citing a rebel commander source “speaking in strict confidence” Blumenthal reports to Hillary [emphasis mine]:
Under attack from allied Air and Naval forces, the Libyan Army troops have begun to desert to the rebel side in increasing numbers. The rebels are making an effort to greet these troops as fellow Libyans, in an effort to encourage additional defections.

(Source Comment: Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting…).

While the illegality of extra-judicial killings is easy to recognize (groups engaged in such are conventionally termed “death squads”), the sinister reality behind the “foreign mercenaries” reference might not be as immediately evident to most.

While over the decades Gaddafi was known to make use of European and other international security and infrastructural contractors, there is no evidence to suggest that these were targeted by the Libyan rebels.

There is, however, ample documentation by journalists, academics, and human rights groups demonstrating that black Libyan civilians and sub-Saharan contract workers, a population favored by Gaddafi in his pro-African Union policies, were targets of “racial cleansing” by rebels who saw black Libyans as tied closely with the regime.[1]

Black Libyans were commonly branded as “foreign mercenaries” by the rebel opposition for their perceived general loyalty to Gaddafi as a community and subjected to torture, executions, and their towns “liberated” by ethnic cleansing. This is demonstrated in the most well-documented example of Tawergha, an entire town of 30,000 black and “dark-skinned” Libyans which vanished by August 2011 after its takeover by NATO-backed NTC Misratan brigades.
  [comment:  they're probably mostly in Europe and otherwise dispersed, rather than all killed? ]

These attacks were well-known as late as 2012 and often filmed, as this report from The Telegraph confirms:
After Muammar Gaddafi was killed, hundreds of migrant workers from neighboring states were imprisoned by fighters allied to the new interim authorities. They accuse the black Africans of having been mercenaries for the late ruler. Thousands of sub-Saharan Africans have been rounded up since Gaddafi fell in August.
It appears that Clinton was getting personally briefed on the battlefield crimes of her beloved anti-Gaddafi fighters long before some of the worst of these genocidal crimes took place.
 
Al-Qaeda and Western Special Forces Inside Libya

The same intelligence email from Sydney Blumenthal also confirms what has become a well-known theme of Western supported insurgencies in the Middle East: the contradiction of special forces training militias that are simultaneously suspected of links to Al Qaeda.

Blumenthal relates that “an extremely sensitive source” confirmed that British, French, and Egyptian special operations units were training Libyan militants along the Egyptian-Libyan border, as well as in Benghazi suburbs.

While analysts have long speculated as to the “when and where” of Western ground troop presence in the Libyan War, this email serves as definitive proof that special forces were on the ground only within a month of the earliest protests which broke out in the middle to end of February 2011 in Benghazi.

By March 27 of what was commonly assumed a simple “popular uprising” external special operatives were already “overseeing the transfer of weapons and supplies to the rebels” including “a seemingly endless supply of AK47 assault rifles and ammunition.”

Yet only a few paragraphs after this admission, caution is voiced about the very militias these Western special forces were training because of concern that, “radical/terrorist groups such as the Libyan Fighting Groups and Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) are infiltrating the NLC and its military command.”

The Threat of Libya’s Oil and Gold to French Interests

Though the French-proposed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 claimed the no-fly zone implemented over Libya was to protect civilians, an April 2011 email [archived here] sent to Hillary with the subject line “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold” tells of less noble ambitions.

The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind: to obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozy’s reputation domestically, assert French military power, and to prevent Gaddafi’s influence in what is considered “Francophone Africa.”

Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency. In place of the noble sounding “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) doctrine fed to the public, there is this “confidential” explanation of what was really driving the war [emphasis mine]:
This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).

(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.)

Though this internal email aims to summarize the motivating factors driving France’s (and by implication NATO’s) intervention in Libya, it is interesting to note that saving civilian lives is conspicuously absent from the briefing.

Instead, the great fear reported is that Libya might lead North Africa into a high degree of economic independence with a new pan-African currency.

French intelligence “discovered” a Libyan initiative to freely compete with European currency through a local alternative, and this had to be subverted through military aggression.

The Ease of Floating Crude Propaganda

Early in the Libyan conflict Secretary of State Clinton formally accused Gaddafi and his army of using mass rape as a tool of war. Though numerous international organizations, like Amnesty International, quickly debunked these claims, the charges were uncritically echoed by Western politicians and major media.

It seemed no matter how bizarre the conspiracy theory, as long as it painted Gaddafi and his supporters as monsters, and so long as it served the cause of prolonged military action in Libya, it was deemed credible by network news.

Two foremost examples are referenced in the latest batch of emails: the sensational [1] claim that Gaddafi issued Viagra to his troops for mass rape, and the [2] claim that bodies were “staged” by the Libyan government at NATO bombing sites to give the appearance of the Western coalition bombing civilians.

