FUCK THE PLEBS FORMULA
U.K. LABOUR CASE STUDY
Immigration: How Genocidal Politicians Fuck the European Public & Dispossess Indigenous Europeans
Summary
(Daily Mail Article)
SOURCE
How Blair silenced debate over migrant influx and refused to acknowledge public's doubts about open borders
By Tom Bower for the Daily Mail
Published: 10:32 EST, 27 February 2016 | Updated: 23:39 EST, 27 February 2016
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466499/Conman-betrayed-Britain-immigration-utterly-amoral-PM-led-conspiracy-let-MILLIONS-migrants-breaking-rules-deceiving-public.html
-------/\/\/
Summary
-- Tony Blair tells Jack Straw: ‘Immigration is good for Britain.’
-- three terms of office
-- over 2 million more migrants than govt expected settled UK
-- Blair: dismissed concerns on basis of 'good for the economy'
-- anyone against: deemed 'racist Tory'
-- reinforced by BBC reluctance to debate issue
-- reinforced by BBC endorsing Labour promotion of 'multiculturalism'
-- preference of migrants for segregated communities never addressed
-- encouraged foreigners to believe there was no need to 'integrate'
-- post 1997: Sarah Spencer, academic, influence on govt policy
-- Spencer admitted later: there was no policy for 'integration'
-- 7/7 bombings London by Islamist terrorists failed to alert Blair of danger
-- ignored Muslim preachers (x2) advocating violence London streets
-- Jack Straw advised that Muslims must not be alienated
-- after 1999 election issue became FLOW OF BOGUS ASYLUM SEEKERS
-- that's the only time it concerned Tony Blair
-- used sleight of hand with full connivance of Tony Blair to 'solve' problem
-- 350,000 asylum-seekers converted into 'economic immigrants' & given work permits & benefits rights
-- Labour lost control of immigration AND ACTIVELY ENCOURAGED IT
-- Blair refused to appoint dedicated Cabinet committee or special adviser
-- only appointed adviser mid-way
-- ignoring immigration set the tone on issue
-- Blair, the war criminal, then introduced: the HUMAN RIGHTS BILL
-- 'ASYLUM SEEKER' GUARANTEE BRITISH COURT ASSESSMENT
-- interpreted as a green light to all-comers
-- Tory warnings: UK honeypot for third world economic migrants
-- who entered as tourists & then claimed asylum
-- were dismissed as 'racist'
-- 1995: asylum seekers claim more than £200 million in benefits
-- of those, only 5% were 'genuine refugees'
-- Jack Straw insisted all arrivals be accepted as genuine 'refugees'
-- 'approved nations' list instructed to be expanded (by Straw)
-- Nigerians, Afghans & others could claim asylum
-- immigration HQ - 2-year 52,000 backlog of asylum applicants
-- applications riddled with lies
-- top attitude filtered down: loose with appraisals & Briton's interests
-- even failed applicants became entitled to benefits
-- promise of easy money spread across the globe
-- steep increase in asylum seeking arrivals
-- immigration head Tim Walker suggest English speaking proviso
-- Jack Straw refused qualification / opted for stronger borders
-- behind the scenes Jack Straw continued to make it easy for invaders
-- THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL ALBANIANS & IRAQIS ENTER POSING AS KOSOVO REFUGEES
-- could not identify local landmarks etc.