In a late March 2011 email, Blumenthal confesses to Hillary that,
I communicated more than a week ago on this story—Qaddafi placing bodies to create PR stunts about supposed civilian casualties as a result of Allied bombing—though underlining it was a rumor. But now, as you know, Robert gates gives credence to it. (See story below.)

Sources now say, again rumor (that is, this information comes from the rebel side and is unconfirmed independently by Western intelligence), that Qaddafi has adopted a rape policy and has even distributed Viagra to troops. The incident at the Tripoli press conference involving a woman claiming to be raped is likely to be part of a much larger outrage. Will seek further confirmation.

Not only did Defense Secretary Robert Gates promote his bizarre “staged bodies” theory on CBS News’ “Face The Nation,” but the even stranger Viagra rape fiction made international headlines as U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice made a formal charge against Libya in front of the UN Security Council.

What this new email confirms is that not only was the State Department aware of the spurious nature of what Blumenthal calls “rumors” originating solely with the rebels, but did nothing to stop false information from rising to top officials who then gave them “credence.”

It appears, furthermore, that the Viagra mass rape hoax likely originated with Sidney Blumenthal himself.
Note

[1] The most comprehensive and well-documented study of the plight of black Libyans is contained in Slouching Towards Sirte: NATO’s War on Libya and Africa (publ. 2012, Baraka Books) by Maximilian Forte, Professor Anthropology and Sociology at Concordia University in Montréal, Québec.

This article was originally published at the Levant Report and has been used here with permission.

  France, Hillary Clinton, Libya, Muammar al-Gaddafi, NATO, US Foreign Policy

 
Brad Hoff served as a Marine from 2000-2004 at Headquarters Battalion, Quantico. After military service he lived, studied, and traveled throughout Syria off and on from 2004-2010. He is Managing Editor of LevantReport.com and currently teaches in Texas.

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/


Libya borders:
  • Egypt
  • Tunisia
  • Algeria
  • Niger
  • Chad
  • Sudan
Egypt - US Aid

New York Times 2014:
-- annual $1.3 billion American military aid package
-- having signed peace agreement with Israel (1979)
-- cash flow finance - preferential military hardware orders from USA
-- granted only to:  Israel & Egypt
-- 2013:  900 protesters killed crackdown on demonstration, Cairo
-- Abdel Fattah el-Sisi reportedly took control by military coup (2013)
-- "deposed strongman Hosni Mubarak"
-- NYT reports 'rigged election' & claims Muslim Brotherhood leaders 'unfairly branded as terrorists'
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/opinion/sunday/reining-in-egypts-military-aid.html?_r=0


Washington Post 2013:
-- since early 1980s, US grants Egypt
-- extraordinary ability to place orders with American arms contractors
-- worth far more than Congress allotted to military aid
-- mechanism:  'cash-flow financing'
-- orders of a size that take years to produce & deliver
-- like a credit card in billions of dollars
-- likewise granted to Israel
-- only Israel & Egypt

-- Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.)
-- subcommittee State Dept. re foreign ops & related:
-- "we are mortgaged years into the future for expensive equipment"
-- "stuck on autopilot for more than 25 years"
-- windfall for U.S. arms contractors
-- replacing Egypt's ageing Soviet hardware / deepening Egypt's dependence on US-made arms
-- USA gets:
    -- expedited access to the Suez Canal for Navy ships
    -- overflight rights for military aircraft
    -- 'face time' with Egypt generals
 

-- Egypt gets:
    -- one of strongest regional militaries

-- US relationship w/ Egypt deemed:  "increasingly volatile, it’s increasingly fluid"
-- country:  unpredictability
-- USA fiscally tied to policy
-- were USA to push-back re Egypt, would impact US arms production industries

-- practice of 'cash-flow financing' commits USG to ongoing financing
-- to ensure signed contracts for arms are honoured
--
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) & Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) were for cutting off aid

2013
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-debate-over-military-aid-to-egypt-contractual-issues-loom-large-for-us/2013/07/25/9d0834c0-f4a5-11e2-aa2e-4088616498b4_story.html



---------------------- ----------------------

COMMENT

Another good article but sort of disturbing.

I suspected all that Viagra rape hysteria was made up.

Rape is a weapon of war, but not in the way that the public thinks.  It's exploited for Western propaganda and lies.

Meanwhile, Eurpean women getting raped by the foreign populations that these corrupt European leaders are flooding Europe with, and it's ignored and covered up.

These politicians are disgusting.

The West tells so many lies that it's probably always safe to assume the opposite of what we're being told at any time by politicians and the controlled media.