-- next batch of Albanians passed with flying colours
-- were briefed by their British taxpayer funded c*nt 'human rights' lawyer scumbags on the 'human rights' *DISPOSSESSION FRAUD* gravy train, the c*cksuckers
-- Straw & Blair answer: food stamps in lieu of cash as deterrence
-- HOWEVER, makes no difference: BETTER STANDARD OF LIVING PREVAILS
-- officials approve dodgy applications rather than ENGAGE IN ENDLESS APPEALS before judges
-- judges interpretation of HR law FAVOURED BOGUS APPLICANTS
-- PUBLICLY govt spoke of stepping up deportations
-- BUT, IN FACT, INSUFFICIENT STAFF TO CARRY OUT DEPORTATIONS
-- chaos spread: deportations declined, backlog increased
-- result: INVITATION FOR MORE TO TURN UP
-- Kent Council: blocks of flats & even streets were foreign territory
-- Blair ignored probs
-- Blair announced Labour making it easier for FOREIGN STUDENTS to study in Britain
-- officials warned Jack Straw: foreign students AMOUNTED TO AN INVITATION for BOGUS STUDENTS
-- to enrol in SHAM LANGUAGE SCHOOLS & to REMAIN after VISA EXPIRY
-- result: additional 75,000 students following year
-- as immigration mounted:
-- Straw - 1999 law:
-- OUTLAWED BOGUS MARRIAGE
-- fined LORRY DRIVERS FOR SMUGGLING MIGRANTS
-- *slightly* REDUCED BENEFITS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS
-- HOWEVER: very same law STRENGTHENED RIGHTS OF ASYLUM SEEKERS
-- allowed them to stay in Britain until they exhausted all appeals
-- lawyers patrolling Heathrow
-- clients off planes assured of lengthy delays
-- [comment: not sure if this is literal or not]
-- news re 'tolerant' UK spread, encouraging:
-- Kurds
-- Tamils
-- Sri Lankans
-- meanwhile, migrants from Balkans & Afghanistan, head for Calais
-- board lorries to be smuggled into UK
-- tens of thousands others, DESTROY IDENTITY DOCUMENTS
-- *MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR OFFICIALS TO DEPORT THEM*
-- tens of thousands of new asylum applications
-- MARRIAGE RACKETS flourishing
-- lawyers SCHOOLING APPLICANTS in what to tell immigration officers
-- by June 1999 backlog went from start of Labour 52,000 to 125,000
-- legal immigration soared to 360,000
-- Britain was becoming known as the asylum capital of Europe
-- increasing media outcry
-- Blair blamed surge in numbers on:
-- improved economy
-- failure to make ID cards compulsory
-- Blair was careful never publicly to mention rising number of immigrants from India & Pakistan
--housing, schools & healthcare for additional 300,000 arriving per year
-- not considered by Labour
-- consequences to British working class not considered: -- 23 British workers displaced for every 100 foreign-born workers employed UK
[comment: the rest on benefits? No, reference is for every 100 *employed*. But doing what? What are the job creation figures and how do the 'new jobs' figures relate to merely supporting what is self-erasing invasion (eg provision of housing, health, education, food & supplies transport logistics etc to maintain a foreign population). Sort of like a 'ponzi scheme' of economic 'prosperity' by invasion. ]
-- Barbara Roche appointed: Junior Immigration Minister
-- deport bogus asylum seekers, only instruction to Roche
-- Roche wasn't following directive
-- 'should be allowed to stay'
-- removal 'takes too long'
-- 'it's emotional'
-- bogus 'negative feeling' says Roche
-- *Roche wanted more immigrants
-- Roche worked on speech:
-- outlined 'advantages' of reducing controls on immigration
-- portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour
-- Roche argued for more work permits for migrants
-- despite number souring to 40,000 from 25,000 (start Labour office)
-- more work permits, according to Roche = drop pretence of 'asylum seeker'
-- described economic immigrants as:
- -- entrepreneurs
- -- scientists
- -- high technology specialists
- -- 'global economy' clockwork components
-- refused to set figure: said it would be 'foolish'
-- Roche was unsung economic migrants as SMOKESCREEN FOR INCREASING IMMIGRATION
-- pro-immigration lobby assumed Blair endorsed Roche’s views
-- her speech passed relatively unnoticed
-- migrants quickly grasped its importance & passed news on
-- Britain would provide benefits and state housing
-- Roche legacy: more migrants camped in squalor
-- benefits began attracting Somalis from other EU countries
-- over 200,000 Somalis arrived
-- most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare
-- Home Office *COULD* have refused them entry
-- *but hey were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’
-- Blair remained mute about large influx
-- 2001: Straw replaced by David Blunkett, who inherited mess