Invasive USA Access to European Travel & Associated Data Also Involves Policing




Invasive USA Access to European Travel & Associated Data Also Involves Policing






Passenger Name Record (PNR)
-- computer database of travel reservation
-- contains itinerary for passenger (or groups of passengers travelling together)



United States–European Union

-- Agreement on Passenger Name Records
-- further agreement between USA & European union
-- signed Dec 14, 2011
-- provides USA with information associated with air travel of Europeans
-- data includes hotel bookings, car rental, train trips, transfers etc
-- as well as credit card information, passport info & much more
-- via access to Passenger Name Records (PNR) databases of Europeans


-- subject to:  European Data Protection Law
-- PNR transfer to take place to only countries with comparable data laws, according to:
    -- Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD_
        1980 Privacy Guidelines
    -- 1995 European Union Directive on data protection

  •   law enforcement supposedly permitted to access data only on set individual basis 
-- standards defined by following organisations:

    International Air Transport Association (ITA)
    -- trade association of world's airlines
    -- helps formulate industry standards
    -- HQ Montreal, Canada
    -- executive offices:  Geneva, Switzerland

    Airlines for America (A4A)
    -- formerly:  formerly known as Air Transport Association of America (ATA)
    -- oldest & largest USA airline trade association
    -- members & affiliates transport over 90% of US passenger & cargo traffic
    -- based Washington DC
    -- only org that represents main US airlines re lobbying Congress
   
    Standards defined by AIRIMP
    ie - ATA/IATA Reservations Interline Mesage Procedures - Passenger ('AIRIMP')
Upon passenger booking travel
-- travel agent / travel site will create PNR
-- or, if made directly with airline, PNR created in database of airline CRS
-- CRS = Computer Reservations System (where PNR database is hosted)
-- CRS is an automated computer reserviation system (there's several systems/providers of these)
-- the PNR referred to as 'Master PNR', re the passenger & relevant itenerary

PNRs originally introduced for air travel
-- airlines systems can now be used for booking:
    -- hotels
    -- car rental
    -- airport transfers
    -- train trip
s

-- 2004 - US govt first obtains PNR of Europeans
-- via '2004 Passenger Name Record Data Transfer' agreement with EU
-- data usage supposedly limited to:

  •      terrorism and related crimes
  •      other serious crimes & interl organised crime
  •      flight from warrants or custody

     *agreement required Eurpean PNR to be supplied to USA

-- agreement INVALIDATED by:  European Court of Justice (30 May 2006)
-- reason:  lack of legal authority

-- 2007new controversial PNR agreement between US  EU
-- yet:  George W Bush - gave US Dept Homeland Security & others exemption from 1974 Privacy act

2008, Feb:  USA had signed in February 2008 a memorandum of understanding (MOU)
-- with Czech Republic
-- purpose:  exchange of visa waiver scheme
-- did so without consent of Brussels
-- USA also approached other European countries for MOU
-- tensions b/w Washington & Brussels
-- reason:  LESSER data protection laws in USA
-- furthermore:  foreigners to not benefit from US Privacy Act of 1974
-- US 'Safe Harbour Arrangement' lacks data protection
2008, Nov:  new agreement re new agreement


CRITICISM
-- reductions of privacy rights

Legal Service of the European Commission
x2 academics

[source, above:  Wikipedia]
____________________________________________________
-------/\/\/

EU-US PNR agreement found incompatible with human rights


29 Jun 2011

In a note sent on 16 May 2011 to the Director-General of DG Home Affairs,
the Legal Service of the European Commission warns that the draft EU-US
agreement on the exchange of PNR data is not compatible with fundamental
rights.

The EC’s lawyers found several areas of concern related to the planned
agreement. Significant issues are the proportionality of the agreement which
covers minor crimes as well, its extension to US border security “which is
not linked to the purpose of preventing terrorism or serious crime”, a far
too long (15 years) data retention period for the data collected for the
agreement purpose, the lack of judicial redress for the data subjects, the
lack of “guarantee of independent oversight”.

After having reviewed the present draft, the Legal Service draws the
attention over the fact that its earlier comments had not been considered in
drafting the present variant of the agreement: “all (these) comments were
already transmitted to your services in the course of the negotiations.”

The Legal Service concludes that “despite certain presentational
improvements, the draft agreement does not constitute a sufficiently
substantial improvement of the agreement currently applied on a provisional
basis, the conclusion of which was refused on data protection grounds by the
European Parliament.” Moreover, the use of the PNR data for US
border security is considered a step back from the point of view of data
protection. The conclusion therefore related to the agreement is that “the
Legal Service does not consider the agreement in its present form as
compatible with fundamental rights.”

Hopefully this opinion may weigh in the decision of the European Parliament
which, according to the Lisbon Treaty, has the power to refuse it.
“This Agreement does not meet EU data protection standards of
proportionality or purpose limitation, nor does it provide judicial redress
to data subjects or any guarantee of independent oversight” says Tony
Bunyan, Statewatch Director who believes that it’s high time EU takes
a firmer stand in the matter. “Secret Minutes of EU-US meetings since 2001
show that they have always been a one-way channel with the US setting the agenda by making demands on the EU. When the EU does make rare requests like
on data protection, because US law only offers protection and redress to US
citizens, they are bluntly told that the US is not going to change its data
protection system”.

MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht, member of the European parliament’s civil
liberties committee, believes that by pushing forward this agreement, EU is
acting against its own legal advice. “The commission cannot simply continue
to stick its fingers in its ears, and it is high time that it dropped its
obsession with PNR. This means going back to the drawing board and
renegotiating the draft agreements with the US, Australia and Canada on
passenger record retention, ensuring these agreements are in line with EU
data protection law. It also means dropping the proposed legislation on the
retention of passenger data within the EU.”

As regards the EU PNR proposal, this has been slammed also by the European
Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). The Agency has issued an opinion
on the Proposal for a Directive on the use of PNR data, identifying a series
of issues regarding the compliance of the proposal with the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

FRA is concerned by the risk of direct discrimination related to PNR data
transmitted by air carriers, which may include sensitive or special data.
“It would therefore be useful to introduce a prohibition on the transmission
of such data by air carriers.”

Regarding the limitation of fundamental rights covered by the proposal, FRA
is concerned by the vagueness of several formulations and believes the
explanatory memorandum of the proposal “does not sufficiently substantiate
the necessity of the limitation for all crimes covered,” and that “the
necessity and proportionality of the PNR system would need to be
demonstrated.”

For the compliance with the right to protection of personal data, FRA
suggests the control should be provided by fully independent supervisory
authorities that “can take action on their own initiative to protect
proactively and effectively the interests of data subjects and have
sufficient resources to do so in practice.”

https://edri.org/edrigramnumber9-13us-eu-pnr-breaches-human-rights/

EDRi
-- association of civil and human rights organisations from across Europe
-- We defend rights and freedoms in the digital environment



---------------------- ----------------------



COMMENT
 
What was supposed to monitor travellers to supposedly prevent terrorism in USA, has become a massive policing and invasion of privacy operation, that appears to have created something of one-sided world police arrangement, where the US is the cop and the EU meekly gives over European citizens' data to the Americans, who have inadequate data protection laws per se and Americans who deny Europeans the poor protections they offer their own citizens.  Americans with an exceedingly poor attitude to accommodating the legal requirements of the Europeans.  Americans who can do what they like with data that they've most likely bullied the European cretins into giving them.
Why would anybody enter into agreements with those that are so arrogant they refuse to consider adapting their laws to provide like privacy protections for foreigners, let alone those that do not reciprocate when it comes to data sharing?
The EU needs to get a backbone.

Canada and Australia are also party to the EU PNR agreement.  But I'm not sure why.  

Is the EU such a hive of terrorism that the Australians and Canadians have had to jump on the US data demanding bandwagon?

European Union (EU)-Australia Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreement.

The PNR Agreement will allow for information about travellers flying into Australia on airlines using EU-based IT service providers to be disclosed to Australian Customs officials.

The ability to access this key information on airline passengers is a vital border security tool for Australia.  It will assist in the fight against terrorism and serious crimes. 

http://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2008/fa-s080701.html

It looks like Europe is Terrorist Central.  Gee, wonder why?

Not sure if any of the points raised by the Legal Service of the European Union Commission were remedied in the final draft.  Doubt it.

I think the issue of the moment is that this is a one-sided contract, where the European Union leaves European citizens wide open to violation of their privacy as well as their basic rights.   But, meanwhile, the US is not subject to the same terms & is not providing the European Union like access to American data.

So the same Americans who make sure they cannot be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for criminal acts of war they have performed (and intent to continue to perform), are the very same party that demands to violate European privacy and rights and, it appears, also to insist on engaging in law enforcement pertaining to Europeans.

It's creepy thinking how extensive US interference and reach across the globe is.
It's a world-wide corporate dictatorship, headed by USA.

The travel data sharing was first obtained by the Americans from the Europeans in 2004.

So this probably explains the 'disappearance' of Assange's equipment:

"... likely unlawful seizure of property belonging to me and to WikiLeaks while it was under the control of the airport authorities of Arlanda (Stockholm) or Tegel (Berlin) on 27 September 2010, inter alia three encrypted laptops containing privileged journalistic and legal materials  including evidence of a war crime; and this affidavit sets forth facts that form the basis of my belief that the aforementioned  property was the subject of an unlawful search and seizure and that the monitoring of my activities in Germany was also illegal." [1]

"The suspected seizure or theft occurred at a time of intense attempts by the US to stop WikiLeaks' publications of 2010." [1]

  • airline carrier refused to cooperate with Assange [2] 
  • Assange Swedish lawyer request to prosecutor's office regarding seizure or theft received no reply [2]


[1] Affidavit
[2] https://justice4assange.com/Prosecution.html