-- 2000: 97,000 asylum applications (record number)
-- only 10,185 were 'genuine'
-- only 4,870 were deported
-- Blunkett neither discussed nor reduced immigration of ‘family members’
-- then running at 210,00 per annum from India
-- David Blunkett then decided to:
-- admit asylum seekers as skilled migrants
-- Blair approved the ruse
-- Blair gives Blunkett go-ahead to issue 150,000 WORK PERMITS in 2002
-- numbers rose
-- over 500,000 migrants (vs original estimate of 100,000) by end year
-- Labour only concerned w/ deportation with the more bogus asylum seekers
-- Blunkett sought to build: 15 detention centres
-- Gordon Brown only approved 3
-- trade unions & migrants dislike voucher system
-- Blair says get rid of voucher system
-- thought to deter 100,000 per annum
-- Blunkett agrees to discontinue vouchers
-- Labour govt then reduces backlog of asylum applications
-- BY APPROVING ENTRY OF 50,000 MORE
-- Labour plan was not to discuss 'advantages' of immigration in public
-- BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DOES NOT EVEN WANT THAT
LABOUR: DELIBERATE EXPLOITATION & VIOLATION OF INDIGENOUS BRITONS
-- so Labour govt instructed to only publicly discuss 'efforts' to stop 'bad' immigration
-- amnesty for 50,000 asylum seekers quietly extended to include 150,000 illegals
-- eg. granting of a work permit to one-legged Romanian who described himself as a roofer
-- more migrants arrive
-- 2010: 591,000 = 5 times higher than when Blair assumed office
-- 2003: x4 Algerian asylum seekers, all on benefits
-- arrested London & Manchester making bomb containing poison ricin
-- resulting outcry
-- Blair calls Blunkett
-- Blair puts on a BBC TV performance for public re reduction
-- Labour PM employed an empty promise to defuse a problem
-- he was governing Britain via the media
-- Blunkett instructs immigration HQ to fast-track:
-- more asylum applications; &
-- speed up the approval of work permits
-- decisions remained unannounced
-- at start of Blair’s third term 85% electorate condemned govt policy
-- Labour continued to pursue policies regardless
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466499/Conman-betrayed-Britain-immigration-utterly-amoral-PM-led-conspiracy-let-MILLIONS-migrants-breaking-rules-deceiving-public.html
|
How mass immigration obliterates England’s identity
The left promotes globalization with their open borders and immigration policies
EXTRACT
By Robert W. Merry - - Monday, January 11, 2016
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Benjamin Schwarz has produced an expository piece on the impact of Britain’s mass immigration policies of the past 20 years that constitutes what is probably the most probing analysis of those policies to be seen on this side of the pond — and probably on the other side as well. Titled “Unmaking England: Will immigration demolish in decades a nation built over centuries?” it appears in the current issue of The American Conservative magazine. (Disclosure: I sit on the board of the American Ideas Institute, which publishes the magazine.)
...
The result is a profound transformation not only in British demographics, but also in British politics, culture, economics, national identity and the social fabric. Serious tensions are emerging in the polity that wouldn’t be there if the country had continued its immigration policies that prevailed before 1948 — going all the way back at least to the Conquest in 1066.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/11/robert-merry-how-mass-immigration-obliterates-engl/
|
United Kingdom 1948
Monarch - George VI, King of the United Kingdom (1936–1952)
Prime Minister - Clement Attlee, Labour PM of UK (1945–1951)
Decolonisation
-- responsible for beginning the process of decolonisation of the British Empire, starting by granting independence to India
-- Britain creates the Pakistan Muslim majority state
-- (which then incorporated East Pakistan, now Bangladesh)
-- redrawing borders:
-- large-scale population movements & heavy bloodshed both sides
-- independence of Burma and Ceylon negotiated
-- new countries became British Dominions
-- modern 'Commonwealth of Nations' established
-- most demanding problem was supposedly 'future' of Palestine Mandate
-- *but future of Palestine decided WWI in exchange US entry into war
-- Truman govt & Zionist movement perceived British policies as pro-Arab
-- [so preferential treatment to Arabs not likely - Israel was a done deal]
-- armed Zionist militants increase violence on Arab population
-- UK wealth of experience subordinating nations, 'couldn't' control this?
-- evacuated troops / handed matter to United Nations
-- major UK military base built in Kenya
-- austerity Budget 1950 - cost of UK participation in Korean War
-- African colonies under unprecedented direct control of UK
-- schemes implemented to:
-- address post-war balance of payments crisis
-- raise African living standards [as if .. who writes this crap]
-- new colonialism a failure
-- using the Dominions of Canada, Australia, & New Zealand as a model -- transformation of the Empire into the Commonwealth
-- establishment of political & economic consensus on governance of Britain
-- all parties, whether Labour, Conservative or Liberal subscribed to
-- entry says 'for 3 decades' but that is incorrect: it continues to this day
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Attlee
Commonwealth of Nations
-- formally constituted by the London Declaration in 1949
-- the big lies*:
-- shared values:
-- democracy
-- human rights
-- rule of law
-- estimated population of 2.328 billion, nearly third of world pop. (2013)
-- 17% of the gross world product
-- when measured in purchasing power parity (PPP)
-- 14% of the gross world product when measured nominally
-- UK 1932 founded the 'New Commonwealth Society'
-- aimed at the creation of an international air force to be arm of the League of Nations
-- 'New Commonwealth' term
-- recently decolonised countries, predominantly non-white and developing
-- often used in debates about immigration from these countries
-- British trade w/ Commonwealth was 4 times larger than trade w/ Europe
-- late 1950s: Plan G to create a European free trade zone
-- proposals stalled
-- Commonwealth of Nations
-- objectives were first outlined in 1971 Singapore Declaration
-- ostensible commitment of Commonwealth of Nations:
-- world peace;
-- promotion of representative 'democracy';
-- promotion of individual 'liberty';
-- promotion of pursuit of 'equality';
-- opposition to 'racism';
-- 'fight' against poverty, ignorance, and disease;
-- FREE TRADE
-- objectives reinforced by: Harare Declaration in 1991
-- current highest-priority aims:
-- promotion of 'democracy' & 'development'
-- outlined in the 2003 Aso Rock Declaration
-- built on Singapore and Harare declarations
-- terms of reference:
-- democracy
-- good governance
-- human rights
-- gender equality
-- more equitable sharing of 'benefits of GLOBALISATION'
*leaked memo from Sec/ Gen.
instructing staff not to speak on human rights published in Oct 2010
see:
-- Commonwealth Heads of Government
-- Commonwealth Eminent Persons Group panel
-- among recomm. repeal laws re homosexuality in 41 C'wth states 2011
-- failure to release the report
-- ministerial management group was empowered with enforcement
-- group includes alleged human rights offenders
-- agreed to develop a charter of values for the Commonwealth
-- without any decision on how compliance to be enforced
-- 2013: new Charter of the Commonwealth
-- opposes:
"all forms of discrimination, whether rooted in gender, race, colour, creed, political belief or other grounds"
-- EU is already in the process of negotiating free trade agreements with many Commonwealth countries
-- no formal free trade agreement b/w Commonwealth of Nations members
-- but trade to 50% more with member states than non-member, on average
2009 poll on 60th anniversary of founding Commonwealth of Nations
-- public of 7 member states polled:
-
-- Australia
-
-- Canada
-
-- India
-
-- Jamaica
-
-- Malaysia
-
-- South Africa
-
-- UK
-- most people in these countries largely ignorant of the Commonwealth activities
-- support for the Commonwealth twice as high in developing countries as in developed countries
-- lowest in Great Britain
-- HQ: Marlborough House, London
-- member states: 53
-- see:
• Balfour Declaration 19 November 1926
• Statute of Westminster 11 December 1931
• London Declaration 28 April 1949
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations
*cannot value 'human rights' while obliterating rights of one's people & obliterating one's people as an entity
*democracy is a lie: the many are ruled by the few, & the vital interests of the many that constitute THE PEOPLE are violated by those that rule
|
COMMENT
This misses the point.
Whether deemed 'genuine' 'asylum seekers' or not, the consequences to the indigenous European are the same.
So this is an irrelevancy.
And all those so-called 'extremists' are correct: it's a deliberate program of dispossession and genocide of Europeans by the political scum that interface between the public and whoever pulls their strings.
Bear in mind, this is not a mere Blair 'accident' or incompetence. This is a f*cking deliberate program dating back to the late 1940s.
But the lying c*cksucker press would have you believe it was just the result of voting in the Labour a$$holes.
All politicians are the same and the program remains the same.
PS ... check out the 'Commonwealth of Nations' supranational government that pretends to be all about 'human rights' ... but it's about trade and profit.
|
EU-NATO IMPERIALISM ❌ 
